US Defense Secretary: No More Aimless Wars for Washington

Speaking at the annual Shangri-La Security Dialogue in Singapore, he emphasized that the United States is shifting away from this approach.

Pete Hegseth, the United States Secretary of Defense, stated that Washington will no longer repeat the mistake of engaging in “aimless” wars like those in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Speaking at the annual Shangri-La Security Dialogue in Singapore, he emphasized that the United States is shifting away from this approach.

The Defense Secretary said: “We became distracted by open-ended wars, regime change, and nation building. I had a front row seat as a soldier in Iraq and Afghanistan. These costly diversions lacked clearly defined goals and were not tied to vital and core American interests. President Trump is changing that. We are not making the same mistakes. Not this generation and not now.  We are done with that approach.”

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump, speaking at a meeting in the White House, once again called the withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan “shameful.”

Trump said that with America’s exit from Afghanistan in 2021, military equipment worth billions of dollars was left behind.

“We had the embarrassment in Afghanistan, where we gave up billions and billions of dollars of military equipment — the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country, I believe,” Trump said during a press conference with tech entrepreneur Elon Musk.

Some political analysts said that Washington now leans toward a more pragmatic approach regarding Afghanistan.

Mohammad Aslam Danishmal, a university professor, said: “The United States’ distrust toward the interim government is now significant. America is trying to act based on safeguarding its interests. The interim government must strive to gain a good understanding of America’s regional interests.”

Previously, Trump had repeatedly criticized the US military’s strategy, stating that for the past two decades, under the banner of nation-building missions, the military had been deployed to countries where there was no real need for an American presence.

US Defense Secretary: No More Aimless Wars for Washington
read more

Pakistan Upgrades Diplomatic Representation in Kabul to Ambassador

The country’s deputy prime minister stated that the goal of this move is to enhance interactions and cooperation between Kabul and Islamabad.

Pakistan is upgrading the head of its embassy in Kabul from chargé d’affaires to ambassador.

The country’s foreign minister and deputy prime minister stated that the goal of this move is to enhance interactions and cooperation between Kabul and Islamabad.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan welcomed Islamabad’s recent decision to elevate its diplomatic relations in Kabul from chargé d’affaires to ambassador.

Zia Ahmad Takal, head of public relations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said: “The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will also reciprocally upgrade the level of its chargé d’affaires in Islamabad to ambassador. Elevating the level of diplomatic relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan will pave the way for expanding cooperation between the two countries across many sectors.”

This development comes as the foreign ministers of China and Pakistan, in a bilateral meeting, emphasized the importance of international organizations in mediating improved relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan, considering it an effective step towards increasing trust and cooperation between the two countries.

Sayed Moqaddam Amin, a political analyst, stated: “Pakistan’s recent decision to upgrade its chargé d’affaires in Afghanistan to ambassador is another positive move by the Pakistani government. I hope this step, considering the vital interests of both parties and by fostering good relations and friendship, will provide a solution to existing challenges and deepen the political and diplomatic relations between Kabul and Islamabad.”

Salim Paigir, another political analyst, said: “The Pakistanis must forget the notion of a ‘Greater Afghanistan’ and recognize the fact that all the resources in Afghanistan belong to the Afghan people. Afghans will not allow anyone to plunder them. I believe that the Pakistanis can establish stable relations with us.”

Yesterday, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar described his recent visit to Kabul as productive and said that relations with Afghanistan are on the path to improvement.

He also announced that in order to expand interactions and cooperation with Afghanistan, Pakistan would elevate its diplomatic mission in Kabul from chargé d’affaires to ambassadorial level.

Pakistan Upgrades Diplomatic Representation in Kabul to Ambassador
read more

Removing Protected Status for Afghans in the U.S. is No Way to Treat Allies

By ,  and 

Just Security
Quince Institute

We still remember the day Kabul fell. So many Afghans who worked shoulder to shoulder with Americans in military, diplomatic, and development missions immediately knew the risks they faced under the Taliban regime, who saw them not as civilians but as traitors and infidels. These Afghan partners of the United States knew that staying behind meant grave danger and even death.

Thousands ran to the airport without a plan — just fear. Amazingly, what they found there, amid the chaos, was that groups from across Afghanistan, the United States, and the world were working together to evacuate at-risk Afghans in a matter of days. Our organization, Georgetown University’s Institute for Women, Peace, and Security, was among those helping evacuate women who faced threats to their lives because of their work to advance women’s rights.

