UN Allocates $10 Million to Aid Vulnerable Afghan Returnees from Iran

 

The UN has dedicated $10 million to protect vulnerable Afghan returnees from Iran, addressing urgent needs and preventing exploitation at the borders.

Tom Fletcher, Deputy UN Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, announced on Tuesday that the UN Emergency Relief Fund is allocating $10 million to support Afghan migrants returning from Iran.

This funding targets the most vulnerable returnees, aiming to protect them from abuse and exploitation as they face harsh conditions at border crossings.

Thousands of Afghan migrants are expelled daily from Iran and left stranded without adequate shelter, healthcare, or food, exacerbating their humanitarian crisis.

Earlier, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) urged for increased funding to improve aid for returnees struggling with limited resources and services.

Returnees from both Iran and Pakistan confront severe shortages of essential support, making international humanitarian assistance critical to their survival.

The newly allocated funds will help provide vital protection and essential services to facilitate the safe reintegration of Afghan returnees into their communities.

Humanitarian agencies continue to call for increased global support to address the growing needs of displaced Afghans amid ongoing regional instability.

UN Allocates $10 Million to Aid Vulnerable Afghan Returnees from Iran
read more

For the first time in modern history a capital city is on the verge of running dry

By Alysha Bibi, Rhea Mogul and Masoud Popalzai

“We don’t have access to (drinking) water at all,” Raheela, who goes by one name, told CNN. “Water shortage is a huge problem affecting our daily life.”

(CNN) — As the sun rises over Kabul’s parched mountains, a family’s daily struggle to find water – and to make it last – is about to begin.

The sound of water tankers rumbling through Raheela’s neighborhood in the Afghan capital prompts the 42-year-old mother of four to rush out to the street to fill her family’s battered buckets and jerrycans. The family’s supply is always running low, she says, and every liter is expensive, stretching nerves and their budgets to breaking point.

“We don’t have access to (drinking) water at all,” Raheela, who goes by one name, told CNN. “Water shortage is a huge problem affecting our daily life.”

Kabul is inching toward catastrophe. It could soon become the first modern capital in the world to run completely dry according to a recent report by Mercy Corps, a non-government organization that warns the crisis could lead to economic collapse.

Population growth, the climate crisis, and relentless over-extraction have depleted groundwater levels, experts say, and nearly half the city’s boreholes have already gone dry.

Raheela’s family must pay for every drop of water, and watch how they use it carefully, sacrificing food and other essentials just to drink and bathe.

“We are deeply concerned,” she said. “We hope for more rain, but if things get worse, I don’t know how we’ll survive,” she told CNN.

It’s an emergency that “is not just a water issue,” warned Marianna Von Zahn, Mercy Corps’ Afghanistan director of programs. “It’s a health crisis, an economic crisis, and a humanitarian emergency all in one.”

A potent mix

Just three decades ago, Kabul’s population was less than 2 million, but the toppling of the Taliban in 2001 led to an influx of migrants, lured by the promise of increased security and economic possibility.

As its population grew, so did the demand for water.

Kabul relies almost entirely on groundwater, replenished by snow and glacier melt from the nearby Hindu Kush mountains. But years of mismanagement and over-extraction have caused those levels to drop by up to 30 meters over the last decade, according to Mercy Corps.

Kabul now extracts 44 million cubic meters more groundwater each year than nature can replenish, Mercy Corps said, a staggering imbalance that’s steadily draining the city’s reserves and its residents’ finances.

Some families, like Ahmad Yasin’s, have dug deeper wells, searching for more water to fill their buckets.

Yasin, 28, lives in a joint family of 10 in the city’s north. For months, he has queued along with his brother for hours every day at the nearby mosque, which has access to a big well, to bring full buckets home for his children, parents, nieces, and nephews.

“That was holding us back from our work and was affecting our income,” he said. So they saved for six months, sacrificing food, to come up with 40,000 Afghanis ($550) to dig a well in their backyard.

Yasin and his brother dug 120 meters before they could find any water – and while this water is free to use for all their basic needs, they can’t drink it. “It’s not safe,” he said.

“Since we spent all our money on the well, we cannot afford to buy a water filter or purified water. Hence, we boil the well water for extended periods of time, let it cool and then drink it.”

