3 Years After a Toddler’s Parents Fled Kabul, a Reunion Is Still on Hold

The twisting saga that separated the Hashemis in Oregon from their infant son has reached a new dead end: President Trump’s hold on all visas to the United States.

Husna Hashemi keeps photos on her phone from the day more than three years ago when she handed her infant son, asleep and swaddled in blankets, to her husband’s parents and brother in a city park in Kabul.

She didn’t want to leave — even now, speaking in Dari through an interpreter, she wept as she talked about returning to Afghanistan to be with her youngest child. But her husband, Sayed Rasool Hashemi, had worked for years with the American military, and after the U.S. government fled Afghanistan, the Hashemis faced a terrible choice: Stay and risk everyone’s lives or leave their newborn behind.

“I did not want to go without him,” Ms. Hashemi said. “What kind of mother does that?”

The Hashemis’ story, told from their neat, snug suburban apartment in Beaverton, Ore., where the immigrants are building new lives, holds twists and bureaucratic dead ends that span two presidential administrations and would make Franz Kafka proud. It’s capped, for now, by President Trump’s near-total blockade on Afghan immigration. In its infuriating absurdity is a metaphor of sorts for the long war’s chaotic end.

On a recent evening, the laughter of the Hashemis’ two older children broke the quiet every now and then, but their youngest child’s voice remains missing from their attempt at the American dream.

“It’s just so stupid,” said Brian Torres, a family friend. “So stupid and cruel.”

Sayed Anas Hashemi was just a month old, with no visa or passport, when his parents were forced to leave him behind. Efforts to bring him to the United States have lurched onward, but an attack on two U.S. National Guard soldiers near the White House in November, and the charging of an Afghan immigrant who had also worked for the United States, has left any reunion on hold.

“Every time we get so close, then something happens,” Mr. Hashemi said. “Now, we just don’t know.”

Mr. Hashemi was in his late teens when he began working for the U.S. government in 2004, first doing odd jobs for the military, then serving as an interpreter for American contractors. He considered it the right thing to do — he remembered life as a child under the Taliban as violent and frightening — and an economic opportunity, particularly after he married and started a family.

“They said they will take care of us,” he said of his employers. “I heard that many times.”

When President Joseph R. Biden Jr. set the final timeline for the American withdrawal from Afghanistan, culminating in the frenzied departure from Kabul in August 2021, Mr. Hashemi took his family into hiding.

“Everybody was scared,” Mr. Hashemi said.

The risks to Afghan citizens seen as cooperating with the United States were apparent enough that the United States established an office within the State Department — the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts, or CARE — and offered a special immigrant visa for Afghans deemed likely to face Taliban reprisal. The system, crafted by the Biden administration, was overwhelmed from the start.

Mr. Hashemi began the visa application process even before the Americans left and waited more than a year for the paperwork allowing him to leave for Qatar, the first stop for many Afghans fleeing to America. During that interlude, Ms. Hashemi became pregnant with their third child, and Sayed Anas was born in September 2022.

The family’s paperwork came through one month later. The infant did not have a passport and hadn’t been included on the family’s visa applications because he hadn’t been born. They spent almost four months in Qatar, but Sayed Anas still didn’t have the proper documents when the rest of the family received permission to fly to the United States in February 2023.

They thought their son would be allowed out in months, not years.

Their friend Mr. Torres, a former middle school teacher, started volunteering with a refugee resettlement group after listening to a ride-share driver in Washington, D.C., recount his story about leaving Afghanistan so his children could get an education. The Hashemis were Mr. Torres’s first assignment. He thought the work meant helping with the basics of building a life in a new country, in the suburbs of Portland, Ore., such as how to schedule doctor’s appointments or buy car insurance.

But every conversation with the Hashemis came back to the same reality, that their life in the United States couldn’t truly begin until they had their son.

Even before that, the family’s lawyer, Gabe Espinal, suggested they work directly with a U.S. embassy in Central Asia or the Middle East. But different countries, even different U.S. embassies, have their own policies about when and how they process visa applications or whether they’ll even work with Afghan nationals. Many that do remain are plagued by backlogs.

The Hashemis secured a visa interview appointment for Sayed Anas at the U.S. Embassy in Qatar but with four days’ notice, nowhere near enough time to get him there. Officials at the U.S. Embassy in Tajikistan told them to fill out an online visa form for Sayed Anas. For months, they could not get the link to work.

