Reprieve for Afghan women students facing forced return after US aid cuts

Yogita Limaye
South Asia and Afghanistan correspondent
BBC News
19 March 2025
AFP Afghan women students, with their heads covered with colourful scarves, take a test in a classroom in Ghazni, Afghanistan on 10 December, 2024AFP
The Taliban has imposed draconian restrictions on women, including banning them from universities

More than 80 Afghan women studying in Oman on US-funded scholarships – terminated last month due to Trump administration’s sweeping cuts to foreign aid – have received a temporary reprieve.

A US State Department spokesperson has told the BBC that funding will continue until 30 June, 2025.

“This is great news, and we are very grateful,” one student told the BBC, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals. “But I hope there will be a permanent solution.”

The women fled Taliban ruled Afghanistan to continue their studies abroad, but the abrupt freeze on US Agency for International Development (USAID) funds put them at risk of being sent back.

Since regaining power in Afghanistan nearly four years ago, the Taliban has imposed draconian restrictions on women, including banning them from universities.

The students in Oman were pursuing graduate and post-graduate degrees under the Women’s Scholarship Endowment (WSE), a USAID program launched in 2018 to fund studies in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

On 28 February, they were informed their scholarships were ending and that they would be sent back to Afghanistan within two weeks, prompting “shock and tears”.

“We are relieved now, but we are still deeply concerned about our future,” a student said. “If the scholarship is not renewed, we will be left with no option but to return to Afghanistan, where we cannot study, and our safety could be under threat as well.”

The US government has not responded to the BBC’s inquiries on when a final decision will be made.

The BBC has also contacted the government of Oman to find out whether it is seeking alternative funding.

Afghanistan’s Taliban government says it has been trying to resolve the issue of women’s education, but has also defended its supreme leader’s diktats, saying they are “in accordance with Islamic Sharia law”.

It has cracked down on women protesting for education and work, with many activists beaten, detained and threatened.

Women in Afghanistan describe themselves as “dead bodies moving around” under the regime’s policies.

Before the funding extension, a WSE staff member had told the BBC they were urgently “searching for alternative funding sources”. Calling the situation “dangerous and devastating”, the staff member warned that the students could face persecution and forced marriages upon return to Afghanistan.

The women, mostly in their 20s, qualified for scholarships in 2021 before the Taliban seized Afghanistan. Many continued their studies in Afghan universities until December 2022, when the Taliban banned higher education for women.

After 18 months in limbo, they said they fled to Pakistan last September.

USAID then facilitated their visas to Oman, where they arrived between October and November 2024.

The decision to slash American aid funding has come under the Trump administration and been implemented by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.

Additional reporting by Aakriti Thapar and Andrew Clarance

Reprieve for Afghan women students facing forced return after US aid cuts
read more

Rights group says Pakistan steps up pressure on Afghans to return home where they risk persecution

By MUNIR AHMEDAssociated Press

ISLAMABAD (AP) — A leading rights group said on Wednesday that Pakistan’s authorities have intensified pressure on Afghan refugees to go back to neighboring Afghanistan, where they risk persecution by the Taliban and face dire economic conditions.

“Pakistani officials should immediately stop coercing Afghans to return home and give those facing expulsion the opportunity to seek protection,” said Elaine Pearson, Asia director at New York-based Human Rights Watch.

“The Taliban authorities in Afghanistan should prevent any reprisals against returning Afghans and reverse their abusive policies against women and girls,” she said.

Pakistan set a March 31 deadline for the deportation of all foreigners living illegally in the country. Most of them are Afghans.

The HRW appeal came a month after the Afghan Embassy in Islamabad said that Pakistan has stepped up arrests of Afghan citizens in Islamabad and nearby Rawalpindi for forced expulsion.

However, Pakistan has dismissed the allegation by Kabul, saying that the authorities were only trying to facilitate conditions for the swift return of Afghans to their home country.

More than 500,000 Afghans who fled the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021 have been living without papers in Pakistan, thousands of them waiting for resettlement in the United States and elsewhere.

There are also around 1.45 million Afghan refugees, registered with the U.N. refugee agency, most of whom fled during the 1979-1989 Soviet occupation of their country. Last July, Pakistan extended the stay of refugees registered with UNHCR until June, saying they won’t be arrested or deported at least until the extension expires.

