The Torkham border crossing has been closed for five days, causing significant problems for travelers and traders on both sides of the border. This closure has disrupted normal movement and trade, creating a severe bottleneck for businesses and individuals relying on this route.
According to local sources, the closure on Wednesday, February 26, was due to the construction of a Taliban checkpoint and facilities near the border. The Pakistani border forces took this action in response to the security concerns posed by these developments on the Afghanistan side.
Pakistani media have reported that the closure of the Torkham crossing is resulting in daily losses of approximately $3 million for traders on both sides. The ongoing shutdown is having a detrimental effect on trade and travel, exacerbating the economic difficulties for people in the region.
So far, the Taliban has not taken any action to resolve the issue or reopen the crossing. Despite the growing concerns, the group has remained silent on the matter, leaving the situation unresolved for now.
Pakistan has not yet officially commented on the closure or provided a statement on how long it expects the situation to last. The tension remains high as the blockage continues, impacting both the local economy and daily life.
The Torkham border has been closed before due to border tensions. In August 2024, the crossing was shut down after clashes between Pakistani forces and the Taliban over road construction near the border. Similar closures have occurred at other crossings like Ghulam Khan and Kharlachi following military confrontations.
Despite ongoing talks between Taliban officials in Nangarhar and Pakistani authorities, no resolution has been reached. Pakistan has requested the Taliban halt construction near the border, but the Taliban have refused. As the closure continues, hundreds of trucks with essential goods are stranded, raising concerns about price hikes and shortages in Afghanistan.
Torkham Border closure: Fifth day of $3 million losses and disrupting trade and travel
A former Afghan intelligence officer, who had worked with U.S. forces for 13 years, was arrested due to the new immigration policies under the Trump administration. Upon visiting the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office for his annual check-in, he was informed that his temporary residency permit had been revoked.
The officer’s situation is a direct result of the immigration policy changes implemented after Trump’s return to the White House in January 2025. These new regulations have significantly impacted the cases of Afghan refugees and asylum seekers.
As part of the policy shift, Trump issued an executive order suspending the resettlement program for Afghan refugees, including halting all flights for eligible Afghans seeking resettlement in the United States. Furthermore, reports indicate that the Trump administration closed the U.S. State Department office responsible for resettling refugees who had worked with U.S. forces.
These changes have caused significant concern among Afghan refugees and other migrants who are seeking the safest way to settle in the U.S. Many individuals, including this officer, who had collaborated with U.S. forces, are now facing serious challenges regarding their immigration status.
The Trump administration’s refugee and resettlement policies have created considerable uncertainty for those who worked alongside U.S. forces, including Afghan nationals who assisted with intelligence and military operations. These individuals, who had been promised protection, now face the risk of deportation or detention under the new regulations.
The suspension of the refugee resettlement program has left many individuals stranded, unsure of their future and safety. With limited avenues for legal recourse, they find themselves in precarious situations as they navigate the shifting policies.
The actions of the Trump administration have sparked widespread criticism, especially from advocates for refugees and human rights organizations. Many argue that these policies betray the promises made to those who risked their lives working with U.S. forces and jeopardize their safety and well-being.
Former Afghan Intelligence Officer arrested amid US Immigration Crackdown
The foreign ministers of Russia and Iran said in Tehran on Tuesday that developments in Afghanistan are of particular interest to both countries.
After discussions between the foreign ministers of Russia and Iran regarding Afghanistan, the Islamic Emirate has described its relations with these two countries as positive and expressed hope that these ties will further expand.
Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate, stated: “The Islamic Emirate has good relations with both Russia and Iran and appreciates their good intentions regarding Afghanistan. Especially in economic and political matters, we have witnessed significant progress with them, and we hope these relations will grow further.”
The foreign ministers of Russia and Iran said in Tehran on Tuesday that developments in Afghanistan are of particular interest to both countries and that they will continue their consultations on the issue.
Sergey Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister, stressed in a joint press conference with Abbas Araghchi, Iranian foreign minister, that their discussions focused on regional issues, particularly Afghanistan. According to Lavrov, Moscow addresses Afghanistan-related matters through neighboring countries and within the framework of the “Moscow Format.”
Lavrov stated: “I already mentioned the successful holding of the Economic Forum in January here in Iran and our cooperation on Afghanistan, where we interact in various formats, including the Moscow format, meetings of Afghanistan’s neighboring countries, and the Quadrilateral group of China, Iran, Russia, and Pakistan.”
The Russian foreign minister stressed that Afghanistan should not be forgotten and that Moscow, in collaboration with Afghanistan’s neighboring countries, pays special attention to resolving the country’s issues.
Seyed Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, also noted that developments in Afghanistan have always been of interest to both Tehran and Moscow and that the two countries will continue their consultations in this regard.
The Iranian foreign minister stated: “Afghanistan’s developments are important to us and Russia. Our discussions on this matter have always continued, and we intend to consult even more on this issue.”
