His family fled Afghanistan facing threats for supporting US troops. Now he sits in ICE custody at risk of being sent back

Lal Mohammad Noorwali (far right) with brothers Bakhtullah (left) and Naqibullah (middle) at a Veteran’s Day celebration, November 11, 2021. The family arrived in the US in September 2021.
When Said Noor, a US Army veteran, picked up a phone call on December 2, he immediately knew something was wrong.  His brother Lal was in Laredo, Texas, several hours south of their home in Austin, nervously explaining that the commercial truck he drove had been stopped at a Customs and Border Protection checkpoint.

When the agents asked if he was a US citizen, Lal, 28, answered honestly: He isn’t. He, his mother and five of his brothers and sisters had fled Afghanistan in the wake of the US’ military withdrawal, and he is currently awaiting a decision on an asylum claim he submitted years ago.

As Said stayed on the line with his younger brother, Said could hear someone aggressively demanding to know who Lal had called and why. Said told Lal to provide whatever the officials needed so he could go, but his brother sounded worried, so Said told him to pass the phone to the agent.

He tried to calm the agent down, he told CNN.

“I told him ‘sir, let’s just talk to each other as adults, right?’ I was like, ‘you’re an officer and you took an oath to defend the Constitution.’ I said, ‘I have done the same thing, I was in the Army, I’m a veteran right now,’” he said.

That seemed to defuse the situation somewhat, Said recalled, but the man kept repeating that Lal is “not allowed to be here” in the US. Said tried to explain that Lal, who is married to a US citizen, was brought to the US legally through the US military’s evacuation of Afghanistan, an effort largely aimed at protecting families like his who had worked with American troops and faced threats from the Taliban. He tried to explain Lal’s pending asylum case, the legal process through which Lal was trying to gain permanent status in the US along with 80,000 other Afghan nationals who fled the country and have similarly looked to create new homes in America.

But soon the phone was handed to a second agent. He was told that they were working to verify Lal’s status.

Afghan asylum cases had received bipartisan support until a sharp shift in tone after an Afghan refugee shot two members of the National Guard in Washington, DC in November days before Lal was stopped at the checkpoint.

Hours passed, with Said continuing to communicate with his brother while the agents waited for a response from the Department of Homeland Security. But then the communication stopped. Said could still see Lal’s location on the app Life360, but he couldn’t get in touch with him, and when he called a nearby border patrol station, no one seemed to be able to find him.

For two days, Said told CNN he couldn’t find his brother — he called several border checkpoints but found himself trapped in a cycle of transferred calls.

One officer even told Said to call the Afghan embassy; when he explained there was no Afghan embassy in the US because the Taliban was in control of the country, the officer said to call the Taliban, the same group that Said told CNN had detonated a bomb just outside of his family’s home in 2020, killing several people, in retaliation for his work with US troops.

“I came to America a legal way,” Lal told CNN from the detention facility in Laredo during a December interview, saying he and his family just want the chance to “live a good life.”

Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin confirmed Lal was detained on December 1, after he’d been referred for secondary inspection at a border patrol point of entry. McLaughlin called Lal a “criminal illegal alien” whose “criminal history includes previous arrests for assault and damage to property.”

Court documents shared by Lal’s family, however, show that a charge of “criminal mischief” against Lal, brought in 2023, was dismissed by a judge in Galveston, Texas, resulting in no conviction or finding of guilt. Said told CNN the incident revolved around an allegation that Lal had broken another person’s phone, which Lal denied. The charge was dismissed due to there being no witnesses, the motion to dismiss said, and the family said that it was Lal’s only run in with law enforcement.

McLaughlin also said Lal was told to pull over in December because his work authorization had expired, but Said explained that he had already applied for a renewal. Lal was issued a commercial driver’s license in Texas in August 2025, which expires in 2034.

McLaughlin did not respond to follow-up questions regarding the dismissed charge or his work authorization renewal.