At great personal peril, Afghans left their belongings, their homes, and their loved ones behind. Leaving was the difference between life and death. That is the reason thousands were granted temporary protected status (TPS) in the United States in the first place. More than 8,200 Afghans were covered by the protection last year. TPS is a humanitarian immigration status granted by the U.S. government to people coming from the most at-risk countries, where conditions such as war or other extraordinary crises make it unsafe or impossible to return. Afghans were granted TPS because the United States recognized how dire and dangerous the situation had become in Afghanistan under Taliban control and the incredible risks faced by those with affiliations with Americans and democratic values. These Afghans stood with America and American values, and America ultimately stood by them in their moment of peril.

Until now.

In April, news emerged that the Trump administration planned to end the TPS designation for Afghanistan. On May 12, the Department of Homeland Security issued the formal announcement that the program would expire on May 20 and that TPS status for Afghans living in the United States would be terminated as on July 14. That could lead to the deportation of Afghans currently living in the country. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s justification for this action: “Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilizing economy no longer prevents them from returning to their home country.”

The facts do not support this statement.

We received this news just days after convening more than 20 Afghan women refugees who fled the country after the Taliban takeover and now reside in the United States. Every single one of them spoke of the horrors facing their sisters, friends, loved ones, and communities who remain in Afghanistan. Every one of them spoke about the brutality of the Taliban, the insecurity, the lack of the most basic needs like food and health services, and the lack of economic opportunity. These women leaders in the United States know what all Afghans know: the situation in the country is less secure and less stable than ever.

‘Improved Security’ vs. Reality

Let’s look at the facts.

Noem cites an “improved security situation” in Afghanistan. But the U.S. State Department describes travel to Afghanistan at the highest risk: “do not travel, due to armed conflict, civil unrest, crime, terrorism, and kidnapping. Travel to all areas of Afghanistan is unsafe.” Terrorist groups continue to pose threats in Afghanistan, specifically the Islamic State-Khorasan Province (ISIS-K). Al-Qaeda also continues to have a presence in Afghanistan.

Killings and disappearances happen far too often in Afghanistan. A 2023 report by the Oslo, Norway-based Human Rights Research League documented more than 400 revenge killings of individuals with links to the United States or the former Afghan government, across all 34 provinces. The victims were government workers, civil society members, human rights defenders — people just like those who fled to the United States in Operation Allies Refuge and Operation Allies Welcome, which the Department of Homeland Security touted at the time. A 2023 report by the United Nations Mission in Afghanistan confirmed that more than 200 former Afghan government officials and security personnel had been extrajudicially killed. These documented cases likely represent just a small fraction of the killings taking place today in Afghanistan. Additionally, censorship has become tighter, and threats against any perceived dissent have remained swift and harsh.

The situation for Afghan women and girls under the Taliban is the worst in the world. The Taliban have been engaged in a draconian assault on women’s rights, determined to erase women and girls from public life. They have issued dozens of edicts, codified under so-called “morality law,” forbidding women to show their faces in public and silencing their voices, even to recite the Quran. Education is prohibited for girls over 12 and strict punishments are inflicted on those attending secret home schools. This has impacted more than 2.2 million Afghan girls who can no longer get a full education. Women are not allowed to work in public. Maternal mortality rates remain very high, yet women have been banned from training to be midwives. Drivers cannot transport women without a male guardian. In a recent proclamation, buildings are not to have windows through which it is possible to see areas in the home used by women. These rules strive to make women invisible. One third of Afghan girls are in forced marriages. Domestic violence has increased.

Meanwhile, religious police are empowered to arrest, detain, disappear, and kill women arbitrarily. Suicide rates among women and girls are on the rise since the Taliban took power. This systematic oppression is nothing less than gender apartheid. Recent reports detail underage girls being sold by their families for food and girls and women who self-immolated rather than being forced into marriage with Taliban soldiers. The situation is so egregious that in a landmark decision on Oct. 4, 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that Afghan women are presumed to face persecution under the Taliban regime solely based on their gender and nationality, thereby qualifying them for refugee status without the need for individual assessments.

