‘That video saved our lives’: how women are defying the Taliban’s brutal crackdown on protest

Zahra Nader and Sayed Abdali for Zan Times

It was nearly dark on 19 January 2022 when the knocking began. At first soft, then insistent, the sound echoed through the flat in the Afghan capital, Kabul. Zarmina Paryani and her sisters froze. They had known this day was coming.

“We always knew the risks of protesting and we were prepared to die on the streets,” the 26-year-old activist told the Guardian. “But I never imagined they would come for us like that – in the middle of the night, breaking into our home.”

Just three days earlier, she and dozens of women had protested on the streets and burned a burqa in a symbolic act of defiance against the Taliban’s growing restrictions. The protest had been organised via WhatsApp groups and word of mouth.

The image of the burning burqa, shared on social media, had gone viral and ignited uproar among Taliban soldiers and supporters, who were demanding the women be stoned to death for disrespecting the garment. Now, they were at her door.

As masked men began forcing their way inside, Paryani says she made a desperate decision. “I couldn’t bear to be taken alive. I couldn’t watch them enter our bedroom, violate us or behead us in the night.” She jumped from the three-storey window.

Zarmina Paryani stands in an open urban space on an overcast day
Zarmina Paryani now lives in exile in Germany with her sisters. Photograph: Sayed Abdali

Miraculously, she survived the fall with minor injuries. Just as fortunately, before the Taliban could break down their door, her sister Tamana Paryani recorded a short video in which she screamed that the Taliban were outside. She sent the footage to a journalist and it was immediately posted on social media, with their arrest initially denied by the militants.

“That video saved our lives. It was the only weapon we had.”

Zarmina grew up in Panjshir, in a deeply religious family. For years, before she moved to Kabul, her education consisted only of mosque schooling. “From a young age, we were taught that women were ‘deficient in mind’. I believed it. I adjusted myself to it.”

But school brought questions. Why were her high marks never enough to prove her worth compared with her brother? Why did neighbours mock her for attending school at all? Her mother, who had been denied an education, encouraged her daughters to keep going. “She used to say: learn so you will never need to depend on a man.”

Zarmina trained as a midwife, but when the Taliban returned to power in August 2021, the small gains that women and girls had made evaporated overnight. “It felt like a storm had come. Everything we had, even the little things, they took away.”

In the early weeks of the takeover, a spontaneous women’s protest movement emerged. Largely leaderless, composed of ordinary women – students, police officers, teachers, midwives – it began as scattered, small-scale marches. Zarmina and her sisters joined.

“We didn’t tell our father. He would never have let us go. Like many families, they didn’t support the protests because they feared for our safety.”

They covered their faces with masks, met in secret, and hid signs inside black plastic bags. Sometimes they changed locations at the last minute to evade Taliban patrols. Their demands were simple: the right to study, to work, to live without fear.

“We were not affiliated with any political party. We were just women asking for our rights,” says another protester, who was detained and beaten by Taliban officials after a protest near Kabul University in December 2022.

By January 2022 and the raid on Zarmina’s home, the sporadic arrests had turned into a targeted suppression. The video her sister sent to the journalist spread across international media and prompted global outrage. But inside Afghanistan, the result was clear: dissent would be met with brutal force.

The Taliban were arriving at the site of protests sometimes before the protest had started, says Zarmina, with women repressed into silence.

Today, no women come to the street to protest. The last known public protest took place in west Kabul in September last year. Indoor protests, symbolic acts, such as dancing alone in a mosque or burning the burqa, are now the only forms of resistance.

Since the Taliban’s return to power, women and girls have been barred from nearly every aspect of public life: schools, universities, most jobs and even parks.

Zarmina spent 27 days in detention before being released and told: “If you speak again, we will cut your throat.”

People sit at a long table on a platform as an audience looks on
A session of the hearings for the People’s Tribunal for Women of Afghanistan, held in Madrid in October. Photograph: Courtesy of Rawadari

She managed to escape to Pakistan disguised in a burqa and plastic shoes and now lives in exile in Germany. “I don’t feel secure even here. And when I write or speak, I wonder: will my father be harmed? Will my family be punished?”