“I don’t want to call this a comedy of errors because none of it is funny,” Mr. Torres said. “But at every step, something seemed to go wrong.”

This past fall, a reunion felt close. The embassy in Tajikistan told Mr. Hashemi and his lawyer that if they could get Sayed Anas to Dushanbe, the country’s capital, the embassy would process his case.

Then came the National Guard attack.

President Trump declared that “every single alien who has entered our country from Afghanistan” during the Biden administration must be re-examined. The State Department has frozen visas for Afghans, though the U.S. government website about the presidential proclamation barring Afghan nationals notes that limited exceptions may be made for people younger than 8 with special immigrant visas.

The White House referred questions to the Department of Homeland Security. A spokeswoman for the department did not respond to requests for comment.

Mr. Espinal thinks the evolving federal policy could allow Sayed Anas into the United States, but he’s not certain and has struggled to find someone who can answer his questions. The family also doesn’t know whether Mr. Hashemi, who hopes to fly to Asia to take his son through the final steps in the process and bring him to the United States, would be allowed back in if he made the trip. The State Department and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.

“This family could be reunited in three months,” Mr. Torres said. “Or it could be another three years.”

Meantime, their older children, now 11 and 8, are thriving in school. Mr. Hashemi, who said he was not angry at the U.S. government, has a job with a company that makes gun sights and has created a small support group for other Afghan refugees in Oregon. Ms. Hashemi is taking English classes with other Afghan women but struggles to focus on anything but her missing child.

“She is sick all the time,” Mr. Hashemi said. “She cannot stop crying.”

They’ve watched Sayed Anas grow from a baby to a boy through a screen. The child, now 3, knows who his parents are thanks to regular WhatsApp calls and that they’re trying to bring him to the United States. Like them, he just doesn’t know when that will happen.

“All the time when we call, he says, ‘I want to come there, I want to see your house,’” Mr. Hashemi said. “My brother tells him that I will come get him on a plane. So sometimes he tells me, ‘I see your plane today.’ He sees planes, and he thinks we are coming to take him.”

Anna Griffin the Pacific Northwest bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of Washington, Idaho, Alaska, Montana and Oregon.

3 Years After a Toddler’s Parents Fled Kabul, a Reunion Is Still on Hold
read more

Over 10,000 Afghanistan and Pakistan Traders’ Shipments Stalled at Karachi Port

Khaama Press

More than 10,000 Afghanistan and Pakistan traders face mounting losses as transit shipments and containers remain stuck at Karachi port due to border closures.

The Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry has warned that over 10,000 Afghan and Pakistani traders are facing severe losses as their transit shipments remain stuck at Karachi port.

Express Tribune reported on Tuesday that closures at key border crossings, including Torkham, Spin Boldak, Chaman, and Ghulam Khan, have caused massive disruptions to trade between the two countries.

Officials said 11,000 to 12,000 transit containers destined for Afghanistan and Central Asian republics are stranded at Karachi port due to the ongoing border shutdowns.

In addition, thousands of trucks carrying imports and exports from traders on both sides are parked at the borders, with perishable goods rotting and financial losses mounting.

The United Nations noted in a report that the continued closure of crossings between Pakistan and Taliban-controlled Afghanistan is costing traders on both sides approximately $1 million daily.

Afghanistan relies heavily on Pakistan’s ports and transit routes for trade, making border closures a major blow to its import-export economy.

Similar disruptions have occurred in the past during political tensions or security incidents, highlighting the fragile nature of trade logistics in the region.

Traders are urging both parties to reopen crossings promptly to prevent further economic damage and avoid a humanitarian impact on communities dependent on trade.

Experts warn that prolonged border closures could disrupt supply chains across South and Central Asia, increase costs for businesses, and deepen regional economic instability.

Over 10,000 Afghanistan and Pakistan Traders’ Shipments Stalled at Karachi Port
read more

UN Requests $1.71 Billion for Afghanistan Humanitarian Aid in 2026

 

The United Nations has requested $1.71 billion for 2026 to support humanitarian programs in Afghanistan, citing widespread poverty, unemployment, and urgent relief needs.

The United Nations has requested $1.71 billion in funding for humanitarian programs in Afghanistan for 2026, warning that the country remains one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises despite a slight reduction in overall needs.

