FM: Islamic Emirate Seeks to Normalize Relations With US

Muttaqi also called on the United States to reconsider its position toward the Islamic Emirate in light of Afghanistan’s current circumstances.

Five years after the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, Kabul says it is willing to open a new chapter in relations with Washington.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, Foreign Minister of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, told Japan’s Kyodo News that Kabul is seeking to normalize relations with the United States and that the two sides can engage on the basis of mutual respect and shared interests.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, Foreign Minister of the Islamic Emirate, said: “We are seeking to normalize relations with the United States. The two sides can engage on the basis of mutual respect and shared interests. Recognition is an issue for the next stage.”

Dawood Shiraz, a political analyst, said: “Establishing relations between the United States and Afghanistan is not impossible, because the United States needs us and needs this land. The United States has lost something, and keeping Afghanistan isolated is harmful to them. Establishing these relations also has particular benefits for us.”

Muttaqi also called on the United States to reconsider its position toward the Islamic Emirate in light of Afghanistan’s current circumstances.

In another part of his remarks, the foreign minister described relations between Afghanistan and Japan as historic and close and called for the resumption of operations at the Afghan Embassy in Tokyo.

Aziz Maarij, an international relations analyst, said: “Japan is a manufacturing and industrial country and has good relations with both the Eastern and Western blocs. It has always provided unconditional assistance to Afghanistan and has had no political agenda or intention to interfere in Afghanistan.”

Regarding relations with Moscow, Muttaqi said that the military and technical cooperation agreement with Russia is intended for the repair and maintenance of Russian-made weapons and is not directed against any particular country.

Akhtar Rasekh, a political analyst, said: “The closer we get to Moscow, the more Western intelligence interference, carried out through Pakistan’s intelligence services, will materialize in Afghanistan, once again exposing Afghanistan to proxy wars driven by the agendas of the West and Pakistan’s ISI.”

Russia is so far the only country to have formally recognized the Islamic Emirate, while Kabul is also seeking to expand engagement with the United States, Japan, and other countries.

FM: Islamic Emirate Seeks to Normalize Relations With US
read more

5 years after withdrawal, a grave picture for Afghans inside and outside the US

The fifth anniversary of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan falls as the nation’s citizens face a starkly different picture than when they first arrived in America, with the Trump administration employing numerous tactics to deport Afghans and halt the arrival of new refugees.

Since President Trump returned to office, he has drastically curtailed the pathways for Afghans to arrive in the U.S., even curbing immigration processing for several countries following a fatal attack on National Guardsmen carried out by an Afghan national.

Under the second Trump administration, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has moved to strip temporary protected status (TPS) for Afghans, ending protections that kept more than 8,000 people from being deported. The administration has also begun the process of reviewing and revoking some special immigrant visas (SIVs) given to Afghans who worked alongside the U.S. in military and government efforts as interpreters, special operations partners and local embassy staff.

And the White House as one of its earliest moves also suspended refugee processing except for white South Africans, cutting off hopes of many Afghans of reaching the U.S.

“As we take stock of whether the U.S. has lived up to its obligations and promises to the Afghans who worked and served alongside American military personnel and partners, often at great personal risk, the answer is a resounding no,” Sharif Aly, president of the International Refugee Assistance Project said on a recent call with reporters.

“The Trump administration has closed virtually all pathways for Afghans to receive visas or enter the U.S., even as there are over 5 million Afghans currently displaced all over the world.”

For Afghans and their advocates — a group that includes many veterans who served in the country — things have gone from bad to worse.

Twenty years of U.S. involvement in the county came to an end over two weeks of chaos at Hamid Karzai International Airport, with throngs of people crowded outside in the hopes of being boarded onto a limited number of flights slated to take allies to safety. More than 80,000 were evacuated through Operation Allies Welcome.

Despite the two decades of nation-building, the Taliban now control the country, and women — who had been free to attend school and pursue careers — are now shut off from most aspects of public life.

And Afghans who did make it to the U.S. live in a precarious state. Even those who gained an SIV or who have a green card have received letters warning them the basis for that status has been revoked.

“Five years ago, this was a crisis. Everything was on fire, nobody had a plan, and the failures were failures of capacity. That is not what this is anymore,” Shawn VanDiver, president and founder of #AfghanEvac, told reporters.

“Today it is not a crisis. It is a deliberate choice, grounded in policy this government has not had the courage to verbalize or brief.”

