The ministry stated that this meeting also addressed the challenges Afghan migrants face in Pakistan and Iran.
The acting minister of refugees and repatriations, Mawlawi Abdul Kabir, discussed the holding of a trilateral meeting between Kabul, Tehran, and Islamabad with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees for Afghanistan (UNHCR).
The ministry stated that this meeting also addressed the challenges Afghan migrants face in Pakistan and Iran.
Mawlawi Abdul Kabir, in separate meetings with Ahmed Suliman, acting head of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) in Afghanistan, and Mihyung Park, IOM Afghanistan Chief of Mission, stressed that a permanent solution to Afghan migration issues requires time and broad international support.
Officials from both the Red Cross and the International Organization for Migration reiterated their support for Afghan migrants.
Abdulmutalib Haqqani, spokesperson for the Ministry of Refugees, said: “The Minister, referring to the mistreatment of Afghan migrants in neighboring countries, stated that a lasting solution to their challenges requires UN support.”
Thousands of Afghan families who fled to Pakistan due to insecurity, poverty, or political restrictions are now facing the risk of arrest and forced deportation.
Some Afghan migrants in Pakistan shared their experiences:
“The Pakistani government is not willing to give even one more day of extension to undocumented Afghans,” said Atiqullah Mansoor.
“The situation for migrants in Pakistan is worsening day by day, and many problems have arisen for them,” said Shabana Mansoor.
Meanwhile, the deputy minister for finance and administration of the Ministry of Refugees visited the temporary migrant camp in Torkham township. Simultaneously, the head of border police evaluated the hypothetical Durand Line and assessed the operations at the Torkham commissary.
Abedullah Farooqi, the media officer of the border police, said: “The border police chief emphasized providing facilities for Afghan migrants in all aspects during this trip.”
A day earlier, Abdul Latif Mansoor, the acting minister of energy and water called the forced deportation of Afghan migrants from Pakistan an injustice.
In a debate with TOLOnews, Mansoor criticized Pakistan’s approach, stating that Afghans have lived and invested in Pakistan for years and should not be expelled in such a manner.
Kabir: Resolving Migration Crisis Requires Time, Global Support
The governor of Parwan said that there exist no types of discrimination among the officials of the Islamic Emirate.
Mohammad Siddiq Mokhles, the intelligence chief of Parwan province, in a public gathering accused political opponents of the Islamic Emirate who reside in neighboring countries of receiving aid from foreign states.
In this gathering, Mokhles stated that these groups also misuse some youth within the country against the Islamic Emirate.
The gathering aimed at addressing the challenges of residents in Sayd Khel district of Parwan province.
“You must be aware of history and the political situation. The people who have gone from the country to Iran and Tajikistan, sometimes go to Pakistan and at times even seek help from Israel,” The intelligence chief said.
The governor of Parwan said that there exist no types of discrimination in Afghanistan and among the officials of the Islamic Emirate.
Mohammad Idris Anwari said “There is no ethnic, linguistic, or regional discrimination among your officials. Rather, your officials consider such biases and preferential attitudes as a major deviation.”
Meanwhile, some residents of Sayd Khel district—located near Charikar, the center of Parwan—say that with the destruction of their agricultural lands due to flooding from the Panjshir, Salang, and Ghorband rivers, as well as the lack of electricity and damaged roads, they are facing serious problems.
They called on officials to address these issues.
Nasir Ahmad Mohabbat, a resident of Sayd Khel district, said: “A survey has been done but it is not enough, because from Gulbahar to the end of Sayad, these people are under the threat of flooding from two rivers.”
Mir Rafiullah Munib, another resident of Sayd Khel district, said: “Projects that remain incomplete—whether in education, roads, or electricity—I hope the governor will make more efforts to complete these projects.”
Local officials in Parwan have also added that many public meetings have been organized across various areas of the province to discuss and resolve residents’ challenges.
Parwan Intelligence Chief: Opponents Seek Help from Foreign States
Military cargo plane from Doha was reportedly carrying CIA deputy chief
A US military cargo plane that flew into Afghanistan last week has sparked speculation that America could retake control of the strategic Bagram air base.
According to local media reports, the C-17 aircraft took off from Doha’s Al Udeid military base, arrived in Afghanistan via Pakistan on Sunday, and landed at Bagram.
The aircraft was said to be carrying senior US intelligence officials, including CIA deputy chief Michael Ellis, and military equipment, Khaama Press reported.