Despite her fears, she testified at the People’s Tribunal for Women of Afghanistan during a hearing in Madrid in October, one of the few venues where Afghan women have spoken publicly about gender apartheid under Taliban rule. “It didn’t change what happened to me, but at least it’s a record for history.”

Rashida Manjoo, chair of the Tribunal, said: “The systematic exclusion of women and girls [by the Taliban authorities] from education, employment, healthcare, freedom of expression, public life and freedom of movement constitute gender persecution.”

Zarmina and other anti-Taliban protesters in exile say they continue to get messages from girls in Afghanistan who have been pushed into marriage, or forced to do sex work to be able to afford to feed their children.

“We used to think the Taliban were just a group of religious men. Now we see what their rule really means. Maybe next time, people won’t be fooled. Sometimes I think this generation, with all this suffering, might finally learn who the real enemy is.”

Zahra Nader is editor-in-chief and Sayed Abdali a reporter at Zan Times journalist

‘That video saved our lives’: how women are defying the Taliban’s brutal crackdown on protest
read more

UN Reports Northern Afghanistan Farmers Struggle to Replace Opium Income

Khaama Press
December 29, 2025

A United Nations report on Monday, December 29, revealed that farmers in northern Afghanistan are struggling to replace income lost from opium cultivation, highlighting urgent economic and livelihood challenges.

A new United Nations report reveals that opium farmers in northern Afghanistan are struggling to replace lost income following bans on poppy cultivation. Surveys conducted in Badakhshan, Balkh, and Kunduz provinces show 85 percent of households have been unable to offset revenue losses, leaving communities in urgent need of economic support.

The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) noted that while poppy cultivation in Badakhshan has increased in certain areas, nearly 95 percent of former poppy farmers reported halting cultivation due to legal restrictions. Wheat and other grains have become the dominant alternative crops, cited by more than 90 percent of respondents.

Background reports indicate Afghanistan produces over 80 percent of the world’s opium, fueling a global narcotics trade. International efforts to reduce cultivation have historically faced challenges due to persistent rural poverty and limited alternative livelihoods.

Additional studies highlight how repeated droughts, irregular rainfall, and water scarcity have further reduced agricultural productivity. Families face constrained options for sustainable recovery, forcing many to revert to opium cultivation despite official bans.

The UN report emphasizes the severe economic shock to farming communities and calls for targeted humanitarian and livelihood interventions to support sustainable alternatives.

Meanwhile, analysts stress that without focused aid programs, Afghanistan rural populations risk deepening poverty and food insecurity. Support must include access to water, credit, and market linkages for alternative crops.

UNODC warns that the failure to implement effective substitution programs could undermine Afghanistan’s broader security and development objectives, potentially reversing recent gains against narcotics production.

Repeated droughts, irregular rainfall, and water shortages have significantly reduced agricultural productivity, leaving families with limited options for sustainable recovery. Despite efforts, the Taliban have so far been unable to eliminate opium cultivation in Afghanistan.

UN Reports Northern Afghanistan Farmers Struggle to Replace Opium Income
read more

Afghanistan Ranked Among Six Most Insecure Countries Globally Amid Rising Poverty, Migration, and Humanitarian Crisis

Khaama Press

Afghanistan is ranked among the world’s most insecure countries, with political instability, economic hardship, humanitarian crises, and restricted opportunities for women driving widespread migration and insecurity.

An international research institute has named Afghanistan as one of the six most insecure countries in the world. Following Afghanistan, Yemen, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Russia, and war-torn Ukraine were also identified among the least secure nations globally.

The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) noted that although armed conflicts have decreased since the Taliban returned to power, poor governance, humanitarian crises, and political instability continue to fuel insecurity. Security in Afghanistan, the report emphasizes, is not limited to armed clashes.

