Economy Ministry: Afghanistan Not Dependent on Foreign Aid

However, some economic experts believe that significant foundational work has been carried out in recent years compared to the past.

The Ministry of Economy of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, responding to a report by The New York Times, says that national revenue and economic stability in the country are not dependent on foreign assistance.

The ministry’s spokesperson said that unemployment, declining household purchasing power, and climate vulnerability are the main causes of malnutrition and food insecurity, and assured that efforts are underway to address economic and livelihood challenges by relying on the country’s economic capacities and domestic revenue.

Abdul Rahman Habib, spokesperson for the Ministry of Economy, said: “Direct support for farmers, water resource management, support for domestic production and small enterprises, implementation of job-creation programs, and measures to mitigate the risks of climate change and drought are among the key priorities of the relevant ministries to reduce food insecurity.”

Previously, The New York Times reported that after the administration of former US President Donald Trump sharply reduced foreign aid to Afghanistan nearly a year ago, the country faced an unprecedented crisis.

According to the report, about four million children are currently at risk of death due to malnutrition the highest level in the past 25 years. During the same period, 450 health clinics have been closed, increasing the risk of death for newborns, mothers during childbirth, and emergency patients.

Humanitarian needs have also grown following the deportation of 2.8 million Afghan migrants from Iran and Pakistan, while acute hunger has intensified, affecting more than 17 million people around 40 percent of the population an increase of two million compared to last year. Additionally, seven provinces have reached a critical level of food insecurity, the final stage before famine.

Sayed Masoud, a university lecturer, said: “The largest aid Afghanistan has received in its history was wasted. However, we should not think that nothing was achieved. Some progress was made, but it was not proportional to the level of investment that entered Afghanistan.”

The report also cited projections by the Center for Global Development, which estimate that Afghanistan will lose nearly five percent of its national income in 2026 due to declining donor funding.

However, some economic experts believe that significant foundational work has been carried out in recent years compared to the past, and that continuing this trend could lead to self-reliance and free Afghanistan from dependence on foreign aid.

Mohammad Nabi Afghan, an economic analyst, told TOLOnews: “If we attract neighboring countries and implement regional and multi-country projects here, and provide the necessary facilities, we can change the current negative situation. Our economy will grow, we will become self-sufficient, and we will no longer need foreign aid.”

This comes as the United States continued to send nearly one billion dollars annually to Afghanistan even after 2021, but following Donald Trump’s return to the White House, US assistance was suspended by a single decision. Although Washington later resumed aid to other crisis-hit countries, Afghanistan is currently not among them.

Economy Ministry: Afghanistan Not Dependent on Foreign Aid
read more

Pakistani forces kill 177 Baloch militants in 48 hours, the highest toll in decades

By ABDUL SATTAR and MUNIR AHMED

Associated Press

February 2, 2026

Police backed by the military have been conducting raids in several areas against members of the outlawed separatist Baloch Liberation Army since early Saturday, after nearly 200 militants in small groups carried out simultaneous suicide bombings and gun attacks on police stations, civilian homes and security facilities across Balochistan province.

Analysts say the scale of militant deaths in the past 48 hours is the highest in decades.

The militant attacks have drawn widespread condemnation from political leaders across Pakistan, including members of the party led by imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan.

On Monday, Defense Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif said the weekend attacks claimed by BLA killed 33 civilians and 17 security forces. He cited higher civilian casualties from the attacks during a speech to parliament.Asif ruled out any possibility of talks with the BLA, saying no talks would be held with “terrorists” who killed civilians, including women and children, when they attacked residences of Baloch laborers in the port city of Gwadar on Saturday.

On Monday, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi in a statement praised the security forces for killing an additional 22 insurgents. He described those killed as “Indian-backed terrorists.” However, he offered no evidence of Indian involvement, and there was no immediate response from New Delhi.

Though it is Pakistan’s largest province, Balochistan is its least populated, made up largely of high mountains. It’s also a hub for the country’s ethnic Baloch minority, whose members say they face discrimination and exploitation by the central government. That has fueled a separatist insurgency demanding independence. Islamic militants also operate in the province.

