Spate Of Attacks In Northern Afghanistan Pose Test For Taliban

During the 1990s, Afghanistan’s vast and mountainous province of Badakhshan was a bastion of resistance to the rule of the Taliban.

Now, the resource-rich region is again becoming a thorn on the side of the Islamist militant group, which regained power in the war-torn country almost five years ago.

Bordering Tajikistan, China, and Pakistan, Badakhshan has witnessed a spate of attacks in recent weeks. Experts say anti-Taliban armed groups are feeding off ethnic tensions, disputes over control of resources, and local grievances against the Taliban.

“The attacks could develop into a serious and persistent problem in Badakhshan, but they do not yet threaten Taliban rule nationally or point to the imminent loss of the province,” said Ted Callahan, a former adviser to the US military in Badakhshan.

‘Checkpoints Everywhere’

In the latest attack to hit the province, a local Taliban official was gunned down on July 28. Zabihullah Amiri, head of the provincial information and culture department, was killed by two men on motorbikes on a major road in Badakhshan, the Taliban said.

Zabihullah Amiri
Zabihullah Amiri

The attack was claimed by the Islamic State-Khorasan (IS-K) extremist group, which has posed the biggest threat to Taliban rule since 2021.

On July 17, a new opposition group, Sipahiyan-e Mihan (Soldiers of the Homeland Front) briefly seized control of the Yaftal-e Payeen district in Badakhshan. The group is believed to be led by Qayum Malang, an officer in the former Afghan Army.

Two other opposition groups, the National Resistance Front (NRF) and the Afghanistan Freedom Front (AFF), have also claimed attacks in the province’s districts of Yaftal-e Payeen, Zebak, and Darayem in recent months.

In response, the Taliban has imposed new security measures and made arrests, locals said.

“Since the recent events here, severe restrictions have been imposed on the people,” a resident of Yaftal-e Payeen, who spoke on condition of anonymity for security reasons, told RFE/RL’s Radio Azadi.

“Here in Yaftal, a large number of Pashto-speaking brothers have also arrived, and they have transferred several longtime local [Taliban] to other areas.”

A mostly Pashtun militant group dominated by clerics, the Taliban seized power in Kabul in August 2021 after previously ruling most of Afghanistan from 1996 until December 2001, when its regime collapsed following the US-led invasion. Since returning to power, it has monopolized authority and sidelined many of the country’s ethnic and religious groups as well as political factions.

Badakhshan is made up predominately of ethnic Tajiks. Many Taliban commanders in Badakhshan are ethnic Tajiks, although that appears to be changing.

“There are checkpoints and searches everywhere,” said the resident of Yaftal-e Payeen district. “The Taliban inspect people’s phones. There are night patrols. They come and search people’s homes without giving a reason.”

Disputes Over Resources

Badakhshan is rich in natural resources, including gold, silver, and semiprecious stones.

The extraction of those minerals has intensified in recent years, and the Taliban’s cash-strapped and unrecognized government has sought to centralize control over mining revenues. The move has fueled local resentment and infighting among Taliban commanders.

The Taliban’s decision in 2022 to ban the production of opium — a lifeline for impoverished farmers in much of the country — has also triggered anger.

Taliban Enforces ‘Proper Hijab’ With Detentions And Beatings Of Women

In 2024, protests broke out in Badakhshan over the Taliban’s forceful enforcement of its ban on illicit drugs. The hard-line group violently clamped down on the rallies, shooting and killing several protesters and rounding up dozens of locals.

Since returning to power, the Taliban has also increasingly marginalized Afghanistan’s Shi’ite religious minority, which makes up around 15 percent of the population. Badakhshan is home to a sizeable Ismaili Shi’a community.

“Poppy eradication campaigns, disputes over control of gold and lapis lazuli mines, restrictions over Ismaili communities and the Taliban’s own differences — Pashtun versus Tajik — have created deep resentment among people and the opposition groups have cashed the opportunity,” said Callahan.

‘Continuing Insurgency’

Several small armed groups have waged a low-level insurgency against the Taliban, carrying out sporadic hit-and-run attacks and the assassination of Taliban officials.