While Lal expected to have his final court hearing on February 12, a request by his lawyer to delay the hearing was granted as they seek to resolve the issue outside of court. Without an agreement, Lal will find out on March 10 if he is being deported back to the country he’d fled with his family nearly five years ago.

Lal and his family are among thousands of Afghans who were brought to the US as the country fell to Taliban rule in August 2021. The panic to flee materialized in a chaotic, frantic period of days as men, women, and children begged US and allied military partners to get them on a plane — any plane — out of the country. Children were handed over barbed wire at Hamid Karzai International Airport to US troops in desperate attempts to get them to safety.

The monumental task of getting civilians out of the country — primarily focused on Afghans who worked with the US government and military, and their immediate family members — resulted in the evacuation of more than 124,000 people, the Air Force later said. Dubbed Operation Allies Refuge, it was the largest non-combatant evacuation in US history.

Lal’s family was evacuated in a daring rescue organized by service members on the ground in coordination with Democrat Rep. Seth Moulton, a Marine veteran who traveled to Afghanistan with Republican Rep. Peter Meijer amid the withdrawal.

Like many, the family was facing particular danger given Said’s work with the US military as a civilian interpreter and later service as a soldier. Said moved to the US in 2014, joined the US Army in 2016, and was honorably discharged in August 2020.

At the time of the US evacuation, and for several years afterwards, there was strong bipartisan support for providing refugee status for Afghan families that had aided the US during the twenty years of operations in that country.

In 2022, now-Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz criticized the Biden administration for “abandoning” Afghan allies and called for officials to be held accountable for the “unkept promises of security for their safety.” Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, an Army veteran, called on former President Joe Biden to keep troops in Afghanistan “until we have rescued every American citizen and those Afghans who risked their lives for American troops.” In August 2021, a bipartisan group of 55 senators urged Biden in a letter to expedite the evacuation of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa recipients and their families.

But that support has faded, especially in the wake of a November shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, DC. One soldier, Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, died. The suspect was identified as a 29-year-old Afghan man who came to the US in the wake of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, further fueling criticism from Trump administration officials about vetting of refugees.

CNN previously reported that the man, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, underwent numerous rounds of vetting starting in 2011 as he worked with US military and intelligence agencies. He was ultimately approved for permanent asylum by the Trump administration last year.

In the wake of the shooting, the Trump administration announced that the processing of all immigration cases for Afghan immigrants was being “stopped indefinitely” pending further review.

President Donald Trump said at the time that he planned to pause asylum applications for “a long time.”

“We don’t want those people,” Trump said aboard Air Force One.

In the wake of November’s shooting, detentions and efforts against Afghan immigrants have “definitely ramped up,” Jordan Weinberg, Lal’s attorney at Atlas Immigration Law, told CNN.

“We are seeing a much higher difficulty for Afghans,” Weinberg said.

After the attack, US Citizenship and Immigration Services announced it would be undertaking a “full scale, rigorous reexamination” of green cards issued to people from 19 countries “of concern,” including Afghanistan.

McLaughlin previously said in a statement that DHS was “indefinitely” stopping the processing of all immigration requests related to Afghan nationals “pending further review,” including asylum cases approved under the Biden administration.

McLaughlin told CNN this week that Operation Allies Welcome and Operation Allies Refuge “let thousands of unvetted Afghan nationals including terrorists, sexual predators, pedophiles, domestic abusers, and kidnappers into our country.”

“Under Secretary (Kristi) Noem, DHS has been going full throttle on identifying and arresting known or suspected terrorists and criminal illegal aliens that came in through Biden’s fraudulent parole programs and working to get the criminals and public safety threats OUT of our country,” McLaughlin said.

Targeted by the Taliban

The year before he helped his family flee, Said was visiting them at their family home in Khost Province in Afghanistan. He’d just left the US Army as a sergeant, deciding to depart the service because he was not authorized to travel to Afghanistan as an off-duty US soldier, he said, and he wanted to help them with their immigration paperwork.