“Overall, we should maintain balanced relations with the West to avoid being dragged into a Cold War, as Afghanistan suffered significant damage in the 1980s and 1990s,” said Moeen Gul Samkanai, a political analyst.
Previously, Russia’s foreign minister had also stated that the United States seeks to maintain its influence in Afghanistan and is using neighboring countries to achieve this objective.
Islamic Emirate: ‘Good Intentions’ of Russia, Iran Appreciated
A British couple were arrested in Afghanistan due to a “misunderstanding” that they had fake Afghan passports, the Taliban said on Tuesday.
Peter and Barbie Reynolds, 79 and 75, were detained by the Taliban’s interior ministry on 1 February while returning to their home in the central province of Bamiyan.
The couple, who run education and training programmes in Afghanistan, were arrested along with Faye Hall, a Chinese-American friend and an interpreter from their business.
Taliban spokesperson Abdul Mateen Qani said the arrests were due to a “misunderstanding” that they possessed fake Afghan passports.
On Monday, the Reynolds’ daughter, Sarah Entwistle, said the family had initially chosen not to involve the UK authorities “hoping to hear directly from the Taliban about why they’d arrested our parents”.
“Our parents have always sought to honour the Taliban, so we wanted to give them the opportunity to explain their reasons for this detention. However, after more than three weeks of silence, we can no longer wait,” Entwistle told Times Radio.
“We’re now urgently calling on the British consulate to do everything in their power to get us answers and to put as much pressure as they can on the Taliban for their release.”
On Monday, Qani said the Taliban would attempt to release the couple “as soon as possible”, the BBC reported.
He said: “A series of considerations is being taken into account and, after evaluation, we will endeavour to release them as soon as possible.”
The UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said it was “supporting the family of two British nationals who are detained in Afghanistan”.
The couple married in Kabul more than 50 years ago and run Rebuild, “an Afghan-registered research and training business” that has been operating since 2009.
In an open letter to the Taliban, Entwistle and her three brothers said: “We do not understand the reasons behind their arrest. Our parents have consistently expressed their commitment to Afghanistan, stating that they would rather sacrifice their lives than become part of ransom negotiations or be traded.”
Taliban says ‘misunderstanding’ led to arrest of British couple in Afghanistan
German media reported that a group of 155 Afghan local staff members who worked for the German government were transferred from Islamabad to Berlin on Tuesday. According to Bild newspaper, another group of Afghan refugees is expected to be transferred from Islamabad to Germany next month.
The group flew from Islamabad to Berlin on Tuesday, February 25, with a stopover in Dubai. Bild reported that there are no direct flights from Afghanistan to Germany, and the next flight from Pakistan to Germany is planned for March.
Some of those transferred to Berlin had worked for the German government before the German forces left Afghanistan in 2021. These individuals were part of the local staff employed by the German government in Afghanistan.
The Bild newspaper also noted that the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Christian Social Union (CSU) have criticized these flights. German politician Thorsten Frei warned that the federal government is bringing in people from Afghanistan instead of focusing on deporting Afghan criminals.
Reports indicate that Germany has accepted over 48,000 Afghans since the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban. Of these, 38,000 are individuals identified as “at risk” by the German government.
The Christian Democratic Union (CDU), led by Friedrich Merz, won the recent German elections, with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) making significant gains.
The AfD’s rise has sparked concerns among migrants about potential changes in immigration policies. The transfer of Afghan refugees to Germany continues, reflecting the country’s ongoing commitment to those at risk in Afghanistan.
However, with the AfD’s increased influence, the issue of immigration and refugee policies is becoming more contentious. Election outcomes could shape future policies, balancing humanitarian efforts with concerns over security and immigration control, potentially impacting Germany’s domestic and international stance on refugees.
Around 3,000 Afghans with German admission permits are currently waiting in Islamabad for their transfer to Berlin. This ongoing refugee process continues to be a significant issue in Germany’s foreign policy and immigration strategy. The government’s approach has sparked debate over the consistency of its policies regarding Afghan refugees.
155 Afghan staff transferred from Pakistan to Germany, another group expected next month
John Sopko, the former Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), stated at the Herat Security Conference in Madrid on Tuesday that the United States has spent over $21 billion on Afghanistan since the Taliban’s return to power. He highlighted that, despite a reduction in foreign aid, the U.S. continues to send money to Afghanistan on a weekly basis.
Sopko, who previously headed SIGAR, mentioned that a significant portion of this funding had been directed towards humanitarian aid, refugee relocation, and the repayment of Afghanistan’s foreign assets. According to SIGAR’s report from August, 2021, Washington had provided around $21 billion in assistance with $3.7 billion allocated specifically for humanitarian purposes.
Despite the U.S. government’s stance on cutting aid, Sopko argued that if the Taliban does not change its policies on women’s rights, education, and human rights, the U.S. believes that these funds should be halted. He also proposed that $4 billion from Afghanistan’s Swiss escrow fund should be used as compensation for victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks.
He added, “The humanitarian aid provided to Afghanistan has had no real impact on the Taliban’s views on women, children, education, and human rights.”
