UN Requests $1.71 Billion for Afghanistan Humanitarian Aid in 2026

 

The United Nations has requested $1.71 billion for 2026 to support humanitarian programs in Afghanistan, citing widespread poverty, unemployment, and urgent relief needs.

The United Nations has requested $1.71 billion in funding for humanitarian programs in Afghanistan for 2026, warning that the country remains one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises despite a slight reduction in overall needs.

According to the UN Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, approximately 21.9 million people, nearly 45 percent of the population, will require humanitarian assistance next year. Ongoing conflict, economic fragility, food insecurity, and climate-related shocks are cited as the main drivers of need.

The UN report highlights that years of underinvestment in basic services, combined with recurring natural disasters, widespread drought, and the return of millions of migrants from neighboring countries, have severely weakened the resilience of Afghanistan families.

Aid organizations also noted the impact of restrictions on women and girls, stating that denial of education, employment, and participation in public life reduces household income, increases dependence on humanitarian aid, and limits relief operations.

Afghanistan faces staggering socioeconomic challenges, with UN data indicating nearly 75 percent unemployment and 90 percent of the population living below the poverty line, intensifying vulnerability to crises.

The return of millions of Afghan migrants from Iran and Pakistan in recent years has put immense pressure on local economies, public services, and humanitarian infrastructure, straining an already fragile system.

The UN has warned that continued funding shortages could force aid agencies to scale back life-saving programs, particularly for women, children, and internally displaced persons, at a time when needs remain acute nationwide.

Experts stress that sustained international support, alongside targeted economic and social programs, is critical to mitigating the ongoing humanitarian disaster and preventing further deterioration in the livelihoods of millions of people of Afghanistan.

UN Requests $1.71 Billion for Afghanistan Humanitarian Aid in 2026
read more

Pakistan-Afghanistan Fued Freezes $3 Billion in Annual Bilateral Trade

  • The border closure, triggered by cross-border clashes and accusations of sheltering the TTP rebel group, has trapped approximately 8,000 truckers and halted bilateral trade, which previously amounted to $2 billion to $3 billion annually.
  • The trade halt is inflicting severe economic damage, causing irreparable losses to traders, impacting Pakistan’s citrus exports, and silencing Peshawar’s once-bustling gemstone market.
  • Experts believe that while the Taliban is seeking new trade routes with Iran and Central Asia, the long-term economic opportunities for Afghanistan—such as the TAPI pipeline and regional transport links—will ultimately still require stable relations and doing business with Pakistan.

Kabul

For nearly two months, Sayed Wali, a young Afghan truck driver, has watched the sun rise, and the sun set in the fabled Khyber Pass, which connects western Pakistan to eastern Afghanistan. But he’s not here for the view. He’s stuck.

Wali can’t even leave his 10-wheel truck and its cargo unattended for fear it could be robbed or ransacked.

He was taking a shipment of Afghan imports from Pakistan’s southern seaport city of Karachi through some 1,800 kilometers of roads that wind from the Arabian Sea up through to the treacherous Khyber mountains and onward to Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul.

Then politics got in the way.

Simmering tensions between the Taliban-led Afghan government and Islamabad boiled over into fierce border clashes in early October after Pakistan carried out air strikes inside Afghanistan.

Islamabad accused Kabul of sheltering the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) rebel group, whose attacks killed scores of Pakistani troops in September.

In a repeat of its key lever to pressure landlocked Kabul, Islamabad sealed half a dozen major and minor border crossings with Afghanistan on October 12. But instead of negotiating for reopening the vital trade routes, the Taliban retaliated by shutting the border with Pakistan in early October.

Wali is not alone; some 8,000 truckers are stuck at the two major border crossings along the 2,640 kilometers of the Durand Line, which separates the two countries.

“We are miserable. The cold is now unbearable and we’ve been stranded here for two months away from our families,” Wali recently told RFE/RL’s Radio Mashaal.

“We are sick of this misery,” he said. “The two should resolve this problem once and for all.”