The outlet claimed the Taliban had handed over the base, which president Donald Trump expressed interest in reclaiming during his presidential election campaign, to the US.
The claim was swiftly denied by the Taliban’s chief spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid, who described it as “propaganda”. He said the Taliban had complete control of the air base.
An American takeover of the base was “impossible”, Mr Mujahid said, and “there is no need for any country’s military presence in Afghanistan at present and the Islamic Emirate will not allow such an action”.
Zia Ahmad Takal, a deputy spokesperson at Afghanistan’s foreign ministry, issued a denial as well. “This news is not correct,” he told The Independent.
The Pentagon is yet to comment on the reports, but a US defence source told The Independent that “there is no US military presence in Afghanistan”.
The Bagram air base, north of the capital Kabul, served as the command node for American and allied Nato forces for two decades as they waged a war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
The base, the size of a small city, was captured by the Taliban soon after Western troops vacated it, shutting off power and slipping away as they withdrew from the country, in the summer of 2021.
Bagram has two runways and over 100 parking spots for fighter jets known as revetments because of the blast walls which protect each aircraft. One of the runways, built in 2006, measures 12,000ft long.
It also boasts a passenger lounge, a 50-bed hospital and hangar-sized tents filled with supplies like furniture.
Mr Trump has repeatedly talked about taking back control of the Bagram base. He claimed last month that Washington planned to return to the base because it now allegedly hosted Chinese troops.
“I am the one who got our military presence to under 5,000 but we were going to keep Bagram, not because of Afghanistan but because of China, because the air base is exactly one hour from where China makes its nuclear missiles,” Mr Trump said. “So, we were going to keep Bagram.”
Bagram was one of the largest air bases in the world, complete with “one of the biggest and most powerful runways”, the US president added. “And we gave it up. And you know who is occupying it at the moment? China. Because Biden gave it up. So, we are going to keep that.”
At the time, Mr Mujahid dismissed Mr Trump’s comments as “emotional” and said US officials should “refrain” from making “statements based on unsubstantiated information”.
Mysterious US military flight to Afghanistan sparks speculation about Bagram air base
Huddled on Afghanistan’s chaotic border with Pakistan, his young son shivering in the cold, Ibrahim Danish stared at the unmoving metal gates – willing them to open, even just for a moment.
“We spent the night there in the middle of the street with little Daniel and it was [the most] difficult night of my life,” he says.
“Without food, water and blankets we stood until morning in the middle of thousands of people … but they did not allow anyone in and we come back again to Kabul.”
Since the fall of Kabul and the descent of Afghanistan back into Taliban rule, there have been many dark days. The passage of nearly half a decade has dimmed neither the fear nor the threat.
Mohammed Ibrahim Danish, now in hiding with his wife, Amina, and two children, Daniel and Helene, is a target of the Taliban because he worked on behalf of the Australian government.
‘An honour’: Mohammed Ibrahim Danish describes his work for Australia – audio
Between 2011 and 2015 in republican Afghanistan, he was employed by the international NGO Save the Children on a program known as Children of Uruzgan. It was funded by Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
The program built and ran schools for children in one of Afghanistan’s poorest provinces, aiming to establish 50 kindergartens across a part of the country where six in 10 children never set foot inside a classroom. It taught girls to read and vaccinated children who never visited a hospital. The program trained dozens of doctors in neonatal care in the country with the highest infant mortality rate in the world.
In the middle of it all was Ibrahim, quietly travelling from village to village, translating for Australian aid workers as they spoke with village elders, delivering vaccines to doctors, distributing cash to rural women.
Ibrahim was proud of his work and the difference it was making in the forgotten corners of Afghanistan: “Working on those projects was an honour for me to serve my country and also help the Australian government …
‘If you want us to die, we need to know’: hundreds of thousands of Afghans are waiting for visas to Australia – and time is running out
Read more
“But later my connection with the Australian government and work experience with Save the Children became a danger for me and my family’s life. Because the Taliban think we are infidels and need to be killed because we worked and helped foreigners.”
That Ibrahim’s work on behalf of Australia has made him a target has been recognised by the Australian government. He has been granted locally engaged employee (Lee) certification – a formal recognition for those who worked with and for Australia “and are at risk of harm as a result of their work”.