Experts say the groups have not yet shown that they can recruit on a large scale, maintain dependable supply lines, unify their various fronts, or govern territory after capturing it. The Taliban, experts say, has advantages in personnel, transport, intelligence, and heavy weapons.

“The likeliest outcome is therefore a contained but continuing insurgency,” said Callahan.

Sami Yousafzai, a London-based Afghan analyst, said the “anti-Taliban groups don’t have the power to seize and hold areas.” But he said the spike in attacks in Badakhshan have succeeded in denting the Taliban’s “image of invincibility.”

Daud Khattak is a senior international correspondent covering the Near East in RFE/RL’s Central Newsroom. He was previously the managing editor of RFE/RL’s Radio Mashaal.

Mustafa Sarwar is a senior news editor for RFE/RL’s Radio Azadi, one of the most popular and trusted media outlets in Afghanistan. Nearly half of the country’s adult audience accesses Azadi’s reporting on a weekly basis.

Spate Of Attacks In Northern Afghanistan Pose Test For Taliban
read more

Amnesty Urges EU to Halt Forced Returns and Deportations to Afghanistan

Khaama Press

Amnesty International has urged the European Union and its member states to halt efforts to forcibly return Afghan nationals to Afghanistan, warning that the country cannot currently be considered safe for forced returns.

In an open letter to EU Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration Magnus Brunner and interior ministers of EU member states, Amnesty said cooperation with Taliban authorities on the readmission of Afghans could conflict with European governments’ obligations under international refugee and human rights law, particularly the principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits returning people to places where they face a real risk of serious harm.

Amnesty said it was particularly concerned about efforts by EU governments to establish technical arrangements with the Taliban for returning Afghans, including people with criminal convictions or those considered security risks.

The organisation said Afghanistan was not considered a safe destination for forced returns even before the Taliban seized power in 2021 and that conditions have since deteriorated. It cited restrictions on fundamental rights, arbitrary detention, torture and mistreatment, limits on freedom of expression and serious restrictions affecting women, girls and ethnic and religious minorities.

The rights group also pointed to Afghanistan’s continuing humanitarian crisis, including poverty, drought, natural disasters and reduced humanitarian assistance. It said Afghans returning from Iran and Pakistan can face severe difficulties finding shelter, employment, healthcare and other basic services, increasing the risks associated with forced returns.

Amnesty’s intervention follows a June 23 visit by a Taliban delegation to Brussels for discussions with European Commission officials on the return and readmission of Afghan nationals. The talks took place amid pressure from some EU governments to increase the number of rejected asylum seekers being returned.

The organisation warned that establishing formal readmission cooperation initially focused on people convicted of crimes or considered security threats could eventually create mechanisms for the return of other Afghans whose protection claims remain unresolved.

Amnesty called on EU governments to stop efforts to restart forced deportations and readmission cooperation with the Taliban and to ensure that every protection decision takes into account Afghanistan’s current human rights, security and humanitarian conditions.

It also urged European governments to ensure that engagement with the Taliban remains focused on protecting human rights and people at risk rather than facilitating deportations.

The debate comes as European governments face domestic pressure to increase the number of rejected asylum seekers returned to their countries of origin. Amnesty said such political pressure must not override states’ legal obligations to prevent the return of people who could face persecution or serious harm in Afghanistan.

Amnesty Urges EU to Halt Forced Returns and Deportations to Afghanistan
read more

Pakistan To Extend Stay for 16,000 Afghan Women, Children and Elderly on Humanitarian Grounds

Pakistan will extend the stay of about 16,000 Afghan women, children and elderly people on humanitarian grounds, while authorities continue reviewing the status of tens of thousands of other Afghans whose legal residency documents are not currently valid.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said the extension was approved to address humanitarian concerns and protect vulnerable groups. Pakistani officials have previously said that more than 16,000 Afghans had been identified for temporary exemption from repatriation following screening and due diligence.

At the same time, authorities are reviewing the cases of about 89,000 Afghan nationals who do not currently have valid legal residency documents. Andrabi said decisions on their cases would be taken after the relevant procedures are completed.