According to the UN Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, approximately 21.9 million people, nearly 45 percent of the population, will require humanitarian assistance next year. Ongoing conflict, economic fragility, food insecurity, and climate-related shocks are cited as the main drivers of need.

The UN report highlights that years of underinvestment in basic services, combined with recurring natural disasters, widespread drought, and the return of millions of migrants from neighboring countries, have severely weakened the resilience of Afghanistan families.

Aid organizations also noted the impact of restrictions on women and girls, stating that denial of education, employment, and participation in public life reduces household income, increases dependence on humanitarian aid, and limits relief operations.

Afghanistan faces staggering socioeconomic challenges, with UN data indicating nearly 75 percent unemployment and 90 percent of the population living below the poverty line, intensifying vulnerability to crises.

The return of millions of Afghan migrants from Iran and Pakistan in recent years has put immense pressure on local economies, public services, and humanitarian infrastructure, straining an already fragile system.

The UN has warned that continued funding shortages could force aid agencies to scale back life-saving programs, particularly for women, children, and internally displaced persons, at a time when needs remain acute nationwide.

Experts stress that sustained international support, alongside targeted economic and social programs, is critical to mitigating the ongoing humanitarian disaster and preventing further deterioration in the livelihoods of millions of people of Afghanistan.

UN Requests $1.71 Billion for Afghanistan Humanitarian Aid in 2026
read more

Pakistan-Afghanistan Fued Freezes $3 Billion in Annual Bilateral Trade

  • The border closure, triggered by cross-border clashes and accusations of sheltering the TTP rebel group, has trapped approximately 8,000 truckers and halted bilateral trade, which previously amounted to $2 billion to $3 billion annually.
  • The trade halt is inflicting severe economic damage, causing irreparable losses to traders, impacting Pakistan’s citrus exports, and silencing Peshawar’s once-bustling gemstone market.
  • Experts believe that while the Taliban is seeking new trade routes with Iran and Central Asia, the long-term economic opportunities for Afghanistan—such as the TAPI pipeline and regional transport links—will ultimately still require stable relations and doing business with Pakistan.

Kabul

For nearly two months, Sayed Wali, a young Afghan truck driver, has watched the sun rise, and the sun set in the fabled Khyber Pass, which connects western Pakistan to eastern Afghanistan. But he’s not here for the view. He’s stuck.

Wali can’t even leave his 10-wheel truck and its cargo unattended for fear it could be robbed or ransacked.

He was taking a shipment of Afghan imports from Pakistan’s southern seaport city of Karachi through some 1,800 kilometers of roads that wind from the Arabian Sea up through to the treacherous Khyber mountains and onward to Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul.

Then politics got in the way.

Simmering tensions between the Taliban-led Afghan government and Islamabad boiled over into fierce border clashes in early October after Pakistan carried out air strikes inside Afghanistan.

Islamabad accused Kabul of sheltering the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) rebel group, whose attacks killed scores of Pakistani troops in September.

In a repeat of its key lever to pressure landlocked Kabul, Islamabad sealed half a dozen major and minor border crossings with Afghanistan on October 12. But instead of negotiating for reopening the vital trade routes, the Taliban retaliated by shutting the border with Pakistan in early October.

Wali is not alone; some 8,000 truckers are stuck at the two major border crossings along the 2,640 kilometers of the Durand Line, which separates the two countries.

“We are miserable. The cold is now unbearable and we’ve been stranded here for two months away from our families,” Wali recently told RFE/RL’s Radio Mashaal.

“We are sick of this misery,” he said. “The two should resolve this problem once and for all.”

In the weeks that followed the diplomatic dispute, Kabul struck new deals to increase trade and open new routes with Iran, Central Asia, and India. The Taliban government called on Afghan traders and investors to seek new partners, suppliers and manufacturers away from Pakistan.

“This has been one of the most debilitating and tragic closures,” said Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Center for Research and Security Studies, a think tank in Islamabad.

“This has badly impacted tens of thousands of people from both sides — farmers, daily wage workers, traders and truckers,” he said.

Irreparable Losses

Nearly five decades of war and political turmoil have entangled the two countries in a complex web of population movements, trade, transport and mostly free movement across their porous border.

Before the border closure, bilateral trade between Islamabad and Kabul was between $2 billion and $3 billion annually, according to the Pak-Afghan Joint Chambers of Commerce and Industry (PAJCCI).

