Veterans Race to Bring Afghan Allies to U.S. Before Trump Travel Ban

The nonprofit No One Left Behind has raised millions of dollars for flights and other assistance to prevent Afghans from being stranded abroad and face retribution from the Taliban.

The fate of thousands of Afghans waiting to reach the United States after serving with American troops was thrown into limbo after President Trump took office. Now military veterans are scrambling to bring as many of them as possible to the country before the administration introduces a travel ban that could restrict their entry.

In an executive order on Jan. 20, Mr. Trump instructed cabinet members, including the secretary of state, to compile a list of countries “for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.”

The order called for the list to to be completed within 60 days. As that deadline nears, supporters of the Afghan allies have accelerated efforts to bring those eligible to the United States.

Amid the chaotic pullout from Afghanistan in August 2021, the U.S. military helped evacuate 78,000 Afghans who worked as interpreters and in other capacities during the war. Tens of thousands of others who aided U.S. forces are still trying to reach the United States.

The wartime allies can apply for a Special Immigrant Visa, which allows them to travel to the United States with their families and receive permanent residence. Many have been waiting for months or longer in neighboring Pakistan and in Albania and Qatar to complete processing by U.S. authorities.

In his first term, Mr. Trump barred nationals from seven majority Muslim countries — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — from entering the United States. This time, Afghanistan is among the countries whose citizens could be categorically blocked, according to U.S. officials. The officials said that Cuba and Venezuela could also be added.

If Mr. Trump includes Afghanistan in a new travel ban, Afghans who helped the United States could be stranded indefinitely.

After his inauguration, the president also signed an executive order that paused funding for refugee resettlement, suspending travel to the United States for thousands of people around the world who had been screened and approved for entry.

Afghans who had obtained Special Immigrant Visas were not barred from relocating to the United States. But in shutting down refugee admissions, the State Department canceled the contracts that had also covered the costs of transporting the Afghan allies. Suddenly they had to pay their own way, and many could not afford the cost.

“People with visas in their passports saw their pathway to safety stripped away overnight,” said Sonia Norton, advocacy director for No One Left Behind, which is based in Arlington, Va.

The organization’s main role had been to supplement government support by providing Afghan families with loans to buy cars, further their education and adjust to the United States. After the executive orders, it quickly pivoted to an emergency fund-raising campaign.

About 37,000 Afghans, and their families, have been issued Special Immigrant Visas since 2009, when the program began. The Taliban, which rules Afghanistan, regards those Afghans as traitors. Thousands have faced retaliatory violence and hundreds have been killed for assisting the United States, according to a 2022 report by No One Left Behind.

At the time that Mr. Trump signed the executive orders in January, some 1,000 Afghans and their family members had visas to come to the United States. Returning to Afghanistan is not an option for them, Mr. Sullivan said.

“There’s a very real chance that they could get kicked back to the Taliban with a U.S. visa in their passport, and that could be deadly to these allies,” Mr. Sullivan, 38, who was an Army infantry company commander in Afghanistan, said in an interview from Doha, Qatar, where his team was on the ground in recent days.

“If we don’t know what’s going to happen with immigration policy, we’re not going to sit idly by,” he said. “We’re going to come and support them.”

No One Left Behind, established in 2014, has raised millions of dollars in a matter of weeks from veterans and other Americans to buy airplane tickets for Afghan families who had already been cleared to travel to the United States from Albania, Qatar and Pakistan.

Several veteran groups, including Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, have voiced concern for the fate of the Afghan allies.

Three Republican members of Congress said in a letter to President Trump that his executive orders had resulted in the “immediate shutdown” of Afghan relocation efforts. “These are not random applicants or illegal migrants who’ve crossed the southern border,” said the March 4 letter signed by Michael Lawler of New York, Michael McCaul of Texas and Richard Hudson of North Carolina.

“For many Afghans in the pipeline, staying in Afghanistan is a death sentence,” they said.

The White House did not respond to request for comments on the impact of the executive orders or the effects of a potential travel ban on Afghans who supported the U.S. mission.

Aman Jafari, who interpreted for U.S. Navy Seals, arrived in Portland, Ore., from Albania on March 5 with his wife and four young children.

“When Mr. Trump canceled flights, we didn’t have money to book our own flights to America,” said Mr. Jafari, 33. ”We just worried terribly what would happen next.”