Data released on Saturday, December 27, show Afghanistan as the least secure country in South Asia. Factors such as widespread access to weapons by unaccountable groups, rising violent crime, political instability, and large-scale internal and external migration place the country at the bottom of global peace rankings.

According to the IEP, Afghanistan under Taliban rule ranks 158 out of 163 countries worldwide in terms of human security and peace. The report also notes that Afghanistan and Ukraine bear the highest economic costs of violence, exceeding 40 percent of their GDP.

The Global Peace Index, published annually by the Institute for Economics and Peace, identifies Iceland, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, and Switzerland as the world’s most peaceful countries, highlighting the importance of political stability, economic security, and social cohesion.

The report defines insecurity beyond armed conflicts, assessing social safety, internal and external tensions, and the degree of state militarization. True peace, according to the IEP, requires social, political, and economic stability, not just the absence of fighting.

Access to essential services is also a key indicator of social peace. Afghanistan’s health system is under severe strain due to declining foreign aid, with the World Health Organization reporting that 80 percent of its services were reduced this year because of budget shortfalls.

Afghanistan is also among the top four countries generating international refugees. By mid-2024, more than half of all registered refugees at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees came from Afghanistan, Syria, Ukraine, and Venezuela.

Despite the end of active conflict between the Taliban and Afghanistan’s former government, lack of economic opportunities, fear of Taliban enforcement, and restrictions on women’s education and employment have pushed many citizens to migrate abroad. These conditions undermine social and economic security for families.

Ongoing tensions between the Taliban and neighbouring countries such as Iran and Pakistan have led to mass expulsions of Afghan migrants. International organizations warn that Afghanistan’s current infrastructure and public services cannot accommodate the returning populations, increasing humanitarian and environmental pressures.

Afghanistan Ranked Among Six Most Insecure Countries Globally Amid Rising Poverty, Migration, and Humanitarian Crisis
read more

UNICEF Warns Funding Cuts Could Push Six Million Children Out of School by 2026

UNICEF warned that continued cuts to global education funding could deny schooling and essential services to six million children worldwide by 2026.

The UN children’s agency UNICEF has warned that continued cuts to global education funding could force up to six million children out of school by the end of 2026.

In a statement posted on X on Sunday, December 28, UNICEF said children in crisis-hit regions, including Somalia and Palestine, face losing access to schooling and essential services provided through schools.

UNICEF stressed that education for every child is “life-saving and life-changing,” urging donors and governments to shield learning systems from the impacts of conflict and humanitarian crises.

According to the agency, schools in fragile settings often serve as more than learning spaces, providing food, psychosocial support, and a sense of safety for vulnerable children.

Prolonged conflicts, displacement, climate shocks, and economic pressures have already disrupted education for millions worldwide, with funding gaps widening as humanitarian needs increase.

UNICEF warned that shrinking budgets threaten not only education but also children’s access to nutrition, mental health care, and protection services linked to schools.

The agency said the loss of these services could deepen long-term inequalities, increasing risks of child labour, early marriage, and exploitation.

Meanwhile, UNICEF called on international donors to urgently reverse funding cuts and prioritize education as a core humanitarian response.

It added that sustained investment in children’s education is critical to preventing a “lost generation” and ensuring stability and recovery in crisis-affected societies.

UNICEF Warns Funding Cuts Could Push Six Million Children Out of School by 2026
read more

Millions of Afghans face hunger as aid cuts deepen a humanitarian crisis

By ABDUL KAHAR AFGHAN

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — For 10 hours a day, Rahimullah sells socks from his cart in eastern Kabul, earning about $4.5 to $6 per day. It’s a pittance, but it’s all he has to feed his family of five.

Rahimullah, who like many Afghans goes by only one name, is one of millions of Afghans who rely on humanitarian aid, both from the Afghan authorities and from international charity organizations, for survival. An estimated 22.9 million people — nearly half the population — required aid in 2025, the International Committee for the Red Cross said in an article on its website Monday.

But severe cuts in international aid — including the halting of U.S. aid to programs such as food distribution run by the United Nations’ World Food Program — have severed this lifeline.

