Barren Fields and Empty Stomachs: Afghanistan’s Long, Punishing Drought

The New York Times

March 19, 2024

In a country especially vulnerable to climate change, a drought has displaced entire villages and left millions of children malnourished.

They awake in the mornings to find another family has left. Half of one village, the entirety of the next have departed in the years since the water dried up — in search of jobs, of food, of any means of survival. Those who remain pick apart the abandoned homes and burn the bits for firewood.

They speak of the lushness that once blessed this corner of southwestern Afghanistan. Now, it’s parched as far as the eye can see. Boats sit on bone-dry banks of sand. What paltry water dribbles out from deep beneath the arid earth is salt-laced, cracking their hands and leaving streaks in their clothes.

Several years of punishing drought has displaced entire swaths of Afghanistan, one of the nations most vulnerable to climate change, leaving millions of children malnourished and plunging already impoverished families into deeper desperation. And there is no relief in sight.

Reza Karimi, 28, left, and his cousin Khanjar Kuchai, 30, extracting wood and kindling last fall from relatives’ abandoned homes in Nimruz Province, in western Afghanistan.

In Noor Ali’s village in Chakhansur district, near the border with Iran, four families remain out of the 40 who once lived there. Mr. Ali, a 42-year-old father of eight who used to grow cantaloupes and wheat, in addition to raising cattle, goats and sheep, is too poor to leave. His family is subsisting on a dwindling 440-pound bag of flour, bought with a loan.

“I have no options. I am waiting for God,” he said. “I am hoping for water to come.”

The desperation in rural areas, where a majority of Afghanistan’s population lives, has forced families into impossible cycles of debt.

Rahmatullah Anwari, 30, who used to grow rain-dependent wheat, left his home in Badghis Province in the country’s north for an encampment that has sprung up on the outskirts of Herat, the capital of an adjacent province. He borrowed money to feed his family of eight and to pay for his father’s medical treatment. One of the villagers who had lent him money demanded his 8-year-old daughter in exchange for part of the loan.

“I have a hole in my heart when I think of them coming and taking my daughter,” he said.

Mohammed Khan Musazai, 40, had bought cattle on loan, but they were swept away in a flood — when rain comes, it comes erratically, and it has caused catastrophic flooding. The lenders took his land and also wanted his daughter, who was just 4 at the time.

Nazdana, a 25-year-old who is one of his two wives and is the girl’s mother, offered to sell her own kidney instead — an illegal practice that has become so common that some have taken to referring to the Herat encampment as the “one-kidney village.”

She has a fresh scar on her stomach from the kidney extraction, but the family’s debt is still only half paid.

“They asked me for this daughter, and I’m not going to give her,” she said. “My daughter is still very young. She still has a lot of hopes and dreams that she should realize.”

A few years ago, 30-year-old Khanjar Kuchai was thinking about going back to school or becoming a shepherd. He’d served in Afghanistan’s special forces, fighting alongside NATO troops. Now, he is figuring out survival a day at a time — on this day, he was salvaging wood from a relative’s abandoned home.

“They all left for Iran because there is no water,” he said. “Nobody was thinking that this water could dry up. It’s been two years like this.”

At Zooradin High School in Chakhansur, where the winds whip through the empty window frames, there has been no running water in the two years since the well ran dry. Students regularly fall ill from poor hygiene. The lack of rain, aid groups say, creates perfect conditions for waterborne diseases like cholera. 

Mondo, a mother from Badghis who gave only her first name, has lost two of her children in the drought. She miscarried one child and lost another at just 3 months because the family had almost nothing to eat.

Her 9-month-old is always hungry, but she hasn’t been able to produce milk for some time. The large plots of land where her family once grew plentiful wheat, and occasionally poppy for opium, have long since gone barren.

“All day we are waiting to eat something,” she said. Surrounding her in a brightly painted free clinic run by Doctors Without Borders were other mothers clutching frail, famished babies.

With three-quarters of the country’s 34 provinces experiencing severe or catastrophic drought conditions, few corners of the country are untouched by the disaster.

In Jowzjan Province in northern Afghanistan, some who have solar panels have bored even deeper electric-powered wells and are now growing cotton, which can bring higher profits than other crops. But cotton consumes even more water.