Authorities said normalcy was largely returned to the province on Monday, but the train service between Balochistan and the rest of the country remained suspended for a third consecutive day. Provincial authorities suspended train service following the attacks, citing security concerns, and the suspension remains in effect.

In March, at least 31 people were killed when BLA militants attacked the Jaffar express train carrying hundreds of people in Balochistan, taking passengers hostage before security forces launched a rescue operation. All 33 assailants were killed, and the passengers were freed.

The BLA, which is banned in Pakistan, has carried out numerous attacks in recent years, frequently targeting security forces, Chinese interests and infrastructure projects. Authorities say the group has operated with support from the Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, which is allied with Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers.

Ahmed reported from Islamabad.

Pakistani forces kill 177 Baloch militants in 48 hours, the highest toll in decades
read more

4th Doha Process Counter-Narcotics Meeting Held in Kabul

Khaama Press

Officials and international representatives met in Kabul under the Doha Process to strengthen cooperation against narcotics production and trafficking across Afghanistan and the region.

The fourth counter-narcotics working group meeting under the Doha Process was held Wednesday in Kabul with participation of Taliban officials, UN representatives, diplomats, and technical experts.

Hosted by the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan at a Kabul hotel, the meeting included Taliban ministries, international organizations, the European Union, and several countries attending both in person and online.

Taliban officials said a ban on poppy cultivation ordered by their leadership significantly reduced opium production, citing alternative livelihood and addiction treatment programs as part of anti-drug efforts.

They also warned that without international cooperation, rising production and trafficking of synthetic drugs and smuggling of precursor chemicals could create broader regional and global security threats.

The UN-led Doha Process, launched in 2023, provides a structured platform for engagement between the international community and Taliban authorities, focusing on humanitarian, economic, and counter-narcotics cooperation.

Participants stressed continued international coordination and economic support remain essential to prevent renewed drug cultivation while expanding treatment and rehabilitation services across Afghanistan.

4th Doha Process Counter-Narcotics Meeting Held in Kabul
read more

UN Warns ISIS in Iraq and Afghanistan Remains Global Security Threat

Khaama Press

The United Nations has warned that Islamic State (ISIS) and its Khorasan branch in Afghanistan continue to pose a serious threat to regional and global security.

Alexander Zuev, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Counter-Terrorism, told the Security Council that ISIS-K remains one of the most dangerous terror threats in and beyond the region.

He noted that although the number of attacks has declined, ISIS-K continues to rebuild its ranks quickly and recruit supporters through online networks.

Zuev also referenced a recent attack in Kabul claimed by ISIS-K that killed seven people and injured several others, including a child.

Representatives of the United States, Britain, China, and Pakistan echoed concerns during the meeting, calling for continued international cooperation against terrorism threats linked to Afghanistan.

Following territorial defeats in Iraq and Syria, ISIS has shifted operations toward regions including Afghanistan and parts of Africa, where affiliated groups remain active and adaptable.

Meanwhile, Taliban authorities reject claims that ISIS maintains a significant presence in Afghanistan, insisting the group has been defeated and no foreign militant groups operate from Afghanistan territory.

Despite differing assessments, UN officials stress that sustained global coordination is necessary to prevent ISIS and its affiliates from regaining strength and destabilizing the region.

UN Warns ISIS in Iraq and Afghanistan Remains Global Security Threat
read more

Congress Nixes Visas for Afghan Partners, Closing Off a Key Path

President Trump froze a program to allow Afghans who had worked with American troops to come to the United States. Now Congress has quietly scrapped the visas, leaving little hope of reviving them.

Zia Ghafoori stood in the East Room of the White House in 2018, beaming as President Trump thanked him for his “noble service” as an interpreter for a team of Green Berets in Afghanistan at a ceremony honoring their bravery at the battle of Shok Valley.

But last year, Mr. Trump froze the special visa program that gave Mr. Ghafoori and other Afghans who worked with the American government over two decades of war with the Taliban a path to legal status in the United States. The president did so hours after an Afghan national who had fought in a paramilitary group linked to the C.I.A. and entered the United States on a two-year grant of parole in 2021 shot two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., one of them fatally.