Humanitarian Crises and Human Rights Abuses

Noem also points to Afghanistan’s “stabilizing economy” as a justification for ending TPS. However, conditions in Afghanistan are so dire that it is still considered to be one of the largest humanitarian crises in the world. Almost two-thirds of the population requires assistance to survive, and 3 million people are dangerously close to famine. About 1.84 million Afghans are left without critical medical care. The crisis has been exacerbated by severe cuts in U.S. humanitarian assistance. Moreover, Afghanistan is impacted by prolonged droughts, water scarcity, and rising temperatures, which are intensifying the humanitarian crisis: livelihoods are being destroyed, agricultural yields are smaller, food insecurity is increasing, health risks are growing, and displacement is intensifying. The economy is precarious, and poverty pervasive.

​​Finally, Noem asserted in the May 12 announcement that some recipients of temporary protected status have been “under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security.” The statement offered no evidence. Certainly such issues would be a reason to investigate and hold those individuals accountable, but individual cases should not be used as collective punishment against the vast majority of law-abiding Afghans in the United States by scrapping the entire TPS designation.

Contrary to what the Department of Homeland Security claims, the situation in Afghanistan has not improved. In fact, under Taliban rule, the country has become one of the world’s worst human rights abusers, creating incredible risk for all Afghans – no matter their gender — and especially anyone perceived as supporting America.

If TPS is fully terminated on July 14, thousands of Afghan allies will be left out in the cold. Some won’t qualify for other forms of legal protections, such as special immigrant visas (SIVs) or asylum status – because of the criteria for these protections. Others may be deported before they can complete the slow and challenging legal process of attaining longer-term protections.

Deporting allies isn’t only an unjustified bureaucratic decision. It is a betrayal. It should be reversed and TPS should be extended, before more Afghans suffer and die at the hands of the Taliban.

Removing Protected Status for Afghans in the U.S. is No Way to Treat Allies
read more

How to get a national ID card in Afghanistan if you’re a Kuchi

Coming ‘home’ to Afghanistan 

Despite claims that obtaining a national identity card (tazkira) has become easier, many Afghans still encounter significant hurdles when they try to get one. The difficulties are particularly pronounced for returnees – those coming back after years in Pakistan or who were born there without ever having lived in Afghanistan – as well as for members of the nomadic Kuchi community. During the Republican era, obtaining a tazkira was relatively straightforward for Kuchis, but the process has become more cumbersome under the Islamic Emirate. AAN’s Nur Khan Himmat heard from one Kuchi woman who returned from Pakistan a year ago about her travails trying to get a national ID card.
I’m from the Kuchi community. We’re traditionally nomadic people who move with our animals across Afghanistan and Pakistan. Nowadays, though, many Kuchi families have settled down and don’t move from pasture to pasture like they used to.

Like many Kuchi families, my parents moved to Pakistan about 40 years ago because the civil war that was raging in Afghanistan had made our nomadic way of life impossible. I was born and raised in Pakistan. I got married there. All of my six children were born in Pakistan. My oldest is 16 and the youngest is just two.

But now, Afghans are no longer welcome in Pakistan and the government there has been forcing Afghans to leave. So last year, my family joined the thousands of others making the journey back to a home we’d never really known. At least this way, we left on our own terms.

You can’t get by without a tazkira 

When we first came to Afghanistan, I didn’t think about getting a tazkira. Most Kuchi women (and men) don’t have one. I never needed one in Pakistan. I’d heard people talking about getting a tazkira, but didn’t think I’d be needing one anytime soon. Anyway, there were more pressing things that my husband and I had to deal with. We had to get on with settling into our new life, finding our way around the system, and finding a school for the kids. Unfortunately, my older girls can’t go to school like they did in Pakistan and, anyway, there’s no school near our home, so my 10-year-old son and two of my daughters are going to a madrasa. But it soon became clear that, nowadays, you need a tazkira everywhere and for everything. For example, if you fall seriously ill and need to go abroad for treatment, or if you want to go on Hajj. You need a passport to do these things, and you can’t get one without a tazkira. Or, as it was in my case, if you need to prove that you’re an Afghan.

You’re not an Afghan without a Tazkira

One day, the office that helps people who’ve come back from Pakistan [the UN Refugee Agency, UNHCR] called us and told us we needed to go to their office. They said we were eligible for some additional assistance because we were registered refugees in Pakistan who’d returned to Afghanistan through official channels. They’d already given us USD 375 per person when we first arrived in Afghanistan, and now they were going to give us another USD 700 as a family. But when I went for the appointment, they asked for my tazkira. I told them I didn’t have one. They said they couldn’t give me the money without one because I had to prove I was an Afghan. So they didn’t give me the money. They told me to come back after I got my tazkira.

