What We Know About the Munich Car Attack

At least 36 people were injured when an Afghan asylum seeker drove a car into a union march. The police said the driver confessed.

On Thursday morning, a 24-year-old Afghan refugee drove into a union demonstration in central Munich, injuring nearly 40 people. The police say they are investigating whether the driver, who confessed to a deliberate attack, acted alone. The attack happened just 10 days before federal elections that have been focused on migration, and the crash could loom large in the campaign’s final days.

At around 10:30 a.m. Thursday, officers in a police cruiser at the tail end of a union march in central Munich noticed a two-door Mini Cooper coming up from behind. The car sped up to pass the cruiser and plowed into the back of the marchers. Witnesses said they heard the Mini rev up as it drove into the crowd. The police fired a single shot as they went to arrest the driver.

Ambulances and a helicopter arrived at the scene. Police set up a temporary post in a nearby restaurant, where they asked witnesses to come forward, and set up an online portal for uploading any video or pictures of the attack. Officers also used dogs to search the car.

On Friday, the police said that 36 people had been injured, including several children. A 12-year-old girl, who was severely injured, was still in intensive care.

The car plowed into a crowd of union members and supporters and their families. Verdi, one of the biggest unions in Germany, had called a one-day strike for some public sector workers, including those employed in day care, garbage collection and city administration.

The roughly 1,500 marchers were being accompanied by police officers as they walked down a public street.

The office was investigating him on the suspicion of 36 counts of both attempted homicide and of causing dangerous bodily harm. After the driver confessed to the attack, the authorities said they believed he had religious motives and an “Islamist orientation.”

Investigators said they found a message on his cellphone in which he had said goodbye to a loved one, saying “I might not be around tomorrow.”

However, investigators, still combing through his digital devices, said they had not found a connection with the Islamic State or other terrorist organizations.

This is at least the fifth major random attack by a Middle Eastern or Afghan migrant in the last nine months. In late May, an Afghan migrant killed a police officer and wounded several participants in a far-right demonstration in Mannheim. In August, a Syrian refugee killed three and injured eight in a stabbing spree in Solingen. In December, a man from Saudi Arabia used an S.U.V. to kill six people and injure 300 by driving into a Christmas market in Magdeburg. Last month, an Afghan refugee with an apparent mental illness used a kitchen knife to kill a toddler and a man who had rushed in to help in a city park in a small town in Bavaria.

These attacks have helped increase the popularity of the far-right Alternative for Germany party, known as the AfD, which has made limiting migration one of its key planks. Last month, Friedrich Merz, who leads the conservative Christian Democrats and is expected to be Germany’s next chancellor, broke a taboo by voting in Parliament with the AfD on migration measures. While he was criticized by hundred thousands of protesters who took to the streets soon after, his vote showed how much the issue of limiting immigration has become mainstream, even though the number of those seeking asylum has been dropping.

The German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, said on Thursday that the attacker should be punished and sent back to Afghanistan.

Christopher F. Schuetze is a reporter for The Times based in Berlin, covering politics, society and culture in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

What We Know About the Munich Car Attack
read more

How pause in US foreign aid is impacting South, Central Asia

In Kabul, Afghanistan, a major midwifery program — girls’ only higher education option — has closed.

Across Pakistan, dozens of development programs have ground to a halt.

In Bangladesh, a health research center has laid off more than 1,000 employees.

The fallout comes two weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration suspended foreign aid amid a widespread review, leaving thousands of development programs in limbo.

“I’m in shock,” said a student at the USAID-funded midwifery school in Kabul, speaking anonymously. “This was the last remaining option for girls to receive an education and get a job.”

“People keep calling and asking, ‘When is the program going to restart?'” said the head of a USAID-backed education nonprofit in Afghanistan, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The freeze follows a Jan. 20 executive order issued by Trump that suspended all foreign aid pending a 30-day review.

The president said the review was necessary because “the United States foreign aid industry and bureaucracy are not aligned with American interests, and in many cases, antithetical to American values.” The executive order said the current setup “serves to destabilize world peace by promoting ideas in foreign countries” that undermine “harmonious” international relations.

Now, U.S. government agencies involved in delivering foreign assistance must decide by April 30 to keep, change or end their foreign aid programs.

U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by country.
U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by country.