Up to 80% of Kabul’s groundwater is contaminated, according to Mercy Corps, a consequence of widespread pit latrine use and industrial waste pollution.

Diarrhea and vomiting are “problems people experience all the time in the city,” said Sayed Hamed, 36, who lives with his wife, three children and two elderly parents in the northwestern Taimani district.

“We often get sick due to contaminated water either by drinking in someone else’s house, in a restaurant, or even by brushing our teeth with the well water,” the government worker said.

The crisis is further compounded by Kabul’s vulnerability to climate change.

“We are getting more and more rain, but less and less snow,” said Najibullah Sadid, a water resource management researcher and member of the Afghan Water and Environment Professionals Network. “That’s impacting a city which has less infrastructure to regulate the flash floods… Snow was helping us, but now we have less, and that’s harming us in terms of groundwater recharge.”

If current trends continue, UNICEF predicts Kabul could run out of groundwater by 2030.

When water runs dry, many turn to tankers

Those without the means to dig hundreds of meters for water are at the mercy of private companies or must rely on donations.

Rustam Khan Taraki spends as much as 30% of his income on water, mostly buying from licensed tanker sellers.

But for families who can’t afford to spend this much, the only option is to walk often long distances to mosques, which can provide water.

Dawn sees Hamed, the government worker, lining up for hours at a nearby well to fill two buckets for his family. During the day, two of his children – 13 and nine years old – line up for a refill, sometimes skipping school to carry heavy buckets up their steep hill in the scorching sun.

The crisis is taking a toll on the children’s future, said Von Zahn from Mercy Corps. “The hours that children should be spending in school, they are now basically spending on fetching water for their families.” she said.

“These harmful coping strategies further deepen the cycle of poverty and vulnerability for women and children.”

Women shoulder much of this crisis — forced to walk for hours across Kabul just to fetch what little water they can, risking their safety under the Taliban’s oppressive rule which prohibits them from going outside without a mahram, or male guardian.

“It is not easy for a woman to go out, especially under the current circumstances where women need to have male company from her family to be able to go out,” a 22-year-old Kabul resident, who did not want to disclose her name for safety reasons, told CNN.

“There are numerous difficulties for every woman or girl to go out alone to get water. They could be harassed or bothered on the way,” she said.

CNN has contacted the Taliban for a response.

A dire future

Beyond the climate crisis, population growth and mismanagement, Kabul’s water crisis is compounded by deep political turmoil.

The Taliban seized control of the country in August 2021 following the chaotic withdrawal of US-led forces after nearly two decades of war, tipping the country to the brink of economic collapse as development and security assistance to the country froze.

Since then, humanitarian aid – aimed at funding urgent needs through non-profit organizations and bypassing government control – filled some of the gap. But US President Donald Trump’s decision earlier this year to halt foreign aid has further set back the country with crippling consequences.

The freeze in US Agency for International Development (USAID) funds is “one of the biggest impacts,” said Von Zahn from Mercy Corps. By early 2025, only about $8 million of the $264 million required for water and sanitation had been delivered.

“So what we’re seeing is a dangerous mix: collapsing local systems, frozen funding, and growing regional friction — all while ordinary Afghans face a worsening crisis every day,” she said.

That leaves the future of many living in Kabul in limbo.

Years ago, when Raheela and her family moved to their current neighborhood, the rent was cheaper, the mosque had water and life was manageable, she said.

Now, she doesn’t know how much longer they can survive in the city.

“We won’t have any other choice but to be displaced again,” she said, “Where will we go from here? I don’t know.”

For the first time in modern history a capital city is on the verge of running dry
read more

UN concerned by Taliban’s arrest of Afghan women and girls for dress code violations

Associated Press
July 21, 2025

ISLAMABAD (AP) — The United Nations on Monday expressed concern about the Taliban’s arrest of Afghan women and girls for their alleged failure to comply with the authorities’ dress code.

In May 2022, the Taliban government issued a decree calling for women to show only their eyes and recommending they wear a head-to-toe burqa. The Taliban, which returned to power in 2021, has cracked down on the way women dress and behave in public, notably through morality laws forbidding them to show their faces outside the home.