This was a serious setback. We’d waited a long time – about eight months – for them to contact us. And while this might not seem like a lot of money to most people, for our family, it was a fortune. We’d been struggling to make ends meet since we came back, and this money would go a long way in helping us settle into life in Afghanistan.

Bureaucracy reigns supreme

We left the office with heavy hearts. I told my husband I needed to apply for a tazkira as soon as possible. He agreed and we went together to the census department in Kandahar the next morning. But when we gave them my application, they said I needed to bring an usuli relative [a first-line blood relative such as a father, brother, uncle, cousin, or nephew] to vouch for me. I don’t have any close relatives. My father died in Pakistan seven years ago and I have no brothers or sisters. They said I could bring two witnesses instead, but they had to have tazkiras. Finding two people with tazkiras who would vouch for me wasn’t easy. My husband and I had lived our entire lives in Pakistan and didn’t know very many people in Afghanistan. Most of the people we know are other Kuchis who are also returnees from Pakistan and in the same predicament we’re in.

My husband asked several people he’d met recently, but they all refused. He said he didn’t blame them. People are afraid to vouch for someone they don’t know well. What if that person turns out to be a criminal, a drug trafficker or a member of Daesh [ISKP, Islamic State in Khorasan Province]? It could land them in hot water.

Finding witnesses 

Finally, my husband found someone he knew who worked in a government department. He agreed to be one of our witnesses and gave my husband a copy of his tazkira. The other witness lived in Balkh province and sent us a copy of his tazkira through a mutual acquaintance who was coming to Kandahar.

But when we took the tazkiras to the census department, they told us that our witnesses had to come in person. Fortunately, one of them lived in Kandahar and said that he’d come whenever the second witness came to town. My husband called the other witness and asked if he could come down to Kandahar, but he said that he was very poor and couldn’t afford the fare. We offered to pay him double the travel cost. Thankfully, he agreed. He was a kind man who helped us a lot; we’ll always be grateful to him.

Finally, I was able to get my electronic tazkira. I was now officially an Afghan.

It’s not who you are, it’s who you know 

I’m not the only one who’s had trouble getting a tazkira; many Kuchi women face similar problems. Fortunately, my husband has a primary school education and managed to get his own tazkira about ten years ago, so he understood the process. He’s also very sociable and has a knack for making friends easily. In the end, it was his ability to connect with people that stood us in good stead. It allowed him to tap into the largess of his new friends and contacts and find two people who’d vouch for me.

I often think about the hoops we jumped through to prove I was Afghan and secure my tazkira. I realise now that proving you belong in your own country can be nearly impossible if you don’t have any connections. The Kuchis in Afghanistan have a proverb: “Khowar pa Hindostan ham khowar dai,” which means “The poor are poor even in India.” In other words, a person without means is without means wherever they go.

 

How to get a national ID card in Afghanistan if you’re a Kuchi
read more

Pakistan to send Ambassador to Afghanistan, upgrading Diplomatic Ties

Pakistan plans to send an ambassador to Afghanistan, upgrading diplomatic relations to strengthen cooperation in security, trade, and regional stability.

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, announced on Friday, May 30 that Islamabad is prepared to upgrade its diplomatic representation in Kabul from chargé d’affaires to ambassador level. In a recent statement, he described relations between Pakistan and the Taliban as moving in a “positive direction” following his recent visit to Kabul.

Dar expressed confidence that this upgrade would lead to increased engagement and deeper bilateral cooperation in economic, security, and trade sectors. He emphasized that the move aims to strengthen mutual collaboration between the two countries, which he described as “brotherly neighbors.”

Despite these diplomatic advancements, Pakistan, like many other countries, has not yet officially recognized the Taliban government. Recently, an informal trilateral meeting was held in Beijing between the foreign ministers of China, Pakistan, and the Taliban, signaling a willingness to foster closer ties.