The aid suspension marks a sharp break with decades of U.S. foreign policy. Historically, the U.S. has been the world’s biggest foreign aid donor, with $68 billion in aid in 2023.

The offices of USAID, the lead foreign aid agency, remain closed. Although the State Department has issued a broad exemption to “lifesaving” humanitarian programs such as emergency food distribution in Afghanistan, most programs on the ground remain closed.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has taken over as acting head of USAID, said that while he backs foreign assistance, “every dollar” spent on foreign assistance must advance U.S. national interest.

“We are not walking away from foreign aid,” Rubio told Scott Jennings on Sirius XM Patriot 125 on Monday. “We are walking away from foreign aid that’s dumb, that’s stupid, that wastes American taxpayer money.”

USAID is recognized globally as a premier development agency, but critics at home and abroad have long accused it of throwing American taxpayer money into wasteful projects.

To highlight this, the White House last week issued a list of USAID programs involving “waste and abuse,” including $1.5 million “to advance diversity, equity and inclusion” in Serbia; $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia; and $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt.

Foreign aid defenders acknowledge the waste, but they argue these projects represent a fraction of the $68 billion U.S. aid program.

U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by sector.
U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by sector.

South Asia

Though U.S. aid to South and Central Asian nations has declined recently, the region still gets billions annually, with Afghanistan the largest regional recipient.

The country, which received $1.3 billion in 2023, now faces a wave of program shutdowns. While emergency humanitarian aid continues after a brief interruption, development programs from child and maternal health to education have stopped.

The impact has been wide-ranging. The United Nations Population Fund has frozen all U.S.-backed programs in Afghanistan, potentially leaving more than 9 million people cut off from health services, according to regional director, Pio Smith.

The UNFPA, which Republicans have long accused of promoting coercive family planning practices, relies on U.S. assistance for almost a third of its humanitarian operations. The agency, which denies the charge, is likely to lose all that support, impacting its work across the region.

Education is another casualty of the aid suspension in Afghanistan. The American University of Afghanistan, established in 2006 with a USAID grant and now operating out of Qatar, has reportedly suspended classes. A university spokesperson could not be reached for comment.

Meanwhile in Bangladesh, the Asian University for Women is scrambling to keep hundreds of Afghan students after U.S. funding dried up. To cover the funding shortfall, the university has launched a $7 million appeal.

“We cannot and will not send these students back to an uncertain and oppressive future,” the university said in a statement.

Bangladesh, despite its $437 billion economy, is also feeling the pinch. The country is a U.S. ally and South Asia’s largest recipient of U.S. aid after Afghanistan, with more than $500 million supporting a wide range of programs from emergency food assistance to fighting tuberculosis and pandemic influenza.

In Pakistan, more than three dozen USAID-funded projects have reportedly shut down in recent days. A burns and plastic surgery center in the northwestern city of Peshawar, built with a $15 million USAID grant, faces an uncertain future.

“At the moment, I don’t know what’s going to happen to the whole program, but I’m hopeful that the program will move forward,” Dr. Tahmeedullah, the center’s director, said in an interview.

Central Asia

In Central Asia, where five former Soviet republics received about $235 million in 2023, nearly every USAID-funded program and initiative has been stopped, according to local news reports.

“From what I’ve gathered, all types of programs and initiatives have been suspended as of now,” said Alisher Khamidov, a Kyrgyzstan-based consultant who follows USAID projects in the region.

The suspensions include critical health initiatives such as USAID’s $18 million-$20 million “TB-Free” programs in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, both launched in 2023.

“This five-year project has special significance for Uzbekistan as it was one of the few projects tackling TB in the country,” Khamidov said in an interview last week with VOA.

In a statement, a State Department spokesperson said, “We are reviewing all foreign assistance programs to ensure they are efficient and consistent with U.S. foreign policy under the America First agenda.”

USAID has poured billions of dollars into many regional development programs since the early 1990s, including initiatives to promote democratization and civil society. Those efforts, however, represent a fraction of the total aid. Today, the agency is largely focused on agriculture and health projects, according to Khamidov.

Across the region, USAID programs have long faced allegations of waste and abuse, with numerous examples uncovered by the agency’s own inspector general.

Nowhere has the alleged abuse been starker than in Afghanistan, where the Taliban have been accused of siphoning of millions of dollars in U.S. aid funneled through U.N. agencies.