He’d been home in Afghanistan for roughly a week when his family held a gathering at their home, giving him a chance to talk to friends and family he hadn’t been able to see in years: school friends, cousins, other distant relatives and neighbors that he’d missed after moving to the US.

Said Noor on deployment in Ghazni Province, Afghanistan, 2018.

Lal had been on the roof of the house. The blast “literally picked him up and threw him onto the ground,” Said said. The family thought he’d been killed. When Lal regained consciousness, he thought he was dreaming, he told CNN from the detention facility in Texas, until he saw the dead.

“I can’t sleep, I get nightmares when I’m sleeping,” he told CNN, his voice cracking. “The people there, they died in front of me, in our home.”

Lal’s asylum claim paperwork, submitted in 2022, says six people were killed and more than a dozen others injured. The Taliban ultimately claimed responsibility, Said told CNN.

The family had been targeted because of his service, Said believes, both for helping the American forces while he was a civilian in Afghanistan and later when he put on the US Army uniform.

“There’s no future for them, no safety. There’s no mercy at all from the Taliban,” Said said of the threats against his family. “Lal’s fear is not based on imagination; his fear is based on memories.”

Lal and Said’s father and brother-in-law have faced detention by the Taliban in recent years, both brothers told CNN, weighing heavily on their mother who is now in the US.

Said felt strongly about supporting the US, he said, feeling that America “believed in human rights,” and that he would do “whatever it takes” to help the Americans prevail.

Official military records show Said joined the US military in October 2016 and served as an interpreter, deploying back to Afghanistan as a soldier for eight months in 2018. While deployed there, Said worked with senior military officers and even worked with local media, he recalled — a job that made him recognizable to the Taliban. He attended senior-level meetings alongside US officials as a translator, and appeared in photos with senior Afghan and US officials, including now-retired Gen. Austin “Scott” Miller, the last senior commander overseeing US and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Lal and Said have a brother currently serving in the US Army and a younger sister who wants to join the US Air Force, Said said. He describes theirs as a US military family who care deeply about service and simply wanted a safer life for themselves.

“We believed in this country, right?” Said told CNN. “I risked my life for this country. I never imagined that I would be begging one day just to keep my brother alive, here in America, while he hasn’t done anything wrong.”

On the official DHS document provided to Lal, outlining the reason for his detention and saying he is subject to removal from the US, the allegations listed say only that he is not a citizen of the US and that he was paroled into the US after arriving through Operation Allies Refuge.

“You are immigrant not in possession of a valid immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document as required by the Immigration and Nationality Act,” the document says.

A shift after November’s shooting

Lal’s detention happened just days after the November shooting, as the Trump administration was rapidly closing doors for Afghan refugees — and refugees from several other countries — to find ways to stay in the US.

In 2025, the Trump administration revoked 85,000 visas of all categories as part of a broader attempt to limit who can come to the US. Last month, the administration instituted an indefinite suspension of immigrant visa processing for people from 75 countries, including Afghanistan. Lawmakers have also fiercely debated the topic of visas for Afghans, and just this month Congress declined to authorize any additional special immigrants visas for Afghans who worked with the US.

Top White House aide Stephen Miller railed against asylum seekers at the southern border in a post on X earlier this month, saying there is a “multibillion dollar fraudulent industry” to file “fake asylum applications.”

“Federal law requires illegal aliens to be detained pending a hearing for their (fake) asylum claim,” Miller said.

Heather Hogan, policy and practice counsel at American Immigration Lawyers Association, said Miller’s assertion that it is required to detain immigrants awaiting their asylum claim is “definitely not accurate.”

“In the past, asylum seekers were largely left to pursue their cases and work and live, and their kids could go to school while they were going through the motions of their cases because what is the utility of detaining them?” Hogan said. “When they could otherwise be and want to be working and participating in their communities and providing for their families and themselves?”

