Between Pakistan and Afghanistan, a Trade War With No End in Sight

One of Peshawar’s largest markets in western Pakistan once bustled with thousands of Afghan-owned shops and carts, selling everything from deep-fried khajoor pastries to kitchen items and cricket gear.

But business has been cut by half, according to business owners, and the market’s alleys have become so sparse that shoppers can walk freely along its stalls without elbowing through crowds. And aid shipments urgently needed in Afghanistan are piling up at Pakistani ports.

“Afghans are afraid of going outside,” said Hameed Ullah Ayaz, an Afghan owner of 12 bakeries in Peshawar.

Amid the deepest erosion of relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan in decades, the Pakistani government has cut off cross-border trade. It is aiming to punish the Taliban administration for failing to rein in affiliated militants who attack Pakistan and find refuge on the other side of the border.

The suspension of trade is hurting millions of farmers, traders and members of close-knit communities in Afghanistan and Pakistan as trucks full of coal, cement, pomegranates, cotton, medicines and other goods worth $2 billion in bilateral trade last year have not crossed in nearly two months.

Afghanistan has scrambled to shift trade routes. Yet Pakistan, with its market of 250 million consumers and the land access it offers to India, has been vital to a beleaguered Afghan economy, which has already been hit this year by aid cuts worth hundreds of millions of dollars, two deadly earthquakes and the forced return of more than 2.5 million Afghans from neighboring countries.

Near Peshawar and along the nearby road that runs through the border, hundreds of container-laden trucks and trailers have sat idle since Oct. 11. Some have been pushed off the road onto the dusty ground. Border guards have barred most crossings, except for Afghan nationals leaving Pakistan.

“When they stopped us here, it was still summer,” Abdul Wakeel, an Afghan driver, said on a recent afternoon as he sipped tea on a threadbare carpet at the Torkham border crossing between Pakistan and Afghanistan. “Now winter is right upon us.”

Pakistan accuses the Taliban government in Afghanistan of supporting a resurgent insurgency that has killed hundreds of Pakistani security forces in recent years and that struck its capital last month. The Taliban administration has denied supporting Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, also known as Pakistani Taliban or T.T.P., and claims that the violence faced by Pakistan is its own problem.

Pakistan has responded by expelling more than a million Afghans this year and carrying out airstrikes on Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, and in Kandahar, where the Taliban’s leader lives. Dozens of soldiers from both armies were killed in cross-border clashes this fall.

A cease-fire declared in October hangs by a thread. Mediation efforts by Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia have yielded no result. And the trade war seems to have no end in sight as both governments have geared up for more hostilities.

Pakistan and Afghanistan have repeatedly closed their border since the Taliban reclaimed power in 2021. But Shahid Hussain, a Pakistani representative of traders with more than two decades of experience with Afghanistan, said he had never witnessed such prolonged volatility.

“The Taliban are indicating that things aren’t going to get better anytime soon with Pakistan, and the Pakistani military won’t let up on this,” said Azeema Cheema, the founding director of Verso Consulting, an Islamabad-based research firm. “There doesn’t seem to be any path.”

Trade representatives and economic analysts say both sides are shooting themselves in the foot with a trade war.

Until this fall, Afghanistan used to rely on Pakistan for more than 40 percent of its exports. Pakistan-imported cement fueled a construction boom in Kabul and other cities, while medicine coming from its larger neighbor filled its pharmacy shelves.

Pakistan is facing a rising poverty rate of 25 percent, its highest in nearly a decade.

“The two are hypocrites,” said Syed Naqeeb Badshah, the president of a lobbying group representing Afghan traders in Pakistan.

Nowhere has the effect of the trade suspension been felt harder than in border areas and places like Peshawar, which was a major hub on the old Silk Road and is now a bustling city of two million people with a sizable Afghan population, about 30 miles from Afghanistan.

Afghan shop and cart owners running most of the 7,000 businesses in the Afghan Board Market have reported considerable losses, Mr. Badshah said. Affluent Afghan traders have been withdrawing funds from Pakistani banks out of fear of Pakistan’s expulsion drive. Pakistani business partners have grown wary of doing business with them as they also fear that Afghans might be forced to leave.