Then No One Left Behind stepped in, he said.

On Tuesday, Mr. Sullivan arrived in Los Angeles from Doha to meet potential donors.

Evelyn Moore, 67, who has no military connections, said she had donated to the organization’s effort because Mr. Trump’s policies could have “dire consequences” for those who risked their lives for the United States.

“We must keep our allies on a path to the U.S., as promised,” she said.

By the end of this week, No One Left Behind hopes to have flown to the United States every Afghan who already has a visa.

It must also help them get on their feet in their adopted country.

Mr. Trump’s executive order halted funding to nonprofits like the International Rescue Committee and HIAS, which used to provide services such as rental assistance and job placement to refugees and Afghan allies for at least 90 days after their arrival.No One Left Behind has partnered with community organizations and volunteers in cities like Portland, Rochester, N.Y., and Sacramento to fill the void.

Mr. Jafari’s family is living in an Extended Stay America hotel outside Portland while he waits for an apartment to be leased for his family. Rent will be paid by No One Left Behind and a local group, the Afghan Support Network, until Mr. Jafari becomes self-sufficient.

“I am so glad that I arrived in America,” he said. “I want to work hard for my family to have a good and bright future.”

Alain Delaquérière contributed research.

Miriam Jordan reports from a grass roots perspective on immigrants and their impact on the demographics, society and economy of the United States

Veterans Race to Bring Afghan Allies to U.S. Before Trump Travel Ban
read more

Save the Children: 18 Health Centers Closed in Afghanistan

In a report, the organization stated that it has also suspended life-saving programs for malnourished children due to funding cuts.

Save the Children has announced the closure of 18 health centers in Afghanistan and added that 14 more will be shut down in the coming month due to a reduction in foreign aid.

In a report, the organization stated that it has also suspended life-saving programs for malnourished children due to funding cuts.

The report reads: “In Afghanistan, the loss of funding has already led to the closure of 18 health facilities supported by Save the Children and its partner. Only 14 Save the Children clinics have enough funding to remain open for one more month, and without new financial support, they will be forced to close. These 32 clinics supported over 134,000 children in January alone.”

Save the Children has urged world leaders, partners, and people across the globe to financially invest in children and their future.

Meanwhile, families of malnourished children are deeply concerned about the situation.

“We took our child to the doctor. The doctor said he is severely underweight and in the red zone. Later, they provided some supplies for our child, and now he is slightly better,” Lalagul, the father of a sick child, told TOLOnews.

“This situation will lead to an increase in infectious diseases, worsening malnutrition, and a severe decline in maternal and newborn care. Ultimately, these factors will heighten the risk of maternal and infant mortality in the country,” said Rohullah Haris, a doctor in Kabul.

This comes as the US President has signed an executive order suspending US foreign aid for three months. Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Monday that 83% of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) budget has been revoked following a six-week review.

Save the Children: 18 Health Centers Closed in Afghanistan
read more

Remarks by Ambassador Dorothy Shea, Chargé d’Affaires, at a UN Security Council Briefing on Afghanistan

 

AS DELIVERED
Thank you, Madam President, and thank you SRSG Roza Otunbayeva for your briefing. I would also like to thank Ms. Azadah Raz Mohammad for your remarks and I welcome the representative of Afghanistan.
We recognize the work of the UNAMA team, in very challenging conditions, to support the people of Afghanistan. UNAMA coordinates the provision of humanitarian assistance to the Afghan people; promotes good governance; and reports on the political and social developments in Afghanistan, including on human rights.
The security threat emanating from Afghanistan is a continuing driver of regional instability. The United States notes that, in February, the UN’s 1267 Monitoring Team echoed these concerns.
We are also concerned about the transnational threat posed by ISIS-K. We call on the Taliban to abide by their counterterrorism commitments.
The Taliban must ensure Afghanistan can never again be used as a safe haven for terrorist groups to threaten the security of the United States, our allies, or any country.
Madam President, colleagues, Afghanistan cannot achieve self-reliance and stability so long as the Afghan people remain subject to oppressive Taliban restrictions that strangle the economy. The situation for Afghan women and girls is particularly devastating given the over 80 edicts directly targeting their access to education, commercial activities, and overall participation in the economy. Furthermore, the December ban on women attending medical institutes will have dire consequences for all Afghans. The UN must be a stronger voice of the international community in pressing the Taliban to change course.
Over 22 million Afghans rely on emergency humanitarian assistance, making Afghanistan one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world. The Taliban’s repressive policies and Afghanistan’s struggling economy are drivers of human displacement, which strains the region’s limited resources and contributes to further destabilization.
The United States is skeptical of the Taliban’s willingness to engage in good faith in the Doha Process. We cannot build confidence with a group that unjustly detains Americans, has a long history of harboring terrorist groups on its soil, and ignores the basic rights and needs of its own people.
We look forward to working with members of this Council to maintain consensus on our collective demand that the Taliban act responsibly.
I thank you.

