Mirziyoyev: We Will Continue Constructive Approach Toward Afghanistan

Previously, at the first Central Asia–Japan summit, Mirziyoyev also said that Afghanistan remains an important area of engagement.

Uzbekistan’s president has reiterated his country’s commitment to a constructive approach toward Afghanistan.

Shavkat Mirziyoyev, speaking at a ceremony marking the 35th anniversary of Uzbekistan’s independence, said economic diplomacy is one of the priorities of Uzbekistan’s foreign policy and that the country will continue to expand it.

Shavkat Mirziyoyev, President of Uzbekistan, said: “For the first time, our country will chair the Non-Aligned Movement from 2027 to 2029. We will actively advance initiatives aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of this global platform, which brings together more than 120 countries. We will continue our constructive policy toward Afghanistan, our neighboring country.”

Previously, at the first Central Asia–Japan summit, Mirziyoyev also said that Afghanistan remains an important area of engagement.

Mirziyoyev expressed hope that Afghanistan would move toward peace and stability and focus on meaningful development.

Mohammad Aslam Danishmal, a university lecturer, said: “Economically, Afghanistan is a good market for Uzbek products, and its geographic location is also important for Uzbekistan. Therefore, Tashkent is seeking to expand relations with Kabul, which benefits both sides.”

Uzbekistan is among the countries that maintain close ties and good relations with the Islamic Emirate and Afghanistan.

However, Uzbekistan has not yet formally recognized the Islamic Emirate.

Mirziyoyev: We Will Continue Constructive Approach Toward Afghanistan
read more

Mujahid: We Want Wartime Policies to Change and Good Relations With US

In another part of the interview, Mujahid said the Islamic Emirate does not want war in the region.

Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, has told an Indian media outlet that the current government wants wartime policies to change and seeks good relations with the United States.

Mujahid added that the Islamic Emirate wants the US Embassy in Kabul and the Afghan Embassy in Washington to resume operations, and diplomatic relations between the two countries to be normalized.

Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, said: “Afghanistan wants good relations, and we want wartime policies to change. We want the US Embassy to resume operations in Afghanistan, our embassy in Washington to resume its activities, and normal diplomatic relations between the two countries to be restored.”

In another part of the interview, Mujahid said the Islamic Emirate does not want war in the region and will not support one country against another, including Pakistan.

Mujahid said agreements among Islamic countries are not a cause for concern, adding that such agreements are based on countries’ interests and benefit the Islamic world.

Zabihullah Mujahid added: “This does not cause us concern because these countries make agreements based on their own interests. Saudi Arabia’s security is important. Türkiye and Pakistan are also important Islamic countries. If they reach an agreement on an issue, we view it as cooperation among Islamic countries, and overall, it benefits the Islamic world. This does not threaten us because we have no hostility toward any of these countries. As I said earlier, the recent aggression was initiated by Pakistan, but we consider it a local issue. We want this matter to be resolved. None of these countries is our enemy.”

Wahid Faqiri, an international relations analyst, said: “Every government needs to have better relations with neighboring countries as well as other countries. This is the strength of diplomacy. However, disagreements sometimes arise, and countries must also manage those differences.”

Regarding the recognition of the Islamic Emirate, Mujahid said the decision depends on the conditions and interests of each country, adding that Kabul has formal relations with a number of countries in the region.

Mujahid: We Want Wartime Policies to Change and Good Relations With US
read more

US Remained In Afghanistan Rather Than Defeating Terrorism, Says Russian FM

29 August 2026

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has accused the United States of choosing to maintain a military presence in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks rather than focusing on eliminating terrorism.

Speaking to Russia’s RBC television network on Friday, 28 August, Lavrov discussed tensions between Moscow and the West, the latest developments in the war in Ukraine, and the US role in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

According to the Russian foreign minister, after the 11 September attacks the UN Security Council adopted a resolution supporting US military operations in Afghanistan, aimed at combating terrorism and helping Afghans return to normal life.

Referring to the attacks, Lavrov said Russia had sincerely expressed sympathy with the United States. He said President Vladimir Putin was the first foreign leader to contact the US president at the time on 11 September 2001 and offer assistance.

Lavrov said Russia had been prepared to cooperate with the international coalition in combating terrorism in Afghanistan. He added, however, that instead of eliminating the threat, the United States chose to remain in Afghanistan for years.

On 11 September 2001, al-Qaeda carried out attacks on the World Trade Center towers in New York, the Pentagon in Virginia and a field in Pennsylvania.