Islamabad was the dominant partner. Its exporters accounted for most of the trade and included industrial goods, pharmaceuticals, cement, and food. Kabul, on the other hand, sent its fresh and dry fruits to Pakistan. The country served as a major transit route for Afghan imports, generating considerable revenue.

Now Islamabad’s predicament is visible. Every winter, it sold more than $50 million worth of citrus fruits to Afghanistan and, via its routes, to its western Central Asian neighbors. But this year’s crops are being sold cheaply domestically.

Shahid Hussain, the senior vice president of the Sarhad Chamber of Commerce and Industries in the northwestern city of Peshawar, says the trade war has already caused irreparable losses to traders and investors in both countries.

“There is no way traders can recover from these losses,” he told RFE/RL’s Radio Mashaal. “Everything they had built over the past few decades has been ruined.”

In Peshawar, the fallout from the continued border closure is everywhere.

The city’s once-bustling gemstone market is silent. Most of its shops and offices are closed, as no raw stones used in ornaments and jewelry have crossed into Pakistan from Afghanistan.

Most of the minerals processed and refined in this market are mined in various parts of the Hindu Kush mountains, which shape and dominate the Afghan landscape.

“If the border continues to be closed, it will affect thousands of workers and associated businessmen,” said Abdul Jalil, the president of the Peshawar Gemstone Association.

‘Traders Cannot Absorb More Losses’

In Kabul, Younas Mohmand, a business leader, says insulating trade from the troubled bilateral relations between the two neighbors might provide a good beginning toward restoring ties.

“Business ties should resume in return for future guarantees from Pakistan,” he told RFE/RL’s Radio Azadi repeating the Taliban’s key demand from Islamabad. “Our traders cannot absorb more losses.”

Graeme Smith, a bestselling author and regional analyst, says Kabul will need Islamabad for major projects aimed at transforming it into a trade, transport and energy hub between Central Asia and South Asia.

“Like it or not, most of the big economic opportunities will require doing business with Pakistan,” he said.

First conceived nearly three decades ago, the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline project remains a pipe dream.

Similarly, sending Central Asia’s abundant hydropower to Pakistan and linking the region to Islamabad via a railway line would require stability within Central Asia and stable relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

By RFE/RL 

Pakistan-Afghanistan Fued Freezes $3 Billion in Annual Bilateral Trade
read more

U.S. Allocates $2 Billion to UN, Afghanistan Excluded from Aid

Khaama Press

The United States announced $2 billion in humanitarian aid for the United Nations, but Afghanistan will not be included due to political interference concerns.

The United States has announced $2 billion in humanitarian aid for the United Nations, though Afghanistan and Yemen will not be included in the assistance.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Monday that the new funding model aims to share the burden of UN humanitarian programs with other developed nations.

Officials described the amount as a fraction of past U.S. contributions, but still significant enough to maintain America’s position as the world’s largest humanitarian donor.

Afghanistan and Yemen, both facing severe humanitarian crises, were excluded due to political interventions in aid distribution, according to U.S. authorities.

American officials cited Taliban interference in Afghanistan and Houthi control in Yemen as the main reasons for withholding assistance from these countries.

The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) annually requests funding to support millions of vulnerable populations affected by conflict, natural disasters, and food insecurity.

Historically, the U.S. has been the largest contributor to global humanitarian efforts, though President Donald Trump’s administration reduced foreign aid and pressed the UN to downsize or eliminate programs.

The $2 billion allocation represents the first phase of U.S. support for the current UN humanitarian appeal, signaling continued engagement despite political and operational challenges.

Experts say excluding Afghanistan and Yemen highlights the growing impact of political interference on international aid and raises concerns about the effectiveness of humanitarian responses in conflict zones.

U.S. Allocates $2 Billion to UN, Afghanistan Excluded from Aid
read more

Afghanistan to remain major crisis in 2026, UN, partners warn

Humanitarian resources to support women and their children are diminishing in Afghanistan.
United Nations press office
December 30, 2025

025A mother holding a baby and guiding a young child through a field of rubble in Afghanistan, likely after a flood, under a clear blue sky.

© UNICEF/Mark Naftalin

Afghanistan is expected to remain one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises in 2026, UN agencies and humanitarian partners warned on Tuesday, launching a $1.7 billion appeal to assist nearly 18 million people in urgent need.