Some Taliban opponents have welcomed the aid freeze, arguing that it could force the group to accede to international demands. Others, such as former Afghan Vice President Amrullah Saleh, say it could level the political playing field in the country.

“The dismantling of USAID clears the path for the rise of genuine leaders in Afghanistan,” Saleh wrote on X.

Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, says a multibillion-dollar program can inevitably lead to waste and abuse. He told VOA that foreign aid can showcase U.S. goodwill but also cause diplomatic friction over policy and cultural issues.

Clark said that though the aid pause should have been less abrupt, a thorough review of the program is necessary.

“It makes sense to stop as a new administration comes in and reassess where the money is going, where it’s being allocated,” he said.

VOA’s Afghan, Deewa and Urdu services and correspondent Vero Balderas contributed to this report.

How pause in US foreign aid is impacting South, Central Asia
read more

‘Please don’t do this’: Afghan families in Pakistan caught in crackdown

By

Al Jazeera

Islamabad, Pakistan – When Salima Ahmad* noticed a three-day gap between the expiry of her family’s visas and the date on a document proving that they had applied for renewals, her heart filled with dread. An Afghan citizen living in Pakistan since 2022, Ahmad feared that authorities would arrest her family for residing in the country illegally.

On February 7, just two days after their visas expired, her fears became reality.

A group of police officials, including female officers, raided her rented house, identifying her family as undocumented residents. Despite her pleas and attempts to show that their passports had been sent for visa renewal, the police took her husband away.

“I kept imploring, pleading for his release. I tried to show them my documentation and proof that we had applied for visa renewal, but they didn’t listen,” Ahmad told Al Jazeera.

The policewomen then told Ahmad to pack up her children’s belongings, warning that she would also be taken to a camp for refugees and deportees set up on Islamabad’s outskirts.

Advertisement

“I begged them not to do this. My children would be traumatised. But they eventually put us in a van and took us away,” she said.

After spending two days in a tent at the camp situated in Islamabad’s outskirts, Ahmad only managed to return home two days later by arranging a 60,000-rupee ($216) bribe.

“I had to ask my relatives, who came to check on us, to arrange this loan. Only then were we allowed to go home,” she said. For now, the family has passports back, with visas stamped for one more month, at the end of which Salima fears a repeat of the humiliating and scary experience they endured in early February.

Ahmad’s story is one of many, as thousands of Afghan citizens in Pakistan, many of whom fled following the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in August 2021, now face an uncertain future under a recent government notification.

In a two-page document issued by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s office last month, the Pakistani government outlined a three-phase plan to send back Afghan citizens living in the country.

The first phase involves the “immediate” deportation of all undocumented Afghan citizens. This includes 800,000 Afghans who did not enter the country on valid visas but who, since 2017, have been granted Afghan Citizen Cards (ACC) by the government of Pakistan itself.

The second phase focuses on Afghan citizens who hold so-called Proof of Registration or PoR cards, first issued in 2006. The final phase will target Afghan citizens who might relocate to third countries.

Advertisement

If the plan is carried out as envisaged, only valid visa holders will remain in the country – none of the other refugees who entered Pakistan under duress without proper documentation will be allowed to stay.

The notification in effect escalates a previously stop-start approach to expelling Afghan refugees. Originally implemented in late 2023, the plan has already led to more than 800,000 Afghan nationals returning to Afghanistan over the past 18 months, according to the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR).

History of hosting refugees

Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghan refugees since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Over the next 20 years, as civil war engulfed Afghanistan and the Taliban first took control in 1996, successive waves of refugees arrived in Pakistan.

After the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 following the 9/11 attacks, the Taliban’s fall led to the establishment of a civilian government, prompting thousands of Afghans to return home.

Ahmad, who first moved to Pakistan as a seven-year-old in 1997, was among those who resettled in Kabul in 2010. After the family moved, she completed a business degree and started working for Afghanistan’s Ministry of Finance under President Ashraf Ghani.

“I was happily living in Afghanistan at the time. My mother and two sisters relocated to the United States around 2019, but I was comfortable in Kabul,” she said.

However, the Taliban’s stunning return to power in August 2021 triggered another wave of displacement, with between 600,000 and 800,000 Afghans seeking refuge in Pakistan.

