‘What About Six Years of Friendship and Fighting Together?’

Later this week, the Trump administration may impose travel restrictions on citizens from dozens of countries, supposedly because of security concerns. According to early reports, one of the countries on the “red” list, from which all travel would be banned, is Afghanistan. Sixty thousand exhaustively vetted Afghan visa applicants and refugees, who risked their lives alongside the Americans in their country as interpreters, drivers, soldiers, judges, and journalists, and who now face imprisonment, torture, and death at the hands of the Taliban, will have the golden doors to the United States shut in their face.

As the Taliban closed in on Kabul in the summer of 2021, then-Senator Marco Rubio co-authored a letter to President Joe Biden urging him to “ensure the safety and security of Afghans who have worked closely” with American intelligence agencies: “Abandoning these individuals” would be “a stain on our national conscience.” After the Afghan government fell and tens of thousands of Afghans rushed to the Kabul airport, trying desperately to be evacuated with the last American troops, Rubio excoriated Biden for leaving Afghan allies behind to be killed. Then-Representative Mike Waltz warned that “our local allies are being hunted down.” Kash Patel accused the Biden administration of “the stranding of US personnel and allies.” The Republican majority of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, in a damning report on the fall of Afghanistan, said that Biden’s “abandonment of our Afghan allies, who fought alongside the U.S. military against the Taliban—their brothers in arms—is a stain on [his] administration.”

As for then-ex-President Donald Trump, he was incredulous, telling Sean Hannity on Fox News: “We take the military out before we took our civilians out, and before we took the interpreters and others we want to try and help? But by the way, I’m America first. The Americans come out first. But we’re also going to help people that helped us.”

On Inauguration Day, President Trump signed executive orders pausing foreign aid and refugee processing. He turned off the flow of money to private agencies that helped Afghans start new lives in America and shut down the State Department office set up under Biden to oversee their resettlement. Since then, the number of Afghans able to enter the U.S. has dwindled to zero. The travel ban will make the halt official and permanent. All of the outrage at the Biden administration’s betrayal of our Afghan allies from the very Republicans who now command U.S. foreign policy will go down as sheer opportunism. The stain will be on them.

“All these fucking people had a lot to say about what was going on in August 2021,” says Shawn VanDiver, a Navy veteran who leads AfghanEvac, a coalition of  organizations that help resettle Afghan allies in this country. Politically, Biden never recovered from the chaotic fall of Kabul and the terrible scenes at the airport, climaxing in the suicide bombing at Abbey Gate that killed 13 American service members and 170 Afghans. Biden deserved blame above all for failing to take seriously America’s obligation to vulnerable Afghans who had placed their trust in this country. But during the years following the debacle, AfghanEvac and other civil-society groups worked with the Biden administration to bring nearly 200,000 Afghans to America—a little-known fact that partly redeemed its failures. Now Trump is compounding Biden’s earlier sins, this time in cold blood.

VanDiver and his colleagues are scrambling to persuade their contacts inside the administration to exempt Afghans from the coming travel ban. Many of his military friends are stunned that the president they voted for is betraying Afghans they had to leave behind. “I wonder if President Trump knows that Stephen Miller is ruining his relationship with veterans because of what we’re doing to our Afghan allies,” he told me. According to VanDiver, Rubio and Waltz—now the secretary of state and the national security adviser, respectively—are sympathetic to the veterans’ appeal; but Miller, the hard-line homeland-security adviser, will have the final say with Trump.

Forty-five thousand Afghans have completed the onerous steps to qualify for Special Immigrant Visas as former employees of the U.S. government in Afghanistan and are ready to travel. Fifteen thousand more Afghans, most in Pakistan, have reached the end of refugee processing as close affiliates of the American war effort. They’ve been waiting through years of referrals, applications, interviews, medical exams, and security vetting. Some of them have plane tickets. Another 147,000 Afghans are well along in qualifying for Special Immigrant Visas.“We did make a promise as a nation to these people that if they stood beside the U.S. mission and worked with us, that they would have a pathway to come build lives here,” a State Department official, who requested anonymity because of a policy against speaking to journalists, told me. “If we don’t keep the promises we make to our wartime allies, then our standing globally should be questioned by any other future potential allies we might have.” Afghans who finally reach the United States, the official continued, “are so incredibly grateful to have the opportunity to be in this country. They believe in the promise of this country.”

