More Than 400,000 Afghan Migrants Return From Pakistan in Four Months

According to the UNHCR official, around 5,000 Afghan migrants are returning to Afghanistan each day.

A number of Afghan migrants have criticized the continued deportation of Afghans from Pakistan, saying that harassment of Afghan nationals persists, including those who hold valid residency documents.

Zahir Bahand, a journalist in Pakistan, said: “Arrests by Pakistani police continue as before, and Afghan migrants are unable to move about freely. Their rights in Pakistan are being violated.”

Speaking to a Pakistani journalist, the spokesperson for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Pakistan said that more than 400,000 Afghan migrants have returned to Afghanistan over the past four months.

Qaiser Afridi stated that more than 800,000 Afghan nationals holding Proof of Registration (PoR) cards and 600,000 holding Afghan Citizen Cards (ACC) are still living in Pakistan.

He added that more than 100,000 Afghans who arrived in Pakistan after the political changes of 2021 and have refugee cases pending are currently residing in the country.

According to the UNHCR official, around 5,000 Afghan migrants are returning to Afghanistan each day.

Afridi urged the Pakistani government to continue supporting Afghan migrants, as it has done over the past four decades, and to refrain from linking all Afghan migrants to terrorism.

“We want the government and people of Pakistan to continue the support they have provided to Afghans over the past 40 years and to improve the current situation rather than increasing pressure on them,” he said.

The development comes as UNAMA estimates that more than 2.8 million additional Afghan migrants could return from Pakistan and Iran during the current year.

More Than 400,000 Afghan Migrants Return From Pakistan in Four Months
read more

UN Report Highlights Education Ban, Security and Economic Strains

The UN recorded 3,687 security incidents in Afghanistan between February and April 2026, up 57.7% from a year earlier.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres, in his latest quarterly report on Afghanistan, highlighted the ban on girls’ education, civilian casualties caused by Pakistani airstrikes and shelling along the Hypothetical Durand Line, the displacement of residents in affected areas, the country’s humanitarian and economic challenges, and declining international aid. He warned that Afghanistan is facing worsening humanitarian, economic, and security conditions.

The report, submitted to the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly, states that around 2.6 million Afghan girls remain out of school, while Afghan female UN employees are still barred from returning to work.

According to the report, the United Nations recorded 3,687 security-related incidents in Afghanistan between February and April 2026, representing a 57.7% increase compared with the same period last year.

However, Guterres noted that these incidents have not posed a significant threat to the Islamic Emirate’s control of the country.

The report further states that 372 civilians were martyred and 392 others injured between January and March 2026 as a result of Pakistani airstrikes and shelling along the Hypothetical Durand Line.

The attacks also displaced nearly 94,000 people, most of them women and children.

Guterres called on Afghanistan and Pakistan to resolve their differences through dialogue, reduce tensions, and restore normal trade and transit links between the two countries.

The report says Afghanistan’s economy remained under pressure during the first months of 2026 due to declining foreign aid, trade disruptions, climate-related shocks, rising inflation, and the large number of returnees from neighboring countries.

According to the report, trade through Pakistan has declined by more than 90 percent since crossing points were closed in October 2025, prompting Afghanistan to increasingly rely on routes through Iran and Central Asia.

The report also notes that Afghanistan’s humanitarian situation remains fragile. An estimated 21.9 million people, or about 45 percent of the population, are expected to require humanitarian assistance in 2026.

Guterres said that although opium poppy cultivation has declined following the Islamic Emirate’s ban on narcotics, many farmers continue to face serious economic difficulties because of the lack of viable alternative livelihoods.

The UN Secretary-General added that UNAMA continues to play a vital role in coordinating humanitarian assistance, facilitating political engagement, and monitoring the human rights situation in Afghanistan.

UN Report Highlights Education Ban, Security and Economic Strains
read more

Disagreements Over UNAMA’s Role Surface at UN Security Council

The U.S. representative also stressed the need for the prompt appointment of a new UNAMA chief.

With just one week remaining before the expiration of UNAMA’s mandate in Afghanistan, Russia’s representative at a UN Security Council meeting on Afghanistan said that what she described as the West’s instrumental use of UNAMA has put the mission’s future at risk.

The Russian diplomat also called for the swift appointment of a new head of UNAMA, stressing that the views of Afghanistan’s current authorities should be taken into account in the process.

