Pakistan Shelling in Kunar Kills 2 Children Amid Fresh Border Tensions

Two children were killed and six other children were wounded after Pakistani forces shelled the Sarkano district of Afghanistan’s eastern Kunar province, according to reports.

The attack reportedly took place around 5 p.m. on Wednesday and struck civilian areas, including residential homes, deepening concerns over the growing human toll of the border conflict.

Bakhtar News claimed that several civilian houses were damaged in the artillery fire, while local officials said two of the wounded children were transferred to a hospital in neighboring Nangarhar for urgent treatment. The latest incident adds to a rising number of civilian casualties in eastern Afghanistan as cross-border exchanges continue.

The attack came only days after Taliban deputy spokesperson Hamdullah Fitrat said earlier Pakistani rocket fire in Kunar had killed one person and injured 16 others, most of them women and children. That earlier shelling, along with the latest strike, suggests that the security situation along the frontier remains highly unstable despite diplomatic contacts.

The latest violence comes amid one of the sharpest escalations in relations between Pakistan and the Taliban administration since 2021. Islamabad has repeatedly accused Kabul of allowing militants, especially Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), to operate from Afghanistan soil, while Taliban officials reject the accusation and say Pakistan is targeting civilians inside Afghanistan.

The fighting has also triggered a widening humanitarian crisis across several Afghanistan border provinces. According to UN-linked and aid reporting, tens of thousands of families have been displaced by artillery fire, airstrikes, and armed clashes in Kunar, Nangarhar, Khost, Paktika, and other affected areas, with many communities facing repeated displacement and disrupted access to aid.

The Kunar-Nangarhar border belt has long remained one of the most sensitive flashpoints between Afghanistan and Pakistan, but recent weeks have seen a more dangerous turn, with both sides increasingly relying on heavy weapons, cross-border shelling, and military accusations rather than local de-escalation channels.

At the same time, Pakistan and Taliban officials have opened fresh talks in Urumqi, China, in what diplomats describe as a new effort to secure a ceasefire and prevent further deterioration. China is trying to bring both sides back to dialogue, but the continuation of shelling during the talks shows how fragile and uncertain the peace process remains.

The deaths of two children in Kunar underline how civilians continue to pay the highest price in the worsening border conflict. Even as officials discuss peace in China, developments on the ground suggest that trust between the two sides remains dangerously low.

Unless the latest diplomacy produces a credible ceasefire and enforcement mechanism, more cross-border attacks are likely to follow. For residents of eastern Afghanistan, especially children and displaced families, each new round of shelling brings not only fear and loss, but also growing uncertainty about safety and survival.

Pakistan Shelling in Kunar Kills 2 Children Amid Fresh Border Tensions
read more

AP Exclusive: Pakistan and Afghan Taliban officials meet in China for ceasefire talks

Associated Press
April 1, 2026

But even as the talks were held, Afghanistan accused Pakistan of firing mortars into its territory.

Representatives from the two countries were meeting in Urumqi, in northern China, the officials told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief the media. The first round of talks concluded on Wednesday afternoon and were expected to continue on Thursday, they said.

China has not commented. Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs neither confirmed nor denied the talks were taking place.

An Afghan official said the five-member Afghan delegation in Urumqi consisted of two officials from the foreign ministry and one each from the defense and interior ministries and from the country’s intelligence agency. The official provided the information on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose details to the press.

The talks in Urumqi are seen as a potential relief for millions of people in Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan, the sources in Pakistan said, adding they may last for days and were only the beginning of a peace process between the two sides.

Farid Dehqan, a police spokesman for the eastern Afghan province of Kunar, said Pakistan had fired mortars into Afghan territory late Wednesday, killing two civilians and wounding six others, including four children. He said the shelling was ongoing two hours after it started.

The Pakistani army did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

‘Verification mechanism’

According to the sources, the latest round of talks began after both sides accepted China’s offer to mediate to end the fighting. The two sides will continue their talks on Thursday.

China has urged both sides to resume dialogue since late February, and its special envoy, Yue Xiaoyong, met his Pakistani counterpart, Mohammad Sadiq, last month after visiting Kabul.

Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of providing a safe haven for militants who carry out attacks inside Pakistan, especially for the Pakistani Taliban. The group is separate but allied with the Afghan Taliban, which took over Afghanistan in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of U.S.-led troops. Kabul denies the charge.

Pakistan’s former special envoy for Afghanistan, Asif Durrani, expressed hope that the talks, if officially confirmed, would lead to substantive progress.

“If both sides reach an agreement as a result of reported talks, the critical issue will be a verification mechanism to ensure Afghan territory is not used for attacks against Pakistan,” he said.

The fighting since February has been the most severe between Afghanistan and Pakistan in decades. Shortly after clashes began, Pakistan declared it was in “open war” with Afghanistan, with repeated cross-border clashes as well as airstrikes inside Afghanistan, including several in the Afghan capital Kabul.

Afghanistan said a Pakistani airstrike last month hit a drug-treatment center in Kabul, killing more than 400 people. The death toll could not be independently confirmed. Pakistan has disputed the claim and denied targeting civilians, saying it struck an ammunition depot.

Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar told the AP at the time that Pakistan had “only targeted terrorist infrastructure” in Kabul, not any hospital, saying: “We have just gone after the Afghan Taliban regime, their military setups, their terrorist infrastructure, and all the setups which are supporting or promoting terrorists.”

Qatari-mediated ceasefire

Although the two sides agreed to a temporary truce during the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr, fighting later resumed at a lower intensity compared with the heavy clashes seen in February and March, when Pakistan’s air force repeatedly targeted what it said were Pakistani Taliban positions and Afghan military sites. Afghanistan has said the airstrikes hit civilian areas.

The two sides have a long history of tense relations, but the recent violence has alarmed the international community, particularly because militant groups such as al-Qaida and the Islamic State group, remain present in the region and have sought to regroup.

The latest fighting also undermined a Qatari-mediated ceasefire reached in October, which had halted earlier clashes that killed dozens of civilians, security personnel and militants. The two sides dispute casualty figures. Another recent round of talks in Saudi Arabia remained inconclusive.

Previous peace talks held in Istanbul in November failed to produce a lasting agreement.

It remains unclear who is representing Pakistan and Afghanistan in the latest round of talks in China, according to the officials.___

Becatoros and Afghan reported from Kabul, Afghanistan.

AP Exclusive: Pakistan and Afghan Taliban officials meet in China for ceasefire talks
read more

Torkham Border Reopens for Return of Afghan Migrants

The Torkham border crossing has reopened for the return of Afghan migrants from Pakistan, easing movement at one of the busiest and most politically sensitive crossings between the two countries.

Local authorities in Nangarhar said the crossing reopened on Tuesday, allowing Afghan migrants to return from Pakistan. Officials said the Omari camp at Torkham is prepared to receive returnees and manage the flow of families crossing back into Afghanistan.

The reopening follows a brief closure after the route had been temporarily opened only to be shut again following a shooting incident in which a Pakistani border soldier was wounded. Afghan officials have not said how long the crossing will remain open this time, leaving uncertainty for many families waiting to cross.

The crossing is currently being used mainly for migrant returns rather than normal trade or passenger movement. Pakistan has in recent weeks resumed deportations of undocumented Afghans under a controlled repatriation mechanism, with border authorities and immigration agencies overseeing the process.

The reopening comes at a time of heightened strain between the two neighbors, with border tensions and security incidents repeatedly disrupting civilian movement. For thousands of Afghans facing detention, deportation or uncertainty in Pakistan, even a temporary opening of Torkham carries major humanitarian importance.

Torkham is one of the most important land crossings between Afghanistan and Pakistan and serves as a key route for people, trade and emergency movement. Closures there often affect not only migrants and daily wage workers, but also supply chains, medical travel and broader economic activity on both sides of the border.

The latest reopening also comes amid Pakistan’s broader campaign to remove undocumented Afghans, a policy that has drawn concern from aid agencies and rights groups. The United Nations has warned that forced or rushed returns could place already vulnerable Afghan families under additional pressure at a time of economic hardship and instability inside Afghanistan.

Torkham Border Reopens for Return of Afghan Migrants
read more

UN Says Rights and Living Conditions in Afghanistan Are Worsening

Khaama Press

A new United Nations report says living conditions in Afghanistan are deteriorating sharply, with women and girls bearing the brunt of deepening repression and poverty.