The Trump administration has shut off virtually every possible pathway for Afghans to reach the U.S. while taking a number of steps to enable deportations of those currently here.

Afghanistan is among the countries on Trump’s travel ban, which bars citizens from a number of countries from getting tourist visas. A second expanded travel ban stripped the narrow exceptions that had allowed for processing of Afghan SIVs, effectively ending the program.

Afghanistan was also on the list of 75 countries for which Trump suspended immigration visas, also cutting off routes for those seeking to join family in the U.S. While a judge last weekend vacated the policy, the State Department on Tuesday paused immigrant visa appointments worldwide to carry out “in-depth training” for consular officers, arguing they need to screen out foreign applicants at risk of taking advantage of U.S. public assistance.

And for those within the U.S., their standing is shakier than ever.

Getting an SIV is a lengthy process, one that requires “chief of mission” approval, in which high-ranking State Department officials sign off on an applicant’s proof of employment. But the Trump administration has been reviewing the basis for those SIVs — a process that began under former President Biden, but which NPR found has been escalating under Trump.

For all those with tenuous statuses, TPS was the protection blocking them from being deported. The Trump administration has ended TPS for 13 out of 17 total countries, with the remaining four set to expire shortly.

“People who went through the steps to secure it really felt like it was a backstop for them,” Joseph Azam, board chair of the Afghan-American Foundation, told The Hill.

“And so, with that being gone, I think people feel like they’re walking a tightrope without a net, and that’s really scary.”

Laila Ayub, co-founder of the Afghan Network for Advocacy and Resources, said she and other immigration attorneys donating their time frequently have to deliver bad news.

“We find ourselves facing difficult conversations every day, explaining to our clients and our friends and family that there is little that we can do as attorneys,” she said on a call with reporters.

“There’s little that we can do when they’re facing, for example, delays with their green cards or asylum, and even less that we can do to help them reunite with their families without action from Congress and others,” she added.

“Every time that there’s a bit of good news — which we’re so grateful for the lawyers who are challenging many of these policies — we end up having a conversation where people in our community think this means that there’s now a pathway back open for their family to come here, and the reality is that that’s still not the case.”

VanDiver this week highlighted the case of one man, a 24-year-old known in court documents as K.Y., applying for asylum where an immigration judge granted them a withholding of removal to Afghanistan, determining he would be likely to face persecution there.

While in the past, such a determination meant someone would not be deported, the Trump administration has taken to removing migrants to third countries. This man is now facing removal to the Central African Republic, where the State Department warns that armed groups control much of the country and conflict breaks out regularly.

Inside Afghanistan, Azam said, people are losing hope, both of fleeing to the U.S. or adjusting to the new reality of life under the Taliban.

It’s been particularly hard for women.

“The people who I hear from that are most distressed and most kind of lacking in hope are still Afghan women,” Azam said, “especially when you know a lot of the public narrative in support of them is waning.”

He called it “a generational setback” as “the path Afghanistan’s on because of this policy is very different than what it was on five years ago where half its population now is erased from public life, erased from education, erased from certain careers, and also erased from the political discourse.”

There are also still many Afghans stuck in limbo across the globe — those who were able to flee to the country but unable to reach the U.S.

Some were ferried out on official flights or other privately arranged charters, while others escaped on their own.

“There are still about 260,000 Afghans stuck in roughly 90 countries — Afghanistan, Pakistan, Qatar and so many more, waiting on a promise the United States made to them,” VanDiver said.

“And many Afghans who did make it here, including the ones our own government put on planes and flew to this country, are being harassed by ICE,” VanDiver continued, referring to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). “That’s the story. Both halves of it. Stuck out there and hunted in here.”

Numerous legislative efforts to aid Afghans in the U.S. and abroad have stalled over the years, including a sweeping effort — the Afghan Adjustment Act — that would provide a pathway to citizenship for all Afghans who arrived under the Biden administration, triggering a fresh round of vetting. It would also smooth processing of Afghans who would qualify as refugees.

Under the Trump administration, the legislative vehicles have narrowed, focusing instead on seeking to protect TPS for Afghans, as well as shore up the SIV program.

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), a veteran who served in Afghanistan, is one of the co-sponsors of a bill that would protect TPS for Afghans through 2029.

