‘End is near’: Will Kabul become first big city without water by 2030?

By Ruchi Kumar

Al Jazeera
5 Jul 2025

The city of six million people could soon run out water, amid climate change, sanctions and governance failures, say experts.

Kabul, a city of over six million people, could become the first modern city to run out of water in the next five years, a new report has warned.

Groundwater levels in the Afghan capital have dropped drastically due to over-extraction and the effects of climate change, according to a report published by nonprofit Mercy Corps.

So, is Kabul’s water crisis at a tipping point and do Afghan authorities have the resources and expertise to address the issue?

The depth of the crisis

Kabul’s aquifer levels have plummeted 25-30 metres (82 – 98 feet) in the past decade, with extraction of water exceeding natural recharge by a staggering 44 million cubic metres (1,553cu feet) a year, the report, published in April this year, noted.

If the current trend continues, Kabul’s aquifers will become dry by 2030, posing an existential threat to the Afghan capital, according to the report. This could cause the displacement of some three million Afghan residents, it said.

The report said UNICEF projected that nearly half of Kabul’s underground bore wells, the primary source of drinking water for residents, are already dry.

It also highlights widespread water contamination: Up to 80 percent of groundwater is believed to be unsafe, with high levels of sewage, arsenic and salinity.

Conflict, climate change and government failures
Experts point to a combination of factors behind the crisis: climate change, governance failures and increasing pressures on existing resources as the city’s population has expanded from less than one million in 2001 to roughly six million people today.

Two decades of US-led military intervention in Afghanistan also played a role in the crisis, as it forced more people to move to Kabul while governance in the rest of the country suffered.

“The prediction is based on the growing gap between groundwater recharge and annual water extraction. These trends have been consistently observed over recent years, making the forecast credible,” said Assem Mayar, water resource management expert and former lecturer at Kabul Polytechnic University.

“It reflects a worst-case scenario that could materialise by 2030 if no effective interventions are made,” he added.

Najibullah Sadid, senior researcher and a member of the Afghanistan Water and Environment Professionals Network, said it was impossible to put a timeline on when the capital city would run dry. But he conceded that Kabul’s water problems are grave.

“Nobody can claim when the last well will run dry, but what we know is that as the groundwater levels further drop, the capacity of deep aquifers become less – imagine the groundwater as a bowl with depleting water,” he said.

“We know the end is near,” he said.

Over-extraction highlights divides

A vast portion of the Afghan capital relies on underground borewells, and as water levels drop, people dig deeper or in different locations looking for sources of water.

According to an August 2024 report by the National Statistics Directorate, there are approximately 310,000 drilled wells across the country. According to the Mercy Corps report, it is estimated that there are also nearly 120,000 unregulated bore wells across Kabul.

A 2023 UN report found that nearly 49 percent of borewells in Kabul are dry, while others are functioning at only 60 percent efficiency.

The water crisis, Mayar said, exposes the divide between the city’s rich and poor. “Wealthier residents can afford to drill deeper boreholes, further limiting access for the poorest,” he said. “The crisis affects the poorest first.”

The signs of this divide are evident in longer lines outside public water taps or private water takers, says Abdulhadi Achakzai, director at the Environmental Protection Trainings and Development Organization (EPTDO), a Kabul-based climate protection NGO.

Poorer residents, often children, are forced to continually search for sources of water.

“Every evening, even late at night, when I am returning home from work, I see young children with small cans in their hands looking for water … they look hopeless, navigating life collecting water for their homes rather than studying or learning,” he said.

Additionally, Sadid said, Kabul’s already depleted water resources were being exploited by the “over 500 beverage and mineral water companies” operating in the capital city,” all of which are using Kabul’s groundwater”. Alokozay, a popular Afghan soft drinks company, alone extracts nearly one billion litres (256 million gallons) of water over a year — 2.5 million litres (660,000 gallons) a day — according to Sadid’s calculations.