Then on Tuesday, Congress quietly closed the door to the program altogether when it cleared a spending package that authorized no new visas for it.

The wind down of the program reflected a rapid political shift on Capitol Hill after the November shooting by Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who did not have a special Afghan visa, but had been granted asylum by the Trump administration. Many Republicans in Congress — even some who had backed the Afghan partners program — quickly fell in line behind Mr. Trump as he vilified the same Afghan partners whom many of them had demanded the Biden administration make every effort to rescue when the United States withdrew from Kabul in 2021.

The fear of backlash from a G.O.P. base that for years has embraced Mr. Trump’s xenophobic statements about migrants — including blanket assertions that Afghans are terrorists, a suggestion he amplified after the National Guard shooting — appears to have overpowered what had been a solid bipartisan consensus around the importance of standing behind Afghans who served alongside Americans during the war.

Republican voters “think that any Afghan that got into the United States is a terrorist,” said Representative Michael McCaul of Texas, who was the top Republican on the Foreign Affairs Committee during the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and has announced his retirement from Congress. While he said he was all for more vetting of Afghans entering the country, Mr. McCaul said any person who qualified for a Special Immigrant Visa would have worked closely with the U.S. personnel.

“So to say there are terrorists — when they actually worked alongside our military and intelligence community to kill terrorists — doesn’t make any sense,” Mr. McCaul said.

Now, Afghans with pending applications have no sense of when or whether the Trump administration might resume issuing visas. That has left many of them who are still in Afghanistan or living as refugees in another country in jeopardy.

“These Afghan allies were the ones who stood with their sons and daughters overseas,” Mr. Ghafoori said in a recent interview. “They carried their wounded, and they saved their lives.”

Authorizing more visas over the years had at times required backroom wrangling. But there was always a contingent of Republicans, many of them veterans, who demanded that Washington stand by its promise to bring Afghan partners safely to the United States.

But in an election year, and with a president who is quick to endorse challengers to primary members of his own party who cross him, no Republican has called for Congress to provide special Afghan visas for another year, or publicly opposed Mr. Trump’s indefinite pause on the program. They said nothing to dispute the president’s claims, made without evidence, that a breakdown in vetting led to the National Guard shooting.

Still, there have been no proposals from the Trump administration or congressional Republicans to increase vetting of special Afghan visa applicants.

“They’re just slamming the door shut,” Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement. “Stranding vetted S.I.V. applicants or sending Afghan families back into the hands of the Taliban isn’t about security; it’s a betrayal of the promises we made to those who risked their lives for the United States.”

“There’s a lot of veterans on the Republican side who would do it,” said Representative Jason Crow of Colorado, a former Army Ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. “They unfortunately don’t have the courage right now to vote publicly.”

The State Department told Congress last summer that there were around 9,000 Special Immigrant Visas still available to issue to Afghans. But the Trump administration has given Congress no indication it plans to allocate those visas to tens of thousands of outstanding applicants. Last July, there were over 1,400 Afghans in the final stages of the vetting process, and over 100,000 more still submitting documents, including a recommendation from a top military or diplomatic official.

In a statement, the State Department said the pause on the special visa program was to ensure proper vetting and to confirm the identities and visa eligibility of applicants. The department would not say whether the remaining visas would ultimately be issued.

Some Republicans said after the shooting that they were still pushing to include more visas in the State Department spending bill. Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks, an Iowa Republican who last year had endorsed including thousands of new visas, said it was now “vastly more difficult.”

Republicans blame the Biden administration for leaving Afghan partners stranded in Afghanistan and evacuating others to a third country where they were told they would be processed and brought to the United States. Those who called for thousands more visas in the past said they have not forgotten those Afghans.

“I’m committed to finding a pathway forward to help our Afghan partners who put their lives on the line alongside U.S. service members, while maintaining rigorous vetting and ensuring accountability at every step,” said Representative Zach Nunn of Iowa, a Republican and combat veteran who flew missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Legal experts said that while Mr. Trump cannot unilaterally end the program, it is unclear what, if any, levers Congress has to force his administration to issue the remaining visas to applicants, some of whom have already waited years and would be left with no other avenue to reach the United States if they did not receive them.