In January, U.S. President Donald Trump paused American refugee programs for at least three months and since then, around 20,000 Afghans who were awaiting resettlement in Pakistan are now in limbo. Afghans waiting for relocation to the United States have also urged Trump to restore the refugee program to end their ordeal.

HRW said in a statement that the human rights situation in Afghanistan has continued to deteriorate since the Taliban takeover in August 2021.

“Women and girls are banned from post primary education and denied a broad range of rights and freedoms. Human rights defenders, journalists, and former government personnel are at particular risk,” the group said.

The statement also said that Afghans returning to their country struggle to survive amid Afghanistan’s soaring unemployment rate, broken health care system and dwindling foreign assistance.

Earlier this year, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had also approved the March 31 deadline for the deportation of those Afghans awaiting relocation to third countries unless their cases are swiftly processed by the governments that have agreed to take them.

“Afghanistan is not safe for any forced refugee returns,” Pearson said, “Countries that pledged to resettle at-risk Afghans should respond to the urgency of the situation in Pakistan and expedite those cases.”

HRW said that Pakistan’s Interior Ministry has also announced that Afghans without official residence documents, along with holders of Afghan Citizen Cards, must leave the cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi or face deportation.

“Afghans holding Proof of Registration (PoR) cards must leave by June 30,” it said.

More than 800,000 Afghans have returned home or have been expelled by force from Pakistan since 2023, according to the International Organization for Migration, a U.N. agency that tracks migration.

More than 70% of those returning to Afghanistan have been women and children, including girls of secondary school age and women who will no longer have access to education, according to HRW.

The group said that “Pakistani police have raided houses, beat and arbitrarily detained people, and confiscated refugee documents, including residence permits. They have demanded bribes to allow Afghans to remain in Pakistan.”

 

Rights group says Pakistan steps up pressure on Afghans to return home where they risk persecution
read more

Pakistan threatens Military action in Afghanistan

Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has claimed that Afghanistan is sheltering terrorists and warned that Pakistan may take action within Afghan territory if needed.

Khawaja Asif, the defense minister of Pakistan, stated in a television interview that the country is ready to conduct military operations within Afghan territory to pursue terrorist groups. This statement comes as tensions between Islamabad and Kabul are escalating over the activities of terrorist groups.

In an interview with Geo News on Wednesday, March 18, Asif claimed that the Taliban supports fighters of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and that if necessary, Pakistan will take action in any country to defend itself.

Asif declared that “the enemy must be pursued wherever they are,” stating that those against cross-border action are going against Pakistan’s national interests.

He criticized those who oppose pursuing terrorists into Afghanistan, calling their stance harmful to Pakistan’s security.

At the same time, Pakistan’s Environment Minister, Musadik Malik, also announced in a television program that the government has decided to carry out extensive operations against terrorists. He added, “We will take the war to the doorsteps of those who martyr Pakistani children.”

So far, the Taliban has not responded to these claims.

Meanwhile, Pakistani military officials have declared in a security meeting that they will no longer allow terrorist groups to use Afghanistan’s soil to launch attacks against Pakistan. General Asim Munir, the chief of the Pakistani army, emphasized the need for a firm policy, asking, “How much more do we have to sacrifice?”

Meanwhile, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, leader of the Pakistan People’s Party, called Afghanistan a “sanctuary for terrorists” and urged the international community to take a firm stance against the Taliban’s support for extremist groups.

This ongoing tension between Pakistan and Afghanistan highlights the growing instability in the region and the need for effective diplomatic and security measures to address the issue of cross-border terrorism. The international community’s response will be crucial in shaping the future of these two countries’ relations and regional security.

Pakistan threatens Military action in Afghanistan
read more

New Academic Year in Afghanistan will begin with schools remaining closed to girls

The Taliban’s Ministry of Education announced that the new academic year in Afghanistan will start on Thursday, March 20, in colder regions. However, there was no mention of reopening girls’ schools beyond grade six. This marks the fourth year in a row that girls will be excluded from attending schools above this grade.

According to a statement released on March 18, 2025, the Taliban’s Minister of Education, Habibullah Agha, and other officials are scheduled to attend the ceremony to mark the beginning of the academic year at Amaniyeh High School in Kabul. However, there has been no mention of girls’ education at higher levels, signaling a continued ban on girls’ schooling beyond grade six.