Al Jazeera sent Alokozay questions about its water extraction on June 21, but has yet to receive a response.

Kabul, Sadid said, also had more than 400 hectares (9,884 acres) of green houses to grow vegetables, which suck up 4 billion litres (1.05 billion gallons) of water every year, according to his calculations. “The list [of entities using Kabul water] is long,” he said.

‘Repeated droughts, early snowmelt and reduced snowfall’

The water shortage is further compounded by climate change. Recent years have seen a significant reduction in precipitation across the country.

“The three rivers — Kabul river, Paghman river and Logar river—that replenish Kabul’s groundwater rely heavily on snow and glacier meltwater from the Hindu Kush mountains,” the Mercy Corps report noted. “However, between October 2023 to January 2024, Afghanistan only received only 45 to 60 percent of the average precipitation during the peak winter season compared to previous years.”

Mayar, the former lecturer at Kabul Polytechnic University, said that while it was difficult to quantify exactly how much of the crisis was caused by climate change, extreme weather events had only added to Kabul’s woes.

“Climate-related events such as repeated droughts, early snowmelts, and reduced snowfall have clearly diminished groundwater recharge opportunities,” he said.

Additionally, increased air temperature has led to greater evaporation, raising agricultural water consumption, said Sadid from the Afghanistan Water and Environment Professionals Network.

While several provinces have experienced water scarcity, particularly within agrarian communities, Kabul remains the worst affected due to its growing population.

Decades of conflict

Sadid argued Kabul’s crisis runs deeper than the impact of climate change, compounded by years of war, weak governance, and sanctions on the aid-dependent country.

Much of the funds channelled into the country were diverted to security for the first two decades of the century. Since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021, funding has been used to tackle an escalating humanitarian crisis. Western sanctions have also significantly stymied development projects that could have helped Kabul better manage the current water crisis.

As a result, authorities have struggled with the maintenance of pipelines, canals and dams — including basic tasks like de-sedimentation.

“The crisis is already beyond the capacity of the current de facto authorities,” Mayar said, referring to the Taliban. “In well-managed cities, such impacts are mitigated through robust water governance and infrastructure. Kabul lacks such capacity, and the current authorities are unable to address the problem without external support,” he added.

As a result, environmental resilience projects have taken a backseat.

“Several planned initiatives, including projects for artificial groundwater recharge, were suspended following the Taliban takeover,” Mayar pointed out. “Sanctions continue to restrict organisations and donors from funding and implementing essential water-related projects in Afghanistan,” he said.

Sadid pointed out one example: An Awater supply project -funded by the German Development bank KfW, along with European agencies – could have supplied 44 billion litres (11 billion gallons) of water annually to parts of Kabul from Logar aquifers.

“But currently this project has been suspended,” he said, even though two-thirds of the initiative was already completed when the government of former President Ashraf Ghani collapsed in 2021.

Similarly, India and the Ghani government had signed an agreement in 2021 for the construction of the Shah-toot dam on the Kabul River. Once completed, the dam could supply water to large parts of Kabul, Sadid said, “but its fate is uncertain now.”

What can be done to address the water crisis?
Experts recommend the development of the city’s water infrastructure as the starting point to address the crisis.

“Artificial groundwater recharge and the development of basic water infrastructure around the city are urgently needed. Once these foundations are in place, a citywide water supply network can gradually be developed,” Mayar recommended.

Achakzai agreed that building infrastructure and its maintenance were key elements of any fix.

“Aside from introducing new pipelines to the city from nearby rivers, such as in Panjshir, there needs to be an effort to recharge underground aquifers with constructions of check dams and water reservoirs,” he said, adding that these structures will also facilitate rainwater harvesting and groundwater replenishment.

“[The] Afghan government needs to renew ageing water pipes and systems. Modernising infrastructure will improve efficiency and reduce water loss,” he added.

Yet all of that is made harder by Afghanistan’s global isolation and the sanctions regime it is under, Achakzai said.