Hogan also said lawyers with AILA have reported seeing a more “aggressive” stance from the government toward Afghans in particular, including those who previously worked with the US government in Afghanistan.

People who worked with the US and are still in Afghanistan have faced revenge killings by the Taliban, according to human rights groups. Amnesty International, for example, reported Taliban officials beating, killing or disappearing Afghans who worked with the former government or served in the Afghan National Security Forces. In the weeks after the US’ withdrawal, Human Rights Watch also reported the killing or disappearance of at least 47 former members of the ANSF.

Lal has already gone to extraordinary lengths for a chance at a new life in the US.

He and his sister were shepherding her five young children to the gates of the Kabul airport, part of the desperate crowd attempting to flee, when a suicide bomber attacked Abbey Gate, killing 13 US troops and roughly 170 Afghan civilians.

Said recalled speaking to his brother right after the attack, asking him if he was sure he still wanted to try to escape with their family, knowing what danger they could face.

“Lal clearly said, ‘Yes, (it would be) better to die here than be in the hands of the Taliban,’” Said told CNN. “Just think about it — you saw people die in front of you, but you still want to take that risk for your entire family to get into the base, to come to the United States. Lal did not want to give up.”

 

His family fled Afghanistan facing threats for supporting US troops. Now he sits in ICE custody at risk of being sent back
read more

Pakistan Defense Minister Signals Possible Military Action Before Ramadan

Khawaja Asif, Pakistan’s Minister of Defense, told a Pakistani media outlet that a military action against Afghanistan could take place before the holy month of Ramadan, comments that may signal increasing security pressure from Islamabad.

He did not provide specific details regarding the nature or scope of the potential action but stressed that Pakistan would not remain silent in the face of what he described as “security threats.”

“My personal view is that it will happen before Ramadan; about 10 to 12 days remain until Ramadan. Of course, I am only speculating and not making a recommendation based on confirmed intelligence. However, this action should be taken as soon as possible,” Asif said in the interview.

Meanwhile, political and military analysts believe that at a time when relations between Kabul and Islamabad remain fragile, such statements by Pakistani officials could further strain bilateral ties.

“If these remarks lead to practical measures and harsher rhetoric, relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan may become even more tense in the future,” said military analyst Sadiq Shinwari.

Political analyst Zmaraldin Adib said Asif’s comments suggest that Pakistan seeks to undermine Afghanistan, particularly the current government, and does not want the international community to recognize it. “Based on these statements, Pakistan can be viewed as a project-driven state,” he added.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has not yet commented on the defense minister’s recent remarks. However, it had previously described attributing Pakistan’s security incidents to Afghanistan as irresponsible.

Pakistan Defense Minister Signals Possible Military Action Before Ramadan
read more

Security Council Renews Mandate of Afghanistan Sanctions Monitoring Team

The U.S. representative called on the Islamic Emirate to end what Washington described as a “hostage-taking” policy.

On February 12, the United Nations Security Council voted to renew the mandate of the Monitoring Team supporting the 1988 Afghanistan Sanctions Committee for another 12 months. The United States, the penholder on Afghanistan sanctions, authored the draft resolution.

The U.S. representative said the team’s assessments remain important and called on the Islamic Emirate to end what Washington described as a “hostage-taking” policy.

Speaking at the Security Council, U.S. Deputy Representative Tommy Bruce said: “We find the Monitoring Team’s assessments valuable—especially regarding the Taliban’s counterterrorism efforts and human rights record, particularly affecting women and girls—as these factors directly influence security and stability throughout Afghanistan and the broader region.”

Russia’s representative, meanwhile, emphasized the need for engagement between the UN monitoring team’s experts and the Islamic Emirate, adding that Moscow supports a possible visit by the experts to Kabul.

Russia’s Deputy Representative Anna Evstigneeva said: “The text of the resolution is strikingly oversaturated with elements that are not directly related to the implementation of the 1988 Security Council sanctions regime, not to mention the mandate of the Monitoring Team itself. We deem counterproductive any attempts by certain delegations to shift the focus from the core issues of combating terrorism and drug trafficking to the human rights situation in the country; such attempts are unlikely to contribute to the effective implementation by the experts of their tasks.”