In the weeks that followed the diplomatic dispute, Kabul struck new deals to increase trade and open new routes with Iran, Central Asia, and India. The Taliban government called on Afghan traders and investors to seek new partners, suppliers and manufacturers away from Pakistan.

“This has been one of the most debilitating and tragic closures,” said Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Center for Research and Security Studies, a think tank in Islamabad.

“This has badly impacted tens of thousands of people from both sides — farmers, daily wage workers, traders and truckers,” he said.

Irreparable Losses

Nearly five decades of war and political turmoil have entangled the two countries in a complex web of population movements, trade, transport and mostly free movement across their porous border.

Before the border closure, bilateral trade between Islamabad and Kabul was between $2 billion and $3 billion annually, according to the Pak-Afghan Joint Chambers of Commerce and Industry (PAJCCI).

Islamabad was the dominant partner. Its exporters accounted for most of the trade and included industrial goods, pharmaceuticals, cement, and food. Kabul, on the other hand, sent its fresh and dry fruits to Pakistan. The country served as a major transit route for Afghan imports, generating considerable revenue.

Now Islamabad’s predicament is visible. Every winter, it sold more than $50 million worth of citrus fruits to Afghanistan and, via its routes, to its western Central Asian neighbors. But this year’s crops are being sold cheaply domestically.

Shahid Hussain, the senior vice president of the Sarhad Chamber of Commerce and Industries in the northwestern city of Peshawar, says the trade war has already caused irreparable losses to traders and investors in both countries.

“There is no way traders can recover from these losses,” he told RFE/RL’s Radio Mashaal. “Everything they had built over the past few decades has been ruined.”

In Peshawar, the fallout from the continued border closure is everywhere.

The city’s once-bustling gemstone market is silent. Most of its shops and offices are closed, as no raw stones used in ornaments and jewelry have crossed into Pakistan from Afghanistan.

Most of the minerals processed and refined in this market are mined in various parts of the Hindu Kush mountains, which shape and dominate the Afghan landscape.

“If the border continues to be closed, it will affect thousands of workers and associated businessmen,” said Abdul Jalil, the president of the Peshawar Gemstone Association.

‘Traders Cannot Absorb More Losses’

In Kabul, Younas Mohmand, a business leader, says insulating trade from the troubled bilateral relations between the two neighbors might provide a good beginning toward restoring ties.

“Business ties should resume in return for future guarantees from Pakistan,” he told RFE/RL’s Radio Azadi repeating the Taliban’s key demand from Islamabad. “Our traders cannot absorb more losses.”

Graeme Smith, a bestselling author and regional analyst, says Kabul will need Islamabad for major projects aimed at transforming it into a trade, transport and energy hub between Central Asia and South Asia.

“Like it or not, most of the big economic opportunities will require doing business with Pakistan,” he said.

First conceived nearly three decades ago, the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline project remains a pipe dream.

Similarly, sending Central Asia’s abundant hydropower to Pakistan and linking the region to Islamabad via a railway line would require stability within Central Asia and stable relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

By RFE/RL 

Pakistan-Afghanistan Fued Freezes $3 Billion in Annual Bilateral Trade
read more

U.S. Allocates $2 Billion to UN, Afghanistan Excluded from Aid

Khaama Press

The United States announced $2 billion in humanitarian aid for the United Nations, but Afghanistan will not be included due to political interference concerns.

The United States has announced $2 billion in humanitarian aid for the United Nations, though Afghanistan and Yemen will not be included in the assistance.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Monday that the new funding model aims to share the burden of UN humanitarian programs with other developed nations.

Officials described the amount as a fraction of past U.S. contributions, but still significant enough to maintain America’s position as the world’s largest humanitarian donor.

Afghanistan and Yemen, both facing severe humanitarian crises, were excluded due to political interventions in aid distribution, according to U.S. authorities.

American officials cited Taliban interference in Afghanistan and Houthi control in Yemen as the main reasons for withholding assistance from these countries.

The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) annually requests funding to support millions of vulnerable populations affected by conflict, natural disasters, and food insecurity.