“Sanctions restrict Afghanistan’s access to essential resources, technology, and funding needed for water infrastructure development and maintenance,” he said. This, in turn, reduces agricultural productivity, and increases hunger and economic hardship, forcing communities to migrate, he warned.

Source: Al Jazeera

‘End is near’: Will Kabul become first big city without water by 2030?
read more

Troops kill 30 militants attempting to sneak into Pakistan from Afghanistan

Associated Press

It said the members of the Pakistani Taliban were spotted overnight in the North Waziristan district in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and the troops seized weapons, ammunition and explosives from the militants. The military’s statement did not mention if there was a gunfight or other details of the operation.

The military alleged the militants were backed by India and asked the Afghan government to prevent the use of its territory by “foreign proxies” to attack Pakistan.

There was no immediate comment from New Delhi. Pakistani authorities often accuse India of backing outlawed groups like the Baloch Liberation Army and Pakistani Taliban who commit violence in Pakistan. Such accusations have increased since a shooting in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April heightened tensions between the nuclear-armed nations.

Pakistani troops killed 54 insurgents in the same area in April.

Militant violence has surged in Pakistan in recent months, much of it blamed on the Pakistani Taliban. The group is separate from the Afghan Taliban but closely allied with them. Many of its leaders and fighters have found sanctuary in Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover in 2021.

 

Troops kill 30 militants attempting to sneak into Pakistan from Afghanistan
read more

Afghan P1 and P2 Case Holders Stranded in Pakistan call for swift resumption of USRAP and Relocation

Khaama Press

Afghan P1 and P2 case holders in Pakistan urgently appeal for the resumption of USRAP, relocation, and essential support for their families’ well-being.

On 4th July 2025, Afghan holders of P1 and P2 refugee cases, residing in Pakistan, formally protested and sent a written letter to the Khaama Press, voicing their deep concerns regarding the suspension of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) and the grave humanitarian crisis they are currently facing. The group of Afghan refugees, who had previously worked alongside U.S. institutions and projects, called for immediate action to address their plight, which has been exacerbated by the ongoing suspension of USRAP and their uncertain future.

The P1 and P2 case holders are Afghan refugees who, for years, collaborated with U.S. forces and institutions on various projects, including military support, interpretation, and advisory roles. As part of their commitment to rebuilding Afghanistan, they followed official guidance from the U.S. Department of State and applied for resettlement under USRAP. Having completed all necessary requirements, including medical checks, security screenings, and interviews, they were on the verge of being relocated when the new U.S. administration suspended the program. This suspension has left them stranded in Pakistan, where they have endured severe living conditions for over three years.

The protestors conveyed their dire circumstances, emphasizing that their lives remain in limbo, unable to move forward or return to Afghanistan, which is under a regime known for widespread human rights abuses. They highlighted several pressing concerns:

Humanitarian Crisis: The protestors outlined the psychological and physical toll of their current situation, noting that the uncertainty surrounding their resettlement has led to tragic consequences. Four case holders have died as a result of suicide, strokes, or heart attacks, unable to bear the inhumane conditions any longer.

Impact on Children: Children of P1 and P2 case holders are particularly vulnerable, facing a lack of education, healthcare, and psychological support. These children, who are innocent victims of war and violence, wake up each day asking when they will be able to leave their current situation, highlighting the emotional and mental strain they are enduring.

Risk of Persecution: With no legal protection in Pakistan and a return to Afghanistan posing significant risks of death, torture, and persecution, the protestors are calling for immediate action to prevent further harm to themselves and their families.

