The Taliban, who returned to power in 2021, have been accused of enforcing a system of gender apartheid in Afghanistan. Women returning to the country must live with oppressive laws that ban them from showing their faces, speaking or appearing in public, as well as being excluded from most jobs and education. Anyone caught breaking these rules faces public flogging.
Speaking to the Guardian and Zan Times, an Afghan news agency, at a border crossing in southern Afghanistan, Sahar*, 40, is travelling with five children and says she has no idea where she will live now. A widow originally from Baghlan, a city in northern Afghanistan, she had been living in Iran for more than a decade. She ran a small tailoring workshop and had recently put down a deposit on a home. Last week, she says she was detained, taken with her children from a refugee camp near the southern city of Shiraz, and deported.
“I didn’t even get to pack their clothes. They came in the middle of the night. I begged them to give me just two days to collect my things. But they didn’t listen. They threw us out like garbage.”
Until recently, women were rarely forcibly returned from Iran. Men, often undocumented labourers, were more likely to face arrest and deportation. But Afghan border officials say there has been a recent shift, with at least 100 unaccompanied women deported through a single border point in Nimroz province, in the south of the country, between March and May this year.
Returning to Afghanistan without a male guardian puts women in direct conflict with Taliban law, which prohibits women from travelling alone. Many of those returned from Iran find themselves stranded at the border, unable to continue their journey.
With temperatures now reaching 52C, local officials say that a number of people have died during the forced crossings. Border officials say at least 13 bodies have arrived in the past two weeks, but it was not clear whether they had died of heat and thirst or were killed during Israel’s airstrikes in Iran.
Those arriving at border crossings in southern Afghanistan say they are thirsty, hungry and exhausted, having walked for hours under the sun. Most have no belongings, documentation or plan about where to live.
“From Shiraz to Zahedan [close to the Afghan border], they took everything from us. My bank card had 15 million tomans (£110). They charged 50,000 tomans for a bottle of water, 100,000 for a cold sandwich. And if you didn’t have it, your child went without,” says Sahar.
The Taliban says it offers short-term shelter and transport assistance to women deported without a mahram (an adult male who can accompany her on a journey). But many returnees say they received no such help. Under Taliban policy, most single women are barred from receiving land, travelling alone to their home province, or accessing employment.Sahar says her options in Afghanistan are bleak. She has an elderly mother in Baghlan, but no home, no job and no husband, meaning, under Taliban rules, she cannot travel alone or work legally. “I asked for land [from the Taliban], anything to start again. They said, ‘You’re a woman, you have no mahram. You don’t qualify.’”
The UN agency, the International Organization for Migration, and other groups provide temporary aid at border crossings, but they do not have the mandate or resources for long-term support.
In the buses taking deportees from detention to the Afghanistan borders, women also say they are subjected to verbal abuse, bribes demanded for basic services and no air conditioning in extreme heat. “They said it’s a waste for you Afghans. My child cried from the heat, but the driver laughed and mocked us,” says Zahra*.
‘They threw us out like garbage’: Iran rushes deportation of 4 million Afghans before deadline
About 800,000 people have been deported to Afghanistan, a desperately poor country, under an Iranian campaign that accelerated sharply in June.
Hundreds of thousands of hungry, exhausted and often battered Afghans have been expelled from Iran in recent weeks, under a harsh deportation drive that accelerated sharply last month, international aid workers say.
Since March, when Iranian authorities ordered undocumented residents to leave the country, about 800,000 Afghans have poured across the border, Babar Baloch, a spokesman for the United Nations’ refugee agency, said on Monday. Almost 600,000 of them have been forced out since June 1.
During and since the 12-day war between Israel and Iran last month, Iranian officials have repeatedly cast suspicion on Afghans as possible spies for Israel, amplifying longstanding rumors and tensions. In that environment, and with the approach of a July 6 deadline set by the Iranian government, the pace of migrations soared to an average of about 30,000 per day recently, peaking on Friday at more than 50,000 people crossing into Afghanistan, Mr. Baloch said.
Iran has ranked as the world’s biggest host country for refugees, with nearly 3.5 million according to the United Nations, primarily people who fled decades of war and violence in Afghanistan. Aid groups estimate that in reality, the Afghan population in Iran is much larger — including about two million refugees who are undocumented — and Iran’s patience with them appears to have run out.
Iranian authorities say that Afghans with proper documents are still accepted, and U.N. officials confirm that some of those returning to Afghanistan in recent weeks had received visas from Iran’s consulate in the western town of Herat to go back to Iran. But most Afghans in Iran face a harsher reality.
“The gloves are off,” Arafat Jamal, the U.N. refugee agency representative in Kabul said in a phone interview. “There’s a bit of a frenzy at the moment, no one is going to oppose deportations of Afghans right now so those who wish to deport them have been ramping it up.”
Even before the war, Afghans faced barbed taunts about taking subsidized food from the mouths of Iranians.
Returnees, including refugees with valid legal documentation for being in Iran, describe being picked up by the police from their places of work or seized on the street, and then being forced into buses and held in detention sites before being transported to the border. They also relate endless extortionate demands for bribes to get out of detention centers, onto buses or finally to get across the border.