Historically, the U.S. has been the largest contributor to global humanitarian efforts, though President Donald Trump’s administration reduced foreign aid and pressed the UN to downsize or eliminate programs.

The $2 billion allocation represents the first phase of U.S. support for the current UN humanitarian appeal, signaling continued engagement despite political and operational challenges.

Experts say excluding Afghanistan and Yemen highlights the growing impact of political interference on international aid and raises concerns about the effectiveness of humanitarian responses in conflict zones.

U.S. Allocates $2 Billion to UN, Afghanistan Excluded from Aid
read more

Afghanistan to remain major crisis in 2026, UN, partners warn

Humanitarian resources to support women and their children are diminishing in Afghanistan.
United Nations press office
December 30, 2025

025A mother holding a baby and guiding a young child through a field of rubble in Afghanistan, likely after a flood, under a clear blue sky.

© UNICEF/Mark Naftalin

Afghanistan is expected to remain one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises in 2026, UN agencies and humanitarian partners warned on Tuesday, launching a $1.7 billion appeal to assist nearly 18 million people in urgent need.

Years of conflict, compounded by worsening food insecurity, recurrent natural disasters, climate change impacts and large-scale returns of displaced people, have left an estimated 45 per cent of the population – some 21.9 million people – in need of humanitarian assistance next year.

Of those, 17.5 million people – more than three-quarters of them women and children – have been prioritised for support under the coordinated response.

Food and basic hygiene

Food security and sanitation remain among the most urgent needs.

The Afghanistan Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan projects that during the 2025-2026 lean season, more than one-third of Afghanistan’s population will face crisis-level or worse food insecurity, as defined by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC).

This means many households will meet minimum food needs only by depleting essential livelihood assets – a sharp deterioration compared with the previous year.

The ongoing drought has also led to the failure of nearly 80 per cent of rainfed wheat crops in several regions, leaving many families without food stocks for the winter.

Sanitation conditions are equally dire: an estimated 25 per cent of households relied on unimproved water sources this year, while 37 per cent lacked soap for basic hygiene.

The response will prioritise water, sanitation and hygiene needs in areas most affected by drought, cholera outbreaks, disasters and large-scale returns.

Returning home to crisis 

Afghanistan is facing one of the world’s largest and fastest-growing returnee-related displacement crises, with around five million people returning to the country this year.

More than 2.6 million Afghans returned from Iran and Pakistan, driven largely by tightened migration policies and deteriorating protection conditions.

Many have returned to districts already grappling with poverty, food insecurity, drought and limited access to basic services, further straining local capacities.

More aid for less

In 2026, humanitarian partners aim to reach more people with fewer resources.

The $1.71 billion required represents a 29 per cent reduction compared to the resources needed in 2025. Yet it aims to reach about 4 per more than the target last year.

These changes have been “driven by sharper prioritisation, notable efficiency gains, and a strategic shift away from high-cost, less sustainable interventions,” the response plan noted.

 

Afghanistan to remain major crisis in 2026, UN, partners warn
read more

‘That video saved our lives’: how women are defying the Taliban’s brutal crackdown on protest

Zahra Nader and Sayed Abdali for Zan Times

It was nearly dark on 19 January 2022 when the knocking began. At first soft, then insistent, the sound echoed through the flat in the Afghan capital, Kabul. Zarmina Paryani and her sisters froze. They had known this day was coming.

“We always knew the risks of protesting and we were prepared to die on the streets,” the 26-year-old activist told the Guardian. “But I never imagined they would come for us like that – in the middle of the night, breaking into our home.”

Just three days earlier, she and dozens of women had protested on the streets and burned a burqa in a symbolic act of defiance against the Taliban’s growing restrictions. The protest had been organised via WhatsApp groups and word of mouth.

The image of the burning burqa, shared on social media, had gone viral and ignited uproar among Taliban soldiers and supporters, who were demanding the women be stoned to death for disrespecting the garment. Now, they were at her door.