“We’re caught in between the politics of two countries,” Mr. Badshah said from his office overlooking the market.

On the other side of the border, Afghan farmers have lost their main business destination. In the southeastern province of Kandahar, they were about to export months of harvest, including Afghanistan’s famed pomegranates.

Abdullah Khan, a farmer, said that he was sending his fruits at a discounted price to Afghan cities instead, and that he did not know how he would pay back the $15,000 he borrowed to rent three orchards this year.

The Taliban administration has been seeking new business routes: India announced last month that it would launch air cargo services with Afghanistan “very soon,” and Afghanistan’s and Iran’s chamber of commerces signed a trade agreement last month to boost bilateral exchanges.

The World Bank said in a recent report that Afghan exports had increased by 13 percent from September to October as Afghan traders had managed to redirect shipments through Iran and Central Asia.

Mr. Ayaz, the Afghan businessman, who employs more than 100 Pakistani workers in his 12 bakeries in Peshawar, said a diplomat from the Afghan Consulate had urged him to move to Afghanistan during a recent impromptu visit to his factory. He would receive free land and housing in Afghanistan, the consulate employee told him.

“The guys wouldn’t be able to pay for half of it,” Mr. Ayaz, 41, said about the Taliban administration and the assets he had accumulated in 20 years of business in Pakistan.

Like many Afghans, Mr. Ayaz, who was born in Pakistan and has spent his life there, faces deportation as the Pakistani authorities have stopped renewing visas and urged all Afghans to move out.

“If I’m deported, I will go back with dignity,” Mr. Ayaz said as two of his sons and his Pakistani associate listened to him in silence.

Wasim Sajjad contributed reporting from Peshawar, and Taimoor Shah from Kandahar, Afghanistan.

Elian Peltier is an international correspondent for The Times, covering Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Between Pakistan and Afghanistan, a Trade War With No End in Sight
read more

Saudi Delegation to Visit Afghanistan, Pakistan for Further Talks

After the failure of previous talks between Afghanistan and Pakistan in Istanbul, regional efforts to ease tensions between the two sides have intensified.

BBC, citing its sources, has reported that during recent negotiations between Afghanistan and Pakistan in Riyadh, both sides agreed to uphold a ceasefire.

According to the report, although no formal agreement was reached during the talks, a delegation from Saudi Arabia is expected to visit Afghanistan and Pakistan for further consultations.

Yousuf Amin Zazai, a political analyst, stated: “Our problem with Pakistan is clear. Pakistan must stop its hostility toward the Afghan people. That’s the foundation of the discussion. Is Pakistan ready for that? If so, we are ready to negotiate in any country and on any issue.”

While it is not yet clear when the Saudi delegation will visit Afghanistan and Pakistan, several sources speaking to the BBC on condition of anonymity said that during the recent talks in Riyadh, Afghan and Pakistani delegations committed to continuing the dialogue.

Aziz Maarij, another political analyst, remarked: “Pakistan does not want peace, because it’s a project. They aim to delay the process, bring delegations back and forth, while Pakistan pursues its own goals during this time.”

After the failure of previous talks between Afghanistan and Pakistan in Istanbul, regional efforts to ease tensions between the two sides have intensified.

Just a day earlier, Iran’s Foreign Ministry also announced its readiness to assist in reducing tensions between Kabul and Islamabad.

Saudi Delegation to Visit Afghanistan, Pakistan for Further Talks
read more

UNAMA: Mission Serves as Bridge Between Int’l Community, Islamic Emirate

The UN official added that human rights, particularly the situation of women and girls, is a key part of the mission’s responsibilities.

Georgette Gagnon, the Acting Head of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) stated the organization functions as a bridge between the international community and the current government in Afghanistan.

In an interview with TOLOnews, Gagnon emphasized that the UN is working to help reintegrate Afghanistan into the international community and to ensure the country remains committed to its global obligations.