Advertisement

Pakistan currently hosts nearly more than 2.5 million Afghans, according to government estimates. Among them, about 1.3 million possess a UNHCR-issued Proof of Registration (PoR) card, first introduced in 2006, while another 800,000 hold an ACC, issued in 2017. All of them, until now, held documents that for all purposes were deemed as certificates of legitimate residence in Pakistan. Now they face an uncertain future under the three-stage “relocation” plan.

Those who arrived after the August 2021 Taliban takeover have had to rely on visa renewals to remain in Pakistan, a process that is expensive, unpredictable and fraught with delays.

While the official visa renewal fee is $20, Ahmad says submitting passports through legal channels often results in prolonged confiscation or outright rejection, putting applicants at risk of detention. So they pay visa agents to expedite the process.

“We have to pay anywhere between 15,000 and 20,000 rupees ($54 to $72) to renew our visas. It used to be valid for six months, but since January this year, the government has only been granting one-month visas,” she lamented.

Strained relations and growing crackdowns

Once considered one of the Afghan Taliban’s closest allies, Pakistan has seen relations with its neighbour deteriorate over the past three years.

Islamabad blames Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers for failing to curb the activities of the Pakistani Taliban, or Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a group that emerged in 2007 and has since carried out hundreds of attacks against Pakistani security forces.

Advertisement

In 2024 alone, Pakistan has witnessed more than 500 attacks, resulting in more than 1,500 deaths among civilians and law enforcement personnel.

The Pakistani government has frequently accused Afghan citizens of involvement in these attacks and claims Kabul provides shelter to TTP, a charge the Afghan Taliban denies.

But the government’s recent notification suggests that Afghan refugees now find themselves in the middle of these bilateral tensions.

Afghan citizens holding PoR cards until now have enjoyed some rights, such as the ability to open bank accounts and the chance to register in Pakistan’s citizen database. Now, suddenly, they’re outsiders, and in the queue for expulsion.

In July 2023, following a visit by UNHCR chief Filippo Grandi, Pakistan extended PoR card validity until June 30, 2025. The latest government notification suggests that there is no plan, as of now, to extend their stay any further.

Ikramullah Jamil*, a 31-year-old Afghan citizen born in Pakistan, has lived there nearly all his life, except for six years between 2015 and 2021, when he relocated to Afghanistan with his family.

Jamil and his family had to move out after the Pakistani military launched a major military offensive in the country’s northwestern province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where they used to live.

But after the fall of Kabul, Jamil, the eldest among his eight siblings, chose to return to Pakistan.

“Because of my language skills and connections, I’ve been able to support our Afghan community since 2021. But now, with the government’s vague policies, I fear I could also be at risk of deportation,” Jamil told Al Jazeera.

Advertisement

Even the UNHCR isn’t entirely clear about Pakistan’s plans, said Qaiser Afridi, the spokesperson for the UN agency in Pakistan.

“We are constantly in touch with them [the government] to explain what exactly the plan is, but we have not been given a clear answer,” Afridi told Al Jazeera. “There are several categories of people who are documented and registered as per requirement, so what does the government mean by removing them from Islamabad or Rawalpindi?”

The UNHCR says more than 800 Afghan nationals, including women and children, have already been deported from Islamabad and Rawalpindi since the start of the year.

Praising Pakistan’s “generosity” in hosting millions of Afghan refugees for the past four decades, Phillipa Chandler, the head of the UNHCR in Pakistan, urged the authorities to be more considerate.

“Forced return to Afghanistan could place some people at increased risk. We urge Pakistan to continue to provide safety to Afghans at risk, irrespective of their documentation status,” Chandler said, according to a UNHCR press release.

Looming deadline

The government notification from January has also set a March 31 deadline for Afghan citizens awaiting resettlement in third countries. Those who fail to leave by then risk deportation.

Afridi called the situation “complicated”, noting that thousands of Afghans arrived after August 2021 with legitimate asylum claims or pending resettlement cases.

“There are people whose resettlement cases are still being processed, and others who fear for their lives if they return to Afghanistan,” he said.

Advertisement

Since 2021, nearly 500,000 Afghan nationals have contacted the UNHCR for assistance.