Anna Evstigneeva, Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations, said: “The time has come for these countries to understand that such actions only aggravate existing challenges and jeopardize the future of UNAMA’s mission—a future that, unfortunately, remains uncertain due to the positions of some Security Council members. It is unlikely that the Afghan authorities would be interested in a UN presence and monitoring mechanism that serves only the interests of the forces that left Afghanistan in August 2021.”

China’s representative also highlighted UNAMA’s role in fostering coordination between Afghanistan and the international community and emphasized Beijing’s support for extending the mission’s mandate.

Fu Cong, China’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, said: “As the penholder on Afghanistan at the Security Council, China will make every effort to build consensus among Council members and ensure the successful extension of UNAMA’s mandate, in order to support Afghanistan’s development, stability, and its early integration into the international community.”

In contrast, the United States described UNAMA as the United Nations’ most expensive political mission and called for an assessment and review of its operations and effectiveness.

The U.S. representative also stressed the need for the prompt appointment of a new UNAMA chief.

Jeffrey Bartos, U.S. Representative for UN Management and Reform, said: “The United States appreciates council members using the upcoming mandate renewal to improve UNAMA’s effectiveness, and we look forward to the adoption of a streamlined resolution.On the diplomatic front, the UN-led comprehensive approach provides a potential path forward and the Taliban must engage seriously.”

The Islamic Emirate has not yet issued any new comments regarding the extension of UNAMA’s mandate or the mission’s operations. However, Zabihullah Mujahid, the spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, had previously stated that UNAMA has not been able to provide effective political representation in Afghanistan.

Mujahid had also expressed hope that the next head of UNAMA would help facilitate closer relations between Afghanistan and the international community.

These differing views on UNAMA’s performance come as the UN Security Council is expected to decide on the extension of the mission’s mandate in Afghanistan during a special session scheduled for next week.

Disagreements Over UNAMA’s Role Surface at UN Security Council
read more

UN protests women’s arrests in Afghanistan for alleged clothing violations

By ELENA BECATOROS

Associated Press

The United Nations’ mission in Afghanistan has expressed concern over what it says are arrests and detentions of women in western Afghanistan for allegedly not adhering to regulations governing how they should dress.

The U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan said on X late Sunday that the arrests and detentions in the city of Herat raise “serious human rights concerns.”

It did not provide details. Afghanistan’s Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice dismissed the reports of arrests as “rumors.”

“We remind the de facto authorities that all people have the right to freedom of movement and that all persons, both women and men, are entitled to equality before the law,” the U.N. mission said on X. It had expressed concern over similar arrests in the Afghan capital, Kabul, last year.

A human rights monitor, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release details to the media, said Monday that monitors had verified at least 16 arrests and detentions, including of a pregnant woman, in Herat since Friday over alleged non-compliance with dress requirements.

On Friday, imams in mosques in Herat issued announcements during prayers on behalf of the vice and virtue ministry that women were not allowed to leave their homes without wearing the hijab. The human rights monitor said the arrests and detentions began shortly after that.

“The issues being spread about women being arrested in Herat are all rumors,” the vice and virtue ministry’s information office said in a statement. It added that “hijab is a divine command, a law that we are obliged to implement.” The headscarf and loose clothing cover the entire body.

Afghan authorities have imposed draconian restrictions on women and girls since the Taliban seized power in the country in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of U.S.-led forces. They have included bans on education beyond primary school and on working in all but very few professions, as well as strict regulations on what women are allowed to wear in public.

Government regulations stipulate that women can only go out in public when wearing full hijab as well as a face covering that leaves only the eyes visible. Many women in Afghanistan use face masks like those worn during the COVID pandemic to comply with regulations.

 

UN protests women’s arrests in Afghanistan for alleged clothing violations
read more

Taliban Forces Fire On Afghan Women Protesting New Restrictions

WATCH: Taliban Security Forces Fire On Afghan Women’s Rights Protesters

Afghanistan’s Taliban government used live fire to disperse a protest in the western city of Herat over new restrictions on women, eyewitnesses told RFE/RL’s Radio Azadi.

One eyewitness said that at least one person was killed and several were wounded in the protest led by women’s rights activists. RFE/RL could not independently verify the claim.

The militant Islamist group, which seized power in 2021, denied its security forces used gunfire to disperse the demonstrators.

The small protest on June 9 came after members of the Taliban’s notorious morality police reportedly arrested or detained several women for violating new restrictions over women’s public appearances.