She said that based on the mandate given to UNAMA by the UN Security Council, the mission acts as a bridge between the international community and the current authorities in Afghanistan. According to her, the mandate also includes highlighting the situation of the Afghan people. Emphasizing that the UNAMA’s efforts are focused on helping Afghanistan rejoin the international system and uphold its commitments.

The UN official added that human rights, particularly the situation of women and girls, is a key part of the mission’s responsibilities.

She stated that the organization is working with the Afghan people and other agencies to ensure the timely delivery of humanitarian aid.

She added: “We work to promote human rights, address the situation of women and girls, and ensure that all those in need of humanitarian assistance receive it. International organizations and UNAMA are collaborating on this. Overall, we are working inside Afghanistan with various communities to help improve the conditions of families, society, and the country as a whole.”

Her remarks on reintegrating Afghanistan into the international community and adhering to global commitments come as the spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate previously stated that the UN mission had not been able to provide effective political representation in the country.

Sayed Muqadam Amin, a political affairs analyst, commented: “Although UNAMA has not been very successful during its years of operation in Afghanistan, the country now needs such efforts, and if UNAMA chooses to act, it can be effective in this area.”

UNAMA was established in 2002 by the UN Security Council at the request of the then-Afghan government.

Its current mandate has been extended until March 17, 2026.

UNAMA: Mission Serves as Bridge Between Int’l Community, Islamic Emirate
read more

UN Warns Up to 30% of Staff in Afghanistan Women-Led Organisations Could Be Laid Off

Khaama Press

The United Nations warned that up to 30% of staff in Afghanistan’s women-led organisations could be laid off due to severe funding shortages.

UN Women has warned that women-led organisations in Afghanistan may be forced to lay off up to 30 percent of their female employees due to severe funding cuts, raising fears of an even deeper humanitarian and protection crisis for women and girls.

In a statement posted Monday on X as part of the global 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence campaign, the agency said these organisations form the “backbone” of Afghanistan’s support network for women and girls, providing legal aid, safe spaces, counselling, and access to basic services.

The UN added that many women-led civil society groups are now operating with sharply reduced budgets. Earlier assessments showed that these organisations have already lost around one-fifth of their funding since the Taliban returned to power.

The warning comes at a time when access to services for women has sharply deteriorated. With previous protection systems dismantled and civil society restricted, millions of Afghan women and girls now have nowhere to turn for help, UN Women said.

Humanitarian conditions in Afghanistan continue to worsen. OCHA warned on Monday, December 8 that more than 17 million people are expected to face hunger and severe humanitarian need in 2026, driven by economic collapse, drought, displacement and shrinking aid supplies.

The situation has further deteriorated due to Taliban restrictions banning Afghan women from working with the United Nations and aid agencies in most provinces for nearly three months, a policy that has severely limited humanitarian access to vulnerable families.

At the same time, the return of displaced Afghans has intensified pressure on already strained services. Iranian media reported that more than 1.8 million Afghan migrants were deported or forced to return from Iran this year alone, with thousands more returning from Pakistan.

UN agencies and rights groups warn that without urgent funding and the reinstatement of women’s participation in humanitarian work, millions of Afghanistan women and girls risk becoming “invisible, unprotected, and unreachable.”

Humanitarian organisations are calling on the international community to restore funding, protect frontline Afghanistan women-led groups, and ensure that aid operations remain inclusive and gender-responsive despite escalating restrictions.

UN Warns Up to 30% of Staff in Afghanistan Women-Led Organisations Could Be Laid Off
read more

Pakistan’s army chief has warned Kabul to choose between maintaining relations with Islamabad or continuing alleged support for the Pakistani Taliban, amid rising tensions.

Khaama Press

December 9, 2025

Pakistan has issued a sharp warning to Afghanistan’s Taliban authorities, urging them to choose between maintaining relations with Islamabad or continuing support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

The Associated Press reported on Monday, December 8, that Pakistan’s army chief, General Asim Munir, made the remarks during a meeting with military officers in Rawalpindi. He said the Taliban must decide whether they will support the TTP, which he described as responsible for a surge in deadly attacks, or preserve ties with Pakistan.

