Relative of Afghans Who Helped U.S. Military Is Deported to Africa

The Trump administration has deported thousands of immigrants to countries where they have no ties. Dozens were on the latest flight, to the Central African Republic.

A deportation plane carrying about 70 foreign nationals, one of an increasing number of flights that have sent thousands of immigrants to countries where they have no ties, left for the Central African Republic on Friday, according to advocacy organizations.

On board was a 24-year-old Afghan whose father, brother and sister worked alongside U.S. forces, said AfghanEvac, a U.S.-based group that assists Afghan allies, the American Civil Liberties Union and a person familiar with the operation who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Deporting relatives of Afghans who aided the U.S. military during its 20-year campaign in Afghanistan breaks a longstanding American commitment to protect wartime allies. Thousands of Afghans fled with their families after the Taliban overthrew the U.S.-backed government in Kabul five years ago.

Under the Biden administration, many received special visas or asylum. Immigration judges granted others “withholding of removal,” which allows noncitizens not granted asylum to remain in the United States because they would face grave danger if returned to their country.

About 19,000 people have been sent to Mexico even though they have no ties to the country. Overall, 23,000 have been sent to countries they are not originally from, according to Human Rights First and Refugees International, groups that track third-country deportation flights.

Friday’s flight was the third since June to the Central African Republic, a country enduring its own civil war, according to Human Rights First, which tracks deportation flights.

“Sending people who won protection in immigration court to a conflict zone is a callous and deliberate strategy by this administration to force people to abandon their claims and rights,” said Sarah Mehta, deputy director of immigration policy and government affairs at the American Civil Liberties Union.

Khalil, the 24-year-old deported on Friday, was granted withholding of removal last year by an immigration judge who found his fear of persecution credible, according to his lawyer, Alma David.

After Kabul fell in August 2021, the family fled to Pakistan, and the Taliban raided their house in search of them, according to interviews with two brothers who now live in the United States.

Khalil, identified by his first name at the request of his lawyer out of concern for his safety, traveled to the United States in the hopes of joining his brothers in 2024. He was detained after crossing the border and applied for asylum.

Marine Col. Zachary Schmidt, who supervised Khalil’s brother Najib during the U.S. military campaign, testified at Khalil’s asylum hearing. He told the judge that he had seen texts and handwritten letters from the Taliban to Khalil’s brother, threatening the family because of work he performed in support of the U.S. mission.

“I firmly believe that if this young man is forced to return to Afghanistan he will be killed,” he said of Khalil in an interview. “The United States made a commitment to protect the people who helped us, and that includes their families.”

Najib, the brother, said in an interview that he had left Afghanistan in 2014 and applied for a special status granted to Afghans who assisted the United States as well as petitioned for asylum. (He has since obtained a green card.)

“We paid the price of serving the U.S. government; my brother was killed,” he said. “Now the situation with Khalil is very, very unfair. He could get killed immediately” if forced to return to Afghanistan.

The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions about the deportation of relatives of Afghan allies.

In a statement, the department said, “For operational security and the safety of our personnel, we would never disclose information about our deportation flights. We are applying the law as written. If a judge finds an illegal alien has no right to be in this country, we are going to remove them.”

Among those deported Friday were about 20 Afghan nationals, according to advocacy organizations and a person familiar with the operation. Another 10 were Iranians. Others were from Nepal, Nicaragua and other countries.

“Iranians who can’t go back to a war zone and Afghans who fear deportation to the Taliban are going to be essentially under house arrest, in an unstable country,” said Ms. Mehta of the A.C.L.U. “This is not immigration policy; it’s cruelty.”

The first third-country flight departed for South Sudan in July 2025.

“We’ve seen a dramatic escalation in third country deportations to countries in Africa,” said Savi Arvey, director of policy, refugee and immigrant rights at Human Rights First.

Friday’s flight took off from the Dallas area, according to Human Rights First. It was scheduled to make stops in Senegal and Sierra Leone before landing in the Central African capital of Bangui.

The Trump administration has increasingly relied on third-country agreements with impoverished, troubled countries to deport nationals whose countries refuse to accept them, or whom a judge has found would be in peril if repatriated.