The decision comes as Pakistan continues its campaign to return Afghan nationals who lack valid legal status. Islamabad has said foreign nationals without valid travel or residency documents remain liable for repatriation, while stressing that humanitarian considerations can be taken into account in vulnerable cases.

The policy has drawn concern from humanitarian organisations, particularly over its impact on access to healthcare. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has reported that the threat of arrest and deportation has created a climate of fear among Afghan refugees in Pakistan, with some delaying or skipping medical appointments because they fear being detained.

MSF has called on Pakistan to ensure that Afghan refugees can travel safely to healthcare facilities and receive treatment without facing arrest or deportation. The organisation has warned that the pressure surrounding the repatriation campaign is worsening the humanitarian and health conditions of vulnerable Afghan families.

Pakistan’s latest decision provides temporary relief to a sizeable group of vulnerable Afghans, but it does not represent an end to the wider repatriation campaign. The future of tens of thousands of other Afghan nationals remains uncertain as their cases continue to be reviewed.

The issue has become a major humanitarian and diplomatic concern, with Pakistan balancing its immigration and security policies against calls from humanitarian organisations to protect vulnerable Afghans and ensure access to essential services.

Pakistan To Extend Stay for 16,000 Afghan Women, Children and Elderly on Humanitarian Grounds
read more

UNAMA Calls for Reopening Girls’ Schools and Universities in Afghanistan

The United Nations has again called on the authorities to reopen secondary schools and universities to girls and ensure women and girls in Afghanistan can access education at all levels without restrictions.

Georgette Gagnon, the acting head of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), made the call during a recent visit to Istalif, north of Kabul, where she visited a girls’ primary school equipped with computers through a UN Development Programme-supported initiative.

Gagnon highlighted the importance of girls having access to information and communications technology and urged the Taliban authorities to remove restrictions preventing girls from continuing their education beyond primary school.

Afghanistan remains the only country in the world where secondary and higher education is formally prohibited for girls and women. UNESCO and UNICEF said in January that about 2.2 million adolescent girls were excluded from secondary school as a result of the restrictions.

The wider education crisis is even larger. In a June 2026 briefing to the UN Security Council, Gagnon said an estimated 3.8 million girls aged 7 to 18 were out of school, including more than 2.6 million adolescent girls. She said about 250,000 additional girls are permanently excluded from secondary education each year.

The prolonged restrictions have consequences beyond access to classrooms. UNESCO and UNICEF have warned that excluding girls from education is weakening Afghanistan’s future workforce and contributing to shortages in professions and essential public services.

UNESCO has also warned that Afghanistan’s education crisis extends beyond the ban on girls’ secondary schooling. More than 2.13 million primary-school-age children were out of school in 2024, while learning outcomes remain extremely weak, with more than 90% of 10-year-olds unable to read a simple text, according to its 2025 education report.

The UN has repeatedly urged the Taliban authorities to lift restrictions on women and girls, arguing that education is a fundamental right and essential to Afghanistan’s social and economic development. Gagnon has also warned that the continued exclusion of women and girls carries long-term generational consequences for the country.

The latest appeal comes as international officials continue to warn that prolonged restrictions risk leaving Afghanistan without a generation of women equipped to enter skilled professions, weakening the country’s education, healthcare and wider economy.

UNAMA Calls for Reopening Girls’ Schools and Universities in Afghanistan
read more

US uses dormant court to seek deportation of Afghan woman accused of aiding terror plot

By  ERIC TUCKER and MICHAEL KUNZELMAN
Associated Press
July 29, 2026

WASHINGTON (AP) — An Afghan woman accused of supporting an Islamic State-inspired plot in the U.S. is the first person facing deportation through the Trump administration’s use of an obscure court that remained dormant for 30 years, according to court records filed Wednesday.

The Alien Terrorist Removal Court is scheduled to hold a hearing on Thursday in Washington, D.C., for the government’s petition to deport Nazira Haji Zada, of Fort Worth, Texas. Nazira was arrested earlier this week.