One young Afghan couple—I’ll call them Farhad and Saman, because using their real names would expose them to danger—are both veterans of the Afghan special forces, and they spent years serving and fighting alongside U.S. Army Rangers and other special operators. After the American departure, they were hunted by Talibs and took shelter in safe houses around the country, while family members were harassed, arrested, and tortured. In 2023, with the help of a small group of American supporters, the couple crossed the border into Pakistan and found lodgings in Islamabad, where they waited with their small children for their refugee applications to be processed. Last summer they were interviewed by the U.S. embassy and passed their medical exams; but security screening took so long that, by the time it was completed, their medical exams had expired. On January 2 of this year, they passed their second medical exams and were told by the International Organization of Migration that they would soon depart for the United States. “But on January 24, we realized unfortunately that Donald Trump is in office and everything is stopped,” Farhad told me by phone. “It was at the very last minute, the last stage. I didn’t expect that this would happen. It made a very bad impact on me and my family.”

Recently, stepped-up Pakistani police patrols and raids made the couple flee Islamabad to another region. Their 3-year-old daughter and infant son don’t have visas, and Farhad’s and Saman’s visas expire on April 17, with no prospect of renewal. Fear of being stopped at a checkpoint keeps the family inside their small apartment almost all the time, while their daughter wonders when she’ll be able to start school. They ask neighbors to buy food for them at the bazaar. The Pakistani government has begun to issue warnings over loudspeakers at mosques that local people who rent property to Afghan refugees will face legal consequences. “I’m stressed that the U.S. government is not going to relocate us and will not help us to continue processing our case,” Farhad said. He has sent letters of inquiry to embassies of other countries, with no reply. “I’m worried that eventually somehow I’ll be deported to Afghanistan, and deportation means I’ll be caught by the Taliban and killed. My wife will not be excluded. She will face the same consequences. I’m overwhelmed sometimes when I think what will happen to my kids—they’ll be orphans. It’s too much for me to take in.”

When Republican leaders were shaming the Biden administration for abandoning this country’s Afghan allies, they sometimes used the military phrase brothers in arms. Now, as those same Republicans in the Trump administration are betraying the same Afghans all over again, Farhad used the phrase with me. “I fought like brothers in arms with the Americans in uniform for six years, shoulder to shoulder, everywhere,” he said. “If this travel ban happens, the question is, what about the six years of friendship and fighting together? What about helping your friends and allies? That’s the question I have.”

‘What About Six Years of Friendship and Fighting Together?’
read more

Afghan Migrants Face Uncertainty as Pakistan Upholds Deportation Deadline

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has once again emphasized that there will be no change in this deadline and that Afghans must leave Pakistani territory.

As the deadline set by the Pakistani government for the deportation of Afghan migrants approaches, concerns among these migrants in Pakistan have increased.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has once again emphasized that there will be no change in this deadline and that Afghans must leave Pakistani territory.

Previously, the UN refugee agency asked Pakistan to reconsider this decision; however, the spokesperson for Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry stated that Islamabad is not obligated to consult with the UNHCR regarding Afghan migrants.

Shafqat Ali Khan, the spokesperson for the ministry of foreign affairs of Pakistan, said: “We are not bound to consult UNHCR. First of all, Pakistan is not a member of the Refugee Convention. So, anything we have done for the Afghan refugees was done voluntarily for the past 50 years. So, with regards to international obligations, we have fulfilled more than our share, by offering this kind of hospitality to Afghans and we continue to welcome them. But they should have Pakistani visas on their passport, and then they will be more than welcome.”

“The Pakistani government should, in recognition of the hospitality it has extended over the past forty years, be able to invoke customary rights and understand Afghanistan’s conditions, and delay these deportations to a later time,” said Mohammad Khan Talebi Mohammadzai, a migrant rights activist.

As the deadline nears, concerns are growing about the arrest and forced deportation of Afghan migrants in Pakistan.

Many Afghan migrants have asked Pakistani authorities to grant them more time to leave the country.

“Ten days remain, but the treatment of Afghan migrants is not good, and the Pakistani government is putting pressure on them to leave the country within these ten days,” said Nazar Gul, an Afghan migrant in Pakistan.

