Getting married, with 49 other couples 

The Daily Hustle

Rohullah Sorush • Roxanna Shapour

Afghanistan Analysts Network

  print sharing button

For many young Afghans, the dream of getting married and starting a family is stymied by a myriad obstacles on the road to their hoped-for nuptials. One of the main barriers is the high cost of weddings and the steep bride price that many fathers ask for in exchange for their daughter’s hand in marriage. In recent years, some charities have stepped in to help young men overcome the financial demands of getting married by sponsoring group weddings. In this instalment of the Daily Hustle, Rohullah Sorush hears from an Afghan man about how he and his wife found themselves getting married in a group ceremony alongside 49 other couples. 

A rocky start in life 

My name is Ghulam. I was born in Kabul’s Kart-e Sakhi neighbourhood in 1983 during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. I only went to school until third grade. Back then, with the civil war raging, times were tough, and when I was ten years old, I had to go to work to help support my family. At first, I got a job in a small baked goods factory, later moving to a rug-weaving workshop, where the pay was slightly better.

In 2000, I went to Iran to find work. I got a job in a metal workshop. I worked there for eight years, honing my skills as a metalworker. The shop did a brisk business and I made good money. I kept some of my earnings for my own expenses and sent the rest home to my mother. Sadly, we lost my father while I was in Iran, which made me the main provider for my mother and two brothers, who were still young and I wanted them to stay in school.

Time to start a family 

When I came back to Kabul, I opened a small metal workshop in the Kot-e Sangi area, with the little money my mother had been saving from my earnings in Iran. I made metal doors, windows and other things people needed for their homes. The shop gave me a living and I could support my family. My mother kept nagging me to get married. She said it was time for me to start a family of my own, and she set out to find me a suitable girl. Finally, after considering several young women, she settled on a lovely girl from a good family and I got engaged. But getting engaged is one thing and actually getting married is something else.

It’s not unusual for Afghans to get engaged and stay engaged for several years, because they can’t afford to get married. I wasn’t any different. First, I had to pay a bride price to my father-in-law, which I couldn’t afford. Then, it was the cost of having a wedding, because in Afghanistan, you have to invite many guests. It’s not just close relatives and friends; you must invite members of your tribe whose weddings you yourself have attended. Even a small wedding typically involves about 500 guests. Larger weddings can exceed 1,000. At the very least, you have to hire a wedding hall and pay for food for all the guests.

My perpetual engagement 

Four years after I got engaged, I still hadn’t saved money enough to get married. My fiancée and her family were getting impatient. My father-in-law was asking for 250,000 afghani [about 3,600 USD] as a bride price and I had calculated that it would cost another 500,000 afghani [about 7,000 USD] for a small wedding. I really couldn’t see how I’d come up with 750,000 afghani [about 11,000 USD], even if I worked all the hours God sent.

I told my father-in-law about my financial troubles. He said he’d reduce the bride price to 50,000 afghani [about 700 USD]. I asked a friend for a loan. He didn’t have the money but introduced me to someone who I could borrow money from. I went to the man and we agreed that he’d give me the funds, which I’d then pay back within six months. But when I went to my father-in-law with the money, he’d changed his mind. He said he wouldn’t accept any amount lower than what he’d originally asked for. So I returned the money to the man who had lent it to me. My wedding was now postponed indefinitely.

A resolution at last 

Another two years went by and I was still no closer to having saved enough to get married. I spoke to my fiancée and told her I didn’t think I’d ever save enough money for us to get married the way her family wanted us to. I was saving as much as I could, but I still had to support my family and everything, including weddings, was getting more expensive by the day.

One day, a friend told me about the Abul Fazl ul-Abbas Social and Cultural Foundation. He said they supported couples who wanted to get married, but didn’t have the financial means to do so. He said they did this by organising group weddings, which they pay for. So one day I went to the foundation’s office and talked to the people there about the possibility of taking part in one of their group weddings. Later that day, I raised the idea with my fiancée.

We decided that she’d get her family to agree to a group wedding, but when she first raised the idea with them, her uncle opposed it. He said they’d attended the weddings of many relatives and it was time for them to return the hospitality by hosting a wedding. But she wouldn’t give up. She kept bringing it up every few days until her parents finally relented and agreed. It felt like a miracle.