Demands and Appeals

  1. Immediate Reactivation of USRAP: The protestors called on the U.S. government to immediately resume the resettlement process for P1 and P2 case holders who have completed all necessary requirements in Pakistan. They requested that the U.S. authorities take swift action to ensure that their relocation process is expedited.
  2. Reinstatement of Flights and Expedited Relocation: The refugees demanded that the canceled flights be reinstated and relocation to their destination countries be prioritized without further delay.
  3. Comprehensive Support for Affected Families: The protestors called for comprehensive psychological, educational, medical, and legal support for themselves and their families to help mitigate the ongoing harm caused by their prolonged stay in Pakistan.
  4. Intervention by IOM and UNHCR: The International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) were urged to intervene immediately and address the concerns of the P1 and P2 case holders. The protestors highlighted the importance of IOM and UNHCR fulfilling their protective roles to ensure the safety and well-being of these refugees.

The protest of the Afghan P1 and P2 case holders, as conveyed through their letter to Khaama Press, is a call for urgent humanitarian action. After years of service to U.S. institutions, they now face an uncertain future, stranded in a foreign country with no clear path forward. The written protest seeks to draw attention to the gravity of their situation, urging both the U.S. government and international organizations to take immediate and decisive action to address their concerns.

The protestors continue to hold onto hope that their two-decade-long partnership with the U.S. will not be forgotten, and that the promises made to them will be fulfilled. Their final plea is for a chance to live with dignity and security, as they await a resolution to their resettlement process.

Afghan P1 and P2 Case Holders Stranded in Pakistan call for swift resumption of USRAP and Relocation
read more

Richard Bennett expresses concern over Media Restrictions in Afghanistan

Khaama Press
Richard Bennett expressed concern over recent media restrictions in Afghanistan, warning that these measures reflect increasing authoritarianism and threaten press freedom.

Richard Bennett, the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in Afghanistan, raised significant concerns regarding the Taliban’s recent policies on media and political programming. On Friday, July 4th, Bennett shared a statement on X, highlighting the severe restrictions now imposed on Afghanistan media, which were already under tight control by the Taliban.

Bennett described these developments as a troubling sign for press freedom in Afghanistan, marking another dark day for independent journalism in the country. He emphasized that the new policy further entrenches censorship and authoritarianism, limiting the ability of the media to report freely and objectively.

In a bid to tighten its grip on political discourse, the Ministry of Information and Culture issued a new directive titled “Policy for Hosting Political Programs (Panels) in Afghanistan.” The new policy requires media outlets to submit their political programs for approval before they can be aired, thereby stifling independent reporting and curbing freedom of expression.

The Freedom of Expression Center has strongly condemned this directive, describing it as a wide-reaching assault on media freedoms. They warned that these restrictions severely undermine the already fragile state of media independence, making it increasingly difficult for journalists to operate freely.

The new restrictions imposed by the Taliban mark a further escalation in the suppression of press freedom in Afghanistan. These policies are expected to limit the ability of media outlets to engage in independent reporting and political discourse.

The international community must closely observe Afghanistan’s evolving media landscape. The continued erosion of press freedoms poses a serious threat not only to Afghanistan society but also to global human rights standards. As the Taliban intensifies its control over the media, concerns about the country’s future as a free and open society grow.

Richard Bennett expresses concern over Media Restrictions in Afghanistan
read more

Islamic Emirate Urges Other Nations to Follow Russia’s Lead

The flag of the Islamic Emirate was raised over the Afghan embassy, an action that followed Russia’s official recognition of the Islamic Emirate nearly four years after its establishment. With this decision, Russia became the first country to officially recognize the Islamic Emirate.

The Kremlin announced that the decision was fundamentally made by Russian President Vladimir Putin, based on the recommendation of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Russia’s ambassador to Kabul, Dmitry Zhirnov, stated: “This decision, fundamentally made by the President of Russia and based on the recommendation of the Foreign Minister, shows our genuine interest in a full partnership with Afghanistan. Over 100 years ago, Russia was the first country to recognize Afghanistan’s independence. All of this reflects our friendly relations with Afghanistan.”

The acting Foreign Minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, praised the move and described it as an important step toward strengthening bilateral relations.

Russia is among the few countries that maintained an active embassy in Kabul following the fall of the former government.