 

Remarks by Ambassador Dorothy Shea, Chargé d’Affaires, at a UN Security Council Briefing on Afghanistan
read more

Iran Ready to Cooperate on Afghanistan’s Security

While he did not provide further details, Baghaei emphasized in a press conference that discussions with the Islamic Emirate on this matter are ongoing.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, said that Tehran is ready to collaborate with the Islamic Emirate to ensure Afghanistan’s security.

While he did not provide further details, Baghaei emphasized in a press conference that discussions with the Islamic Emirate on this matter are ongoing. He expressed hope that these talks, based on a shared understanding of the importance of bilateral relations, would lead to tangible and effective outcomes.

“We are ready to cooperate in achieving lasting security and stability in our neighboring country, Afghanistan. A country’s foreign policy is not determined or changed by the replacement of one or two individuals. Foreign policy, including relations with neighbors, is formulated within well-defined frameworks and clear processes,” Baghaei told reporters.

Meanwhile, some political analysts believe that although Iran has not yet officially recognized the Islamic Emirate, it has strengthened diplomatic relations with the caretaker government. Iran is among the countries that have handed over Afghanistan’s diplomatic mission to the Islamic Emirate.

Political analyst Sayed Akbar Sial Wardak told TOLOnews: “Iran’s economic, political, commercial, and diplomatic ties with Afghanistan are moving in a positive direction. However, its decision not to recognize the Islamic Emirate so far is linked to global politics and US influence. Regional countries fear that recognizing the Taliban could lead to international pressure.”

Previously, Iran’s Foreign Minister visited Kabul and met with senior officials of the Islamic Emirate to discuss border issues, water rights, counterterrorism efforts against ISIS, economic cooperation, drug trafficking, and shared security concerns.

Iran Ready to Cooperate on Afghanistan’s Security
read more

Greenland and Afghanistan: Frontiers in race for critical minerals

Voice of America

March 07, 2025

Critical minerals are seen as strategically crucial for modern economies, and Greenland and Afghanistan are believed to be rich in untapped reserves.
Critical minerals are seen as strategically crucial for modern economies, and Greenland and Afghanistan are believed to be rich in untapped reserves.

Where mineral resources are located and extracted has often played a major role in geopolitical and economic relations. Today, the world’s attention is turning to two places believed to be rich in untapped reserves — but accessing each of them comes with unique challenges.

Afghanistan

Sitting at the intersection of multiple tectonic plates, Afghanistan’s geology has resulted in extensive and diverse mineral deposits. Historically, its territory was a primary source of copper and gold as well as gems and semiprecious stones, particularly lapis lazuli, a stone prized for its intense blue color.

Today, Afghanistan is estimated to hold nearly $1 trillion worth of mineral reserves. This includes 60 million tons of copper, 183 million tons of aluminum and 2.2 billion tons of iron ore. Gold is mined on an artisanal scale in the northern and eastern provinces, while the mountainous north contains valuable marble and limestone deposits used in construction.

The China National Petroleum Corporation also pumps oil in the north, though Afghanistan has no domestic refining capability and is reliant on neighbors such as Turkmenistan, Iran and Kyrgyzstan for fuel.

Most of the international focus, however, is on Afghanistan’s other metal deposits, many of which are crucial to emerging technologies. These include cobalt, lithium and niobium, used in batteries and other electronics. The country’s unexplored lithium reserves may even exceed those of Bolivia, currently the world’s largest.

