A senior Taliban minister who expressed support for reversing the ban on girls’ education in Afghanistan appears to have been forced to flee the country.
Speaking at a graduation ceremony in Khost province, near the Afghan-Pakistani border, on 20 January, Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the Taliban’s deputy foreign minister, criticised the government’s ban on girls attending secondary schools and higher education.
“During the time of the prophet Muhammad, the doors of knowledge were open for both men and women,” he said. “There were such remarkable women that if I were to elaborate on their contributions, it would take a considerable amount of time.”
After this speech, and reports of Stanikzai criticising him, the Taliban’s supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, allegedly ordered the minister’s arrest and issued a travel ban, which pushed Stanikzai to leave Afghanistan for the United Arab Emirates.
Since the Taliban’s takeover in 2021, the rights of women and girls to education, work, travel and appearing in public have been severely curtailed.
Last month, the international criminal court’s chief prosecutor requested arrest warrants for the Taliban’s supreme leader and Afghanistan’s chief justice on the grounds that their persecution of women and girls in Afghanistan is a crime against humanity.
Taliban minister ‘forced to flee Afghanistan’ after speech in support of girls’ education
Hundreds of Afghan migrants face uncertainty after the U.S. abruptly shuts down CBP One, canceling asylum appointments and leaving them in legal limbo.
Paul Biasco for Borderless Magazine
Afghans stranded in Mexico due to a shut down on the CPB One app stand for a portrait outside of a mosque in Mexico City on Jan. 31, 2025.
For over seven months, Arian has been patiently waiting in Mexico City.
The former Afghanistan journalist, who is seeking asylum, would log onto CBP One every morning, attempting unsuccessfully to secure a coveted appointment with U.S. immigration officials.
Like thousands of immigrants worldwide, Arian, whose last name is being withheld out of fear, relied on the CBP One program to present his asylum case at the U.S. border. The mobile app offered services such as immigration appointments by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Arian fled his homeland after the Taliban seized power in August 2021, traveling through Iran, Brazil, and the treacherous Darién Gap, hoping to find refuge in the United States.
But on January 20, 2025, his last hope was shattered.
The Trump administration abruptly shut down CBP One’s scheduling function, canceling all pending appointments and leaving tens of thousands of migrants in limbo.
CBP One’s closure has been devastating to many asylum seekers, said Hollie Webb, Supervising Attorney for Al Otro Lado’s Border Rights Project in Tijuana, Mexico. “They never should have been forced to wait for an appointment or use an app in the first place.”
“The US government under both the [President Joe] Biden and Trump administrations has continued to turn away asylum seekers in violation of domestic and international law,” Webb said.
“We waited so long for a legal way to enter the U.S.,” Arian said. “Now, they’ve shut the door on us, and we don’t know what to do.”
A Sudden Policy Shift
In 2023, the Biden administration expanded services provided through CBP One. The mobile app offered a digital lifeline for asylum seekers, allowing them to schedule appointments at select U.S.-Mexico border crossings. According to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, only 1,450 slots were available daily for people to make appointments.
While not without flaws, it provided a structured alternative to more than 904,500 individuals who successfully scheduled appointments from January 2023 through November 2024.
Shortly after taking office, Trump eliminated the app’s functionality, framing it as an abuse of the humanitarian parole system. A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) statement justified the move, saying it would “empower law enforcement” and end the “indiscriminate” entry of migrants.
Antonio Gutierrez, Strategic Coordinator with Organized Communities Against Deportations in Chicago, criticized the move to cancel CBP One.“The cancellation of CBP One will only create more fear, confusion, and discrimination,” Gutierrez said. “Instead of finding safety, asylum seekers are being thrown into a system that thrives on chaos and dehumanization.”
For Afghans like Arian, who fled Taliban persecution, this decision is devastating.
“In Afghanistan, we were journalists, we were advocates, we were military and defense forces,” Arian said. “We didn’t choose to leave. We had to.”
Living in Fear and Uncertainty
Now stranded in Mexico, many Afghan refugees fear being subjected to mistreatment, dangerous conditions, and deportation.
Saboor, another Afghan refugee whose name is changed for safety, described an alleged raid by Mexican state police and national guard that left his family terrified and traumatized.