In a directive issued last week, the Taliban prohibited women from appearing in public without what they described as a “proper hijab,” or Islamic head scarf.

Women who failed to comply with the Islamic dress code, including those showing their faces or wearing makeup — would face punitive measures, according to the directive.

The United Nations mission in Afghanistan has expressed concern over the crackdown on women in ⁠Herat for ‌allegedly failing to comply with the Taliban’s new directive.

“UNAMA is ⁠concerned over multiple arrests and ‌detentions of women in Herat…for alleged non-compliance with dress requirements, which raises serious human rights concerns,” UNAMA said in a post on X on June 7.

Taliban authorities in Herat denied that there have been mass detentions.

Crackdown On Women

Protests are rare under the Taliban, which has ruled Afghanistan with an iron fist since regaining power. The group has waged a violent crackdown on dissent, arresting, beating, and torturing activists and journalists, according to human rights groups.

Women have borne the brunt of the Taliban’s attempts to impose their extreme version of Islam on the war-torn country of some 40 million people.

The hard-line group has largely erased women from public life and imposed severe restrictions on their appearances, freedom of movement, and right to work and study.

In November, the Taliban barred female patients, visitors, and medical staff who do not wear the all-encompassing burqa from entering public hospitals in Herat, the country’s third largest city. It is unclear if the measure has been extended nationwide.

In August 2024, the Taliban enacted a morality law that imposed severe restrictions on women. Under the law, women are required to fully cover their faces and bodies when in public and are banned from wearing “transparent, tight, or short” clothing.

The enforcement of the extremist group’s laws, however, has been sporadic and uneven across the country and often left to the discretion of local Taliban leaders.

Many Afghan women wear a hijab, or Islamic head scarf, which covers the head and neck. In addition, some women wear a face mask to conceal their nose and mouth.

Other women don the burqa or an Islamic abaya robe and niqab that covers the hair, body, and most of the face. The latter is common in Arab countries in the Persian Gulf.

Afghan women, especially those in urban areas, consider the burqa and niqab to be alien to Afghan culture. Before the Taliban’s return to power, many women wore loose headscarves that only concealed their hair.

Taliban Forces Fire On Afghan Women Protesting New Restrictions
read more

Why the U.S. is detaining a senior Afghan diplomat

By Lennart Pfahler
POLITICO
Raheem Peerzada has been in immigration detention for more than a year.

Previously sealed court documents are shedding light for the first time on the reasons behind the arrest of a senior Afghan diplomat in the United States.

Raheem Peerzada, who also goes by the name Mohammed Rahim Wahidi, was detained by U.S. immigration officers on March 30, 2025, at Washington Dulles International Airport. WELT, a publication owned by Axel Springer, POLITICO’s parent company, had previously revealed that several women, including an Afghan woman living in Germany, accuse Peerzada of sexually harassing or raping them. Afghan activists have also raised corruption allegations against the former head of Afghanistan’s embassy in Madrid.

Peerzada has been held in U.S. immigration detention since his arrest. Until now, the reasons had remained opaque. According to documents obtained by POLITICO, the U.S. immigration court agency EOIR accuses Peerzada of continuing to work for the Afghan embassy after the Taliban seized power in 2021. In the United States, the Taliban are designated as a terrorist organization.

Unlike other Afghan diplomatic missions, the Madrid embassy under Peerzada allegedly coordinated with the Taliban. Peerzada’s conduct, a federal judge wrote in a May 2025 decision, “had a tendency to promote, sustain and maintain the Taliban.” It should therefore be regarded as “material support” for the Taliban, the ruling said.

Peerzada’s arrest was first reported by POLITICO and was seen in the United States as a symptom of the Trump administration’s hard-line approach to immigrants. In April, Peerzada’s lawyer again petitioned a federal court for his release. No hearing date has yet been set.

WELT’s reporting on the diplomat’s alleged abuse also played a role in Peerzada’s questioning. Several women had accused the Afghan diplomat of using his position as head of the diplomatic mission in Madrid to try to initiate sexual relationships. One woman, who later left Spain for Germany and still lives there, says Peerzada raped her in 2022 — allegedly after she had been given knockout drops. Shortly after WELT’s investigation was published, Peerzada’s tenure at the embassy came to an end. Spain ordered him to leave the country.