Nearly 3,000 people, including civilians, firefighters and police officers, were killed in the attacks.

Following the attacks, the United States invaded Afghanistan, where the Taliban regime had provided sanctuary to al-Qaeda leaders, and overthrew the Taliban government.

 

US Remained In Afghanistan Rather Than Defeating Terrorism, Says Russian FM
read more

Afghans Deported from Iran, Pakistan Face Unemployment and Poverty

They say nearly a year after returning, they remain unemployed, with some of their property still in neighboring countries.

Afghans deported from Iran and Pakistan say they are struggling with unemployment and poverty after returning to the country.

They say nearly a year has passed since their return, but they have yet to find employment, while some of their money and property remain in neighboring countries.

Bacha Khan, deported from Pakistan, said: “I lived in Pakistan for 40 years and had a shop there. The Pakistani government forcibly deported us to Afghanistan. Since returning to Afghanistan, I have not received any assistance. I do not have a home, and there is no work.”

Shah Wali Karimi, deported from Iran, said: “I am unemployed, and if there were jobs, I would not need assistance. I have professional skills in construction, but there is no work.”

Meanwhile, the Afghan Red Crescent Society in Herat has distributed cash assistance to 321 families deported from Iran and Pakistan.

Mohammad-ul-Haq Ahadi, head of disaster management at the Afghan Red Crescent Society, said: “This assistance has been provided by the Afghan Red Crescent Society. The assistance is supported by the European Union and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Each family receives 10,500 afghani in cash.”

Twenty-eight-year-old Najibullah Mahmoudi, who was deported from Iran with his family after living there for 14 years, now lives in a rented house in Herat city.

He says there are no jobs, he is struggling with poverty, and this is the first time he has received assistance since returning.

Mahmoudi told TOLOnews: “It has been a year since I returned to the country. They did not give me the money for the house rent, and 100 million tomans of my money remains with the landlord, but he does not respond. There is no work here. I go out in the morning looking for work and return home in the evening. There is no business, and the situation is very difficult.”

According to figures from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organization for Migration, nearly three million Afghan migrants have returned or been deported from Iran and Pakistan over the past year.

Some of these migrants say they left their money and property behind in the two countries and were deported to Afghanistan empty-handed.

Afghans Deported from Iran, Pakistan Face Unemployment and Poverty
read more

Inside Afghanistan’s Secret Schools for Girls

By Elian Peltier

The New York Times

Elian Peltier interviewed more than 50 students, educators, therapists and parents involved with clandestine schools in Afghanistan.

Aug. 28, 2026

Ayesha goes to a secret school six days a week, mainly to keep seeing people outside her home. It’s the only way to avoid total isolation under Taliban rule, she says. It’s the only way to feel alive.

“Without that connection,” she said, “I don’t know what would happen to me.”

Now 18, Ayesha once dreamed of studying psychology at university. The Taliban ended that dream when they banned formal education for girls beyond sixth grade in 2022.

But Ayesha has been defying the Taliban’s rules for years, sitting in a classroom hidden behind the corridors of a primary school. Thousands of such programs operate across the country under the Taliban’s radar.

Clandestine schools were once seen as a stopgap, a way for girls to keep up with their education until the Taliban were gone. But five years after the Taliban’s return to power, nearly 2.5 million Afghan girls have been locked out of secondary school.

They can go to religious schools or study at home with private instruction. But across the country, girls are risking arrest by going to school in secret. Others fail sixth grade on purpose, to remain in their classrooms for as long as possible.

Principals, teachers and parents operate the schools through a clandestine effort, fighting for what they fear may be a lost cause: to save a generation of girls from ignorance. The Taliban’s leaders do not appear willing to rescind the ban, even while some local officials tolerate the secret schools, worried about denying their own daughters an education.

In interviews with more than 50 students, educators, therapists and parents, many said they feared the ban would do permanent damage — to girls and to Afghanistan’s social fabric. All asked to be identified only by their first names, for fear of retaliation.

Even girls who finish their education have few prospects; the Taliban have banned women from most jobs, and opportunities to go abroad are scarce. Reports of suicidal thoughts, self-harm and rates of underage marriage are on the rise, according to teachers and humanitarian organizations.

Nevertheless, some girls refuse to give up their fight for an education.

“We are also part of this society,” Ayesha said. “Just let us be who we want to be.”

The Hidden Passageway

Late one night recently, Ayesha received a text from her friend Zuhal, 17, who said she would not be coming to class the next day. Zuhal’s father had beaten her, saying that there was no point in attending an underground school.