Many of the countries, such as the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of The Congo, appear on State Department advisories warning against travel there.

Until then, the deportees are often confined in ramshackle housing, according to advocates, and they receive no legal status, work authorization or legal support.

Relative of Afghans Who Helped U.S. Military Is Deported to Africa
read more

UN Says More Than 100 Health Centers Shut in Afghanistan

The United Nations says funding cuts to humanitarian operations in Afghanistan have forced the closure of more than 100 health centers, leaving millions of children with reduced access to lifesaving nutrition and medical care.

Melissa Fleming, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications, said in a post on X on Saturday that the closures come as Afghanistan faces a worsening child malnutrition crisis. She warned that 3.7 million children across the country are suffering from acute malnutrition, including around one million children with severe, life-threatening forms of the condition.

Fleming said the shutdown of health facilities has made it significantly harder for children with acute malnutrition to receive essential treatment, therapeutic food and other critical nutrition services.

The closures follow months of growing warnings from UN agencies that humanitarian funding for Afghanistan has fallen sharply, forcing aid organizations to scale back health, nutrition and emergency assistance programs across the country.

Millions of Afghans, particularly children, pregnant women and displaced families, remain dependent on humanitarian aid for access to basic healthcare and food assistance after years of conflict, economic collapse and recurring natural disasters.

UN agencies have repeatedly warned that without additional international funding, more health and nutrition services could be suspended, putting vulnerable communities at greater risk of disease, hunger and preventable deaths.

Humanitarian organizations have urged donors to increase funding, saying Afghanistan remains one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises despite declining global financial support.

UN Says More Than 100 Health Centers Shut in Afghanistan
read more

European Parliament to Discuss Return of Afghan Refugees to Afghanistan

The discussion will take place following meetings between the European Commission and representatives of the Islamic Emirate.

The European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights is scheduled to discuss the return of Afghan refugees and asylum seekers from the European Union to Afghanistan on Thursday, September 3.

According to the European Parliament’s official agenda, the discussion will take place following meetings between the European Commission and representatives designated by the Islamic Emirate, and against the backdrop of the human rights situation in Afghanistan.

The European Parliament said its Human Rights Subcommittee will discuss on Thursday the return of refugees and asylum seekers from the EU to Afghanistan, following meetings between the European Commission and Taliban-appointed representatives and amid concerns over the human rights situation in Afghanistan.

Abdul Raziq Adil, a migrant rights activist, said: “Europe’s decisions are driven less by improvements in living and security conditions in Afghanistan than by domestic crises, pressure from conservative parties and growing fatigue in host societies over migration. While Europe seeks to contain the political and economic costs through deportations, such measures directly contradict the fundamental values of the European Union.”

Earlier, on June 23, 2026, an Islamic Emirate delegation met for the first time in Brussels with representatives of the European Commission and 15 EU member states.

The technical-level meeting focused primarily on the return and readmission of Afghan citizens who do not have the right to remain in the European Union. The European Commission and Sweden co-chaired the meeting.

Mohammad Jamal Muslim, a migrant rights activist, said: “Migration has become a global issue. Members of the European Parliament should not merely make statements; they should remain committed to their international obligations to protect human rights and the rights of migrants.”

Mohammad Khan Talebi Mohammadzai, another migrant rights activist, said: “European countries should continue their engagement with Islamic Emirate officials to help provide housing and employment opportunities for deported asylum seekers.”

According to figures published by Eurostat, 14,270 Afghan citizens were ordered to leave EU countries during the first nine months of 2025, while 340 Afghan citizens were returned to Afghanistan.

European Parliament to Discuss Return of Afghan Refugees to Afghanistan
read more

FM: Islamic Emirate Seeks to Normalize Relations With US

Muttaqi also called on the United States to reconsider its position toward the Islamic Emirate in light of Afghanistan’s current circumstances.