“We have issued documentation to these people; to show they are listed in our system. All we want from the government is to at least recognise this, and to not arrest or deport them,” Afridi said.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs earlier this month stated that “almost 80,000 Afghans” have already been resettled in other countries, while 40,000 remain in Pakistan awaiting relocation.

Jamil, currently working for a media outlet, had applied for the US Welcome Corps, a United States government programme for refugees.

“I applied for this programme last year and I even received an email from the State Department that my case will get processed. I had my first interview in December, and I was informed that my settlement process will start in a few days,” he says.

But with the new Trump administration in office, Jamil is unsure what the future holds for him, as the new US president has put a pause on the refugee programme.

“After the new president came in, I was informed that the programme is on hold. I don’t know what will happen to that. Now, my PoR is expiring, and I have no idea what to do.”

Names marked with an asterisk* have been changed to protect identities.

Source: Al Jazeera
‘Please don’t do this’: Afghan families in Pakistan caught in crackdown
read more

UNAMA condemns Kabul and Kunduz attacks amid growing security concerns in Afghanistan

By Fidel Rahmati

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) condemned the recent explosions in Kabul and Kunduz provinces. UNAMA expressed sympathy to the families of the victims and condemned the violence.

The mission stressed that the security and well-being of the people must be protected, emphasizing that there is no place for violence in Afghanistan.

UNAMA called for the safeguarding of Afghan citizens’ safety and reiterated its stance against violent actions in the country, reaffirming its commitment to peace and stability.

On Thursday, a blast occurred near the Ministry of Urban Development in Kabul, resulting in the death of one person. This follows an explosion in Kunduz two days earlier.

The Islamic State (ISIS) claimed responsibility for the explosion in Kunduz, which resulted in five deaths and numerous injuries, further indicating a deterioration in security.

These recent attacks highlight the ongoing security challenges in Afghanistan, particularly with the presence of ISIS and other militant groups. The situation calls for urgent measures to ensure the safety of civilians and to address the growing instability.

The presence of ISIS in Afghanistan has been a significant concern, with the group actively carrying out attacks in various provinces. Their ability to claim responsibility for recent bombings highlights their continued threat to the country’s security.

Despite the Taliban’s denial of ISIS’s role in many attacks, the increasing frequency of such incidents suggests that the group’s influence is expanding. The Taliban’s failure to contain ISIS is raising doubts about their control over the country’s security.

UNAMA condemns Kabul and Kunduz attacks amid growing security concerns in Afghanistan
read more

Pakistan, Türkiye Stress Support for Peaceful Afghanistan

Some political experts believe that regional countries, including Pakistan and Türkiye, should take practical steps towards recognizing the Islamic Emirate.

The President of Türkiye Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the Prime Minister of Pakistan Shehbaz Sharif focused on regional issues, including Afghanistan, during their meeting in Islamabad.

In a joint statement, the two countries stressed the formation of an inclusive government, combating terrorism, respecting the rights of women and girls, and continuing humanitarian aid to Afghanistan.

According to the statement, Islamabad and Ankara expressed their support for a peaceful, stable Afghanistan and for international efforts to build a more sustainable future for the people of Afghanistan.

The statement reads: “Both countries reiterate their support for a peaceful and stable Afghanistan and for advancement of international efforts aimed at building a more sustainable future for the Afghan people through continued, coordinated and coherent engagement with the interim Afghan authorities including on countering terrorism. In this regard, they underlined the importance of inclusive governance, and respect for fundamental rights, particularly of girls and women in Afghanistan.”

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif of Pakistan said: “We expect that Afghanistan will cooperate in fighting terrorism and not spreading terrorism. Pakistan fully supports the cause of Northern Cyprus and fully stands by Türkiye on this cause in an unwavering vision.”

Although the Islamic Emirate has not yet responded to the recent statements by Pakistan and Türkiye, it had previously requested other countries not to interfere in Afghanistan’s internal affairs.

Some political experts believe that regional countries, including Pakistan and Türkiye, should take practical steps towards recognizing the Islamic Emirate.

“Türkiye is a large country and a NATO member. This country can take solid steps toward recognizing Afghanistan and can also persuade Pakistan to make efforts in this regard,” said Saleem Paigir, a political analyst.

Previously, the president of Pakistan had discussed Afghanistan’s integration into the international community and the sustainable development process during a meeting with his Chinese counterpart in Beijing.