The returnees, from urban professionals to day laborers, include many who were born in Iran, have never set foot in Afghanistan and are more attuned to Iranian culture and society than the more draconian rule of the Taliban, Mr. Jamal said.
“The big concern is what happens to these people. They are from this country but hardly of it,” Mr. Jamal said. “They are bewildered, disoriented and very sad at leaving their work or their lives in Iran.”
But their arrival also imposes a heavy strain on the resources and, potentially, the stability of communities in Afghanistan, where nearly half the population lives below the poverty line and millions go short of food. Afghanistan, with a population of about 44 million, has absorbed more than 3.5 million returnees since September 2023, U.N. officials say, including hundreds of thousands forced to leave Pakistan.
Western aid donors, deterred by the Taliban’s brutal disdain for women and human rights have left international aid agencies with scant capacity to help. The U.N. refugee agency reports its appeal for $216 million in 2025 for Afghanistan is only a little over one-quarter funded.
The United States previously accounted for about 40 percent of the refugee agency’s budget, but the Trump administration has slashed that support.
Iran Carries Out Mass Expulsion of Afghan Refugees
Trying to get important documents from the state can be a maddening and expensive ordeal in Afghanistan. Many complain about the time-consuming and frustrating process of applying for a tazkira (ID card), passport, driving license, or a nikahkhat (marriage certificate). From government offices to courts to legal affairs departments, Afghans can get trapped in paperwork and corruption. If a clumsy official has made a mistake on a document – not an uncommon occurrence – it is the citizen who will pay the price, entering into a whole other layer of bureaucracy. AAN’s Rohullah Sorush has been hearing from people trying to get tazkiras, passports and marriage certificates to see how much time and money it takes to get these essential documents.
Getting a marriage certificate
Traditionally, when people get married in Afghanistan, they do not get an official government document to certify the marriage. They either get a booklet from the mullah who performed the nikah (marriage), which is similar to an official nikahkhat, with photos of the spouses, their fingerprints and other details, or a more basic document, also from the mullah, that mentions the names of the spouses, the mullah and the amount of mahr, the gift given by the groom to the bride as stipulated in Islamic law.
For decades, successive Afghan governments from the communist era onwards have tried to make the use of marriage certificates mandatory.[1] Under the Islamic Republic, human rights and women’s rights groups hoped that an official nikahkhat could reduce child and forced marriages (see this 2007 report from the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission) and there were also public awareness campaigns – but to limited effect (see this IWPR report from 2016). This has been echoed anecdotally to AAN, which asked more than a dozen people if they had registered their marriage at the time, and all simply said they did not.
However, since 2021, getting an official certificate – a nikahkhat – seems to have become more common. AAN interviews suggest the change has partly been driven by the surge in out-migration since 2021, with Afghan couples travelling to Europe or regional countries, where they need official documents, including a nikahkhat, or one spouse trying to bring the other to their new home country. A report by the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) in 2023 found that after the collapse of the Republic, for Afghans seeking to leave the country for various reasons, such as unemployment, poverty and instability, getting documentation – including a nikahkhat and a passport – became a priority. A defence lawyer in Balkh province, Amir Rasuli, gave another reason for the increased demand:
In the past, spouses were content to have [documents from the mullah who conducted the marriage], but recently, the demand for official marriage certificates has increased. Having an official marriage certificate guarantees women’s rights such as nafaqa [financial support, including food, clothes and housing], inheritance and mahr; it specifies the husband’s responsibilities towards his wife.
However, getting a marriage certificate is not a straightforward process, as Khadija’s story illustrates.
Khadija’s story: the ultimate bureaucratic obstacle – state collapse
Khadija, who is 35 and lives in Kabul with her husband and two daughters, has experience of trying to get a nikahkhat under both the Republic and the current Islamic Emirate government. She began the process under the Republic:
We had a traditional nikahkhat, but then my husband said we should have an official one. He was very busy, so he asked me to take all our ID cards [mine, his and our daughters’] and go to apply for an official nikahkhat.
Khadija did not know where or how to begin:
I knew nothing about the procedure for obtaining a nikahkhat and didn’t even know the address of the court. So, I asked a relative and he told me to go to the court in Jangalak area in PD [police district] 6 … He said, first, I needed to go to a petition writer [ariza nawis] near the court to write an application for me, which I did.
When Khadija took the application to the court, she discovered there were two more steps, involving the religious and local authorities:
[The court] then gave me a form to take to the mullah imam of our mosque and the wakil-e guzar [neighbourhood representative] to confirm that I was living in Charqala-ye Chardi. My family knew the wakil-e guzar and the mullah imam, so it didn’t take much time for them to sign and stamp my form.
After that, Khadija’s relative told her there was yet another step:
I then had to take the form to the relevant municipality district so they could confirm that the wakil-e guzar was active. I didn’t know the address of the municipality office in District Six, so I asked my father-in-law to take it there.
He took her form to the municipality office in Kart-e se, but found out that another piece of documentation was needed:
They asked him to bring the safai [municipal tax] booklet of our house, but my father-in-law told them we lived in a rented house. They said if he could show them an electricity bill, it’d be alright. So he came home, got the last electricity bill and took it back. They accepted that and signed and stamped the form.