“The Taliban came, and the drought came with them,” said Ghulam Nabi, 60, who is newly cultivating cotton. 

Even after the years of drought, many speak as if they can still vividly see their land as it once was — green and plentiful, teeming with melons and cumin and wheat, river birds flitting overhead as fishing boats navigated through the waterways.

With little assistance from the Taliban authorities and international aid perennially falling far short, some say all they can do is trust that the water will someday return.

“We have these memories that these places were completely green,” says Suhrab Kashani, 29, a school principal. “We just pass the days and nights until the water comes.”

This project was supported by the National Geographic Society.

Barren Fields and Empty Stomachs: Afghanistan’s Long, Punishing Drought
read more

Pakistan’s Airstrikes In Khost, Paktika Spark Reactions

Former Afghan president Hamid Karzai, Naseer Ahmad Faiq and some other figures also condemned the Pakistani airstrikes on Khost and Paktika provinces.

Pakistani airstrikes in Afghan territory have provoked reactions from some countries as well as some prominent Afghan political figures.

Vedant Patel, deputy spokesperson for the US State Dept, said regarding these attacks that Afghanistan and Pakistan should resolve any disputes through dialogue.

“We urge both sides to address any differences. We remain committed to ensuring that Afghanistan never again becomes a safe haven for terrorists who wish to harm the United States and its allies,” he said at a press briefing.

“We urge Pakistan to exercise restraint and ensure civilians are not harmed in their counterterrorism efforts,” said Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House spokesperson.

Former Afghan president Hamid Karzai, Naseer Ahmad Faiq, Chargé d’Affaires of Afghanistan’s Permanent Mission to the UN, and some other figures also condemned the Pakistani airstrikes on Khost and Paktika provinces.

“Former President of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, has vehemently condemned the airstrikes by Pakistani military forces on areas in the provinces of Paktika and Khost, considering it a blatant violation of our country’s territorial integrity and international norms,” a statement from the office of Hamid Karzai reads.

“Pakistani military airstrikes on Afghan soil, under any pretext, are flagrant violations of international law and Afghanistan’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. Killing Afghan women and children is unacceptable and cannot justify any security threats,” said Nasir Ahmad Faiq wrote on social media.

“TTP has been present in Pakistan for at least fifteen years, they are operating there, they have their plans, they took many areas and the Pakistani army took them back, so it does not belong to the resumption of the Islamic Emirate,” Sayed Bilal Fatimi, a political analyst, told TOLOnews.

“It is not appropriate for both countries to invade each other’s territory, because this issue creates problems between both countries,” said Mohammad Uddin Mohammadi, another political analyst.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Emirate also said  in a statement that the Chargé d’Affaires of the Pakistani Embassy was summoned in Kabul regarding recent airstrikes in Khost and Paktika provinces.

This comes as Pakistani fighters bombarded parts of Paktika and Khost provinces early Monday morning, resulting in the deaths of eight people, including children and women.

Pakistan’s Airstrikes In Khost, Paktika Spark Reactions
read more

Political Ups and Downs for Islamic Emirate in 1402

This year, the number of diplomatic representations of Afghanistan engaged with the Islamic Emirate reached 38.

Although the Islamic Emirate was not officially recognized by the world in 1402, the caretaker government of Afghanistan expanded its interactions with some countries in the region and beyond.

According to the caretaker government, the number of political representatives of the Islamic Emirate in countries reached 38, and officials of the Islamic Emirate traveled to various countries around the world.

The world has always made the recognition of the Islamic Emirate conditional on: Respect for human rights, especially women’s rights, forming an inclusive government, starting a national dialogue, and counter-terrorism.

“We have not recognized them as a governing power in Afghanistan, they want legitimacy, but they need to meet their commitments. How can you effectively govern and how can you have an effective economy when basically half you workforce–all women–are prohibited from being part of that process? So we are going to keep holding them accountable for their commitments,” said John Kirby, US National Security Council spokesman, on the 12th of Mizan 1402 (October 04, 2023).