As masked men began forcing their way inside, Paryani says she made a desperate decision. “I couldn’t bear to be taken alive. I couldn’t watch them enter our bedroom, violate us or behead us in the night.” She jumped from the three-storey window.

Zarmina Paryani stands in an open urban space on an overcast day
Zarmina Paryani now lives in exile in Germany with her sisters. Photograph: Sayed Abdali

Miraculously, she survived the fall with minor injuries. Just as fortunately, before the Taliban could break down their door, her sister Tamana Paryani recorded a short video in which she screamed that the Taliban were outside. She sent the footage to a journalist and it was immediately posted on social media, with their arrest initially denied by the militants.

“That video saved our lives. It was the only weapon we had.”

Zarmina grew up in Panjshir, in a deeply religious family. For years, before she moved to Kabul, her education consisted only of mosque schooling. “From a young age, we were taught that women were ‘deficient in mind’. I believed it. I adjusted myself to it.”

But school brought questions. Why were her high marks never enough to prove her worth compared with her brother? Why did neighbours mock her for attending school at all? Her mother, who had been denied an education, encouraged her daughters to keep going. “She used to say: learn so you will never need to depend on a man.”

Zarmina trained as a midwife, but when the Taliban returned to power in August 2021, the small gains that women and girls had made evaporated overnight. “It felt like a storm had come. Everything we had, even the little things, they took away.”

In the early weeks of the takeover, a spontaneous women’s protest movement emerged. Largely leaderless, composed of ordinary women – students, police officers, teachers, midwives – it began as scattered, small-scale marches. Zarmina and her sisters joined.

“We didn’t tell our father. He would never have let us go. Like many families, they didn’t support the protests because they feared for our safety.”

They covered their faces with masks, met in secret, and hid signs inside black plastic bags. Sometimes they changed locations at the last minute to evade Taliban patrols. Their demands were simple: the right to study, to work, to live without fear.

“We were not affiliated with any political party. We were just women asking for our rights,” says another protester, who was detained and beaten by Taliban officials after a protest near Kabul University in December 2022.

By January 2022 and the raid on Zarmina’s home, the sporadic arrests had turned into a targeted suppression. The video her sister sent to the journalist spread across international media and prompted global outrage. But inside Afghanistan, the result was clear: dissent would be met with brutal force.

The Taliban were arriving at the site of protests sometimes before the protest had started, says Zarmina, with women repressed into silence.

Today, no women come to the street to protest. The last known public protest took place in west Kabul in September last year. Indoor protests, symbolic acts, such as dancing alone in a mosque or burning the burqa, are now the only forms of resistance.

Since the Taliban’s return to power, women and girls have been barred from nearly every aspect of public life: schools, universities, most jobs and even parks.

Zarmina spent 27 days in detention before being released and told: “If you speak again, we will cut your throat.”

People sit at a long table on a platform as an audience looks on
A session of the hearings for the People’s Tribunal for Women of Afghanistan, held in Madrid in October. Photograph: Courtesy of Rawadari

She managed to escape to Pakistan disguised in a burqa and plastic shoes and now lives in exile in Germany. “I don’t feel secure even here. And when I write or speak, I wonder: will my father be harmed? Will my family be punished?”

Despite her fears, she testified at the People’s Tribunal for Women of Afghanistan during a hearing in Madrid in October, one of the few venues where Afghan women have spoken publicly about gender apartheid under Taliban rule. “It didn’t change what happened to me, but at least it’s a record for history.”

Rashida Manjoo, chair of the Tribunal, said: “The systematic exclusion of women and girls [by the Taliban authorities] from education, employment, healthcare, freedom of expression, public life and freedom of movement constitute gender persecution.”

Zarmina and other anti-Taliban protesters in exile say they continue to get messages from girls in Afghanistan who have been pushed into marriage, or forced to do sex work to be able to afford to feed their children.

“We used to think the Taliban were just a group of religious men. Now we see what their rule really means. Maybe next time, people won’t be fooled. Sometimes I think this generation, with all this suffering, might finally learn who the real enemy is.”