“They stormed our houses Monday night and separated families,” Saboor said. “We had legal documents [from the Mexican Commission for Refugee Assistance (COMAR)], but they didn’t care. They detained us for hours before transferring us to an immigration shelter.”
Mexico’s Secretary of Defense (SEDENA) did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Last April, several migrants described abuse and robbed by Mexico’s national guard near the U.S. and Mexico border, according to Border Report.
The CBP One cancellation has not only upended months of waiting but has also placed Afghan migrants in extreme financial and psychological distress.
Luis Gomez, director of Psicólogos Sin Fronteras B.C. (Psychologists Without Borders B.C.) in Tijuana, called the policy change “a significant assault on the mental health and well-being of vulnerable individuals and families seeking safety and opportunity.”
“These are not just administrative decisions,” Gomez said. “They have devastating real-life consequences.”
Many, like Yadegari, another Afghan asylum seeker living in Mexico City, spent his life’s savings and the money borrowed to reach the border. Yadegari’s first name is being withheld over safety concerns.
“It took us 40 days to reach Mexico, which wasn’t easy, especially since we had to pass through the Darién Gap with a two-month-old infant,” Yadegari said. He and his family have been in Mexico for over eight months, waiting to make an appointment with the CBP One. “We spent nearly $20,000 just to reach Mexico, thinking that the U.S. could be a new opportunity for us to build our life from scratch.”
Yadegari, who worked for a U.S.-affiliated construction company in Afghanistan, had hoped for protection. Instead, he, along with hundreds of other Afghans, find themselves in a country where they have no legal status, no job opportunities, and very little access to humanitarian aid.
“My family has been suffering here,” he said.
Stranded in Legal Limbo
With CBP One shut down, Afghan asylum seekers now face very limited choices of returning to an uncertain future in Afghanistan, seeking asylum elsewhere, or waiting indefinitely in Mexico. If deported, many women, former government employees, advocates, and those who worked with the U.S. troops fled direct threats from the Taliban and would face imprisonment or death.
“I spent more than a month in Afghanistan after the fall of the government but had to leave due to the number of threats I received,” Arian said. “We walked through Darién Gap with empty stomachs for days, hoping to reach a safer country where we could start from scratch.”
Mexico is home to a small number of Muslims, which is less than 0.01% of the population. The group faces a series of challenges in the country, from language barriers to misconceptions about those who follow a religion with a scant presence in Mexican society.
“They have a very particular situation due to their culture and religion,” Soraya Vazquez of the human rights group Al Otro Lado told Reuters. “There is a lot of stigma against the Muslim community.”
Along with shuttering CBP One, the Trump administration reintroduced the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which forces asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed.
“We call for a more humane and compassionate approach to migration management, one that prioritizes the dignity and human rights of all individuals, including access to mental health support for those affected by these policy changes,” Gomez said.
For Afghans, the option of returning home is non-existent.
William Goodfellow, the director of the Afghanistan Peace Campaign, called for immediate action to help Afghans stranded in Mexico. “By extending the Special Immigrant Visa program, the Trump administration could reward highly-skilled individuals who, in many cases, have risked their lives to advance American interests,” Goodfellow said.
“It would be profoundly unfair to turn our backs on our erstwhile allies, some of whom are still trying to get out of Afghanistan, where their lives are threatened by the Taliban and others who are stranded in third countries,” Goodfellow said.
For now, Afghan asylum seekers remain trapped in limbo. Their dreams of safety have been put on hold, their lives hanging in the balance of shifting U.S. policies.
“We did everything the right way,” Arian said. “We overcame many challenges to get here, only to see the doors shut in our faces.”
Fatema Hosseini is a Roy W. Howard Investigative Reporting fellow covering immigrant communities for Borderless Magazine. Send her an email at fatema@borderlessmag.org.
Stranded in Mexico: Afghan Asylum Seekers in Limbo After CBP One Shutdown
According to Arab News on Tuesday, February 4, Pakistani authorities have threatened to expel Afghans whose immigration cases remain unresolved by host countries. The government insists that delays in processing applications leave thousands in a state of uncertainty.
Islamabad has previously called for an accelerated relocation of Afghan refugees to Western countries. However, despite repeated appeals, progress has been slow, leaving many Afghans stranded and at risk of forced deportation.