Years of conflict, compounded by worsening food insecurity, recurrent natural disasters, climate change impacts and large-scale returns of displaced people, have left an estimated 45 per cent of the population – some 21.9 million people – in need of humanitarian assistance next year.

Of those, 17.5 million people – more than three-quarters of them women and children – have been prioritised for support under the coordinated response.

Food and basic hygiene

Food security and sanitation remain among the most urgent needs.

The Afghanistan Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan projects that during the 2025-2026 lean season, more than one-third of Afghanistan’s population will face crisis-level or worse food insecurity, as defined by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC).

This means many households will meet minimum food needs only by depleting essential livelihood assets – a sharp deterioration compared with the previous year.

The ongoing drought has also led to the failure of nearly 80 per cent of rainfed wheat crops in several regions, leaving many families without food stocks for the winter.

Sanitation conditions are equally dire: an estimated 25 per cent of households relied on unimproved water sources this year, while 37 per cent lacked soap for basic hygiene.

The response will prioritise water, sanitation and hygiene needs in areas most affected by drought, cholera outbreaks, disasters and large-scale returns.

Returning home to crisis 

Afghanistan is facing one of the world’s largest and fastest-growing returnee-related displacement crises, with around five million people returning to the country this year.

More than 2.6 million Afghans returned from Iran and Pakistan, driven largely by tightened migration policies and deteriorating protection conditions.

Many have returned to districts already grappling with poverty, food insecurity, drought and limited access to basic services, further straining local capacities.

More aid for less

In 2026, humanitarian partners aim to reach more people with fewer resources.

The $1.71 billion required represents a 29 per cent reduction compared to the resources needed in 2025. Yet it aims to reach about 4 per more than the target last year.

These changes have been “driven by sharper prioritisation, notable efficiency gains, and a strategic shift away from high-cost, less sustainable interventions,” the response plan noted.

 

Afghanistan to remain major crisis in 2026, UN, partners warn
read more

‘That video saved our lives’: how women are defying the Taliban’s brutal crackdown on protest

Zahra Nader and Sayed Abdali for Zan Times

It was nearly dark on 19 January 2022 when the knocking began. At first soft, then insistent, the sound echoed through the flat in the Afghan capital, Kabul. Zarmina Paryani and her sisters froze. They had known this day was coming.

“We always knew the risks of protesting and we were prepared to die on the streets,” the 26-year-old activist told the Guardian. “But I never imagined they would come for us like that – in the middle of the night, breaking into our home.”

Just three days earlier, she and dozens of women had protested on the streets and burned a burqa in a symbolic act of defiance against the Taliban’s growing restrictions. The protest had been organised via WhatsApp groups and word of mouth.

The image of the burning burqa, shared on social media, had gone viral and ignited uproar among Taliban soldiers and supporters, who were demanding the women be stoned to death for disrespecting the garment. Now, they were at her door.

As masked men began forcing their way inside, Paryani says she made a desperate decision. “I couldn’t bear to be taken alive. I couldn’t watch them enter our bedroom, violate us or behead us in the night.” She jumped from the three-storey window.

Zarmina Paryani stands in an open urban space on an overcast day
Zarmina Paryani now lives in exile in Germany with her sisters. Photograph: Sayed Abdali

Miraculously, she survived the fall with minor injuries. Just as fortunately, before the Taliban could break down their door, her sister Tamana Paryani recorded a short video in which she screamed that the Taliban were outside. She sent the footage to a journalist and it was immediately posted on social media, with their arrest initially denied by the militants.

“That video saved our lives. It was the only weapon we had.”

Zarmina grew up in Panjshir, in a deeply religious family. For years, before she moved to Kabul, her education consisted only of mosque schooling. “From a young age, we were taught that women were ‘deficient in mind’. I believed it. I adjusted myself to it.”

But school brought questions. Why were her high marks never enough to prove her worth compared with her brother? Why did neighbours mock her for attending school at all? Her mother, who had been denied an education, encouraged her daughters to keep going. “She used to say: learn so you will never need to depend on a man.”

Zarmina trained as a midwife, but when the Taliban returned to power in August 2021, the small gains that women and girls had made evaporated overnight. “It felt like a storm had come. Everything we had, even the little things, they took away.”

In the early weeks of the takeover, a spontaneous women’s protest movement emerged. Largely leaderless, composed of ordinary women – students, police officers, teachers, midwives – it began as scattered, small-scale marches. Zarmina and her sisters joined.