I went back to the foundation and told them I wanted to take part in one of their group weddings. They talked me through their selection procedure and said they’d need to first do some checks. They’d be in touch, they said, and if I met all the conditions, we could take part in one of their group wedding ceremonies.

Qualifying for a group wedding 

The Abul Fazl ul-Abbas Foundation doesn’t just accept anyone who asks to be married in a group wedding. They have strict guidelines for who can qualify. First, they must speak to the couple and their families to ensure everyone agrees. Second, they need to confirm that the groom isn’t already married. Lastly, they will investigate the groom’s financial situation to make sure he genuinely lacks the means to pay for a wedding, for example, that he doesn’t own any property that he could sell to pay for his wedding.

I wasn’t worried. I knew I met all their conditions. They came to my home and talked to my mother. She told them that my father had died and I supported the family. They saw the rented rooms we lived in. They met my in-laws to make sure they’d be happy with their daughter getting married in a group wedding.

Finally, they agreed to accept us. Before the wedding, we had to attend several meetings where they talked to us about what it means to be married, including the rights of a husband and the rights of a wife.

Finally, the big day 

50 couples got married during our wedding event. The foundation had given each couple 50 invitation cards so that family and friends could join us for the occasion. Our wedding was in the evening, but another 50 couples were set to marry during a lunch ceremony the following day.

Everyone was dressed the same, because the foundation had given each bride a wedding dress, veil, and shoes, and each groom a suit, shirt, socks and shoes. There were also wedding presents for every couple to help them as they started their new life together – a nine-metre rug, a set of dishes for a family of four, a pressure cooker and a gas heater.

They did the nekah [marriage contract] before the ceremony so that the couples are mahram to each other and don’t have problems sitting together, talking and holding each other’s hands. The event itself was a celebration for friends and family – a public declaration of our marriage. The atmosphere was festive. Although there was no music, there were people who recited religious poetry. A simple dinner of traditional Afghan rice was served, but nothing else alongside the main dish – no fruit or vegetables. Each couple also got their own wedding cake. We took our cake home to share with family and friends.

We couldn’t afford to host any parties, like a pre-wedding henna night, but our families gathered at our house after the wedding to celebrate. They threw noql [a traditional sweet] and chocolate as we got out of the car and we had a simple gathering with our wedding cake and tea. The day after the wedding my in-laws visited for the takht jami (post-wedding party). We had a simple dinner and they brought gifts for my wife

Happily ever after 

It’s been five years since my wife and I got married along with those 49 other couples in a group wedding. We have a happy home and are blessed with two children. Sometimes, I ask her if she regrets forgoing a big wedding. “Not for a moment”, she says. “I decided to start my life with you, and I’ve never looked back. Look at the life we have now, look at our amazing children. If I’d held out for a big wedding, we might still be waiting for you to save up.”

Edited by Roxanna Shapour

Getting married, with 49 other couples 
read more

Classifying Taliban as ‘foreign terrorist organization’ under review: US

Al Jazeera

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that the United States is reviewing whether to designate Afghanistan’s rulers, the Taliban, as a “foreign terrorist organization”.

Rubio told the House Foreign Affairs Committee during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday, “I believe that classification is now, once again, under review.”

The response came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a “comprehensive review” of the United States’s chaotic military withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, an evacuation operation in which 13 US service members and 150 Afghans were killed at Kabul’s airport in an ISIL (ISIS) bombing.

Hegseth said in a memo on Tuesday that after three months of assessing the withdrawal, a comprehensive review was needed to ensure accountability for this event.

“This remains an important step toward regaining faith and trust with the American people and all those who wear the uniform, and is prudent based on the number of casualties and equipment lost during the execution of this withdrawal operation,” Hegseth wrote.

Trump had signed the deal with the Taliban in Doha in February 2020 aimed at ending its 18-year war in Afghanistan, beginning with the withdrawal of about 4,000 troops “within months”.

The then-Trump administration had agreed it would withdraw from the country by May 2021 if the Taliban negotiated a peace agreement with the Afghan government and promised to prevent internationally designated terrorist groups, such as al-Qaeda and ISIL, from gaining a foothold in the country.

After assuming office in January 2021, Biden said he had to respect the agreement or risk new conflicts with the Taliban, which could have required additional troops in Afghanistan.