Meanwhile, Pakistani police have intensified the expulsion of Afghan refugees, escalating their deportation efforts in recent weeks. Reports indicate that authorities are targeting even those with valid residency documents, disregarding their legal status.
Several Afghan asylum seekers waiting for resettlement in Western countries fear imminent deportation. Many claim they hold official residency permits, yet Pakistani police continue to forcibly remove them, further exacerbating their vulnerable situation.
Pakistan’s forced deportation of Afghan refugees highlights the challenges faced by asylum seekers amid shifting global migration policies. The lack of coordinated efforts between Pakistan and Western nations has left thousands stranded in an increasingly hostile environment.
Trump’s stringent immigration policies and reluctance to expand refugee programs further complicate the crisis. With limited options, Afghan refugees in Pakistan find themselves trapped between a country unwilling to host them and Western nations slow to process their resettlement.
Following the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, tens of thousands of Afghan refugees have sought refuge in Pakistan, hoping for resettlement in Western nations. The prolonged uncertainty has left many in desperate conditions.
Pakistan has urged Western countries to speed up the processing of Afghan refugee applications. Officials warn that without swift action, many refugees awaiting decisions on their status could face deportation.
Members of the High Council of National Resistance for the Salvation of Afghanistan, composed of key leaders from the former government, have stated that they met with an American delegation.
Mohammad Mohaqiq, leader of the Islamic Unity Party of Afghanistan, told Voice of America on Tuesday, February 4, that several members of the High Council of Resistance, including himself, met with a delegation sent by the Global Peace Operations Initiative.
According to him, the American delegation visited them around two days ago to discuss issues related to Afghanistan. The delegation was sent by the Global Peace Operations Initiative for this purpose.
The leader of the Islamic Unity Party added that several members of the High Council of Resistance for the Salvation of Afghanistan, including himself and Marshal Abdul Rashid Dostum, the leader of the National Islamic Movement of Afghanistan, attended the meeting with the American delegation.
He also mentioned that senior advisors from the Global Peace Operations Initiative were part of the delegation, but he did not provide any details regarding the specific topics discussed during their meeting.
Reports suggested that the group had met with a Pakistani delegation, but Mr. Mohaqiq, in an interview with Voice of America, firmly denied any such meeting between the members of the High Council of Resistance and the Pakistani delegation.
US delegation holds talks with Afghanistan’s former leaders in Turkey
According to him, as long as peace, an Islamic system, national unity, and territorial integrity exist, there is no need for such talks.
Mohammad Nabi Omari, the Deputy Minister of Interior, stated at a ceremony in Ghazni that there are no differences among the high-ranking officials of the Islamic Emirate, nor are they divided into factions.
During the introduction ceremony of the new deputy governor of Ghazni, the deputy minister of interior said:”They presented their request and ultimately stated that they wanted a base—whether by request, plea, or force, their forces would be stationed at Bagram Air Base. They said, ‘We do not care about your Islamic system, your enjoining of good and forbidding of evil, or your land.’ Our friends there told them that if a single NATO or American soldier remains in Afghanistan, we will fight them for a hundred years.”
Mohammad Nabi Omari added that during the Doha negotiations, the Islamic Emirate told American officials that even the presence of a single NATO soldier in Afghanistan was unacceptable and that no military base would be granted to the United States.
Regarding this, the deputy minister of interior said:”Do not think this way, do not worry, and do not be influenced by the media claims that suggest there are divisions such as the Kandahar network, the Haqqani network, or the Ghazni network. May God never show us such a situation in life or after death.”
Omari further stated that some political circles, in an attempt to receive dollars from the United States, are trying to force the Islamic Emirate into negotiations. According to him, as long as peace, an Islamic system, national unity, and territorial integrity exist, there is no need for such talks.
Mohammad Nabi Omari continued: “Take a few dollars from America and try to force the Taliban to negotiate with you. We have already said that there is security here, an Islamic system, national unity, and territorial integrity. No one has invaded our land, there is no occupation, and we are united. So, if I negotiate with you, what will be the agenda of our meeting?”
This comes as US President Donald Trump, in his recent remarks, emphasized the importance of Bagram Airfield, stating that due to its proximity to China, the airbase is significant for the United States.