“There is an economic crisis in Afghanistan. Both Afghans who returned in 2021 and 2022 and other citizens are unemployed, and there are no educational opportunities there,” said Malik Shinwari, another Afghan migrant in Pakistan.

Previously, Amir Khan Muttaqi, acting foreign minister, had asked Iran and Pakistan to treat Afghan migrants humanely and to avoid their forced deportation.

Afghan Migrants Face Uncertainty as Pakistan Upholds Deportation Deadline
read more

Torkham Crossing Remains Closed to Passengers Amid Technical Issues

Due to the ongoing closure, hundreds of passengers and patients remain stranded on both sides of the crossing.

Local officials in Nangarhar say that the Torkham crossing remains closed to passenger traffic today due to technical issues on the other side of the hypothetical Durand Line.

Two days ago, following an agreement between the two sides, the crossing was reopened for transit only, and it was scheduled to reopen for all types of movement today (Friday, March 21).

Sayed Tayeb Hamad, spokesperson for the Nangarhar Police Command, stated: “Torkham gate is currently open only for transit. According to the agreement, it was supposed to reopen today for passengers and patients as well. However, the equipment that had broken down on the Pakistani side has not yet been fully repaired. Work is ongoing, and once it’s fully restored, the crossing will be opened for passengers and patients.”

Due to the ongoing closure, hundreds of passengers and patients remain stranded on both sides of the crossing. They are calling for the immediate reopening of the crossing for regular travel.

Anis-ur-Rahman, one of the stranded passengers, said: “We were hoping the road would open today. Thousands of passengers and patients are waiting on both sides of the crossing. Due to the closure, they haven’t been able to return home. Our request is for this road to remain open permanently.”

Another passenger, Umair, said: “Pashtuns live on both sides of the crossing. It is only the hypothetical Durand Line that separates them. These people want to return to their homes for Eid.”

The Torkham crossing was closed nearly a month ago by Pakistani forces after Islamic Emirate forces on the Afghan side began constructing facilities near the hypothetical Durand Line.

Torkham Crossing Remains Closed to Passengers Amid Technical Issues
read more

US State Dept Calls Glezmann’s Release ‘Positive, Constructive Step’

In a statement, the department said that several other American citizens are still in detention in Afghanistan.

The US State Department has praised the release of George Glezmann by the Islamic Emirate, calling it a positive and constructive move.

In a statement, the department said that several other American citizens are still in detention in Afghanistan.

Glezmann’s release took place following a visit to Kabul by a US delegation led by US presidential envoy for hostage affairs Adam Boehler, and Zalmay Khalilzad, former US special envoy for Afghan peace.

According to a statement by Islamic Emirate’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the US delegation met with Amir Khan Muttaqi, acting foreign minister, and discussed bilateral relations between Kabul and Washington, the release of prisoners, and consular services for Afghans in the US.

Zia Ahmad Takal, head of public relations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said: “The foreign minister emphasized the importance of resolving issues through dialogue between Afghanistan and the United States. Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi also noted that both countries should move beyond the impact of the 20-year war and enter into political and economic dialogues.”

A few hours after this meeting, Zalmay Khalilzad wrote on his X account that George Glezmann, an American citizen, had been released by the Islamic Emirate after two and a half years in detention.

Khalilzad wrote: “Today is a good day. We succeeded in obtaining the release of an American citizen, George Glezmann, after two years in detention in Kabul. The Taliban government agreed to free him as a goodwill gesture to the President of the US and the American people.”

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Emirate also confirmed Glezmann’s release, emphasizing that the move was a humanitarian gesture.

The release was mediated by Qatar, and both Kabul and Washington acknowledged Qatar’s significant role in the process.

Regarding the American prisoner’s release, Zia Ahmad Takal said: “The Islamic Emirate today released an American detainee named George Glezmann from prison as a humanitarian action.”

The Islamic Emirate reiterated that all issues can be resolved through dialogue, understanding, and diplomacy.

Zalmay Khalilzad, former US envoy for Afghan peace, had signed the Doha Agreement with Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar in 2020.