In response, the Islamic Emirate said some of the world’s conditions are internal issues of Afghanistan, and it has consistently emphasized that the world should not interfere in Afghanistan’s internal affairs. The Islamic Emirate has also made demands, including the recognition of the caretaker government, the release of the country’s foreign reserves, the expansion of diplomatic relations, and the lifting of sanctions on more than 15 officials of the Islamic Emirate.

“A country should have its boundaries, a nation, and an organization called the government, so they recognize it. What is considered interference is with ‘inclusivity’ and ‘non-inclusivity’ and the nature of the system,” Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, said on the 16th of Jadi 1402 (January 06, 2024).

Officials of the Islamic Emirate traveled to some countries, including Pakistan, Qatar, Turkey, Iran, Turkmenistan, Russia, China, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan this year to improve relations with regional countries.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, the acting Minister of Foreign Affairs, traveled to Pakistan, Iran, Qatar, Russia, Turkmenistan, and Turkey in 1402, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Deputy PM for Economic affairs, went to Iran in the month of Aqrab (October, 2023), and Mawlawi Mohammad Yaqoob Mujahid had a trip to Qatar in the month of Hoot (March, 2024).

“Diplomatic ties with numerous nations are very good and expanding day by day. The fact that Allah Almighty gave security to Afghanistan after 45 years means both Afghanistan itself and its neighbors now have security,” Amir Khan Muttaqi said on the 5th of Mizan 1402 (September 27, 2023).

Countries in the region, including China, Russia, Uzbekistan, and others, have always emphasized engagement with the interim government of Afghanistan.

“The regional and international community should keep on urging the US to live up to its commitments for Afghanistan and live up to its responsibility to Afghanistan. As we know, 20 years of America and NATO’s occupation is a major reason now for what we have seen happening … the destruction and suffering of Afghan people. The US and its allies have cut … aid, frozen Afghanistan’s overseas assets and imposed unilateral sanctions, worsening the suffering of Afghan people,” the Chinese special envoy for Afghanistan, Yue Xiaoyong said on  7th of Mizan 1402 (September 29, 2023).

“Pakistan believes that by engaging with the current authorities in Afghanistan, we can help bring peace to this country as well as prosperity and tranquility to the people of Afghanistan,” Asif Ali Durani, Pakistan’s special representative for Afghanistan, said on the 7th of Mizan 1402 (September 29, 2023) about his country’s stance towards Afghanistan.

This year, the number of diplomatic representations of Afghanistan engaged with the Islamic Emirate reached 38.

The Afghan embassies in the Netherlands and Spain engaged with the Islamic Emirate in the month of Mizan 1402 (September, 2023), the Afghan embassy in New Delhi announced the permanent cessation of its activities in the month of Aqrab (October, 2023); however, the General Consulate of Afghanistan in Hyderabad, India, announced the resumption of consular services of the Afghan embassy in New Delhi in the next month. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced the possibility of the reopening of the Azerbaijan embassy in the country in the month of Hoot (March,2023).

Meanwhile, China introduced Zhao Xing as its new ambassador to Afghanistan in the month of Sonbola 1402 (September, 2023), and Beijing accepted the credentials of Bilal Karimi as the ambassador from Afghanistan.

“Xi Jinping, president of China, while accepting the credentials of Bilal Karimi as ambassador and special representative of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, welcomed him as ambassador in China,” said Hafiz Zia Ahmad Takal, deputy spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said on the 11th of Dalwa 1402 (January 30, 2024) about the acceptance of the Islamic Emirate’s ambassador in Beijing.

This matter led Washington to question the nature of China’s relationship with the Islamic Emirate.

“I think I would let the Chinese government speak to what this means in terms of their relationship and whether they have formally recognized the Taliban or not. I’ve seen some comments from them to the contrary,” Matthew Miller, spokesperson for the US Department of State, said on the 11th of Dalwa 1402 (January 31, 2024).

The relationship of the Islamic Emirate with the country’s eastern neighbor deteriorated due to accusations of terrorists using Afghan soil.

Khawaja Muhammad Asif, Pakistan’s minister of defense, said on the 27th of Hoot 1402 (March 18, 2024): “Parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which is on the border with Afghanistan — terrorists come to Pakistan from there (Afghanistan). We discussed the issue with the officials of the current government in Afghanistan and we know where the terrorists have shelters,” he said.