The ban on girls’ education has sparked widespread domestic and international reactions. Hamid Karzai, the former president of Afghanistan, once again urged the Taliban administration to reopen schools and universities for girls, calling this restriction a major obstacle to the country’s progress.

People’s campaigns, such as “Let’s Read Together,” led by the Women’s Freedom Movement, have also called for the removal of this ban, warning that its continuation will have irreparable consequences for the future of the younger generation. UNESCO also announced in August 2024 that the deprivation of 1.4 million girls from education has destroyed the achievements of two decades of education in Afghanistan.

However, some officials of the Taliban regime have shown a different perspective. Shir Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the former political deputy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in a controversial speech in January 2025 that led to his escape from Afghanistan, stated that the ban on girls’ education has no religious basis and is merely a personal decision by Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada, the leader of the Taliban.

This internal criticism is described as a reflection of divisions within the leadership of the Taliban, but no changes have been made to the official policy so far.

With the start of the new academic year, it will be the fourth year in a row that girls’ schools have been kept closed for higher education. Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021, they have shut down girls’ schools above grade six and banned women from working with NGOs, further curtailing their freedom and opportunities.

The previous government used to mark the beginning of the academic year on the third of March, but the Taliban has now shifted the start to first March, disregarding the traditional Nowruz celebrations. The Taliban claims that they need to ensure “conditions according to their requirements” and adjust the curriculum before reopening schools and universities for girls.

Despite nearly four years in power, the Taliban’s objectives regarding women’s and girls’ education remain unmet. They continue to ignore international reactions, labeling the issue as an “internal matter” of Afghanistan, and refuse to lift the ban on girls’ education. This ongoing situation has led to widespread condemnation from global organizations, yet the Taliban remains resolute in its position.

The continued restrictions on girls’ and women’s access to education in Afghanistan severely limit their opportunities for growth and development. These policies not only violate fundamental human rights but also harm the future of Afghanistan society as a whole.

The international community must continue to exert pressure on the Taliban to reverse these oppressive measures and ensure that girls and women in Afghanistan can access education and contribute to their communities.

New Academic Year in Afghanistan will begin with schools remaining closed to girls
read more

Economy Ministry Urges Global Support for World Health Organization

Two days ago, WHO warned that by June this year, 80% of the health centers it supports in Afghanistan would be shut down due to a lack of funding.

Following the announcement of the suspension of 80% of World Health Organization (WHO) centers in Afghanistan, the Ministry of Economy of the Islamic Emirate has called on world countries to support the organization.

Two days ago, WHO warned that by June this year, 80% of the health centers it supports in Afghanistan would be shut down due to a lack of funding.

Abdul Latif Nazari, the technical deputy minister of economy, stressed the crucial role of WHO in supporting Afghanistan’s health sector, saying: “Our request to the international community and humanitarian organizations is to support this organization so that it can continue providing its services to the Afghan people.”

Doctors in the country have also highlighted the significance of WHO in delivering healthcare services, funding medical staff, and preventing infectious diseases in remote areas. They warned that such a decision could lead to the collapse of the country’s health system.

“Unfortunately, this decision will create many problems for our people, and it will force patients from provinces to travel to central areas, which will cause even greater difficulties,” said Madad Khan Danishwar, a doctor.

“It will have a direct negative impact on our health sector. On one hand, many doctors will become unemployed, and on the other, the number of controllable diseases will rise, ultimately affecting the general public,” said Mujtaba Sufi, another doctor in Kabul.

Meanwhile, in another report, WHO revealed that in February, it provided health services to 171,583 people across 20 provinces of Afghanistan. These services were delivered through 123 health centers.

“These aid efforts must continue. People are not in a good financial condition to buy medicine. They simply cannot afford it,” said Gul Mohammad, a resident of Kabul.

Earlier this week, WHO announced that by March 4, 167 health centers in 25 districts that had been serving 1.6 million people were shut down due to budget shortages.

Additionally, Save the Children has reported that 18 health centers in Afghanistan have recently closed.

Economy Ministry Urges Global Support for World Health Organization
read more

UN Extends UNAMA Mission, Islamic Emirate Calls for Intl Engagement

The UN Security Council, after a month of deliberations, unanimously approved the resolution on UNAMA’s mission extension on Monday.