In addition, the removal of Emirate officials’ names from sanctions lists and the acceptance of the Islamic Emirate’s proposed ambassador in Moscow are among the recent steps Russia has taken to expand its relations with the Emirate.

Islamic Emirate officials have repeatedly referred to China and Russia as their allies in the United Nations Security Council.

Political analyst Mohammad Aslam Danishmal stated: “To gain international legitimacy, the Islamic Emirate must fulfill its internal responsibilities. Based on that, the path will be paved. Just as Russia recognized the Emirate, other countries should follow suit.”

Most Western countries have so far refrained from recognizing the Islamic Emirate due to concerns over human rights, particularly the situation of women and girls.

Meanwhile, attention is now focused on the reactions of other countries and international institutions to determine whether Russia’s decision will initiate a new path toward global recognition of the caretaker government.

Islamic Emirate Urges Other Nations to Follow Russia’s Lead
read more

Afghan refugees stuck in Pakistan as Germany halts entry programme

By  and 

However, a year later, in Islamabad, Kimia remains stuck in limbo.
Afghan refugees stuck in Pakistan as Germany halts entry program
  • Thousands of Afghans stuck in Pakistan in limbo
  • Germany says intends to halt humanitarian migration programmes
BERLIN/ISLAMABAD, July 3 (Reuters) – In a cramped guesthouse in Pakistan’s capital, 25-year-old Kimia spends her days sketching women — dancing, playing, resisting —in a notebook that holds what’s left of her hopes.
A visual artist and women’s rights advocate, she fled Afghanistan in 2024 after being accepted on to a German humanitarian admission program aimed at Afghans considered at risk under the Taliban.

Thousands of kilometres away in Germany, an election in February where migration dominated public debate and a change of government in May resulted in the gradual suspension of the programme.

Now the new centre-right coalition intends to close it.
The situation echoes that of nearly 1,660 Afghans cleared to settle in the United States, but who then found themselves in limbo in January after U.S. President Donald Trump took office and suspended refugee programmes.
Kimia’s interview at the German embassy which she hoped would result in a flight to the country and the right to live there, was abruptly cancelled in April. Meanwhile, Germany pays for her room, meals and medical care in Islamabad.
“We just want to find a place that is calm and safe,” she said of herself and the other women at the guesthouse.
The admission programme began in October 2022, intending to bring up to 1,000 Afghans per month to Germany who were deemed at risk because of their work in human rights, justice, politics or education, or due to their gender, religion or sexual orientation.
However, fewer than 1,600 arrived in over two years due to holdups and the cancellation of flights.
Today, around 2,400 Afghans are waiting to travel to Germany, the German foreign ministry said. Whether they will is unclear. NGOs say 17,000 more are in the early stages of selection and application under the now dormant scheme.
The foreign ministry said entry to Germany through the program was suspended pending a government review, and the government will continue to care for and house those already in the program.
It did not answer Reuters’ questions on the number of cancelled interviews, or how long the suspension would last.
Reuters spoke with eight Afghans living in Pakistan and Germany, migration lawyers and advocacy groups, who described the fate of the programme as part of a broader curb on Afghan asylum claims in Germany and an assumption that Sunni men in particular are not at risk under the Taliban.
The German government says there is no specific policy of reducing the number of Afghan migrants. However, approval rates for Afghan asylum applicants dropped to 52% in early 2025, down from 74% in 2024, according to the Federal Migration Office (BAMF).