More than 17 million people in Afghanistan now face crisis levels of hunger in the winter, the World Food Program warned last week, 3 million more than were at risk more than a year ago.

The slashing in aid has come as Afghanistan is battered by a struggling economy, recurrent droughts, two deadly earthquakes and the mass influx of Afghan refugees expelled from countries such as Iran and Pakistan. The resulting multiple shocks have severely pressured resources, including of housing and food.

UN appeals for help

Tom Fletcher, the U.N. humanitarian chief, told the Security Council in mid-December that the situation was compounded by “overlapping shocks,” including the recent earthquakes and increasing restrictions on humanitarian aid access and staff.

While Fletcher said nearly 22 million Afghans will need U.N. assistance in 2026, his organization will focus on 3.9 million facing the most urgent need of lifesaving help due to reduced donor contributions.

Fletcher said this winter was “the first in years with almost no international food distribution.”

“As a result, only about 1 million of the most vulnerable people have received food assistance during the lean season in 2025,” compared to 5.6 million last year, he said.

The year has been devastating for U.N. humanitarian organizations, which have had to cut thousands of jobs and spending in the wake of aid cuts.

“We are grateful to all of you who have continued to support Afghanistan. But as we look towards 2026, we risk a further contraction of life-saving help — at a time when food insecurity, health needs, strain on basic services, and protection risks are all rising,” Fletcher said.

Returning refugees

The return of millions of refugees has added pressure on an already teetering system. Minister of Refugees and Repatriation Affairs Abdul Kabir said Sunday that 7.1 million Afghan refugees had returned to the country over the last four years, according to a statement on the ministry website.

Rahimullah, 29, was one of them. The former Afghan Army soldier fled to neighboring Pakistan after the Taliban seized power in 2021. He was deported back to Afghanistan two years later, and initially received aid in the form of cash as well as food.

“The assistance was helping me a lot,” he said. But without it, “now I don’t have enough money to live on. God forbid, if I were to face a serious illness or any other problem, it would be very difficult for me to handle because I don’t have any extra money for expenses.”

The massive influx of former refugees has also sent rents skyrocketing. Rahimullah’s landlord has nearly doubled the rent of his tiny two-room home, with walls made half of concrete and half of mud and a homemade mud stove for cooking. Instead of 4,500 afghanis (about $67), he now wants 8,000 afghanis (about $120) – a sum Rahimullah cannot afford. So he, his wife, daughter and two young sons will have to move next month. They don’t know where to.

Before the Taliban takeover, Rahimullah had a decent salary and his wife worked as a teacher. But the new government’s draconian restrictions on women and girls mean women are barred from nearly all jobs, and his wife is unemployed.

“Now the situation is such that even if we find money for flour, we don’t have it for oil, and even if we find it for oil, we can’t pay the rent. And then there is the extra electricity bill,” Rahimullah said.

Harsh winters compound the misery

In Afghanistan’s northern province of Badakhshan, Sherin Gul is desperate. In 2023, her family of 12 got supplies of flour, oil, rice, beans, pulses, salt and biscuits. It was a lifesaver.

But it only lasted six months. Now, there is nothing. Her husband is old and weak and cannot work, she said. With 10 children, seven girls and three boys between the ages of 7 and 27, the burden of providing for the family has fallen on her 23-year-old son – the only one old enough to work. But even he only finds occasional jobs.

“There are 12 of us … and one person working cannot cover the expenses,” she said. “We are in great trouble.”

Sometimes neighbors take pity on them and give them food. Often, they all go hungry.

“There have been times when we have nothing to eat at night, and my little children have fallen asleep without food,” Gul said. “I have only given them green tea and they have fallen asleep crying.”

Before the Taliban takeover, Gul worked as a cleaner, earning just about enough to feed her family. But the ban on women working has left her unemployed, and she said she developed a nervous disorder and is often sick.

Compounding their misery is the harsh cold of the northern Afghan winter, when snow halts construction work where her son can sometimes find jobs. And there is the added expense of firewood and charcoal.