Deputy Min. Denies Internal Strife, Reaffirms Stance Against US Presence
Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development said that 60% of the construction work on this major regional project has been completed.
The Ministry of Economy has rejected a report by The Washington Post regarding security and economic challenges facing the Wakhan project.
Abdul Latif Nazari, the Deputy Minister of Economy, told TOLOnews that Afghanistan, China, and regional countries have the political and economic will to advance this project, and there are no security challenges against it.
“The Ministry of Economy of the Islamic Emirate strongly rejects The Washington Post’s report on Afghanistan’s isolation and the existence of security threats. The Wakhan Corridor can transform Afghanistan into a trade hub and a regional transit and connectivity center. There is political and economic determination in Afghanistan, China, and regional countries to complete this project,” said the deputy minister.
The Washington Post reported that the Islamic Emirate is attempting to turn the remote Wakhan region into an international trade center and connect Afghanistan to China. However, security challenges and a lack of financial resources could hinder the project’s progress.
The newspaper also analyzed different aspects of the Wakhan Corridor project, stating that, according to satellite images, no new construction has taken place in the past seven months, and the completed section of the road ends less than half a mile from the Chinese border.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development said that 60% of the construction work on this major regional project has been completed, but due to cold weather, the work is currently on hold.
Noor-ul-Hadi Adel, the ministry’s spokesperson, said: “60% of the construction work on this project has been completed, but due to the cold weather and snowfall, the road construction has been halted. Once the weather improves, work on the project will resume.”
Two weeks ago, Abdul Karim Fateh, Deputy Minister of Public Works, told TOLOnews in an exclusive interview that the survey for the Wakhan Corridor in Badakhshan has been completed, and the design process is currently underway. He added that once the budget is approved by the leadership of the Islamic Emirate, the ministry is prepared to start its construction.
Economy Ministry Rejects Washington Post’s Report on Wakhan
According to the sources, the main focus of this meeting will be narcotics, alternative cultivation, the private sector, and humanitarian aid to Afghanistan.
Sources told TOLOnews that the United Nations Working Group meeting is scheduled to take place later this month (February), following the third Doha meeting.
According to the sources, the main focus of this meeting will be narcotics, alternative cultivation, the private sector, and humanitarian aid to Afghanistan.
Yousuf Amin Zazi, a political analyst, told TOLOnews: “For the past 20 to 25 years, alternative crops to poppy and narcotics have been discussed, but Afghan farmers have not been provided with them. We must consider the people’s economy. How can we ban poppy cultivation and drug production when there is poverty in the country?”
The sources also confirmed that the Islamic Emirate has been invited to the meeting; however, the Islamic Emirate has not yet commented on the matter.
Abdul Jabbar Akbari, a university lecturer, said: “The more focus and international attention is given to economic and trade issues, the more valuable it will be for Afghanistan’s economy, helping the country emerge from economic isolation.”
Aziz Maarij, another political analyst, said: “The UN Working Group meeting is a continuation of the United Nations’ meetings, particularly following the third Doha meeting. A key aspect of this meeting, set to take place in February, is its focus on alternative poppy cultivation and humanitarian aid to Afghanistan.”
The third Doha meeting was held from June 30 to July 1 last year, focusing on alternative cultivation and Afghanistan’s private sector. It was hosted in Qatar by the UN Deputy Secretary-General for Political Affairs, with the participation of Islamic Emirate representatives and special envoys from over 25 countries.
UN Working Group to Meet in February, Islamic Emirate Invited
Some of these migrants have complained about mistreatment and harassment by Pakistani security forces.
Local officials in Nangarhar say that in the past week, 120 families and 215 Afghan migrants have been forcibly returned to Afghanistan through the Torkham crossing.
According to reports, on Saturday night, the Pakistani government expelled 141 Afghan migrants, many of whom had legal documents.
“120 families, including 550 individuals, along with 215 deported migrants, have been returned from Pakistan to Afghanistan via the Torkham crossing,” said Baz Mohammad Abdul Rahman, head of the Nangarhar Directorate of Refugees and Repatriation.
Some of these migrants have complained about mistreatment and harassment by Pakistani security forces.
“They expelled us and started oppressing us. I was arrested in Islamabad, and in prison, they only gave us one meal, just lentils,” said Gulzada, a deported migrant.
