American Dennis Coyle marks 1 year of detention in Afghanistan

By

Monday marks one year since Dennis Coyle, a 64-year-old academic from Colorado, was taken by force from his Kabul apartment by the Taliban. His abduction came just six days after another American, Ryan Corbett, was released at the start of President Trump’s second term.
Coyle, who spent nearly two decades in Afghanistan conducting language research, is being held by the Taliban General Directorate of Intelligence in near-solitary confinement with no charges filed, according to his family. Coyle’s capture so soon after Corbett’s release illustrates the ongoing risks faced by Americans in Afghanistan, even those with long-standing legal status and deep ties to local communities.

screenshot-2026-01-26-at-2-18-22-pm.png
Undated photo of Dennis Coyle, an American who is has been detained in Afghanistan by the Taliban since Jan. 26, 2025.Family of Dennis Coyle

“Dennis is a gentle, soft-spoken man who always listens deeply to others, often over a comforting cup of hot green tea, embodying the Afghan cultural emphasis of hospitality and respectful presence,” Molly Long, one of Coyle’s sisters, told CBS News. “In his nearly two decades in Afghanistan, Dennis faithfully honored the Afghan cultural values of hospitality and kindness.”

Coyle’s mother, Donna, 83, and his three sisters, Molly, Amy and Patti, have said the isolation has been crushing. He has missed births, family celebrations, and everyday moments. According to the family, Coyle is confined to a basement room, where he must ask permission to use the bathroom.

“This past year has been incredibly challenging for our family, as we’ve become entangled in the abhorrent practice of hostage diplomacy amid my brother’s wrongful detainment by the Taliban since January 27, 2025,” Long said. “We are deeply grateful for the broad bipartisan support we’ve received for President Trump to wield the formidable strength of the United States — as he has done so effectively in securing the release of over 90 hostages in Gaza, Venezuela, and around the world — to bring our brother home.”

“Our family is thankful and comforted that the president has personally committed to addressing this matter and taking a strong position on it, and we look forward to seeing Dennis again soon,” Long said.

Two Taliban officials insist Coyle is in good health and his “rights as a prisoner are protected.” They also claim formal court proceedings in his case would begin “soon.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In an interview in which Coyle’s case was raised last week, President Trump said he would “take a very strong position on it,” without elaborating further.

sistersdennis.jpg
Undated photo of American Dennis Coyle with his sisters. Coyle has been detained by the Taliban since Jan. 26, 2025.Photo provided by Dennis Coyle’s family

Last June, the U.S. government officially designated Coyle as wrongfully detained under the Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act, a status that unlocks select government tools and elevates the priority of efforts to secure his release.

“The Taliban should immediately release Dennis Coyle and all Americans detained in Afghanistan and end its practice of hostage diplomacy,” the State Department told CBS News in a statement. “We remind all Americans — do not travel to Afghanistan. The Taliban has detained Americans for years and the U.S. Government cannot guarantee your safety.”

The United States does not recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan’s legitimate government and lacks a diplomatic presence in the country, complicating release negotiations that are often conducted by Qatar as an intermediary on behalf of the U.S.

A Qatari official declined to comment on any involvement in mediating Coyle’s case.

Acknowledging Coyle’s detention, Taliban chief spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told CBS News, “Negotiations have indeed taken place and are ongoing; however, both sides have not yet reached a final conclusion.”

“The Afghan government remains committed to what has been discussed with the United States. It should also be noted that Afghans have been wrongly detained by the United States and continue to be held there. Their fate, as well as the suffering of their families, is similar to that experienced by others in detention.”

“These talks should lead to concrete results and a final conclusion, ensuring that prisoners from both sides are released,” Mujahid said.

The Biden administration held negotiations with the Taliban to swap Americans detained in Afghanistan for Muhammad Rahim al Afghani, a Guantanamo Bay detainee alleged to have been an associate of Osama bin Laden, but the talks ultimately fell through. U.S. officials proposed releasing Rahim in exchange for George Glezmann, Ryan Corbett and Afghan-American Mahmoud Habibi, who was abducted in 2022, while the Taliban countered by seeking Rahim and two others while denying it held Habibi.