The Islamic Emirate, following the one-year extension of UNAMA’s mission in the recent UN Security Council meeting, has called on the UN representation in Afghanistan to work towards facilitating the country’s global interactions.

Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate, reiterated this request while also rejecting claims of threats emanating from Afghanistan toward neighboring countries.

He stated: “This representation should pursue its main objective. Instead of creating unnecessary concerns in the country and exploiting minor issues, they should not provide grounds for propaganda against Afghanistan or become a tool of malicious circles.”

The UN Security Council, after a month of deliberations, unanimously approved the resolution on UNAMA’s mission extension on Monday.

The one-year mission will focus on humanitarian conditions, economic matters, international aid, human rights, and fostering engagements.

Fu Cong, China’s permanent representative to the UN, emphasized: “This resolution reaffirms strong commitments to Afghanistan’s sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and national unity. It reflects the Council’s positions, expectations, and concerns regarding Afghanistan’s evolving challenges. The resolution also highlights Afghanistan’s economic difficulties, humanitarian funding shortages, and obstacles to international aid.”

Several UNSC members, including the UK, South Korea, and the US, stressed UNAMA’s focus on human rights in Afghanistan, particularly women’s rights.

The Russian representative emphasized pragmatic engagement and Afghanistan’s reintegration into the international community as key to lasting peace.

Anna Evstigneeva, deputy permanent representative of Russia to the UN, stated: “We are convinced that achieving lasting peace in Afghanistan is impossible without a comprehensive and realistic approach toward its final international reintegration. This approach must be based on objective assessments and patient dialogue with the de facto authorities, including under UN supervision.”

Dorothy Shea, the US representative at the UN, said: “We call on UNAMA to strengthen its efforts to promote Afghans in enjoyment of human rights, particularly for women and girls. We support UNAMA’s work to help address the widespread humanitarian crisis and stabilize the economy.”

Pakistan’s representative, however, once again criticized Afghanistan’s interim government regarding terrorism.

Munir Akram, Pakistan’s permanent representative to the UN, stated: “Apart from the need for adequate humanitarian assistance to destitute Afghans, Pakistan has consistently asserted that the foremost amount the challenges faced in Afghanistan is terrorism within and from Afghanistan. The Taliban government has not been effective in eliminating ISIS, Daesh. It has tolerated several other terrorist groups and is complicit in the cross-border attacks.”

UNAMA’s mission has been extended until March 17, 2026.

UN Extends UNAMA Mission, Islamic Emirate Calls for Intl Engagement
read more

Torkham Crossing Reopens for Freight Traffic After Nearly a Month

On the other hand, several passengers and drivers have expressed happiness over the reopening and called for more facilities at the crossing.

The Torkham crossing has reopened for transit after being closed for nearly a month. Local officials said both sides also agreed to fully reopen the crossing for all types of movement on Friday of this week.

The closure of this crossing not only posed serious challenges for travelers and emergency patients but also inflicted millions of dollars in losses on traders from both sides.

Abdul Jabar Hikmat, the Torkham commissioner, stated: “After several meetings, this route was reopened for freight trucks at 4:00 PM. As the systems at the crossing are down, it will open for passengers and patients on Friday.”

Following the reopening, Mohammad Younus Mohmand, deputy of the chamber of commerce and investment, said: “This route should never be closed. It is a commercial and transit route, and the committee that contributed to reopening the crossing will continue its efforts and provide good recommendations to both governments.”

Meanwhile, traders and investors say the closure of the Torkham crossing caused them millions of dollars in losses. They demand the separation of trade activities from political issues.

Ghulam Mustafa Rahimi, head of the Nangarhar chamber of commerce and investment secretariat, told TOLOnews: “This route should not fall victim to politics. Trade is free worldwide, and ports should not face restrictions.”

Abdul Wali Babakarkhail, deputy of the Nangarhar chamber of commerce and investment, commented on the losses: “Traders from both countries lost more than a million dollars daily. Now that it has been 27 days, imagine how high the total losses are.”

Pakistan closed the Torkham crossing 27 days ago in response to the construction of facilities by Islamic Emirate forces near the disputed hypothetical Durand Line.