“I was in prison for three days. During this time, they only gave me one meal, and I was beaten four times,” stated Sharifullah, another deported migrant.
“I was arrested in Islamabad. In prison, they neither gave us food nor allowed us to buy food with our own money,” said Sher Agha, another deported migrant.
Meanwhile, officials at the Afghan Embassy in Pakistan have announced that in the past two months, the arrest of Afghan migrants in Islamabad and Rawalpindi has intensified.
“For the past two months, the arrest of Afghan migrants in Islamabad and Rawalpindi has continued in various forms. Just yesterday, arrests took place in many areas. In recent days, Islamabad police have detained dozens of Afghan migrants. A letter from the Pakistani Prime Minister’s Office has been circulated on social media, instructing that all Afghan migrants with ACC cards, UNHCR refugees, and other Afghans with legal documents should be expelled from Islamabad and Rawalpindi and sent back to Afghanistan, said Sardar Ahmad Shakeeb, acting ambassador of the Islamic Emirate in Islamabad.
According to information from the Afghan Embassy in Islamabad, the Pakistani government has decided to expel all Afghan migrants from Islamabad and Rawalpindi in the short term and return them to Afghanistan.
SIGAR also said that the US government might want to consider reviewing the possibility of returning the $4 billion to Afghanistan.
The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), in its 66th report to the US Congress, highlighted President Trump’s directive to suspend US aid for 90 days.
According to the report, the “Taliban’s” interference in humanitarian aid distribution and the ban on women working in aid organizations have further deepened Afghanistan’s economic crisis.
SIGAR also said that the US government might want to consider reviewing the possibility of returning the $4 billion to Afghanistan.
However, Afghanistan’s Ministry of Economy has rejected SIGAR’s report, calling on the US to return Afghanistan’s frozen assets to its central bank.
Abdul Rahman Habib, the spokesperson for the Ministry of Economy, stated: “In addition to US economic sanctions and restrictions, approximately $9 billion of Afghanistan’s foreign reserves remain frozen, which has severely impacted the country’s economy. Any allocation, use, or action by the US regarding these assets is unacceptable. We urge the international community to return this money to Afghanistan’s central bank.”
Meanwhile, the US Secretary of State, in a televised interview, defended the 90-day suspension of foreign aid, emphasizing that some aid might be resumed or partially disbursed after a full review.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said: “And ultimately our foreign aid has to be a tool that we use to advance the national interest. The US Government is not a charity. It spends money on behalf of our national interest.”
At the same time, some economic experts warn that halting US aid will exacerbate poverty in Afghanistan and stress that the Taliban government and the US must negotiate a solution to address this crisis.
Mohammad Asif Stanikzai, an economic analyst, said: “In recent months, international criticism of Afghanistan has intensified, particularly regarding the ban on women’s employment and girls’ education. This issue has led to the suspension of foreign aid. A legitimate solution must be found to allow international organizations to continue providing assistance.”
Abdul Nasir Rashtia, another economic expert, said: “Humanitarian organizations that were assisting people had employed a large number of Afghan citizens, providing them with stable incomes. With the suspension of these organizations’ activities, many people have lost their jobs, further increasing poverty levels.”
The SIGAR report also stated that its operations are scheduled to completely shut down by January 31, 2026.
SIGAR: US Aid Suspension Will Deepen Afghanistan’s Economic Crisis
Taliban officials have a plan to turn one of the country’s remotest corners into a global trade hub by linking the Afghan heartland with China.
ISHKASHIM, Afghanistan — More than three years after the Taliban seized power, Afghanistan remains economically decrepit and politically isolated. But now, the Taliban government has a plan to turn one of the country’s remotest corners into a global trade hub.
The regime wants to build a highway through the Wakhan Corridor, the narrow, rugged panhandle in the far northeast, to connect the Afghan heartland with China — and place itself at the center of international commerce.
If the road is ever completed, it would bypass Pakistan, dramatically cutting travel times between Central Asia and China and potentially promoting trade in rare minerals and other resources, such as lithium, cobalt and gold. The highway’s boosters see it returning Afghanistan to the central place it held ages ago on the Silk Road, as China pushes forward with plans to build a modern version of the route with an intercontinental network of land and maritime routes. “Wakhan is part of it,” said Abdul Salam Jawad, a spokesman for the Taliban-run Ministry of Industry and Commerce.