Khadija had now completed all the steps and was given a day to come to the court to finalise the document. However, events intervened:
I went to the court and submitted the form. It was so crowded I thought all the residents of Kabul had come to obtain their nikahkhats. A court employee took my application form and dated it and said, “Now your application is dated. You should come in the month of Sunbula [21 August to 20 September].” But then the Taliban came to power in August 2021, almost a month after I got the date for my application. As a result, I couldn’t get my nikahkhat at that time.
Khadija could do nothing but wait for things to settle. It took a while for the courts to function again and then she tried again to get her nikahkhat:
After a few months, I was informed that the court had reopened and was processing the petitions and applications from the Republic era… The following day, I went to the court, but my name was among those marked ‘absent’ because they hadn’t appeared on the specified date. I talked to someone in the court who advised me to return another day, when they could provide a new date for my application.
When Khadija returned, she faced more problems, including how soldiers behaved towards clients in the court:
It was 9 o’clock when I arrived at the court. It was very crowded. There were men and women, young and old. Some Taliban soldiers were trying to bring order there, but when they lost their patience, they beat people. I waited in a long line, but when it was my turn to submit my application, they said they wouldn’t collect it now. They told me they collected applications and petitions early in the morning. Around 300 to 400 people were in a line every morning, every day.
Khadija then asked her husband to take a day off work to go in her place:
He went to the court and they dated the application. Then we went to the court on the date to get our nikahkhat. We also brought two witnesses. We paid one thousand afghanis [USD14] and finally got our nikahkhat. It’d taken us nine months in total.
Steps for obtaining a marriage certificate
Drawing on our interviewees’ accounts, we have gleaned that these steps appear to be needed to obtain a nikahkhat:
Step one: Submit a formal petition to your local primary court’s registration department, with photos and IDs of the spouses.
Step two: Fill out a request form, which includes questions about the spouses’ first and last names, their residence and ahleyat (in this context, whether they are adults, of sound mind and in good health) and if there are any obstacles to the marriage. The form requires authorisation from the mosque’s imam, two neighbours, the wakil-e guzar and the district office. It is then returned to the relevant directorate or primary court for further processing.
Step three: Pay the marriage certificate fee using a payment slip provided by the court.
Step four: Return to the court to present two witnesses who can testify to the marriage and provide original IDdocuments, completed registration documents and photos. A return date is set.
Step five: One or both spouses go to the relevant court with their IDs and receive their marriage certificate.
For Afghans needing a nikakhat in Europe, there is an additional step: they must get a translated version, which has to be verified by the qazaya-ye dawlat (Government Affairs Office) in Kabul, or the provincial Department of Justice, and be approved by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Getting this additional layer of approval only makes the whole process even longer and more complicated, as Mansur Ahmadi found out.
Mansur Ahmadi’s story: the problem of being born in one province and moving to another
Mansour Ahmadi, who currently lives in Europe, travelled to Afghanistan in 2022, where he tried to get a nikahkhat. He also had to get an official translation so that the certificate could be used outside Afghanistan. This required visits to two ministerial departments in Balkh province: the Department of Justice and the Department of Foreign Affairs to verify the translation. That was before one of the bureaucrats noticed a tiny error on his nikahkhat over the amount of mahrhe had paid to his wife:
I took my nikahkhat and its translated version to the Department of Justice for their confirmation. They saw that in the upper section, the amount of the mahr was written as 100,000 afghanis [around USD1,400], while in the lower section it was written as 90,000 afghanis. They objected to this and didn’t approve it. No matter how much I tried to explain that it was a mistake and that it should’ve said that the mahr was 100,000 afghanis, with 10,000 paid in cash and 90,000 remaining, they wouldn’t accept it.
The judiciary gave Mansur a letter which he had to take to its district office in Sholgara, where he was last officially registered before he moved to Europe, so that they could correct the error and approve it.
But even after that, the process was still not over. As he needed an official nikahkhat in Europe, Mansur also had to take the translated version of the nikahkhat to the provincial Directorate of Foreign Affairs, to be signed and confirmed. Here, he faced another problem over a discrepancy between the address on his nikahkhat and the address on his ID:
The Directorate of Foreign Affairs was confused that my ID states my primary residence as Baghlan, and they asked why [ie, why it wasn’t Balkh]. I told them my ID had been issued several years ago in Baghlan, when I was still living there. Two years earlier, I’d moved to Sholgara, which was confirmed by the wakil-e guzar and the judge. But they didn’t accept this and said they’d give me another letter to take to Sholgara district so they could confirm I was living there.
Mansur said that getting a marriage certificate in Mazar-e Sharif meant not only bureaucracy but also corruption:
Everyone has problems with getting marriage certificates. They don’t issue them to anyone unless there’s an urgent need, such as being very ill, or if there’s an extraordinary matter brought by a [government] authority requiring them to issue it. For example, if someone has a serious illness that necessitates travel, they may issue a marriage certificate. In the city of Mazar, this is how it works. However, in the districts, if you pay a bribe, they’ll provide a guarantee and issue a marriage certificate. There, a local representative must confirm it, and you need to know someone who can confirm your residence, in exchange for money.