“We had a good inflow of refugees from Afghanistan, and then this current administration pretty much shut it off. I think it’s wrong. We have a moral obligation to those we served with in Afghanistan, who served by our side, helping us out. We had a promise, and a promise made should be promises kept, absolutely,” Bacon said on a call with reporters.

He said he believed the bill could advance under a discharge petition to force a vote given that there is some GOP support, but he said that TPS should be a “fallback plan” until Congress could gain support for a bill to give that same population a pathway to citizenship.

“I think that the appropriate, the humanitarian, the merciful, the right policy is to find a pathway towards permanent status and citizenship down the road for people in this category — particularly Afghan TPS — is what we should be trying to do,” he said.

But action to do so seems further away than ever.

“All the work we did, like sleeping on the Capitol steps, all this energy and momentum, and all these different ways we tried to crack this nut for almost five years,” Azam said, “it wasn’t enough then, and it’s really not enough now.”

5 years after withdrawal, a grave picture for Afghans inside and outside the US
read more

Trump administration deports relative of Afghans who helped US military to Central African Republic

DAKAR, Senegal — The United States on Saturday deported dozens of people to the Central African Republic, including an Afghan whose brothers collaborated with the U.S. military, his lawyer and an advocacy group said.

The Afghan man, who is in his early twenties, was granted protection against deportation to Afghanistan by a U.S. judge due to fears of persecution by the Taliban, his lawyer Alma David said.

His family in Afghanistan had received threats from the Taliban because of the work performed by the brothers in support of the U.S. military, according to court documents seen by The Associated Press.

Another one of his brothers was a pilot trained by the U.S. and was killed by the Taliban, she added.

The deportation flight which landed in Central African Republic’s capital Bangui on Saturday, included 12 Afghans and eight Iranians, as well as several people from Nepal and Nicaragua, said Savi Arvey, director of policy, refugee and immigrant rights at Human Rights First.

Under a series of often secret agreements, the Trump administration has deported thousands of people to two dozen countries that aren’t their own as it pushes ahead with its immigration crackdown, advocates say. Immigration lawyers say the practice is being used as a legal loophole to indirectly return some asylum seekers to countries they fled. The flight on Saturday is the second to the Central African Republic since June, which carried two dozen migrants, including an Iranian woman facing persecution in her home country.

Trump administration deports relative of Afghans who helped US military to Central African Republic
read more

ICE deports Afghans and others to Africa, expanding “third country” deportations

Over a 10-day period, the Trump administration sent more than 100 deportees from Afghanistan, Cuba, Nicaragua and other nations to eight countries across Africa, expanding its “third country” deportation campaign, according to internal U.S. government documents obtained by CBS News.

Three Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportation flights, the government documents show, dropped off dozens of men and women expelled from the U.S. in Burundi, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Liberia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone.

None of the deportees were from the countries where they were deported, according to the documents. In addition to Afghans, Cubans and Nicaraguans, the ICE flights over the past week and a half included deportees from Iran, Nepal, Turkey and Venezuela, as well as African detainees who are not from the nations where they were sent.

The federal documents, which have not been previously reported on, offer a window into the Trump administration’s intensifying campaign to use “third country” deportation agreements to banish groups of deportees to far-flung countries where they have no ties.

More than 30 countries across the globe have agreed to receive such deportations from the U.S., including some in Latin America like Costa Rica, Panama and Paraguay. But a growing number of African countries have brokered third-country deportation deals with the Trump administration, including nations like the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan, plagued by armed conflict, political tumult and human rights abuses.

The international agreements have largely been shrouded in secrecy, but it appears some countries, like Ghana and Sierra Leone, have only agreed to accept deportees from other places in Africa. Countries like Eswatini, the Central African Republic and Liberia have received detainees from Latin America, Europe and Asia.

Some of those deported to Africa by the Trump administration have criminal records in addition to immigration violations, including the detainees sent to Eswatini and South Sudan, where officials have imprisoned deportees convicted of violent and serious crimes in the U.S. But many of the deportees sent to other countries lack any criminal histories, beyond entering the U.S. illegally or not having the proper documents to stay in the country.

The latest of three ICE flights to Africa dropped off detainees in Sierra Leone and the Central African Republic, where longstanding armed conflict and Russian mercenaries have made the landlocked country one of the most dangerous in the world. A “Level 4” U.S. State Department advisory warns Americans to avoid traveling there for any reason, given widespread violence and insecurity.

CBS News reached out to the Departments of Homeland Security and State seeking comment on the deportations to Africa.