Mr. Crow warned that it would be a “moral stain” on the country if lawmakers failed to revive the program and “turn our back on our partners from Afghanistan.”

Congress Nixes Visas for Afghan Partners, Closing Off a Key Path
read more

In Afghanistan, a Trail of Hunger and Death Behind U.S. Aid Cuts

By Elian Peltier, Yaqoob Akbary and Safiullah Padshah

The New York Times

Feb. 5, 2026

Afghanistan has plunged deeper into a crisis marked by levels of child hunger unseen in 25 years and the closure of almost 450 health centers.

The U.S. aid cuts in Afghanistan were as sudden as they were brutal. Even after the U.S. withdrawal and the end of the war in 2021, the United States continued pouring money into Afghanistan. From the 2021 Taliban takeover until last year, Washington had provided nearly $1 billion annually — over a third of all aid flowing into one of the world’s poorest countries. That funding has all but evaporated with the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The agency’s programs once helped clear landscapes scarred by war and mines, diversify crops and keep millions from hunger. Four million children are now at risk of dying from malnutrition, according to the World Food Program, the most in a quarter-century.

“The U.S. withdrawal exacerbated an already bad situation,” said Sherine Ibrahim, a former head of the Afghanistan office of the International Rescue Committee, which received three-quarters of its funding from the U.S. government. “No other donor has stepped in and no one will in those proportions.”

Nearly 450 health centers closed because of the cuts, including a tiny white building in the drought-stricken village of Nalej, where Malika Ghullami safely gave birth to two children in past years and was pregnant again with twins last year.

After the midwife and nutritionist left Nalej, however, Ms. Ghullami had to be driven on a spine-jarring dirt track to another clinic more than an hour away when she felt the first labor pains one morning this winter.

One twin was stillborn, and the other survived only a few hours.

While other factors may have contributed, Ms. Ghullami also blamed her inability to go to the distant clinic for regular checkups. Other mothers in Nalej’s area recounted losing children after struggling to reach distant clinics, and nurses say they are treating more women who lost blood during long journeys or delivered in taxis.

“They were solving our issues,” Ms. Ghullami, 34, said of the staff in the now-shuttered clinic in Nalej. “Now we’re left on our own.”

While funding has shrunk, needs have increased. More than 2.8 million Afghan refugees were expelled or forcibly returned from Iran and Pakistan last year and now live in communities struggling to absorb them. Two deadly earthquakes that struck the country last summer and fall left thousands homeless, often in isolated valleys.

Map locates the provinces of Daikundi, Kunar and Kandahar provinces on Afghanistan, along with the cities of Kabul and Kandahar and the village of Nalej.

Other international institutions, the Afghan government and private businesses have tried to fill the gap, but they are nowhere close to matching the size of American aid. The crisis has been exacerbated by smaller but still painful reductions in aid from European countries.

“We can only provide them with cash,” said Naimatullah Ulfat, a government official in the southern province of Kandahar. “The food, the clothes and other forms of assistance nongovernmental organizations were providing, we can’t. It’s going to be very difficult.”

The Trump administration has resumed sending aid to some crisis-hit countries, but not Afghanistan. A bill currently in the Senate would bar the State Department and U.S.-backed international organizations from funding humanitarian programs that might benefit the Taliban, even indirectly.

Hundreds of Health Centers Wiped Out

The isolated province of Daikundi has lost many of its health clinics to the U.S. aid cuts.

The clinic in Nalej, surrounded by parched fields of almond and mulberry trees, was a lifeline for 850 families. The villagers say its closure has hurt children the most.

Zakia, 3 months old, has been vomiting since birth and her condition is deteriorating, said her mother, Sharifa Khawari. For weeks, she hoped her husband would bring back enough money from the coal mine where he worked to finance a taxi ride to the nearest clinic. But she said his pay was barely enough to put food on the table.

The loss of the clinic erased years of monitoring that had saved children’s lives.

“When I was giving birth, we were losing babies,” said Nik Bakht, Ms. Khawari’s mother-in-law. “One would hope that younger mothers these days wouldn’t face that.”