Meanwhile, the fate of the constitution and the official cabinet in 1402 remained unclear. The Islamic Emirate, upon returning to power in Afghanistan, suspended the 1382 constitution.

Nonetheless, Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, told TOLOnews in the month of Hoot (March, 2024) that efforts to establish a constitution are underway and that the absence of a constitution does not mean that Afghanistan is in a legal vacuum. “We are not in a legal vacuum; Islamic Sharia is a very comprehensive law that specifies the duty of every individual in the government and the system,” he said.

Despite all this, 1402 ended while some issues including introduction of an official cabinet and the issue of a tricolor flag of the country remained unclear and it remains to be seen how these issues will be addressed in the coming year.

Political Ups and Downs for Islamic Emirate in 1402
read more

Generals who carried out Biden’s Afghan exit face new GOP scrutiny

The Washington Post
March 19, 2024

The top two generals who oversaw the deadly evacuation of Afghanistan are facing renewed scrutiny Wednesday, as House Republicans escalate their campaign to hold President Biden accountable for the fiasco and Democrats accuse Donald Trump of having set the conditions for the Kabul government’s collapse.

Retired Gens. Mark A. Milley and Kenneth “Frank” McKenzie, career military officers who served in senior roles under both presidents, are testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee as part of its oversight investigation.

The U.S. departure from Afghanistan, marked by scenes of desperation and violence, continues to be a political challenge for Biden, who has defended his decision-making and blamed Trump for boxing him in by signing a deal with the Taliban that agreed to withdraw troops with few conditions.

Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.), the committee chairman, has highlighted in the past that Milley, McKenzie and other senior defense officials recommended against the United States’ full withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 but that Biden disregarded their advice. The congressman said at the hearing’s outset that his committee’s investigation has uncovered “repeated instances” of the White House “refusing to listen” to such warnings.

During a hearing in February, McCaul accused leaders at the White House and the State Department of having “stuck their heads in the sand” as it became increasingly clear that Afghanistan’s fall was imminent. Taliban fighters had overrun numerous cities and districts on their march to Kabul, facing nominal resistance from the Afghan security forces trained and subsidized by the U.S. government over 20 years.

Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is expected to discuss the timing for shuttering the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan, a key tipping point in the crisis, said a person familiar with his thinking. A U.S. military investigation released in 2022 exposed profound frustration among numerous defense officials who detailed what they deemed a lack of urgency within the State Department despite clear evidence that security was crumbling.

Military personnel would have been “much better prepared to conduct a more orderly” evacuation, Navy Rear Adm. Peter Vasely, the top U.S. commander in Kabul during the operation, told Army investigators, “if policymakers had paid attention to the indicators of what was happening on the ground.”

Biden administration officials have fiercely disputed those characterizations, saying that while early parts of the evacuation were difficult, the U.S. government eventually stabilized security well enough to airlift 124,000 people from harm’s way. That was made possible in part by McKenzie, the former head of U.S. Central Command, striking a deal with the Taliban in which the militants would provide security outside the international airport in Kabul while U.S. forces manned the airfield’s perimeter.

Thousands of desperate civilians choked the streets around the facility in the days that followed as they sought to leave the country. The Taliban executed some of them, U.S. troops have said in interviews with military investigators and the media.

On Aug. 24, 2021, as the end of the evacuation neared, a suicide bomber later determined to be affiliated with the Islamic State detonated a bomb in a tightly packed outdoor corridor at the edge of the airport, killing 13 U.S. troops and an estimated 170 Afghans. Dozens more were wounded.

U.S. troops who survived the blast said they also came under gunfire, but U.S. military investigators found that the loss of life was linked to the single explosion. Military officials later agreed to review those findings and conduct additional witness interviews. The results are expected to be made public soon.

Generals who carried out Biden’s Afghan exit face new GOP scrutiny
read more

Pakistani Airstrikes in Afghanistan Kill at Least 8, Taliban Officials Say

Christina Goldbaum and 

Christina Goldbaum reported from Kabul, Afghanistan; and Zia ur-Rehman from Karachi, Pakistan.