“If an illegal alien chooses to file a claim in court refusing to go to their home country, we are required by law to find a safe and secure nation for them to go to. If an illegal alien chooses to go home, we will give them a free flight home and a $3,000 check,” DHS said in a statement to CBS News on Sunday. “The choice is theirs.”

A State Department spokesperson said the agency would not comment on “private diplomatic communications with other governments” or the “authenticity or veracity of allegedly leaked documents.”

“Implementing the Trump Administration’s immigration policies is a top priority for the Department of State,” the State Department spokesperson added. “We remain unwavering in our commitment to end illegal and mass immigration and bolster America’s border security.”

Among those deported to the Central African Republic on the most recent flight was an Afghan man whose family helped American forces fight the Taliban and who won legal protection in a U.S. immigration court, according to his lawyer and brother.

Khalil, the 24-year-old Afghan deportee, crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally in 2024, after traveling across Latin America, according to his immigration lawyer. He was held by ICE in custody during his entire time in the U.S. His immigration lawyer said Khalil came to join his brothers, one of whom was brought to the U.S. in 2014 because of his work alongside American military forces while in the Afghan Army. Legal documents indicate another of Khalil’s brothers fought the Taliban as a pilot and was killed during the war.

In August 2025, while detained, Khalil was granted a legal protection, known as “withholding of removal,” by a U.S. immigration judge who found he could face persecution in Afghanistan, legal documents show. He did not get asylum, a more permanent legal protection, because of a Biden-era policy that disqualified asylum-seekers who failed to seek protection in other countries before reaching American soil, according to the documents.

While that protection barred ICE from returning Khalil to Afghanistan, it did not legally prevent his deportation to a third country. And the Trump administration has increasingly sought to deport those who’ve won limited protections in immigration court, like withholding of removal, to third countries.

“The goal is to obliterate the global refugee protection system, and his case should serve as a warning of the unconscionable consequences,” said Alma David, Khalil’s immigration lawyer. CBS News is not disclosing Khalil’s surname due to concerns from his family that he or relatives could be targeted by the Taliban.

Zachary Schmidt, an active-duty Marine colonel who supervised Khalil’s brother during his deployment to Afghanistan, said he’s concerned about Khalil’s safety in the conflict-ridden Central African Republic and the prospect that he could be returned to his homeland. He said he’s seen threats made by Taliban militants against Khalil’s family.

“It is my belief that if Khalil gets sent back to Afghanistan, that he will be killed,”  Schmidt told CBS News, speaking in his personal capacity.

Schmidt, who testified in Khalil’s immigration court case, noted the U.S. made a “deal” with Afghans who agreed to aid the American war effort in Afghanistan.

“The deal is that if you help us, and help rebuild your country, we will look out for you. We’ll help you and your family,” Schmidt said. “We have to keep that promise.”

ICE deports Afghans and others to Africa, expanding “third country” deportations
read more

Mirziyoyev: We Will Continue Constructive Approach Toward Afghanistan

Previously, at the first Central Asia–Japan summit, Mirziyoyev also said that Afghanistan remains an important area of engagement.

Uzbekistan’s president has reiterated his country’s commitment to a constructive approach toward Afghanistan.

Shavkat Mirziyoyev, speaking at a ceremony marking the 35th anniversary of Uzbekistan’s independence, said economic diplomacy is one of the priorities of Uzbekistan’s foreign policy and that the country will continue to expand it.

Shavkat Mirziyoyev, President of Uzbekistan, said: “For the first time, our country will chair the Non-Aligned Movement from 2027 to 2029. We will actively advance initiatives aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of this global platform, which brings together more than 120 countries. We will continue our constructive policy toward Afghanistan, our neighboring country.”

Previously, at the first Central Asia–Japan summit, Mirziyoyev also said that Afghanistan remains an important area of engagement.

Mirziyoyev expressed hope that Afghanistan would move toward peace and stability and focus on meaningful development.

Mohammad Aslam Danishmal, a university lecturer, said: “Economically, Afghanistan is a good market for Uzbek products, and its geographic location is also important for Uzbekistan. Therefore, Tashkent is seeking to expand relations with Kabul, which benefits both sides.”

Uzbekistan is among the countries that maintain close ties and good relations with the Islamic Emirate and Afghanistan.

However, Uzbekistan has not yet formally recognized the Islamic Emirate.