Other clinics are struggling to stay open. Benazir Muhammadi, 32, a nurse at a clinic run by an Afghan nonprofit, MOVE, in a remote valley of Daikundi, worked without pay for three months after U.S. funds ran out. The clinic had to let go of its nutritionist.

“Proximity health care centers are an absolute necessity,” she said. “You simply cannot wait when you’re about to deliver.”

Rising Malnutrition

In 2024, the United States funded over half of Afghanistan’s nutrition and agricultural programs. Food insecurity has skyrocketed since last year’s cuts. More than 17 million Afghans — 40 percent of the population — now face acute levels of hunger, two million more than last year.

Seven provinces face critical food insecurity, the final stage before famine, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a group of international organizations that the United Nations and aid agencies rely on to monitor global hunger. None were at this level a year ago.

Malnutrition is also hitting cities, affecting the most vulnerable — the very young, sick and elderly — first, as it does elsewhere. Muhammad Ali, 9 months old, was one of a dozen toddlers wailing or dozing in a Kabul nutrition ward on a recent morning. He was too weak to ingest milk, said his mother, Karima Malikzada. Her husband’s meager income as a housekeeper means they often eat only once a day..

Afghanistan is projected to lose 5 percent of its national income in 2026 as donors slash aid, according to the Center for Global Development. Researchers warn that will have long-term consequences for children, causing malnutrition that will stunt their development.

“That is a 20 to 30-year impact, not a one-year budget decision,” said Mohammad Mustafa Raheal, a research fellow at Lund University in Sweden who studies humanitarian aid delivery in Afghanistan. “You can’t just ‘switch the aid back on’ later and undo that damage.”

One Shock After Another

The aid cuts have also crippled the response to natural disasters. Months after a summer earthquake killed over 2,200 people in eastern Afghanistan, families whose homes had collapsed still live in tents battered by freezing winds — a mosaic of white dots amid destroyed villages and cornfields.

On a recent morning in Kunar Province, an International Rescue Committee team of a half-dozen health professionals visited Badgor, an isolated village hit by the quake. It was the last mobile team that the organization has kept operating since the cuts, which forced it to disband 33 others. Under a large parasol blocking the winter sun, one of its members examined children who arrived with fever, chest pains and diarrhea. Tuberculosis cases were ballooning; so was despair.

“The aftermath of the earthquake weighs on them,” Sameena Khan Sadat, a mental health counselor, said in between consultations. “They think about it day and night, but we don’t have medication for PTSD or depression.”

Humanitarian groups also face an increasingly hostile environment. The Taliban have barred Afghan women from working in U.N. offices while also diverting the remaining aid to supportive communities, according to SIGAR, an independent agency established by Congress to oversee U.S.-funded projects in Afghanistan.

“The Taliban use every means at their disposal, including force, to ensure that aid goes where they want it to go, as opposed to where donors intend,” SIGAR wrote in a report last year.

Humanitarian workers say aid cuts have hampered their ability to survey the needs of Afghanistan’s population. A major concern remains the returnees from Iran and Pakistan.

At the Pakistan border on a recent morning, a trickle of Afghans passed a U.N. sign reading “Welcome to your sweet country.” Most nonprofit offices there were closed.

“The cuts hit us hardest just as returns and needs increased,” said Ahmad Shah Irshad, a U.N. refugee agency supervisor at a sprawling transit center with hundreds of tents and shelters near the border. “We don’t know what 2026 will be made of.”

In Afghanistan, a Trail of Hunger and Death Behind U.S. Aid Cuts
read more

Pakistan says it has killed 145 ‘Indian-backed terrorists’ in Balochistan after deadly attacks

By ABDUL SATTAR and MUNIR AHMED

Associated Press

QUETTA, Pakistan (AP) — Pakistani police and military forces killed over a 100 “Indian-backed terrorists ” in counterterrorism operations across the restive southwestern province of Balochistan over the past 40 hours, government officials said on Sunday, a day after coordinated suicide and gun attacks killed 33 people, mostly civilians.

The raids began early Saturday at multiple locations across Balochistan, and left 18 civilians, including five women and three children, and 15 security personnel dead, authorities said.