Pakistan, Türkiye Stress Support for Peaceful Afghanistan
read more

36 Years Pass Since Soviet Union Left Afghanistan

The Soviet Union’s more than nine-year presence in Afghanistan is believed to have led to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Today, Friday, the 26th of Dalwa (February 14), marks the 36th anniversary of the Soviet Union’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Thirty-six years ago today, after nine years in Afghanistan and as a result of the people’s struggles, the Soviet military forces were forced to leave Afghanistan.

“Babrak Karmal was in Kabul when the Soviet forces left Afghanistan. According to decisions made inside the country and in Moscow, Dr. Najibullah came to power,” said Hadi Quraishi, a military analyst.

The Soviet Union’s more than nine-year presence in Afghanistan is believed to have led to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

This war claimed the lives of nearly two million people and caused thousands more to become disabled.

“On the 6th of Jaddi, when they arrived in military attire, there was war, and in that battle, Russian soldiers were killed,” said Abdul Wahed Taqat, a political analyst.

Mohammad Yaseen, one of the commanders who fought against the Soviet Union’s forces, was severely injured during this struggle. He shares his stories from that time.

He said: “When a bullet was fired near us, small fragments came towards me, hitting my eye and destroying my teeth.”

“For nearly three years, we fought with empty hands and old rifles against the enemy,” said Abubakr, a resident of Herat.

Finally, on Wednesday, the 26th of Dalwa, 1367 (1989), and nine months after the implementation of the Geneva Accords, General Boris Gromov, commander of the 40th Soviet Army Division, was the last Soviet soldier to cross the friendship bridge over the Amu River, between Afghanistan and Uzbekistan, officially declaring the end of the Soviet Union’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

36 Years Pass Since Soviet Union Left Afghanistan
read more

World Bank: Nearly 3M People in Afghanistan on Verge of Famine

The World Bank also said that climate change is one of the main drivers of food insecurity in Afghanistan.

The World Bank has once again stated that Afghanistan is facing a severe food security crisis. According to the bank’s latest report, 12.6 million people in Afghanistan are struggling with food insecurity, and nearly three million people are on the brink of famine.

The report states: “Afghanistan is facing a severe food security crisis. Nearly one-third of the population – 12.6 million people – are experiencing food insecurity, with 2.9 million on the brink of starvation. Economic instability, climate shocks, and disrupted agricultural productivity have left the nation struggling to meet basic needs.”

The World Bank also said that climate change is one of the main drivers of food insecurity in Afghanistan, significantly impacting the agricultural economy, which is already affected by the ongoing war.

“Every year, our crops are destroyed, and even our homes are damaged. We ask institutions and the government to help and cooperate with us,” said Enayatullah, a farmer.

Poverty and unemployment are among the main factors contributing to food insecurity in Afghanistan, which have arisen due to economic challenges, climate change, and years of conflict.

“There are six members in my family. I go out daily and work 30, 40, or 50 jobs until evening. The household expenses are covered, but because of the problems, there isn’t a day that passes easily,” said Daoud, a resident of Kabul.

However, the Ministry of Economy, emphasizing the continuation of humanitarian aid in Afghanistan, states that the Islamic Emirate has several programs aimed at reducing food insecurity in the country.

Abdul Latif Nazari, deputy minister of economy, said: “The Islamic Emirate has large-scale economic projects in hand to reduce food insecurity and create employment. At the same time, we urge the international community and aid organizations to assist the people of Afghanistan in reducing poverty and food insecurity.”

Concerns about food security in Afghanistan have increased as, following the US president’s order to suspend foreign aid, around 50 international organizations, mainly working in humanitarian sectors in Afghanistan, have halted their operations.

World Bank: Nearly 3M People in Afghanistan on Verge of Famine
read more

Russia warns UN Security Council about ISIS access to US Weapons in Afghanistan

Khaama Press

On Monday, Russia’s Ambassador to the United Nations stated at a Security Council meeting that the rise of ISIS-Khorasan’s activities in Afghanistan is not coincidental or without cause.

He highlighted that the international community had not adequately addressed the access terrorist groups like ISIS have to leftover American weapons in Afghanistan.

Vasily Nebenzya pointed out that NATO’s hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan resulted in many weapons being left behind, which ended up in the hands of ISIS. He emphasized that this situation should not be overlooked.