With the help of Qatari negotiators, Corbett and another American, William McKenty, were released last January in exchange for a Taliban figure who had been imprisoned for life on drug trafficking charges. Glezmann and another American, Faye Hall, were released in March, followed by a fifth American, Amir Amiri, who was freed last September.

Another senior Taliban official who spoke with CBS News on condition of anonymity referred to Rahim and claimed the U.S. offered a timeframe of three to six months for releasing Rahim. “When we released U.S. citizens last time, the U.S. committed to releasing the last Afghan detainee from Guantanamo. We have already made many concessions. That is enough.”

In addition to Coyle, at least one other American — a former U.S. army soldier whose purpose for traveling to Afghanistan is unclear — is believed to be currently held by the Taliban.

The State Department has offered a $5 million reward for information leading to Habibi’s return.

“We are not aware of Habibi’s current status and we [have] not arrested him,” the second senior Taliban official told CBS News.

During the first Trump administration, the U.S. took steps to normalize relations with the Taliban, including troop withdrawal agreements and increased diplomatic contacts. Last September, President Trump expressed interest in regaining access to Bagram Air Base, underscoring a desire to maintain strategic leverage in Afghanistan, while Taliban officials have signaled interest in deeper engagement with the U.S.

That engagement has stalled to an extent as the U.S. has implemented sweeping restrictions that include suspending visa issuance and entry for Afghan nationals under recent national security proclamations, tightening vetting, and pausing processing of virtually all Afghan immigration and asylum applications. The moves have significantly reduced legal pathways for Afghans seeking entry or resettlement in the U.S.

The domestic policy debate intensified following a November 2025 shooting in Washington, D.C., in which an Afghan national evacuated to the U.S. after the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan allegedly killed a National Guardsman and wounded another. The suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, previously served for several years in Afghanistan’s elite “Zero Units,” paramilitary forces that operated under CIA direction.

Still, the Taliban and the United States remain in contact, Taliban sources said, noting former U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad visited Kabul earlier this month. White House counterterrorism advisor Seb Gorka and special envoy for hostage response Adam Boehler traveled to Afghanistan to broker Amiri’s release in September.

“We are very clear that we will not offer any further goodwill gestures,” one of the senior Taliban officials told CBS News.

Last September, the Trump administration created the State Sponsor of Wrongful Detention designation to target countries or groups that hold Americans without legal justification. Modeled after the state sponsors of terrorism designation, the measure would give the State Department authority to impose sanctions, export controls and travel restrictions on nationals of designated countries that detain Americans for political leverage, and to restrict where U.S. passports may be used. To date, no countries have been designated.

Coyle’s family has launched FreeDennisCoyle.com to coordinate advocacy and share updates.

American Dennis Coyle marks 1 year of detention in Afghanistan
read more

The Taliban Say They’re Ready to Release U.S. Prisoners. But Which Ones?

For months, U.S. and Afghan officials have secretly negotiated the release of U.S. detainees — a priority for President Trump and a nonnegotiable prerequisite for any further diplomatic engagement with the Taliban.

Yet even as at least five U.S. prisoners have been freed from Afghanistan over the past year, talks have stalled over the fate of remaining detainees, according to three people involved in the negotiations.

While several U.S. prisoners remain in custody, Afghan officials say the release of the last Afghan inmate at Guantánamo Bay rests with the United States and should be part of any further deal.

The Guantánamo inmate’s case and the whereabouts of a U.S. citizen in Afghan custody remain a central flashpoint between the Trump administration, which accuses Afghanistan of hostage diplomacy, and a Taliban government that denies those accusations while it seeks recognition from the United States.

“We want these two American detainees to be released, and, at the same time, the fate of our detainee who is in Guantánamo should be made clear,” Zabiullah Mujahid, the Taliban spokesman, said in an interview with The Times in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar — the first time Afghan officials are making their demand public. “Our prisoner should be released.”

The Afghan detainee, Muhammad Rahim, is accused of acting as a courier and interpreter for Osama Bin Laden within Al Qaeda.