Mirziyoyev: We Will Continue Constructive Approach Toward Afghanistan
read more

Mujahid: We Want Wartime Policies to Change and Good Relations With US

In another part of the interview, Mujahid said the Islamic Emirate does not want war in the region.

Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, has told an Indian media outlet that the current government wants wartime policies to change and seeks good relations with the United States.

Mujahid added that the Islamic Emirate wants the US Embassy in Kabul and the Afghan Embassy in Washington to resume operations, and diplomatic relations between the two countries to be normalized.

Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, said: “Afghanistan wants good relations, and we want wartime policies to change. We want the US Embassy to resume operations in Afghanistan, our embassy in Washington to resume its activities, and normal diplomatic relations between the two countries to be restored.”

In another part of the interview, Mujahid said the Islamic Emirate does not want war in the region and will not support one country against another, including Pakistan.

Mujahid said agreements among Islamic countries are not a cause for concern, adding that such agreements are based on countries’ interests and benefit the Islamic world.

Zabihullah Mujahid added: “This does not cause us concern because these countries make agreements based on their own interests. Saudi Arabia’s security is important. Türkiye and Pakistan are also important Islamic countries. If they reach an agreement on an issue, we view it as cooperation among Islamic countries, and overall, it benefits the Islamic world. This does not threaten us because we have no hostility toward any of these countries. As I said earlier, the recent aggression was initiated by Pakistan, but we consider it a local issue. We want this matter to be resolved. None of these countries is our enemy.”

Wahid Faqiri, an international relations analyst, said: “Every government needs to have better relations with neighboring countries as well as other countries. This is the strength of diplomacy. However, disagreements sometimes arise, and countries must also manage those differences.”

Regarding the recognition of the Islamic Emirate, Mujahid said the decision depends on the conditions and interests of each country, adding that Kabul has formal relations with a number of countries in the region.

Mujahid: We Want Wartime Policies to Change and Good Relations With US
read more

US Remained In Afghanistan Rather Than Defeating Terrorism, Says Russian FM

29 August 2026

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has accused the United States of choosing to maintain a military presence in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks rather than focusing on eliminating terrorism.

Speaking to Russia’s RBC television network on Friday, 28 August, Lavrov discussed tensions between Moscow and the West, the latest developments in the war in Ukraine, and the US role in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

According to the Russian foreign minister, after the 11 September attacks the UN Security Council adopted a resolution supporting US military operations in Afghanistan, aimed at combating terrorism and helping Afghans return to normal life.

Referring to the attacks, Lavrov said Russia had sincerely expressed sympathy with the United States. He said President Vladimir Putin was the first foreign leader to contact the US president at the time on 11 September 2001 and offer assistance.

Lavrov said Russia had been prepared to cooperate with the international coalition in combating terrorism in Afghanistan. He added, however, that instead of eliminating the threat, the United States chose to remain in Afghanistan for years.

On 11 September 2001, al-Qaeda carried out attacks on the World Trade Center towers in New York, the Pentagon in Virginia and a field in Pennsylvania.

Nearly 3,000 people, including civilians, firefighters and police officers, were killed in the attacks.

Following the attacks, the United States invaded Afghanistan, where the Taliban regime had provided sanctuary to al-Qaeda leaders, and overthrew the Taliban government.

 

US Remained In Afghanistan Rather Than Defeating Terrorism, Says Russian FM
read more

Afghans Deported from Iran, Pakistan Face Unemployment and Poverty

They say nearly a year after returning, they remain unemployed, with some of their property still in neighboring countries.

Afghans deported from Iran and Pakistan say they are struggling with unemployment and poverty after returning to the country.

They say nearly a year has passed since their return, but they have yet to find employment, while some of their money and property remain in neighboring countries.

Bacha Khan, deported from Pakistan, said: “I lived in Pakistan for 40 years and had a shop there. The Pakistani government forcibly deported us to Afghanistan. Since returning to Afghanistan, I have not received any assistance. I do not have a home, and there is no work.”

Shah Wali Karimi, deported from Iran, said: “I am unemployed, and if there were jobs, I would not need assistance. I have professional skills in construction, but there is no work.”

Meanwhile, the Afghan Red Crescent Society in Herat has distributed cash assistance to 321 families deported from Iran and Pakistan.