Following the Beijing meeting, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi announced that Pakistan and the Taliban had agreed to exchange ambassadors soon. China welcomed this development and reiterated its support for strengthening relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Currently, diplomatic relations remain at the chargé d’affaires level, with Obaid-ur-Rehman Nizamani serving as Pakistan’s chargé d’affaires in Kabul, and Sardar Ahmed Shakeeb as the Taliban’s chargé d’affaires in Islamabad. Sources also indicate that Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is expected to visit Pakistan soon, possibly in June.

Tensions between Pakistan and the Taliban have persisted, largely due to security concerns and cross-border militant activities. However, both sides show willingness to improve cooperation to address these challenges.

China’s mediation has played a key role in easing tensions, facilitating dialogue, and encouraging Pakistan and the Taliban to strengthen diplomatic and economic ties for regional stability.

Pakistan to send Ambassador to Afghanistan, upgrading Diplomatic Ties
read more

Karzai: Ban on Girls’ Education Key to Lack of Intl Recognition

He pointed out that although many members of the interim government are not opposed to girls’ education, he remains hopeful that the situation will improve.

Former Afghan President Hamid Karzai told a Russian media outlet that the ban on girls’ education by the Islamic Emirate is a major reason for the international community’s refusal to recognize the current government.

Karzai described girls’ education as a critical issue, stating: “The development of Afghanistan and the reduction of Afghan migration to other countries are directly linked to safeguarding girls’ right to education.”

The former president emphasized: “We want our girls to attend school. We want schools and universities in Afghanistan to be open and for our girls to fully participate in the education process. For Afghans to remain in their homeland, there must be hope for a better future and strong relations with the world.”

In his remarks, Karzai identified girls’ deprivation of education as a major obstacle not only to the recognition of the interim government but also to the overall social welfare of the country.

He pointed out that although many members of the interim government are not opposed to girls’ education, he remains hopeful that the situation will improve.

Karzai stated: “This issue is a serious barrier to both the well-being of the Afghan people and the recognition of the government by the international community. The vast majority of the Taliban support girls’ education. I am very hopeful that progress will be made in this area.”

Yesterday, Karzai also expressed hope that his daughter, who recently completed her primary education, would be able to continue her studies alongside other Afghan girls through to the end of high school and pursue higher education to achieve her dreams, following the recent graduation of his son from high school in Kabul.

Karzai: Ban on Girls’ Education Key to Lack of Intl Recognition
read more

“One young woman dead is one too many”: Afghan Women Leaders Demand Global Action at GIWPS Convening

This convening was held under Chatham House rules. For the safety of our speakers, their identities and affiliations will remain private; however, their message should be shared widely. 

This month, the Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security (GIWPS) hosted its fourth annual convening for Afghan women leaders—a powerful gathering of more than 30 experts on Afghanistan, who are committed to defending the rights of women and girls in Afghanistan.

Over the course of several days, participants assessed the deteriorating conditions in Afghanistan and developed coordinated strategies to advance their advocacy. The convening culminated in an advocacy day on Capitol Hill, where the group met with nine congressional offices to deliver concrete policy recommendations to support Afghan women and girls.

The gathering brought together Afghan women across a range of technical sectors, ethnic groups, and regional backgrounds. Many of the participants were forced to flee Afghanistan—and some were evacuated by GIWPS—during the Taliban takeover in August 2021 because their roles as high-profile activists, civil society leaders, journalists, and government officials placed them at risk. Today, they continue to raise their voices from exile and support women and girls inside Afghanistan, bringing critical insights and strategic advocacy to one of the world’s most urgent human rights crises.

In their strategy sessions, participants described the worsening humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan—one that is falling hardest on women and girls. Since 2021, the Taliban has systematically dismantled women’s rights, banning girls from secondary education, barring women from most jobs, restricting mobility, and silencing female voices in public life.

“I went to bed a diplomat and woke up without a country,” said one participant, recalling the chaos of the evacuation.

A recent claim by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stated that Afghanistan’s security situation has “improved” to justify deporting Afghans who had received Temporary Protected Status (TPS) in the U.S. The reality is starkly different for all Afghans at risk of being deported, especially for women and girls. In fact, the Taliban’s gender-based discrimination is so severe that UN experts have described it as a form of gender apartheid.

Participants shared harrowing stories of women being forced into marriage to avoid Taliban retaliation and young women driven to suicide to escape these forced marriages and avoid retribution.

“One young woman dead is one too many,” a participant said.  It was a statement met with solemn nods around the room.