Ayesha recalls crying as she read Zuhal’s message. She has become known among her friends as the one they can confide in, the apprentice therapist. She said she prayed in her bedroom and urged Zuhal to come back. “If you sit at home, it’s finished for you,” Ayesha told her. “Nobody else is going to do anything for you.”

Zuhal returned to school a few days later but said she would be able to come only when her father is away.

Ayesha’s secret classroom is concealed inside an official primary school. The playground is filled with the shouts of younger students, and hundreds of tiny, colorful shoes are lined up at the entrance to the building. But beyond their classrooms, a door leads to a hidden passageway tucked behind a corner, which leads to the secret classroom for older girls.

To avoid detection, the students vary their routes to the school and avoid walking in groups. Still, now and then, the Taliban burst into the school unannounced, as they did one morning in July during Ayesha’s midyear physics exams. The principal locked the students inside, and 14 young women kept scribbling in silence.

The classroom remains undiscovered. On one occasion, when the girls were not at school, the Taliban tore down the artwork on the walls in a common room near the classroom, Ayesha recalled.

There used to be a time, students and a teacher explained, when a Taliban inspection would send them fleeing through the back door, or rushing to the basement where they would lock themselves in the dark and shush those who cried.

As the students moved up to Grade 12, Taliban visits don’t frighten them as much anymore. Many said they feel contempt for the group.

“Are they expecting the country to develop by depriving half of the population of education?” said Palwasha, one of Ayesha’s classmates. “We don’t want anything other than the basic rights Islam gave us.”

Only a tiny fraction of girls in Afghanistan can receive a secondary education through secret schools; even fewer, like Ayesha and Palwasha, study an international curriculum and speak English fluently. Palwasha wants to launch her own clothing brand. Ayesha knows she won’t be able to study psychology at a university in Afghanistan when she graduates, so she counsels her classmates.

This is the extent of Ayesha’s social life, and it will vanish in a few months. There is no secret school after Grade 12.

“Girls, you are here now,” Ayesha recalled their teacher saying as they sat down for their midyear exam. “But at this time next year, you will be at home.”

Computer Science and Duolingo

The Taliban have taken credit for one measure of success in education: Primary school enrollment for girls rose from 78 percent in 2021 to 87 percent in 2024, according to UNESCO and UNICEF. That’s mainly because day-to-day security has improved across Afghanistan since the war ended with the U.S. withdrawal in 2021. Schools that had been closed reopened, and crossing a street to reach a classroom no longer presents a daily danger.

But the overall picture is alarming. Nine out of 10 Afghan children age 10 cannot read an age-appropriate piece of writing, according to UNESCO. Only one in four Afghan women is literate. Girls who want to continue their education sometimes face additional obstacles from their families.

Laila, 21, joined a secret school to study computer science and languages two years ago, more than 500 miles from her home in one of Afghanistan’s most conservative provinces. She said she threatened to kill herself if her family did not let her attend.

On a recent morning, she worked on computer science and Duolingo lessons in a clandestine Grade 11 classroom. In the school’s darkened corridors, students walked silently past colorful presentations on the human body and the solar system. Dozens more studied in the basement library.

Laila and hundreds of other girls take in-person classes by day and online by night with volunteer tutors around the world, from the United States to the Netherlands to Hong Kong, most of them high school students in a global network of peer-to-peer support.

Even two years after enrolling, Laila faces surprise visits from her younger brother, who tells her she has dishonored the family by being “so free.” Her father is more open-minded but fears gossip if a relative or neighbor finds out, Laila said.

Laila now speaks four languages fluently, including English, and is learning Korean. If she can leave the country after graduation, she said she will study graphic design in Canada or South Korea.

“I want to share these opportunities with other girls from my province, but I can’t,” Laila said.

During their first rule, between 1996 and 2001, the Taliban banned both primary and secondary education for girls, arguing that secular schools were contrary to their hard-line vision of Islam. They said it was a temporary measure, until they could establish a more compatible education system, but they never did.

After coming back to power in 2021, they made similar claims about the public school system that expanded during the 20-year U.S. occupation, and still maintain that the ban is temporary.

“We hope that one day girls’ schools will reopen,” the Taliban’s spokesman, Zabiullah Mujahid, said in an interview earlier this year. “This situation also deeply affects many officials of the Islamic Emirate who have daughters,” he added, referring to the name the Taliban have given to Afghanistan.