Buzai Gumbad
The Taliban says its initial task is to pave a 30-mile stretch of dirt road just west of the Chinese border, though 200 more miles are also largely unpaved and badly in need of improvement. Ultimately, the route will require building durable bridges and eliminating river crossings that become inaccessible in high water.
But its detractors say the road could easily become a highway to nowhere.
Satellite images from Maxar, a commercial imaging firm, show that on the Afghan side of the border, no new construction has occurred on the corridor’s Wakhjir Passsince August and that the completed segment ends in rough terrain, less than a half-mile from the border.
“Our government doesn’t have enough budget,” Zabihullah Amiri, director of the provincial Information Ministry, acknowledged in an interview. “We hope that China will help.”
Chinese companies have struck numerous deals to mine rare minerals in Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover. But despite the Taliban’s claims that China is eager to team up with the regime to facilitate trade via the Wakhan Corridor, Beijing has so far stayed away from undertaking large infrastructure projects.
The challenges facing the project are the same as those confronting the Afghan economy as a whole. The Taliban’s tightening restrictions on women and girls have left Afghanistan economically isolated, with many foreign governments, multinational companies and international agencies reluctant to invest under these repressive conditions. Security also remains a grave concern for development amid persistent attacks by Islamist militants, at times targeting Chinese visitors.
Along with a team of Washington Post journalists, I recently traveled from the capital, Kabul — 600 miles from the Chinese border — to the Wakhan Corridor to explore the factors afflicting the highway project and the Taliban’s broader aspirations.
Most of the work on the highway so far has occurred over the border in China. Satellite imagery shows that small portions of roadway there have been recently paved, improving the existing road, and that additional guard posts have been erected at the border.
But Afghan state media has focused instead on even the tiniest progress on the Afghan side.
In Kabul, the headlines about such progress have prompted enthusiasm. Abdul Jabar Saqib, 39, is preparing for what he projects will be an influx of Chinese merchants. He just opened a Chinese restaurant in downtown Kabul and is planning branches elsewhere in the city. Visitors arriving at Kabul’s airport, meanwhile, are greeted these days by a billboard advertising a recently opened Chinese hotel.
Sirajuddin Haqqani, the acting interior minister, recently met with the Chinese ambassador to discuss the Wakhan Corridor and “the enhancement of trade relations,” said Abdul Mateen Qani, a spokesman for the ministry.
So far, demand appears to be primarily driven by companies that can afford to take risks. Some long-standing Chinese merchants, however, say the number of Chinese people starting businesses in Kabul has actually declined since the Taliban takeover, with some citing concerns over the safety of their investments.
A language teacher in Kabul said an initial wave of interest in learning Chinese may already be fading. There is no shortage of work for the limited pool of well-qualified interpreters. But the teacher, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing Chinese funding, said scholarship applications to study in China are being rejected en masse by the Chinese government. Only a few Chinese construction companies have shown interest in recruiting entry-level graduates for road construction or mining projects.
Wary investors
To reach the Wakhan Corridor from Kabul, we first had to follow the main road north, eventually passing through the infamous Salang Tunnel, a claustrophobic, smog-filled 1.7-mile passage built by the Soviet Union at an altitude of over 11,000 feet, where even the most seasoned travelers can experience altitude sickness. The tunnel was a remarkable engineering achievement when it was built in the 1960s, but today, with heavier traffic volumes, travelers often find themselves mired in long jams. The Taliban has announced plans to build a second tunnel, but the cost could be prohibitive.
Upgrading the roadways to Wakhan and then constructing a connecting road to China could require financing like that in the Cold War, international organizations suggest, when the Soviet Union and the United States pumped money into the country because they saw it as strategically important.
Supporters of the Taliban say there has been a noticeable increase in the construction of infrastructure under its rule. But much of that work has been in cities like Kabul, rather than on the eroded network of Afghan highways spanning thousands of miles.
One reason for the continued neglect of highways has been a lack of international funding due to the Taliban’s crackdown on women’s rights, according to foreign donors. Western governments are wary of being seen as supportive of the regime; many international donors have yet to resume funding for major development projects; and Afghanistan’s banking system remains internationally ostracized.