Political analysts believe Khalilzad’s visit to Kabul may be aimed at shifting the previous US administration’s stance on Afghanistan toward a policy of engagement and cooperation with the Islamic Emirate.

“Zalmay Khalilzad, who brokered the agreement between the Islamic Emirate and the US, has now returned, raising speculation about the expansion of interactions between the Islamic Emirate and the US,” said Abdul Sadeq Hamidzoy, a political analyst.

George Glezmann, 65, is a mechanic with Delta Air Lines. He was arrested by the Islamic Emirate in December 2022 during a five-day visit to Kabul to learn about Afghanistan’s culture and history.

US State Dept Calls Glezmann’s Release ‘Positive, Constructive Step’
read more

Media Freedom in Afghanistan faces severe setbacks as repression of Journalists intensified in past year

In the past year, media freedom in Afghanistan has significantly worsened, with increased repression and challenges faced by journalists.

The media landscape and journalists’ status in Afghanistan have undergone significant changes in the past three years. Despite media freedom being a major achievement of the past two decades, many journalists still face challenges such as lack of access to information and economic struggles within the media industry.

The Afghanistan Journalists Center recently released a report on media freedom and journalists’ rights in 2024, highlighting a sharp 24% increase in media repression compared to the previous year. This indicates a growing clampdown on media freedoms.

According to the report, there were 172 cases of media rights violations over the past year. This included the shutdown of 22 media outlets due to new restrictions and the arrest of more than 50 journalists.

The report notes a division in the approach of the Taliban-led government towards media, with the Ministry of Information and Culture sidelined and the implementation of a new law on ” Virtue and the Prevention of Vice,” giving authorities extensive powers to control media activities.

A significant measure under the new law is the prohibition of live broadcasts, including interviews with local officials. This restriction, which initially started in Kandahar, was later extended to other provinces like Takhar, Badghis, Helmand, and Nangarhar by the end of the year.

In 2024, at least 17 new directives were issued to media outlets, a significant increase from just four in 2023. Journalists who defied these orders faced threats, imprisonment, or were banned from practicing journalism temporarily or permanently.

New restrictions included banning phone calls between female journalists and media outlets in some provinces, prohibiting live political programs, and banning critical or challenging content related to government policies.

Before the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the government had issued at least 15 media directives, including prohibitions on women in media, coverage of protests, and broadcasting international channels.

The Afghanistan Journalists Center recorded 172 violations of journalists’ rights over the past year, including 122 threats and 50 arrests, with at least five journalists sentenced to prison for periods ranging from two to five years.

Despite these challenges, the center expressed relief that no targeted attacks against media workers were reported in 2024, a contrast to the 168 violations recorded in the previous year, which included the killing of one journalist and the injury of 19 others.

The situation for female journalists has been especially difficult in Afghanistan over the past two years. With increasing discrimination and limited access to information, female reporters face higher hurdles compared to their male counterparts. These challenges have intensified after the reduction of foreign aid and the worsening economic situation within the media industry.

International bodies, such as the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), have called for increased protection of journalists’ rights globally, especially in conflict zones like Afghanistan. With the media sector facing severe repression, it is crucial to create legal frameworks and support systems that allow for the free flow of information and the protection of journalists.

Media Freedom in Afghanistan faces severe setbacks as repression of Journalists intensified in past year
read more

US Delegation, led by Zalmay Khalilzad, visit Kabul

By Fidel Rahmati

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Taliban states that the U.S. Special Envoy for Prisoner Affairs and former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, visited Kabul and held talks with Amir Khan Muttaqi regarding the release of prisoners.

Zia Ahmad Takal, Deputy Spokesperson for the Taliban Ministry of Foreign Affairs, announced the meeting on Thursday, March 20, via a press release on X/Twitter.

He added that the discussion also covered providing consular services to Afghan nationals in the United States.

Takal quoted Adam Boehler , the U.S. Special Envoy for Prisoner Affairs, who also stated that progress on prisoner issues between the Taliban and the U.S. is a good step toward building “trust.”

Meanwhile, Muttaqi referred to the visit of the U.S. delegation as a positive development in relations between the Taliban and Washington, emphasizing that the group seeks relations with all countries, guided by a “balanced policy.”

He further stated that the U.S. and the Taliban should overcome the consequences of their 20-year war and establish positive political and economic relations with each other.