But five years into their second rule, the temporary ban once again appears permanent.

The ban comes directly from Kandahar, the group’s seat of power in the south and home to its secretive leader, Sheikh Haibatullah Akhundzada. Many Taliban officials privately say it should be lifted, but no one challenges their leader’s order.

In practice, many Taliban turn a blind eye to schools operating in secret. The principal at one secret school, where some girls pay fees if their families are able, said he had enrolled the sons of Taliban intelligence officers for free to maintain a cordial relationship.

They know Laila’s school well: Taliban police and intelligence officers visit weekly to ensure that female students wear their hijabs correctly and don’t mix with boys, who attend the same school legally.

But they can order the school shut at any time. All schools in Afghanistan, even religious schools, which are permitted for older girls, face an array of rules and frequent, sometimes surprise, inspections.

When they see the Taliban approach, the guards at Laila’s school warn the teachers and the principal by walkie-talkies and then sound a distinctive bell to alert the students.

Najib, the school principal, said that when he asked some unfamiliar Taliban officers to show him their ID on a recent visit, one shouted, “My ID is my gun.”

“And my gun is my pen,” Najib said he replied. He cited Quranic verses about the imperative to educate all children, and that seemed to satisfy them.

The Taliban left.

Failing in Order to Succeed

Many younger Afghan girls try to delay as long as possible what Ayesha and Laila are going through.

In December, Somaya, 12, took her sixth-grade final exams but skipped the tests in Dari language, social studies and Quran studies, hoping to fail and repeat her final year.

“I love going to school,” she said. “I simply wanted to stay.”

Weeks later, Somaya’s teacher told her she could come back. There was only room for her in Grade 4, so she sometimes helps teach since she already knows the curriculum.

Fatima, 12, a student at another school, tore up her final sixth-grade tests last year, hoping that her teachers would fail her and let her repeat the grade. But they passed Fatima anyway, she said.

As Fatima spoke softly in her family’s living room in Kabul, her father, Azizullah, wept and left the room.

“I cry when I think about how often she says she wants to be a doctor, and how now it’s all over,” Azizullah said.

But Fatima bounced back. Weeks later, she passed an entrance exam for an underground school.

Tasnim, a primary schoolteacher, said she leaves the farewell parties for her Grade 6 students because she can’t bear seeing them cry. She no longer has an answer when they ask her, “What was this all for?”

When her own daughter, Kowsar, completed sixth grade, Tasnim convinced a colleague to take her into her class so she could repeat by taking the spot of an absent student.

Her daughter’s graduation certificate reads “Successfully promoted to Grade 7.”

“We try to make them happy,” Tasnim said. “But there’s no Grade 7.”

Dreaming of the Taliban

The restrictions on women and girls are the primary reason the world has shunned the Taliban, but they have promoted religious schools, or madrassas, as an alternative. The girls in those schools must wear black coverings from head to toe, and they are allowed to study science and English as well as religious subjects.

Zala, a sixth-grade student, plans to enroll in a religious school after leaving primary school. “At least we still have an opportunity to keep studying,” she said.

Other students say the madrassas are a poor substitute. Classes deemed less important than religious ones — physics, chemistry and mathematics — are merged into one. And girls are not permitted to use the more advanced curriculum for boys.

“These subjects are pushing us ideologically toward the Taliban,” said Zahida, 17, about Islamic studies, religious history and discussions about politics and jihad led by teachers who embrace the Taliban’s hard-line views.

Ezat, Ayesha’s principal, recently turned the school where her classroom is hidden into a madrassa to ease pressure from the Taliban. He said he hopes teachers can keep providing what he described as a “modern education.”

To what extent and for how long, he does not know.

After the Taliban formalized their ban on education in 2022, many teachers were left without jobs. They kept teaching for free, or for smaller salaries at schools that remained open, or in underground classes across the country.

Many say they feel disillusioned.

At a recent staff meeting, employees in a secret school in Kabul talked about how to keep motivating students. “But who is motivating us?” Kamela, one of the teachers, remembered thinking.

“I see the Taliban in my dreams,” she said. “They’re running after us, beating us and closing the school.”

Inside Afghanistan’s Secret Schools for Girls
read more

More Than 6 Million Afghan Migrants Have Returned Home in Three Years, UN-Habitat Says

 

More than 6 million Afghan migrants have returned to Afghanistan over the past three years, and many more continue to return, the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) said on Thursday.