On the other hand, several passengers and drivers have expressed happiness over the reopening and called for more facilities at the crossing.

“This route should never be closed; it must always remain open. When it’s blocked, all goods, including fruits and vegetables, spoil on both sides,” said Aminullah, one of the drivers.

This comes after multiple skirmishes occurred between Islamic Emirate forces and Pakistani soldiers following the border closure, which left hundreds of families displaced.

Torkham Crossing Reopens for Freight Traffic After Nearly a Month
read more

Takeaways from AP’s reporting on U.S.-allied Afghan refugees struggling for basic support

By TIFFANY STANLEY
Associated Press

LAUREL, Md. (AP) — Rahmani worked for a U.S.-backed organization in Kabul, which put him at risk of Taliban retribution. Now, the father of two is among thousands of newly arrived refugees who lost financial assistance when the Trump administration cut off funding for the federal refugee program in January.

He moved here in November through the vetted form of legal migration. To fast-track self-sufficiency, it provides refugees with wraparound services for three months — help with housing, food and job placement — while other federal grants support their first five years.

Instead, Rahmani’s relocation services were largely halted after only two months, when the Trump administration upended the refugee program. He otherwise would have qualified for extended rental assistance for up to six months.

He has spent weeks looking for work, with no luck. Unable to pay his rent, his anxiety mounts by the day. Here’s a look at key elements of the plight he and his family face.

Resettlement agencies are reeling from disruption of funding

Rahmani is a client of Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area, a local faith-based resettlement agency that is waiting on $3.7 million in federal funding for work it has already provided.

LSSNCA has struggled to make payroll, and its support services have fallen like dominoes after it was forced to lay off 75 people and furlough seven others.

Two-thirds of its clients are Afghan allies, who were offered visas and protection in the United States after the Taliban returned to power. These Afghans worked alongside U.S. troops or, like Rahmani, were employed by U.S.-backed organizations. Rahmani is identified using only one of his names because he still fears for his family’s safety.

The risk of widespread evictions

By early March, at least 42 households under LSSNCA’s care had received eviction notices, putting nearly 170 people in Virginia and Maryland on the edge of homelessness, with more — like Rahmani’s family — at risk. The staff has been fundraising and negotiating with landlords to stave off evictions.

The organization raised $500,000 in six weeks, but that doesn’t fill the gap left by frozen government funds.

Global Refuge is the parent organization of LSSNCA and has long served as one of 10 national agencies partnering with the federal government to resettle refugees. It has received no federal reimbursements for work done since Inauguration Day and has laid off hundreds of staff. Nearly 6,000 refugees in its care were within 90 days of arrival, the initial aid window, when it received a stop-work order from the Trump administration.

Across resettlement agencies nationwide, support for at least 30,000 recent arrivals was affected. At LSSNCA, 369 people were within their first 90 days in the U.S., and another 850 clients were eligible for longer-term services.

“We’re seeing the de facto wholesale destruction of a longstanding bipartisan program that saved millions of lives,” said Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Global Refuge.

Refugees fled instability, only to find more of it in the U.S.

LSSNCA’s capacity has been stretched thin before. The chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 led to a surge of Afghans being resettled in the U.S.

LSSNCA went from serving 500 people a year to 500 people a month. They staffed up to deal with the influx of Afghans, with case managers working long hours. The quality of their work suffered: Federal reimbursements were often delayed, and they struggled to provide services. The difference then was they knew the federal government backed their work.

Marjila Badakhsh came to the U.S. in December of 2021. A journalist who worked for a U.S.-funded Afghan media organization, she was evacuated from Kabul and resettled in Virginia.

Once a LSSNCA client, she was later hired at the organization, only to be laid off in January when the agency received its stop-work order.

“After three years, with one policy I’m thinking that I’m back to the day that I came to the United States for the first time, and I should start again,” she said.

She stays busy applying to jobs in Virginia and California, where her brother — who worked as an interpreter for the U.S. military in Afghanistan — was recently resettled. But her dreams of one day welcoming their parents and sister to the U.S. are on hold after the suspension of the U.S. refugee program.

Lawsuits against the Trump administration have been filed over its immigration policies, with one judge ruling in favor of three faith-based resettlement agencies. In a recent court filing, administration lawyers argued that initial refugee benefits are “not required by law.” They indicated it would take months to comply with a court order to restart the program.