The U.S. State Department has not yet commented on the matter.

It is important to note that this is the first visit by a U.S. delegation in more than three years since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan.

This visit comes at a time when recently, Dorothy Shea, the Acting U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, emphasized that Washington is distrustful of the Taliban and considers normalizing relations with them to be impossible.

The ongoing dialogue, particularly regarding prisoners and consular services, could serve as a foundation for future engagements. However, the political complexities surrounding the Taliban’s rule and the global diplomatic stance towards them suggest that full normalization may still be far off.

US Delegation, led by Zalmay Khalilzad, visit Kabul
read more

Taliban Frees American Tourist Held in Afghanistan Since 2022

George Glezmann was detained while traveling in the country after the Taliban’s victory in the war. Secretary of State Marco Rubio thanked Qatar for helping to secure his release.

The Taliban on Thursday released George Glezmann, an American held since 2022 in Afghanistan, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.

Mr. Glezmann, an Atlanta native, was a Delta Air Lines mechanic who was detained while visiting Afghanistan as a tourist in December 2022. The State Department had officially designated him a wrongful detainee.

Mr. Glezmann boarded a Qatari aircraft in Kabul, the Afghan capital, to fly to Doha, Qatar, with U.S. and Qatari officials on Thursday. Qatar maintains close ties with the ruling Taliban government in Afghanistan and has hosted talks between it and U.S. officials. Negotiations between the first Trump administration and Taliban insurgents for a U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan occurred in Doha.

In his announcement of Mr. Glezmann’s release, Mr. Rubio thanked the Qatari government for its help. Adam Boehler, who had been President Trump’s pick for special envoy for hostage affairs, took part in the negotiations with the Taliban.

The meeting in Kabul between American and Taliban officials was the first known in-person contact of any significance between the two governments since Mr. Trump took office in January. Mr. Boehler was accompanied on the trip by Zalmay Khalilzad, the special envoy for Afghanistan reconciliation in the first Trump administration and a former ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq and the United Nations.

Mr. Boehler arrived at the meeting in Kabul dressed in a gray jacket, black sweater and black baseball cap. Mr. Khalilzad wore a navy suit and purple-and-red floral tie. They sat at a wooden table across from Amir Khan Muttaqi, the foreign minister of Afghanistan, and other Afghan officials, photographs of the meeting showed.

The Taliban toppled a U.S.-backed Afghan government in August 2021 and returned to power after President Joseph R. Biden Jr. executed the troop withdrawal that Mr. Trump had negotiated in his first term. The United States does not have diplomatic relations with the Taliban and has imposed sanctions on its officials. Moderate Taliban officials are seeking to normalize relations with the United States.

The United States does not maintain a presence in Kabul, unlike European countries, which have been more successful in negotiating releases of their citizens with the Taliban.

Mr. Rubio said on Thursday that Mr. Glezmann’s release was “also a reminder that other Americans are still detained in Afghanistan.”

The State Department said it was still seeking the return of six American detainees in Afghanistan and the remains of one U.S. citizen. The agency has not labeled them wrongfully detained, although one State Department official said the Americans were unjustly detained.

A wrongful detention designation means the U.S. government tries to prioritize freeing that citizen.

The department has focused on Mahmood Shah Habibi, an Afghan American businessman who was taken from his vehicle near his home in Kabul in August 2022, according to an F.B.I. report. Mr. Habibi worked for the Asia Consultancy Group, a telecommunications company based in Kabul.

The Taliban government released two Americans, Ryan Corbett and William Wallace McKenty, in late January in a prisoner swap arranged by the Biden administration. U.S. officials released Khan Mohammed, a member of the Taliban who had been imprisoned for life in California on charges of drug trafficking and terrorism. Mr. Biden gave a conditional commutation to Mr. Mohammed before he left office.

Taliban Frees American Tourist Held in Afghanistan Since 2022
read more

Challenges, Progress in Foreign Policy of Islamic Emirate in 1403

In 1403, officials of the Islamic Emirate also traveled to regional countries.

Despite the caretaker government of Afghanistan not being officially recognized in 1403, the Islamic Emirate managed to expand its relations with various countries.