Zahra Nader is editor-in-chief and Sayed Abdali a reporter at Zan Times journalist

‘That video saved our lives’: how women are defying the Taliban’s brutal crackdown on protest
read more

UN Reports Northern Afghanistan Farmers Struggle to Replace Opium Income

Khaama Press
December 29, 2025

A United Nations report on Monday, December 29, revealed that farmers in northern Afghanistan are struggling to replace income lost from opium cultivation, highlighting urgent economic and livelihood challenges.

A new United Nations report reveals that opium farmers in northern Afghanistan are struggling to replace lost income following bans on poppy cultivation. Surveys conducted in Badakhshan, Balkh, and Kunduz provinces show 85 percent of households have been unable to offset revenue losses, leaving communities in urgent need of economic support.

The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) noted that while poppy cultivation in Badakhshan has increased in certain areas, nearly 95 percent of former poppy farmers reported halting cultivation due to legal restrictions. Wheat and other grains have become the dominant alternative crops, cited by more than 90 percent of respondents.

Background reports indicate Afghanistan produces over 80 percent of the world’s opium, fueling a global narcotics trade. International efforts to reduce cultivation have historically faced challenges due to persistent rural poverty and limited alternative livelihoods.

Additional studies highlight how repeated droughts, irregular rainfall, and water scarcity have further reduced agricultural productivity. Families face constrained options for sustainable recovery, forcing many to revert to opium cultivation despite official bans.

The UN report emphasizes the severe economic shock to farming communities and calls for targeted humanitarian and livelihood interventions to support sustainable alternatives.

Meanwhile, analysts stress that without focused aid programs, Afghanistan rural populations risk deepening poverty and food insecurity. Support must include access to water, credit, and market linkages for alternative crops.

UNODC warns that the failure to implement effective substitution programs could undermine Afghanistan’s broader security and development objectives, potentially reversing recent gains against narcotics production.

Repeated droughts, irregular rainfall, and water shortages have significantly reduced agricultural productivity, leaving families with limited options for sustainable recovery. Despite efforts, the Taliban have so far been unable to eliminate opium cultivation in Afghanistan.

UN Reports Northern Afghanistan Farmers Struggle to Replace Opium Income
read more

Afghanistan Ranked Among Six Most Insecure Countries Globally Amid Rising Poverty, Migration, and Humanitarian Crisis

Khaama Press

Afghanistan is ranked among the world’s most insecure countries, with political instability, economic hardship, humanitarian crises, and restricted opportunities for women driving widespread migration and insecurity.

An international research institute has named Afghanistan as one of the six most insecure countries in the world. Following Afghanistan, Yemen, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Russia, and war-torn Ukraine were also identified among the least secure nations globally.

The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) noted that although armed conflicts have decreased since the Taliban returned to power, poor governance, humanitarian crises, and political instability continue to fuel insecurity. Security in Afghanistan, the report emphasizes, is not limited to armed clashes.

Data released on Saturday, December 27, show Afghanistan as the least secure country in South Asia. Factors such as widespread access to weapons by unaccountable groups, rising violent crime, political instability, and large-scale internal and external migration place the country at the bottom of global peace rankings.

According to the IEP, Afghanistan under Taliban rule ranks 158 out of 163 countries worldwide in terms of human security and peace. The report also notes that Afghanistan and Ukraine bear the highest economic costs of violence, exceeding 40 percent of their GDP.

The Global Peace Index, published annually by the Institute for Economics and Peace, identifies Iceland, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, and Switzerland as the world’s most peaceful countries, highlighting the importance of political stability, economic security, and social cohesion.

The report defines insecurity beyond armed conflicts, assessing social safety, internal and external tensions, and the degree of state militarization. True peace, according to the IEP, requires social, political, and economic stability, not just the absence of fighting.

Access to essential services is also a key indicator of social peace. Afghanistan’s health system is under severe strain due to declining foreign aid, with the World Health Organization reporting that 80 percent of its services were reduced this year because of budget shortfalls.