“We didn’t tell our father. He would never have let us go. Like many families, they didn’t support the protests because they feared for our safety.”

They covered their faces with masks, met in secret, and hid signs inside black plastic bags. Sometimes they changed locations at the last minute to evade Taliban patrols. Their demands were simple: the right to study, to work, to live without fear.

“We were not affiliated with any political party. We were just women asking for our rights,” says another protester, who was detained and beaten by Taliban officials after a protest near Kabul University in December 2022.

By January 2022 and the raid on Zarmina’s home, the sporadic arrests had turned into a targeted suppression. The video her sister sent to the journalist spread across international media and prompted global outrage. But inside Afghanistan, the result was clear: dissent would be met with brutal force.

The Taliban were arriving at the site of protests sometimes before the protest had started, says Zarmina, with women repressed into silence.

Today, no women come to the street to protest. The last known public protest took place in west Kabul in September last year. Indoor protests, symbolic acts, such as dancing alone in a mosque or burning the burqa, are now the only forms of resistance.

Since the Taliban’s return to power, women and girls have been barred from nearly every aspect of public life: schools, universities, most jobs and even parks.

Zarmina spent 27 days in detention before being released and told: “If you speak again, we will cut your throat.”

People sit at a long table on a platform as an audience looks on
A session of the hearings for the People’s Tribunal for Women of Afghanistan, held in Madrid in October. Photograph: Courtesy of Rawadari

She managed to escape to Pakistan disguised in a burqa and plastic shoes and now lives in exile in Germany. “I don’t feel secure even here. And when I write or speak, I wonder: will my father be harmed? Will my family be punished?”

Despite her fears, she testified at the People’s Tribunal for Women of Afghanistan during a hearing in Madrid in October, one of the few venues where Afghan women have spoken publicly about gender apartheid under Taliban rule. “It didn’t change what happened to me, but at least it’s a record for history.”

Rashida Manjoo, chair of the Tribunal, said: “The systematic exclusion of women and girls [by the Taliban authorities] from education, employment, healthcare, freedom of expression, public life and freedom of movement constitute gender persecution.”

Zarmina and other anti-Taliban protesters in exile say they continue to get messages from girls in Afghanistan who have been pushed into marriage, or forced to do sex work to be able to afford to feed their children.

“We used to think the Taliban were just a group of religious men. Now we see what their rule really means. Maybe next time, people won’t be fooled. Sometimes I think this generation, with all this suffering, might finally learn who the real enemy is.”

Zahra Nader is editor-in-chief and Sayed Abdali a reporter at Zan Times journalist

‘That video saved our lives’: how women are defying the Taliban’s brutal crackdown on protest
read more

UN Reports Northern Afghanistan Farmers Struggle to Replace Opium Income

Khaama Press
December 29, 2025

A United Nations report on Monday, December 29, revealed that farmers in northern Afghanistan are struggling to replace income lost from opium cultivation, highlighting urgent economic and livelihood challenges.

A new United Nations report reveals that opium farmers in northern Afghanistan are struggling to replace lost income following bans on poppy cultivation. Surveys conducted in Badakhshan, Balkh, and Kunduz provinces show 85 percent of households have been unable to offset revenue losses, leaving communities in urgent need of economic support.

The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) noted that while poppy cultivation in Badakhshan has increased in certain areas, nearly 95 percent of former poppy farmers reported halting cultivation due to legal restrictions. Wheat and other grains have become the dominant alternative crops, cited by more than 90 percent of respondents.

Background reports indicate Afghanistan produces over 80 percent of the world’s opium, fueling a global narcotics trade. International efforts to reduce cultivation have historically faced challenges due to persistent rural poverty and limited alternative livelihoods.

Additional studies highlight how repeated droughts, irregular rainfall, and water scarcity have further reduced agricultural productivity. Families face constrained options for sustainable recovery, forcing many to revert to opium cultivation despite official bans.

The UN report emphasizes the severe economic shock to farming communities and calls for targeted humanitarian and livelihood interventions to support sustainable alternatives.

Meanwhile, analysts stress that without focused aid programs, Afghanistan rural populations risk deepening poverty and food insecurity. Support must include access to water, credit, and market linkages for alternative crops.

UNODC warns that the failure to implement effective substitution programs could undermine Afghanistan’s broader security and development objectives, potentially reversing recent gains against narcotics production.