Why the Taliban have decided to comment publicly on a potential prisoner swap is unclear. But it signals an impasse in negotiations with the Trump administration, which has publicly demanded the release of at least three Americans.

The Taliban say they have only two — identified by U.S. officials as Dennis Walter Coyle, an academic held since last January, and Polynesis Jackson, a former U.S. Army soldier whose reasons for being in the country remain murky.

Afghan officials say they do not know the whereabouts of a third U.S. citizen, Mahmood Habibi, who the F.B.I. says was arrested in Afghanistan in 2022 shortly after the C.I.A. killed Ayman al-Zawahri, Al Qaeda’s leader, in Kabul.

Afghanistan’s foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, said no American prisoner was being held for bargaining purposes. “We support finding a solution to this issue as soon as possible,” Mr. Muttaqi said in a subsequent interview with The Times in Kabul. “We never arrest someone to make deals with their country.”

Mr. Muttaqi added, “We want progress in all areas with the United States,” including the reopening of the U.S. embassy in Kabul and strengthened security cooperation.

The United States does not formally recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan’s legitimate authority, but U.S. envoys have traveled several times to Afghanistan over the past year to secure the release of American detainees. At least four have already been freed under the second Trump administration, according to the White House — none of them as part of prisoner swaps.

A participant in the negotiations, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing release efforts, said the Trump administration would not consider any further public engagement until all remaining U.S. citizens were freed.

“We know the Taliban abducted and detained Mahmood Habibi over three years ago,” a State Department spokesperson said. “The Taliban should immediately release Dennis Coyle, Mahmood Habibi and all Americans detained in Afghanistan and end its practice of hostage diplomacy.”

The previous administration had offered Mr. Rahim in a prisoner swap that included Mr. Habibi, but the Taliban rejected that offer, American officials say. Instead, the Taliban government freed Ryan Corbett and William Wallace McKenty last January in exchange for Khan Mohammed, a convicted drug dealer who was released from a U.S. federal prison. The Taliban later freed three other Americans — George Glezmann and Faye Hall in March; and Amir Amiry in September.

A senior U.S. official added that Mr. Rahim would not be part of any future deal despite the Taliban government’s demands.

“We have proof the Taliban’s G.D.I. arrested him, so they are only prolonging things by refusing to admit it,” Mr. Habibi said about the General Directorate of Intelligence, Afghanistan’s intelligence agency.

The Afghan intelligence services didn’t respond to requests for comment.

An Afghan official with direct knowledge of the negotiations said that the Taliban had released U.S. detainees last year, and the United States had lifted bounties on senior Afghan officials, as part of a framework meant to settle the prisoners’ issue. But recent developments, including the deadly attack on two National Guard troops that U.S. officials say was committed by a 29-year-old Afghan man near the White House in November, had brought the negotiations to a stalemate.

The Afghan official, speaking on condition of anonymity to comment on the negotiations, said the Taliban would be willing to discuss Mr. Habibi’s fate only after other U.S. detainees and Mr. Rahim had been released. Mr. Habibi was never part of the initial framework agreed upon last year, the official added, but Mr. Rahim was.

The circumstances surrounding the detention of Mr. Jackson, like Mr. Habibi’s, are more opaque.

On Tuesday, President Trump said in a television interview about Mr. Coyle’s detention by the Taliban, “I’m not happy about them holding anybody, especially if he’s not guilty of anything.”

Mr. Rahim, the Afghan prisoner, has been held in Guantánamo since 2008 and is the last Afghan citizen there. The United States says Mr. Rahim, now 60, had advanced knowledge of Al Qaeda attacks. He was subjected to “extensive use of the C.I.A.’s enhanced-interrogation techniques,” including sleep deprivation that once lasted nearly six days, according to the Senate Committee’s Report on the C.I.A.’s Use of Torture.

Mr. Rahim’s family says he did not do anything wrong and has asked the Taliban administration to secure his release.

He has never been charged with crimes while held in Guantánamo Bay.

Safiullah Padshah and Yaqoob Akbary contributed reporting.