Afghanistan is also among the top four countries generating international refugees. By mid-2024, more than half of all registered refugees at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees came from Afghanistan, Syria, Ukraine, and Venezuela.

Despite the end of active conflict between the Taliban and Afghanistan’s former government, lack of economic opportunities, fear of Taliban enforcement, and restrictions on women’s education and employment have pushed many citizens to migrate abroad. These conditions undermine social and economic security for families.

Ongoing tensions between the Taliban and neighbouring countries such as Iran and Pakistan have led to mass expulsions of Afghan migrants. International organizations warn that Afghanistan’s current infrastructure and public services cannot accommodate the returning populations, increasing humanitarian and environmental pressures.

Afghanistan Ranked Among Six Most Insecure Countries Globally Amid Rising Poverty, Migration, and Humanitarian Crisis
read more

UNICEF Warns Funding Cuts Could Push Six Million Children Out of School by 2026

UNICEF warned that continued cuts to global education funding could deny schooling and essential services to six million children worldwide by 2026.

The UN children’s agency UNICEF has warned that continued cuts to global education funding could force up to six million children out of school by the end of 2026.

In a statement posted on X on Sunday, December 28, UNICEF said children in crisis-hit regions, including Somalia and Palestine, face losing access to schooling and essential services provided through schools.

UNICEF stressed that education for every child is “life-saving and life-changing,” urging donors and governments to shield learning systems from the impacts of conflict and humanitarian crises.

According to the agency, schools in fragile settings often serve as more than learning spaces, providing food, psychosocial support, and a sense of safety for vulnerable children.

Prolonged conflicts, displacement, climate shocks, and economic pressures have already disrupted education for millions worldwide, with funding gaps widening as humanitarian needs increase.

UNICEF warned that shrinking budgets threaten not only education but also children’s access to nutrition, mental health care, and protection services linked to schools.

The agency said the loss of these services could deepen long-term inequalities, increasing risks of child labour, early marriage, and exploitation.

Meanwhile, UNICEF called on international donors to urgently reverse funding cuts and prioritize education as a core humanitarian response.

It added that sustained investment in children’s education is critical to preventing a “lost generation” and ensuring stability and recovery in crisis-affected societies.

UNICEF Warns Funding Cuts Could Push Six Million Children Out of School by 2026
read more

Millions of Afghans face hunger as aid cuts deepen a humanitarian crisis

By ABDUL KAHAR AFGHAN

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — For 10 hours a day, Rahimullah sells socks from his cart in eastern Kabul, earning about $4.5 to $6 per day. It’s a pittance, but it’s all he has to feed his family of five.

Rahimullah, who like many Afghans goes by only one name, is one of millions of Afghans who rely on humanitarian aid, both from the Afghan authorities and from international charity organizations, for survival. An estimated 22.9 million people — nearly half the population — required aid in 2025, the International Committee for the Red Cross said in an article on its website Monday.

But severe cuts in international aid — including the halting of U.S. aid to programs such as food distribution run by the United Nations’ World Food Program — have severed this lifeline.

More than 17 million people in Afghanistan now face crisis levels of hunger in the winter, the World Food Program warned last week, 3 million more than were at risk more than a year ago.

The slashing in aid has come as Afghanistan is battered by a struggling economy, recurrent droughts, two deadly earthquakes and the mass influx of Afghan refugees expelled from countries such as Iran and Pakistan. The resulting multiple shocks have severely pressured resources, including of housing and food.

UN appeals for help

Tom Fletcher, the U.N. humanitarian chief, told the Security Council in mid-December that the situation was compounded by “overlapping shocks,” including the recent earthquakes and increasing restrictions on humanitarian aid access and staff.

While Fletcher said nearly 22 million Afghans will need U.N. assistance in 2026, his organization will focus on 3.9 million facing the most urgent need of lifesaving help due to reduced donor contributions.

Fletcher said this winter was “the first in years with almost no international food distribution.”