“If this situation continues like this, we may face severe hunger,” Gul said. “And then it will be very difficult for us to survive in this cold weather.”

Associated Press writers Farnoush Amiri at the United Nations, Jamey Keaten in Geneva and Elena Becatoros in Athens contributed to this report.

Millions of Afghans face hunger as aid cuts deepen a humanitarian crisis
read more

Republicans Who Backed Afghan Visas Are Mum as Trump Halts Them

Back in 2021, as Kabul fell to the Taliban following the chaotic U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, Republicans in Congress were among the loudest voices in Washington arguing that the United States had to throw open its doors to those Afghans who had assisted Americans during roughly two decades of war.

At the time and in the years since, G.O.P. lawmakers have pressed for the expansion of a special visa program for Afghan allies, insisting in letters to the administration, in hearings and in news conferences staged outside the Capitol, that it be expanded.

Then Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan man who enlisted in a paramilitary force that worked with Americans and who was evacuated by the U.S. military in 2021, was charged with shooting two National Guard members in downtown Washington just before Thanksgiving, killing one and severely wounding the other.

President Trump declared that the United States “must now re-examine every single alien who has entered our country from Afghanistan” during the Biden administration. And even though Mr. Lakanwal was not admitted under a Special Immigrant Visa, the administration halted that program, closing the last legal pathway for Afghans to enter the country.

Republicans who were some of the leading advocates for the United States to provide refuge for Afghans have now gone quiet, apparently resigned to the demise of the Special Immigrant Visa program.

“Politically, I wouldn’t say it’s dead on arrival, but it’s severely damaged now,” Representative Michael McCaul, Republican of Texas, said of the push to issue more visas. “It’s just hugely unfortunate, because they fought alongside our military. They are veterans.”

Yet there has been no move by the Republican-led Congress to scrutinize the administration’s decision to suspend the visas, or to attempt to force the administration to resume issuing them.

Since 2021, the United States has allowed more than 190,000 Afghans to settle in the country, some on green cards as Special Immigrant Visa recipients, and others who were permitted to enter the country temporarily while they applied for permanent residency or asylum.

A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers had been pressing for an additional 20,000 visas to be issued, writing in a letter to senior appropriators in May that the program included “rigorous vetting” and was critical to providing “a lifesaving path to safety for Afghan nationals who face deadly retribution as a result of their work alongside U.S. troops, diplomats, and contractors.”

But the shooting shattered the bipartisan consensus.

“What happened changed things,” said Representative Lloyd K. Smucker, a Pennsylvania Republican who was among those calling for more visas in the spring. “I’ll defer to the president on what he thinks is the right thing to do.”

“After this,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, referring to the shooting, “we’re going to have to look at everything.”

Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the Republican chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, said it was “evident” that more vetting was needed, but that “there were an awful lot of Afghans who were invaluable in assisting our troops and helping to keep them safe.”

Some Democrats were far more blunt. Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, a Democrat who flew to Kabul in 2021 on an unauthorized trip to witness the evacuation of Americans and Afghans, said his Republican colleagues no longer appeared interested in collaborating on a solution for the visa program.

Republicans widely condemned the Biden-era parole program that allowed tens of thousands of Afghans to stay in the country for two years while they applied for legal permanent residency. Mr. Lakanwal entered the country under that temporary legal status and was granted asylum in April.

Some immigration hard-liners in Congress have called for beefing up the vetting of such immigrants, including by rescreening and possibly deporting some Afghans.

But Republicans have argued that vetting for the special visa program — which required applicants to undergo background checks, biometric screenings and interviews, and to submit a written recommendation from a top military or diplomatic official — is meticulous.

“We’ve had veterans in the past who have created horrific acts of violence, like Tim McVeigh, Lee Harvey Oswald,” said Mr. McCaul, who was the top Republican on the Foreign Affairs Committee during the Afghanistan withdrawal. “But we don’t condemn the whole community. What it’s doing is it’s basically saying that all Afghans are terrorists. And they’re not.”
Senator Markwayne Mullin, Republican of Oklahoma, who attempted to enter Afghanistan amid the evacuation, said the Biden administration had “dumped” Afghans with Special Immigrant Visas into the country with insufficient federal programs to assist them.