Throughout the year, the Islamic Emirate sought to strengthen its international position by appointing new ambassadors to Uzbekistan and the United Arab Emirates, reopening embassies, and increasing the number of active diplomatic missions.

On the 19th of Mizan, 1403 (October 10, 2024), Abdul Ghafar Bahar presented his credentials to the Foreign Minister of Uzbekistan, while Badruddin Haqqani handed over his credentials to the President of the UAE on the 8th of Qaws, 1403 (November 28, 2024).

Additionally, Italy and Nicaragua introduced their non-resident ambassadors to Afghanistan. Sabrina Ugolini was appointed by Italy, and Michael Campbell was introduced by Nicaragua. Italy sent its representative on the 6th of Aqrab, 1403 (October 27, 2024), and Nicaragua on the 2nd of Saratan, 1403 (June 22, 2024).

Another major development in the foreign policy of the Islamic Emirate was the reopening of the Saudi embassy in Kabul and the appointment of diplomats to countries such as Kazakhstan, India, and Oman. As a result, the number of active political missions of the Islamic Emirate abroad exceeded 40, while the number of foreign diplomatic missions in Kabul reached close to 20.

On the 20th of Dalwa, 1403 (February 8, 2025), Alireza Bikdeli, the acting ambassador of Iran in Kabul, stated: “Despite the strong will of the senior officials of both countries to enhance Iran’s relations with Afghanistan within the framework of good neighborly ties, the coming year will, God willing, be more successful in improving relations and mutual benefits.”

Meanwhile, Kyrgyzstan became the second country, after Kazakhstan, to remove the Islamic Emirate from its list of banned entities. This development has also attracted attention in Russia, though no official action has been taken by Moscow so far.

Zamir Kabulov, Russia’s special representative for Afghanistan, stated on the 14th of Mizan, 1403 (October 5, 2024): “A fundamental decision on this matter has been made by Russia’s top leadership. However, this process must be carried out within the framework of Russian law. It requires thorough work by lawyers, parliament, and other institutions to ensure the process is completed in the right manner.”

In 1403, officials of the Islamic Emirate also traveled to regional countries. These visits included high-level delegations, such as the Foreign Minister, Minister of Defense, Minister of Interior, and other acting ministers visiting neighboring countries.

On the 26th of Hoot 1403 (March 16, 2025), Amir Khan Muttaqi, the acting foreign minister, stated: “Balanced policy means that we do not fight one country to please another, and we do not oppose one country for the satisfaction of another. We seek normal relations with all countries.”

Afghanistan also hosted several high-profile foreign officials in 1403. Notable visitors to Kabul included the Prime Minister of Uzbekistan, the Special Representative of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs of the United Nations, the Secretary of the Russian Security Council, and the Foreign Minister of Iran.

On the 8th of Dalwa, 1403 (January 27, 2025), Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said about his visit to Afghanistan: “We have always been significantly affected by developments in Afghanistan. Therefore, it is natural for us to be sensitive to the fate, developments, and policies of our neighboring country and to be able to manage them.”

Globally, various meetings focused on Afghanistan took place. Key gatherings included the UN Working Group meetings on Afghanistan, meetings of special representatives in the Doha process, and the sixth Moscow Format meeting.

On the 13th of Mizan, 1403 (October 4, 2024), Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated: “Pragmatic dialogue between Moscow and Kabul is essential. We believe that maintaining constructive dialogues with the current Afghan government serves the interests of security, economic development, and national cohesion in Afghanistan.”

Meanwhile, the United Nations Security Council held five meetings on Afghanistan, ultimately extending the mandate of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) for another year.

On the 28th of Hoot 1403 (March 18, 2025), Dorothy Shea, the US representative to the United Nations, said: “We call on UNAMA to strengthen its efforts to promote Afghans in enjoyment of human rights, particularly for women and girls. We support UNAMA’s work to help address the widespread humanitarian crisis and stabilize the economy.”

Finally, the unclear stance of the United States toward Afghanistan’s caretaker government remains a challenge. The newly elected US president has repeatedly criticized the withdrawal process from Afghanistan and the state of military bases. In response, while the Islamic Emirate seeks good relations with the US, it has accused Donald Trump of lacking accurate information about Afghanistan.