Mohammad-ul-Haq Ahadi, head of disaster management at the Afghan Red Crescent Society, said: “This assistance has been provided by the Afghan Red Crescent Society. The assistance is supported by the European Union and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Each family receives 10,500 afghani in cash.”

Twenty-eight-year-old Najibullah Mahmoudi, who was deported from Iran with his family after living there for 14 years, now lives in a rented house in Herat city.

He says there are no jobs, he is struggling with poverty, and this is the first time he has received assistance since returning.

Mahmoudi told TOLOnews: “It has been a year since I returned to the country. They did not give me the money for the house rent, and 100 million tomans of my money remains with the landlord, but he does not respond. There is no work here. I go out in the morning looking for work and return home in the evening. There is no business, and the situation is very difficult.”

According to figures from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organization for Migration, nearly three million Afghan migrants have returned or been deported from Iran and Pakistan over the past year.

Some of these migrants say they left their money and property behind in the two countries and were deported to Afghanistan empty-handed.

Afghans Deported from Iran, Pakistan Face Unemployment and Poverty
read more

Inside Afghanistan’s Secret Schools for Girls

By Elian Peltier

The New York Times

Elian Peltier interviewed more than 50 students, educators, therapists and parents involved with clandestine schools in Afghanistan.

Aug. 28, 2026

Ayesha goes to a secret school six days a week, mainly to keep seeing people outside her home. It’s the only way to avoid total isolation under Taliban rule, she says. It’s the only way to feel alive.

“Without that connection,” she said, “I don’t know what would happen to me.”

Now 18, Ayesha once dreamed of studying psychology at university. The Taliban ended that dream when they banned formal education for girls beyond sixth grade in 2022.

But Ayesha has been defying the Taliban’s rules for years, sitting in a classroom hidden behind the corridors of a primary school. Thousands of such programs operate across the country under the Taliban’s radar.

Clandestine schools were once seen as a stopgap, a way for girls to keep up with their education until the Taliban were gone. But five years after the Taliban’s return to power, nearly 2.5 million Afghan girls have been locked out of secondary school.

They can go to religious schools or study at home with private instruction. But across the country, girls are risking arrest by going to school in secret. Others fail sixth grade on purpose, to remain in their classrooms for as long as possible.

Principals, teachers and parents operate the schools through a clandestine effort, fighting for what they fear may be a lost cause: to save a generation of girls from ignorance. The Taliban’s leaders do not appear willing to rescind the ban, even while some local officials tolerate the secret schools, worried about denying their own daughters an education.

In interviews with more than 50 students, educators, therapists and parents, many said they feared the ban would do permanent damage — to girls and to Afghanistan’s social fabric. All asked to be identified only by their first names, for fear of retaliation.

Even girls who finish their education have few prospects; the Taliban have banned women from most jobs, and opportunities to go abroad are scarce. Reports of suicidal thoughts, self-harm and rates of underage marriage are on the rise, according to teachers and humanitarian organizations.

Nevertheless, some girls refuse to give up their fight for an education.

“We are also part of this society,” Ayesha said. “Just let us be who we want to be.”

The Hidden Passageway

Late one night recently, Ayesha received a text from her friend Zuhal, 17, who said she would not be coming to class the next day. Zuhal’s father had beaten her, saying that there was no point in attending an underground school.

Ayesha recalls crying as she read Zuhal’s message. She has become known among her friends as the one they can confide in, the apprentice therapist. She said she prayed in her bedroom and urged Zuhal to come back. “If you sit at home, it’s finished for you,” Ayesha told her. “Nobody else is going to do anything for you.”

Zuhal returned to school a few days later but said she would be able to come only when her father is away.

Ayesha’s secret classroom is concealed inside an official primary school. The playground is filled with the shouts of younger students, and hundreds of tiny, colorful shoes are lined up at the entrance to the building. But beyond their classrooms, a door leads to a hidden passageway tucked behind a corner, which leads to the secret classroom for older girls.

To avoid detection, the students vary their routes to the school and avoid walking in groups. Still, now and then, the Taliban burst into the school unannounced, as they did one morning in July during Ayesha’s midyear physics exams. The principal locked the students inside, and 14 young women kept scribbling in silence.

The classroom remains undiscovered. On one occasion, when the girls were not at school, the Taliban tore down the artwork on the walls in a common room near the classroom, Ayesha recalled.

There used to be a time, students and a teacher explained, when a Taliban inspection would send them fleeing through the back door, or rushing to the basement where they would lock themselves in the dark and shush those who cried.