This week, Global Refuge received some federal reimbursements for its work during the Biden administration. Those funds came through the Department of Health and Human Services. Global Refuge has not received federal payments for work done since late January, and it has not received reimbursements for the 90-day aid offered through the State Department, which did not respond to a request for comment.___

Associated Press writer Gary Fields contributed to this report from Washington.

Stanley is a reporter and editor on The Associated Press’ Global Religion team. She is based in Washington, D.C.

 

Takeaways from AP’s reporting on U.S.-allied Afghan refugees struggling for basic support
read more

Trump’s funding freeze leaves US allied Afghan refugees struggling for the basics

By TIFFANY STANLEY

LAUREL, Md. (AP) — The rent is due, but Rahmani has no money to pay it.

The Afghan father of two worked for a U.S.-backed organization in Kabul, which put him at risk of Taliban retribution. Now he is among thousands of newly arrived refugees who lost financial assistance when the Trump administration cut off funding for the federal refugee program in January.

His family’s monthly rent and utilities total nearly $1,850, an unfathomable amount compared to what he once paid in Kabul.

He has spent weeks looking for work, walking along the suburban highway across from his family’s apartment, inquiring at small markets and big box stores. So far, there are no job leads.

He moved here in November with the federal refugee program, a vetted form of legal migration to the U.S. for those fleeing persecution. To fast-track self-sufficiency, it provides refugees with wraparound services for three months — help with housing, food and job placement — while other federal grants support their first five years.

Instead, Rahmani’s relocation services were largely halted after only two months, when the Trump administration upended the refugee program. He otherwise would have qualified for extended rental assistance for up to six months. Still jobless and unable to make ends meet, his anxiety mounts by the day.

Rahmani is a client of Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area, a local faith-based resettlement agency also in disarray. The organization is waiting on $3.7 million in federal reimbursements for work it has already provided.

LSSNCA has struggled to make payroll, and its support services have fallen like dominoes after it was forced to lay off 75 people and furlough seven others. Nearly a third of its staff is now gone, with its case management team hit the hardest, leaving many refugees without a steady presence as they navigate their new lives.

Two-thirds of its clients are Afghan allies, who were offered visas and protection in the United States after the Taliban returned to power. These Afghans worked alongside U.S. troops or, like Rahmani, were employed by U.S.-backed organizations.

Rahmani worked in information technology in Afghanistan for a large Afghan media organization, which the U.S. helped fund as part of its democracy-building efforts. He is identified using only one of his names because he still fears for his family’s safety.

Sitting in his spartan apartment, he gestured to his daughter, a bright-eyed, dark-haired toddler in Hello Kitty leggings. She just turned 2; a “happy birthday” banner still hangs on the wall.

Rahmani came here for the futures of both his daughter and 7-year-old son. “Because in my own country, girls are not allowed to go to school.”

Now he wonders if coming here was a mistake.

“If they kick me out from the apartment, where should I stay?” he asked. “Should I stay with my family in the road?”

The risk of widespread evictions

Covering the rental assistance promised to new refugees is LSSNCA’s most pressing concern. By early March, at least 42 households under its care had received eviction notices, putting nearly 170 people in Virginia and Maryland on the edge of homelessness, with more — like Rahmani’s family — at risk. The staff has been negotiating with landlords and fundraising to stave off evictions.

“It is like a daily conversation about how much money came in today,” said Kristyn Peck, CEO of LSSNCA. “OK, who’s most at risk of eviction out of all these people? … Whose rent can we pay first? And they’re just kind of impossible choices.”

The organization raised $500,000 in six weeks, but that doesn’t fill the gap left by frozen government funds. LSSNCA had expected President Donald Trump to lower refugee admissions, as he did during his first term, but they didn’t anticipate losing funds for refugees already in the U.S.

The Rev. Rachel Vaagenes, pastor of Capitol Hill Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C., started a GoFundMe for LSSNCA in February and quickly raised $25,000 to cover rent for three families in Maryland for three months.

“It’s a drop in the bucket, right? Even if there were a thousand churches doing this, we still couldn’t do what the U.S. government does,” Vaagenes said. “We cannot make up the gap, no matter how much we want to as individual congregations.”