The U.N. mission in Afghanistan said it was concerned by the arrest of “numerous” women and girls in Kabul between July 16 and 19, who authorities claimed had not followed instructions on wearing the hijab, or the Islamic headscarf.

“These incidents serve to further isolate women and girls, contribute to a climate of fear, and erode public trust,” the mission added, without details including the number of arrests or the ages and where they have been held.

The U.N. mission urged the Taliban government to “ rescind policies and practices ” that restrict women and girls’ human rights and fundamental freedoms, particularly the ban on education beyond sixth grade.

A Taliban representative was not immediately available for comment.

In January 2024, the country’s Vice and Virtue Ministry said it had arrested women in the Afghan capital for wearing “bad hijab.” A ministry spokesman, Abdul Ghafar Farooq, did not say how many women were arrested or what constituted bad hijab.

The U.N. mission said at the time it was looking into claims of ill treatment of the women and extortion in exchange for their release.

The Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021 following the withdrawal of U.S. and NATO forces. Since then, the Taliban administration has sought international recognition while enforcing its interpretation of Islamic law. In July, Russia became the only country to grant formal recognition.

 

UN concerned by Taliban’s arrest of Afghan women and girls for dress code violations
read more

Elderly British couple face dying in Afghanistan detention, UN experts warn

UN human rights experts have warned that an elderly British couple detained in Afghanistan may die in “degrading conditions” as they demand they be moved to hospital for medical treatment.

Peter and Barbie Reynolds, aged 80 and 75, have been detained by the Taliban without charges in Afghanistan, where they lived, since February and their health has rapidly deteriorated.

In a statement released on Monday, the UN experts said they saw “no reason why this older couple should be detained at all, and have requested an immediate review of the grounds of their detention”.

An elderly couple dressed in Afghan clothes with the woman wearing a purple scarf over her hair
Children of elderly UK couple jailed by Taliban call for release before they ‘die in custody’

The group, which includes the UN special rapporteur on torture, Alice Jill Edwards, said: “It is inhumane to keep them locked up in such degrading conditions and more worrying when their health is so fragile. Our first demand is their immediate transfer to a civilian hospital for medical treatment.”

The couple were imprisoned in a maximum-security facility and in underground cells without sunlight before being moved to above-ground cells last week. The experts said their “physical and mental health is deteriorating rapidly” and that “without access to adequate medical care, they are at risk of irreparable harm or even death”.

They said Peter Reynolds recently collapsed and had had two eye infections and intermittent tremors in his head and down his left arm since being jailed. They said he needed heart medication after suffering a transient ischemic attack in 2023 and there were “grave concerns” about his wellbeing. His children said there had been a recurrence of skin cancer on his face, which would require urgent treatment.

The group said Barbie Reynolds had anaemia and “remains weak and frail, potentially caused by months of poor quality and quantity of food”. She has reported that her feet have become numb.

The couple have lived in Afghanistan for 18 years, where they founded a research and training business.

The UN group said the Reynolds had been deprived of liberty in very difficult conditions without proper legal proceedings, no access to effective legal assistance or medical care and only limited contact with their family by telephone. “The psychological toll on their health from not knowing why they are being held or when they are to be released is cruel treatment,” they said.

The couple, who recently celebrated their 55th wedding anniversary, have four children, who live in the UK and the US. On Sunday they issued a plea for their parents to be released “before it is too late”.

Elderly British couple face dying in Afghanistan detention, UN experts warn
read more

Pakistan Will Not Renew Afghan Refugee ID Cards, Minister Confirms

Khaama Press

Pakistan’s Interior Minister confirmed the government will not renew Afghan refugee ID cards, and deported individuals will be blacklisted from re-entering the country.

Pakistan’s Interior Minister, Mohsin Naqvi, has announced that the government will not extend the Proof of Registration (POR) cards issued to Afghan refugees. He also stated that deported individuals will be placed on a blacklist, barring their re-entry into Pakistan.

Naqvi made these remarks on Friday, July 18, during an informal conversation with journalists in Islamabad. His statement signals a firm stance by the Pakistani government on its evolving immigration policy.