Munir’s warning comes amid growing security concerns, as Pakistan accuses the Taliban of allowing TTP fighters to operate freely from Afghanistan soil. He previously alleged that the Taliban were backing militants linked to India, a claim Kabul has strongly rejected.

The army chief stressed that Pakistan “will not allow cross-border terrorism” to threaten its security or stability. He added that recent attacks linked to the TTP had crossed what Pakistan considers an acceptable threshold.

Relations between Islamabad and the Kabul have deteriorated sharply in recent months, with both sides exchanging accusations over support for militant groups and responsibility for cross-border violence. The dispute has raised new concerns among regional powers about worsening instability along the Afghanistan-Pakistan frontier.

A Qatar-mediated ceasefire in October briefly eased tensions, but subsequent talks in Istanbul failed to produce progress. Analysts say the stalled negotiations and hardened rhetoric indicate further deterioration in bilateral ties.

Pakistan’s army chief has warned Kabul to choose between maintaining relations with Islamabad or continuing alleged support for the Pakistani Taliban, amid rising tensions.
read more

India Condemns Pakistan’s Attacks On Afghanistan That Killed Civilians

India on Monday condemned Pakistan’s fresh attacks on Afghanistan that killed several civilians.

Fresh clashes between the two sides erupted less than two months after both sealed a ceasefire pact to end weeks of fighting.

“We have seen reports of border clashes in which several Afghan civilians have been killed,” Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at his weekly media briefing.

“We condemn such attacks on innocent Afghan people. India strongly supports the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Afghanistan,” he said.

A spokesperson of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan said Pakistan initiated the attacks and that Kabul was “forced to respond”.

The border conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan began in early October, following a Pakistani airstrike on Kabul.

Afghanistan strongly responded to the attack, following which the conflict escalated.

The hostilities erupted while Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi was visiting India. The clashes were the worst since the Taliban seized power in 2021.

The two sides entered into a ceasefire agreement on October 19, following talks brokered by Qatar and Turkiye.

India Condemns Pakistan’s Attacks On Afghanistan That Killed Civilians
read more

CM Afridi: Torkham Closure Deepens Migrant, Driver Hardship

Sohail Afridi added that this situation has also worsened the plight of Afghan migrants stranded near the hypothetical Durand Line.The Ch

ief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has stated that the continued closure of the Torkham crossing has caused serious challenges for truck drivers on the other side of the hypothetical Durand Line.

Sohail Afridi, in a meeting with several Khyber Pakhtunkhwa officials, added that this situation has also worsened the plight of Afghan migrants stranded near the hypothetical Durand Line. He urged local authorities to treat Afghan migrants with kindness.

Afridi said: “The Torkham crossing has been closed for nearly 55 days, and this situation has created many problems for truck drivers and our Afghan brothers and sisters. I have asked the Khyber district commissioner to ensure the best care for the drivers, workers, and our Afghan brothers and sisters, making sure they lack nothing in terms of food or shelter. If any problem arises, we are ready to provide full assistance.”

Meanwhile, the High Commission for Addressing Refugee Issues reported that on Saturday alone, 513 Afghan families were forcibly deported from Pakistan.

A day earlier, the Pakistani government gave Afghan migrants in several camps less than a week to leave the country.

Ehsan Ahmadzai, a migrant rights activist, said: “The governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan need to recognize the situation of migrants as a humanitarian issue, not a political one.”

This pressure on Afghan migrants comes as the Chaman–Spin Boldak crossing was reopened for Afghan migrants early this morning, after being closed the previous day due to clashes between Afghan forces and Pakistani troops.

CM Afridi: Torkham Closure Deepens Migrant, Driver Hardship
read more

Afghanistan’s Trade Via Alternate Routes Bypasses Pakistan Closures

Khaama Press
Ankit Kumar, Assistant Professor (Research) at SICSSL, specializes in modern warfare, geopolitics, and nuclear policy. He has consulted for India’s Ministry of External Affairs and Defense and contributed to leading think tanks and international publications. He is pursuing a PhD on nuclear policy ambiguity with India as a case study.