SIGAR’s report further breaks down that from the $20.7 billion allocated between August 2021 and June 2024, $2.97 billion went towards humanitarian and development assistance. These funds were spent across various sectors, including humanitarian aid, development projects, organizational operations, and security.
Sopko also raised concerns that a significant portion of U.S. aid has reached the Taliban, as there was insufficient oversight regarding how the funds were used. He noted that previous U.S. military and diplomatic personnel often provided misleading reports to enhance their careers, leading to a lack of accountability. According to Sopko, much of the assistance was funneled through organizations like the UN and the World Food Program, but the monitoring process was not robust enough to ensure it was used effectively.
Sopko’s remarks reflect the ongoing challenges in Afghanistan, highlighting issues with U.S. financial aid and the lack of transparency in its use. His comments underscore a growing sense of frustration within the U.S. about its involvement in Afghanistan and the lack of tangible outcomes from its extensive investments. Moving forward, as U.S. priorities shift under a new administration, the future of American aid to Afghanistan remains uncertain.
US continues weekly payments to Afghanistan, says Sopko
Political analysts also stress that to prevent border issues, Iran and Pakistan must create opportunities for the voluntary return of Afghan refugees.
The UNHCR representative in Afghanistan has called on Iran and Pakistan not to undermine their decades-long history of hosting Afghan refugees by expelling them.
Emphasizing proper treatment, voluntary return, and cooperation between the two countries and the United Nations, Arafat Jamal told TOLOnews that if coordination is not ensured, chaos will arise in the region.
He said: “We should be able to set with those countries and with Afghanistan to make sure that they come home in a systematic manner and in a manner that contributes to stability, to economic growth and to peace inside Afghanistan, this is our appeal. Treat people with dignity, make sure that those who want to go home are doing so voluntarily and work with us so that the movement is organized and contributes to stability. If not, we will have a situation of chaos on both sides of the border, and nobody wants that.”
Political analysts also stress that to prevent border issues, Iran and Pakistan must create opportunities for the voluntary return of Afghan refugees.
“If this process is not halted or a proper framework is not established to ensure the dignified return of Afghans, historical grievances between Afghanistan and these two countries will deepen and could even lead to conflict,” said Zakiullah Muhammadi, a university professor.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation reported that 14,000 Afghans have returned from Iran, Pakistan, and Turkey the month of Dalwa (solar calender).
Abdul Matlub Haqqani, the ministry’s spokesperson, said: “The total number of returnees stands at 14,140, including 10,683 from Iran, 3,311 from Pakistan, and 146 from Turkey.”
Arafat Jamal also stated during an event in Kabul yesterday (Monday, February 24) that over 2.1 million Afghan refugees returned to Afghanistan last year.
Iran, Pakistan Deportations May Harm Legacy of Hospitality
According to Abdul Mateen Qane, these individuals were arrested for “specific reasons,” and efforts are ongoing to resolve their cases.
The Ministry of Interior has confirmed to TOLOnews that three foreign nationals and their Afghan interpreter have been arrested in the country.
Abdul Mateen Qane, the spokesperson for the Ministry of Interior, told TOLOnews that the detainees include two British citizens who hold Afghan identification documents, an American of Chinese origin, and their translator.
According to Abdul Mateen Qane, these individuals were arrested for “specific reasons,” and efforts are ongoing to resolve their cases.
The spokesperson further stated: “Regarding the arrest of foreign nationals, two of them are British citizens with Afghan ID cards and passports, one is an American of Chinese origin, and a translator has also been detained for certain considerations.”
Some experts believe that host countries have the right to detain foreign individuals if they violate local laws.
Zalmai Afghan Yar, a military affairs analyst, told TOLOnews: “Any foreign citizen traveling to Afghanistan who acts against governance policies will naturally be detained. I hope countries will not engage in confrontation over the enforcement of policies and will resolve these matters diplomatically. If they are guilty, they should be punished, and if not, they should be released.”
Previously, a former Canadian soldier accused of violating Afghanistan’s law was arrested who was then released following Qatar’s mediation.
Three Foreign Nationals and a Local Interpreter Arrested: MoI
Islamabad — Afghanistan’s radical Taliban leaders on Thursday rejected the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over their country, declaring as ‘unlawful’ the decision in 2003 by their predecessors to join the Hague-based court’s founding treaty.
The decision follows the ICC chief prosecutor’s announcement last month, seeking arrest warrants for the reclusive Taliban supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, and a close associate, accusing them both of being “criminally responsible for persecuting Afghan girls and women.”
The Taliban militarily regained power in August 2021, succeeding the internationally recognized government in Kabul, which collapsed alongside the withdrawal of U.S.-led NATO troops after nearly two decades in Afghanistan.
The Taliban, now governing as the Islamic Emirate, have imposed their strict interpretation of Islamic law, known as Sharia, placing sweeping restrictions on freedom of speech and women’s access to education and public roles in society.
No country has recognized the Taliban as a legitimate government primarily over their harsh treatment of Afghan women and girls.