The United Nations has said conditions in Afghanistan worsened significantly between August 2025 and January 2026, particularly for women and girls. The report, presented Monday at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, said nearly every area of civilian life, from education and work to healthcare and freedom of movement has come under growing strain.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said about 21.9 million people; nearly half of Afghanistan’s population — will need humanitarian assistance this year. The report said the crisis has been aggravated by falling international aid, the return of roughly three million migrants from neighboring countries and the continuing effects of drought and economic collapse.

According to the report, since the Taliban took over, girls remain barred from education beyond sixth grade and women continue to face sweeping restrictions on university study, employment, public services and freedom of movement. The UN said these measures have had a broad and deeply harmful impact on Afghanistan society, while also worsening poverty and dependence across households.

The report also pointed to growing pressure on free expression, saying journalists have been arbitrarily detained and women writers’ works removed from libraries. It further documented the continued use of punishments such as public executions and floggings, which the UN described as serious human rights violations.

The UN said a 48-hour internet shutdown in 2025 also disrupted vital services, including banking and healthcare, compounding daily hardship for ordinary Afghans. Türk described the situation as a “graveyard of human rights,” warning that millions are now living in extreme poverty without reliable access to food, water, education or medical care.

Afghanistan was already facing one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises before the latest deterioration. UN agencies have repeatedly warned that years of conflict, economic isolation, climate shocks and collapsing public services have left the country exceptionally vulnerable to further instability.

The report’s findings also come as international concern grows over forced and large-scale returns of Afghans from neighboring countries. Aid agencies have warned that additional returns could put even more pressure on already overstretched communities, services and humanitarian operations inside Afghanistan.

The United Nations has called on the Taliban to reverse discriminatory policies, restore women’s rights, end executions, and guarantee basic freedoms. It also urged the international community to prevent forced deportations of Afghan refugees and support international accountability mechanisms for rights violations.

UN Says Rights and Living Conditions in Afghanistan Are Worsening
read more

Death toll in Afghanistan flooding increases to 28, authorities say

Associated Press
March 30, 2026

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Afghan authorities said Monday that the death toll from severe weather that has struck swathes of the country over the past four days has increased to 28, with 49 people injured. Dozens of people have died from extreme weather in the country so far this year.

Storms and heavy rainfall over the past few days across several provinces have led to severe flooding, landslides and lightning strikes, the Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority said, adding that the figures could increase as more details become available.

The severe weather has destroyed 130 homes and damaged a further 436, while it has also killed more than 240 animals, wiped out 93 kilometers (58 miles) of roads and destroyed irrigation canals and agricultural land, the authority said. In all, 1,130 families have been affected, it added.

Earlier this year, heavy snowfall and flash floods left dozens of people dead across the country.

Afghanistan is highly vulnerable to extreme weather events, with snow and heavy rain that trigger flash floods, often killing dozens, or even hundreds, of people at a time. In 2024, more than 300 people died in springtime flash floods.

Decades of conflict, coupled with poor infrastructure, a struggling economy, deforestation and the intensifying effects of climate change have amplified the impact of such disasters, particularly in remote areas where many homes are built of mud and offer limited protection against sudden deluges or heavy snowfall.
Death toll in Afghanistan flooding increases to 28, authorities say
read more

Left in limbo, Afghans who served with U.S. forces fear Trump could send them back to the Taliban

By  and 
NBC News
March 29, 2026

On a former U.S. military base in Qatar, Afghans who supported the United States in its 20-year war against the Taliban have been left in limbo, living in windowless shipping containers far from the new lives they were once promised in the U.S.

Now, the Trump administration is presenting them with a stark choice: move to an unspecified third country or return to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, where they potentially face persecution, imprisonment or death.

Camp As Sayliyah, located outside Doha, hosts more than 1,100 Afghan men, women and children, most of whom have been approved for U.S. resettlement after extensive vetting. Instead, the State Department says everyone will be removed from the camp by March 31, making it the latest casualty in the Trump administration’s efforts to block virtually all paths to the U.S. for Afghan allies.

The camp is the only Afghan refugee site run directly by the U.S. government, with its residents among thousands of people stranded across Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere since Trump returned to office and halted all refugee resettlement. Days before the State Department’s self-imposed deadline, they say they have been given almost no information about what will happen to them next.