China’s representative to the UN Security Council also voted in favor of the draft resolution but called for the lifting of the travel ban on officials of the Islamic Emirate. Fu Cong urged the Islamic Emirate to seriously combat terrorism.

He added that, as a first step, the permanent exemption from the travel ban for relevant Afghan government officials should be reinstated to facilitate their international engagement and communications.

Although the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has not yet commented on the matter, it has repeatedly called on the international community to lift sanctions, stating that they are not in the interest of any party and should be ended.

Security Council Renews Mandate of Afghanistan Sanctions Monitoring Team
read more

U.S. Drafting New Afghanistan Policy, Official Says

Following the political changes of August 2021 and the return of the Islamic Emirate to power, U.S. policy toward Afghanistan entered a new phase.

More than four years after Afghanistan’s political transformation, Washington is once again redefining its policy toward the country.

The U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State announced that various branches of the U.S. government are currently working on drafting a new policy on Afghanistan. According to him, the timeline for announcing the policy has not yet been determined.

Paul Kapur made the remarks during a hearing of the Subcommittee on South and Central Asia under the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, where members of Congress raised questions about the future of U.S. engagement with Afghanistan.

“The review to which you refer is an ongoing interagency process with many moving parts. I do not know the exact schedule or timeline, but I can commit to remaining in touch with you and the committee and your staff and to informing you when we reach a more specific or preliminary conclusion before a final report is issued,” Kapur said.

Political analysts believe that announcing a new policy could have significant implications for Washington’s relations with Kabul, regional countries, and even Western allies.

“Afghanistan holds a special place in the strategies of major powers. The more positive and constructive the relations between Afghanistan and the United States become, the more beneficial it will be for both sides,” said political analyst Abdul Sadiq Hamidzai.

Meanwhile, international relations expert Wahid Faqiri emphasized that the Trump administration’s policy toward Afghanistan remains unclear, adding that it is not yet known when the policy will be finalized or what its main principles will be.

Following the political changes of August 2021 and the return of the Islamic Emirate to power, U.S. policy toward Afghanistan entered a new phase. Washington has refrained from formally recognizing the Islamic Emirate, while attempting to balance political pressure and sanctions with the continuation of humanitarian assistance.

U.S. Drafting New Afghanistan Policy, Official Says
read more

UK envoy says freedom of expression vital for Afghanistan’s future

UK Special Representative for Afghanistan Richard Lindsay said independent Afghan media play a crucial role in bringing citizens’ voices to the international community.

Lindsay said on X that he met representatives of independent Afghan media to discuss their work and the importance of protecting freedom of expression.

He stressed that freedom of expression is essential for building a secure, inclusive, and prosperous future for all Afghan citizens.

“Meeting Afghan independent media representatives, we discussed how media outlets both inside & outside Afghanistan play a vital role; working together ensures Afghan voices are heard. Freedom of expression is essential for a safe, inclusive & prosperous future for all Afghans,” he stated.

The meeting comes as media operations and press freedoms have sharply declined since the Taliban returned to power more than four years ago.

Afghanistan Journalists Center previously reported that authorities have banned the broadcasting of images of living beings in more than 20 provinces since mid-2024.

Many Afghan journalists have left the country or moved their operations abroad due to growing restrictions, threats, and economic pressures facing media organizations.

International organizations continue to warn that shrinking media space in Afghanistan limits access to independent information for millions of citizens.

UK envoy says freedom of expression vital for Afghanistan’s future
read more

U.S. begins paying Afghan refugees in Qatar to return home, veterans and advocates call move a betrayal

By Fidel Rahmati

Khaama Press

The U.S. State Department has started paying Afghans stranded in Qatar to return home, prompting warnings from veterans and advocates about betrayal.