Global Refuge is the parent organization of LSSNCA and has long served as one of 10 national agencies partnering with the federal government to resettle refugees. The vast majority of Global Refuge’s funding comes from state and federal dollars, which accounted for more than 95% of its 2023 budget. It has received no federal reimbursements for work done since Inauguration Day and has laid off hundreds of staff. Nearly 6,000 refugees in its care were within 90 days of arrival, the initial aid window, when it received a stop-work order from the Trump administration.

Across resettlement agencies nationwide, support for at least 30,000 recent arrivals was affected. At LSSNCA, 369 people were within their first 90 days in the U.S.; 850 more clients were eligible for longer-term services.

“We’re seeing the de facto wholesale destruction of a longstanding bipartisan program that saved millions of lives,” said Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Global Refuge.

Refugees fled instability, only to find more of it in the U.S.

LSSNCA’s capacity has been stretched thin before. The chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 led to a surge of Afghans being resettled in the U.S.

LSSNCA went from serving 500 people a year to 500 a month. They staffed up to deal with the influx of Afghans, with case managers working late into the night. The quality of their work suffered: Federal reimbursements were often delayed, and they struggled to provide services. The difference then was they knew the federal government backed their work.

Marjila Badakhsh came to the U.S. in December of 2021. A journalist who worked for a U.S.-funded Afghan media organization, she was evacuated from Kabul, eventually landing at a military base in New Jersey before LSSNCA took her case and she was resettled in Virginia.

She was later hired at LSSNCA, putting her language skills to use with Afghan clients. Though recently promoted, she was among those laid off in January when the agency received its stop-work order.

“I was thinking that I’m stable at this job, and I’m building my career here,” she said. “But right now, after three years, with one policy I’m thinking that I’m back to the day that I came to the United States for the first time, and I should start again.”

She stays busy applying to jobs in Virginia and California, where her brother — who worked as an interpreter for the U.S. military in Afghanistan — was recently resettled. But her dreams of one day welcoming their parents and sister to the U.S. are on hold after Trump suspended most of the refugee program.

Other LSSNCA clients remain in limbo. Anastasiia De Zoysa fled war-torn Ukraine and received temporary legal status in the U.S. She and her family settled near relatives in Frederick, Maryland, where her husband got a job in his field. But now she worries their status will be revoked.

“I’m willing to go home when it’s safe,” she said, noting her former city is under Russian control. “I have nothing in Ukraine now if I go back.”

The courts are still weighing in

Lawsuits against the Trump administration have been filed over its immigration policies, with one judge ruling in favor of three faith-based resettlement agencies. In a recent court filing, administration lawyers argued that initial refugee benefits are “not required by law.” They indicated it would take months to comply with a court order to restart the program.

This week, Global Refuge received some federal reimbursements for its work during the Biden administration. Those funds came through the Department of Health and Human Services. Global Refuge has not received federal payments for work done since late January, and it has not received reimbursements for the 90-day aid offered through the State Department, which did not respond to a request for comment.

Resettlement can be difficult under any circumstances. Rahmani remembers the first lonely weeks in his new town, when he spotted another Afghan man. He called out to him in Dari, his own language, and cried when they hugged.

He now knows of at least 10 recently arrived Afghan families living nearby, and many are also struggling. With his English skills, he often serves as their translator, helping them at appointments.

More and more, Rahmani thinks he will have to go back to Afghanistan, despite the danger.

“If I don’t have the home rent, then I don’t have any other choice,” he said.

At least if something happened to him in Afghanistan, his relatives would be there to care for his wife and children.

“But in the United States,” he said, “there is nobody who would take care of my family.”

 

Associated Press journalist Gary Fields contributed from Washington.

Stanley is a reporter and editor on The Associated Press’ Global Religion team. She is based in Washington, D.C.

 

Trump’s funding freeze leaves US allied Afghan refugees struggling for the basics
read more

After Trump halted funding for Afghans who helped the US, this group stepped in to help

By REBECCA SANTANA

WASHINGTON (AP) — When Andrew Sullivan thinks of the people his organization has helped resettle in America, one particular story comes to mind: an Afghan man in a wheelchair who was shot through the neck by a member of the Taliban for helping the U.S. during its war in Afghanistan.