“As an entity that upholds the religious and national values of the Afghan people within the framework of Islamic Sharia, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan does not recognize any obligation to the Rome Statute or the institution referred to as the ‘International Criminal Court,’” the Taliban stated in an English-language declaration.
It accused the ICC of political bias and failing to take any “substantive measures against the war crimes perpetrated in Afghanistan by occupying forces and their allies.”
“Given that many of the world’s major powers are not signatories to this ‘court,’ it is unwarranted for a nation such as Afghanistan, which has historically endured foreign occupation and colonial subjugation, to be bound by its jurisdiction,” the Taliban asserted.
In October 2001, Western forces led by the U.S. invaded Afghanistan, overthrowing the then-Taliban government for sheltering al-Qaida leaders held responsible for the terrorist attacks in the United States that occurred in September of that year.
In February 2003, the Washington-backed successive government in Kabul formally deposited its instrument of accession to the Rome Statute, which founded the ICC, thereby granting the court jurisdiction over crimes committed within its territory or by Afghan nationals.
“In light of the aforementioned considerations, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan formally asserts that it does not recognize any legal obligation under the Rome Statute and deems the previous administration’s accession to this statute to be devoid of legal validity,” said Thursday’s Taliban statement.
Karim Khan, the ICC prosecutor, stated in his January 23 announcement that his decision to seek arrest warrants for Akhundzada and Taliban chief justice, Abdul Hakim Haqqani, was based on a thorough investigation and evidence collected into their alleged crimes against humanity.
The ICC is mandated to rule on the world’s worst offenses, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The court has no police force and relies on 125 member states to execute its arrest warrants.
Akhundzada seldom leaves his office in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar and rules the country through religious decrees. He has banned girls’ education beyond the sixth grade and prohibited women from most public as well as private sector employment, among other restrictions on their rights.
In a speech he delivered in Kandahar last week, the Taliban chief again dismissed criticism of his governance, asserting that it was rooted in divine commands. A government spokesperson quoted Akhundzada as stating that “every decree he issues is based on consultation with scholars and derived from the Quran and Hadith [sayings of Islam’s prophet] and represents commands of Allah.”
Taliban withdraw Afghanistan from International Criminal Courts
After the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) banned opium poppy cultivation in April 2022, there was a movement of some farmers from southern Afghanistan into neighbouring regions of Pakistan to grow poppy there. The same migration to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces followed the first Taliban ban on opium in 2000-01. AAN’s Jelena Bjelica, together with Nur Khan Himmat, have been hearing from Afghans currently living in Duki, Kila Saifullah and Kila Abdullah districts of Balochistan about their decision to take their expertise in opium cultivation to Pakistan. In candid conversations, the farmers spoke of dangerous journeys, bribes and spiralling land prices, as well as discovering that the soil in Balochistan was of variable quality and water scarce. They also spoke of their hopes that the harvest in late April would be good and they can send much needed money back to their families in Afghanistan.Thousands of Afghans have moved to Balochistan to grow poppy. From our district alone, one in every two men from each household has come here to grow poppy, either as sharecroppers or after renting land themselves.For farmers, it is clear that no crop can rival the financial returns of opium. So when in April 2022, the Islamic Emirate banned opium poppy cultivation, the migration of many southern farmers to Pakistan was, perhaps, no surprise. A quarter of a century ago, following the Emirate’s ban on growing poppy in 2000, Afghan farmers also moved to Pakistani Balochistan and what is now called Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
This time, the Emirate did give farmers a grace period after announcing the ban: it allowed them to harvest the crop already in the ground. After that, though, the ban has been strictly enforced and cultivation has been virtually eliminated cultivation across most of the country (AAN). According to UNODC’s 2023 Opium Survey, the national harvest fell from 6,200 tons of fresh opium in 2022 to just 33 tons in 2023. UNODC also reported that Helmand province – responsible for over half of the total national area under poppy in 2022 – and Kandahar province – responsible for a third – recorded drops of 99.99 per cent and 88.84 per cent respectively in the area of land under poppy in 2023. Helmand is particularly important, not just as the epicentre of Afghanistan’s opium cultivation, but also of its trade; it borders Balochistan, through which part of Afghan opiates are smuggled out to Africa and Europe (AAN).
This report focuses on three farmers, two from Helmand and one from Kandahar, who have relocated to Balochistan since the ban, but first gives a little background to poppy cultivation across the Durand Line.
A brief overview of poppy cultivation in Balochistan
Opium cultivation in Pakistan was on the decline throughout the 1990s – from approximately 9,441 hectares in 1992 to just 213 hectares in 2001, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime’s (UNODC) 2008 report on illicit drug trends in Pakistan. However, UNODC also found that the high opium prices resulting from the Taliban’s 2000/01 opium ban in Afghanistan triggered a re-emergence of poppy cultivation in Pakistan. In 2003, the land under poppy in Pakistan expanded to 6,703 hectares and, for the first time, poppy was grown in Balochistan.[1] For a few years, the province expanded its drug-related activities from traditional smuggling to poppy cultivation as well, before again declining (from 3,067 ha in 2004 to only 424 ha in 2007).[2]
In the years that followed, sporadic media reports – for example, in 2014, from Voice of America (VoA), – suggested that some opium poppy cultivation had returned to Balochistan province, enabled by the lawlessness associated with years of separatist insurgency and brutal counter-insurgency.[3] However, nothing more substantive ensued, until that is, the IEA banned opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan in 2022.