The people at Camp As Sayliyah include former members of the Afghan special forces, interpreters and others who worked with the U.S. military, and relatives of U.S. service members and veterans. Their situation has become even more urgent with the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, as the camp is rattled by Tehran’s retaliatory missile strikes on a nearby U.S. air base.

Afghanistan is also engaged in its own deadly conflict with Pakistan, with Pakistani airstrikes killing civilians in Kabul and elsewhere.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s a million dollars,” said Mohammad, who asked not to be identified by his full name out of concern for his family’s safety. “How am I going to trade my dad’s life or my brother’s or my sister’s life for, I don’t know, a billion dollars?”

A State Department spokesperson said Camp As Sayliyah is “a legacy of the Biden administration’s attempt to move as many Afghans to America as possible — in many cases, without proper vetting.”

While the Trump administration has no plans to force anyone back to Afghanistan, the spokesperson said, “it is not appropriate or humane to keep this group of individuals on the platform indefinitely.”

Moving the camp population to third countries is “a positive resolution that provides safety for these remaining people to start a new life outside of Afghanistan,” the spokesperson said.

Mohammad, who was gravely wounded in Afghanistan as a combat interpreter for the U.S. military and enlisted in the Army after moving to Texas, said he felt “betrayed — not by my fellow battle buddies, but by the administration.”

While he remains proud of his service, he says his parents and siblings were targeted in Afghanistan because of it, and later evacuated to Qatar by the U.S. government. He says America has a duty to protect his relatives instead of “handing my family over to the Taliban.”

‘What are they going to do with us?’

Camp As Sayliyah was the “flagship relocation camp” for people fleeing Afghanistan after the U.S. withdrawal, said Shawn VanDiver, president of the San Diego-based advocacy group AfghanEvac.

It was a place where they could safely wait as final preparations were made for their U.S. resettlement, he added, and a symbol of the promise America made to Afghans who risked their lives in the conflict.

Now, it is little more than a “prison camp,” said VanDiver, who has visited the site multiple times. Residents are not allowed to leave the camp, where they live in windowless shipping containers designed for temporary lodging.

While moving the Afghan refugees to third countries may address immediate safety concerns amid the Iran war, it “cannot be the final step,” AfghanEvac said in a statement.

Staying long term in a third country is not a good option, VanDiver said, with no guarantee that those countries wouldn’t just send people back to Afghanistan.

“It’s untenable for a lot of reasons, but mostly because it’s the wrong thing to do,” he said.

The Trump administration has not publicly confirmed any third countries that have agreed to accept people from the camp, and denies that Afghan allies face being repatriated against their will.

“Some have gone of their own volition, but we are not forcing anybody,” Assistant Secretary of State S. Paul Kapur told lawmakers at a congressional hearing last month.

He said he believed about 150 Afghans had accepted the payments and that he did not know what had happened to them.

Those still at the camp struggle to fill their time, resting in the middle of the day to avoid the desert heat and roaming streets that are named after U.S. states to help them learn about what was supposed to be their new home. Schooling is limited, especially for older students.

Twice in the past year, Iranian strikes have hit nearby in Qatar — once last June in retaliation for U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, and again during the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran that began Feb. 28.

The camp offers poor protection against the strikes, said VanDiver, whose group received multiple recordings from “terrified” residents of missiles being intercepted over their heads.

The arrival of Afghan allies to the U.S. had already slowed to a crawl as the Trump administration reshapes the U.S. immigration system. But their hopes were further dashed in November when a shooting in Washington killed one National Guard member and seriously injured another.

The suspect, identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, is an Afghan national who served alongside U.S. troops as part of an elite CIA-backed unit in Afghanistan. Lakanwal, who pleaded not guilty to nine federal charges last month, was granted asylum by the Trump administration last year after arriving in the U.S. during the Biden administration.

The Trump administration imposed harsher restrictions for Afghans after the attack, halting asylum decisions, suspending visa issuance for all Afghan nationals and moving to detain refugees already in the country.

Afghans at Camp As Sayliyah condemned the attack, but say it was the act of one individual.

“We want to ask the American government not to link the crime of a single Afghan to all Afghans,” said a woman surnamed Salimi, a lawyer who has been at the camp with her husband and two sons, ages 2 and 4, for more than a year.