The New York Times

March 18, 2024, Updated 9:17 a.m. ET

Pakistan launched two airstrikes into Afghanistan on Monday morning that killed at least eight people, Afghan officials said, escalating simmering tensions between the two countries.

The pre-dawn strikes were carried out in the Paktika and Khost provinces in eastern Afghanistan around 3 a.m., Afghan officials said. Three children were among those killed, according to Taliban officials, who condemned the strikes as a violation of Afghan territory.

The strikes came amid a surge of attacks by militants in Pakistan following the Taliban’s seizure of power in neighboring Afghanistan. Pakistani officials have blamed militants harbored on Afghan soil and protected by the Taliban administration for the attacks. Taliban officials have denied those claims.

Zabihullah Mujahid, a spokesman for the Taliban administration, said in a statement on X that his country “has a long experience of freedom struggle against the superpowers of the world” and “does not allow anyone to invade its territory.”

“Such incidents can have very bad consequences which will be out of Pakistan’s control,” he added.

The Pakistani action came two days after militants attacked a military post in northwestern Pakistan, near the border with Afghanistan. In a statement released Monday evening, the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the country had carried out “intelligence-based antiterrorist operations” inside Afghanistan and accused the Taliban administration of aiding militants operating in Pakistan.

Over the past two years, the statement said, the Pakistani government has “repeatedly urged the Afghan authorities to take concrete and effective action to ensure that the Afghan soil is not used as a staging ground for terrorism against Pakistan.”

“However, certain elements among those in power in Afghanistan are actively patronizing T.T.P. and using them as a proxy against Pakistan,” it added, referring to the Pakistani Taliban, also known as the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, or T.T.P.

The strikes and statement appeared to signal that Pakistan’s newly elected government would take a tough stance with the Taliban administration in Afghanistan over the militant violence that has roared back in Pakistan in recent years. That violence has shattered a relatively calm period since the country’s military carried out a large-scale military operation in 2014 and forced militants across the border into Afghanistan.

After the U.S.-backed government in Afghanistan collapsed in August 2021, the pace of attacks by militants surged in Pakistan, with the assaults themselves becoming bolder. In 2023, the number of attacks by militant groups in Pakistan rose by nearly 20 percent compared with the previous year, according to the Pak Institute for Peace Studies, which monitors extremist violence and is based in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital.

The violence has raised fears of a wider conflict breaking out along the historically contested border, known as the Durand Line, between Afghanistan and Pakistan. It has also fueled growing tensions between the Pakistani authorities and Taliban officials, who deny offering support to militant groups operating in Pakistan, including their ally, the Pakistani Taliban.

Pakistani officials have repeatedly asked the Taliban administration in Afghanistan to rein in the militants. In response, the Taliban authorities have suggested that Pakistan address the militants’ demands and have offered to mediate talks.

The Pakistani authorities’ frustration with the Taliban administration appeared to boil over in September, when the Pakistani government announced a policy aimed at expelling the more than half a million Afghans residing illegally in Pakistan.

The strikes on Monday appeared to send another message to the Taliban administration that Pakistan’s military and newly elected government would take a tougher stance on the militant violence.

The airstrikes sought to “dispel perceptions of a weak Pakistani state,” said Muhammad Amir Rana, head of the Pak Institute for Peace Studies. They also “reflect a unified counterterrorism policy between the new civilian government and the military,” he added.

While sporadic cross-border shelling from Pakistan frequently killed civilians in Afghanistan during the U.S.-led war, the strikes on Monday were the first that Pakistan had launched into Afghanistan in nearly two years. The last strikes, in April 2022, killed at least 45 people in the Khost and Kunar provinces of eastern Afghanistan.

The strikes on Monday were part of the military’s response to the attack on the military post on Saturday, a suicide blast that killed seven members of the Pakistani security forces, according to the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs. That attack also prompted the military to carry out an operation in the area and kill eight militants, according to a statement on Monday by the Inter-Services Public Relations office, the Pakistani military’s media arm.

Pakistani government officials promised an enduring response to the militants’ attack.