Challenges, Progress in Foreign Policy of Islamic Emirate in 1403
read more

1403 Review: Economic Situation of Afghanistan Amid Reduced Aid

With the new US administration under Donald Trump, an 83% suspension and eventual halt of US aid, including to Afghanistan, has raised global concerns.

Despite the implementation of economic projects in 1403, poverty and unemployment remained major challenges in Afghanistan.

Additionally, international economic sanctions against Afghanistan and the halt in foreign aid, including reductions in humanitarian assistance from global donors, further worsened the country’s economic struggles.

Migration and natural disasters, such as floods, also negatively impacted the economy.

“Every day we come to the square, but we cannot find work. We face many difficulties. We live in a rented house, and we ask wealthy individuals to help those in need,” said Kazem, a Kabul resident.

Impact of US Aid Reduction

With the new US administration under Donald Trump, an 83% suspension and eventual halt of US aid, including to Afghanistan, has raised global concerns.

In early Hoot, 1403 (February 19-March 20, 2025), UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned about the severe consequences of the US aid reduction, stating that more than 9 million Afghans would lose access to health and support services.

On Hoot 11, 1403 (March 1, 2025), Guterres said: “The consequences will be especially devastating for vulnerable people around the world. In Afghanistan, more than nine million people could lose access to health and protection services, as hundreds of mobile health teams and other critical programmes face suspension.”

Islamic Emirate’s Ministry of Economy criticized the politicization of humanitarian aid.

On Hoot 21, 1403 (March 11, 2025), ministry spokesperson Abdul Rahman Habib said: “Humanitarian aid aims to assist people in emergencies and must be provided impartially, according to humanitarian and ethical principles. These aids should not be used for political purposes.”

Banking restrictions, including limitations on money transfers and frozen Afghan assets, remain major obstacles to Afghanistan’s economic progress. These challenges have further exacerbated poverty and unemployment.

Recently, UNAMA chief Roza Otunbayeva expressed concerns at a UN Security Council meeting, revealing that in 2025, 23 million Afghans will require humanitarian assistance.

Similarly, the World Bank, in its latest 2024 report, warned of a serious food security crisis in Afghanistan. It stated that 11.6 million people (25% of the population) are facing severe food insecurity.

1403 Review: Economic Situation of Afghanistan Amid Reduced Aid
read more

Uncertainty Surrounds US Immigration Policies for Afghan Allies

Meanwhile, several US immigration applicants have expressed concerns about their future.

Shawn VanDiver, the head of AfghanEvac, said that the recent remarks by the US State Department spokesperson regarding the relocation of Afghan allies of American forces are unclear.

He emphasized that the State Department must clarify whether former Afghan allies of the US military are included in the travel ban list, which restricts citizens from Afghanistan and several other countries from entering the United States.

Shawn VanDiver said, “We would really caution against interpreting this as complete truth. We know that there is a list of 41 to 43 countries that are on the list, the nationals of which won’t be allowed to enter the United States, even if they have a valid US visa or a green card, potentially a green card.”

A day earlier, the US State Department spokesperson stated that they had not received any list banning Afghan allies of American forces from traveling to the US.

Meanwhile, a senior member of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee has written a letter to the US Secretary of State, urging the relocation of Afghans who had worked alongside American forces.

Jeanne Shaheen, a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said, “I respectfully urge you to continue the longstanding support for these individuals and take the necessary steps to lift the restrictions preventing Afghan SIV applicants and holders from traveling to the United States.”
“Their arrival in the United States is not only a matter of moral responsibility but a national security priority that we stand by our commitments during the most challenging of moments,” she continued.

Meanwhile, several US immigration applicants have expressed concerns about their future.

Alireza Karimi, an advocate for immigrant rights, told TOLOnews, “The slow pace of processing these cases not only endangers their lives but also questions the credibility and moral commitments of the US Washington must expedite the relocation process, as prolonging this issue will have severe humanitarian consequences and cause a major diplomatic crisis.”

On Monday, US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a press briefing that there is no list banning citizens of certain countries from traveling to the US. She also emphasized that, similar to the previous administration, the Biden administration remains committed to relocating and resettling former Afghan allies of the US military and government.

Uncertainty Surrounds US Immigration Policies for Afghan Allies
read more