An FBI memo dated July 15 said it “developed information” that Nazira is an Islamic State supporter who had her children pledge their loyalty to the terrorist group. Nazira “supported” a plot by relatives to carry out an ISIS-inspired attack in the U.S., the memo says.

Court filings identify Nazira as the mother and mother-in-law of two Afghan men who were convicted in Oklahoma for their roles in the 2024 Election Day plot. Her son, Abdullah Haji Zada, was sentenced last November to 15 years in prison and court records show he previously agreed to be removed from the U.S. after he is released from prison.

Her son-in-law, Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, previously worked as a security guard for an American military installation in Afghanistan. He pleaded guilty to conspiring and attempting to provide material support to the Islamic State group, and prosecutors have said he took steps to advance his attack plans by ordering AK-47 rifles, liquidating his family’s assets and buying one-way tickets for his wife and child to travel home to Afghanistan.

The Alien Terrorist Removal Court was established in 1996 but had never received a petition until this month, when the Justice Department filed an application seeking Nazira’s removal. Documents in support of that application were unsealed Wednesday night ahead of a scheduled hearing Thursday.

The long-dormant court has a specific authority to conduct deportation proceedings for individuals whom the Justice Department classifies as “alien terrorists.”

The court is comprised of five federal judges from different districts across the country who are appointed by the chief justice of the Supreme Court, with all proceedings, at least for now, taking place at the federal courthouse in Washington.

“Congress created the Alien Terrorist Removal Court three decades ago to remove from the United States alien terrorists who never should have been here in the first place,” acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement.

“The allegations in this case show the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family aiding in a plot to launch a mass casualty attack on American voters on Election Day. The Department’s application in this court makes clear that terrorists have no place in the United States of America,” Blanche added.

 

US uses dormant court to seek deportation of Afghan woman accused of aiding terror plot
read more

ISKP Claims Killing of Information Chief in Afghanistan’s Badakhshan

Khaama Press

The Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) has claimed responsibility for the killing of Zabihullah Amiri, the Taliban-appointed director of information and culture in northeastern Badakhshan province.

According to Agence France-Presse, the monitoring group SITE reported that Islamic State Khorasan (ISKP) said in a statement on Wednesday that its members targeted Amiri on Tuesday while he was travelling toward Faizabad, the capital of Badakhshan, killing him and one of his guards.

Amiri was killed on Tuesday while travelling on the road between Faizabad and Baharak, according to Afghanistan’s Information Ministry and provincial police. Two armed attackers on a motorcycle opened fire on his vehicle. Amiri’s guards returned fire, killing one attacker and capturing the other, according to authorities.

Amiri was a senior provincial official responsible for information and cultural affairs in Badakhshan, a strategically located province bordering Tajikistan, China and Pakistan. He had previously spoken publicly about government activities and cultural sites in the province.

The killing is significant because targeted attacks on senior Taliban officials have become relatively rare since the group seized power in 2021. The attack nonetheless highlights the continuing threat posed by ISKP, which has remained active despite Taliban operations aimed at dismantling the group.

Badakhshan has previously been the scene of high-profile attacks attributed to ISKP. In June 2023, the group claimed responsibility for a car bombing in Faizabad that killed the province’s deputy governor, Nisar Ahmad Ahmadi, and his driver, as well as a later suicide bombing at a memorial service that killed at least 13 people.

The Taliban has repeatedly said it has improved security across Afghanistan and weakened militant groups. ISKP, however, continues to pose a security challenge through targeted attacks and bombings, particularly against Taliban officials and other high-profile figures.

The killing of Amiri could put additional pressure on Taliban authorities to demonstrate that they can protect senior officials and maintain security in remote provinces. It also underscores the continuing rivalry between the Taliban and ISKP, which oppose each other ideologically and have repeatedly fought for influence in Afghanistan.

For now, authorities have not provided details on the identity or motive of the surviving attacker, and the circumstances surrounding the attack remain under investigation.