On the 2024 campaign trail, Trump frequently criticised Biden and his administration for the withdrawal, saying that the manner in which it was done “was the most embarrassing day in the history of our country’s life.” Trump said that the withdrawal should have been done with “dignity, with strength, with power.”

Senior US military officials, including then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and the then-top US general, Mark Milley, have already appeared before lawmakers to give their testimonies regarding the withdrawal.

The war in Afghanistan from 2001-2021 was the US’s longest war, surpassing Vietnam.

It remains unclear how Hegseth’s review would differ from the many previous reviews carried out by the US military, Department of State and Trump’s fellow Republicans in the House of Representatives.

US Central Command, which oversees operations in the Middle East, has also carried out an investigation into the ISIL attack on Kabul during the last few days of the withdrawal.

Source: News Agencies
Classifying Taliban as ‘foreign terrorist organization’ under review: US
read more

Hegseth Orders a New Review of U.S. Withdrawal From Afghanistan

The defense secretary’s decision to select his chief spokesman to lead the inquiry into the chaotic end of the war was highly unusual.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Tuesday that he had directed his chief spokesman to convene a panel to review the U.S. military’s chaotic 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan and to ensure that senior military officials were held accountable.

In a memo to senior Pentagon leaders, Mr. Hegseth said that the department had been reviewing the operation that led to the deaths of 13 U.S. troops and 170 civilians at Kabul International Airport. He suggested that the effort led by Sean Parnell, the Pentagon’s assistant to the secretary of defense for public affairs, would be more comprehensive than previous reviews.

Mr. Hegseth’s selection of his chief spokesman to conduct such an inquiry was highly unusual and appeared to reflect a skepticism that uniformed military leaders would hold each other accountable.

Mr. Parnell served in Afghanistan for 16 months in 2006 and 2007 as a platoon leader in Paktika Province, near Pakistan’s border, where he was wounded in combat. A news release announcing the review noted that he “lost countless friends to the war on terror.”

“I want to say this very strongly,” Colonel Scheller said in a video he recorded only hours after the deaths. “I have been fighting for 17 years. I am willing to throw it all away to say to my senior leaders: I demand accountability.”

He was reprimanded by a military judge and ordered to forfeit $5,000 in pay.

In his video, Colonel Scheller criticized the military’s senior leaders for closing Bagram Air Base, a large, secure facility about 25 miles from Kabul, and for relying entirely on a more vulnerable, civilian airport for the high-stakes evacuation.

“Did any of you throw your rank on the table and say, ‘Hey, it’s a bad idea to evacuate Bagram airfield’?” he asked.

Mr. Hegseth largely blamed the Biden administration for the poorly executed end to the war, and seemed to suggest, much as Colonel Scheller did in his video, that uniformed military leaders should have resigned in protest rather than carry out the flawed withdrawal plan.

But the review’s narrow scope likely will not include the decisions that led up to the withdrawal, such as the deal President Trump and his first administration made with the Taliban in February 2020. That agreement set a hard deadline for America’s retreat from Afghanistan after nearly two decades of war.

Nor does it seem likely that the review will look into the sudden collapse of the Afghan military after tens of billions of dollars in support from the Pentagon. Civilian and military leaders spanning four presidencies touted the growing strength and progress of the Afghan forces only to see them collapse in a matter of weeks as the U.S. military was leaving.

Hegseth Orders a New Review of U.S. Withdrawal From Afghanistan
read more

CSTO Member States to begin sending Weapons to Afghanistan Border

Khaama Press

 

CSTO countries will start delivering weapons and military equipment to strengthen the Afghanistan border, enhancing regional security and response.

Imangali Tasmagambetov, Secretary-General of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), announced at the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly that the dispatch of weapons and military equipment to strengthen Tajikistan’s border with Afghanistan will begin soon. This plan aims to counter security threats stemming from Afghanistan and reduce border vulnerabilities.

The program, approved in 2024 in Astana, Kazakhstan, is set to be officially implemented in three phases starting in 2026. CSTO member states—including Russia, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, and Belarus—will prepare to respond rapidly to cross-border threats originating from Afghanistan, enhancing regional security cooperation.

