Taliban Expands Ties with India, While Accusing Pakistan of Bombing Afghanistan

India and the Taliban government in Afghanistan announced expanded diplomatic ties on Friday, after the sides held their most high-powered talks in the four years since Taliban forces overran the U.S.-backed republic in Kabul, which New Delhi had supported.

India said it will re-establish its embassy in Kabul, but while the move elevates diplomatic relations with India to their highest level in decades, it appeared to fall short of a formal recognition of the Taliban government.

In a sign of escalating geopolitical tensions and intrigue, the announcement came on a day the Taliban’s defense ministry accused India’s archnemesis Pakistan, which had provided the group support during its insurgency against the U.S. force, of carrying out airstrikes in the Afghan territory along the border as well as “breaching the skies” of Kabul.

Observers saw in the Taliban defense ministry’s careful language a confirmation of reports that Pakistani airstrikes had been behind the explosions reported in central Kabul late on Thursday. On social media, there were suggestions, including by former Afghan President Hamid Karzai and a former senior American official, that the explosions were the result of airstrikes by Pakistan’s military.

Pakistan’s government has waged a nearly two-decade fight against militants of the banned group Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, also known as the T.T.P. or Pakistani Taliban. Pakistan has said that the group is planning renewed attacks from sanctuaries across the border in Afghanistan with assistance from India’s intelligence service. Afghan officials have denied the charge.

Pakistan’s government has been under pressure after two recent deadly attacks in the country, the latest killing a dozen soldiers this week. In a statement on Friday, Pakistan’s military said it had conducted “a series of retribution operations” but did not say where. But Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, a spokesman for the Pakistani military who was addressing a news conference, declined to say whether that included the strike in Kabul.

The meeting in New Delhi between Amir Khan Muttaqi, Taliban’s foreign minister, and his Indian counterpart, S. Jaishankar, is the highest level engagement between the two sides in decades.

As they sat down for talks, Mr. Jaishankar said India was elevating its mission in Kabul to the level of an embassy. India’s embassy in Kabul had been shut in the 1990s, but has been open during the past four years, albeit at a reduced capacity.

The Indian foreign minister also said India was expanding its development aid to Afghanistan and would increase the number of visas issued to Afghans, which it had only recently resumed issuing, in small numbers. As part of the aid expansion, Mr. Jaishankar listed India’s plans to build shelters for refugees forcibly returned to Afghanistan from Pakistan and Iran.

“We will not allow any group to threaten others from the Afghan soil, or to use Afghan soil against others,” Mr. Muttaqi said.

Neither of the leaders addressed the Taliban government’s record on human rights, particularly the regime’s ban on girls’ education beyond 6th grade.

Escalating tensions in the region, which are testing loyalties and redrawing relationships, hung heavily over the meeting.

India and Pakistan, the nuclear-armed neighbors, fought a short military conflict earlier this year. Pakistan’s relations with the Taliban, a group it had long nurtured with safe havens during its two-decade insurgency in Afghanistan, have also plummeted in the years the insurgents retook power in Kabul. There have been violent clashes between the countries — a deterioration that analysts say New Delhi is working to exploit.

If Pakistan did strike Kabul, it would be a major escalation — and the timing would be likely to send a message to the Taliban leadership that a closer relationship with India would not be tolerated.

In a press engagement with a handful of Indian reporters later in the day, Mr. Muttaqi said reports of what had caused the explosion in Kabul were still being assessed, but he confirmed the airstrikes along the border in Paktika.

“This is a big mistake of the Pakistan government,” Mr. Muttaqi said. “You can’t solve issues like this, and Afghanistan’s history shows that.”

He said anyone who tries to use force against Afghanistan should ask “the British, the Soviets, the Americans, and NATO” how that ended.

India has warmed toward the Taliban government in recent years. But during the movement’s rule in Afghanistan during the 1990s and its two-decade insurgency against the Afghan government and its American backers, relations were much cooler. That was in part because of two incidents that remain politically sensitive for Indians: India accused the Taliban of sheltering hijackers who seized an Indian plane in 1999 and landed it in southern Afghanistan, and of conducting a terrorist attack against India’s diplomatic mission in Kabul in 2008 that killed dozens, including four Indian officials.

There was no direct acknowledgment of these two episodes in the public statements by the Indian and Afghan foreign ministers on Friday.

“During the 20-year struggle against the U.S. occupation, there were many ups and downs,” Mr. Muttaqi said. “But not once did we give a statement against India. Instead, we always sought good relations with India.”