International hopes for a reformed Taliban, that their desire for international legitimacy would restrain the most grotesque of their tendencies – their silencing of women, their brutality towards minorities – were short-lived. The Taliban were unrepentant, unreformed
Those who had served the former administration and the western infidels who had backed it, or those who were members of ethnic minorities like the Hazara, were cowed back into the shadows.
Ibrahim – both – was forced to flee.
Outside his work Ibrahim had used his burgeoning multimedia skills to film short videos of life in the mountainous villages of his home province, posting them online as a celebration of Hazara music, art and culture. But the footage shows music and poetry performances, women playing sport and with their faces uncovered: further antagonising the fundamentalist Taliban.
In the long years since, he and his family have led a precarious, peripatetic existence, skipping from his home province to remote mountain villages to the capital, Kabul, and back and forth over the country’s dangerous borderlands.
“Taliban visited my house … and asked my neighbours, ‘Where are your infidel neighbours? We have to find them, we must arrest them because they are infidels.’ And my neighbours told [them] that I ran away and they don’t know where I escaped to.”
Ibrahim hoped Kabul’s size might offer protection. But even there were Taliban who knew his history. “We had to change our location every day and week so they could not find us,” he says.
Patrols prowled the streets, stopped people and demanded documents. Gunmen followed others to their homes. Dozens crowded into tiny, dark apartments, too frightened to go out.
“Everywhere was Taliban … I will never forget those difficult days we spent hungry and thirsty with a lot of fear there because Taliban were searching for us and we were not able to even go to a shop to purchase food.”
‘With food, water and blankets we stand until morning in the middle of thousands of people’ – audio
Ibrahim and his family set out on foot for Torkham, the mountainous border crossing into Pakistan. But after their cold and difficult night at the closed frontier they were forced to turn back.
In Kabul, each day brought news of more arrests of those who’d worked for international agencies or served foreign governments. Sometimes they were seized from street corners. More commonly people – sometimes whole families – simply disappeared.
The net grew tighter. Ibrahim feared not only for his family’s safety but also for anyone who’d sheltered them, assisted them, even fed them.
“Again, I tried to go to Pakistan and this time I spent two days and one night on the border due to rush of the people. We slept the night on the streets under the rain and cold weather.
“Daniel, my son, was three years old at that time. He was very sick and had a very high fever. I was not sure that he could get better and I was afraid for him. I was very worried because … four or five children died in front of my eyes on the border.”
This time they made it across. Pakistan was a sanctuary of sorts. The Taliban’s reach was weaker, though not extinguished. But among thousands of Afghan immigrants, Ibrahim and his family were at the mercy of unscrupulous landlords who exploited their lack of connections and temporary documents. When their visas expired, they were expelled back into Afghanistan.
Since then, the unhappy dance has continued. Sometimes every few days, Ibrahim and his family will pick up and leave, careful not to compromise anybody with information about where they might be headed.
Occasionally, too rarely, they get a few weeks of quiet, of relative stability. But always with the knowledge it could end without warning – with a flash of recognition on a street corner, a suspicion insufficiently appeased.
Guardian Australia is not revealing where – not even which country – the family are now sheltering.
‘Delays, double handling’
Trying to get to Australia is a two-step process. The first, obtaining Lee certification, is a reflection, the government says, of “Australia’s view of its moral obligation to current and former employees who have provided valuable support to Australia’s efforts in Afghanistan”.
Alone, it counts for little – it’s not much more than another compromising document should it fall into Taliban hands.
The second step is applying for and securing a visa to Australia. (A Lee program review found the two-step process “causes delays, double handling and confusion, and imposes an administrative burden on applicants”. It heard numerous Lee candidates had been “left behind” in danger in Afghanistan.)
Ibrahim’s Lee certification means the family’s application for humanitarian visas will be prioritised – a recognition that it is their connection to Australia that has brought them into danger.
But there are barriers still. Ibrahim’s application for a humanitarian visa has sat with the Department of Home Affairs since 2022.
‘If the Taliban find us they will kill us’ – audio
Stranded in Afghanistan, Ibrahim has found himself caught in a bizarre catch-22. The Australian government told him it could not progress his visa application from within Afghanistan but, at the same time, advised him not to leave the country.
A letter from Dfat told him: “due to the closure of panel doctors in Afghanistan, we are currently unable to invite applicants to undertake medicals if located in Afghanistan.
“The department is unable to assist clients to travel outside of Afghanistan, and do not advise travel due to safety concerns.”
‘Serious mess’
Ibrahim has a web of support that stretches around the world. He has letters of recommendation from former colleagues as far afield as Singapore and the US.