As it did in the early 2000s, the 2022 opium ban left all but the largest farmers, who had stocks of opium paste to sell, very much the poorer and with few prospects of earning a living, while at the same time, causing an unprecedented hike in opium prices[4] (see AAN reports here and here). These have been the push factors driving some farmers to move to Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces, where the state, should it wish, has little control over the vast lands, and landowners are willing to rent out land for opium cultivation.
UNDOC, in its most recent report from November 2024,[5] recorded that “member states in the region have noted rising poppy cultivation.” It gave the example of Pakistan where the government reported that opium poppy cultivation had risen from 27 hectares in 2020 to 380 in 2023.[6] The authors’ contacts in Balochistan also said opium poppy had re-emerged in several districts, but also that the Pakistani government had not, so far, put any effort into stopping the cultivation.
In this report, the authors present information gathered from interviews with three farmers currently living in three different districts of Balochistan province (see the map below). The questionnaire contained four sets of questions. The first dealt with why, how and when farmers decided to shift their expertise to the Balochistan province. The second dealt with soil quality and availability of water in Balochistan, as compared to southern Afghanistan, and to the cost of renting land. The third set of questions was about the market for opium in Balochistan and the final set concerned the farmers’ encounters with the Pakistani authorities.
An edited Wikicommons map showing the districts that Afghan farmers told AAN they were growing poppy in. Map edit: Zolt Kovac for AAN
Why, when and how did the Afghan opium farmers move to Balochistan?
All three of our interviewees said they went to Pakistan alone, leaving their families behind in Afghanistan. They said this had made it easier to cross the border illegally. Two of our interviewees were sharecroppers – they get a share of the harvest or a portion of the land to farm in return for their labour on the whole. The third was a manager with opium-growing expertise: he was renting land and managing a project with three other men who were its financial backers and who also organised the dispatch of poppy farmers to work the land as sharecroppers.
One of the interviewees from Helmand who is currently living in the Kila Abdullah district of Balochistan, having moved to Pakistan a year and a half ago, is one of the two sharecroppers. His share is one quarter of the harvest. The rest goes to the man who rents the land, who is also covering all our interviewee’s expenses in Pakistan, including food. However, the interviewee will have to pay him back out of his share of the harvest. As to the interviewee’s reason for migrating and how he manages the back and forth between Afghanistan and Pakistan, he said:
There were no jobs in Helmand, so I decided to come to Balochistan and grow poppy here. I came with three friends. We go back home one at a time – sometimes one of us goes for a few days and the other two stay and await their turn. All of us are here without our families. … There are many Afghans who came to Balochistan. Just in Gulistan [an area of Kila Abdullah district], there are hundreds of Afghans who grow poppy, but none of them have brought their families with them.
The other sharecropper, who is also from Helmand, is now based in Duki district in Balochistan.
I came here around six months ago because there were no jobs in Helmand. I came without my family. There was no chance of bringing them along because the official ways of travel are blocked by the Pakistani government and the smuggling routes are very risky and very expensive.
All official border crossings between Afghanistan and Pakistan in the south were closed to travellers without documents almost immediately after the Taliban takeover in 2021. However, Afghans have continued crossing the border illegally, using smuggling routes. This always comes with some level of risk. Many use the illegal crossings between Baramcha district in Helmand and Nushki district in Balochistan for which smugglers, who drive them over the border, charge 30,000-35,000 Pakistani rupees (110-125 US dollars) per person. Onwards from Nushki district, our interviewees said, until you reach your destination, you must pay bribes to Pakistani police at check posts along the road. The size of the bribe depends on the sympathy of the policeman, as well as the guile of the traveller. As these routes are hard, risky, and expensive to use, the farmers typically travel in groups with their compatriots. “We are thirteen Afghans, including me” said our interviewee in Duki district, “all here to grow poppy. We’re all from the same village and came without our families. There are hundreds of people [Afghans] here, all from the south.” He farms land that was leased to a middle man who comes his district:
[The middle man] brought us all here to grow poppies as sharecroppers. … Our share is one fifth of the harvest. He pays our living expenses in Pakistan, but we’ll have to pay him back after the harvest. He also paid for the rent of a vehicle [ie the smuggler] from Helmand to here. But we don’t have to pay him back for that.
After the opium ban was imposed, many farmers did try to switch to licit crops, such as wheat, cotton, barley and maize. However, as AAN reported in March 2024, many who did so fell into poverty. That had been the case for our Kandahari (non-sharecopping) interviewee:
When the ban was imposed, I switched to growing wheat and other crops but didn’t get a good harvest. That’s why I decided to come to Balochistan. I moved my opium cultivation here around seven months ago. I came alone because travelling with the whole family on illegal routes is very risky.