Salman Masood, Elian Peltier, and Safiullah Padshah contributed reporting.

Mujib Mashal is the South Asia bureau chief for The Times, helping to lead coverage of India and the diverse region around it, including Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bhutan.

Taliban Expands Ties with India, While Accusing Pakistan of Bombing Afghanistan
read more

Deported Afghans Face Hardship After Returning Empty-Handed from Iran

According to them, all their belongings remain in Iran, and they have returned to the country empty-handed.

A number of Afghan migrants recently deported from Iran have expressed concerns over extreme poverty and severe economic challenges.

Abdul Ahad, one of these migrants, was deported from Iran along with his family nearly three months ago. The 66-year-old man, who is the breadwinner of a family of five, says he now lives in a rented house in Herat city and struggles with many hardships.

He added: “I was deported from Iran, and here I have neither a job nor any capital. My life is full of misery. My young children are sick, I am also ill and taking medicine. We are living through very difficult times.”

Many of these deported migrants, who came here hoping to receive assistance, share similar concerns. They say all their possessions are left behind in Iran, and they now face serious difficulties living back in Afghanistan.

Abdullah Mirzai, another deported migrant, says: “Our household items were left in Iran. I ask the government to help us buy the necessary home items or to help us transport our belongings from Iran.”

Sayed Mohammad Hossaini, another deported migrant, says: “Winter and the cold season are approaching, but we have neither heaters nor fuel. We lack basic household items, mattresses, blankets, and food. We really don’t know which problem to talk about first.”

Abdullah Samim, head of one of the aid organizations, says: “The majority of our compatriots who have returned from neighboring countries are needy and deserving of assistance.”

Local officials in Herat also say that many of the deported migrants’ belongings remain in Iran. They assure that the Islamic Emirate is in discussions with the Iranian government to facilitate the return of these assets.

Ahmadullah Muttaqi, head of Information and Culture in Herat, said: “Afghans who had lived in Iran for years, who had businesses, homes, and even industrial factories or mortgaged houses, were arrested and deported from the roadside without any chance to collect their belongings. This is a serious challenge for Afghan migrants in Iran.”

According to statistics from Herat’s local authorities, in the past three months, around 1.12 million Afghan migrants have been deported by the Iranian government and entered Afghanistan through the Islam Qala border.

The belongings and properties of most of these migrants remain in Iran, and they have returned home empty-handed.

Deported Afghans Face Hardship After Returning Empty-Handed from Iran
read more

Russia and Tajikistan Discuss Afghanistan’s Future in Key Bilateral Talks

It is worth noting that Russia is the first country to have officially recognized the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

The presidents of Russia and Tajikistan held talks on Afghanistan during their recent meeting.

According to a report by RIA Novosti, Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized the need for an independent and terrorism-free Afghanistan during his discussions with Tajik President Emomali Rahmon.

Enayatullah Hamam, a political analyst, commented: “Afghanistan is considered a key part of the security architecture of Central Asia and the Indian subcontinent. Therefore, all regional concerns are focused on this country.”

While the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has not yet commented on the matter, it has consistently stated that Afghanistan seeks peace and stability and that no threats will arise from its territory toward neighboring countries.

Khushhal Hasan Ahmadzai, another political analyst, said: “The Russians also take a strategic and long-term view of Afghanistan, particularly because Russia was the first country to officially recognize the Islamic Emirate.”

These discussions come as Russia recently hosted the seventh meeting of the Moscow Format, which included representatives from several countries — among them, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

It is worth noting that Russia is the first country to have officially recognized the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

Russia and Tajikistan Discuss Afghanistan’s Future in Key Bilateral Talks
read more

Russia Issues Afghanistan Warning After Trump Says US Wants Bagram Air Base

By

Breaking News Editor

Newsweek

October 7, 2025

Russia warned Tuesday that it would consider any new foreign military presence in Afghanistan or nearby countries “categorically unacceptable,” delivering the message during a high-level meeting in Moscow that included Afghanistan’s Taliban government.

Why It Matters

The statement came weeks after President Donald Trump said the United States was exploring options to retake Bagram Air Base, the massive military complex abandoned during the chaotic 2021 withdrawal of U.S. and NATO forces.

What To Know

At the opening of the international conference, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov praised the Taliban for its efforts to fight Islamic State militants and curb narcotics trafficking but made clear Moscow’s red line against renewed U.S. military involvement in the region.