In a post on X, UN-Habitat said the large-scale return of Afghan migrants has increased the need for housing and basic services across the country.

The agency described adequate shelter as the first step toward ensuring a life of dignity for returnees and called for greater support to help communities accommodate the growing number of people returning to Afghanistan.

The statement comes as Afghanistan continues to receive thousands of returning migrants, particularly from neighboring countries, amid ongoing deportations and voluntary returns.

The latest warning follows a separate update from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which said displaced people, returnees and communities affected by natural disasters face an urgent need for safe shelter.

OCHA said humanitarian agencies are facing a severe funding shortfall for shelter assistance. According to the UN agency, the shelter response has received only a small portion of the $160 million requested, leaving a funding gap of $153 million.

The funding shortage has limited the ability of humanitarian organizations to provide emergency shelter, repair damaged homes and support families returning to areas with limited infrastructure.

UN agencies have repeatedly warned that Afghanistan’s humanitarian needs remain among the world’s largest, with millions of people requiring assistance following years of conflict, economic hardship and recurring natural disasters.

More Than 6 Million Afghan Migrants Have Returned Home in Three Years, UN-Habitat Says
read more

Trump Blames Biden for Abbey Gate Attack, Calls Afghanistan Withdrawal a “Catastrophe”

US President Donald Trump has blamed former President Joe Biden for the deadly Abbey Gate bombing during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, calling the 2021 evacuation a “catastrophe” on the fifth anniversary of the attack.

In a statement released by the White House on Wednesday, Trump paid tribute to the 13 US service members killed in the suicide bombing at Kabul airport and sharply criticized Biden’s handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Trump said the US withdrawal left American troops “defenseless” and described Biden’s decision as a “totally botched withdrawal.” He also repeated his claim that the withdrawal allowed the Taliban to free “thousands of terrorists and criminals” held at Bagram Prison.

The bombing took place on Aug. 26, 2021, at Abbey Gate outside Hamid Karzai International Airport during the final days of the US-led evacuation from Afghanistan. The attack was claimed by Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K) and killed 13 US service members and about 170 Afghan civilians, according to US military reviews.

Trump has repeatedly argued that the Biden administration mishandled the withdrawal and made the evacuation more dangerous for US troops and Afghan civilians. His criticism has been a recurring theme since the chaotic end of the US military mission in Afghanistan.

The White House statement comes as the Pentagon is conducting a separate review of the Abbey Gate attack and the final stages of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Biden has previously defended his decision to end the US military mission in Afghanistan, while acknowledging that the evacuation was “messy” and unfolded more quickly than expected. He has also argued that the withdrawal followed an agreement negotiated between the Trump administration and the Taliban in 2020.

Trump Blames Biden for Abbey Gate Attack, Calls Afghanistan Withdrawal a “Catastrophe”
read more

Gloden: We Cannot Avoid Talks With Afghanistan’s Current Authorities

Gloden said he had previously discussed the issue with German officials, who responded positively to a request for assistance in returning convicted Afghans.

Léon Gloden, Luxembourg’s Minister of Home Affairs, says his country cannot avoid talks with the Islamic Emirate over the return of Afghan nationals and is prepared to engage with them to facilitate the deportation of convicted individuals.

In an interview with a Luxembourg newspaper, Gloden said he had previously discussed the issue with German officials, who responded positively to a request for assistance in returning convicted Afghans.

Gloden told Luxemburger Wort: “We cannot afford not to speak with Syria or the Taliban. The Taliban are a regime that does not reflect the values we would wish for. But if we have a convicted violent offender here in Luxembourg who is an Afghan national, then we must be able to return him. And who can you speak to there? The Taliban are there.I also spoke with our German colleagues at the time and asked: If we have an Afghan offender here who has been convicted, would you be prepared to help us return him to Afghanistan? The answer was positive.”

Aziz Maarij, a former diplomat, said: “The Islamic Emirate should make use of these opportunities and develop a plan. It should accept the legitimate conditions of the international community, which are also the demands of the Afghan people, so that Afghanistan can integrate into the international community and expand its relations. This would contribute to Afghanistan’s progress and development in all areas.”

Several European countries largely suspended deportations of Afghans in 2021 but began limited deportations again in 2023. Efforts at the European Union level to establish mechanisms with the Islamic Emirate for the return and readmission of Afghans intensified in 2025.

Most recently, on June 23, 2026, a delegation from the Islamic Emirate met in Brussels with EU officials and representatives of 15 member states to discuss technical cooperation on the return and readmission of Afghan nationals.