POLITICAL SHIFT

Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021. Since May 2021 Germany has admitted about 36,500 vulnerable Afghans by various pathways including former local staff, the government said.
Thorsten Frei, chief of staff to Germany’s new chancellor Friedrich Merz, said humanitarian migration has now reached levels that “exceed the integration capacity of society.”
“As long as we have irregular and illegal migration to Germany, we simply cannot implement voluntary admission programs.”
The interior ministry said programs like the one for Afghans will be phased out and they are reviewing how to do so.
Several Afghans are suing the government over the suspension. Matthias Lehnert, a lawyer representing them, said Germany could not simply suspend their admissions without certain conditions such as the person no longer being at risk.
Since former chancellor Angela Merkel opened Germany’s borders in 2015 to over a million refugees, public sentiment has shifted, partly as a result of several deadly attacks by asylum seekers. The far-right Alternative for Germany party (AfD), capitalising on the anti-migrant sentiment, surged to a historic second-place finish in February’s election.
Afghans Reuters spoke with said they feared they were being unfairly associated with the perpetrators, and this was putting their own lives at risk if they had to return to Afghanistan.
“I’m so sorry about those people who are injured or killed … but it’s not our fault,” Kimia said.
Afghan Mohammad Mojib Razayee, 30, flew to Germany from Cyprus in March under a European Union voluntary solidarity mechanism, after a year of waiting with 100 other refugees. He said he was at risk after criticising the Taliban. Two weeks after seeking asylum in Berlin, his application was rejected.
He was shocked at the ruling. BAMF found no special protection needs in his case, a spokesperson said.
“It’s absurd — but not surprising. The decision-making process is simply about luck, good or bad,” said Nicolas Chevreux, a legal advisor with AWO counseling center in Berlin.
Chevreux said he believes Afghan asylum cases have been handled differently since mid-2024, after a mass stabbing at a rally in the city of Mannheim, in which six people were injured and a police officer was killed. An Afghan asylum seeker was charged and is awaiting trial.

‘YOU DON’T LIVE’

Spending most days in her room, surrounded by English and German textbooks, Kimia says returning to Afghanistan is unthinkable. Her art could make her a target.
“If I go back, I can’t follow my dreams – I can’t work, I can’t study. It’s like you just breathe, but you don’t live.”
Under Taliban rule, women are banned from most public life, face harassment by morality police if unaccompanied by a male guardian, and must follow strict dress codes, including face coverings. When security forces raided homes, Kimia said, she would frantically hide her artwork.
The Taliban say they respect women’s rights in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic law and local culture and that they are not targeting former foes.
Hasseina, is a 35-year-old journalist and women’s rights activist from Kabul who fled to Pakistan and was accepted as an applicant on to the German programme.
Divorced and under threat from both the Taliban and her ex-husband’s family, who she says have threatened to kill her and take her daughter, she said returning is not an option.
The women are particularly alarmed as Pakistan is intensifying efforts to forcibly return Afghans. The country says its crackdown targets all undocumented foreigners for security reasons. Pakistan’s foreign ministry did not respond to request for comment on how this affects Afghans awaiting German approval.
The German foreign ministry has said it is aware of two families promised admission to Germany who were detained for deportation, and it was working with Pakistan authorities to stop this.
Marina, 25, fled Afghanistan after being separated from her family. Her mother, a human rights lawyer, was able to get to Germany. Marina has been waiting in Pakistan to follow her for nearly two years with her baby.
“My life is stuck, I want to go to Germany, I want to work, I want to contribute. Here I am feeling so useless,” she said.

Reporting by Riham Alkousaa and Charlotte Greenfield; Additional reporting by Mohammad Yunus Yawar; editing by Matthias Williams, Alexandra Hudson

Afghan refugees stuck in Pakistan as Germany halts entry programme
read more

Pakistan’s army says it killed 30 fighters trying to cross Afghan border

Al Jazeera

Pakistan’s army has said it has killed 30 fighters who tried to cross the border from Afghanistan, just days after a suicide attack in the same region killed 16 Pakistani soldiers.

The fighters, who all died in the last three days, belonged to the Pakistan Taliban or its affiliates, according to the Pakistani military, which praised its troops for preventing “a potential catastrophe” on Friday.

One faction of the Pakistan Taliban, which is a separate group from the Afghan Taliban, claimed responsibility for a suicide blast last week in the border district of North Waziristan in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

The Pakistani army’s killing of the fighters took place in the same district.