“The deployment of military infrastructure of any third countries on the territory of Afghanistan, as well as on the territories of neighboring states, is categorically unacceptable under any pretext,” Lavrov said. He warned that any “extra-regional military presence” would only bring new instability, adding that Afghanistan’s history “should have taught everyone the right lessons long ago.”

Newsweek has reached out to the State Department via email on Tuesday afternoon for comment.

Afghanistan’s Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, left, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov arrive to pose for a photo prior to their talks 

Russia’s position reflects deep sensitivities shaped by its own history in Afghanistan. The former Soviet Union fought a decade-long war there before withdrawing its troops in 1989, a conflict that left tens of thousands dead and contributed to the USSR’s eventual collapse. Since the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, Moscow has sought to strengthen ties with Kabul while asserting itself as a key power broker in Central Asia.

In July, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban government, removing it from its list of banned organizations. At Tuesday’s talks, Lavrov said Moscow wanted to expand business and energy cooperation with Afghanistan and deepen joint efforts against terrorism and drug trafficking. He also condemned Western sanctions and the ongoing freeze of Afghanistan’s foreign assets, calling those measures “hostile and counterproductive.”

Representatives from China, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan also attended the Moscow gathering, which focused on regional security and economic development. The talks come as the Taliban, still largely isolated on the world stage, continues to seek legitimacy despite widespread condemnation of its treatment of women and girls.

Since seizing power, the Taliban has reimposed many of the restrictions that defined its earlier rule from 1996 to 2001. Women are barred from most jobs and public spaces, including schools, gyms and parks, while girls are prohibited from education beyond the sixth grade. Those policies remain a major obstacle to broader recognition — even as Afghanistan again becomes a stage for global competition over influence and access.

What People Are Saying

Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, who led the Taliban delegation, praised Moscow’s diplomatic outreach: “We appreciate the bold move of the Russian Federation to officially recognize the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,” he said. “We wish that all countries follow the same path.” Muttaqi added that his government has created “a good opportunity for investment, economy, transit and connectivity” after decades of conflict and instability.

U.S. President Donald Trump said: “If Afghanistan doesn’t give Bagram Airbase back to those that built it, the United States of America, BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN!!!”

What Happens Next

The dispute over Bagram is expected to remain unresolved, with the Taliban holding firm and the U.S. weighing its options. The standoff is likely to influence U.S.-Afghan relations and broader regional dynamics, particularly regarding strategic interests in South and Central Asia.

This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.

 

Russia Issues Afghanistan Warning After Trump Says US Wants Bagram Air Base
read more

UN to investigate suspected abuses in Afghanistan 

By

Reuters

  • Investigation’s scope includes the Taliban and foreign troops
  • Trump opposed to ‘unlawful jurisdiction’ over US forces
  • China voices doubts over the investigation
GENEVA, Oct 6 (Reuters) – The United Nations Human Rights Council is to investigate abuses in Afghanistan, which could eventually enable criminal investigations into suspected violations by both the Taliban and foreign troops, including those from the United States.
The United States, which had troops in Afghanistan until 2021 within a NATO coalition, has previously opposed scrutiny of its actions, for example, by the International Criminal Court, but backed research into suspected Taliban violations.
President Donald Trump has disengaged from the Geneva rights council and did not take a stance in the negotiations on the EU proposal for the investigation, diplomats said.
However, a State Department spokesperson said late on Sunday, before it was adopted on Monday without a vote: “Under the leadership of President Trump, the United States government will not tolerate international organizations that attempt to exert unlawful jurisdiction over American troops.”

NO TIME LIMIT ON PROBE

The European Union motion calls for investigators to prepare evidence for future court proceedings and is among the strongest form of U.N. rights probe, on a par with existing investigations into suspected crimes in Syria and Myanmar.
For years, both Afghan and international rights groups have sought such a probe. Calls have become louder as the Taliban tightened restrictions on women and freedom of expression.
The Taliban authorities say they respect rights in line with their interpretation of Islamic law.
While the EU proposal for an investigation did not specifically mention abuses by international troops, it is described as “comprehensive” and has no time limit, meaning it could address these, diplomats said. The exact scope will be determined when investigators are appointed.
Investigations launched by the 47-member council can lead to war crimes prosecutions. Some countries which sent troops to Afghanistan, such as Britain and Australia, have initiated inquiries but prosecutions have been rare.
Fereshta Abbasi, Afghanistan researcher at Human Rights Watch, called the launch a “significant step that could break a decades-long cycle of impunity”.
The new investigation would cooperate with an existing ICC probe. The ICC has previously indicated it would deprioritise suspected crimes by U.S. forces after Trump imposed sanctions in 2020 over its Afghanistan work.
China’s delegate Wang Nian criticised the proposal’s cost of $9.2 million over three years amid a U.N. funding crisis and said it was unbalanced.
UN to investigate suspected abuses in Afghanistan 
read more