Elian Peltier is an international correspondent for The Times, covering Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Adam Goldman is a London-based reporter for The Times who writes about global security.

The Taliban Say They’re Ready to Release U.S. Prisoners. But Which Ones?
read more

Islamic Emirate Seeks Release of Mohammad Rahim for Two Americans

Mohammad Rahim has been held at Guantanamo Bay since 2008 and, according to reports, is the last Afghan prisoner in U.S. custody.

The New York Times reported that the Islamic Emirate called for the release of the last Afghan detainee at Guantanamo Bay in exchange for the release of two American citizens.

Zabihullah Mujahid told The New York Times that the Islamic Emirate wants the release of the two American citizens to be accompanied by the release of Mohammad Rahim, the last Afghan still held at Guantanamo.

Mujahid stated: “We want these two American detainees to be released, and, at the same time, the fate of our detainee who is in Guantánamo should be made clear, Our prisoner should be released.”

A source familiar with the negotiations between the U.S. and the Islamic Emirate told The New York Times that talks over a prisoner exchange between Kabul and Washington have currently reached a deadlock.

A senior U.S. official also told the newspaper that, despite repeated requests from Afghanistan, Mohammad Rahim will not be part of any future agreement between the two sides.

Political analyst Fareedullah Zazai said: “If the U.S. accepts Kabul’s request, it could send a message to the world that the consequences of the war have come to an end. Another meaning of this message is that Kabul wants to transform technical ties into political relations.”

Mohammad Rahim has been held at Guantanamo Bay since 2008 and, according to reports, is the last Afghan prisoner in U.S. custody.

Although reports of his possible release emerged in late September 2025, the matter remains unresolved to date.

Islamic Emirate Seeks Release of Mohammad Rahim for Two Americans
read more

Licenses of several media organizations revoked in Afghanistan

Khaama Press

Ministry of Information and Culture said it has revoked the operating licenses of all journalist support organizations except three.

In a statement released on Monday, January 26, the ministry said only three organizations were permitted to continue operating, without naming them.

The ministry claimed the decision followed complaints from journalists and media outlets about the performance of journalist support organizations but provided no further details.

Since returning to power, the Taliban authorities have introduced increasing restrictions on media operations, including content regulations and limits on press freedom.

Journalists’ rights groups say Afghan reporters face growing professional, legal, and financial pressures, with many media outlets forced to shut down or reduce operations.

The ministry alleged that many of the organizations failed to effectively support journalists and instead damaged the international credibility of Afghanistan’s media sector.

No explanation was given regarding evaluation criteria, investigation procedures, or the specific reasons for revoking the licenses of individual organizations.

The decision comes as journalists in Afghanistan continue to face mounting restrictions, raising concerns about further pressure on media independence and freedom of expression.

Licenses of several media organizations revoked in Afghanistan
read more

Over 80% in Afghanistan Lack Access to Reliable Electricity: UNDP

Khaama Press

The United Nations Development Programme says Afghanistan is facing a severe and persistent energy crisis, with most citizens still lacking access to reliable and sustainable electricity services.

In a report published on Monday, January 26, UNDP stated that more than 80 percent of Afghanistan’s population does not have stable access to electricity, while existing infrastructure cannot meet rising demand.

Decades of conflict, chronic underinvestment, and damage to critical infrastructure have significantly weakened Afghanistan’s power sector, particularly in rural and underserved regions.

The report notes that Afghanistan depends heavily on electricity imports from neighboring countries, leaving the national grid vulnerable to technical failures and repeated supply disruptions.

UNDP said Afghan households receive an average of only five to ten hours of electricity daily, with unplanned power outages becoming a routine challenge across many provinces.

The United Nations warned that unreliable electricity is not only a burden for families but poses serious risks to hospitals, where power cuts can disrupt surgeries and emergency care.

UNDP emphasized that expanding sustainable energy production and strengthening domestic power generation are essential to safeguarding public services and improving living conditions nationwide.