Salimi, who asked to be identified only by her last name because of security concerns, was approved for U.S. resettlement because her legal work put her at risk of persecution by the Taliban.

She had her own legal office, mostly representing women “who were poor, who were physically abused, who were pursuing divorce.”

Many of her clients’ husbands were members of the Taliban, some of whom were imprisoned for physical abuse or other crimes, she said.

The night the Taliban returned to power, Salimi said, she got a call from an unknown number.

“You separated my wife from me and now she’s married to another man and has another life,” said the man on the other end of the line. “You have to pay the price.”

Soon, Salimi heard the Taliban was looking for her. Her office was closed, as she focused on keeping a low profile and finding a way out.

She was eventually able to apply for a U.S. visa, a process she said took seven or eight months, including security checks.

As she flew to Qatar in January 2025, Salimi believed her family’s future in the U.S. was finally secure, but Trump’s return to the White House just two weeks later upended their plans, with refugee resettlement halted and Afghan nationals later barred from entering the U.S.

“Facing an uncertain future makes our mind and spirit get worse day by day,” Salimi said. “What’s going to happen to our future? What are they going to do with us?”

Women in particular have suffered under the Taliban, who have barred them from school beyond the sixth grade, banned their voices and bare faces in public and suspended laws against rape and child and forced marriage.

Breaking a promise

The U.S. government’s about-face on Afghan allies and their families has pained veterans such as retired Army Lt. Col. Mariah Smith, who served three tours in Afghanistan.

Translators such as Mohammad “were absolutely vital to success,” Smith said, making them “a primary target” of the Taliban.

“There was this expectation and promise, like, if you help us, this is a way for you to be able to come to America,” said Smith, who is vice chair of No One Left Behind, a nonprofit based in Arlington, Virginia, that advocates for Afghan and Iraqi allies.

“That’s why I think it was so heartbreaking for so many veterans when we pulled out of Afghanistan,” she said, “because so many of us felt like we were complicit in breaking that promise.”

The treatment of Afghan allies could make people in other conflict zones “less willing to work with us,” she added.

Mohammad, who grew up in Kabul, signed up as a combat interpreter for the U.S. military in 2009. That year, he was seriously wounded in Helmand province when an improvised explosive device detonated, killing the U.S. Marine right in front of him.

After recovering, he was sent to Kabul to do noncombat translation work. But every day, he said, “the task of just going from your home to the office was just, you know, life and death.”

The risk was worth it, he said, “because of the value that we saw in the international community being in Afghanistan,” such as his sisters being able to go to school.

In 2014, he received what’s known as a “special immigrant visa” and moved to Texas. He enlisted in the U.S. Army almost immediately as a way to give back to the country that had changed his life.

After finishing his service in 2016, Mohammad — now a U.S. citizen — worked as a Defense Department contractor in Afghanistan, right up until the withdrawal.

“It just happened out of the blue, and it was super chaotic,” said Mohammad, who was in Kabul at the time. “I barely managed to get to the airport, get on the plane, and get out.”

With the Taliban now back in power, those with ties to the U.S. military and their relatives were targets. Mohammad’s family spent the next three years in hiding, his parents moving from place to place with four daughters and two sons.

“We couldn’t all be together in one place,” said his father, a history teacher also named Mohammad who also asked not to be fully identified for safety reasons. “The Taliban intelligence services were constantly after us.”

The family was evacuated to Qatar in 2024 after the younger Mohammad learned of a program to help Afghan relatives of U.S. service members. “That was a big sigh of relief for me,” he said.

When Trump returned to office, the family had been fully processed and was just waiting for their U.S. visas and plane tickets. “Now we don’t know our fate,” the older Mohammad said.

Several months ago, he said, people working at the camp started saying, “Why don’t you go back to Afghanistan? The country is calm and free now.” He said a State Department representative has since offered money for those willing to go back.

Returning would mean certain death, Mohammad and his family say. His sister Faezeh, 29, is trying to stay optimistic, and says she hopes that “in the near future Trump changes his mind.”

“Sometimes we think they’re going to send us back by force. It’s a very difficult worry,” she added. “Especially for those of us that have nothing to go back to.”