As the students moved up to Grade 12, Taliban visits don’t frighten them as much anymore. Many said they feel contempt for the group.

“Are they expecting the country to develop by depriving half of the population of education?” said Palwasha, one of Ayesha’s classmates. “We don’t want anything other than the basic rights Islam gave us.”

Only a tiny fraction of girls in Afghanistan can receive a secondary education through secret schools; even fewer, like Ayesha and Palwasha, study an international curriculum and speak English fluently. Palwasha wants to launch her own clothing brand. Ayesha knows she won’t be able to study psychology at a university in Afghanistan when she graduates, so she counsels her classmates.

This is the extent of Ayesha’s social life, and it will vanish in a few months. There is no secret school after Grade 12.

“Girls, you are here now,” Ayesha recalled their teacher saying as they sat down for their midyear exam. “But at this time next year, you will be at home.”

Computer Science and Duolingo

The Taliban have taken credit for one measure of success in education: Primary school enrollment for girls rose from 78 percent in 2021 to 87 percent in 2024, according to UNESCO and UNICEF. That’s mainly because day-to-day security has improved across Afghanistan since the war ended with the U.S. withdrawal in 2021. Schools that had been closed reopened, and crossing a street to reach a classroom no longer presents a daily danger.

But the overall picture is alarming. Nine out of 10 Afghan children age 10 cannot read an age-appropriate piece of writing, according to UNESCO. Only one in four Afghan women is literate. Girls who want to continue their education sometimes face additional obstacles from their families.

Laila, 21, joined a secret school to study computer science and languages two years ago, more than 500 miles from her home in one of Afghanistan’s most conservative provinces. She said she threatened to kill herself if her family did not let her attend.

On a recent morning, she worked on computer science and Duolingo lessons in a clandestine Grade 11 classroom. In the school’s darkened corridors, students walked silently past colorful presentations on the human body and the solar system. Dozens more studied in the basement library.

Laila and hundreds of other girls take in-person classes by day and online by night with volunteer tutors around the world, from the United States to the Netherlands to Hong Kong, most of them high school students in a global network of peer-to-peer support.

Even two years after enrolling, Laila faces surprise visits from her younger brother, who tells her she has dishonored the family by being “so free.” Her father is more open-minded but fears gossip if a relative or neighbor finds out, Laila said.

Laila now speaks four languages fluently, including English, and is learning Korean. If she can leave the country after graduation, she said she will study graphic design in Canada or South Korea.

“I want to share these opportunities with other girls from my province, but I can’t,” Laila said.

During their first rule, between 1996 and 2001, the Taliban banned both primary and secondary education for girls, arguing that secular schools were contrary to their hard-line vision of Islam. They said it was a temporary measure, until they could establish a more compatible education system, but they never did.

After coming back to power in 2021, they made similar claims about the public school system that expanded during the 20-year U.S. occupation, and still maintain that the ban is temporary.

“We hope that one day girls’ schools will reopen,” the Taliban’s spokesman, Zabiullah Mujahid, said in an interview earlier this year. “This situation also deeply affects many officials of the Islamic Emirate who have daughters,” he added, referring to the name the Taliban have given to Afghanistan.

But five years into their second rule, the temporary ban once again appears permanent.

The ban comes directly from Kandahar, the group’s seat of power in the south and home to its secretive leader, Sheikh Haibatullah Akhundzada. Many Taliban officials privately say it should be lifted, but no one challenges their leader’s order.

In practice, many Taliban turn a blind eye to schools operating in secret. The principal at one secret school, where some girls pay fees if their families are able, said he had enrolled the sons of Taliban intelligence officers for free to maintain a cordial relationship.

They know Laila’s school well: Taliban police and intelligence officers visit weekly to ensure that female students wear their hijabs correctly and don’t mix with boys, who attend the same school legally.

But they can order the school shut at any time. All schools in Afghanistan, even religious schools, which are permitted for older girls, face an array of rules and frequent, sometimes surprise, inspections.

When they see the Taliban approach, the guards at Laila’s school warn the teachers and the principal by walkie-talkies and then sound a distinctive bell to alert the students.

Najib, the school principal, said that when he asked some unfamiliar Taliban officers to show him their ID on a recent visit, one shouted, “My ID is my gun.”

“And my gun is my pen,” Najib said he replied. He cited Quranic verses about the imperative to educate all children, and that seemed to satisfy them.