“Pakistan has decided that whoever enters our borders, homes or country to commit terror, we will respond to them strongly, regardless of their identity or country of origin,” President Asif Ali Zardari said while speaking at the funeral prayers for the army officers killed in the attack.

Safiullah Padshah contributed reporting from Kabul; and Salman Masood from Islamabad, Pakistan.

Christina Goldbaum is the Afghanistan and Pakistan bureau chief for The Times. More about Christina Goldbaum

Pakistani Airstrikes in Afghanistan Kill at Least 8, Taliban Officials Say
read more

Girls’ Despair Over Schools Reopening in Coming Academic Year

They said that due to the closure of schools, they have faced psychological problems and have lost hope.

As the new academic year 1403 (solar year) approaches, girls deprived of education in Herat are demanding the reopening of schools for students above grade six.

They said that due to the closure of schools, they have faced psychological problems and have lost hope.

Sharifa Ghiasi told TOLOnews that she was in grade seven when she was deprived of going to school and had to turn to tailoring out of necessity.

She added that she has been counting the days for the reopening of schools, but so far, her wish has not been fulfilled.

“It has been two years since the schools were closed, and we turned to tailoring. We request the Islamic Emirate to open the schools so that we can study and build a good future,” Sharifa told TOLOnews.

A number of girls deprived of education, who are engaged in tailoring alongside Sharifa, said that due to being deprived of education, they have turned to tailoring and vocational training out of necessity.

“We came here out of necessity because we were always at home, and now we have become busy with tailoring, and we want from the Islamic Emirate to reopen the schools,” said Hasanat Osmani, a deprived student.

“We were not allowed to go to school and had to turn to tailoring; we want to continue our studies,” said Nazanin Habibi, another student.

About 20 girls deprived of education are engaged to learn tailoring daily at different times in a tailoring workshop, and some of these girls have become tailors during the past two years.

“They come to us for work and training; these are girls deprived of education, they work here with their broken heart of their hopes because they are not interested in tailoring; they want to go to school, study, and to have a good future,” said Rana Ishaqzai, the head of the tailoring workshop.

More than 900 days have passed since the closure of schools for girls above grade six.

The Ministry of Education has always announced that the closure of girls’ schools is not permanent but temporary until further notice, but it is still unclear when the schools for girls above grade six will reopen.

Girls’ Despair Over Schools Reopening in Coming Academic Year
read more

Afghan Territory Used Against Pakistan: Pakistani Officials

Khawaja Muhammad Asif said Afghan territory was the source of terrorist attacks on Pakistan.

The Minister of Defense of Pakistan, Khawaja Muhammad Asif, claimed that Afghan soil is used against Pakistan and that the issue was discussed with Kabul in the past.

“Parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which is on the border with Afghanistan — terrorists come to Pakistan from there (Afghanistan). We discussed the issue with the officials of the current government in Afghanistan and we know where the terrorists have shelters,” he said.

Rejecting Pakistan’s defense minister’s remarks, the Islamic Emirate said that Afghan soil is not used against any country.

The deputy spokesman of the Islamic Emirate, Hamdullah Fitrat, said that no one is allowed to harm the security of another country using Afghan soil.

“The Afghanistan Islamic Emirate does not allow anyone to harm the security of any country using Afghan soil,” he said.

Several political and military analysts said that Pakistani officials should refrain from such baseless claims and should address the issues through negotiations.

“The remarks of Pakistani officials have a negative impact on Kabul-islamabad relations, and instead of such claims, Pakistan should solve its problem through negotiations,” Mohammad Matin Mohammad Khil, a military analyst told TOLOnews.

“If Pakistan has any documents and evidence, they should share it with the caretaker government of Afghanistan so that they can address them, and Pakistan should ensure the security of its borders,” said Mohammad Uddin Mohammadi, a political analyst.

Earlier, Asif Ali Durani, Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan, claimed that five to six thousand members of the TTP are sheltered in Afghanistan.

The Islamic Emirate has repeatedly rejected the claims of Pakistani officials.

Afghan Territory Used Against Pakistan: Pakistani Officials
read more

Islamic Emirate Fires on Pakistan in Response to Airstrikes in East

Mujahid, condemning the mentioned attacks, said that such attacks would have bad consequences that Pakistan would not be able to handle.