Five years after the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, Kabul says it is willing to open a new chapter in relations with Washington.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, Foreign Minister of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, told Japan’s Kyodo News that Kabul is seeking to normalize relations with the United States and that the two sides can engage on the basis of mutual respect and shared interests.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, Foreign Minister of the Islamic Emirate, said: “We are seeking to normalize relations with the United States. The two sides can engage on the basis of mutual respect and shared interests. Recognition is an issue for the next stage.”

Dawood Shiraz, a political analyst, said: “Establishing relations between the United States and Afghanistan is not impossible, because the United States needs us and needs this land. The United States has lost something, and keeping Afghanistan isolated is harmful to them. Establishing these relations also has particular benefits for us.”

Muttaqi also called on the United States to reconsider its position toward the Islamic Emirate in light of Afghanistan’s current circumstances.

In another part of his remarks, the foreign minister described relations between Afghanistan and Japan as historic and close and called for the resumption of operations at the Afghan Embassy in Tokyo.

Aziz Maarij, an international relations analyst, said: “Japan is a manufacturing and industrial country and has good relations with both the Eastern and Western blocs. It has always provided unconditional assistance to Afghanistan and has had no political agenda or intention to interfere in Afghanistan.”

Regarding relations with Moscow, Muttaqi said that the military and technical cooperation agreement with Russia is intended for the repair and maintenance of Russian-made weapons and is not directed against any particular country.

Akhtar Rasekh, a political analyst, said: “The closer we get to Moscow, the more Western intelligence interference, carried out through Pakistan’s intelligence services, will materialize in Afghanistan, once again exposing Afghanistan to proxy wars driven by the agendas of the West and Pakistan’s ISI.”

Russia is so far the only country to have formally recognized the Islamic Emirate, while Kabul is also seeking to expand engagement with the United States, Japan, and other countries.

FM: Islamic Emirate Seeks to Normalize Relations With US
read more

5 years after withdrawal, a grave picture for Afghans inside and outside the US

The fifth anniversary of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan falls as the nation’s citizens face a starkly different picture than when they first arrived in America, with the Trump administration employing numerous tactics to deport Afghans and halt the arrival of new refugees.

Since President Trump returned to office, he has drastically curtailed the pathways for Afghans to arrive in the U.S., even curbing immigration processing for several countries following a fatal attack on National Guardsmen carried out by an Afghan national.

Under the second Trump administration, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has moved to strip temporary protected status (TPS) for Afghans, ending protections that kept more than 8,000 people from being deported. The administration has also begun the process of reviewing and revoking some special immigrant visas (SIVs) given to Afghans who worked alongside the U.S. in military and government efforts as interpreters, special operations partners and local embassy staff.

And the White House as one of its earliest moves also suspended refugee processing except for white South Africans, cutting off hopes of many Afghans of reaching the U.S.

“As we take stock of whether the U.S. has lived up to its obligations and promises to the Afghans who worked and served alongside American military personnel and partners, often at great personal risk, the answer is a resounding no,” Sharif Aly, president of the International Refugee Assistance Project said on a recent call with reporters.

“The Trump administration has closed virtually all pathways for Afghans to receive visas or enter the U.S., even as there are over 5 million Afghans currently displaced all over the world.”

For Afghans and their advocates — a group that includes many veterans who served in the country — things have gone from bad to worse.

Twenty years of U.S. involvement in the county came to an end over two weeks of chaos at Hamid Karzai International Airport, with throngs of people crowded outside in the hopes of being boarded onto a limited number of flights slated to take allies to safety. More than 80,000 were evacuated through Operation Allies Welcome.

Despite the two decades of nation-building, the Taliban now control the country, and women — who had been free to attend school and pursue careers — are now shut off from most aspects of public life.

And Afghans who did make it to the U.S. live in a precarious state. Even those who gained an SIV or who have a green card have received letters warning them the basis for that status has been revoked.

“Five years ago, this was a crisis. Everything was on fire, nobody had a plan, and the failures were failures of capacity. That is not what this is anymore,” Shawn VanDiver, president and founder of #AfghanEvac, told reporters.

“Today it is not a crisis. It is a deliberate choice, grounded in policy this government has not had the courage to verbalize or brief.”

The Trump administration has shut off virtually every possible pathway for Afghans to reach the U.S. while taking a number of steps to enable deportations of those currently here.