“We need to put a pause on until we get ahold of the people that came here through the S.I.V. program, and we have touched base with them, know where they’re at and make sure they’re all in a good space,” Mr. Mullin said.

Representative Jason Crow, Democrat of Colorado, who worked closely with Republicans in 2021 to push for a robust resettlement program for Afghan partners, said Republicans were too afraid of political backlash to challenge Mr. Trump’s pause on the visa program.

“There are Americans alive today who would not have come home had it not been for Afghans who stood and protected them,” Mr. Crow said. He said Republicans had lost sight of the role of Congress to “be a check on the presidency, regardless of whether the president in office is your party or not.”

Republicans Who Backed Afghan Visas Are Mum as Trump Halts Them
read more

‘International community has lost interest’: Afghanistan’s first female vice-president sees history repeating

The peace of the graveyard has descended upon Afghanistan.

“Afghanistan might seem safe now, there are not a lot of explosions, but it is a graveyard kind of security. The most peaceful place is the grave: there nobody protests,” says Dr Sima Samar.

Samar has spent a lifetime working for the ideals of a country that no longer exists.

The Hazara human rights advocate and medical doctor served as vice-president of Afghanistan, and as its minister for women, shortly after the US-led invasion began. For nearly 20 years, she led the country’s Independent Human Rights Commission (IHRC).

Now in exile, she tells the Guardian she fears her country is being forgotten while the oppressive rule of the Taliban is normalised and solidified.

Conflicts around the world jostle for global attention: the genocide in Darfur; bombardment and starvation in Gaza; ceaseless, grinding conflict in Ukraine; terrorism in Bondi.

“The international community has lost interest, has stopped paying attention,” Samar says. “There are conflicts all around the world, some very bad conflicts, but Afghanistan is also important … there is a moral responsibility to defend human rights everywhere.

“What is security when a woman is not safe to walk in the street? What is security if a girl cannot go to school? What is security if families have food for lunch but no food for dinner. There’s no human security.”

A long memory for conflict

Afghanistan has a long memory – especially for conflict. Where the world might see the tumult of unprecedented events, Afghans see history repeating.

Samar says the world’s current neglect of Afghanistan is akin to the indifference after the collapse of the Soviet-backed government in 1992. The country fell into brutal civil war, ended only by the first rise to power of the Taliban, providing a safe harbour from where Osama bin Laden plotted the 9/11 attacks.

“We have seen the consequences of forgetting, of isolating Afghanistan in the past,” she says. “We know what happens, not only for Afghanistan, but for the world.”

Visiting Australia, Samar spoke at Canberra’s Parliament House on 14 December, reflecting on taking carriage of a shell of a country in the aftermath of the ouster of the Taliban in 2001. She says a small band of democrats paled before the immensity of the task before them.

“We had to start from scratch: draft a new constitution, create ministries and rebuild institutions. I remember walking through Kabul’s shattered streets thinking that, if we could keep girls in school and women in the workplace, Afghanistan would never again fall to darkness.

“Over the next 20 years, we tried.”

There were wins. Samar’s foundation, the Shuhada Organisation, opened schools and hospitals in remote places that had never known either. The foundation trained midwives (Afghanistan has one of the highest infant and maternal mortality rates in the world), teachers and administrators to run rural provinces.

As chair of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, Samar spent nearly two decades documenting violations and beseeching those in authority not to look away, as she puts it: “urging … the world to remember that justice must never be sacrificed for convenience”.

“There were moments of genuine progress,” Samar said in her speech. “Millions of girls returned to school. Women sat in parliament, ran ministries, and held prominent positions in civil society.”

The gains were fragile always, and regression common, but, in individual lives, there was real change.

And then, it was gone.

Samar tells the Guardian it was devastating to see the collapse of an idea of a country to which so many had given so much.