In response to the Pakistani military’s air strikes in the early morning on Monday on the Barmal district of Paktika and the Spera district of Khost, the Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Emirate has issued a statement saying that they have responded to these attacks and targeted Pakistani military centers with heavy weapons.

The statement said: “Once again, Pakistani military and reconnaissance jets have entered Afghanistan’s territory and bombarded the homes of civilians in Barmal of Paktika and Spera of Khost.”

Meanwhile, Zabihullah Mujahid, the spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, in a statement said that any violation of Afghanistan’s sovereignty would have bad consequences.

Mujahid, condemning the mentioned attacks, said that such attacks would have bad consequences that Pakistan would not be able to handle.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s statement said the following:  “Last night around 3 AM, Pakistani aircraft bombed civilian homes in the Laman area of Barmal district in Paktika province and the Afghan Dubai area of Spera district in Khost province, resulting in 6 martyrs in Paktika, including 3 women and 3 children, and one house destroyed, and in Khost province, one house was destroyed and 2 women were martyred.”

He has requested the new government of Pakistan not to spoil the relations between the two countries because of the “reckless” actions of a few military generals and not to shift the blame of their incompetence onto the Afghan side.

Pakistani media reported that a commander of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) named Abdullah Shah was killed in these attacks.

Meanwhile, a commander of the TTP named Abdullah Shah, in a video where he speaks himself, has denied this news and said that he resides in South Waziristan and his activities continue there.

At the same time, in the Dand-e-Patan district of Paktia, a military confrontation between the Islamic Emirate and Pakistani soldiers started this morning (Monday) at seven and is ongoing, according to sources.

Sources have told TOLOnews that in the artillery fire by the forces of the Islamic Emirate, three Pakistani soldiers were wounded in the Burki area across the Durand Line.

Official Islamic Emirate sources have not yet commented on the fight in Paktia.

Islamic Emirate Fires on Pakistan in Response to Airstrikes in East
read more

US Intelligence Report: Low Threat of Uprising in Afghanistan

The report states that the regional powers will cautiously proceed with the Kabul’s request.

The Annual Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community has stated that the near-term prospects for regime-threatening resistance in Afghanistan remain low.

The annual report  reads that, large swathes of the Afghan public being weary of war and fearful of “Taliban” reprisals, and since armed remnants lack strong leadership and external support, the threats to the Islamic Emirate are low.

The report further reads that the current Afghan government has strengthened its power, suppressed its opponent groups and has bolstered international engagement but the issues of humanitarian crisis and rights are unlikely to be addressed adequately.

“The Taliban will not adequately address Afghanistan’s persistent humanitarian crisis or structural economic weaknesses. The Taliban will continue to implement restrictive measures, carry out public punishments, crack down on protests, and prevent most women and girls from attending secondary school and university,” reads part of the annual report.

Regarding the request of the Islamic Emirate to be formally recognized, the report states that the regional powers will cautiously proceed with the Kabul’s request.

“Regional powers will continue to focus largely on keeping problems contained in Afghanistan and seek to develop transactional arrangements with the Taliban while proceeding cautiously with Taliban requests for formal recognition,” part of the report.

The Islamic Emirate top officials have persistently said that they want positive engagement with all countries in the world including the US and Russia and that the current diplomatic and economic relations with countries, is recognition of the caretaker government.

The intelligence report has also expressed concern about the US persons possibly facing ideologically diverse threat from terrorism.

According to the report, al-Qa‘ida has reached an operational nadir in Afghanistan and Pakistan and ISIS has suffered cascading leadership losses in Iraq and Syria, regional affiliates will continue to expand.

Earlier, the Islamic Emirate has said that Afghanistan’s soil is secure and that no group will be allowed to threaten other countries from it.

In respect to its opponents, top officials in Kabul have continuously asked those who have left Afghanistan to return to country and contribute to rebuilding Afghanistan.

US Intelligence Report: Low Threat of Uprising in Afghanistan
read more

Washington struggling to isolate the Islamic Emirate

Ariana News
March 17, 2024

A growing number of governments, including China, are going against Washington’s approach and are not treating the Islamic Emirate as a pariah regime.