Afghanistan also holds major deposits of rare earth metals like lanthanum, cerium and neodymium, which are used for magnets and semiconductors as well as other specialized manufacturing applications.

One obstacle to extracting Afghanistan’s minerals is its terrain, considered the eighth most mountainous in the world. But security has been a much bigger impediment. Amid the political instability that followed the first fall of the Taliban in 2001, many gemstone and copper mines operated illegally under the command of local militants. With workers paid very little and the product smuggled out to be sold in neighboring Pakistan, the Afghan people saw little benefit from these extraction operations.

Since retaking power in 2021, the Taliban, who have been eager to make use of the country’s mineral wealth and increase exports, are hampered by a lack of diplomatic recognition and their designation as a terrorist group by multiple nations. This is, however, beginning to change, as some countries establish de facto diplomatic ties.

In 2024, the Taliban government’s resource ministry announced that it had secured investments from China, Qatar, Turkey, Iran and the United Kingdom. China, which was the first nation to accredit a Taliban-appointed ambassador, is expected to be a major player in Afghanistan’s extractive industries as part of its Belt and Road Initiative.

However, as newly discovered deposits require an average of 16 years to develop into operational mines, harnessing Afghanistan’s mineral potential will take a great deal of investment and time — if the political and security issues can somehow be worked out.

Greenland

For millions of years, Greenland has been mostly covered by an ice sheet, habitable only along coastal areas. Despite some offshore petroleum and gas exploration, fishing and whaling have remained the primary nongovernment industries.

Now, as ice recedes amid climate change, the large island’s frozen interior offers new opportunities in untapped mineral resources. These include more common metals such as copper and gold, as well as titanium and graphite. But as elsewhere, there is even greater interest in Greenland’s deposits of technology-critical minerals.

The autonomous Danish territory is estimated to contain deposits of 43 of the 50 minerals designated by the United States as crucial to national security. Among these are the sought-after rare earth metals, in addition to other metals with technological applications such as vanadium and chromium.

Currently, a majority of the world’s rare earth metals are mined in China, making Greenland’s deposits vital for countries seeking to reduce their dependence on Chinese imports. This strategic importance is one of the factors that led U.S. President Donald Trump to propose buying Greenland from Denmark.

Greenland’s government has issued nearly 100 mining licenses to companies like KoBold Metals and Rio Tinto. But these have mostly involved exploration, with only two mines currently operating in the country. Getting a mine to production can take as long as a decade, because it involves several unique challenges.

One such hurdle is Greenland’s strong environmentalist movement, which has successfully shut down mining projects for safety concerns. Rare earths pose a particular issue, because they must be extracted from other ores — a process that can cause waste and pollution. At the Kvanefjeld site in the south, metals were to be extracted from uranium ore until the fear of radioactive pollution led to a ban.

The receding ice and warming climate have made extraction easier not only by revealing more territory but also by extending possible working hours and easing ship navigation. However, the environment remains harsh and inhospitable, and the island suffers from a lack of infrastructure, with few roads or energy facilities outside major settlements. Nevertheless, Greenland’s government considers the mining industry to be an important means of developing the economy.

Conclusion

Shaped by both politics and geography, Greenland and Afghanistan have become two major frontiers in the global scramble for critical minerals. Which parties will have the opportunity to benefit from their resources will depend on the interplay of military power, economics and diplomacy.

Greenland and Afghanistan: Frontiers in race for critical minerals
read more

UK backs referring Taliban to International Court, urges progress on women’s rights

Khaama Press

11 March 2025

The United Kingdom has expressed support for referring the Taliban to the International Court of Justice for accountability on their actions.

James Kariuki, Deputy Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United Nations Security Council, expressed the UK’s support for referring the Taliban to the International Court of Justice for addressing concerns about their actions.

On Monday, March 10, Kariuki reiterated the UK’s opposition to the restrictions imposed on Afghanistan’s women and girls, highlighting the importance of upholding their rights and freedoms in Afghanistan.

Kariuki emphasized that the international community should address the issue of gender-based violence, and that the Taliban must respond to concerns raised by human rights organizations regarding their treatment of women.

He shared these remarks during a United Nations Security Council meeting on Afghanistan, stressing the need for international cooperation in addressing the challenges faced by the Afghanistan population under the current regime.