According to the interior minister, the expulsion of Afghan refugees and their inclusion in a re-entry blacklist are part of broader changes in Pakistan’s immigration framework. These measures are being taken as part of a new policy direction aimed at tightening border and residency controls.

The deportation of Afghan refugees from Pakistan began last year and has continued steadily. Thousands of Afghan families have been forced to leave, often without consideration of their humanitarian or security circumstances.

This policy shift has sparked criticism from human rights groups and international observers, who warn that the move could further endanger vulnerable populations, especially women and children, returning to uncertain conditions in Afghanistan.

The Pakistani government maintains that its actions are necessary for national security and lawful migration enforcement. However, the lack of legal pathways and the abrupt nature of deportations have raised serious ethical and humanitarian concerns.

As regional instability persists, pressure is mounting on both Pakistan and the international community to find sustainable and humane solutions to the refugee crisis. International cooperation and renewed diplomatic efforts may be critical in addressing the root causes and consequences of forced migration in South Asia.

Pakistan Will Not Renew Afghan Refugee ID Cards, Minister Confirms
read more

Richard Bennett: Deportations from Germany to Afghanistan Violate International Law

Khaama Press

Richard Bennett, UN Special Rapporteur for Afghanistan, condemned Germany’s deportation of 81 Afghan citizens, warning of more deportations and urging a halt to the process.

Richard Bennett, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights for Afghanistan, expressed deep concern on Saturday regarding the deportation of 81 Afghan citizens from Germany. He emphasized the troubling nature of these deportations, which were carried out in collaboration with the Taliban and Qatar, and warned that more deportations might be imminent.

Bennett called for an immediate halt to the deportations, underscoring that even in the case of individuals with criminal records, international laws—including the principle of “non-refoulement”—must be respected. He stressed that sending people back to Afghanistan, where they could face serious danger, is not a viable solution.

Human rights organizations have repeatedly raised alarms about the forced return of Afghan refugees, citing the hazardous conditions under Taliban rule. These groups argue that Afghanistan is currently too dangerous for many people to return to, especially given the repressive measures and human rights abuses carried out by the Taliban regime.

The principle of “non-refoulement,” which prohibits the return of individuals to places where they may face harm, has been a cornerstone of international refugee law. By ignoring this principle, countries like Germany risk violating their commitments to human rights.

Bennett’s comments reflect growing concerns about the treatment of Afghan refugees and deportees. With the humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan still ongoing, the forced return of individuals to the country could exacerbate their suffering and further destabilize the region.

The forced deportations of Afghan citizens raise serious questions about international responsibilities and human rights. Countries must ensure they adhere to international law, especially when it comes to protecting vulnerable individuals from harm. Deporting individuals to a country where they face risks of violence or persecution contradicts the principles of justice and human dignity.

In light of these concerns, it is crucial for governments worldwide to reevaluate their policies regarding Afghan refugees. Upholding human rights and adhering to international laws should be central to any decision involving the deportation of individuals. A more compassionate and thoughtful approach is necessary to protect those fleeing conflict and oppression.

Richard Bennett: Deportations from Germany to Afghanistan Violate International Law
read more

UN Human Rights Chief: Over 1.9 Million Afghans Deported from Iran and Pakistan

Over 1.9 million Afghan migrants were deported from Iran and Pakistan in seven months, prompting UN calls to halt forced, unsafe returns immediately.

Volker Türk, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, has reported that more than 1.9 million Afghan migrants have been deported from Iran and Pakistan in the past seven months.

Speaking on Friday, July 18, Türk stated that over 1.5 million people were returned from Iran, while more than 300,000 were expelled from Pakistan.

He warned that many of those being deported face serious risks of abuse, torture, or arbitrary detention in Afghanistan and should not be forcibly returned.

The High Commissioner called for an immediate halt to deportations, emphasizing that returns must be voluntary, safe, dignified, and in line with international law.

According to Türk, Afghanistan is facing a severe humanitarian and human rights crisis. Returnees—whether forced or voluntary—face discrimination, violence, economic hardship, and lack of employment opportunities.

He stressed that specific groups such as women, girls, journalists, and former government employees are particularly vulnerable and under serious threat in Afghanistan.