He explained how his management of land in Kila Saifullah was working out.
I have three partners. They gave me money and told me to go and rent the land and I organised that myself. They then sent me farmers from Kandahar to grow poppy here. I’m an equal partner with the ones who put money in. They also pay [the smugglers] for transport from Kandahar to where we grow the poppy. They pay the expenses for all the farmers who work on our fields… until the last day of farming. These farmers will then have to repay all the money we’ve given them once the opium is sold.
He said that most of the men who rent out large tracts of land are “those who were opium smugglers and traders in the south in the past.” They have a lot of money, he said, and it is they who “arrange for the farmers to move to Balochistan and grow poppy.” Opium trade and smuggling was such a lucrative business, especially in the south, that it is not surprising that those who made their fortunes from it have found ways to keep it alive by relocating it to Pakistan. It is also not surprising that those who have capital have found ways to take the lion’s share of any profits while others labour.
About the people, land and climate in Balochistan
There is a similarity in the traditions and languages in Balochistan that help southern farmers integrate easily into local communities. Climate and land-wise, there are also many similarities. The weather in two of the districts that our three interviewees migrated to, Kila Saifullah and Kila Abdullah, is a little cooler than that of Helmand and Kandahar. Both are in the far north of Balochistan. Duki, the third district, is slightly to the south and is said to be a little hotter than Kandahar and Helmand.
Our interviewee in Duki, who is awaiting to see what yield he gets from his first harvest, due in April, is anxious, worried that it will not be that great, despite having been told that poppy would yield more there than in Helmand and Kandahar.
This land isn’t very good; it doesn’t grow poppy very well, although people say there’s more sap here than in Helmand. I heard that some people’s land grew bad poppies and they abandoned the land and went back to Afghanistan. Also, some people rented out land which didn’t have water. They dug wells but the wells didn’t have water in them. Unfortunately, they spent a lot of money and, in the end, got nothing back. However, I also know many people who got good returns from what they sowed.
According to our interviewees, the poppy yields in the two other districts are better. The manager from Kandahar who is renting out land in Kila Saifullah is hopeful. “This is our first year growing poppy in this district,” he said. “So far, we haven’t had a harvest, but the crop’s looking very good, so we hope to get a good yield. I’m satisfied with the quality. In terms of poppy production, the land is even better than our land in Kandahar.”
The sharecropper in Kila Abdullah district is cultivating poppies for the second year. He was very proud of his first harvest which yielded 56 kilograms of opium from 5 hectares of land. The harvest was so good he decided to sow poppy on 15 hectares this year: “We’re satisfied with the product. The land yields good poppies. Dew falls at night. The poppies from land where dew falls are more expensive than those from where it doesn’t. But, the land isn’t the same quality as Helmand’s. It’s more fertile there.”
Like Helmand and Kandahar, Balochistan suffers from a lack of water. Our interviewee in the Duki district told us about where he cultivates:
The land came with water, but it didn’t have solar panels or city power to draw the water up. [The middle man who leased the land] bought solar panels and now we can pump the water up and into the fields using solar power. It’s a six-month contract and when the contract ends, the land leaser will have to leave the solar panels for the landowner. The land was leased for 4,000,000 Pakistani rupees (14,300 USD).
Our Kandahari interviewee first had to get wells dug on the 150 jeribs (30 hectares) of land in Kila Saifullah that he had rented for 2,000,000 Pakistani rupees (7,200 USD):
The water table’s very high. I dug the wells around three to five metres deep. Because we’re next to the river, sometimes we can irrigate our crops with river water. Previously, the owners of the land did that, but the river only flows sometimes, in spring or summer, but in winter, it runs dry. So, I dug wells and installed solar panels on the land. When I go, I’ll leave the solar panels to the landowner. It’s in the contract with him.
The interviewee in Kila Abdullah said his 18 hectares of rented land had come with wells:
There are two tube wells on this land and from each, we can pump three inches of water a day. We use city power for the three hours a day it’s on, and otherwise the solar panels installed on the well. The city power and solar panels belong to the landowner. … We’re four farmers and, together, we sowed 15 hectares of land. The total land rented out is 18 hectares. There isn’t much water in this area.
Rents have soared since the Emirate ban drew Afghan farmers to Balochistan. For example, the sharecropping farmer who has grown poppy in Kila Abdullah district for the last two years told AAN the rent had increased by almost twentyfold: “Last year, the leaser paid 70,000 Pakistani rupees (250 USD) for this land, but this year, he rented the same land for 1,300,000 Pakistani rupees (4,650 USD).” Our interviewee in Duki district also said land that used to rent out for 100,000 Pakistani rupees (360 USD) now costs 800,000 Pakistani rupees (2,860 USD). This meant, he said, that farmers were resorting to renting less fertile, more marginal lands:
In this area, prices have skyrocketed. Now, people are renting land that needs more work to make it ready for cultivation. Land that comes with water and is ready for sowing is too expensive for most people. The rent for unprepared land has also increased, but not by as much. Farmers renting it have to plough it, dig boreholes and install solar panels to make it ready to grow poppy.