The statement also included that, for the Taliban to be integrated into the international community, they must demonstrate a commitment to human rights, political participation, and counterterrorism measures.

Meanwhile, Roza Otunbayeva, the UN Special Representative for Afghanistan, mentioned that the Taliban has not shown significant political progress, which continues to hinder Afghanistan’s potential for broader engagement on the world stage.

The UN Security Council meeting ended with strong expressions of concern regarding the ongoing situation in Afghanistan, highlighting the international community’s desire for progress on human rights and political inclusion. The lack of substantial political advancements under the Taliban’s leadership remains a key issue.

Meanwhile, the international community seeks continued dialogue and cooperation to support the Afghanistan population, while encouraging the Taliban to take tangible steps toward fulfilling their international obligations and fostering a more inclusive governance model.

UK backs referring Taliban to International Court, urges progress on women’s rights
read more

Over 22.9 million people in Afghanistan need urgent aid, says Iran’s UN Ambassador

Iran’s UN Ambassador, Iravani, has highlighted that over 22.9 million people in Afghanistan urgently require assistance due to the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

Amir Saeed Iravani, the Ambassador and Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations, stated that Afghanistan is facing one of the worst humanitarian crises globally, with over 22.9 million people in need of urgent assistance. He emphasized the severity of the situation and the growing demand for international support.

Iravani further reported that the humanitarian response plan for 2025 requires $2.42 billion in funding, yet the financial contributions have remained alarmingly low. He urged that humanitarian aid should be impartial and unconditional to ensure that it reaches those in need without any obstacles, stressing the importance of continued assistance to Afghanistan.

Despite claims by the Taliban regarding economic growth, Afghanistan’s economy remains fragile and unstable according to reputable international economic institutions. Reports indicate widespread poverty, a vulnerable economy, and an uncertain economic future, with the country facing severe economic challenges over the past three years.

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres also noted earlier on March that although intense conflict has subsided in the past three years, Afghanistan’s economy continues to be fragile. This underscores the ongoing difficulties faced by the Afghanistan people and the need for sustained international support to stabilize the nation’s economy and provide much-needed relief.

Afghanistan’s crisis remains dire, and international aid must increase to meet the rising humanitarian needs. The international community must ensure that assistance continues to flow without interruption and reach those who are most vulnerable.

Over 22.9 million people in Afghanistan need urgent aid, says Iran’s UN Ambassador
read more

Germany Evaluating Engagement with the Islamic Emirate

The caretaker government in Afghanistan has expressed its willingness to maintain positive and mutually beneficial relations with Germany.

Bruno Kahl, president of the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND), in an interview with a German media outlet said that the agency is working on how to establish engagement with Afghanistan’s caretaker government.

According to Kahl, the BND gathers intelligence from Afghanistan to assist the German federal government in making informed decisions regarding its approach toward the Islamic Emirate.

”We as intelligence services must obtain the information that’s important so that this federal government can make the appropriate decisions, and we do get from the particular region as well, and then the federal government old or new has to decide how it wants to deal with the de facto government in Afghanistan,” he said.

Meanwhile, the caretaker government in Afghanistan has expressed its willingness to maintain positive and mutually beneficial relations with Germany.

Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, said: “Afghanistan seeks good relations with all countries, including Germany, which has historically maintained strong ties with Afghanistan. Both nations aim to protect their people’s interests through positive engagement.”

Political analyst Zalmai Afghan Yar commented: “All countries establish relations based on their national interests. Germany’s effort to find a mechanism for engagement is a positive step that could help Afghanistan break out of isolation.”

Kahl’s remarks on assessing engagement with the Islamic Emirate come as some German politicians have previously suggested that Berlin should negotiate directly with Afghanistan’s current government regarding Afghan migrants in Germany.

Meanwhile, Germany is expected to form a new government by the end of March.

Germany Evaluating Engagement with the Islamic Emirate
read more

Fitrat: UN Should Make Decisions ‘Independently’

TOLOnews

TV Network

11 March 2025

The human rights situation, particularly women’s issues in Afghanistan, was another key topic of the meeting.

Hamdullah Fitrat, the deputy spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate, responded to the UN Security Council meeting, stating that the caretaker government has consistently sought to engage with the international community.