Luckily for Mansur, his lawyer in Europe offered him advice:
I was very frustrated and disappointed. I’d have to go through the whole process again, which would be time-consuming. So, I didn’t do it. Instead, I contacted my lawyer in Europe and told him about the problems I was having. My lawyer said what I’d obtained was good enough and I shouldn’t worry about it, as they’d accept it without the approval of the Directorate of Foreign Affairs.
The defence lawyer in Balkh province, Amir Rasuli, was very critical of the amount of paperwork involved in getting a marriage certificate. Most steps, he said, were unnecessary and could be eliminated:
The whole process of obtaining a nikahkhat takes a lot of time. There are steps such as confirmation by two neighbours, going to the imam [mullah] of the mosque and the wakil-e guzar to confirm that a husband and wife live in a specific area of a province and then going to the municipality [office in the] district to confirm that the wakil-e guzar is still active – all of this is unnecessary. I believe that, when you have an ID card showing you are Afghan and a resident of Afghanistan, the relevant courts and other administrations should cut all the other paperwork and easily issue a nikahkhat for you.
It should be very simple. It should be that you apply, have your witnesses and your documents. Then the court should issue a nikahkhat for you based on your documents and the testimony of witnesses. This way, it won’t be time-consuming, and applicants won’t be tearing their hair out with frustration.
It is not just the number of steps needed to get a document but also that it is not clear at the outset what is actually needed to obtain it. One of the threads running through our interviews is how information is given out ‘drip-by-drip’: interviewees think they have completed all the steps necessary, only to be told there is yet another step, which may require going back home to get other documents or getting signatures from relatives – who may not even be in the country. As well, people describe being told to go to one office, only to find that they had been sent to the wrong office and must go to another office instead, which may not even be in the same city or province and will certainly require more queuing and navigating the crowds. The lack of transparency and clear information about what steps are needed at the outset, is maddening. Interviewees end up exhausted, out of pocket and at their wits’ end.
Getting a passport or tazkira
Tazkiras and passports are even more essential than marriage certificates and just as difficult to obtain. They are necessary to work abroad, receive disability benefits, even getting a SIM card for your phone. Many Afghans have never had either a passport or an ID. According to a 2023 report by the United Nations refugee agency UNHCR, 86 per cent of the more than 70,000 households assessed reported a lack of such documents among their family members, especially women and girls. The following stories show how painful it can be to try to acquire these crucial documents, particularly when mistakes made by officials need fixing.
Leyaqat Ali’s story: the missing ‘Sayed’
Having failed to find a job in Afghanistan, Leyaqat Ali, an unemployed university graduate from Ghazni province, decided to travel abroad for work. For this, he needed a passport and a visa:
I needed to support my family, along with my brothers, as my father passed away during the Covid-19 pandemic. I just couldn’t find a job, so I decided to go to either Pakistan or Iran for work. I needed a passport and a visa though. I applied for a passport online at the beginning of 2024. Then, in August 2024, I got a message that I should go to Kabul for all the procedures, such as giving my biometrics and payment.
Leyaqat went to Kabul, where he stayed with a relative, and left at six in the morning for the passport office. When he arrived, it was already crowded:
I wanted to go in, but a guard stopped me. I told him I had come from a remote area, but he got angry and shouted at me. He said they couldn’t take on any more clients that day. He told me to come back the next day, but very early.
Leyaqat had no option but to go back to his relative’s home and try again the next day:
The following day, I left at four in the morning and went to the passport office. I was surprised to see many people had come much earlier than me. I stood in a line where there were already 15 to 20 people ahead of me.
This time, his papers were collected and he was told to go to either Pashtani Bank or the Afghanistan National Bank to pay the fee, which he did. Next, he had to get his biometrics taken. At this point, however, an error with his name was discovered:
An officer asked for my tazkira. When he checked my name, it didn’t match what was in the database. In my tazkira, my name is Sayed Leyaqat Ali, but in the database, it didn’t have the word ‘Sayed’. So my biometrics weren’t taken and the officer told me, “Go and correct your name and then come for the biometrics.” He told me that, at the entrance gate of the passport office, there was an office that deals with such issues.
Leyaqat did as he was instructed, but after waiting in another crowd, he was turned away:
The employee checked my tazkira and told me, “Your name can’t be corrected here. You have to go to the General Directorate of Civil Registration Services at the National Statistics and Information Authority [NSIA] in Sara-ye Shamali.” I was very upset and hopeless, but I had to go. However, unfortunately, in Sara-ye Shamali, I was again told that it was impossible to correct my name there and that I had to go to my home province, Ghazni, to correct my name in my tazkira.
So Leyaqat went back to Ghazni, where he found yet another convoluted process:
I travelled to Ghazni and visited the statistics department. They kept sending me from one office to another and there was a lot of paperwork involved. It took me two days to complete the necessary forms. After that, I had to wait for a whole month to be notified that my name’d been corrected. Next, I needed to apply for an electronic ID, which took two months to get printed in Kabul and sent to Ghazni.
In total, he said, correcting his name on the tazkira and obtaining the electronic tazkira took three months. “Now that my tazkira is correct,” Leyaqat said, “and I have the electronic version, I need to go back to the passport office in Kabul for them to take my biometrics before I can obtain my passport.”