The Taliban left.

Failing in Order to Succeed

Many younger Afghan girls try to delay as long as possible what Ayesha and Laila are going through.

In December, Somaya, 12, took her sixth-grade final exams but skipped the tests in Dari language, social studies and Quran studies, hoping to fail and repeat her final year.

“I love going to school,” she said. “I simply wanted to stay.”

Weeks later, Somaya’s teacher told her she could come back. There was only room for her in Grade 4, so she sometimes helps teach since she already knows the curriculum.

Fatima, 12, a student at another school, tore up her final sixth-grade tests last year, hoping that her teachers would fail her and let her repeat the grade. But they passed Fatima anyway, she said.

As Fatima spoke softly in her family’s living room in Kabul, her father, Azizullah, wept and left the room.

“I cry when I think about how often she says she wants to be a doctor, and how now it’s all over,” Azizullah said.

But Fatima bounced back. Weeks later, she passed an entrance exam for an underground school.

Tasnim, a primary schoolteacher, said she leaves the farewell parties for her Grade 6 students because she can’t bear seeing them cry. She no longer has an answer when they ask her, “What was this all for?”

When her own daughter, Kowsar, completed sixth grade, Tasnim convinced a colleague to take her into her class so she could repeat by taking the spot of an absent student.

Her daughter’s graduation certificate reads “Successfully promoted to Grade 7.”

“We try to make them happy,” Tasnim said. “But there’s no Grade 7.”

Dreaming of the Taliban

The restrictions on women and girls are the primary reason the world has shunned the Taliban, but they have promoted religious schools, or madrassas, as an alternative. The girls in those schools must wear black coverings from head to toe, and they are allowed to study science and English as well as religious subjects.

Zala, a sixth-grade student, plans to enroll in a religious school after leaving primary school. “At least we still have an opportunity to keep studying,” she said.

Other students say the madrassas are a poor substitute. Classes deemed less important than religious ones — physics, chemistry and mathematics — are merged into one. And girls are not permitted to use the more advanced curriculum for boys.

“These subjects are pushing us ideologically toward the Taliban,” said Zahida, 17, about Islamic studies, religious history and discussions about politics and jihad led by teachers who embrace the Taliban’s hard-line views.

Ezat, Ayesha’s principal, recently turned the school where her classroom is hidden into a madrassa to ease pressure from the Taliban. He said he hopes teachers can keep providing what he described as a “modern education.”

To what extent and for how long, he does not know.

After the Taliban formalized their ban on education in 2022, many teachers were left without jobs. They kept teaching for free, or for smaller salaries at schools that remained open, or in underground classes across the country.

Many say they feel disillusioned.

At a recent staff meeting, employees in a secret school in Kabul talked about how to keep motivating students. “But who is motivating us?” Kamela, one of the teachers, remembered thinking.

“I see the Taliban in my dreams,” she said. “They’re running after us, beating us and closing the school.”

Inside Afghanistan’s Secret Schools for Girls
read more

More Than 6 Million Afghan Migrants Have Returned Home in Three Years, UN-Habitat Says

 

More than 6 million Afghan migrants have returned to Afghanistan over the past three years, and many more continue to return, the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) said on Thursday.

In a post on X, UN-Habitat said the large-scale return of Afghan migrants has increased the need for housing and basic services across the country.

The agency described adequate shelter as the first step toward ensuring a life of dignity for returnees and called for greater support to help communities accommodate the growing number of people returning to Afghanistan.

The statement comes as Afghanistan continues to receive thousands of returning migrants, particularly from neighboring countries, amid ongoing deportations and voluntary returns.

The latest warning follows a separate update from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which said displaced people, returnees and communities affected by natural disasters face an urgent need for safe shelter.

OCHA said humanitarian agencies are facing a severe funding shortfall for shelter assistance. According to the UN agency, the shelter response has received only a small portion of the $160 million requested, leaving a funding gap of $153 million.

The funding shortage has limited the ability of humanitarian organizations to provide emergency shelter, repair damaged homes and support families returning to areas with limited infrastructure.

UN agencies have repeatedly warned that Afghanistan’s humanitarian needs remain among the world’s largest, with millions of people requiring assistance following years of conflict, economic hardship and recurring natural disasters.

More Than 6 Million Afghan Migrants Have Returned Home in Three Years, UN-Habitat Says
read more