Afghanistan is among the countries on Trump’s travel ban, which bars citizens from a number of countries from getting tourist visas. A second expanded travel ban stripped the narrow exceptions that had allowed for processing of Afghan SIVs, effectively ending the program.

Afghanistan was also on the list of 75 countries for which Trump suspended immigration visas, also cutting off routes for those seeking to join family in the U.S. While a judge last weekend vacated the policy, the State Department on Tuesday paused immigrant visa appointments worldwide to carry out “in-depth training” for consular officers, arguing they need to screen out foreign applicants at risk of taking advantage of U.S. public assistance.

And for those within the U.S., their standing is shakier than ever.

Getting an SIV is a lengthy process, one that requires “chief of mission” approval, in which high-ranking State Department officials sign off on an applicant’s proof of employment. But the Trump administration has been reviewing the basis for those SIVs — a process that began under former President Biden, but which NPR found has been escalating under Trump.

For all those with tenuous statuses, TPS was the protection blocking them from being deported. The Trump administration has ended TPS for 13 out of 17 total countries, with the remaining four set to expire shortly.

“People who went through the steps to secure it really felt like it was a backstop for them,” Joseph Azam, board chair of the Afghan-American Foundation, told The Hill.

“And so, with that being gone, I think people feel like they’re walking a tightrope without a net, and that’s really scary.”

Laila Ayub, co-founder of the Afghan Network for Advocacy and Resources, said she and other immigration attorneys donating their time frequently have to deliver bad news.

“We find ourselves facing difficult conversations every day, explaining to our clients and our friends and family that there is little that we can do as attorneys,” she said on a call with reporters.

“There’s little that we can do when they’re facing, for example, delays with their green cards or asylum, and even less that we can do to help them reunite with their families without action from Congress and others,” she added.

“Every time that there’s a bit of good news — which we’re so grateful for the lawyers who are challenging many of these policies — we end up having a conversation where people in our community think this means that there’s now a pathway back open for their family to come here, and the reality is that that’s still not the case.”

VanDiver this week highlighted the case of one man, a 24-year-old known in court documents as K.Y., applying for asylum where an immigration judge granted them a withholding of removal to Afghanistan, determining he would be likely to face persecution there.

While in the past, such a determination meant someone would not be deported, the Trump administration has taken to removing migrants to third countries. This man is now facing removal to the Central African Republic, where the State Department warns that armed groups control much of the country and conflict breaks out regularly.

Inside Afghanistan, Azam said, people are losing hope, both of fleeing to the U.S. or adjusting to the new reality of life under the Taliban.

It’s been particularly hard for women.

“The people who I hear from that are most distressed and most kind of lacking in hope are still Afghan women,” Azam said, “especially when you know a lot of the public narrative in support of them is waning.”

He called it “a generational setback” as “the path Afghanistan’s on because of this policy is very different than what it was on five years ago where half its population now is erased from public life, erased from education, erased from certain careers, and also erased from the political discourse.”

There are also still many Afghans stuck in limbo across the globe — those who were able to flee to the country but unable to reach the U.S.

Some were ferried out on official flights or other privately arranged charters, while others escaped on their own.

“There are still about 260,000 Afghans stuck in roughly 90 countries — Afghanistan, Pakistan, Qatar and so many more, waiting on a promise the United States made to them,” VanDiver said.

“And many Afghans who did make it here, including the ones our own government put on planes and flew to this country, are being harassed by ICE,” VanDiver continued, referring to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). “That’s the story. Both halves of it. Stuck out there and hunted in here.”

Numerous legislative efforts to aid Afghans in the U.S. and abroad have stalled over the years, including a sweeping effort — the Afghan Adjustment Act — that would provide a pathway to citizenship for all Afghans who arrived under the Biden administration, triggering a fresh round of vetting. It would also smooth processing of Afghans who would qualify as refugees.

Under the Trump administration, the legislative vehicles have narrowed, focusing instead on seeking to protect TPS for Afghans, as well as shore up the SIV program.

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), a veteran who served in Afghanistan, is one of the co-sponsors of a bill that would protect TPS for Afghans through 2029.