“We sacrificed a lot, all of us, but at the end we gave the country back to the same group which was removed in 2001.”

For all its idealism and the billions in international support, that government was always brittle, riven by corruption and mismanagement, undermined by continued insurgent violence. Progress was always piecemeal, often compromised.

In August 2021, in the face of US withdrawal (a deal negotiated between a first-term Donald Trump and the Taliban – without the elected government of Afghanistan in the room), the country changed with terrifying swiftness – Kabul fell in a single morning.

The Taliban, which retook control, promised a reformed administration. In an attempt to court international legitimacy and recognition, it vowed there would be no discrimination against women, no persecution of religious or ethnic minorities, no retribution against those who had served the former government, or international forces. But always with the caveat of “within the frameworks that we have”.

The reality has been, instead, a more sophisticated oppression, but conscious of presenting a more benign face in pursuit of international credibility.

“Two decades later, we are again speaking of Afghanistan in the language of absence and erasure,” Samar told her Parliament House audience. “Erasure of women from the public; absence of protection for persecuted groups; and absence of justice.

“Today, girls in Afghanistan are banned from secondary school. Universities are closed to women. Women cannot work for NGOs, visit parks, or travel without a male guardian. Women cannot even be heard in public. The word ‘apartheid’ is not an exaggeration; it is the lived reality for women and girls in Afghanistan.”

Taliban arguments about modesty and protection, about governing “in accordance with our values” are self-serving falsehoods, Samar says, born of a narrow, suffocating vision of a country that has always known a breathtaking diversity of ethnicity, language and culture.

Samar says tragedy lies, too, in international obeisance.

“This is not about culture or religion; it is about power and control,” she says.

“And it thrives in silence, including the silence of the international community, the fatigue of donors, and the complacency of governments who speak of human rights in press releases or places like Geneva and New York but whisper them away in negotiations.”

Small acts of defiance

Samar praises Australia for its acceptance, over decades, of Afghan refugees, particularly from the persecuted Hazara minority. She says the country can take more. And she says Australia’s efforts under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) are vital in attempting to hold the Taliban accountable for its abuses.

Samar urges Australia’s to maintain diplomatic recognition of the Afghanistan embassy in Canberra, which was credentialled by the former government, rather than handing diplomatic recognition to representatives of the Taliban. The foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, has warned the current ambassador (serving in exile) will not have his credential renewed in February.

Dozens of countries, including Germany and Norway, have credentialled Taliban diplomats, even without formally recognising its government. But retaining recognition of the former government’s envoys would carry a powerful message, Samar argues, not just for the Taliban, but the broader international community.

In Afghanistan, Samar sees slivers of hope still. Small acts of defiance take on a disproportionate significance.

“A teacher who continues to teach five or 10 girls in secret is a resistance against ignorance, a woman who comes out into the street, whose voice is heard, is a resistance against erasure,” she says.

Homes destroyed, dreams survive

Samar has already rebuilt a country once. She knows a future rebuilding of Afghanistan will be the work of younger generations, but she hopes to glimpse the beginnings of that brighter, peaceful future.

Exiled since the fall of Kabul on that chaotic, fearful morning in August 2021, she would like, one day, to return.

Like the country she worked for decades to build, the house where she was born in Ghazni, has been destroyed.

“But I really do dream of it still. It is strange, because it is not there any more, but I dream of it,” she says.

Still standing is Samar’s house in the capital, Kabul, a place she knows she may never see again. But to those who ask, she answers her home is in Afghanistan.

“I am still very much an Afghan. I would love to return one day. I keep saying that I would like to die in my country.”

‘International community has lost interest’: Afghanistan’s first female vice-president sees history repeating
read more

Bloomberg: Afghans in U.S. Summoned to Present Documents During Holidays

According to the report, this move has drawn sharp criticism from immigrant rights organizations.

Bloomberg reported that the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has summoned Afghan migrants residing in the United States to present their documents during the official Christmas and New Year holidays.