Afghanistan’s authorities have intensified efforts to diversify trade corridors, gradually reducing dependence on Pakistan following repeated and lengthy border closures that have disrupted bilateral commerce. Major crossings such as Torkham and Chaman – which previously accounted for an estimated 40 percent of Afghanistan’s official trade – experienced extended shutdowns throughout late 2024 and into 2025 amid escalating allegations related to cross-border militancy and security incidents. These closures, often lasting several weeks, have reportedly inflicted monthly losses exceeding USD 200 million on Afghan exporters of perishable fruits, vegetables, and dried nuts. Imports of fuel, wheat, and pharmaceuticals were also delayed, contributing to domestic inflation and periodic shortages. In response, Kabul has increasingly prioritised alternative routes, including India via Iran’s Chabahar Port and new air links, alongside expanded overland connections with Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan, aiming to build a more resilient, multipolar trade network less vulnerable to sudden disruptions.

The deterioration in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations since 2021 has intensified tensions. Islamabad’s concerns regarding Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) activities inside Afghanistan and Kabul’s objections to Pakistan’s visa restrictions have compounded mistrust. The situation escalated in October 2025 during border clashes that prompted indefinite closures under counter-terrorism justifications. Prior to these developments, annual bilateral trade was estimated between USD 2.5 and 3 billion, with Afghanistan exporting around USD 1.5 billion in agricultural produce while importing fuel and basic commodities through Karachi and Gwadar ports. That figure is now believed to have fallen below USD 1 billion. Afghan agricultural products, such as grapes, have reportedly sold for significantly higher prices in Pakistani markets amid supply volatility, while hundreds of Afghan and Pakistani cargo trucks were left stranded near border points. Analysts suggest that although Pakistan sought to pressure Kabul regarding militant sanctuaries, the interruptions have also reduced Pakistan’s leverage as Afghan traders increasingly rely on costlier yet more predictable alternative routes.

A central component of this shift is the Chabahar International Transport and Transit Corridor, where India has maintained a long-term investment strategy. New Delhi’s USD 500 million contribution to Chabahar, operational since 2018, offers Afghanistan direct access through Iranian ports without requiring Pakistani transit. During Afghan Acting Industry Minister Nooruddin Azizi’s visit to India in November 2025, the sides discussed streamlined visas, lower air-freight tariffs, and expanded cargo flights from Delhi, Amritsar, and Mumbai to Kabul, with the objective of raising bilateral trade toward USD 1 billion. Chabahar has already facilitated the delivery of 1.5 million tonnes of Indian wheat and pulses since 2022. More recently, Afghan pomegranates and raisins have reached Indian markets within days rather than weeks. Although U.S. sanctions complicate Iranian port operations, Chabahar’s reduced docking fees and quicker customs processing have reportedly increased cargo volumes by 30 percent year-on-year.

Northern trade corridors to Central Asia also present expanding opportunities. Trade with Uzbekistan was estimated at USD 1.1 billion in 2024, supported by the Hairatan rail terminal and the Termez bridge, with 2025 targets approaching USD 2 billion across commodities including Uzbek flour, machinery, and Afghan minerals. Turkmenistan’s Torghundi crossing has seen fuel and construction material volumes rise, while Kazakhstan has proposed a USD 3 billion regional transport roadmap focused on road upgrades and dry ports. Afghanistan’s participation in the Ashgabat Agreement since 2018 underpins multimodal rail-and-road connectivity extending toward the Caspian region and aligning with segments of China’s Belt and Road Initiative through the Wakhan Corridor. Taliban officials, including Deputy Prime Minister Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, have encouraged Afghan traders to prioritise alternative routes, describing Pakistan’s measures as economically restrictive. Supporters of diversification argue that Afghanistan could gain a more central role as a regional transit hub, including potential energy import and export projects such as CASA-1000.