These warnings come as the pace of forced deportations of Afghan refugees from neighboring countries continues to increase, raising alarm among rights organizations.

In a recent case, Germany deported 81 Afghan refugees, citing criminal records. This incident adds to growing international concern about the safety and legality of such deportations.

The UN has urged all countries to prioritize protection, uphold asylum rights, and avoid returning individuals to dangerous conditions. The current deportation trend, if continued, may deepen Afghanistan’s ongoing crisis and put thousands more lives at risk.

UN Human Rights Chief: Over 1.9 Million Afghans Deported from Iran and Pakistan
read more

Kabul Faces One of Its Most Severe Water Crises

According to a report by (UN-Habitat), the dramatic decline in Kabul’s water levels has put nearly six million people at risk of water scarcity.

Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, is currently grappling with one of the most critical water crises in its history.

According to data, water levels in many central and western parts of Kabul have dropped significantly, severely affecting the lives of millions of residents.

Mohammad Agha, a Kabul resident, said: “Everything depends on water. Without it, life becomes extremely difficult. If these petrol stations stop giving water, people will die of hunger and thirst.”

Another resident, Najibullah, added: “Children and women wander day and night with buckets, but there’s no water. A woman came and said she hadn’t performed ablution today because there’s not even enough water for that.”

According to a report by the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), the dramatic decline in Kabul’s water levels has put nearly six million people at risk of water scarcity.

The agency described the crisis as “unprecedented,” emphasizing the need for large-scale investment, stronger cooperation, and increased public awareness on water use and management to confront the issue.

Meanwhile, residents are urging the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan to address their concerns by expanding water supply networks and digging deeper wells.

Mohammad Naseem, another Kabul resident, said: “If these petrol stations don’t give us water, no one else will. Our children go to the neighbors, but they get beaten and told they won’t be given water. We ask the Islamic Emirate to drill wells for us so we can have our own water and access it day and night.”

Despite the growing concern among Kabul’s population, officials from the Islamic Emirate have repeatedly promised to resolve the issue, but no concrete action has yet been taken.

Kabul Faces One of Its Most Severe Water Crises
read more

Merz: Diplomatic Recognition of Islamic Emirate Is Not Under Consideration

Without providing details about the nature of these talks, he added that Qatar played a key role in facilitating them.

Friedrich Merz, the Chancellor of Germany, stated that recognizing Afghanistan’s interim government is not on Germany’s agenda.

This statement comes amid questions raised within Germany regarding the nature of relations between Kabul and Berlin, following the deportation of 81 Afghan asylum seekers.

Merz said: “I reiterate: Diplomatic recognition of the Taliban is not on the agenda at all, and such a matter is not being considered. Therefore, the critical question is how we engage with them. Until further notice, this matter will remain limited to technical coordination.”

Although the German Chancellor confirmed that discussions with Afghanistan’s interim government have taken place, he clarified that such interactions are strictly technical.

Without providing details about the nature of these talks, he added that Qatar played a key role in facilitating them.

Friedrich Merz stated: “I cannot and will not speak about the details of these discussions because they were held confidentially. There had been prior technical contacts with Afghanistan. I want to clearly thank the Emir of Qatar and the Qatari government. Qatar played an important role in this process.”

Meanwhile, Germany’s Interior Minister, Alexander Dobrindt, who had previously emphasized the need to engage with the interim Afghan government, now maintains that Germany must be able to carry out deportations to Afghanistan and other countries independently of strategic partners such as Qatar.

Dobrindt said: “Qatar supported us as a strategic partner in this effort. However, I state clearly that we must also be able to carry out such deportations in the future without strategic partners whether to Afghanistan or Syria.”

Yesterday, with Qatar’s mediation, Germany deported 81 Afghan nationals it classified as criminals, flying them from Leipzig Airport to Kabul.

Germany’s Foreign Ministry confirmed that the deportation took place following extensive discussions between the German government and the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

Merz: Diplomatic Recognition of Islamic Emirate Is Not Under Consideration
read more

In ‘Retrograde’ lawsuit, war-zone filmmaking could face a legal test

The Washington Post

July 18, 2025

The estate of an Afghan man who was killed after appearing in the acclaimed documentary “Retrograde” is suing, claiming negligence.W

The complexities of reporting in conflict zones are getting a public airing in a negligence lawsuit working its way through a Los Angeles court against the makers of an acclaimed documentary about the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.