From Australia, he has offers of housing and community support, even employment.
Government figures provided to Guardian Australia show that to the end of January 2,427 Afghans have been Lee certified: 674 by Dfat, 1,741 by the defence department and 12 by Australian federal police.
Barely a third of them have reached Australia – 817 have travelled to Australia on class XB visas (with 2,368 immediate family members), while 82 have been granted visas (with 321 family members) and 116 applications for humanitarian visas are before the Department of Home Affairs.
“The former Liberal government failed to adequately plan for the evacuation of Afghan LEE and former ministers, including Peter Dutton, oversaw a program plagued by inconsistent and irregular decision making and poor communication with applicants,” said a spokesperson for the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong.
Since Wong took office in 2022, more than 500 applicants have been certified under Dfat’s program –including Ibrahim Danish – more than all previous foreign ministers combined.
“The Albanese government is focused on cleaning up the serious mess left by the Morrison government and we remain committed to doing what we can to assist those who helped Australia’s mission in Afghanistan.”
Ibrahim is planning the next move with his family. The plan is uncertain, contingent on what is possible, on the squeeze-and-release of the Taliban’s capricious rule.
He is keeping his children warm through a bitter winter with the hope that spring may bring better news.
“I would like to come to Australia,” he says quietly, “because I and my family will be safe from being arrested and killed by the Taliban.”
Fleeing Taliban fighters, Ibrahim begs the country he helped – Australia – to save his family
CAIRO (AP) — The Trump administration has reversed sweeping cuts in emergency food aid to several nations but maintained them in Afghanistan and Yemen, two of the world’s poorest and most war-ravaged countries, officials said Wednesday.
The United States had initially cut funding for projects in more than a dozen countries, part of a dramatic reduction of foreign aid led by billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. Aid officials warned the cuts would deny food to millions of people and end health programs for women and children.
The administration informed the World Food Program of its reversal on Tuesday, according to two U.N. officials. Two officials with the U.S. Agency for International Development confirmed that Jeremy Lewin, the Musk associate overseeing the dismantling of USAID, ordered the reversal of some of his weekend contract terminations after The Associated Press reported them. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief media.
The WFP said Monday it had been notified that USAID was cutting funding to the U.N. agency’s emergency food program in 14 countries.
Funding has been restored for programs in Somalia, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Ecuador, according to the USAID officials and one of the U.N. officials. The status of funding for six other unidentified countries was not immediately clear.
Cuts could still be disastrous
The USAID officials said Lewin sent a note internally expressing regret at what he described as a miscommunication. One of the U.N. officials said the decision to restore funding came after intense behind-the-scenes lobbying of members of Congress by senior U.N. officials.
U.S. officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce acknowledged on Tuesday that some of the programs had been cut by mistake and said funding had been restored, without providing details.
“I don’t know how much they know about the system they are dismantling. I don’t know how much they care,” said Nathaniel Raymond, executive director of the Humanitarian Research Lab at the Yale School of Public Health.
“The damage they’ve already done is a potential extinction-level event for two generations of transformational improvements in how we prevent people from dying from a lack of food,” Raymond added.
The cuts could prove disastrous for millions in Afghanistan and Yemen, reeling from decades of war and U.S.-led campaigns against militants.
The U.S. had been the largest funder of the WFP, providing $4.5 billion of the $9.8 billion in donations to the world’s largest food aid provider last year. Previous administrations had viewed such aid as a way of alleviating conflict and combating poverty and extremism while curbing migration.
The Trump administration has accused USAID of advancing liberal causes, and has criticized foreign aid more broadly as a waste of resources.
Afghanistan is scarred by decades of war
More than half of Afghanistan’s population — some 23 million people — need humanitarian assistance. It’s a crisis caused by decades of conflict — including the 20-year U.S. war with the Taliban — as well as entrenched poverty and climate shocks.
Last year, the United States provided 43% of all international humanitarian funding to Afghanistan.
Some $560 million in humanitarian aid has been cut, including for emergency food assistance, treatment of malnourished babies, medical care, safe drinking water and mental health treatment for survivors of sexual and physical violence, according to an assessment by current and former USAID officials and partner organizations. The figure has not been confirmed by the U.S. government.
A separate WFP assessment obtained by the AP showed that food assistance to 2 million people in Afghanistan would be terminated later this year. More than 650,000 malnourished children, mothers and pregnant women would would lose nutritional support.