According to an article published in Foreign Affairs, the United States and its allies’ approach has been to isolate the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA), by withholding diplomatic recognition and the benefits that usually come with normal diplomatic relations.

The approach that the United States and its allies and partners ultimately converged on was a commitment to continue engaging with the Afghan people—for example by providing substantial humanitarian aid—while withholding diplomatic recognition of the IEA and the benefits that usually come with normal diplomatic relations.

In fact, over the past two years, the United States has sought to build on this approach—not only by withholding its own recognition of the IEA but also by sustaining an international consensus on nonrecognition.

However, in the wake of concerted diplomatic efforts by the IEA to court neighboring countries and others in the region, several nations have been willing to accommodate the Islamic Emirate.

As Foreign Affairs reported, these states are among foreign governments that have embassies in Kabul and that host Afghan embassies overseas.

In January, several of these powers, including China, Iran, and Russia, even took part in a multilateral conference of their own hosted by the IEA.

Meanwhile, the IEA appears to be unmoved by global shaming, in particular when it comes to what they deem domestic affairs, such as the question of girls’ access to higher education and women’s right to work, Foreign Affairs reported.

Instead, Afghanistan’s leaders have portrayed international pressure as a violation of the country’s sovereignty, framing calls by Western leaders to uphold international norms as the latest episode in a long history of interference and intervention.

As the IEA has become more established in power, they have doubled down on a posture of resistance. As a result, rather than moderate their policies, they have pressed forward with further restrictions on women and social norms, Foreign Affairs reported.

The article stated that the erosion of the consensus on diplomatic isolation of the IEA raises important questions for Washington and its partners.

Nonrecognition is no longer a credible coercive tool, and if the United States seeks to influence the Islamic Emirate’s behavior, it must find other ways to achieve its desired aims.

Moreover, the Afghan case echoes similar situations Washington has faced with other difficult regimes, including its failure to prevent Arab countries from normalizing ties with Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, despite crimes committed during the Syrian civil war, or to enforce a global consensus on the isolation of Russian President Vladimir Putin following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Today, attempts by the United States to impose pariah status on regimes it doesn’t like are running up against serious limits.

However, analysts disagree on why Russia and China have not taken the final step of recognizing the IEA. One possibility is that both powers still seek more assurances from Kabul, especially concerning potential terrorist threats from (Daesh) Islamic State Khorasan and a number of other groups.

And as long as the United States actively promotes a nonrecognition strategy, Moscow and Beijing can reap many of the benefits of recognizing the IEA without having to formally buck the international consensus, Foreign Affairs reported.

“Thus, they can reassure the Taliban (IEA) they are on their side (for example by backing them in last December’s UN Security Council proceedings, defending Taliban positions on the recommendations of a recent UN assessment) while also withholding full recognition,” the article read.

Overall, the IEA is not being treated as a pariah regime – despite concerted US efforts to maintain an international consensus on nonrecognition. On the contrary, the region, led by China, is gradually normalizing with Kabul—and intends to continue doing so.

The IEA, for their part, are being validated by this expanding engagement. Their sense of confidence and a loss of patience with conditions-based, Western-backed engagement was evident in their refusal to attend the UN meeting of Afghan envoys in February.

The IEA was not invited to last year’s summit, so they rejected the new meeting as “ineffective and counterproductive.” Likely emboldened by Beijing treating them as a normal regime, the IEA responded to the UN’s invitation by insisting they be treated as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

Foreign Affairs reported that with new sources of support, the IEA has less reason to submit to Western demands on human rights or inclusiveness in their government.

The failure of Washington’s existing IEA approach highlights the growing challenges to US diplomatic power around the world, Foreign Affairs stated.

Amid two major wars and intensifying strategic competition with China, the United States faces new difficulties in forging a collective international response to pressing global crises.

Meanwhile, China and regional actors are charting their own diplomatic paths, and regimes that the United States seeks to pressure can often find enough friends to defy Washington and maneuver for diplomatic gain, Foreign Affairs reported.

Washington struggling to isolate the Islamic Emirate
read more