The suit filed in California Superior Court for Los Angeles County against National Geographic, Disney, Hulu and director Matthew Heineman’s production company alleges that an Afghan man who appeared in the Emmy-winning “Retrograde” was killed by the Taliban because filmmakers ignored warnings that showing him would put him in danger.

The suit accuses the defendants of depicting the man in the 2022 film “for commercial gain while knowingly placing him in grave danger.” The suit also labels the filmmakers and distributors as “immoral, unethical, oppressive [and] unscrupulous.”

The dead man’s estate is represented by a prominent Florida law firm, Kelley Uustal, that won an $82 million jury award in a business-dispute case for hip-hop artist Flo Rida. The firm has also done legal work on behalf of a teenager who claims he is the rightful owner of the baseball that Los Angeles Dodgers star Shohei Ohtani knocked into the stands last year for his historic 50th home run, setting off a violent fan scramble. (The man who retrieved it from the fracas sold it at auction for more than $4 million.)Follow

In its court responses to the “Retrograde” lawsuit, attorneys representing Our Time Projects, Disney, National Geographic and Hulu have moved to strike the complaint under a law that allows for early termination of cases that threaten to punish speech protected by the First Amendment. National Geographic produces documentaries as part of a joint agreement with Disney; “Retrograde” was shown on Disney-owned Hulu.

“The First Amendment [does not] allow courts to hold producers and distributors liable for the actions of third parties, like the Taliban’s violent reprisals following their return to power,” a defense court filing states.

“The fact that numerous Afghan civilians who worked to better their country were targeted and tortured by the Taliban is horrible,” a court filing acknowledged. “But that doesn’t mean documentarians reporting on the Taliban’s resurgence are responsible for that conduct.”

Attorneys for the filmmakers and distributors also argue that the lawsuit seeks to “sidestep the First Amendment” by arguing they should have blurred faces. “That is a fully protected editorial decision,” the lawyers wrote. (The defense is represented by the national firm of Davis Wright Tremaine, whose media clients have included The Washington Post.)

Lawyers for the defense state that the documentarians obtained consent from their subjects to be filmed, including showing their faces, and that allegations in the lawsuit involve conduct that cannot be attributed to National Geographic, Disney and Hulu.

In an affidavit, Heineman says that he obtained consent to film the Afghans from the leaders of their unit and that the subjects were filmed “openly and obviously” without objection.

“The Supreme Court has made crystal clear that the First Amendment protects editorial judgments regarding matters of public concern,” Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., an attorney for Heineman and producer Caitlin McNally, said in an email to The Post. “This includes the use of footage from combat zones that the filmmakers presented in Retrograde, consistent with the well-established approach taken by numerous news organizations.” (Boutrous has also represented The Post on media issues.)

“Retrograde” was removed from all platforms, including the Hulu streaming service, in 2024 after The Post contacted National Geographic and Disney with questions about whether the film endangered Afghans hired by the U.S. military to clear mines. The Post’s article revealed that five former and current U.S. service members warned the filmmakers, including McNally and Heineman, that they should blur faces of the Afghan mine-clearers.

Charlie Crail, a U.S. military media officer assigned to the film project, told The Post last year that the Afghan mine-clearers consented to be filmed before the U.S. withdrawal. After the withdrawal, Crail said he warned the documentarians against showing the faces of workers who were still in the country, because of concerns about Taliban reprisals.

The U.S. military signed off on the film after a prerelease review, one of its conditions for assisting the project. The military’s reading of its contract with Heineman’s team was that it did not give them the right to demand changes related to Afghan contractors, according to a U.S. service member involved in the process.

In a statement to The Post for the 2024 article, Heineman and McNally said they had no recollection of receiving specific warnings about the bomb-clearing crew and emphasized that the film was released following sign-offs from the U.S. military and National Geographic/Disney.

“Any attempt to blame ‘Retrograde’ because the film showed faces of individuals in war zones — as has long been standard in ethical conflict reporting — would be deeply wrong,” their statement said.