Over 80% in Afghanistan Lack Access to Reliable Electricity: UNDP
read more

Aimal Wali Khan Criticizes Pakistan for Blocking Trade with Afghanistan

This comes amid repeated criticism from religious scholars and politicians over the government’s treatment of Afghanistan and tribal populations.

Pakistani politicians are increasingly voicing criticism of the central government’s policies. Recently, Aimal Wali Khan, leader of the Awami National Party (ANP), accused the Pakistani government of using terrorism as a political tool.

He stated that under the pretext of counterterrorism, trade with Afghanistan, primarily affecting the Pashtun population, has been halted, while trade with India continues unhindered. He insisted that despite closed trade routes, Afghanistan is still blamed for every security incident in Pakistan.

Aimal Wali Khan said: “Today, trade in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is shut down in the name of fighting terrorism, while trade with India continues. But trade with Afghanistan is not allowed, why? They say it’s because of terrorism. Fine, if there is terrorism, shut the routes and still allow trade.”

“But every time something happens in Pakistan, leaders come forward and say it came from Afghanistan. Then who are these blocked routes really for? Are they blocked for ordinary people? For trade?”

Speaking at a large gathering, he called for the immediate reopening of all trade routes between Bajaur and Chaman, emphasizing that the Pashtun trade corridors must be restored.

He added: “This jirga demands that all trade routes from Bajaur to Chaman be fully reopened. We do not support terrorism, it must be eradicated, but trade must be promoted. This jirga urges the government to fully open all trade routes.”

Also speaking at the gathering, Haider Khan Hoti, former Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, stated that military operations alone cannot eliminate terrorism unless there are fundamental changes in Pakistan’s internal and foreign policies.

This comes amid repeated criticism from religious scholars and politicians over the government’s treatment of Afghanistan and tribal populations. Despite such criticism, the government had previously ordered residents of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to vacate their homes for planned military operations.

Aimal Wali Khan Criticizes Pakistan for Blocking Trade with Afghanistan
read more

Petraeus: No Chance of Reconciliation Between Kabul and Washington

He also described the agreement with the current government as one of Washington’s weakest diplomatic deals.

David Petraeus, former Director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, has recently stated that, under current circumstances, the prospect of reconciliation and constructive engagement between Kabul and Washington seems very distant.

On this matter, Petraeus said: “This is a very difficult task and cannot happen because the prevailing view in Afghanistan has no alignment with Washington, not even on broad outlines. I don’t think reconciliation is possible right now.”

He also described the agreement with the current government as one of Washington’s weakest diplomatic deals.

In another part of his remarks, Petraeus said that the withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan was an unnecessary decision.

The former CIA chief and ex-commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan added: “Yes, I clearly said at the time that withdrawal was not necessary. We could have continued our presence and efforts in Afghanistan. The level of sustainability was measured against human and financial costs; we didn’t lose a single soldier in a year and a half, and the cost to the U.S. was $25 billion compared to a defense budget of $800 to $850 billion, which is not a large amount.”

Petraeus’s remarks indicate that relations between Washington and Kabul remain strained.

Several political analysts have differing views on this matter.

Najib Rahman Shamal, a political analyst, told TOLOnews: “They had to leave Afghanistan because the continued U.S. military presence would have prolonged and intensified the devastating war in the country.”

Earlier, the former NATO Secretary General had described the withdrawal from Afghanistan as the greatest defeat in the alliance’s history.

Petraeus: No Chance of Reconciliation Between Kabul and Washington
read more

At Pakistan’s Afghan border, a trade shutdown empties markets

By Haq Nawaz Khan and 

The Washington Post
January 25, 2026

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — In the sprawling fruit market in this northwestern Pakistani city, Imran has spent the past several months waiting for shipments that aren’t arriving.

The crates of Afghan walnuts, apricots and pomegranates he once hauled through the stalls have disappeared, casualties of Pakistan’s decision to close its border with neighboring Afghanistan.

Pakistan shut all major crossings along its roughly 1,600-mile border with Afghanistan in mid-October amid clashes with the Taliban-run government in Kabul. The sides eventually agreed to a ceasefire, but crossings remain closed to trade. It amounts to the longest border shutdown in living memory, locals say.