“We had a good inflow of refugees from Afghanistan, and then this current administration pretty much shut it off. I think it’s wrong. We have a moral obligation to those we served with in Afghanistan, who served by our side, helping us out. We had a promise, and a promise made should be promises kept, absolutely,” Bacon said on a call with reporters.

He said he believed the bill could advance under a discharge petition to force a vote given that there is some GOP support, but he said that TPS should be a “fallback plan” until Congress could gain support for a bill to give that same population a pathway to citizenship.

“I think that the appropriate, the humanitarian, the merciful, the right policy is to find a pathway towards permanent status and citizenship down the road for people in this category — particularly Afghan TPS — is what we should be trying to do,” he said.

But action to do so seems further away than ever.

“All the work we did, like sleeping on the Capitol steps, all this energy and momentum, and all these different ways we tried to crack this nut for almost five years,” Azam said, “it wasn’t enough then, and it’s really not enough now.”

5 years after withdrawal, a grave picture for Afghans inside and outside the US
read more

Trump administration deports relative of Afghans who helped US military to Central African Republic

DAKAR, Senegal — The United States on Saturday deported dozens of people to the Central African Republic, including an Afghan whose brothers collaborated with the U.S. military, his lawyer and an advocacy group said.

The Afghan man, who is in his early twenties, was granted protection against deportation to Afghanistan by a U.S. judge due to fears of persecution by the Taliban, his lawyer Alma David said.

His family in Afghanistan had received threats from the Taliban because of the work performed by the brothers in support of the U.S. military, according to court documents seen by The Associated Press.

Another one of his brothers was a pilot trained by the U.S. and was killed by the Taliban, she added.

The deportation flight which landed in Central African Republic’s capital Bangui on Saturday, included 12 Afghans and eight Iranians, as well as several people from Nepal and Nicaragua, said Savi Arvey, director of policy, refugee and immigrant rights at Human Rights First.

Under a series of often secret agreements, the Trump administration has deported thousands of people to two dozen countries that aren’t their own as it pushes ahead with its immigration crackdown, advocates say. Immigration lawyers say the practice is being used as a legal loophole to indirectly return some asylum seekers to countries they fled. The flight on Saturday is the second to the Central African Republic since June, which carried two dozen migrants, including an Iranian woman facing persecution in her home country.

Trump administration deports relative of Afghans who helped US military to Central African Republic
read more

ICE deports Afghans and others to Africa, expanding “third country” deportations

Over a 10-day period, the Trump administration sent more than 100 deportees from Afghanistan, Cuba, Nicaragua and other nations to eight countries across Africa, expanding its “third country” deportation campaign, according to internal U.S. government documents obtained by CBS News.

Three Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportation flights, the government documents show, dropped off dozens of men and women expelled from the U.S. in Burundi, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Liberia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone.

None of the deportees were from the countries where they were deported, according to the documents. In addition to Afghans, Cubans and Nicaraguans, the ICE flights over the past week and a half included deportees from Iran, Nepal, Turkey and Venezuela, as well as African detainees who are not from the nations where they were sent.

The federal documents, which have not been previously reported on, offer a window into the Trump administration’s intensifying campaign to use “third country” deportation agreements to banish groups of deportees to far-flung countries where they have no ties.

More than 30 countries across the globe have agreed to receive such deportations from the U.S., including some in Latin America like Costa Rica, Panama and Paraguay. But a growing number of African countries have brokered third-country deportation deals with the Trump administration, including nations like the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan, plagued by armed conflict, political tumult and human rights abuses.

The international agreements have largely been shrouded in secrecy, but it appears some countries, like Ghana and Sierra Leone, have only agreed to accept deportees from other places in Africa. Countries like Eswatini, the Central African Republic and Liberia have received detainees from Latin America, Europe and Asia.

Some of those deported to Africa by the Trump administration have criminal records in addition to immigration violations, including the detainees sent to Eswatini and South Sudan, where officials have imprisoned deportees convicted of violent and serious crimes in the U.S. But many of the deportees sent to other countries lack any criminal histories, beyond entering the U.S. illegally or not having the proper documents to stay in the country.