Having to correct a name in a tazkira is a common problem, which people complain is both time-consuming and costly to amend. Applicants accuse Taliban-appointed officials of sloppiness, of making mistakes in writing their names (in this Zawia News article, for example, officials wrote ‘Saqi’ instead of ‘Safi’). Sometimes, they even get the gender wrong. However, it is a problem familiar from the Republic and, indeed, earlier eras. There are also even bigger errors: it took Sayed Ali from Charolak district of Balkh almost a year to resolve the mistake that was preventing him getting an electronic ID.
Sayed Ali’s story: disabled, and made to wait for treatment for a year
Sayed Ali has a disability in one leg, which he wanted to get treated. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) informed him that he needed an electronic ID card to get treatment at their clinic. However, when he applied for it, he encountered inefficiency, delays, technical problems and blunders, all made worse by the fact of his disability: “First, I needed to correct an error in my tazkira,” he said, “because they’d swapped my father and grandfather’s names around. I had to pay money as a bribe to get that done so that I wouldn’t have to travel all the way to Kabul to correct it.” Then, once he’d registered, Sayed Ali had to wait for his tazkira to be issued at the National Statistics and Information Authority (NSIA) in Kabul and sent to Mazar-e Sharif:
I waited for four months. I was waiting for a message from the statistics department [in Mazar], but nothing happened. I had to go there, in person, as I really needed the tazkira for my treatment. They told me, “Your tazkira hasn’t been published in Kabul, so come again in a month’s time.”
Because of his disability, Sayed Ali asked his nephew to go to NSIA on his behalf:
[My nephew] went there, not once, not twice, but three times, each time after a month. Then, they said my electronic tazkira had come… But when they entered the serial number and searched their database, they said the tazkira wasn’t there. Over the next seven months, my nephew went back [to NISA] seven times and my tazkira still hadn’t come from Kabul. Then, I went with him and I told the people in NSIA that: “You see, I am disabled and I need to be treated for the injuries in my leg.”
But, he said, they sent him away again:
After ten days, I visited that centre again with my nephew. His friend [at NISA] said that the tazkira had arrived. He showed us a tazkira and said, “Look! It is your tazkira. Your father’s name is Sayed Hussain.” However, it wasn’t mine. The photo in the tazkira looked like me and it had the same father’s name as mine, but it was not my tazkira.
On the twelfth or thirteenth visit, the bureaucrats decided to start from scratch:
It was finally decided that we should pay 1,500 afghanis for a duplicate [al-musanna]. We paid again, and I was told the duplicate would be ready in three months. I went back four or five times to get the duplicate, and finally, it arrived.
By the time Sayed Ali’s duplicate tazkira came from Kabul, the mystery of the original missing tazkira was finally resolved:
NSIA employees had mistakenly given my tazkira to someone else, who had poor eyesight and couldn’t see that it wasn’t his tazkira. He took it home, but when he went to withdraw the money that his son in Europe had sent, the bank told him that the tazkira he’d brought as proof of his identity wasn’t his.
Sayed Ali eventually got his ID card and was able to get medical treatment, but only after the best part of a year of stress and wasted time.
For Afghans in rural areas, getting documents means travelling and incurring additional expenses. The cost, both in lost work and money spent, may be something they can ill afford, but they deem it necessary because of all the services that now require documentation.
Screenshot of video showing families waiting at the Directorate of Population Registration Services’ outdoor reception centre to apply for identity documents and birth certificates. Photo: National Institute of National Statistics and Information Authority (NSIA), undated
Farid Agha’s story: countless days, nights and afghanis wasted
“You can end up waiting for hours, or even days and nights, yet still can’t get an ID because there are too many crowds and too little organisation,” said Farid Agha, from Zurmat district of Paktia province. He needed an electronic ID because the government had made everything dependent on it. “Without it,” he said, “your SIM card would be blocked and you wouldn’t be able to get anything done in government offices.” What was even worse, Farid Agha needed documentation for his whole family. Since his daughter was going abroad, he needed to get a passport for her. Additionally, his son had passed the university entrance exam and needed to enrol, where an electronic ID was also required. There were no electronic ID services in his home district, so he had to travel to the provincial capital:
We made the trip to Gardez city to obtain the electronic ID. We registered at one of the photography shops there. I took my entire family with me – it’s more than two hours away – because I’d heard that all family members needed to be present for the ID process to proceed and the registration to be completed.
Farid Agha and his family had to wait in Gardez, where they knew no one, and the expenses built up:
I took the forms to the civil registration office. When we arrived, the office was extremely crowded and disorganised, making the wait for our forms to be checked very frustrating. We stood in line for two consecutive days, but our turn never came. Eventually, I had to send my family members back to the village because we didn’t have anyone to stay with in Gardez. We’d spent two nights in a hotel, but I could no longer afford to stay there. Travelling back and forth every day wasn’t feasible either, as the fare from our area to the centre is 500 afghanis per person [USD 7].
Farid Agha also had to return to his village and come back again to the civil registration office, but this time, he did not take his family with him. “They checked my paper documents, but only me and my two sons, who are at school, had the documents. The others [another son, two daughters and his wife] didn’t have any,” he said:
The officer told me that I needed to obtain confirmation from the head of the village and the relevant district office to verify that these are indeed my children. I also needed to bring my wife’s father’s ID to get a document for her as well. My wife’s family lives in Pakistan.