Yet, some international governments are beginning to engage diplomatically with the Taliban, a dangerous step towards normalizing this brutal regime. This normalization of the Taliban poses a grave threat, not only to Afghan women and girls but to global security and the international democratic order.

“The Taliban’s ideology is like COVID-19. It cannot be contained within Afghanistan’s borders,” warned one of the participants. “The world must act now to protect itself.”

During the convening, the Afghan women leaders developed a set of concrete policy recommendations, which they presented to US policymakers:

  • Avoid any steps that could lead to the normalization of the Taliban regime
  • Restore humanitarian aid, reverse funding cuts that negatively impact Afghan women and girls, and support education initiatives
  • Promote women’s participation in all international processes, such as the Doha process
  • Expand efforts to protect women and girls who were forced to flee Afghanistan at risk to their lives 
  • Enforce full compliance with the Women, Peace, and Security Act across relevant U.S. agencies
  • Pursue accountability of the Taliban under international law 

The insecurity in Afghanistan affects security around the world. The U.S. has supported women’s rights in Afghanistan for decades and must continue to do so. Afghanistan is facing a dire humanitarian situation, and these women leaders warned that if the Taliban is normalized, the spread of violence and systematic oppression against women would move beyond borders and undermine peace, democracy, and human rights everywhere.

Read a full list of recommendations from Afghan women leaders.

“One young woman dead is one too many”: Afghan Women Leaders Demand Global Action at GIWPS Convening
read more

Judge Blocks Shutdown of Biden-Era Migrant Entry Programs

The sweeping order applied to hundreds of thousands of people legally in the country through programs put in place for Ukrainians, Afghans and others.

A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from pulling legal protections from hundreds of thousands of people who entered the United States through Biden-era programs, ordering the government to restart processing applications for migrants who are renewing their status.

In a sweeping order that extended to Ukrainians and Afghans, as well as military members and their relatives, the judge, Indira Talwani of Federal District Court in Massachusetts, wrote that the Trump administration’s categorical termination of legal pathways for those groups was probably unlawful and had the potential to sow discord across the country.

The decision is a major victory for civil and immigrant rights groups that had sued to stop the administration amid a wider campaign by President Trump to strip legal status from a variety of groups living, working and studying in the country on a temporary basis.

Judge Talwani wrote that the overarching campaign to strip the protections from those who had already been granted them represented a major escalation by the Trump administration that would cause chaos once the programs were wound down.

In April, she had issued a similar order that applied more narrowly to hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans with temporary legal status through another program. The government is seeking a reversal of that decision before the Supreme Court.
Want to stay updated on what’s happening in Afghanistan, Russia and Ukraine? , and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.

“This court emphasizes, as it did in its prior order, that it is not in the public interest to manufacture a circumstance in which hundreds of thousands of individuals will, over the course of several months, become unlawfully present in the country, such that these individuals cannot legally work in their communities or provide for themselves and their families,” Judge Talwani wrote. “Nor is it in the public interest for individuals who enlisted and are currently serving in the United States military to face family separation, particularly where some of these individuals joined the military in part to help their loved ones obtain lawful status.”

As part of the order, Judge Talwani, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, also moved to certify all those affected as a class, extending blanket protections temporarily to those in several programs pending a final decision in the case.

They included Afghans who worked with the U.S. military during 20 years of war in Afghanistan; Ukrainians fleeing violence after Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022; and those in a family reunification program that allowed migrants from some Central and South American countries to join their family members in the United States while awaiting a visa.

While broad, the certification applied primarily to those who had already received humanitarian parole and were working to extend their status, receive another benefit or avail themselves of another legal pathway. It did not apply to individuals who had left the United States voluntarily and were living abroad.

The challenge was filed in response to an executive order by Mr. Trump on Jan. 20 that directed the government to end “all categorical parole programs” set up during the Biden administration. The termination of the initiatives is part of a wider push by the Trump administration to expand the definition of who is removable from the United States as it seeks to make good on Mr. Trump’s campaign promise to carry out mass deportations.

Though the decision on Wednesday is likely to be challenged, immigration advocates and lawyers lauded the move, calling it a step in the right direction and significant relief for families, some of whom had already lost protections and their ability to work.

Guerline Jozef, executive director and founder of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement that the news “should serve as a reminder that when we fight together, we win.”