Sarfraz Bugti, the provincial chief minister, told reporters in Quetta that troops and police officers responded swiftly, killing 145 members of “ Fitna al-Hindustan,” a phrase the government uses for the allegedly Indian-backed outlawed Baloch Liberation Army, or BLA. The number of militants killed over the past two days was the highest in decades, he said.

“The bodies of these 145 killed terrorists are in our custody, and some of them are Afghan nationals,” he said. Bugti claimed that the ”Indian-backed terrorists” wanted to take hostages but failed to make it to the city center.

He spoke alongside senior government official Hamza Shafqat, who often oversees such operations against insurgents in the province, and praised the military, police and paramilitary forces for repelling the assaults.

Militant attacks erupted on Saturday in a resource-rich region where Pakistan is seeking to attract foreign investment in mining and minerals. In September 2025, a U.S. metals company signed a $500 million investment agreement with Pakistan, a month after the U.S. State Department designated BLA and its armed wing as a foreign terrorist organization.

Residents described scenes of panic after a suicide bombing killed several police officers on Saturday.

“(It) was a very scary day in the history of Quetta,” said Khan Muhammad, a local resident. “Armed men were roaming openly on the roads before security forces arrived.”

Bugti repeatedly accused India and Afghanistan of backing the assailants and said senior leaders of the BLA, which claimed responsibility for the latest attacks in Balochistan, were operating from Afghan territory. Both Kabul and New Delhi deny the allegations.

He said on Sunday Afghanistan’s Taliban had pledged under the 2020 Doha agreement not to allow Afghan soil to be used as a base for attacking other countries, but “unfortunately, the Afghan soil was still being used against Pakistan.”

Tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan have persisted since early October when Pakistan carried out airstrikes on what it described as Pakistani Taliban hideouts inside Afghanistan, killing dozens of alleged insurgents.

Bugti said militants stormed the home of a Baloch laborer in Gwadar and killed five women and three children. He condemned the killings. He said the attackers had planned to seize hostages after storming government offices in Quetta’s high-security zone but were thwarted. “We were aware of their plans, and our forces were prepared,” he said.

The BLA is banned in Pakistan and has carried out numerous attacks in recent years, often targeting security forces, Chinese interests and infrastructure projects.

Authorities say the group has operated with support from the Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, or TTP. The TTP, a separate group, is allied with Afghanistan’s Taliban, who returned to power in August 2021.

Balochistan has long faced a separatist insurgency by ethnic Baloch groups seeking greater autonomy or independence from Pakistan’s central government. The BLA regularly targets Pakistani security forces and has also attacked civilians, including Chinese nationals among the thousands working on various projects in the province.__

Ahmed reported from Islamabad.

Pakistan says it has killed 145 ‘Indian-backed terrorists’ in Balochistan after deadly attacks
read more

Mujahid: ‘Inclusive Government’ Failed to Bring Stability to Afghanistan

According to him, the new code is more comprehensive and practical than before, enabling judicial processes to be carried out with greater clarity.

Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, told TOLOnews that over the past four decades the people of Afghanistan have experienced various governments and political systems; however, according to him, what was presented as an “inclusive government” failed to bring stability, calm, and lasting peace to the country.

He emphasized that political differences and successive wars have been the main causes of the suffering and misery of the Afghan people, adding that citizens can achieve real peace only under a single system with strong commitment and a sense of responsibility.

Zabihullah Mujahid said: “We experienced different governments; those issues that were previously referred to as an inclusive government did not bring stability to Afghanistan. We continuously witnessed wars and hardships. Afghanistan needs to live for some time together, free from political differences.”

Referring to the endorsement of the new penal code in Afghanistan, the Islamic Emirate’s spokesperson said the code was drafted to clarify the working procedures of judges and to facilitate the handling of cases.

According to him, the new code is more comprehensive and practical than before, enabling judicial processes to be carried out with greater clarity.

Mujahid added that much of the criticism in this regard comes from individuals who lack a proper understanding of Islamic Sharia or are influenced by external viewpoints.