The plan includes bolstering military infrastructure in southern Tajikistan and increasing the rapid response capabilities of CSTO forces. Concerns have escalated in the region due to the presence of terrorist groups such as ISIS and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, especially following the Taliban’s return to power in 2021.

Tajikistan, which shares over 1,400 kilometers of border with Afghanistan, has repeatedly warned of extremist infiltration risks. Several Central Asian countries have conducted joint military drills near the Afghan border to enhance readiness and cooperation against growing threats from over 20 active terrorist organizations within Afghanistan.

While the Taliban administration of Afghanistan claims it does not permit foreign militant groups to operate from its territory, regional reports highlight escalating insecurity and drug trafficking, increasing concerns among neighboring states.

Experts view the CSTO initiative as a strategic move to establish a “security belt” around Afghanistan, a concept previously proposed by Tajikistan’s president. This security framework seeks to stabilize the region amid persistent instability and transnational threats.

The CSTO’s efforts to fortify borders reflect a broader regional push to mitigate risks stemming from Afghanistan’s ongoing turmoil. With international actors focusing on counterterrorism and border security, the success of such measures will depend on sustained cooperation and political will among Central Asian nations and global partners.

CSTO Member States to begin sending Weapons to Afghanistan Border
read more

Beijing pledges Development Aid amid Kabul’s push for stronger economic ties

Khaama Press

Beijing has pledged development aid to Kabul, focusing on health, agriculture, and energy as both sides seek stronger economic ties.

Acting Foreign Minister of the Taliban administration, Amir Khan Muttaqi, met with Luo Zhaohui, head of China’s International Development Cooperation Agency (CIDCA), on Thursday, May 22, to discuss bilateral cooperation and China’s role in Afghanistan’s reconstruction. The high-level meeting marks another step in China’s increasing engagement in Afghanistan following the withdrawal of Western forces.

Muttaqi expressed hope for deeper collaboration between Kabul and Beijing, especially in the sectors of agriculture, energy, and long-term infrastructure development. He described China as a vital development partner in rebuilding the country’s economy and public services.

According to Hafiz Zia Ahmad Takal, deputy spokesperson of the Taliban’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Chinese official pledged development assistance in healthcare, agriculture, infrastructure, and energy. He also expressed interest in launching feasibility studies for oil and gas exploration, and supporting capacity-building initiatives.

Chen Xiaodong, the head of China’s development agency, reiterated these commitments during the meeting, promising that China would support Afghanistan’s recovery through technical and financial cooperation. Takal added that Muttaqi presented specific proposals to CIDCA outlining areas where China’s support could accelerate Afghanistan’s reconstruction efforts.

The talks come amid broader Chinese diplomatic activity in the region. Muttaqi had previously met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to discuss enhancing political and economic ties between the two nations.

Analysts say China’s expanding role in Afghanistan reflects a strategic bid to ensure regional stability and secure its interests in connectivity, energy, and trade. The country’s geographic position makes it a key corridor for the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its potential linkages to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

However, experts warn that without broader international recognition and domestic inclusivity, Afghanistan’s development progress may face limitations. While China’s involvement signals a shift in regional dynamics, the sustainability of such support remains uncertain in the face of persistent security and governance challenges.

According to Zia Ahmad Takal, spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Chinese delegation pledged support in various areas including healthcare, infrastructure, oil and gas exploration feasibility studies, and professional training programs for Afghan institutions.

Beijing pledges Development Aid amid Kabul’s push for stronger economic ties
read more

US aid suspension severely impacts humanitarian operations in Afghanistan: UN OCHA

By Fidel Rahmati

The suspension of U.S. aid has disrupted Afghanistan’s humanitarian operations, leaving millions without healthcare and risking a worsening crisis.

The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has warned that the suspension of U.S. funding has had devastating consequences for humanitarian operations in Afghanistan, leaving over 1.6 million people without access to essential healthcare services.

According to OCHA’s latest report released on Thursday, May 22, 188 health centers across Afghanistan were forced to shut down by the end of February 2025 due to funding shortages. This closure has deprived more than 1.6 million individuals of crucial health services, particularly in remote and underserved areas.

The report also highlights that approximately 1,700 female health workers and demining staff lost their jobs as a result of the funding cuts. The layoffs have had a particularly harsh impact on women and their families, further exacerbating gender-based vulnerabilities under the current economic and political conditions in the country.