Left in limbo, Afghans who served with U.S. forces fear Trump could send them back to the Taliban
read more

Afghanistan, Pakistan Elders to Meet in Peshawar for Peace Talks

Khaama Press

Pakistani media say a joint Afghanistan-Pakistan meeting will be held in Peshawar to promote dialogue, a ceasefire and de-escalation between the two sides.

A joint peace assembly involving participants from Afghanistan and Pakistan is expected to be held on Tuesday, March 31, in Peshawar, according to Pakistani media reports, as efforts continue to calm worsening bilateral tensions.

According to the reports, the gathering will bring together political leaders, tribal elders, religious scholars, civil society activists, business figures and media representatives, with organizers describing the meeting as an urgent attempt to reopen channels of communication.

The main purpose of the gathering is to create space for dialogue, de-escalation and peacebuilding between Kabul and Islamabad, with participants expected to call on both sides to implement an immediate ceasefire and resolve disputes through diplomacy.

The planned meeting comes at a highly tense moment in bilateral relations, after renewed fighting and military operations along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border undermined hopes for a more durable truce following a brief Eid pause.

Meanwhile, Pakistani officials have said military operations against Afghanistan will continue unless the Taliban government stops what Islamabad describes as support for militant infrastructure used in attacks inside Pakistan. At a weekly briefing, foreign ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said the pause in fighting had ended and that operations would continue until Pakistan’s objectives were achieved.

According to Reuters, Pakistan says the Taliban administration must “review” what it called its misplaced priority of supporting terrorist infrastructure, while Islamabad continues to accuse Kabul of giving safe haven to militants such as the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). The Taliban has repeatedly denied those allegations and says militancy inside Pakistan is an internal issue.

Pakistani broadcaster Geo News reported that the meeting aims to establish a shared path toward peace and stability, with organizers arguing that such an initiative is urgently needed as mistrust and violence continue to deepen.

The broader crisis has drawn regional concern, with China recently urging Afghanistan and Pakistan to settle their differences through face-to-face talks, restraint and an immediate ceasefire rather than force.

At the same time, Pakistan is trying to manage several diplomatic crises at once, including its tensions with Afghanistan and its parallel role in regional diplomacy linked to the Iran war, where Islamabad has also sought to position itself as a mediator.

If the Peshawar meeting succeeds in opening even a limited channel for communication, it could offer a rare opportunity to lower tensions and prevent further deterioration in one of the region’s most fragile relationships.

Afghanistan, Pakistan Elders to Meet in Peshawar for Peace Talks
read more

UK approves resettlement for nearly 1,000 former Afghan special forces

Britain has approved resettlement for nearly 1,000 former Afghan special forces personnel after reviewing previously rejected immigration and protection cases.

Britain has agreed to resettle 884 former Afghan special forces personnel after reviewing previously rejected immigration cases, offering fresh hope to members of elite units who fought alongside British forces before the Taliban returned to power. The move follows a government reassessment of applications from the so-called “Triples” units, including CF 333 and ATF 444.

According to Forces News, the affected applicants were initially turned down under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP), but their files were reopened after the government found inconsistencies in earlier decision-making. Those who complete visa and security checks will be allowed to remain in Britain under the resettlement framework.

The British government said the review was launched after concerns that some decisions involving former Afghan partner forces had not been properly documented or consistently assessed. Defence procurement minister Luke Pollard described the delays as “deeply concerning” and said the government remained committed to supporting those who had served with British troops.

The former commandos are believed to have been trained by British special forces and took part in joint operations against the Taliban and other militant groups during the war in Afghanistan. Many have said they have faced severe threats since 2021 because of their links to British military operations.

Britain introduced ARAP in April 2021 to protect Afghans who worked for or alongside the UK government and were considered at serious risk because of that service. The route later became part of the broader Afghan Resettlement Programme, though ARAP itself was closed to new principal applications in July 2025.

The case has become one of the most controversial chapters in Britain’s Afghan resettlement effort, with campaigners and former military officials arguing that many of the “Triples” were unfairly excluded despite their direct operational role. Government documents published in February said roughly 30% of reviewed decisions in the first phase had been overturned.