According to Reuters, more than 1,100 Afghans have been stranded at Camp As Sayliyah, a former U.S. Army base in Qatar, since early 2025 after resettlement programs halted under the Trump administration.

The group includes civilian refugees, women who served as U.S. special operations personnel, and family members of U.S. servicemembers, many of whom face security risks if returned.

Assistant Secretary of State S. Paul Kapur told lawmakers that roughly 150 Afghans have accepted payments, which reportedly include $4,500 for main applicants and $1,200 per additional family member, though third-country relocation options remain uncertain.

Veterans and advocacy groups, including AfghanEvac, have condemned the program, warning that the so-called voluntary repatriation amounts to a betrayal of Afghan allies who assisted U.S. forces.

Democrats in Congress have criticized the initiative, calling the payments a coercive measure and highlighting risks to those returning to Taliban-controlled areas.

Camp As Sayliyah has long served as a temporary processing facility for Afghan evacuees pending U.S. resettlement, particularly for those who aided U.S. military operations during the 20-year Afghanistan war.

Prolonged delays and uncertainty have left refugees in limbo, exposing shortcomings in U.S. migration policy and raising international concerns over humanitarian and human rights obligations.

Observers warn that closing the camp and offering financial incentives without secure relocation plans undermines trust in U.S. commitments and risks endangering vulnerable Afghan refugees.

U.S. begins paying Afghan refugees in Qatar to return home, veterans and advocates call move a betrayal
read more

Fazlur Rehman Questions Pakistan’s Afghanistan Policy Amid Rising Tensions

He said it is strange that not even a single pomegranate can be imported from Afghanistan into Pakistan, yet claims are made that terrorists are coming from there.

While tensions between Kabul and Islamabad continue, Maulana Fazlur Rehman, leader of Pakistan’s Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, has questioned his government’s policies toward Afghanistan in an unusually sharp tone.

Raising a sarcastic question, he said it is strange that not even a single pomegranate can be imported from Afghanistan into Pakistan, yet claims are made that terrorists are coming from there.

These remarks, delivered on Sunday at a gathering in Rawalpindi, were not limited to the current situation but also touched on the history of relations between the two countries.

He said that from the era of Zahir Shah to the communist governments, the Mujahideen, and the Islamic Emirate, various governments have come to power in Afghanistan; however, in his view, Pakistan has never been able to establish stable and tension-free relations with Kabul.

In another part of his speech, Maulana Fazlur Rehman added: “You say terrorists are coming from there into Pakistan. Brother, if they are coming, stop them. If they are coming, eliminate them. The strange thing is that an Afghan pomegranate cannot come, a melon cannot come, yet you say terrorists are coming.”

Fazlur Rehman also described insecurity in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan as the result of flawed domestic policies and warned that the scope of this instability has now reached Islamabad as well.

He said: “Now the effects of this situation have reached Islamabad and Rawalpindi too. Even inside mosques, worshippers are being targeted. This means the government lacks authority. Making big statements is easy, and issuing fine declarations is easy. Some people create narratives as if we are the only victims in the world and the only wise ones as well.”

Analysts insist that despite the closure of border crossings between Afghanistan and Pakistan, attributing Pakistan’s internal insecurity to Afghanistan is illogical. In their view, such claims are mostly made to cover up Pakistan’s internal security challenges.

Samiullah Ahmadzai, a political analyst, said: “Despite the fact that Pakistan has security posts along the so-called Durand Line and there is no movement, such claims are still made. These claims are mostly aimed at portraying Afghanistan as an insecure country.”

Another political analyst, Bilal Omar, added: “This actually reflects the weakness of Pakistan’s security institutions. Whenever a crisis emerges inside the country, the responsibility is placed on neighboring countries.”

This comes as Pakistan linked Friday’s deadly ISIS attack at a mosque in Islamabad to Afghanistan. In response, the Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Emirate immediately said that attributing the attack to Afghanistan has no logical basis and cannot conceal Pakistan’s security failures.