He said: “A penal code existed before as well, but it was general. The new code has been drafted in a clearer, more detailed, and simpler manner so that judges can resolve details more quickly and accurately.”

In another part of the interview, the spokesperson addressed Afghanistan–Pakistan relations, stressing that Kabul does not seek war or instability in any country, especially Pakistan. According to him, peace and stability in Pakistan are in Afghanistan’s interest, and the Islamic Emirate’s policy is based on non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries.

Political analyst Samiullah Ahmadzai said: “The Islamic Emirate has always assured that it does not interfere in the internal affairs of any country, and Pakistan’s issues are considered an internal matter of that country.”

Similarly, Amir Mohammad Gran, a former Afghan diplomat to Pakistan, added: “Afghanistan has never supported war in neighboring countries, because war only leads to destruction, human casualties, and instability.”

In conclusion, Zabihullah Mujahid referred to the role of the United Nations, saying the organization should not take on the responsibilities of the Afghan people or set conditions for the country’s future. In his view, the UN should focus on its own responsibilities and facilitate Afghanistan’s enjoyment of its rights as an independent country within the framework of the organization.

Mujahid: ‘Inclusive Government’ Failed to Bring Stability to Afghanistan
read more

Higher Education Minister: Conditions Now in Place for Implementing Sharia

The senior official of the Islamic Emirate accused critics of the current laws of being unaware of Islamic law.

The Minister of Higher Education of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, speaking in Paktia province, emphasized the role of religious scholars in reforming society, promoting Islamic values, and defending the Islamic system.

Sheikh Neda Mohammad Nadim said that before the Islamic Emirate came to power, the implementation of Islamic Sharia faced serious challenges, but now favorable conditions have been created in the country for the enforcement of Islamic Sharia.

Sheikh Neda Mohammad Nadim added: “They are paid agents of foreigners and say whatever they are told, under the names of mullahs, doctors, or university professors. Our professors and those who have remained in the country, whether they are university lecturers, students, or engaged in any other work, respect their system, Islam, and their beliefs and religion.”

In another part of his remarks, the Minister of Higher Education addressed criticism of the approved penal law, saying that all current laws are Islamic.

The senior official of the Islamic Emirate accused critics of the current laws of being unaware of Islamic law.

He said: “In the past, Islamic rulings were violated here, but today, with full confidence, you can announce and implement any ruling that is Islamic and Sharia-based. You can call wrong what is wrong and right what is right, and no one can stop you. Make use of this opportunity.”

Earlier, the Ministry of Justice had also warned that any protest against Islamic laws drafted in accordance with Sharia would be considered opposition to Islamic Sharia and would be subject to legal action.

Higher Education Minister: Conditions Now in Place for Implementing Sharia
read more

Drug Smuggling Persists Along Afghanistan–Tajikistan Border After Deadly Clash, Official Confirms

Khaama Press

Officials say drug traffickers continue exploiting the long Afghanistan–Tajikistan border as clashes erupt, underscoring persistent regional challenges to counter narcotics smuggling efforts.

Zabihullah Mujahid, a spokesperson for Kabul administration acknowledged that narcotics smuggling into Tajikistan continues despite ongoing counter-drug efforts along the shared border.

Tajik border forces reported a clash with armed smugglers along the frontier, saying three suspected traffickers were killed during the confrontation.

Afghan officials said efforts are underway to improve border control and prevent drug trafficking, noting the long and difficult terrain complicates enforcement.

Authorities from both sides are said to be coordinating to address border security issues and reduce illegal crossings used by traffickers.

Tajik security officials also reported seizing weapons and several bags containing dozens of packages of hashish and opium following the operation.

Afghanistan has long been one of the world’s largest producers of opium, with trafficking routes extending through Central Asia toward Russia and European markets.

The Afghanistan–Tajikistan border, stretching over 1,300 kilometers across mountainous terrain, has historically been difficult to monitor, allowing smuggling networks to operate.

Despite official cooperation, recurring clashes and continued seizures highlight the ongoing challenge of securing the border and curbing regional drug trafficking networks.

Drug Smuggling Persists Along Afghanistan–Tajikistan Border After Deadly Clash, Official Confirms
read more