Still, many Afghan men in places like Baghlan — at the north end of the tunnel — are optimistic about the future because the withdrawal of U.S. troops put an end to the country’s long war. Mohammad Wali Baghlani, a 60-year-old businessman in Baghlan, says his region’s golden era is still ahead.
But for women, peace has come at a steep cost. “We’re waiting for a miracle to happen,” said a 23-year-old woman in Baghlan, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid drawing scrutiny from the regime.
Security fears
Beyond Baghlan, the road eventually came to a junction and we turned east, arriving before too long at Taleqan. Under the Taliban’s plans for the Wakhan Corridor, this city would become a major transport hub.
These days, convoys carrying Taliban soldiers race along Taleqan’s roads with sirens blaring. Rumors of robberies and militant attacks are ubiquitous. Such security fears could derail the Taliban’s plans for Wakhan, in part because violence could scare off the Chinese engineers and other experts that the Afghan government is counting on. Continuing attacks could also depress commerce.
Islamic State-Khorasan, the local Islamic State affiliate, has asserted responsibility for numerous attacks in various parts of Afghanistan since 2021, including a December 2022 assault on a hotel in Kabul that injured five Chinese citizens. ISIS-K views the Chinese government as a target, railing against what the group has called “China’s daydream of imperialism.” The increasing reach of the militants was illustrated late last year when a bombing claimed by ISIS-K killed an Afghan cabinet minister, Khalil Haqqani.
In neighboring Pakistan, attacks that have killed 20 Chinese nationals since 2021 brought a strong reaction from the Chinese government, which warned that plans for major construction projects could be in jeopardy and demanded that the Pakistani government take action against the militants responsible for the violence.
The Taliban claims it isn’t worried. “Finally, after four decades of war, we have reached full security across the country,” reads a large roadside billboard on the way north.
But the closer one gets to Afghanistan’s northern border, the more hushed conversations become about the security situation and the more guarded the behavior, with residents often avoiding eye contact. Government snipers were positioned above Taleqan’s market square.
At the end of an interview, Zabihullah Ansar, head of the Taliban’s information directorate in the city, advised us to keep a low profile and hide our foreign identities. “The security situation is dire,” he said.
Someone to blame
More than 100 miles farther east, we finally reached the Wakhan Corridor. It is here that the Taliban dreams of a vibrant commercial artery. Today, it is home to little more than sleepy, neglected villages. The main road is patched together from gravel and pavement, and mostly devoid of traffic.
At the town of Ishkashim, at the western entrance to the corridor, a slogan carved into the mountainside by the previous Afghan government still welcomes visitors. It reads, ironically, “Education For Everyone.” The Taliban has banned girls and women from secondary and university education.
“Maybe, if the road was opened and foreigners came from afar, the Taliban would have to give us more freedom,” mused a 25-year-old woman.
But there is a widening gulf between ambition and reality in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. And as this gap becomes more obvious, some Afghans are looking for someone to blame.
Without providing evidence, local officials in the region are spreading word that foreign powers are behind a plot to prevent the Wakhan road from ever being built. Some Taliban officials and supporters claim that neighboring Pakistan, which could lose the most if the highway is built, may be preparing to invade Afghanistan to block the project.
Paranoia seems to be on the rise here. In Wakhan, Mohammad Zakir Ahmadi, a 54-year-old shepherd, said he was stunned to pass 150 Taliban security checkpoints over two weeks while herding about 20 of his yaks through the corridor.
There is little here to suggest a new future for Afghanistan. But the wreckage of Russian tanks rusting in riverbeds and abandoned NATO military bases with faded camouflage tarps offer ample reminders of the past that Afghans dream of leaving behind.
Lyric Lee, Haq Nawaz Khan, Sarah Cahlan, Shaiq Hussain and Fariba Akbari contributed to this report. Graphics by Amaya Verde and Jarrett Ley.
Rick Noack is The Washington Post’s Afghanistan bureau chief. Previously at The Post, he was the Paris correspondent, covering France and Europe, and an international affairs reporter based in Berlin, London and Washington.
Carolyn Van Houten is a Pulitzer Prize-winning staff photojournalist at the Washington Post.
A Taliban highway could lead to the future. But it’s stuck in the past