The diversification approach, however, faces significant constraints. Infrastructure limitations – including inadequate road quality, insufficient cold-chain storage, and limited rail connectivity – raise transportation costs by an estimated 20 to 40 percent for time-sensitive exports. Security risks persist on northern routes, while fluctuating Iranian transit regulations and tariffs in Central Asia add additional challenges. Afghanistan’s projected economic growth of around 2.5 percent in 2025 remains closely tied to imports, and customs revenues have reportedly fallen by roughly 25 percent due to border disruptions. Humanitarian concerns persist regarding wheat imports, particularly during drought periods. Nevertheless, analysts argue that forced diversification may create opportunities in value-added processing of Afghan agricultural products, expanded mineral exports to Asian markets, and joint logistics ventures that could gradually narrow the country’s approximately USD 6 billion trade deficit.

These evolving trade patterns also carry broader geopolitical implications. Pakistan risks strategic isolation as Afghanistan deepens economic cooperation with India and Central Asian states, while emerging transit alternatives potentially dilute the influence of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). For Afghanistan, long-term success will depend on sustained infrastructure investment and diplomatic engagement, including efforts to secure sanctions relief for Iranian-linked ports. If diversification strategies continue and logistical barriers are addressed, Afghan officials estimate that non-Pakistani trade could rise to USD 10 billion by 2027. While the current shift has been shaped by prolonged border tensions, policymakers emphasise that a broader network of trade partners may offer Afghanistan greater economic resilience and stability in the years ahead.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Khaama Press.

Afghanistan’s Trade Via Alternate Routes Bypasses Pakistan Closures
read more

UN Security Council to Hold Meeting on Afghanistan Amid Growing Rights Concerns

 

The UN Security Council will meet this week to review Afghanistan’s worsening rights situation and humanitarian crisis, amid growing international concern.

The United Nations Security Council will convene a new session on Afghanistan this week as international concern mounts over human rights restrictions and worsening humanitarian conditions.

The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said on Sunday that the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 10. The agenda has not yet been fully disclosed.

Diplomats expect the session to address political developments, humanitarian access, and human rights conditions under Taliban rule. Aid groups say millions across the country remain dependent on emergency support, with funding gaps threatening critical relief efforts.

The meeting comes as the UN and international observers express renewed alarm over restrictions on Afghanistan women. UN Women noted last week that Afghan women employees have been barred from entering UN offices in the country for more than three months.

“The bans must be lifted,” the agency said, warning the limitations hinder life-saving assistance and violate fundamental human rights obligations.

Rights groups and Western governments have repeatedly urged the Taliban to reverse policies restricting education, employment, and public participation for women and girls. The Taliban maintain the measures are temporary and aligned with their interpretation of Islamic principles.

The UN is expected to brief member states on the humanitarian situation, ongoing engagement with Taliban authorities, and the status of aid delivery amid shrinking operational space.

Analysts say the meeting may set the tone for future international policy on Afghanistan, including sanctions, recognition debates, and humanitarian funding ahead of next year’s aid cycle.

UN Security Council to Hold Meeting on Afghanistan Amid Growing Rights Concerns
read more

Pakistan Claims 23 Killed in Afghanistan Chaman Border Strikes

Geo News reported on Sunday, December 7, that Pakistani forces targeted three Taliban bases along the Chaman border on Friday and Saturday, killing at least 23 fighters.

Pakistani forces launched strikes on three Taliban bases near the Chaman border over Friday and Saturday, killing at least 23 fighters. Media reports said the operation followed Taliban firing across the border, which was described as an “unprovoked” ceasefire violation.

So far, officials in Kabul have not commented on the Pakistani media claim, and there has been no independent confirmation of the reported casualties.

Officials in Kabul, however, have reported that five people, including women and children, were killed in the cross-border clashes, and have not confirmed the higher casualty figures claimed by Pakistani media.

Earlier, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid confirmed the attacks in Spin Boldak district, Kandahar province, stating that Taliban fighters were “forced to respond” after Pakistani forces struck their positions.

Tensions along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border have risen sharply in recent weeks, resulting in multiple casualties on both sides. The clashes underscore the continuing volatility and security challenges in the border regions.

Separately, the Pakistani military reported operations in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, which killed 14 militants, including nine from Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and five from the Baloch Liberation Army. Security forces said they also seized weapons and ammunition during the operations.

Pakistan Claims 23 Killed in Afghanistan Chaman Border Strikes
read more