According to Fitrat, some countries attempt to create obstacles in this process. “Unfortunately, some countries create barriers in this regard. It is up to the UN to make sound decisions independently and not under the influence of major powers. If this happens, Afghanistan can regain its rightful place on the global stage and reclaim its seat at the UN,” he said.

During last night’s Security Council meeting, discussions focused on counterterrorism efforts, the formation of an inclusive government, and the protection of human rights in Afghanistan. Representatives from Russia, China, Pakistan, the United States, and other countries called for concrete actions by the caretaker government in the fight against terrorism.

Dorothy Shea, the U.S. representative to the UN, said: “We are also concerned about the transnational threat posed by ISIS-K. We call on the Taliban to abide by their counterterrorism commitments. The Taliban must ensure Afghanistan can never again be used as a safe haven for terrorist groups to threaten the security of the United States, our allies, or any country.”

The representatives of China and Russia, in addition to discussing these issues, called for the lifting of travel sanctions on Islamic Emirate officials and emphasized the importance of forming an inclusive government in Afghanistan.

Vassily Nebenzia, Russia’s UN representative, remarked: “Among other imperatives is shaping a truly inclusive Government with the participation of all ethno-political groups in the country. We hope to see positive momentum on both fronts.”

Fu Cong, China’s permanent representative to the UN, said during the Security Council meeting: “China reiterates that the Council should reinstate its package of exemptions to the travel ban imposed on the relevant personnel of the Afghan interim government, and timely adjust the 1988 sanctions regime, so as to facilitate the external engagement of the interim government.”

The human rights situation, particularly women’s issues in Afghanistan, was another key topic of the meeting.

“This remains vital whilst Afghans – especially women and girls – continue to suffer under a series of oppressive restrictions. At the time, members of the Taliban claimed that the March 2022 ban on secondary education for girls was temporary. Almost three years on, girls in Afghanistan continue to be denied their right to education,” said James Kariuki, the UK’s deputy permanent representative to the UN.

At the end of the meeting, nine countries issued a joint statement under the theme Women, Peace, and Security in Afghanistan, expressing concern over the situation of women and supporting the extension of the UNAMA mandate.

Fitrat: UN Should Make Decisions ‘Independently’
read more

Otunbayeva: Is the Govt Ready for Global Integration?

The head of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), Roza Otunbayeva, presented a report on the situation in Afghanistan to the UN Security Council last night (March 10).

Otunbayeva emphasized in the report that the current authorities of the interim government should clarify whether they want to integrate with the international community or not.

“It is the responsibility of the de facto authorities to indicate whether they want Afghanistan to be reintegrated into the international system and, if so, whether they are willing to take the necessary steps,” said Otunbayeva.

Otunbayeva also highlighted concerns regarding the possible conclusion of UNAMA’s mission in Afghanistan, warning that the situation would further deteriorate.

The UN representative stated that she hopes UNAMA’s mandate in Afghanistan will be extended next week.

In the report, Otunbayeva claimed that Afghans fear increased isolation and marginalization, and the reduction of humanitarian aid is another major concern for them.

“In 2025, more than 50 percent of the population — some 23 million people — require humanitarian assistance. But this assistance is rapidly decreasing. The defunding of assistance is already having and will continue to have a significant impact on the Afghan people. In the past month, more than 200 health facilities have closed,” she said.

Otunbayeva said that essential malnutrition services for children have been limited, and implementing partners have significantly reduced their footprint and coordination capacity.

The head of UNAMA said that the Afghan economy grew around 2.7 percent in 2024. Investments, especially in infrastructure, supported by regional countries, are taking place, but in the short- and medium-term current levels of growth cannot compensate for the drop in foreign aid and the growing population, she said.
She also mentioned the closure of medical institutes for girls, stating that it has further worsened the healthcare situation.

“This new restriction deepens a long-term gap in the country’s capacity to protect the
health of women and indeed all Afghans. This will further worsen maternal and infant mortality in Afghanistan, already one of the highest in the world,” she stated.

She called on the international community to support the caretaker government in cultivating alternatives to poppy cultivation.

The head of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) makes these remarks as the mission is set to conclude on March 17 of this year. So far, the Security Council has not clarified its stance on extending or terminating the mission.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has also not yet reacted to these statements.

Otunbayeva: Is the Govt Ready for Global Integration?
read more