OCHA emphasized the critical role that U.S. humanitarian aid played in previous years. In 2021 and 2022, U.S. contributions were instrumental in averting widespread famine by focusing on food security and supporting emergency interventions during peak crises.

In 2024 alone, the U.S. provided $735.7 million—about 47% of the total humanitarian budget for Afghanistan—making it the largest donor. This support enabled humanitarian agencies to deliver at least one form of life-saving assistance to 20.4 million Afghans, including comprehensive aid to 3.4 million people, 29% of whom were women.

However, the abrupt halt in U.S. funding for 2025 has disrupted procurement cycles and preparedness activities ahead of seasonal emergencies. OCHA cautions that without alternative funding to fill this gap, millions could be pushed toward hunger and deprivation.

OCHA urged the international community to step in and fill the funding void. “The humanitarian situation in Afghanistan remains dire,” the report stated, “and without timely support, the cost in human suffering will be immeasurable.”

Multiple aid organizations, including the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), have echoed similar concerns in recent months, underscoring the need for sustained funding and access to ensure aid delivery amid mounting needs and operational challenges.

US aid suspension severely impacts humanitarian operations in Afghanistan: UN OCHA
read more

Poverty, Unemployment Remain Fundamental Concerns in Afghanistan

According to the report, 3.6 million people in Afghanistan faced severe food insecurity last year.

Poverty and unemployment are fundamental issues in Afghanistan that are consistently raised by both citizens and the international community.

Some residents of Kabul describe poverty and joblessness as their current economic challenges and call on authorities to create employment opportunities.

Sayed Jamal, a resident of Kabul, said: “Our request of the Islamic Emirate government is to provide job opportunities so that people can overcome their economic difficulties and earn a lawful living for their families.”

Meanwhile, the World Food Programme (WFP) stated in a report that Afghanistan ranked among the nine countries with the highest levels of food insecurity globally in the past year, second only to Sudan.

According to the report, 3.6 million people in Afghanistan faced severe food insecurity last year.

Abdul Nasir Rashtia, an economic analyst, said: “The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan needs to implement a series of strategic programs and plans to eliminate poverty and unemployment. For example, by collecting national revenues, they could initiate developmental and infrastructure projects that would create job opportunities and provide people with a steady income.”

However, according to the Ministry of Economy, climate change and economic restrictions have negatively affected family life and the economy in Afghanistan, and improving the situation requires joint cooperation between the global community and the caretaker government.

Abdul Rahman Habib, spokesperson for the Ministry of Economy, said: “Currently, we are prioritizing support for agriculture and livestock sectors, boosting domestic production, reducing dependence on imports, and focusing on water management and infrastructure projects, so that we can strengthen the internal economy and fundamentally resolve food insecurity nationwide.”

Previously, the World Food Programme announced that 3 million people in Afghanistan would need life-saving food assistance in the upcoming summer. However, due to a lack of funding, it can only assist 1 million people to prevent catastrophic hunger.

Poverty, Unemployment Remain Fundamental Concerns in Afghanistan
read more

Race Against Time: Kabul’s Groundwater May Run Dry by 2030

Groundwater can be recharged, but more is drawn each year than is replenished in Kabul, with an estimated annual 76-million-cubic-meter deficit, experts say.

The Japan Times, in a report titled “Afghan capital losing race against water shortages,” stated that the situation in Kabul is clearly deteriorating.

The report, citing information and perspectives from several experts, mentioned that if no action is taken regarding Kabul’s groundwater, there will be no groundwater left in Kabul by 2030. It said that population growth has outstripped urban planning, and climate change drives below-average precipitation.

Referring to an international organization’s report, Japan Times notes that up to 80% of Kabul’s groundwater is contaminated and more than 100,000 unregulated wells extract water in the city, which are frequently drilled deeper.

Groundwater can be recharged, but more is drawn each year than is replenished in Kabul, with an estimated annual 76-million-cubic-meter deficit, experts say, according to the report.

The report also refers to the Islamic Emirate’s Ministry of Energy and Water’s plan to transfer water from the Panjshir River, stating that the project requires a budget of $300 to $400 million.