“As a result, only about 1 million of the most vulnerable people have received food assistance during the lean season in 2025,” compared to 5.6 million last year, he said.

The year has been devastating for U.N. humanitarian organizations, which have had to cut thousands of jobs and spending in the wake of aid cuts.

“We are grateful to all of you who have continued to support Afghanistan. But as we look towards 2026, we risk a further contraction of life-saving help — at a time when food insecurity, health needs, strain on basic services, and protection risks are all rising,” Fletcher said.

Returning refugees

The return of millions of refugees has added pressure on an already teetering system. Minister of Refugees and Repatriation Affairs Abdul Kabir said Sunday that 7.1 million Afghan refugees had returned to the country over the last four years, according to a statement on the ministry website.

Rahimullah, 29, was one of them. The former Afghan Army soldier fled to neighboring Pakistan after the Taliban seized power in 2021. He was deported back to Afghanistan two years later, and initially received aid in the form of cash as well as food.

“The assistance was helping me a lot,” he said. But without it, “now I don’t have enough money to live on. God forbid, if I were to face a serious illness or any other problem, it would be very difficult for me to handle because I don’t have any extra money for expenses.”

The massive influx of former refugees has also sent rents skyrocketing. Rahimullah’s landlord has nearly doubled the rent of his tiny two-room home, with walls made half of concrete and half of mud and a homemade mud stove for cooking. Instead of 4,500 afghanis (about $67), he now wants 8,000 afghanis (about $120) – a sum Rahimullah cannot afford. So he, his wife, daughter and two young sons will have to move next month. They don’t know where to.

Before the Taliban takeover, Rahimullah had a decent salary and his wife worked as a teacher. But the new government’s draconian restrictions on women and girls mean women are barred from nearly all jobs, and his wife is unemployed.

“Now the situation is such that even if we find money for flour, we don’t have it for oil, and even if we find it for oil, we can’t pay the rent. And then there is the extra electricity bill,” Rahimullah said.

Harsh winters compound the misery

In Afghanistan’s northern province of Badakhshan, Sherin Gul is desperate. In 2023, her family of 12 got supplies of flour, oil, rice, beans, pulses, salt and biscuits. It was a lifesaver.

But it only lasted six months. Now, there is nothing. Her husband is old and weak and cannot work, she said. With 10 children, seven girls and three boys between the ages of 7 and 27, the burden of providing for the family has fallen on her 23-year-old son – the only one old enough to work. But even he only finds occasional jobs.

“There are 12 of us … and one person working cannot cover the expenses,” she said. “We are in great trouble.”

Sometimes neighbors take pity on them and give them food. Often, they all go hungry.

“There have been times when we have nothing to eat at night, and my little children have fallen asleep without food,” Gul said. “I have only given them green tea and they have fallen asleep crying.”

Before the Taliban takeover, Gul worked as a cleaner, earning just about enough to feed her family. But the ban on women working has left her unemployed, and she said she developed a nervous disorder and is often sick.

Compounding their misery is the harsh cold of the northern Afghan winter, when snow halts construction work where her son can sometimes find jobs. And there is the added expense of firewood and charcoal.

“If this situation continues like this, we may face severe hunger,” Gul said. “And then it will be very difficult for us to survive in this cold weather.”

Associated Press writers Farnoush Amiri at the United Nations, Jamey Keaten in Geneva and Elena Becatoros in Athens contributed to this report.

Millions of Afghans face hunger as aid cuts deepen a humanitarian crisis
read more

Republicans Who Backed Afghan Visas Are Mum as Trump Halts Them

Back in 2021, as Kabul fell to the Taliban following the chaotic U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, Republicans in Congress were among the loudest voices in Washington arguing that the United States had to throw open its doors to those Afghans who had assisted Americans during roughly two decades of war.

At the time and in the years since, G.O.P. lawmakers have pressed for the expansion of a special visa program for Afghan allies, insisting in letters to the administration, in hearings and in news conferences staged outside the Capitol, that it be expanded.