“It’s not enough to feed my family,” said Imran, who does not have a surname. He keeps coming to the empty market every day because he can’t bear the thought of staying home and explaining to his children why he’s not at work.

For decades, markets like this one in northwestern Pakistan, little more than an hour’s drive from the Afghan border, have served as a barometer of relations between the two countries. Previous border shutdowns typically lasted only days or weeks before they were resolved by local elders.

But the current standoff has turned one of Asia’s most sensitive borders into a source of mounting economic pain and political frustration for communities on both sides, while Islamabad and Kabul publicly downplay the costs.

Pakistani officials say the primary reason they closed the border — the Afghan government’s alleged support for a militant group in Pakistan — remains unaddressed by the Afghans. The Pakistanis accuse the Afghan Taliban of harboring the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, a group that has intensified attacks in northwestern Pakistan since the United States withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021.

Pakistan’s military chief has claimed that around two thirds of the attackers are Afghan. “Isn’t Afghanistan shedding the blood of our Pakistani children?” Chief of Defense Forces Asim Munir asked during a conference last month, the Pakistan’s state broadcaster reported.

The TTP has pledged allegiance to Afghan Taliban leader Haibatullah Akhundzada, but operates independently of Kabul. The Afghan Taliban have repeatedly denied harboring members of the group.

The Pakistani and Afghan governments both insist they can absorb the economic impact. Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban’s chief spokesman, said the borders would reopen only if Pakistan provided “strong assurances that this unlawful blockade will not happen again for political purposes.”

Pakistani military spokesman Lt. Gen. Ahmad Sharif Chaudhry says the closures have caused “no losses” to Pakistan but have instead curbed “smuggling and terrorism.”

Here in Peshawar, those claims ring hollow. When crossings were open, Afghan produce flowed east into Pakistan in steady convoys of trucks, feeding wholesale markets and sustaining thousands of laborers. An estimated 700 to 900 trucks passed daily through the Torkham crossing alone.

The prices of some fruits and vegetables in Pakistan have risen by as much as 400 percent since the border was closed, traders say, as supplies from Afghanistan have dwindled. Before the shutdown, Pakistan was Afghanistan’s largest trading partner, accounting for over half of Afghan exports in 2023, much of it fresh fruit and agricultural produce, and about one-fifth of its imports.

The disruption has rippled beyond agriculture. Pakistani exports of cement and pharmaceuticals to Afghanistan and fruits to other parts of Central Asia have also been hit, compounding losses for industries that rely heavily on overland trade routes.

Pakistan, with deep-sea ports in the south and access to global supply chains, is far less dependent on Afghan trade, but the economic strain in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province is fueling long-standing grievances about Islamabad’s alleged neglect of the region. Many Pakistani traders here now echo the Taliban’s rhetoric.

“Trade and politics should be separated,” said Mujeeb ur Rehman, president of the association of customs clearing agents at the Torkham border.

For much of the 20th century, residents of the border region crossed freely between the two countries. During the 1980s, Pakistani officials encouraged the flow, shepherding weapons and fighters to support the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet invasion and occupation.

When militant violence later spilled back into Pakistan, Islamabad built a fence along most of the frontier, dividing communities and deepening resentment.

At Torkham, Rehman, the customs agents’ representative, estimated that the current closure has left up to 3,000 local workers and more than 1,000 customs agents unemployed. The revenue collected from transit fees was shared with surrounding communities. “Pakistan was making billions of rupees from its exports,” he said.

The consequences in Afghanistan could be more severe. Fruits and vegetables are among the country’s main exports, and when the border was closed in October, many shipments were left to rot. Routing goods through Iran or Central Asia is far costlier and slower, said Haji Farooq, a fruit trader in Kabul. He estimated that up to 80 percent of Afghan produce has been caught in limbo.

Though the border is closed to trade, Pakistan has continued to deport Afghans. More than 1.6 million Afghans have been pressured to leave Pakistan since 2023 in one of the largest deportation drives in decades.