“Whether we come from Ukraine or Haiti, Afghanistan or Nicaragua, Venezuela, Cuba, all those with humanitarian parole should have the freedom to live and work peacefully in their adopted communities and with their families,” she said.

Zach Montague is a Times reporter covering the U.S. Department of Education, the White House and federal courts.

Jazmine Ulloa is a national reporter covering immigration for The Times.

Judge Blocks Shutdown of Biden-Era Migrant Entry Programs
read more

Judge rules that Trump administration wrongly ended humanitarian parole for hundreds of thousands

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration wrongly ended humanitarian parole for hundreds of thousands of people allowed to live in the United States temporarily.

The decision is another legal setback for President Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportation, but it may prove temporary and its immediate impact was unclear.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston sided with people who were already admitted to the United States but were unable to renew their short-term permits. They cover parole policies that benefited Afghans, Ukrainians, Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans and children from Central American countries trying to join their parents in the U.S., among others.

Talwani, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said two orders by Department of Homeland Security officials to suspend renewals pending further review were unlikely to survive a legal challenge. One of the orders “gives no reasoned explanation” for the actions, she wrote.

“The ‘pause’ has now been in place for three months; the pause is, in effect, an indefinite suspension,” she wrote.

Tricia McLaughlin, a Homeland Security spokeswoman, said the administration acted within its authority.

“The Biden Administration abused the parole authority to allow millions of illegal aliens into the U.S. which further fueled the worst border crisis in U.S. history. Under federal law, Secretary (Kristi) Noem – in support of the President – has full authority to cancel or modify these policies. Doing so is a promise kept to the American people to secure our borders and protect our national security,” McLaughlin said.

A group of American citizens and immigrants earlier this year sued the Trump administration for ending the long-standing legal tool presidents have used to allow people from countries where there’s war or political instability to enter and temporarily live in the U.S. The humanitarian parole programs allowed in 875,000 migrants who have legal U.S. residents as sponsors.

The plaintiffs include eight immigrants who entered the U.S. legally before the Trump administration ended what it called the “broad abuse” of humanitarian parole. They can legally stay in the U.S. until their parole expires, but the administration stopped processing their applications for asylum, visas and other requests that might allow them to remain longer.

None are identified by their real names because they fear deportation. Among them are Maksym and Maria Doe, a Ukrainian couple; Alejandro Doe, who fled Nicaragua following the abduction and torture of his father; and Omar Doe, who worked for more than 18 years with the U.S. military in his home country of Afghanistan.

 

Judge rules that Trump administration wrongly ended humanitarian parole for hundreds of thousands
read more

Russian Defense Minister warns of over 20 radical groups with 15,000 fighters in Afghanistan

By Fidel Rahmati

Khaama Press

Russian Defense Minister warns over 20 radical groups with 15,000 fighters in Afghanistan threaten Central Asia’s security and stability.

Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov on Wednesday, 28, has warned that Afghanistan hosts more than 20 radical groups with over 15,000 fighters, posing a serious threat to Central Asia’s security. Speaking at a meeting of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) defense ministers, Belousov emphasized the ongoing danger these groups represent.

He specifically highlighted that radical groups in Afghanistan constitute the primary terrorist threat to Central Asian states. Belousov cautioned that these militants could infiltrate neighboring countries and beyond, exacerbating regional instability. Although he did not name specific groups, he mentioned foreign fighters from the Middle East joining armed factions in Afghanistan.

Belousov further accused Western powers of attempting to impose a strategic defeat on Russia and applying pressure on CSTO member states. He described the military-political situation in CSTO-controlled regions as tense, with escalating challenges faced by member countries.

In line with these efforts, CSTO Secretary-General Imangali Tasmagambetov announced plans to begin military equipment shipments to reinforce the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border starting in 2026. This multi-year program aims to bolster border defenses in three stages over five years.

Russia has also supported joint military exercises in Tajikistan since the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021. President Vladimir Putin underscored the importance of regional security in a meeting with Tajik President Emomali Rahmon, stating that threats emanating from Afghanistan require Russia’s active engagement to protect Central Asian neighbors.

The CSTO, comprising Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan, has expressed concern over groups like ISIS and radical movements operating in Afghanistan. To address these threats, CSTO members have strengthened security cooperation and maintained close relations with the Taliban to manage border and security risks.

Russian Defense Minister warns of over 20 radical groups with 15,000 fighters in Afghanistan
read more