Repeated droughts, irregular rainfall, and water shortages have significantly reduced agricultural productivity, leaving families with limited options for sustainable recovery. Despite efforts, the Taliban have so far been unable to eliminate opium cultivation in Afghanistan.

UN Reports Northern Afghanistan Farmers Struggle to Replace Opium Income
read more

Afghanistan Ranked Among Six Most Insecure Countries Globally Amid Rising Poverty, Migration, and Humanitarian Crisis

Khaama Press

Afghanistan is ranked among the world’s most insecure countries, with political instability, economic hardship, humanitarian crises, and restricted opportunities for women driving widespread migration and insecurity.

An international research institute has named Afghanistan as one of the six most insecure countries in the world. Following Afghanistan, Yemen, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Russia, and war-torn Ukraine were also identified among the least secure nations globally.

The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) noted that although armed conflicts have decreased since the Taliban returned to power, poor governance, humanitarian crises, and political instability continue to fuel insecurity. Security in Afghanistan, the report emphasizes, is not limited to armed clashes.

Data released on Saturday, December 27, show Afghanistan as the least secure country in South Asia. Factors such as widespread access to weapons by unaccountable groups, rising violent crime, political instability, and large-scale internal and external migration place the country at the bottom of global peace rankings.

According to the IEP, Afghanistan under Taliban rule ranks 158 out of 163 countries worldwide in terms of human security and peace. The report also notes that Afghanistan and Ukraine bear the highest economic costs of violence, exceeding 40 percent of their GDP.

The Global Peace Index, published annually by the Institute for Economics and Peace, identifies Iceland, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, and Switzerland as the world’s most peaceful countries, highlighting the importance of political stability, economic security, and social cohesion.

The report defines insecurity beyond armed conflicts, assessing social safety, internal and external tensions, and the degree of state militarization. True peace, according to the IEP, requires social, political, and economic stability, not just the absence of fighting.

Access to essential services is also a key indicator of social peace. Afghanistan’s health system is under severe strain due to declining foreign aid, with the World Health Organization reporting that 80 percent of its services were reduced this year because of budget shortfalls.

Afghanistan is also among the top four countries generating international refugees. By mid-2024, more than half of all registered refugees at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees came from Afghanistan, Syria, Ukraine, and Venezuela.

Despite the end of active conflict between the Taliban and Afghanistan’s former government, lack of economic opportunities, fear of Taliban enforcement, and restrictions on women’s education and employment have pushed many citizens to migrate abroad. These conditions undermine social and economic security for families.

Ongoing tensions between the Taliban and neighbouring countries such as Iran and Pakistan have led to mass expulsions of Afghan migrants. International organizations warn that Afghanistan’s current infrastructure and public services cannot accommodate the returning populations, increasing humanitarian and environmental pressures.

Afghanistan Ranked Among Six Most Insecure Countries Globally Amid Rising Poverty, Migration, and Humanitarian Crisis
read more

UNICEF Warns Funding Cuts Could Push Six Million Children Out of School by 2026

UNICEF warned that continued cuts to global education funding could deny schooling and essential services to six million children worldwide by 2026.

The UN children’s agency UNICEF has warned that continued cuts to global education funding could force up to six million children out of school by the end of 2026.

In a statement posted on X on Sunday, December 28, UNICEF said children in crisis-hit regions, including Somalia and Palestine, face losing access to schooling and essential services provided through schools.

UNICEF stressed that education for every child is “life-saving and life-changing,” urging donors and governments to shield learning systems from the impacts of conflict and humanitarian crises.

According to the agency, schools in fragile settings often serve as more than learning spaces, providing food, psychosocial support, and a sense of safety for vulnerable children.

Prolonged conflicts, displacement, climate shocks, and economic pressures have already disrupted education for millions worldwide, with funding gaps widening as humanitarian needs increase.

UNICEF warned that shrinking budgets threaten not only education but also children’s access to nutrition, mental health care, and protection services linked to schools.

The agency said the loss of these services could deepen long-term inequalities, increasing risks of child labour, early marriage, and exploitation.

Meanwhile, UNICEF called on international donors to urgently reverse funding cuts and prioritize education as a core humanitarian response.

It added that sustained investment in children’s education is critical to preventing a “lost generation” and ensuring stability and recovery in crisis-affected societies.

UNICEF Warns Funding Cuts Could Push Six Million Children Out of School by 2026
read more