The large share of Afghanistan’s medicines that was previously supplied by Pakistan is now also caught in the trade impasse. Taliban officials say they are seeking alternative sources, including India, which has moved to capitalize on the tensions. New Delhi, Islamabad’s archrival, launched airfreight corridors with Afghanistan in December to ship pharmaceuticals and other essential goods.

A permanent shift would be costly for Pakistan, said Junaid Altaf, a representative of Pakistan’s trade industry: “Millions of dollars were invested.”

“But ultimately, this is about politics and ego,” said Muhammad Ishaq, another Pakistani trade representative. While Pakistan may have less to lose than Afghanistan, he said, a lasting rupture in trade “could still be a serious blow.”

Noack reported from Bangkok.

At Pakistan’s Afghan border, a trade shutdown empties markets
read more

UN Deputy Chief Meets in Kabul to Discuss Humanitarian Aid and Doha Process

United Nations Under-Secretary-General Rosemary DiCarlo visited Kabul to advance UN-led talks on humanitarian aid, counter-narcotics, and the Doha process framework.

Rosemary DiCarlo, the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, arrived in Kabul on Saturday to advance key UN-led consultations.

The visit focused on the ongoing humanitarian, economic, and political challenges facing Afghanistan, as UN officials continue to coordinate assistance and maintain international dialogue.

During meetings with Taliban Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani on Sunday, discussions included engagement with the international community, counter-narcotics cooperation, economic stability, private sector restrictions, and effectiveness of humanitarian aid programs. Haqqani claimed efforts against drug production and trafficking have produced positive results, a frequent assertion made by Taliban officials since 2022.

Afghanistan remains heavily dependent on humanitarian assistance amid economic isolation, banking restrictions, and widespread poverty, with UN agencies warning of prolonged vulnerability for millions.

The UN-led Doha process was launched to establish structured political dialogue on Afghanistan, bringing together the Taliban, regional states, and international stakeholders under UN facilitation.

DiCarlo reaffirmed the United Nations’ commitment to continued humanitarian assistance and emphasized the importance of sustained engagement. Working groups established under the third phase of the Doha talks are expected to hold their next meetings in Kabul.

DiCarlo also met Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi to discuss the Doha dialogue framework and future consultations, underscoring the UN’s role in facilitating dialogue.

The meetings highlight ongoing UN efforts to maintain dialogue and coordination in Afghanistan, addressing humanitarian needs while navigating complex political and economic challenges.

UN Deputy Chief Meets in Kabul to Discuss Humanitarian Aid and Doha Process
read more

Uzbek Power Supply Drop Leaves Kabul With Hours of Daily Outages

Citizens are calling on authorities to urgently resolve the issue.

A technical issue with the 220-kilovolt electricity line imported from Uzbekistan has led to power shortages in Kabul, causing serious problems for residents.

Citizens are calling on authorities to urgently resolve the issue.

Abdul Rahman, a Kabul resident, said: “We’re facing many problems due to power cuts. We’re students living in rented rooms, and we only get electricity for 4 to 5 hours in 24 hours.”

Another resident, Ajmal, said: “We get power for only 3 or 4 hours a day, and even then, it comes and goes every 10 minutes.”

Meanwhile, the spokesperson for Da Afghanistan Breshna Sherkat (DABS), the national power company, says efforts are underway to resolve the issue and meet public needs.

He added that thermal electricity from Tarakhil Power Plant has also been activated to help address the shortage.

DABS spokesperson Mohammad Sadiq Haqparast said: “In response, we are supplying thermal power from the Tarakhil Power Plant. Though it is very costly, consuming between 160,000 to 200,000 liters of fuel every 10 hours.”

Economic analyst Mohammad Nabi Afghan said: “The only long-term solution to our power problems is to become self-sufficient. We have many natural resources and should utilize them.”

This situation comes as recent snowfall has not only blocked key roads in some provinces but also disrupted power transmission lines.

Due to this weather, the 220-kilovolt transmission line from Uzbekistan has faced technical issues between Pul-e-Khumri and Kabul, leading to reduced electricity supply in Kabul and 12 other provinces.

Uzbek Power Supply Drop Leaves Kabul With Hours of Daily Outages
read more