Although a statement from the country’s military did not give details about its operation against the fighters, it confirmed that it had seized a “large quantity of weapons, ammunition and explosives”.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif praised his country’s security forces on Friday for “thwarting an infiltration attempt”.

“We are determined to completely eliminate all forms of terrorism from the country,” his office said.

Both the prime minister and the army’s statements blamed India for backing the fighters.

Although New Delhi is yet to comment on the latest accusation, it has repeatedly denied claims from Islamabad that it is fomenting violence in Pakistan.

Pakistan map
(Al Jazeera)

Such accusations have increased in recent months as tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours have soared.

During a four-day conflict between them in May, 70 people on both sides were killed, and the regional foes were on the cusp of their fifth all-out war since independence.

The fighting broke out after India accused Pakistan of supporting gunmen who killed 26 people in the disputed Kashmir region on April 22. Islamabad denied any involvement.

Violence in Pakistan’s border areas has spiked since the Taliban seized power again in Afghanistan, in 2021, with last year the deadliest in a decade.

Pakistan’s government increased defence spending by 20% in June, with 14% of the country’s overall budget assigned to the army.

Source: Al Jazeera and news agencies
Pakistan’s army says it killed 30 fighters trying to cross Afghan border
read more

Pentagon to Begin Review of America’s 20-Year War in Afghanistan

The aim of this review is to extract key lessons from the wars in Afghanistan and Vietnam to avoid repeating past mistakes.

Four years after the controversial withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, the Pentagon has launched a new review of the two-decade-long war in the country. The aim of this review is to extract key lessons from the wars in Afghanistan and Vietnam to avoid repeating past mistakes.

Sean Parnell, spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Defense, confirmed that a special investigative team will officially begin work in July to examine the consequences of America’s 20-year military presence in Afghanistan.

The Pentagon spokesperson stated: “So, the question that I have here and that the department has, is what happened? Like, how do we as a department make sure that something like in Vietnam, and something there again that happened in Afghanistan, never happens again? Helicopters and embassies in Vietnam, helicopters and embassies and in Afghanistan, it’s just not the desired end state that we were looking for in those conflicts.”

He added that the assessment will be conducted on three levels: tactical, strategic, and even presidential.

Experts believe this process could influence the future direction of U.S. policy regarding military interventions.

Fazl-ur-Rahman Oria, a political analyst, said: “Now that the U.S. is reviewing its two-decade military presence and failure in Afghanistan, this is a positive step. It serves as a valuable lesson for the U.S. to avoid using force and violence against Afghans in the future and instead engage in political and economic interactions with Afghanistan.”

Sadiq Shinwari, a military analyst, commented: “The United States and NATO made mistakes in Afghanistan over the past two decades. To rectify those errors, they can now choose the path of dialogue.”

So far, the interim government in Afghanistan has not issued an official response to the investigation. However, as the review begins, global discussions continue regarding the U.S. role in the 2021 developments from the Doha Agreement with the Islamic Emirate to the swift collapse of the previous Afghan government.

Pentagon to Begin Review of America’s 20-Year War in Afghanistan
read more

Russia Becomes First Country to Recognize Afghanistan’s Taliban Government

Afghanistan has remained largely isolated since the Taliban seized power nearly four years ago, despite subtle signs of increased cooperation with countries like China and India.

Russia on Thursday became the first country to recognize the Taliban government as the legitimate authority in Afghanistan, a major step in the militant group’s efforts to engage with the world nearly four years after it seized power and declared victory in its war against the United States.

Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry said on X that Russia’s ambassador to Afghanistan, Dmitry Zhirnov, had “officially conveyed his government’s decision to recognize the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan” during a meeting in Kabul with the country’s foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said Moscow’s official recognition of the government in Afghanistan would “give impetus to the development of productive bilateral cooperation between our countries in various fields,” including in trade and energy.