Then Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan man who enlisted in a paramilitary force that worked with Americans and who was evacuated by the U.S. military in 2021, was charged with shooting two National Guard members in downtown Washington just before Thanksgiving, killing one and severely wounding the other.

President Trump declared that the United States “must now re-examine every single alien who has entered our country from Afghanistan” during the Biden administration. And even though Mr. Lakanwal was not admitted under a Special Immigrant Visa, the administration halted that program, closing the last legal pathway for Afghans to enter the country.

Republicans who were some of the leading advocates for the United States to provide refuge for Afghans have now gone quiet, apparently resigned to the demise of the Special Immigrant Visa program.

“Politically, I wouldn’t say it’s dead on arrival, but it’s severely damaged now,” Representative Michael McCaul, Republican of Texas, said of the push to issue more visas. “It’s just hugely unfortunate, because they fought alongside our military. They are veterans.”

Yet there has been no move by the Republican-led Congress to scrutinize the administration’s decision to suspend the visas, or to attempt to force the administration to resume issuing them.

Since 2021, the United States has allowed more than 190,000 Afghans to settle in the country, some on green cards as Special Immigrant Visa recipients, and others who were permitted to enter the country temporarily while they applied for permanent residency or asylum.

A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers had been pressing for an additional 20,000 visas to be issued, writing in a letter to senior appropriators in May that the program included “rigorous vetting” and was critical to providing “a lifesaving path to safety for Afghan nationals who face deadly retribution as a result of their work alongside U.S. troops, diplomats, and contractors.”

But the shooting shattered the bipartisan consensus.

“What happened changed things,” said Representative Lloyd K. Smucker, a Pennsylvania Republican who was among those calling for more visas in the spring. “I’ll defer to the president on what he thinks is the right thing to do.”

“After this,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, referring to the shooting, “we’re going to have to look at everything.”

Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the Republican chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, said it was “evident” that more vetting was needed, but that “there were an awful lot of Afghans who were invaluable in assisting our troops and helping to keep them safe.”

Some Democrats were far more blunt. Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, a Democrat who flew to Kabul in 2021 on an unauthorized trip to witness the evacuation of Americans and Afghans, said his Republican colleagues no longer appeared interested in collaborating on a solution for the visa program.

Republicans widely condemned the Biden-era parole program that allowed tens of thousands of Afghans to stay in the country for two years while they applied for legal permanent residency. Mr. Lakanwal entered the country under that temporary legal status and was granted asylum in April.

Some immigration hard-liners in Congress have called for beefing up the vetting of such immigrants, including by rescreening and possibly deporting some Afghans.

But Republicans have argued that vetting for the special visa program — which required applicants to undergo background checks, biometric screenings and interviews, and to submit a written recommendation from a top military or diplomatic official — is meticulous.

“We’ve had veterans in the past who have created horrific acts of violence, like Tim McVeigh, Lee Harvey Oswald,” said Mr. McCaul, who was the top Republican on the Foreign Affairs Committee during the Afghanistan withdrawal. “But we don’t condemn the whole community. What it’s doing is it’s basically saying that all Afghans are terrorists. And they’re not.”
Senator Markwayne Mullin, Republican of Oklahoma, who attempted to enter Afghanistan amid the evacuation, said the Biden administration had “dumped” Afghans with Special Immigrant Visas into the country with insufficient federal programs to assist them.

“We need to put a pause on until we get ahold of the people that came here through the S.I.V. program, and we have touched base with them, know where they’re at and make sure they’re all in a good space,” Mr. Mullin said.

Representative Jason Crow, Democrat of Colorado, who worked closely with Republicans in 2021 to push for a robust resettlement program for Afghan partners, said Republicans were too afraid of political backlash to challenge Mr. Trump’s pause on the visa program.

“There are Americans alive today who would not have come home had it not been for Afghans who stood and protected them,” Mr. Crow said. He said Republicans had lost sight of the role of Congress to “be a check on the presidency, regardless of whether the president in office is your party or not.”

Republicans Who Backed Afghan Visas Are Mum as Trump Halts Them
read more