The latest of three ICE flights to Africa dropped off detainees in Sierra Leone and the Central African Republic, where longstanding armed conflict and Russian mercenaries have made the landlocked country one of the most dangerous in the world. A “Level 4” U.S. State Department advisory warns Americans to avoid traveling there for any reason, given widespread violence and insecurity.

CBS News reached out to the Departments of Homeland Security and State seeking comment on the deportations to Africa.

“If an illegal alien chooses to file a claim in court refusing to go to their home country, we are required by law to find a safe and secure nation for them to go to. If an illegal alien chooses to go home, we will give them a free flight home and a $3,000 check,” DHS said in a statement to CBS News on Sunday. “The choice is theirs.”

A State Department spokesperson said the agency would not comment on “private diplomatic communications with other governments” or the “authenticity or veracity of allegedly leaked documents.”

“Implementing the Trump Administration’s immigration policies is a top priority for the Department of State,” the State Department spokesperson added. “We remain unwavering in our commitment to end illegal and mass immigration and bolster America’s border security.”

Among those deported to the Central African Republic on the most recent flight was an Afghan man whose family helped American forces fight the Taliban and who won legal protection in a U.S. immigration court, according to his lawyer and brother.

Khalil, the 24-year-old Afghan deportee, crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally in 2024, after traveling across Latin America, according to his immigration lawyer. He was held by ICE in custody during his entire time in the U.S. His immigration lawyer said Khalil came to join his brothers, one of whom was brought to the U.S. in 2014 because of his work alongside American military forces while in the Afghan Army. Legal documents indicate another of Khalil’s brothers fought the Taliban as a pilot and was killed during the war.

In August 2025, while detained, Khalil was granted a legal protection, known as “withholding of removal,” by a U.S. immigration judge who found he could face persecution in Afghanistan, legal documents show. He did not get asylum, a more permanent legal protection, because of a Biden-era policy that disqualified asylum-seekers who failed to seek protection in other countries before reaching American soil, according to the documents.

While that protection barred ICE from returning Khalil to Afghanistan, it did not legally prevent his deportation to a third country. And the Trump administration has increasingly sought to deport those who’ve won limited protections in immigration court, like withholding of removal, to third countries.

“The goal is to obliterate the global refugee protection system, and his case should serve as a warning of the unconscionable consequences,” said Alma David, Khalil’s immigration lawyer. CBS News is not disclosing Khalil’s surname due to concerns from his family that he or relatives could be targeted by the Taliban.

Zachary Schmidt, an active-duty Marine colonel who supervised Khalil’s brother during his deployment to Afghanistan, said he’s concerned about Khalil’s safety in the conflict-ridden Central African Republic and the prospect that he could be returned to his homeland. He said he’s seen threats made by Taliban militants against Khalil’s family.

“It is my belief that if Khalil gets sent back to Afghanistan, that he will be killed,”  Schmidt told CBS News, speaking in his personal capacity.

Schmidt, who testified in Khalil’s immigration court case, noted the U.S. made a “deal” with Afghans who agreed to aid the American war effort in Afghanistan.

“The deal is that if you help us, and help rebuild your country, we will look out for you. We’ll help you and your family,” Schmidt said. “We have to keep that promise.”

ICE deports Afghans and others to Africa, expanding “third country” deportations
read more

Mirziyoyev: We Will Continue Constructive Approach Toward Afghanistan

Previously, at the first Central Asia–Japan summit, Mirziyoyev also said that Afghanistan remains an important area of engagement.

Uzbekistan’s president has reiterated his country’s commitment to a constructive approach toward Afghanistan.

Shavkat Mirziyoyev, speaking at a ceremony marking the 35th anniversary of Uzbekistan’s independence, said economic diplomacy is one of the priorities of Uzbekistan’s foreign policy and that the country will continue to expand it.

Shavkat Mirziyoyev, President of Uzbekistan, said: “For the first time, our country will chair the Non-Aligned Movement from 2027 to 2029. We will actively advance initiatives aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of this global platform, which brings together more than 120 countries. We will continue our constructive policy toward Afghanistan, our neighboring country.”