The Russian ambassador also claimed that the U.S. and Western countries are spreading weapons worldwide, and these weapons often end up in the hands of terrorist groups. He made a direct link between the leftover American weapons in Afghanistan and the intensification of ISIS attacks.

Expressing concern over terrorist activities in Afghanistan, Vasily Nebenzya emphasized that Moscow cannot ignore the situation and must address the growing threat posed by these groups in the region.

Nebenzya pointed out that the U.S. and Western countries are major distributors of weapons worldwide. He further noted that the majority of terrorist groups are using American-made weapons in their operations.

The international concern over the presence of leftover American weapons in Afghanistan highlights the risks of such weapons falling into the wrong hands. With the growing reach of ISIS, nations like Russia and other regional countries are intensifying their focus on global security threats.

The situation calls for better monitoring and control to prevent weapons from fueling terrorism. This issue, combined with the resurgence of groups like ISIS, requires coordinated international action.

Russia warns UN Security Council about ISIS access to US Weapons in Afghanistan
read more

Suicide attack in Kunduz kills and injures at least 12

Local sources in Kunduz province have reported that a suicide attack in the center of the province has left at least five dead and seven injured.

According to the sources, a powerful explosion occurred around 8:35 AM today, Tuesday, February 11 in front of a branch of Kabul Bank in the center of Kunduz.

Officials from the Taliban also confirmed the explosion, stating that a suicide bomber detonated themselves near Kabul Bank in Kunduz.

Jummahuddin Khaksar, spokesperson for the Taliban’s police in Kunduz, confirmed that five people, including members of the Taliban, were killed in the explosion, and seven others sustained injuries in the attack.

An eyewitness from the provincial hospital in Kunduz said that the bodies of 14 people have been brought to the hospital. Another source from the same hospital stated that at least 17 dead have been transferred to the hospital so far. Some sources have reported a higher number of casualties than these figures.

It is noteworthy that ISIS has claimed responsibility for all suicide attacks that have occurred in the past three years, including an earlier attack on members of the Taliban in front of a bank branch in Kandahar.

The increasing frequency of such attacks has raised concerns about the security situation in the country, especially as groups like ISIS continue to target officials and civilians. As investigations into the latest attack proceed, efforts to enhance security and prevent further attacks will likely become a priority for the authorities.

Suicide attack in Kunduz kills and injures at least 12
read more

Afghan Refugees in Limbo as Advocates Urge US Support

Donald Trump’s suspension of the refugee program has caused significant concern among Afghan citizens waiting in other countries.

The head of the AfghanEvac and a group of former US Army soldiers have urged the US Secretary of State to continue supporting Afghan allies

Shawn VanDiver, the head of AfghanEvac, the main coalition working on the resettlement of Afghans with the US government, has warned that the lack of support for these individuals will put their lives in greater danger.

According to VanDiver, failing to support these individuals could undermine trust in US forces in future wars.

Michael McCaul, former chairman of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, has also called on Donald Trump to lift the suspension of Afghan refugee admissions, particularly for those who worked alongside US forces in Afghanistan.

Regarding this issue, Michael McCaul stated: ” We promised them we would protect them when they worked with our servicemen and women in Afghanistan. These are the interpreters, the ones who are right alongside our combat veterans. They have these special immigrant visas and P1, P2 and it’s my- my view, that they should be allowed to go forward with the SIV program.”

Donald Trump’s suspension of the refugee program has caused significant concern among Afghan citizens waiting in other countries for decisions on their asylum cases.

According to a report by the Associated Press, after the issuance of this order, many former Afghan colleagues of US forces who were awaiting relocation to the United States have faced an uncertain future.

“We are stranded with no money in our pockets. We ask the government to create a proper plan so we can proceed with our journey,” Shafi, an Afghan migrant in Pakistan, told TOLOnews.

“The US State Department must work with both Islamabad and Doha to ensure necessary cooperation to reduce the difficulties these Afghan refugees are facing,” said Mohammad Khan Mohammadi, an activist for migrant rights.

Previously, the US vice president, in an interview with an American media outlet, defended Donald Trump’s order to suspend the Afghan refugee relocation program, stating that the security background checks on some applicants had not been fully completed before their entry into the United States.

Afghan Refugees in Limbo as Advocates Urge US Support
read more