He said the situation was very frustrating because, having waited for two weeks, he still could not obtain the ID. It was, he said, “a big headache.”
Farid Agha eventually managed to secure all the documentation, which took over a month, as they had to wait for some of the documents to come from Pakistan. When it was all in order, his family paid for the electronic IDs and had their biometrics taken. But there was one more problem:
I received my ID without any issue. However, there was a mistake in my son’s ID: his grandfather’s name was incorrectly written. The names of all my other children were correct, but my eldest son’s grandfather’s name was wrong. I hadn’t noticed it at the time, but when we got home, my son pointed it out, saying, “Dad, my ID has an error.”
Farid Agha went back to Gardez to get the error in his son’s tazkira corrected, but officials told him he had to go to Kabul to fix it. He said that he had explained to them that it was their mistake, not his or his family’s, and questioned why he should have to go to Kabul. In response, they said that they did not have the authority to correct the name in the province:
I had no choice but to go to Kabul because all my son’s documents were at risk of becoming invalid. The information on his paper tazkira was different from what was on the electronic tazkira, which meant that all his educational documents could become invalid due to a single incorrect name.
Farid Agha spent a lot of time in Kabul trying to correct his son’s name. It took a week of waiting at the civil registration office in Sara-ye Shamali before he got to speak to someone:
When it was my turn, the electronic tazkira department referred me to the Ministry of Interior. Upon arrival, I found it chaotic and overcrowded, making it impossible to secure a turn there. Only the general director of civil registration has the authority to issue orders. I ended up waiting for two days.
Finally, he was told he would need to bring his father’s or brother’s ID to correct the mistake. So he had to travel back to Paktia to retrieve both his father’s and brother’s tazkiras. After returning to the tazkira office, they had taken the documents and told him to come back in two days. When he went to collect his son’s tazkira, the manager at the electronic tazkera department surprised him with another problem:
He challenged me on the reported age of my son, claiming that he appeared older than what I’d indicated in the ID. This added to my frustration. I explained that I’d been trying to obtain the ID for three months and that the only issue was the name, which was an error made by one of his employees. I insisted that I know my son’s age since I am his father. Unfortunately, he refused to accept my explanation and ended up kicking me out of his office, instructing me to correct the age.
Through the help of a family friend, he eventually persuaded the manager to make the correction. But overall, obtaining electronic ID cards for his family cost Farid Agha a lot of money and trouble. He also complained that the price of tazkiras had increased under the Emirate:
During my travels, I ended up spending over 50,000 afghanis [USD 700] on hotel stays and car rentals, both to and from my destination. … The cost is prohibitively high, particularly for ordinary people like farmers. The price for the electronic ID is 500 afghanis [USD 7], and if any corrections are needed, the cost increases to 1,200 afghanis [USD 17].
During the Republic, an electronic ID card only cost 100 afghanis [USD 1.40], and corrections cost 500 afghanis. Now, however, the prices have changed drastically, making it a significant financial burden, especially in a country struggling with poverty.
Despite these challenges and the difficult circumstances of everyday life, hundreds of people still attempt to secure an electronic ID card. Unfortunately, when faced with these obstacles, many ultimately abandon their efforts.
These problems can be even worse for those forced to return to Afghanistan from Pakistan and Iran, especially those who have spent most or all of their lives outside the country. One aid worker told Human Rights Watch in a March 2025 report on deportations from Pakistan that the Emirate should open mobile tazkira-issuing centres at the border. If returning Afghans cannot obtain tazkiras, they cannot register their children for school or buy mobile phones or SIM cards.
Conclusion
When Afghan citizens try to get electronic IDs, passports or marriage certificates, they face inefficiency, endless paperwork, exhausting waits in queues and in crowds and, for many, the need to travel. The convoluted bureaucracyadds to the expense of getting documentation, not only the money spent on fees, but also travel and hotel bills, and the opportunity cost of days wasted in government offices, when they could be working.
These are not new problems, but comparing the situation with the Republic, our interviews suggest there is now greater demand for documents, but not enough staff to deal with that demand. Indeed, there is some evidence that matters may have become even worse since the 20 per cent cut in public sector jobs (Amu), that were announced (Tolonews) in April 2025. In general, since before the fall of the Republic, access to documentation services has become better for men living in previously conflict-ridden areas, but worse for women because public offices are now so much more male-dominated spaces.
As to costs, prices for the documents themselves have gone up under the Emirate. Demands for bribes appear to be less prevalent than under the Republic, although several of our interviews mentioned that a bribe had ‘oiled the wheel’ of getting through one of the many steps in obtaining a document. The potential for unscrupulous officials to make money is clear and indeed, the many steps and different signatures needed create multiple ‘rent-seeking’ opportunities. An environment that is open to corruption is also encouraged by the lack of transparency, the fact that information about procedures is hard to obtain and there is uncertainty over regulations. As our interviewees’ stories show, mistakes by officials only compound the chaos and difficulty, with the burden of fixing administrative errors falling on citizens.