The interviewee in Kila Saifullah district, who had planted 30 hectares with poppy, said land was in such high demand that it was impossible to find these days.
Poppy markets in Balochistan
Opium is openly bought and sold in a market in Gulistan town, located in Kila Abdullah district. Gulistan is near the border with the Spin Boldak district of Kandahar, approximately 70 kilometres northwest of Quetta. Although Afghan farmers cannot use banks to transfer their earnings, they can easily send money back home through the hawala system after selling their harvest. The poppy farmer in the Kila Abdullah district remarked that selling opium paste was very straightforward: “I sold my opium here in the town last year and will sell this year’s harvest here when it comes again.”
Balochistan is at the intersection of smuggling routes between Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan. Our interviewees did not know which smuggling route the traders use, but expect they will come to their fields to purchase opium directly from them, as they do in Afghanistan. The Kandahari manager currently in Kila Saifullah said:
So far, we haven’t harvested. This is my first year cultivating poppies here. I still don’t know whether I’ll sell it here or take it to Gulistan. It’s is sold freely in the market there. When I get the harvest in, my partners and I will decide how to manage it. But I think that some smugglers and traders will come by our fields and buy the opium directly from us.
The farmer in Duki district, which is further away from Gulistan town, said the same: “People say that at harvest season, traders will come by our fields and buy the opium. Nobody takes it back home. We also plan to sell it here. There’s no difference in opium prices between here and Helmand.”
Following a major hike in prices in 2022 and 2023, opium prices stabilised at around 730 US dollars in the first half of 2024, UNODC has reported.[7] These prices are still several times higher than the long-running, pre-ban average of 100 US dollars per kilogram of opium (see this AAN report). That suggests that the opening up of cultivation in Balochistan has not yet made a substantial impact on the amounts of opium available at the markets to affect the price.
How do the Pakistani authorities deal with poppy farmers?
Our interviewees said that Pakistani government officials do not interfere with poppy cultivation, but instead, try to extract bribes from the farmers. “So far, we’ve not received any threats from the government,” said the manager in Kila Saifullah district. “Sometimes [officials] go to [look at] the crops of some people and ask for money, but I don’t know how much they want. I heard they took bribes from people last year as well.” The same interviewee painted a picture of an overt system of bribery:
The local government recently asked the big land leasers and the [Pakistani] community elders to meet government officials and made it clear how much money they [government officials] expect from them. The community elder informed us of this. Now they’ll be sitting with the government officials and will pay the bribe and then we’ll have to pay our share as well.
The farmer in Duki district, who was growing poppy there for the first year, relayed what he had heard from local people:
According to people from this area or the people who’ve been cultivating poppy here, the government takes bribes from people every year. They say the government usually comes and ask for bribes before the harvest. The bribe is negotiated. They take between 200,000 and 500,000 Pakistani rupees [720-1,790 USD for each tube well, depending on the size of area of land on which the poppy has been cultivated.
AAN’s interviewee in Kila Abdullah said he was not troubled by the bribery, which is dealt with by the leaseholders and landowners:
It’s not a threat. Last year, the government didn’t ask us. The leasers and the landowners talked to them and paid some bribes, I don’t know how much. It seems that in Kila Abdullah district, the government allows the farmers to cultivate poppy. However, during the harvest, they ask for some bribes and that would be negotiable and won’t be very much.
Farming poppy in Balochistan – at any cost
For those concerned about illegal opiates, the shift in cultivation to Balochistan undermines whatever gains have been made in Afghanistan. Moreover, it seems that production is still ultimately controlled by the big traders who, up to now, have been little affected by the ban on cultivation, given that reports indicate that the ban on trading and export has been only lightly enforced.[8] For poor farmers and the landless, who used to get cash work in the opium fields, the ban has been a calamity. Those with power and capital are often actually better off because of it and have been able to pivot opium production and their control of it from southern Afghanistan to Pakistan.
As to those poor farmers, the last three years have been devastating. After the Taliban takeover, the Afghan economy shrank by about a fifth (World Bank), as civilian aid and foreign military spending and support vanished overnight, although aid was to return. It is estimated to have recovered only about ten percent of what it lost.[9] A similar shock to the economy is likely to be felt in the wake of the 20 January executive order by United States president Donald Trump to halt US aid. For an analysis of the likely shockwaves to the economy, see AAN’s Kate Clark’s excellent report ‘Stop Work!’ Aid and the Afghan economy after the halt to US aid.[10] For men like our interviewees, the Emirate’s ban on growing poppy was catastrophic, given the lack of alternative sources of income in Afghanistan, given its stagnant economy. Balochistan has been an alternative. Like many Afghans, they were ready to face perilous journeys, bribery and the upheaval of migration in order to support their families back home. The terms of their deals with those renting the land are poor, but, without capital, they have few choices and no bargaining power.