ISKP Claims Killing of Information Chief in Afghanistan’s Badakhshan
read more

UNODC, IOM Warn of Rising Human Trafficking Risks in Afghanistan

Khaama Press

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) have warned that Afghans returning from Iran and Pakistan face increased risks of human trafficking, forced labour and other forms of exploitation.

In a joint statement marking World Day Against Trafficking in Persons on Thursday, July 30, the two agencies said many returnees are arriving in communities already struggling with poverty, limited access to basic services and severe economic pressures, increasing their vulnerability to exploitation.

The agencies identified women, children, internally displaced people and returnees among those particularly vulnerable to trafficking and abuse.

UNODC and IOM called for stronger, coordinated measures to prevent trafficking and protect victims, including better identification of people at risk, improved access to protection and assistance, and greater cooperation among law-enforcement and justice institutions.

They also urged authorities and humanitarian partners to raise public awareness about trafficking risks, particularly among communities facing severe economic and social pressures.

The warning comes as Afghanistan continues to receive large numbers of people returning from neighbouring countries. The scale of returns has placed additional pressure on communities already facing a prolonged humanitarian and economic crisis, leaving some families with limited income, housing and access to essential services.

The UN agencies said addressing the underlying causes of trafficking is essential to reducing vulnerability. They called for expanded livelihood opportunities, better access to education and stronger basic services to help prevent people from falling into exploitative situations.

For many returnees, the risk can increase during and immediately after displacement, when families may lack stable housing, income or social support. Children and women can face additional risks when families are separated or forced to rely on informal work and assistance networks.

UNODC and IOM stressed that preventing trafficking cannot be addressed by Afghanistan alone. They called for cooperation among Afghanistan institutions, neighbouring countries and international organisations to identify vulnerable people during cross-border movements, prevent exploitation and ensure that victims receive appropriate support.

The agencies also urged that returning Afghans have access to accurate information, basic services and protection mechanisms as they seek to rebuild their lives.

The warning highlights the broader humanitarian challenge facing Afghanistan, where poverty, displacement and limited economic opportunities can leave vulnerable people exposed to criminal networks and abusive forms of employment.

UNODC and IOM said sustained prevention, victim protection and regional cooperation are essential to ensuring that Afghans returning from abroad do not become further victims of exploitation.

UNODC, IOM Warn of Rising Human Trafficking Risks in Afghanistan
read more

US Judge Rules Travel Ban Cannot Block Afghan Refugees’ Family Reunification

Khaama Press

A US federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration unlawfully applied its Afghan travel restrictions to the spouses and children of seven Afghan nationals who were granted asylum in the United States, a decision that could allow the affected families to move forward with reunification.

US District Judge Anthony J. Trenga of the Eastern District of Virginia ruled in a case brought by seven Afghan families whose asylum status in the United States had been approved and whose spouses or children had also received approval through the I-730 follow-to-join process. Court records show that all of the relevant I-730 petitions had been approved by US Citizenship and Immigration Services before the State Department applied the travel restrictions to the family members.

The case challenges the application of Presidential Proclamations 10949 and 10998, which restrict the entry of Afghan nationals into the United States. Both proclamations contain language stating that they do not apply to people granted asylum and do not limit an individual’s ability to seek asylum.

Judge Trenga previously rejected the government’s attempt to dismiss the lawsuit. In a May 2026 ruling, he found that the State Department’s blanket application of the proclamations to the Afghan families was subject to judicial review and that the derivative family members were clearly seeking asylum.

The court said the State Department had effectively adopted a categorical policy rather than making individualized decisions in the families’ cases. The judge also found that the plaintiffs had plausibly established procedural due-process claims related to the legally established follow-to-join asylum process.

Under the I-730 process, people granted asylum in the United States may petition for their spouses and unmarried children under 21 to join them. In this case, the approved petitions had been transferred for consular processing, but some relatives were denied or delayed at the final stage after the government invoked the travel restrictions.

The ruling is significant because it addresses a specific category of Afghan families whose reunification cases had already progressed through the US immigration system. It does not overturn the broader travel restrictions on Afghan nationals. Proclamation 10998, which took effect in January 2026, continued the suspension of entry for Afghan nationals and removed some categorical exceptions that had existed under the earlier proclamation.