According to the report, this move has drawn sharp criticism from immigrant rights organizations, who view it as a sign of intensifying immigration policies under President Donald Trump’s administration, particularly targeting Afghan migrants.

Mohammad Jamal Muslim, an immigrant rights activist, stated: “Supporting immigrants’ rights and defending civil rights reflects the strength of a government. If such arbitrary actions are not curbed, internal division between lawmakers and the government could grow, and democratic values and civil rights in the West will lose their meaning.”

Following the shooting by Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who allegedly opened fire on two members of the U.S. National Guard near the White House, American media have reported that with his case being transferred from the Supreme Court to a district court and the introduction of new federal charges, the likelihood of a death sentence has increased.

Ruhollah Sakhizad, a legal expert, said: “Preliminary courts have jurisdiction over early stages of criminal cases. Considering the proportionality of crime and punishment, as well as the clarity of motive and cause, it will be determined whether the suspect will be sentenced to death.”

Earlier, Reuters reported that Rahmanullah Lakanwal’s initial court hearing was held online on December 2. Although he remained hospitalized, Lakanwal denied all charges and pleaded not guilty.

Bloomberg: Afghans in U.S. Summoned to Present Documents During Holidays
read more

Afghanistan embassy in Japan to suspend operations from January 2026

Khaama Press

 

Afghanistan’s embassy in Japan said it will suspend all operations from January 31, 2026, following consultations with Japanese authorities amid ongoing diplomatic uncertainty.

The Afghanistan embassy in Japan has announced it will suspend operations after the end of January next year, marking another diplomatic closure following political changes in Afghanistan.

In a statement issued on Friday, December 26, the embassy said the decision was made after consultations with Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The embassy said that from January 31, 2026, all political, economic, cultural, and consular activities will be halted until further notice.

The Afghanistan mission in Tokyo is currently run by diplomats appointed by Afghanistan’s former government and has not been taken over by representatives of the Taliban.

The embassy is headed by Ambassador Shaida Mohammad Abdali, according to the statement.

Several Afghanistan diplomatic missions abroad have already suspended operations in recent years amid pressure from the Taliban on host countries and ongoing uncertainty over diplomatic recognition.

Japan has not formally recognised the Taliban administration but has maintained limited engagement, primarily through humanitarian assistance and regional diplomacy.

The suspension is expected to affect Afghan nationals living in Japan, particularly those requiring consular services such as passport renewals and legal documentation.

The move highlights the continued diplomatic isolation of Afghanistan and the growing challenges faced by Afghanistan missions abroad more than four years after the Taliban returned to power.

Afghanistan embassy in Japan to suspend operations from January 2026
read more

Severe Drinking Water Shortage in Kabul’s District 7 Raises Public Alarm

December 24, 2025

Some of them say they have been struggling with a water crisis for months, a problem that has severely affected their daily lives.

In District 7 of Kabul city, the shortage of drinking water has become one of the most serious daily challenges for residents.

Some of them say they have been struggling with a water crisis for months, a problem that has severely affected their daily lives.

Mohammad Hassan, a Kabul resident, said: “People’s children are very young, and no one has the means to buy drinking water, firewood, or coal during this winter. Everyone is facing a water shortage. This problem isn’t limited to Kabul; it affects all people of Afghanistan.”

Several other residents, who are forced to walk long distances to fetch drinking water, shared their demands from the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

Mohammad Akbar, another Kabul resident, told TOLOnews: “We brought our barrels from Qala-e-Muslim in Doghabad to fetch water. In some places where solar-powered pumps were installed for wells, they don’t work and there is no water. People are facing many difficulties.”

Payenda Mohammad, another Kabul resident, said: “The government should come and assess these areas, drill deep wells, as the land is dry and there is no water.”

While water is considered one of the most basic human needs, the ongoing shortage in the heart of the capital is a serious warning sign for the health and well-being of thousands of families.

Previously, the Kabul Urban Water Supply Authority had announced several projects aimed at addressing the city’s water shortage.

Severe Drinking Water Shortage in Kabul’s District 7 Raises Public Alarm
read more