Race Against Time: Kabul’s Groundwater May Run Dry by 2030
read more

UNHCR Warns of Humanitarian Crisis Amid Mass Deportation of Afghan Migrants

He also warned of the negative consequences stemming from the sharp reduction in international assistance to deported migrants.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has voiced concern over the large-scale expulsion of Afghan migrants from neighboring countries at a time when humanitarian aid is drastically declining.

The UNHCR representative in Afghanistan Arafat Jamal highlighted that 380,000 Afghan migrants have been deported from neighboring countries just in the current year, stressing that Afghanistan is not prepared to accommodate such numbers.

He said: ” Three million Afghans have returned from neighboring countries since September 2023. This year alone, 380,000 have returned. They repatriate to a nation and a people that is welcoming them home, yet they return to a homeland that is dramatically unprepared to receive them. These past few months, I have traveled to all the main frontier crossings between Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq. I have witnessed a host nation that is embracing its long-exiled brethren, taking care of them, feeding them, and sheltering them.”

He also warned of the negative consequences stemming from the sharp reduction in international assistance to deported migrants.

According to the UN official, this situation could push Afghanistan into yet another crisis.

“Every dollar subtracted reduces a person’s ability to rebound. With the funding reductions, our current assistance package can be considered to be purely humanitarian, absolutely vital, but short-term and non-transformational. It can help someone to survive, but not to thrive. Even more starkly, perhaps, the budget cuts inhibit our ability to help those who take great personal risks to help the women of Afghanistan. Because against the odds, there are many, many people in this beautiful country who believe in their community and who strive to create conditions for women to get education, to work, or even simply to relax in a park with their companions,” Arafat Jamal added.

While the Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation speaks of its plans to address the challenges of deported migrants, it also emphasizes the importance of continued international support.

Abdul Mutalib Haqqani, spokesman for the Ministry, stated: “The Islamic Emirate is fully prepared for the return of migrants and has programs in place to meet their essential needs, including shelter and education. Partner countries and international humanitarian organizations should cooperate with the Islamic Emirate in implementing these programs.”

Mohammad Reza, an Afghan migrant in Pakistan, said: “House searches happen daily, many children are taken away, and even women without male guardians or heads of household are not spared, they are also taken to camps.”

Concerns over the consequences of slashed international aid for deported Afghan migrants continue to mount, as forced deportations from Pakistan and Iran remain ongoing at an intense pace.

UNHCR Warns of Humanitarian Crisis Amid Mass Deportation of Afghan Migrants
read more

Rubio: ‘Taliban’ Status ‘Under Review’ by Trump Administration

He emphasized that this decision would be made based on the future approach of the United States toward Afghanistan’s caretaker government.

Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, asked in a hearing if the “Taliban” were considered a foreign terrorist group, stated Washington is reviewing the status of the “Taliban.”

He emphasized that this decision would be made based on the future approach of the United States toward Afghanistan’s caretaker government.

Rubio said: “I believe that classification is now once again under review. As you know, we’ve had some success over the last few weeks in getting some Americans that were detained released, but we’ll have some decisions to make. That designation ultimately will be based on a holistic approach to what we think our future policy is going to be with regards to Afghanistan.”

The approach of Donald Trump regarding an agreement with the caretaker government on counter-terrorism was another topic Rubio referred to before US lawmakers.

He also attributed the absence of American diplomats in Kabul to security concerns and added that Donald Trump is closely following the situation in Afghanistan.

Rubio said: “The president is keenly aware of the situation there. He was very involved in negotiating in his first presidency for a deal that kept Americans safe and I think he’s interested in arriving at one again to ensure Afghanistan never becomes a launchpad for external, external operations against Americans anywhere in the world, especially the homeland.”

In response to these remarks, the caretaker government of Afghanistan has not yet commented. However, previously the acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi emphasized the need for the US to understand Afghanistan’s current realities and engage with Kabul.

“Confrontation is not a solution; we have seen the confrontation with the US and also with Russia. It is in the interest of both parties to abandon confrontations,” said Gulmuhammaduddin Mohammadi, a political analyst.

Despite the visit of the US delegation to Kabul and the exchange of prisoners between the two sides—which raised optimism about improving relations—no progress has been achieved so far.

Rubio: ‘Taliban’ Status ‘Under Review’ by Trump Administration
read more