When Peerzada entered the United States in March 2025, U.S. border officers from the Department of Homeland Security questioned him at Washington Dulles International Airport. They also asked him how he explained the abuse allegations. Peerzada replied that there were people who wanted to destroy his reputation. “Because I was very active in Afghanistan,” he said.

The officers repeatedly asked Peerzada whether he understood the definitions of rape, “consent to a sexual act” and “drugs.” Peerzada said he did, but denied any wrongdoing. One of his statements is recorded as follows: “Europe a lot is legal. If you want to go to a girl and say ‘Hey, do you want to clap,’ then you get a girl.”

During the questioning, U.S. officials also quoted from a Facebook message found as a screenshot in the “deleted” folder on his phone. In it, someone had written to him: “There is nothing left to talk about. You raped her 2.5 years ago. Now you have to wait and see what happens. I promise you, you will be on the news.” Asked about the message, Peerzada said: “This guy wants to make bad name for me.“

The officers also showed significant interest in Peerzada’s connection to his brother-in-law, Farhad Shakeri, whom U.S. authorities accuse of plotting contract killings on behalf of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. According to an indictment filed by prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, Shakeri was allegedly tasked, among other things, with killing U.S. President Donald Trump. He is also alleged to have recruited people in the United States, in exchange for large cash payments, to surveil Iranian opposition figures and ultimately kill them. One of the defendants was sentenced in January to 15 years in prison. Shakeri remains at large and is believed to be in Tehran.

During his airport interrogation, Peerzada said he had met Shakeri in Afghanistan in 2009. A friend, he said, had told him he could visit the family — “and marry a girl.” That was how he met Shakeri’s sister, a U.S. citizen, whom he eventually married. After that, he said, he regularly met Shakeri for dinner at a restaurant after work.

Peerzada gave contradictory statements on whether he had helped Shakeri financially. At one point, he said he had given his brother-in-law small amounts of money between 2009 and 2023. Later, he denied doing so. He also said he had cut off all contact with Shakeri, saying Shakeri had brought shame upon the family.

Peerzada’s defense argues there is no evidence that he financially supported the alleged Iranian agent. In a habeas petition, the former diplomat’s lawyer argues that the U.S. government initially sought to link Peerzada to his brother-in-law, Farhad Shakeri. When no reliable evidence emerged to support that claim, the government shifted to a new theory: that Wahidi’s diplomatic work in Madrid amounted to alleged support for the Taliban.

The defense disputes that. Peerzada worked for the former, internationally recognized Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, not for the Taliban, his lawyers argue. The central piece of evidence — the airport interrogation — was also flawed, according to his lawyer. He claims, the questioning was conducted without a lawyer, without an interpreter and with the help of translation software. Peerzada also never signed the transcript.

Why the U.S. is detaining a senior Afghan diplomat
read more

Pakistan raises Afghanistan concerns with U.S.

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar discussed security threats originating from Afghanistan territory during talks with senior U.S. officials in Washington.

According to Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry, Dar raised concerns over what Islamabad described as the use of Afghanistan soil by militant organisations to carry out attacks inside Pakistan. The two sides also discussed strengthening cooperation on counterterrorism, security, trade and investment.

The ministry said both countries agreed to advance bilateral engagement through high-level contacts and cooperation aimed at promoting regional peace, security and economic development. The United States has not yet issued a separate statement on the meeting.

Pakistan has repeatedly accused the Taliban administration in Afghanistan of failing to prevent militants, including members of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, from using Afghanistan territory to organise and launch attacks. Kabul has consistently rejected the allegations, insisting that Afghanistan territory is not being used against any neighbouring country.

The discussions took place amid heightened regional security concerns and growing diplomatic activity involving South Asia and the Middle East. Washington has recently intensified consultations with regional partners on security issues, including counterterrorism cooperation and stability in Afghanistan following continued cross-border violence.

The meeting also comes as U.S. officials continue negotiations with Iran over a possible extension of the current ceasefire. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said this week that Washington remains prepared to resume military strikes against Iran if diplomacy fails, while President Donald Trump has said he is reviewing a final proposal related to a potential agreement with Tehran.

Relations between Pakistan and the Taliban government have deteriorated significantly over the past two years due to security disputes. Islamabad has carried out airstrikes and military operations targeting suspected militant positions near the border, while clashes between Pakistani forces and Taliban fighters have periodically erupted along key crossing points.