Russia’s move is a significant victory for the Taliban, whose draconian restrictions on women, including bans on education beyond the sixth grade and on medical training, have made Afghanistan a pariah state in much of the world.Both Western and Islamic nations condemned the Taliban and kept a distance from them, despite widespread outreach efforts by the group. The Taliban moved to eradicate opium production and took other steps in a bid to present a more moderate face, but most foreign partners remained unmoved.

That began to change last year, however, as a growing recognition set in that the Taliban government was not going anywhere and that no amount of international pressure would force it to back down on women’s rights.

Diplomatic activity picked up in the second half of 2024, with delegations discussing trade and investment deals with the Taliban, and signs of cooperation have continued this year. China vowed to extend a China-Pakistan economic corridor to Afghanistan, and India resumed granting visas to Afghan citizens.

The United States, whose 20-year war with the Taliban ended with a chaotic pullout in August 2021, has signaled no willingness to recognize the Taliban. The U.S. government continues to draw a red line with the Taliban over the treatment of women, even as America’s rivals look to capitalize on openings with Afghanistan.

Other Western governments are also keeping the Taliban at arm’s length, but Germany’s interior minister said on Wednesday that the German government needed to strike a deal with the Taliban to facilitate the deportations of Afghan citizens on German soil.

Russia’s recognition of the Taliban government caps months of expanding relations between the two governments, including on humanitarian aid and counterterrorism.

In April, Russia’s top court removed the Taliban from its list of terrorist organizations, more than 20 years after it had first been given the label.

Russian officials said that the removal would allow closer security cooperation against the Islamic State-Khorasan, a branch of the Islamic State that is active in Afghanistan.

The group, known as ISIS-K, killed more than 130 people last year at a concert hall outside Moscow, in the deadliest terrorist attack in Russia since President Vladimir V. Putin took power a quarter century ago. ISIS-K also attacked the Russian Embassy in Kabul in 2022.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said it would seek to increase cooperation in the fields of energy, transport, agriculture and infrastructure. Iran, the United Arab Emirates, China and Pakistan are Afghanistan’s top trading partners.

Mr. Muttaqi, Afghanistan’s foreign minister, said of Russia’s recognition of the Taliban, “We hope other countries will also use this opportunity and recognize the Islamic Emirate.”

Safiullah Padshah contributed reporting.

Russia Becomes First Country to Recognize Afghanistan’s Taliban Government
read more

UN Warns: Drought worsens across Afghanistan

Khaama Press

The UN reports a rapidly spreading drought across Afghanistan, causing crop failures, livestock deaths, and urgent need for humanitarian aid.

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has issued a stark warning about the worsening drought in Afghanistan, noting that the northern, northwestern, and northeastern provinces are the most severely affected. These regions, already vulnerable due to economic challenges, are now facing increasing agricultural devastation due to prolonged dry conditions.

Significant crop losses have been reported, and livestock deaths are rising across the affected provinces. Although FAO has not provided specific figures, it confirmed that the situation is deteriorating rapidly, threatening the livelihoods of farming and herding communities who depend heavily on seasonal rains and water sources.

In a recent update posted on X, FAO stressed the urgent need for humanitarian assistance. Affected communities are in immediate need of cash aid and veterinary support to preserve their remaining livestock, which form the economic backbone for many rural families.

To combat the crisis, FAO announced it is stepping up its relief efforts across the hardest-hit areas. Emergency programs are being expanded to support both crop producers and livestock owners, aiming to prevent further food insecurity and economic collapse in rural Afghanistan.

The escalating drought comes at a time when Afghanistan is already dealing with widespread poverty, political instability, and limited access to global aid. Without swift international intervention, experts warn that the crisis may spiral into a major humanitarian disaster, with food shortages, displacement, and long-term developmental setbacks.

Humanitarian agencies are calling on global donors to increase funding and technical support to Afghanistan’s agriculture sector. Only through timely and coordinated action can further loss of life and livelihoods be prevented.

UN Warns: Drought worsens across Afghanistan
read more