Mohammad Jamal Muslim, a migrant rights activist, said: “Unfortunately, the expedient approach of some host countries has caused concern among thousands of people who are struggling to survive. If international organizations and the international community do not speak out about the current situation facing migrants and their forced deportations, which could even put their lives at risk under difficult circumstances, then no place on earth will be safe for migrants.”

Mohammad Khan Mohammadzai, another migrant rights activist, said: “Before deporting Afghan nationals, European countries should coordinate with Afghan authorities, conduct individual assessments, ensure the safety and human rights of migrants, and establish mechanisms to monitor their situation after return.”

On Tuesday, Germany also returned nearly 30 Afghan asylum seekers to Kabul on a charter flight.

Gloden: We Cannot Avoid Talks With Afghanistan’s Current Authorities
read more

Pakistan Says Ready for Government-Level Talks with Islamic Emirate

Zabihullah Mujahid had said that continued tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan were in the interest of neither country.

Pakistan has announced its readiness to hold government-level talks with the Islamic Emirate.

The spokesperson for Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said at a recent news briefing that any bilateral mechanism between the two countries must be accompanied by practical and verifiable measures.

Tahir Hussain Andrabi, spokesperson for Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said: “We remain open for the state-level dialogue, However, the sustainability of any mechanism will depend on tangible and practical measures. For any dialogue to take place, the Taliban must ensure that Afghan soil is not used against Pakistan.”

Earlier, the Islamic Emirate’s spokesperson said that continued tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan were in the interest of neither country. He added that the Islamic Emirate does not want tensions with any country, particularly Pakistan, and is working to restore relations between the two countries to normal.

Jannat Fahim Chakari, a political analyst, said: “The Islamic Emirate has always said that it does not favor tensions with Pakistan. We hope Pakistan will also demonstrate in practice that it does not favor tensions with Afghanistan and believes in dialogue. Tensions between the two countries are indeed in the interest of neither side.”

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s claim that its opponents are using Afghan territory, and what the Islamic Emirate describes as Pakistan’s support and arming of its opponents, have contributed to continued tensions between the two countries.

It remains to be seen how long these tensions will continue.

Pakistan Says Ready for Government-Level Talks with Islamic Emirate
read more

Pentagon claims to have found ‘hidden’ files on final days of the Afghanistan war

Politico

08/26/2026

The claim comes hours before Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is scheduled to participate in a Pentagon ceremony to upgrade the valor awards for service members who served at the Kabul International Airport during the final days of the conflict.

The end of the war — and the final days of the U.S. occupation, when 13 American service members were killed guarding the airport — have been a focal point of Republican criticism of former President Joe Biden’s foreign policy decisions while in office.

GOP lawmakers have accused Biden of too abruptly ending military operations in Afghanistan, endangering American troops and handing over control of the country to the Taliban. Democratic supporters argue Biden’s move brought to an end two decades of open-ended military missions that did little to improve national security.

The White House has labeled the final days of the war “one of the most shameful and heartbreaking moments in our nation’s collective memory.” Pentagon leaders established a new Afghanistan Withdrawal Special Review Panel to examine the decisions leading up to the American exit from Kabul and determine who deserves blame for the U.S. deaths there.

Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, chair of the panel, in April announced plans to upgrade valor awards given to troops serving at the airport in August 2021 to “more accurately reflect the extreme risk” the troops faced, claiming that the Biden administration had “inappropriately downgraded” earlier honors.

Parnell on Wednesday released a video message on social media claiming the ongoing review has uncovered more improprieties by the previous administration, although he did not provide any details.

“The deeper we look, the more there is to look at,” he said in the message. “We are finding things that we did not expect.”.

He added that his team had “recovered highly relevant classified documents, material that should have been disclosed, stashed, and hidden away in safes where they would not be found. And after the team reviewed these documents, it became clear why someone tried to hide them.”

Parnell said that troops who served in Afghanistan “are owed the full picture of how and why those decisions were made, and we’re going to give it to them.” He did not provide any specifics on a timeline for clearer details on the new findings.

Democratic lawmakers have questioned the intentions of the reviews and criticized the slant of Republican-led hearings on Capitol Hill blaming the 20-year war largely on Democratic presidents.

House Republicans in recent years have accused Biden administration officials of ignoring intelligence reports in the days before the fatal terrorist bombing at the airport, a charge that military officials have rebuffed.

Pentagon claims to have found ‘hidden’ files on final days of the Afghanistan war
read more