The security situation has become one of the most contentious issues in relations between Kabul and Islamabad. Pakistani officials argue that attacks by the TTP have increased despite repeated requests for action, while Taliban authorities maintain that Pakistan’s security challenges are an internal matter and should not be blamed on Afghanistan.

Regional powers, including China, have encouraged dialogue between the two sides amid concerns that continued tensions could further destabilise border regions and undermine broader economic and connectivity projects across South and Central Asia.

Pakistan raises Afghanistan concerns with U.S.
read more

Truck carrying Afghan returnees from Pakistan flips on highway, killing 18

Al Jazeera
At least 10 children among the dead as a packed truck carrying families returning from Pakistan flips on major highway.

At least 18 people, including women and children, were killed when a cargo truck carrying recently returned Afghan refugees from Pakistan overturned on a major highway in eastern Afghanistan, authorities said.

Taliban government spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid said the crash took place in the Qarghayi district of Laghman province on Saturday.

The vehicle, heavily loaded with displaced families and their household belongings, veered off the road at approximately 5:30am local time (01:00 GMT) near the Surkhakan intersection in Qarghayi district.

The provincial Director of Public Health Aminullah Sharif said the accident occurred when the truck fell into a ditch after the driver fell asleep.

Authorities said at least 10 children were among the dead.

Abdul Malik Niazay, a spokesperson for the Laghman provincial governor, said more than 30 other passengers were injured, some critically. The families had been temporarily staying in eastern Kunar province and were en route to the capital, Kabul.

Emergency services quickly transferred the wounded to medical facilities in neighbouring Nangarhar province, where several remain in intensive care.

The central government expressed formal condolences to the families of the victims. The Taliban’s Mujahid said in a post on X, “we pray for the speedy recovery of the injured”, adding that he was “deeply saddened” by the tragedy which took place at the end of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha.

Meanwhile, the National Disaster Management Authority announced 730,000 afghanis ($10,000) in emergency financial assistance for the affected families.

Advertisement

Deadly traffic accidents are common in Afghanistan, where highways are severely degraded after decades of conflict, vehicles are poorly maintained, and traffic regulations are seldom enforced.

At least 20 people have been killed in three separate traffic accidents reported across Afghanistan over the past 10 days, according to local Taliban authorities and media reports.

The tragedy highlights the growing strain on transportation infrastructure as hundreds of thousands of Afghans return from neighbouring countries. According to United Nations figures, more than 447,000 Afghans have crossed back from Pakistan this year alone following a sustained crackdown on undocumented migrants by Islamabad. International aid groups warn that forced expulsions are compelling families to travel in hazardous, packed commercial cargo trucks.

Truck carrying Afghan returnees from Pakistan flips on highway, killing 18
read more

Afghan president voiced concern over civilians killed by SAS troops, inquiry told

Concerns about the number of Afghan civilians being killed by British special forces in the early part of the last decade prompted the country’s then president to make a “muscular” complaint to Nato commanders fighting the Taliban.

Newly released evidence from a public inquiry into the deaths of up to 80 people during an SAS deployment also showed that Afghan partner military forces were no longer willing to work alongside the British by the spring of 2011.

The statements are contained in redacted and summarised evidence of a special forces staff officer, known only as N1788, who had been responsible for reviewing tactics used in operations that led to civilians repeatedly being killed.

“President Hamid Karzai was very ‘muscular’ in addressing the issue” of British detention operations “with Nato’s chain of command”, according to the summary of N1788’s two days of evidence, first given in the autumn of 2024.

Around the same time, the evidence summary said, “everyone was aware that some of the Afghan partner units were being reluctant to go on operations” with the British special forces sub-unit, known only as SU1.

This became “a major issue for campaigns” across the Nato-led forces operating in Afghanistan and emerged at the same time as the US president Barack Obama had increased the number of US troops in Afghanistan to try to deal with a growing Taliban insurgency. “It was a known issue and a big deal,” the summary of the evidence said.

In April 2011, the staff officer had been asked to review a recurring procedure in which Afghan males were asked by the SAS to come back inside a family compound that had been the subject of a special forces raid, typically at night-time.

On several occasions, the Afghan men were said to have produced weapons and were promptly killed. N1788 told the inquiry that there were concerns that the procedure had become an “inefficient practice”. Sometimes there were fewer weapons discovered than there were Afghans killed.