The United Nations Population Fund said the U.S. had cut $100 million in support for maternal health services for millions of women, as well as gender-based violence services.
The International Rescue Committee said the cuts would affect nearly 1 million people. Its programs include nutritional assistance for tens of thousands of children under 5, as well as counseling services.
“Kids who have seen great violence, who benefit from social work and psychosocial care that we provide, will be cut off,” said Bob Kitchen, head of global emergencies for the aid group.
Some in Yemen have been at risk of famine
The poorest Arab country was plunged into civil war in 2014 when Iranian-backed Houthi rebels seized much of the north, including the capital, Sanaa. The U.S. supported a Saudi-led coalition that intervened the following year on behalf of the government. The conflict has been at a stalemate in recent years.
The war has led to widespread hunger, and experts warned as recently as 2024 that parts of Yemen were at risk of famine.
The U.S. cuts would end life-saving food assistance to 2.4 million people and halt nutritional care for 100,000 children, according to the WFP assessment.
The WFP had already suspended its programs in Houthi-ruled northern Yemen, where the rebels have detained dozens of U.N. staffers as well as people associated with aid groups, civil society and the now-shuttered U.S. Embassy.
The latest cuts would affect southern Yemen, where the internationally recognized government opposed to the Houthis is based. The WFP assessment warned that halting aid there “carries significant political and security implications and risks deepening the economic crisis and exacerbating instability.”
Last year, the WFP assisted 8.6 million people in Yemen, more than a quarter of its population, including more than 330,000 internally displaced people and 1.2 million with disabilities. Half were women and children.
Kitchen with the IRC said water, sanitation and health support for nearly 2 million people would end, and that while his group and others are seeking alternative sources of funding, there is no real substitute.
“I am fearful that we are going to turn around in months to come and just see the numbers of people who are perishing because there’s just not enough funding to keep them alive anymore,” he said.
Butt reported from Islamabad and Knickmeyer from Washington. Associated Press writers Matthew Lee in Washington, Sam Mednick in Tel Aviv, Israel, and Sarah El Deeb in Beirut contributed to this report.
US restores urgent food aid but not in Afghanistan and Yemen, where millions need it
Bagram Airbase has reportedly been handed over to the U.S., amidst conflicting claims. Trump blames Biden for allowing China’s influence, while the Taliban denies the transfer.
The Bagram Airbase, a strategic military site in Afghanistan, has become the center of conflicting reports regarding its control. The U.S. President Donald Trump recently stated that the airbase, which was handed over to the United States, is now effectively under Chinese control due to President Biden’s decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
Trump, in a speech at the Republican National Committee on Tuesday, April 8, criticized Biden’s handling of the U.S. military exit from Afghanistan. He argued that Biden’s actions left the airbase vulnerable, allowing China to occupy it. Trump further remarked that had he been president, he would have ensured the U.S. maintained control over Bagram, not just because of Afghanistan’s strategic importance, but due to its proximity to China’s nuclear facilities. According to Trump, the failure to keep Bagram resulted in what he called “the worst disaster in American history,” and the loss of the airbase now gives China a significant advantage in the region.
Meanwhile, reports suggest that Bagram Airbase was handed over to the United States by the Taliban, with U.S. military aircraft, including C-17 planes, landing at the site and bringing military vehicles, equipment, and senior intelligence officials. The arrival of the Deputy Chief of the CIA was also reported, emphasizing the importance of Bagram for U.S. intelligence operations in the region.
However, the Taliban has categorically denied these claims. Zabihullah Mujahid, the spokesperson for the Taliban, dismissed the reports of a U.S. military presence at Bagram as “propaganda.” In a recent statement, Mujahid reiterated the Taliban’s stance that Afghanistan’s sovereignty will not be compromised and that the country would not allow any foreign military presence, including that of the U.S. He emphasized that there was no need for such foreign intervention, rejecting the rumors circulating on social media and in various media outlets.
According to Mujahid, such reports are misleading and serve only to confuse the public. He reaffirmed the Taliban’s position on the matter, claiming that the handover of Bagram to the U.S. is “impossible.”
In a broader context, the strategic significance of Bagram has been widely acknowledged. The base, once a hub for U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, offers vital access to the region and is located within close proximity to China’s key military sites. This makes the airbase a critical asset in terms of intelligence gathering and military strategy, raising questions about its future use.