World Bank Says Afghanistan’s Modest Economic Growth Overshadowed by Rising Poverty and Fragility

World Bank on glass building

The World Bank says Afghanistan’s economy shows modest growth, but rising poverty, weak governance, and declining aid continue to threaten long-term stability and recovery.

The World Bank has reported that Afghanistan’s economy shows modest signs of recovery, but deep poverty, displacement, and a fragile humanitarian situation continue to threaten the country’s stability. The findings are part of its latest Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, and Pakistan Economic Update, titled “Jobs and Women: Untapped Talent, Unrealized Growth.”

According to the report, Afghanistan’s gross domestic product (GDP) is projected to grow by about 4.3% in fiscal years 2025–2026, driven largely by household and public consumption. Yet, with the population expected to rise by 8.6%, per capita income is forecast to decline by nearly 4%, keeping millions of Afghans in extreme poverty.

The World Bank estimates that between 15.2 and 23.8 million Afghans — almost half the population — live on less than $3 a day, one of the highest poverty rates in the region. The Bank attributes this to overlapping crises, including forced returns of refugees, natural disasters, and weak governance. Since September 2023, more than 4 million Afghans have returned from Pakistan and Iran, with 2.1 million repatriated between January and July 2025, most involuntarily.

The report notes that the August 2025 earthquake in eastern Afghanistan, which killed more than 2,000 people, deepened economic distress. Damages were estimated at $183 million, roughly 1% of GDP, destroying homes, livestock, and vital rural infrastructure. The disaster underscored the country’s limited ability to respond to crises amid declining international aid.

On gender and employment, the World Bank says Afghanistan remains one of the world’s most restrictive environments for women. Social barriers, conflict, and policy restrictions have forced most women into low-paid, informal work. Although women’s participation in the labor force slightly increased between 2020 and 2023, nearly 60% remain inactive, and most new opportunities are in precarious home-based sectors.

Regionally, the World Bank forecasts modest economic growth of 2.8% in 2025 and 3.3% in 2026 for the broader Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, and Pakistan region. However, Afghanistan’s recovery remains uncertain due to sanctions, weak governance, and the absence of international recognition. The sharp reduction in aid, the Bank warns, has already led to the closure of hundreds of health centers, depriving millions of essential services.

Roberta Gatti, the World Bank’s Chief Economist for the region, said increasing women’s participation in the workforce could raise per capita GDP by 20–30% in countries like Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan. Osman Dione, the Bank’s Vice President for the region, called for “bold and comprehensive reforms” to remove structural barriers and empower women economically.

The report concludes that Afghanistan’s outlook remains fragile despite limited growth. “Humanitarian needs are rising rapidly while domestic capacity to respond is severely constrained,” it said. “Without structural reforms and inclusive policies, millions of Afghans — especially women and returning refugees — will remain trapped in poverty.”

World Bank Says Afghanistan’s Modest Economic Growth Overshadowed by Rising Poverty and Fragility
read more

Consequences of the United States’ 20-Year Presence in Afghanistan

After 20 years, the threat of terrorism did not end; instead, the emergence of the ISIS-Khorasan group after 2010 created a new wave of violence in the country.

On October 7, 2001, the United States and its NATO allies entered Afghanistan with three main goals: fighting terrorism, combating narcotics, and nation-building. However, after two decades, these slogans faded amid ruins, widespread corruption, and the blood of countless civilians.

The first motive for the U.S. presence in Afghanistan was counterterrorism. Yet, during this campaign, NATO and U.S. forces carried out night bombings that killed thousands of civilians, including women and children, stories of these tragedies continue to this day.

After twenty years, the threat of terrorism did not end; instead, the emergence of the ISIS-Khorasan group after 2010 created a new wave of violence in the country.

Mohammad Amin Karim, a peace studies researcher, said: “The only real achievement of the U.S. presence was the education of a young, skilled generation. However, after the U.S. withdrawal, around 200,000 to 300,000 of these educated youths left the country, people who could have served Afghanistan today.”