Asked by the chair of the inquiry, Charles Haddon-Cave, to explain what that phrase meant, N1788 said there were concerns that a tactic that had been designed to reduce the threat to British forces and civilians had become counterproductive.

Separating off Afghan adult males during raids had “directly increased the propensity of kinetic [ie military] activity”, N1788 said. It was “undermining the very reason it was designed for … which was to de-escalate”, he added.

Evidence from a second soldier, N2252, who was chief of staff to the director of the UK’s special forces in 2010 and 2011, said there had been a high degree of pressure to deliver because many British soldiers had been killed in 2010.

“As I’ve said to you, we wanted to do things right. We’d all been to lots of funerals in 2009/2010, 100-plus people killed in 2010. We didn’t want that to happen again,” N2252 said. But he said that the tactic of separating off Afghan males during raids had led to “unintended consequences”.

Concerns about the lethal conduct of the SAS in Helmand province in Afghanistan have been circulating since, leading to the setting up of the public inquiry in December 2022. It began with a handful of public hearings the following October, covering UK special forces deployments between 2010 and 2013, though since then progress has been slow.

Hearings involving former members of the special forces, with the exception of former MP Johnny Mercer, have largely been held in private without press or public present and evidence is then summarised and redacted to comply with official requests to maintain secrecy around the day-to-day activities of the SAS.

The inquiry has also heard allegations that two Afghan adults were shot dead while sleeping with children next to them, in evidence presented by Richard Hermer KC, who has since become attorney general.

Another British soldier told his superiors at the time that he believed the SAS had a policy in Afghanistan to “kill all males on target whether they posed a threat or not” – a practice colloquially described as “flat packing”.

An MOD spokesperson said“The government is fully committed to supporting the independent inquiry relating to Afghanistan as it continues its work, and we are hugely grateful to all former and current Defence employees who have so far given evidence.

“We also remain committed to providing the support that our special forces deserve, whilst maintaining the transparency and accountability that the British people rightly expect from their armed forces.

“It’s right that we allow the inquiry to complete its important work before responding in full.”

Afghan president voiced concern over civilians killed by SAS troops, inquiry told
read more

UN Concerned Over Obstacles to Aid Deliveries in Afghanistan

Washington has maintained that, under this directive, any aid that could potentially reach the Islamic Emirate remains suspended.

With tensions continuing across the Middle East, the United Nations has expressed concern over the growing challenges affecting the delivery of humanitarian assistance to Afghanistan.

The World Food Programme (WFP) had previously warned that restrictions at Iranian ports and disruptions to maritime transport routes have significantly reduced food stocks intended for malnourished mothers and children.

In response to the situation, the United States Department of State told VOA’s Afghanistan Service that, after four years in power, the Islamic Emirate must assume a more active and responsible role in ensuring the health and well-being of the Afghan people.

Commenting on the issue, economic analyst Sir Qureshi said: “The U.S. State Department has stated that Afghanistan should address this challenge itself. The solution is therefore quite clear: the country must focus more on domestic production and reduce its dependence on imports. Afghanistan possesses abundant arable land, a capable workforce, and rich mineral resources that can be utilized.”

Amid these concerns, U.S. assistance to Afghanistan has been broadly suspended since January 2025, following President Donald Trump’s directive to halt and review foreign aid programs.

As a result, nearly a year and a half has passed during which a significant portion of this assistance has either been discontinued or severely restricted.

Washington has maintained that, under this directive, any aid that could potentially reach the Islamic Emirate remains suspended.

Another economic analyst, Abdul Shakoor Hadawal, said: “The people of Afghanistan have long relied on foreign assistance. Unfortunately, since the Islamic Emirate came to power and large numbers of migrants returned to the country, many donor nations have reduced their support. Therefore, there is a clear need for the Islamic Emirate to take its own measures to reduce poverty and address this crisis.”

So far, the Islamic Emirate has not commented on the matter.

Meanwhile, the closure of crossings between Afghanistan and Pakistan, along with restrictions affecting routes through Iran and Dubai, has seriously disrupted the transportation of food aid to Afghanistan and reduced vulnerable populations’ access to essential supplies.

Under these circumstances, the continuation of regional tensions has further weakened humanitarian supply chains, highlighting more than ever the need for secure and sustainable routes to ensure the delivery of aid.

UN Concerned Over Obstacles to Aid Deliveries in Afghanistan
read more