Given that the state not only demands various documents to access certain services but also makes money from issuing them, it could at least ensure that it keeps bureaucratic and procedural hurdles to a minimum. Yet the government shows little sign of recognising this problem, let alone addressing it, despite the acute hardships that most Afghans are facing.
Edited by Kate Clark and Rachel Reid
References
References
↑1
Article two of the 1971 Marriage Law made having a nikahkhat an requirement: see Martin Lau, Islamic Law and the Afghan Legal System, 2003. A 2005 report by Max Planck Institute said that in the communist era, every marriage had to be registered in every district, though this did not happen in practice. In 2007, the Supreme Court issued an order to require marriage certificates, in order to reduce the risk of child marriages, although implementation was low (New Humanitarian).
Months, Years and Thousands of Afghanis Later… Stories of Afghans battling bureaucracy
Germany’s UN envoy voiced deep concern over Afghanistan’s worsening human rights crisis, especially for women and girls, and reaffirmed Berlin’s commitment to supporting the people of Afghanistan.
Germany’s representative to the United Nations has expressed deep concern over the deteriorating human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially regarding the rights of women and girls.
On Monday, July 7, Antje Leendertse, Germany’s UN envoy, reaffirmed her country’s commitment to supporting the Afghanistan people during a UN session.
She praised the efforts of UNAMA and other UN bodies working to improve living conditions in Afghanistan under difficult circumstances.
She also noted Germany’s continued support for the Doha process led by the United Nations, aiming for constructive dialogue on Afghanistan’s future.
Since the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, women and girls in Afghanistan have faced sweeping restrictions, including bans on secondary and higher education, public jobs, and freedom of movement.
The UN and international community have repeatedly condemned these policies as violations of basic human rights, calling for inclusive governance and the restoration of women’s rights in Afghanistan.
Germany urges action on Afghanistan’s Human Rights Crisis
The court charged two Taliban leaders with committing crimes against humanity. A spokesman for the group said it did not recognize the court’s authority
The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants Tuesday for two leaders of Afghanistan’s Taliban regime, alleging that the Afghan government’s persecution of women and girls constitutes crimes against humanity.
The warrants are for Haibatullah Akhundzada, the Supreme Leader of the Taliban, and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, Chief Justice of the Taliban. A spokesman for the regime said the Taliban did not recognize the International Criminal Court and would not abide by its orders.
The Taliban, a group that espouses an extremist version of Islam, has imposed increasingly severe restrictions on women since taking power in Afghanistan in August 2021. Within weeks of toppling the U.S.-backed previous regime, the Taliban abolished the Ministry of Women’s Affairs and banned women from receiving a secondary education or attaining most jobs. The group also imposed a rule barring women from traveling outside without a male chaperone.
The Taliban’s gender policies “resulted in severe violations of fundamental rights and freedoms of the civilian population of Afghanistan, in connection with conducts of murder, imprisonment, torture, rape and enforced disappearance,” the International Criminal Court said in a statement Tuesday.
“We do not recognize any entity under the title of the ‘International Court,’ nor do we acknowledge any obligation toward it,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a social media post Tuesday. “The leadership and officials of the Islamic Emirate have established unparalleled justice in Afghanistan based on the sacred laws of Islamic sharia. Labeling the laws of Islamic sharia as oppressive or against humanity … is a clear expression of enmity and hatred toward the pure religion of Islam and its legal system.”
Afghanistan has the second-worst gender gap in the world, according to a report released last month by the UN that cited major gender disparities in areas relating to heath, education and financial inclusion.
“What we are seeing in Afghanistan is a systematic attempt to erase all women from public life, from being outside, from getting an education, from working and earning their living,” said Zahra Nader, the editor in chief of Zan Times, a newsroom covering women’s rights in Afghanistan. “In a country where more than half of the population don’t have anything to eat, the one [group] that’s most hit is women.”
Afghan women have also faced soaring rates of domestic and sexual violence, including at the hands of the Taliban. Women detained by the Taliban have reported being raped and tortured in prison.
The 125 nations party to the International Criminal Court are bound by law to detain the Taliban leaders if they set foot on their soil, though the likelihood of an arrest remains slim. Akhundzada and Haqqani could simply refrain from traveling to countries that recognize the Court’s authority or avoid leaving Afghanistan entirely.
In a first for international law, the court also accused the two Taliban leaders of persecuting “other persons non-conforming with the Taliban’s policy on gender, gender identity or expression.”
The case is “the first international criminal proceedings involving targeting of LGBTQI+ individuals, individuals who do not conform to the gender expectations of an autocratic regime,” said Beth Van Schaack, the United States Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice during the Biden administration. “It’s a huge step from the perspective of international criminal justice, in terms of opening up a line of prosecution and potentially creating a really important precedent.”
Afghanistan’s Taliban government remains isolated from much of the world, which has yet to recognize the Taliban as the legitimate ruling power in the country. Russia became the first country to diplomatically recognize the regime on Thursday.
Though the specific contents of the warrants remain sealed, the proceedings likely draw on the work of newsrooms and civil society groups who collected testimony from women in Afghanistan. Many of these organizations, including Zan Times, have been hit hard by the Trump administration’s funding cuts. The White House is looking to further reduce financial support for war crimes investigations, Reuters reported last month.