The case also highlights the tension between the Trump administration’s national-security-based entry restrictions and protections contained in US asylum and immigration law. The administration has defended the restrictions as necessary for national security, while the Afghan families argued that applying them categorically to approved derivative-asylum cases undermined the family-reunification process.

For the affected families, the decision could provide a route toward completing cases that had been stalled after years of separation. The court’s reasoning may also influence how US agencies handle other Afghan follow-to-join cases affected by the travel restrictions.

The broader impact, however, will depend on how the State Department implements the ruling and whether the government appeals or seeks further legal review. The case therefore remains important for Afghan families separated by US immigration restrictions, even though the decision is limited to the claims and circumstances before the court.

US Judge Rules Travel Ban Cannot Block Afghan Refugees’ Family Reunification
read more

880 Afghans Return After Release From Pakistani Prisons

Turkish authorities said that seven children were among those detained and that all of them are Afghan nationals.

As the detention and return of Afghan migrants from various countries continues, the Islamic Emirate’s Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation says that 880 Afghan citizens have returned to the country via the provinces of Nangarhar and Kandahar after being released from prisons in Pakistan.

According to a statement from the ministry, the returnees include families, children, and single individuals who had been detained in Pakistan for various reasons.

Pekar, an Afghan migrant in Pakistan, said: “In recent days, we have witnessed the worst situation for Afghan migrants. Unfortunately, police in different provinces of Pakistan raided migrants’ homes. Although their behavior was somewhat more humane than that of the police in Punjab and Islamabad, they still refused to accept any excuse or document other than a valid visa.”

Meanwhile, the Turkish Coast Guard announced the detention of 32 undocumented migrants in the Ezine district of Çanakkale province.

Turkish authorities said that seven children were among those detained and that all of them are Afghan nationals.

Migrant rights activists say that the continued detention and deportation of Afghan citizens by host countries has heightened serious humanitarian concerns and requires greater attention and support from international organizations.

Abdul Raziq Adil, a migrant rights activist, said: “The repeated arrests in Turkey and the continued mass deportations from Pakistan and Iran show that security-driven approaches have replaced humanitarian solutions.”

Abdul Zohour Modaber, an economic analyst, said: “There is a need to create employment opportunities and build the capacities of returnees. Immediate assistance should also be provided for their livelihoods, including food, clothing, and shelter.”

The return of Afghan migrants from Pakistan, Iran, and several other countries has increased in recent months, while international organizations have repeatedly stressed the importance of ensuring that returns are voluntary, safe, and dignified.

880 Afghans Return After Release From Pakistani Prisons
read more

Iran Offers to Mediate Between Afghanistan and Pakistan Amid Tensions

In another part of his remarks, the Iranian diplomat also addressed relations between Kabul and Tehran.

Iran’s deputy ambassador in Kabul has expressed concern over the recent tensions between Kabul and Islamabad, warning against any further escalation.

Seyed Hassan Mortazavi said Iran has been trying to play a mediating role since the beginning of the tensions and has sought to facilitate dialogue between the two sides to reduce their differences.

“Our leadership raised this issue in its first message and stated that we are ready to mediate between the two countries. We are concerned about the conflict between our neighboring and friendly country, Pakistan, and our friendly country, Afghanistan,” said Seyed Hassan Mortazavi, Iran’s deputy ambassador in Kabul.

In another part of his remarks, the Iranian diplomat also addressed relations between Kabul and Tehran.

Mortazavi stressed that Tehran supports good relations with Afghanistan and does not interfere in the country’s internal affairs under any circumstances.

“The Islamic Republic does not necessarily endorse everything. We, too, are concerned about some of the issues and problems in Afghanistan. All the people of Afghanistan are like part of the Islamic Republic’s own family. We offer reminders and advice, but we do not interfere,” Mortazavi said.

Although Iran has maintained strong economic and political relations with the Islamic Emirate over the past five years, it has not yet formally recognized the Islamic Emirate’s government.

Iran Offers to Mediate Between Afghanistan and Pakistan Amid Tensions
read more