Their stories also reveal, once again, the irresistible allure of opium poppy cultivation. Given the spiralling prices of renting even marginal land in Balochistan, which makes for uncertain yields, they have no guarantee that their sacrifices will be worth the cost. However, they seem to believe that all the risks associated with migration to Balochistan are still preferable to all other options now available in their home country.
Edited by Rachel Reid and Kate Clark
References
References
↑1
UNODC said in its 2008 report:
Of the 6,703 ha cultivated in Pakistan in 2003, 38 percent (2,521 ha) was harvested. In 2004 with a similar level of cultivation (6,694 ha), only 22 percent (1,481 ha) was harvested. Although total reported cultivation in 2005 dropped by 47 percent (to 3,145 ha), 75 percent (2,359 ha) was harvested – mostly in the Khyber Agency. In 2006, cultivation dropped by 61 percent (to 1,909 ha), most of which was in NWFP and FATA [Northwestern Frontier Province and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, renamed as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2010].
In Balochistan, “the entire 2005 poppy crop and almost the entire poppy crop in 2007 were destroyed,” UNODC said. According to The New Humanitarian from 2003, “the Pakistani authorities have destroyed some 500 acres of poppy fields in the southwestern province of Balochistan, on the border with Afghanistan, following a tip-off that there were some 1,500 acres under the crop.”
↑3
The unrest in Balochistan is between armed groups like the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Pakistan state and is seen, especially, in the provincial capital, Quetta, and in Baloch-populated areas. Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) also carries out sporadic attacks in the area.
↑4
After the first ban in 2001, opium prices increased from an average of 30 US dollars per kilogramme during the period 1997-2000 to an average of 300 US dollars per kilo in the period 2001-03. In 2003, prices peaked at 383 US dollars per kilo, stabilising at around 100 US dollars per kilo in following years.
Following the second ban in 2022, prices surged from an average of 100 US dollars per kilo in June 2021 to 1,112 USD per kilo in the south and 1,088 USD in the north by December 2023, after which they stabilised at 730 US dollars per kilo.
In 2023, reported UNODC, according to the Pakistani government, about 340 hectares were eradicated.
↑7
In December 2023, Afghan opiates expert David Mansfield reported they had reached as high as 1,112 USD per kilogramme in the south and 1,088 USD per kilogramme in Nangrahar (see this tweet).
The calculation that Afghanistan has made up only ten per cent of what it lost in 2021 was made in the World Bank’s December 2024 Afghanistan Development Update. It also estimated that it could take more than ten years for GDP to recover from the severe contraction suffered in 2021. That calculation was made before the Trump order to halt US aid and the outlook is now, undoubtedly worse.
↑10
According to the UN’s Financial Tracking Service, US funding had accounted for 43.9 per cent of total aid to Afghanistan in 2024. For 2025, the amount pledged by the US had been dwarfing contributions from other countries, making up 65 per cent of the total. The sums are so large that cutting them will have an effect on GDP, the value of the afghani (and so also of imports, including food, fuel and medicine), Afghanistan’s trade imbalance as well as on beneficiaries and those who have lost their jobs in the aid sector.
Migrating Poppy Cultivation: Afghan poppy farmers in Balochistan
The United Nations says aid workers are still in a “race against time” to remove rubble and rebuild after the devastating earthquake struck eastern Afghanistan last month, killing at least 2,200 people and cutting off remote areas.
The 6.0-magnitude quake on Aug. 31 was shallow, destroying or causing extensive damage to low-rise buildings in the mountainous region. It hit late at night, and homes — mostly made of mud, wood, or rocks — collapsed instantly, becoming death traps.
Satellite data shows that about 40,500 truckloads of debris still needs to be cleared from affected areas in several provinces, the United Nations Development Program said Wednesday. Entire communities have been upended and families are sleeping in the open, it added.
The quake’s epicenter was in remote and rugged Kunar province, challenging rescue and relief efforts by the Taliban government and humanitarian groups. Authorities deployed helicopters or airdropped army commandos to evacuate survivors. Aid workers walked for hours on foot to reach isolated communities.
“This is a race against time,” said Devanand Ramiah, from the UNDP’s Crisis Bureau. “Debris removal and reconstruction operations must start safely and swiftly.”
People’s main demands were the reconstruction of houses and water supplies, according to a spokesman for a Taliban government committee tasked with helping survivors, Zia ur Rahman Speenghar.
People were getting assistance in cash, food, tents, beds, and other necessities, Speenghar said Thursday. Three new roads were under construction in the Dewagal Valley, and roads would be built to areas where there previously were none.
“Various countries and organizations have offered assistance in the construction of houses but that takes time. After the second round of assistance, work will begin on the third round, which is considering what kind of houses can be built here,” the spokesman said.
Afghanistan is facing a “perfect storm” of crises, including natural disasters like the recent earthquake, said Roza Otunbayeva, who leads the U.N. mission to the country.
Afghanistan Peace Campaign