Officials have also acknowledged that newly examined payment records and service verification evidence may prove some of these former fighters worked closely enough with British forces to qualify under ARAP rules. That finding helped trigger a second phase of review covering additional cases.

The decision to approve hundreds of former Afghan commandos is likely to ease some of the criticism surrounding Britain’s handling of these cases, though thousands of applications remain under scrutiny. For many of those still waiting, the review is not only about paperwork, but about survival.

UK approves resettlement for nearly 1,000 former Afghan special forces
read more

Pakistan says it will continue military operation against Militants in Afghanistan

Khaama Press

Pakistan said on Thursday it would continue its military operation against the Kabul administration after a temporary Eid ceasefire expired.

Pakistan said on Thursday it had resumed its “Ghazaab-ul-Haq” military operation against what it called militant hideouts in Afghanistan after a temporary Eid al-Fitr ceasefire expired, dimming hopes for a longer truce between the two neighbors. Foreign Ministry spokesman Tahir Andrabi said the pause had ended and operations had restarted in a “targeted” manner.

Islamabad says the operation, launched on the night of Feb. 25, is aimed at infrastructure and sanctuaries used by militants behind attacks inside Pakistan, particularly the Pakistani Taliban, or TTP. Pakistani officials have accused the Afghan Taliban of allowing militants to operate from Afghanistan soil, a charge Kabul has repeatedly denied.

The Taliban accused Pakistan during Eid of violating the ceasefire, while Pakistani officials said their forces were acting in response to cross-border attacks and what they called provocations from Afghanistan territory. The latest resumption of hostilities follows weeks of the worst fighting between the two sides in years.

The truce had been brokered with mediation from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar, all of which pushed for de-escalation after a sharp military escalation in late February and March. Pakistan has said the pause was also requested by the mediating states, though neither side has signaled a durable political breakthrough.

Religious scholars and clerics in the region have also urged both sides to halt the fighting at least until Eid al-Adha, warning that continued conflict would deepen civilian suffering and further destabilize the border region. But with mutual accusations and little trust between Islamabad and Kabul, those appeals have so far struggled to gain traction.

The current crisis marks a dramatic deterioration in ties between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban, once close allies. Pakistan has increasingly blamed Kabul for sheltering TTP fighters responsible for a wave of deadly attacks since 2022, while the Taliban says it does not allow Afghanistan territory to be used against any other country.

The violence has also raised humanitarian concerns after major Pakistani strikes in Afghanistan this month, including one in Kabul that Taliban officials said hit a rehabilitation center and caused mass casualties, a claim Islamabad rejected. International actors including the United Nations, European Union and regional states have repeatedly called for restraint and dialogue.

The renewed operation suggests the fragile Eid truce has failed to halt a broader slide toward sustained confrontation. Unless both sides can restore confidence through mediation or direct talks, the conflict risks becoming an entrenched and highly destabilizing front in the region.

Pakistan says it will continue military operation against Militants in Afghanistan
read more

Torkham Border Crossing Reopen Temporarily, Officials Say

Khaama Press

Local officials in Nangarhar have announced that the Torkham border crossing will reopen today exclusively for migrant travel.

Quraishi Badloon, head of Taliban Information and Culture in Nangarhar, wrote on his social media platform on Wednesday evening, March 25, that the crossing will open from 9 a.m. Thursday for the safe and orderly movement of migrants.

The decision aims to ensure secure and regulated transit for Afghans traveling between Afghanistan and Pakistan, according to Badloon.

The Torkham crossing had been closed for several days following clashes between Taliban fighters and Pakistani border guards, which disrupted all movement across the frontier.

Torkham is one of the most important border points between Afghanistan and Pakistan, serving as a critical route for both people and goods.

Recent weeks have seen escalating tensions between Pakistan and Taliban forces, with sporadic clashes reported along the border, raising concerns over regional stability.

Analysts say the temporary reopening for migrants may be an effort to ease humanitarian pressures while broader security and political tensions remain unresolved.

Historically, border closures like this have strained trade, disrupted families, and intensified local grievances, highlighting the fragile dynamics in Afghanistan-Pakistan relations.

The reopening signals a cautious step toward normalizing crossings, though the situation remains volatile, and authorities on both sides continue to monitor security developments closely.

Torkham Border Crossing Reopen Temporarily, Officials Say
read more