Fazlur Rehman Questions Pakistan’s Afghanistan Policy Amid Rising Tensions
read more

Russian Envoy Says No Alternative of Islamic Emirate, Urges Cooperation

Albert P. Khorev said at a seminar organized by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute that there is currently no alternative to the Islamic Emirate in Afghanistan, and that its officials should not be blamed; instead, their perspective should be respected and cooperation should take place.

He said that Russia and other countries in the region are concerned about the security situation in Afghanistan and stressed that regional countries should work together with the Afghan government to improve the situation.

He said: “I believe we can unite and we can further strengthen our efforts altogether in cooperation with Afghanistan government, find some ways and solutions how to more effectively fight terrorism threat.”

In another part of his remarks, Khorev criticized the West, particularly the United States, over sanctions imposed on Afghanistan, saying these sanctions have negatively affected the Islamic Emirate’s governance. He called on the West to lift the sanctions.

According to the Russian ambassador, expanding trade and economic relations with Afghanistan is currently one of Moscow’s priorities, and he believes Central Asian countries and China share the same priority.

The Russian diplomat also said that the closure of routes between Afghanistan and Pakistan is a major obstacle to regional trade.

Russian Envoy Says No Alternative of Islamic Emirate, Urges Cooperation
read more

Over 4 Million People of Afghanistan Will Need Shelter in 2026, UN Warns

By Fidel Rahmati

The UN warns that 4.2 million people of Afghanistan will need shelter in 2026, amid natural disasters and increasing returnee pressures.

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported on Sunday, Febraury 8 that 4.2 million people of Afghanistan will require shelter in 2026.

Humanitarian agencies have prioritized support for 881,000 people, requiring $160.3 million to provide emergency shelters, non-food items, winter aid, and repair damaged homes.

All 34 provinces will receive assistance, with high-priority areas including drought-hit regions, disaster-affected districts, and communities hosting returnees from Pakistan and Iran.

In 2025, 15,000 people were affected by floods, with 90 percent still living in tents or damaged homes due to lack of funding.

Over 24 percent of returnees identify shelter as their main need, highlighting a persistent housing crisis across Afghanistan.

Despite reductions in informal settlements in recent years, around 390,000 families continue to live in nearly 900 temporary sites nationwide.

Recurring natural disasters; including earthquakes, floods, and landslides continue to increase vulnerability and strain humanitarian resources throughout Afghanistan.

OCHA stresses protection for vulnerable groups, especially women, children, and people with disabilities, while negotiating with the Taliban to maintain humanitarian access.

Over 4 Million People of Afghanistan Will Need Shelter in 2026, UN Warns
read more

Pakistan to Deport Nearly 20,000 Afghan Refugees Awaiting U.S. Resettlement

Khaama Press

Pakistan plans to return nearly 20,000 Afghan refugees awaiting relocation to the United States, sharing their information with authorities for immediate deportation.

According to The Nation newspaper, Pakistan has decided to deport thousands of Afghan refugees who have been waiting for resettlement in the U.S.

The federal government will notify senior provincial authorities and police across Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan, Kashmir, Gilgit-Baltistan, and Islamabad to facilitate the returns.

Most of these refugees fled Afghanistan after the previous government fell and have been waiting more than four years for transfer to third countries.

In recent months, Pakistan has already returned some Afghan refugees who were on U.S. resettlement lists, citing doubts about Washington’s commitment to the program.

The U.S. paused Afghan refugee admissions after Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national, shot two U.S. National Guard soldiers near the White House in December.

Following the shooting, President Donald Trump suspended visa issuance for Afghan passport holders indefinitely and ordered a review of existing Afghan immigration cases.

The decision underscores growing frustration in Pakistan over long-term refugee stays and the uncertainty surrounding Afghan resettlement to the United States.

Pakistan to Deport Nearly 20,000 Afghan Refugees Awaiting U.S. Resettlement
read more