If the California negligence lawsuit goes to trial, it’s possible that issues raised by both the plaintiffs and the defendants about the filmmaking process and the ethics of conflict reporting would be presented to jurors.

Since its original article, The Post has obtained previously unreported documents and emails that shed additional light on the making of “Retrograde” and its depiction of Afghan contractors.

The documents show that concerns about the dead man — whom U.S. Green Berets had nicknamed “Justin Bieber” because of his good looks and thick hair — were included in a minute-by-minute security review of the documentary conducted by “Retrograde” crew members in August 2022, shortly before the film was slated for its festival debut at Telluride, Colorado. (The Post is not using his name to protect his family from potential harm. He is referred to as “John Doe” in the lawsuit.)

The new documents show that not only did the “Retrograde” crew receive general warnings from current and former U.S. service members before its theatrical and streaming debuts about the risks of endangering Afghans shown in the movie, they also appear to have received a specific warning about the man who was later killed.

Multiple Afghans are shown in a scene in which Green Berets tell Afghan mine-clearers that the United States is withdrawing — the only scene in which the man who later died appears. The man is the only mine-clearer mentioned in the security review, which was conducted by McNally and another “Retrograde” crew member, Joe DeGrand.

In the security review, McNally flagged a section in the film, writing “we’re very concerned about the [National Mine Removal Group] guy because he is still in country from what we hear; blur all identifying info on uniform.” She repeats the request to blur identifying information for two other sections of the film. (McNally did not respond to a question about who had told her the man was still in Afghanistan.)

DeGrand emailed the security review to Heineman, including recommendations for dozens of sections of the film.

Later, another “Retrograde” crew member emailed McNally and DeGrand with Heineman’s suggestions for addressing some of the flagged concerns with “reframes, subtle blurs or VFX,” a reference to a visual-effects technique.

In an email, Boutrous said that the review resulted in the removal of “identifying information, including names on the uniforms” of several military personnel depicted in the documentary.

But since the man who later died had “no such identifying information on his uniform that was visible on-screen … no action was necessary,” and filmmakers made no changes to his appearance.

In The Post’s May 2024 article, a National Geographic spokesperson said Disney’s global intelligence and threat analysis manager conducted a review of the film before it was released but rebutted statements by two U.S. military service members, in interviews and text messages reviewed by The Post, who said they cautioned Disney about showing faces of the Afghan contractors and urged the company to blur faces or take other steps to protect them.

When the film debuted, the man was shown in a lingering close-up.

“It was just so needlessly unsafe to me,” DeGrand said in an interview with The Post. “They chose to put this guy into the spotlight when there were other shots and materials available to not do that. There are tons of different ways to do this scene that anonymize him or don’t feature him so prominently.”

Shortly after the film’s theatrical and streaming releases, a pirated clip of the scene showing the man circulated on social media. He was later captured by the Taliban and tortured, eventually dying from his injuries, according to The Post’s reporting. In his final days, the man said that his captors told him they identified him because of the clip showing him in “Retrograde,” according to one interpreter and text messages from another interpreter and a family friend.

“Retrograde” went on to receive positive reviews from critics and three Emmy Awards — for cinematography, editing and current affairs documentary. It was shortlisted for an Oscar and won an Edward R. Murrow Award for current affairs documentary. After The Post reported on the man’s death, the Radio Television Digital News Association, which oversees the Murrow Awards, conducted a review and rescinded “Retrograde’s” prize — the first time in the organization’s history that it had pulled back an award for issues related to journalism.

DeGrand did not learn of the man’s death until The Post published its 2024 article. Ever since, he said, he has agonized over his involvement on the film and lamented that the recommendation to shield the man’s identity was not followed.

“To knowingly put someone in danger for the benefit of your movie is selfish,” DeGrand said. “And I don’t think it makes it a better movie.”

The court has not yet ruled on the request by Our Time Projects, Disney and National Geographic to dismiss the lawsuit. The defendants have asked for a hearing on their request.

Hope Hodge Seck and Alice Crites contributed to this report.

In ‘Retrograde’ lawsuit, war-zone filmmaking could face a legal test
read more