The second official U.S. objective was to combat narcotics. This mission also failed. Despite spending millions of dollars, the production and trafficking of drugs not only continued but, in some years,

increased, turning Afghanistan into one of the world’s largest producers of opium.

Kamran Aman, a military affairs expert, noted: “Their main achievement was containing the influence of China, Russia, and Iran in the region, but all the economic, moral, and human losses fell upon the Afghan people.”

Nation-building and establishing a stable government was the third U.S. goal, but it became the most unsuccessful part of its mission. Widespread corruption, heavy dependency on foreign aid, and deep political divisions led to the collapse of the 20-year republic. As a result, America’s slogan of nation-building ended in complete failure.

Mohammad Omar Nahzat, a political analyst, said: “They only tried to impose populist ideas to deceive people, while their real agenda was geopolitical, aimed at limiting China’s and Russia’s regional influence.”

In total, during two decades of U.S. presence in Afghanistan, more than 150,000 people lost their lives, including foreign troops, Afghan soldiers, and civilians. Among them were over 3,500 foreign troops, 66,000 Afghan security forces, and more than 51,000 Afghan civilians and fighters.

It is worth noting that during these twenty years, the U.S. spent more than 2.2 trillion dollars in Afghanistan.

Consequences of the United States’ 20-Year Presence in Afghanistan
read more

Moscow Format Discusses Afghanistan’s Political and Economic Future

Representatives from Afghanistan, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, China, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan attended the meeting.

The 7th consultative meeting of the Moscow Format on Afghanistan, focusing on national reconciliation and regional cooperation in political and economic fields, was hosted by Russia today (Tuesday).

Representatives from Afghanistan, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, China, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan attended the meeting.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, in his opening remarks, emphasized the importance of stability and security in the region and warned against the presence of non-regional military forces on Afghan soil, calling it a threat to regional peace and development.

He stated: “We emphasize that over the past four years, the Islamic Emirate’s government has become stronger and is now governing the country with greater confidence and stability. We must acknowledge that despite difficult conditions, Kabul’s leadership has managed to perform effectively to a great extent.”

Islamic Emirate’s Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi expressed appreciation for Russia’s move to recognize the Islamic Emirate, stressing that Afghanistan has now transformed from a security challenge into a partner for regional stability and an opportunity for economic growth.

Without naming any specific country, Muttaqi said some parties, instead of recognizing the peace and stability achieved in Afghanistan, are trying to portray the country as a regional threat.

“Our view is that this positive transformation should be better supported and managed so that past mistakes are not repeated. Our region must not once again fall victim to insecurity caused by miscalculations and flawed policies of the past,” he added.

On the sidelines of the meeting, the foreign ministers of Afghanistan and Russia met to discuss strengthening political ties, expanding economic cooperation, and addressing regional issues.

Muttaqi said: “After Russia’s recognition of Afghanistan, unprecedented opportunities for developing political, economic, and other relations have emerged, and we can now move forward with genuine cooperation in various areas.”

Lavrov stated: “We can see how your government is working to stabilize the situation in the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.”

A quadrilateral meeting between Russia, Iran, China, and Pakistan was also held on the sidelines, where the participants emphasized support for Afghanistan and joint cooperation in combating terrorism.

In a joint statement, the Moscow Format member states reaffirmed their support for Afghanistan as an independent, united, and peaceful state.

The parties also called for strengthening cooperation in the fight against terrorism at both bilateral and multilateral levels, stressing that Afghanistan should be supported in taking comprehensive measures to eliminate terrorism within a short period.

Moscow Format Discusses Afghanistan’s Political and Economic Future
read more

Regional powers signal objection to US reclaiming Afghanistan’s Bagram base

By Stephen Quillen and Reuters

Al Jazeera

In a joint statement on Tuesday, members of the Moscow Format of Consultations on Afghanistan – which includes rivals India and Pakistan – “reaffirmed their unwavering support for the establishment of Afghanistan as an independent, united and peaceful state”. The forum also includes Russia, China, Iran and Central Asian nations, all of whom strongly oppose any US return presence in Afghanistan.

The members “called unacceptable the attempts by countries to deploy their military infrastructure in Afghanistan and neighbouring states, since this does not serve the interests of regional peace and stability”.

Though the statement echoes last year’s forum language, it suggests broad regional opposition to Trump’s push to return to Bagram, which he handed over to Afghanistan’s Taliban five years ago as part of a deal paving the way for the US withdrawal from Kabul.