Despite these contradictory reports, the fact remains that Bagram’s control and future direction have major geopolitical implications. The U.S., China, and the Taliban are all stakeholders with significant interests in the base, each framing the situation in a way that aligns with their strategic goals.
The tensions surrounding Bagram also highlight the ongoing struggles over control and influence in Afghanistan, particularly in the aftermath of the U.S. withdrawal. While the Taliban maintains that Bagram is under their control, reports of ongoing U.S. military activities in the area continue to raise doubts about the true nature of the situation.
As these developments unfold, the future of Bagram Airbase will likely play a pivotal role in shaping Afghanistan’s sovereignty, regional security, and broader global power dynamics. Serving as a symbol of U.S. presence in the region, Bagram’s control is now at the center of intense geopolitical debate. With the situation remaining fluid, it is uncertain whether the base will be fully utilized by the U.S., China, or the Taliban, each of whom have strategic interests in its future. The outcome will significantly impact not only Afghanistan but also the broader security architecture of the region.
IS Bagram Airbase now under US or Chinese Control?
Over 11,000 Afghan migrants have been expelled from Pakistan in the latest phase, while PoR cardholders are protected until June 30.
Pakistani media reports have revealed that, since the beginning of the second phase of forced Afghan migrant expulsions, 11,371 Afghan migrants were deported from the country between April 1 to April 9. This includes both voluntary and involuntary returns.
According to official reports from Pakistan’s immigration department, published by the Express Tribune newspaper, 2,242 migrants voluntarily approached the deportation camps in the Landi Kotal area. The majority of these deportations occurred through the Torkham border crossing into Afghanistan.
Additionally, the Express Tribune report highlights that 1,427 Afghan migrants were arrested in various cities across Pakistan and transferred to the Torkham border for deportation during the same period.
At the Torkham Camp, officials report that the Taliban administration has made necessary arrangements for the returning migrants. A 12-member special committee is providing 24/7 services to the returnees, offering assistance in areas like food, healthcare, transportation, telecommunications, and documentation services.
Meanwhile, court rulings in Peshawar have prohibited law enforcement agencies from taking legal action against Afghan migrants holding PoR cards (Proof of Registration). According to this order, PoR cardholders are allowed to stay in Pakistan until June 30 this year without the threat of arrest or deportation.
The ongoing expulsion of Afghan migrants has raised several questions about the treatment of refugees in the region. While the voluntary return process provides a pathway for those wishing to leave, many are concerned about the safety and security of the returnees as they cross into Afghanistan.
As the situation develops, international organizations and human rights groups have called for more humane treatment of Afghan migrants, urging Pakistan to ensure that deportations are conducted within international legal frameworks and that returnees are given adequate support for their reintegration.
Over 11,000 Afghan Refugees expelled from Pakistan; PoR cardholders protected until June 30
Pakistan has suspended the detention and deportation of registered Afghan migrants until further notice.
Reports from local media outlets in Pakistan reveal that the Peshawar city court has prohibited all law enforcement agencies from taking legal action against Afghan migrants who hold PoR (Proof of Registration) cards. This decision ensures that Afghan migrants with PoR cards can remain in Pakistan until June 30 of this year, enjoying immunity from detention and deportation during this period.
The ruling comes amid a broader crackdown by the Pakistani government on undocumented migrants, particularly focusing on the expulsion of those without proper documentation. The second phase of the deportation process began last week, raising widespread concerns among Afghan refugees in Pakistan.
The human rights organization has called on the Pakistani government to halt the expulsion of Afghan refugees immediately. In a statement posted on social media platform X, the organization emphasized that Pakistan should take corrective measures in accordance with international human rights laws.
Pakistan has been hosting millions of Afghan refugees, many of whom fled to the country due to ongoing conflict and insecurity in Afghanistan. PoR cardholders are registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and are legally allowed to stay in Pakistan.
However, in recent years, political and security pressures have led to increasing calls for the expulsion of undocumented migrants, creating a tense atmosphere for Afghan refugees. This decision by the court offers temporary relief for PoR cardholders, who can continue their lives in Pakistan without fear of immediate deportation.
Despite the court’s ruling, the Pakistani government is under intense pressure, both domestically and internationally, to address the growing issue of undocumented migrants. The situation has prompted various human rights groups to voice concerns over the potential violation of international refugee protection laws.
Some observers have noted that while the court’s order provides temporary protection to PoR cardholders, it does not resolve the long-term uncertainty faced by Afghan refugees. There is growing concern that further actions may be taken against migrants once the immunity period expires.