“I just think … Could I live with myself if we send that guy back to Afghanistan?” said Sullivan, executive director of No One Left Behind. “And I thankfully don’t have to because he made it to northern Virginia.”

The charitable organization of U.S. military veterans, Afghans who once fled their country and volunteers in the U.S. is stepping in to help Afghans like that man in the wheelchair who are at risk of being stranded overseas. Their efforts come after the Trump administration took steps to hinder Afghans who helped America’s war effort in trying to resettle in the U.S.

President Donald Trump in January suspended programs that buy flights for those refugees and cut off aid to the groups that help them resettle in the U.S. Hundreds who were approved for travel to the U.S. had visas but few ways to get here. If they managed to buy a flight, they had little help when they arrived.

The White House and State Department did not respond to requests for comment.

Meanwhile, the situation for Afghans has become more tenuous in some of the places where many have temporarily settled. Pakistan, having hosted millions of refugees, has in recent years removed Afghans from its country. increased deportations. An agreement that made Albania a waystation for Afghans expires in March, Sullivan said.

Hovering over all of this is the fear that the Trump administration may announce a travel ban that could cut off all access from Afghanistan. In an executive order signed on Inauguration Day, Trump told key Cabinet members to submit a report within 60 days that identifies countries with vetting so poor that it would “warrant a partial or full suspension” of travelers from those countries to the U.S.

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said Monday that the review was ongoing and no list had been finalized.

But groups that work with Afghans are worried.

When funding was suspended, No One Left Behind stepped in. Their goal is to make sure Afghans with State Department visas don’t get stuck overseas. Other organizations — many who got their start helping Afghans during the U.S. military’s chaotic withdrawal from Kabul in 2021 — are doing the same.

To qualify for this visa, Afghans must prove they worked for the U.S. for at least one year. That means tracking down documentation from former supervisors, who were often affiliated with companies no longer in business. They also undergo extensive vetting and medical checks.

“Our view was, OK, we’ve got to act immediately to try and help these people,” said Sullivan. “We’ve been in kind of an all-out sprint.”

It also launched a website where visa holders can share information, giving Sullivan’s group a starting point to figure out where they might live in the U.S.

Sullivan and the organization’s “ambassadors” — Afghans and Iraqis who already have emigrated to the U.S., many through the special immigrant visa program — have gone to Albania and Qatar to help stranded Afghans.

Aqila is one of those ambassadors who went to Albania. The Associated Press is identifying Aqila by her first name because her family in Afghanistan is still at risk.

Aqila said many of the families didn’t know what would happen when they arrived in America. Would they be homeless? Abandoned? One man feared he’d end up alone in the airport parking lot because his contact in America — a long-haul trucker — couldn’t come pick him up. She assured him that someone would be there.

They gave them cards with contact information for attorneys. They printed papers with information about their rights in English, Dari, and Pashto.

No One Left Behind reached out to family members and friends in the U.S. to help with the transition when they landed in America.

Mohammad Saboor, a father of seven children, worked as an electrician and A/C technician with international and U.S. forces for 17 years. Two months ago, he and his family boarded a plane to Albania in anticipation of soon being able to go to America. They landed in California on March 12, exhausted but safe

The next day he and his family explored their new apartment in the Sacramento suburb of Rancho Cordova.

The family picked the suburb in the hope that the large Afghan population in the Sacramento area would help them get settled and find work. He envisions a bright future in America, where his kids can go to school and eventually give back to the country that took his family in. Arriving in the U.S., he said, gave them a “great feeling.”

“I believe that now we can live in a 100% peaceful environment,” he said.

Sullivan said he hopes there will be exceptions for Afghans in the special immigrant visa program if a travel ban is imposed. They’ve been thoroughly vetted, he said, and earned the right to be here.

“These are folks that actually served shoulder-to-shoulder with American troops and diplomats for 20 years,” he said.

Aqila, the Afghan ambassador, said it’s stressful to hear stories of what people went through in Afghanistan. But the reward comes when she sees photos of those who have arrived in America.

“You can see the hope in their eyes,” she said. “It’s nice to be human. It’s nice be kind to each other.”

Santana covers the Department of Homeland Security for The Associated Press. She has extensive experience reporting in such places as Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

After Trump halted funding for Afghans who helped the US, this group stepped in to help
read more