In backing the statement, India – a longtime US partner – navigates fraying ties with Washington and apparent rapprochement with the Taliban, which it long opposed but has in recent years cultivated ties with.

In the latest diplomatic outreach, India is set to welcome the Taliban’s Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi for a historic first visit to New Delhi this week, lasting from October 9-16.

After attending the Moscow forum, Muttaqi emphasised that Afghanistan will not accept any foreign military presence. “Afghanistan is a free and independent country, and throughout history, it has never accepted the military presence of foreigners,” he said. “Our decision and policy will remain the same to keep Afghanistan free and independent.”

Last month, Trump threatened “bad things” would happen to Afghanistan if it did not give back Bagram, and cited what he called its strategic location near China. The Taliban has rejected Trump’s calls to return the base.

Bagram is about 800km (about 500 miles) from the Chinese border, and about 2,400km (about 1,500 miles) from the nearest Chinese missile factory in Xinjiang.

Trump has referred to China as a key reason for wanting to retake control of Bagram, saying last month in London that the base is “an hour away from where [China] makes its nuclear weapons”.

Current and former US officials have cast doubt on Trump’s goal, saying that reoccupying Bagram might end up looking like a reinvasion, requiring more than 10,000 troops as well as the deployment of advanced air defences.

“The sheer logistics of negotiating redeployment and handing back would be extremely challenging and lengthy, and it’s not clear that this would serve either side’s strategic interests,” said Ashley Jackson, co-director at the Geneva-headquartered Centre on Armed Groups.

Bagram, a sprawling complex, was the main base for US forces in Afghanistan during the two decades of war that followed the September 11, 2001, attacks in New York and Washington by al-Qaeda.

Thousands of people were imprisoned at the site for years without charge or trial by US forces during its so-called “war on terror”, and many of them were abused or tortured.

The Taliban retook the facility in 2021 following the US withdrawal, which Trump first set in motion in his first term as president, and the collapse of the Afghan government with Joe Biden in the White House.

Regional powers signal objection to US reclaiming Afghanistan’s Bagram base
read more

Social media content restricted in Afghanistan, Taliban sources confirm

Hafizullah Maroof and Doug Faulkner
BBC News
8 Oct 2025

Restrictions have been placed on content on some social media platforms in Afghanistan, Taliban government sources told BBC Afghan.

Filters have been applied to restrict certain types of content on sites including Facebook, Instagram and X, the sources at the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology said.

It is not clear exactly what sort of posts are subject to filtering. Some social media users in Kabul told the BBC that videos on their Facebook accounts are no longer viewable, while access to Instagram has also been restricted.

These restrictions on social media content come a week after internet and telecommunications services were cut off across the country for two days.

The 48-hour blackout disrupted businesses and flights, limited access to emergency services and raised fears about further isolating women and girls whose rights have been severely eroded since the hardline Islamist group swept back to power in 2021.

Social media users in Afghanistan have been complaining about limited access to different platforms in various provinces since Tuesday.

A Taliban government source said: “Some sort of controls have been applied to restrict certain types of content on platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X.

“We hope this time there wouldn’t be any full ban on internet.

“The filtering is almost applied for the whole county and most provinces are covered now.”

There is no formal explanation from Taliban government officials for the restrictions.

Cybersecurity organisation NetBlocks said “restrictions are now confirmed on multiple providers, the pattern shows an intentional restriction”. Social sites have been intermittently accessible on smartphones, according to news agency AFP.

A man who works in a government office in eastern Nangarhar province told the BBC he could open Facebook but could not see pictures or play videos.

He said the “internet is very slow as a whole”.

Another user in southern Kandahar province, who runs a private business, said his fibre optic internet had been cut off since Tuesday but mobile phone data was working, with Facebook and Instagram being “severely slow”.

The Taliban government has not given an explanation for the total shutdown last week. However, last month, a spokesperson for the Taliban governor in the northern province of Balkh said internet access was being blocked “for the prevention of vices”.

Since returning to power, the Taliban have imposed numerous restrictions in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic Sharia law.

Afghan women have told the BBC that the internet was a lifeline to the outside world since the Taliban banned girls over the age of 12 from receiving an education.

Women’s job options have also been severely restricted and in September, books written by women were removed from universities.

Social media content restricted in Afghanistan, Taliban sources confirm
read more