Previously, at the first Central Asia–Japan summit, Mirziyoyev also said that Afghanistan remains an important area of engagement.

Mirziyoyev expressed hope that Afghanistan would move toward peace and stability and focus on meaningful development.

Mohammad Aslam Danishmal, a university lecturer, said: “Economically, Afghanistan is a good market for Uzbek products, and its geographic location is also important for Uzbekistan. Therefore, Tashkent is seeking to expand relations with Kabul, which benefits both sides.”

Uzbekistan is among the countries that maintain close ties and good relations with the Islamic Emirate and Afghanistan.

However, Uzbekistan has not yet formally recognized the Islamic Emirate.

Mirziyoyev: We Will Continue Constructive Approach Toward Afghanistan
read more

Mujahid: We Want Wartime Policies to Change and Good Relations With US

In another part of the interview, Mujahid said the Islamic Emirate does not want war in the region.

Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, has told an Indian media outlet that the current government wants wartime policies to change and seeks good relations with the United States.

Mujahid added that the Islamic Emirate wants the US Embassy in Kabul and the Afghan Embassy in Washington to resume operations, and diplomatic relations between the two countries to be normalized.

Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, said: “Afghanistan wants good relations, and we want wartime policies to change. We want the US Embassy to resume operations in Afghanistan, our embassy in Washington to resume its activities, and normal diplomatic relations between the two countries to be restored.”

In another part of the interview, Mujahid said the Islamic Emirate does not want war in the region and will not support one country against another, including Pakistan.

Mujahid said agreements among Islamic countries are not a cause for concern, adding that such agreements are based on countries’ interests and benefit the Islamic world.

Zabihullah Mujahid added: “This does not cause us concern because these countries make agreements based on their own interests. Saudi Arabia’s security is important. Türkiye and Pakistan are also important Islamic countries. If they reach an agreement on an issue, we view it as cooperation among Islamic countries, and overall, it benefits the Islamic world. This does not threaten us because we have no hostility toward any of these countries. As I said earlier, the recent aggression was initiated by Pakistan, but we consider it a local issue. We want this matter to be resolved. None of these countries is our enemy.”

Wahid Faqiri, an international relations analyst, said: “Every government needs to have better relations with neighboring countries as well as other countries. This is the strength of diplomacy. However, disagreements sometimes arise, and countries must also manage those differences.”

Regarding the recognition of the Islamic Emirate, Mujahid said the decision depends on the conditions and interests of each country, adding that Kabul has formal relations with a number of countries in the region.

Mujahid: We Want Wartime Policies to Change and Good Relations With US
read more

US Remained In Afghanistan Rather Than Defeating Terrorism, Says Russian FM

29 August 2026

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has accused the United States of choosing to maintain a military presence in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks rather than focusing on eliminating terrorism.

Speaking to Russia’s RBC television network on Friday, 28 August, Lavrov discussed tensions between Moscow and the West, the latest developments in the war in Ukraine, and the US role in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

According to the Russian foreign minister, after the 11 September attacks the UN Security Council adopted a resolution supporting US military operations in Afghanistan, aimed at combating terrorism and helping Afghans return to normal life.

Referring to the attacks, Lavrov said Russia had sincerely expressed sympathy with the United States. He said President Vladimir Putin was the first foreign leader to contact the US president at the time on 11 September 2001 and offer assistance.

Lavrov said Russia had been prepared to cooperate with the international coalition in combating terrorism in Afghanistan. He added, however, that instead of eliminating the threat, the United States chose to remain in Afghanistan for years.

On 11 September 2001, al-Qaeda carried out attacks on the World Trade Center towers in New York, the Pentagon in Virginia and a field in Pennsylvania.

Nearly 3,000 people, including civilians, firefighters and police officers, were killed in the attacks.

Following the attacks, the United States invaded Afghanistan, where the Taliban regime had provided sanctuary to al-Qaeda leaders, and overthrew the Taliban government.

 

US Remained In Afghanistan Rather Than Defeating Terrorism, Says Russian FM
read more