As the deadline of June 30 approaches, the future of Afghan migrants in Pakistan remains uncertain. The situation could evolve, with the Pakistani government potentially facing difficult choices on how to handle the ongoing refugee crisis.
For now, Afghan refugees with PoR cards can breathe a sigh of relief, but the looming question remains: will Pakistan continue to protect these refugees beyond the end of June, or will the pressure to expel them increase?
This decision underscores the fragile status of Afghan refugees in Pakistan, where political instability and security concerns continue to affect the lives of millions. The international community will likely continue to monitor the situation closely.
Meanwhile, the ruling provides immediate relief to PoR cardholders, it is only a temporary measure. The broader issue of refugee protection in Pakistan requires a long-term solution that respects international human rights standards and addresses the underlying political and security challenges facing both Afghan migrants and Pakistan.
Pakistan halts detention and deportation of registered Afghan migrants until further notice
They are calling on both the Iranian and Afghan governments to address their situation seriously.
A number of Afghan refugees in Iran have complained about growing challenges, saying the Iranian government has invalidated their refugee census cards.
They are calling on both the Iranian and Afghan governments to address their situation seriously. According to them, arrests of Afghan refugees in Iran continue.
Marufa Eshaqi, an Afghan refugee in Iran, said: “The Iranian government had previously issued census cards to Afghan refugees, which could be used in schools, hospitals, and elsewhere to avoid harassment. Now, the government has declared these cards invalid.”
Another refugee, Safar Barez, said: “Refugees who have lived peacefully in Iran for years are now facing increasing difficulties imposed by both the government and the public. Life has become very hard for them.”
On the other hand, Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi, during a meeting with Alireza Bikdeli, acting ambassador to Afghanistan, said agreements between Tehran and Kabul, especially those facilitating the gradual return of Afghan refugees, must be followed up.
The Iranian embassy in Kabul cited Araghchi: “The Foreign Minister emphasized the importance of bilateral ties between the two Muslim and neighboring countries and the need to implement agreements, particularly on enabling the dignified return of Afghan nationals and supporting Afghanistan’s reconstruction.”
Migrant rights activist Nazar Nazari said: “Iran must continue its historic role as a host country. It should work constructively with Afghan refugees and establish a joint mechanism for cooperation.”
Previously, the Iranian foreign ministry had also mentioned developing a joint plan with the Islamic Emirate to facilitate the gradual and dignified return of Afghan migrants.
Afghan Refugees in Iran: Census Cards Declared Invalid
Afghan refugees in Pakistan are reportedly facing abuse and property looting during forced expulsions, according to officials’ statements.
The Ministry of Refugees and Repatriations of Afghanistan has condemned the ongoing detention and forced deportation of Afghan migrants from Pakistan. According to the ministry, these migrants are subjected to violence and their belongings are seized by Pakistanis during their forced return.
The ministry’s statement, issued on Tuesday, April 8, accuses Pakistan of mistreating migrants and violating international migration laws. It has called for an immediate cessation of violent actions against Afghan refugees and urged Pakistan to respect the rights of migrants.
Reports indicate that Afghan migrants are being unlawfully detained in Pakistan, with their homes, shops, and markets being raided. They are subsequently transferred to prisons and forced to return to Afghanistan. The ministry has denounced this process, stating that it involves violence, looting, and the seizure of property, which violates Islamic, humanitarian, and international laws.
Furthermore, the statement calls on the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to end the mistreatment of migrants and to refrain from using them for political purposes. It has also urged both Pakistan and Iran to treat migrants according to good-neighborliness, Islamic values, and international law, ensuring their dignity and rights are upheld.
In addition, the Ministry of Refugees and Repatriations has announced that it has started preparations for the forced return of migrants. However, the ministry stressed that the mistreatment by neighboring countries is unacceptable, and that migrants should be allowed to bring their belongings back with them.
A special meeting was held, chaired by Mullah Mohammad Hassan Akhund, to discuss the mistreatment of migrants and the forced deportations from Pakistan. The meeting, which included key officials, condemned these actions as un-Islamic and inhumane. Participants urged the people, political parties, and influential figures in Pakistan to take responsibility and called on the United Nations and international organizations to take necessary measures to prevent a humanitarian crisis and ensure the dignified return of migrants.
Afghan Refugees’ property looted and expelled with abuse in Pakistan: Officials