We work with journalists on the ground to be “able to bring those violations to the light,” Nader said. “However, with lack of funding, that work has become much more difficult for us to do. They’re creating a perfect situation for the Taliban to commit crime.”
ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over persecution of women, girls
Despite rising humanitarian needs, the reduction in aid has left millions of Afghan families facing severe economic and humanitarian challenges.
The World Food Programme (WFP) has once again raised concerns about the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Afghanistan.
The UN-affiliated organization states that this summer, ten million people in Afghanistan are in urgent need of food assistance; however, due to funding shortages, it can only support one million of them.
According to economic experts, the solution to reducing poverty in Afghanistan lies in fostering active relations with neighboring countries and making effective use of the country’s natural resources.
Abdul Zahoor Modabber, an economic affairs analyst, said: “To curb poverty, we must consider two key strategies: first, maintaining constructive and effective international relations; and second, utilizing both renewable and non-renewable natural and human resources efficiently. Therefore, with proper management, these resources must be used wisely and effectively.”
Following recent political developments, Afghanistan now tops the list of countries over which the global community has expressed deep humanitarian concerns.
Despite rising humanitarian needs, the reduction in aid has left millions of Afghan families facing severe economic and humanitarian challenges.
Mohammad Javid, a resident of Kabul, said: “If there were aid, we could manage. Even without work, we somehow got by. But when there is work, we don’t need aid. There are plenty of street carts, and they distribute cards to people but we don’t have any connections to get one.”
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Economy says it has launched programs to fight poverty and unemployment, which, if implemented, could help improve the overall situation.
Abdul Rahman Habib, spokesperson for the Ministry of Economy, stated: “Simply distributing food aid cannot fully address the needs of our people. Instead, lifting economic sanctions and international support for programs that strengthen families, create jobs, and enhance purchasing power can lead to real economic improvement.”
Unemployment, reduced foreign aid, natural disasters, and lack of access to adequate health and education services are among the key drivers of poverty and malnutrition in Afghanistan challenges that have forced families into displacement and pushed children into hard labor.
WFP Warns: 10 Million Afghans Face Hunger, Only 1 Million Can Be Helped
Russia, maintaining formal relations with the interim Afghan government, criticized the Western-centric approach to resolving Afghanistan’s issues.
The Islamic Emirate’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has announced that it will review the recently adopted UN General Assembly resolution on Afghanistan in accordance with Islamic principles and national interests. While acknowledging that some humanitarian realities in Afghanistan were overlooked, the Ministry emphasized its commitment to assessing the resolution’s recommendations within the framework of Islamic guidelines and national priorities.
In response to the resolution, Zia Ahmad Takal, head of public relations at the Ministry, said: “Despite this, the Islamic Emirate will evaluate the stated demands and suggestions in this resolution within the framework of the guidance of the noble religion of Islam and national interests, and will determine areas where cooperation is possible.”
The resolution, passed with 116 votes in favor, 2 against (the United States and Israel), and 12 abstentions (including Russia, China, India, and Iran), calls on Afghanistan’s ruling authorities to reverse oppressive policies against women and girls and to dismantle terrorist organizations operating within the country.
Russia, maintaining formal relations with the interim Afghan government, criticized the Western-centric approach to resolving Afghanistan’s issues and emphasized constructive engagement with the interim authorities.
“We are disappointed by the open refusal of some Western colleagues to even mention the role of certain regional mechanisms in the section on regional cooperation that was created specifically for this purpose, even though these mechanisms remain the only platform for regional interaction on a wide range of issues,” said Anna Evstigneeva, Russia’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN.
China reiterated its support for the interim government while encouraging the formation of an inclusive political structure. Geng Shuang, China’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, stated: “We encourage the interim government of Afghanistan to establish an inclusive political structure and a moderate administration, emphasizing dialogue and consultation to achieve national reconciliation and internal unity.”
Qatar and Saudi Arabia also emphasized in the UN General Assembly the importance of coordinated international efforts on Afghanistan and support for political stability in the country.
Sheikha Alya Ahmed bin Saif Al-Thani, Qatar’s Representative to the UN, said: “The State of Qatar stresses the importance of solidarity and joint international efforts so that the people of Afghanistan can build a country governed by peace, stability, and development.”
Abdulaziz Al-Wasel, Saudi Arabia’s Permanent Representative to the UN, also said: “Saudi Arabia reaffirms its commitment to continue supporting political, humanitarian, and developmental efforts aimed at stabilizing Afghanistan and again urges the international community not to abandon Afghanistan.”
On the other hand, the European Union and Germany have called for the appointment of a UN Special Envoy for Afghanistan and support for the UN-led Doha process.
The United States, which has yet to take a clear stance on the caretaker government, appears dissatisfied with the ongoing efforts to resolve Afghan issues.
Stavros Lambrinidis, EU Representative to the UN, said: “The EU also calls for the appointment of a UN Special Envoy for Afghanistan, in line with UNSC resolution 2721, to facilitate international coordination, promote a peaceful resolution to the conflict, and support the implementation of the Comprehensive Approach roadmap.”
Antje Leendertse, Germany’s UN Representative, said: “As many others, Germany acknowledges that there is no alternative to engagement with the Taliban, and we will continue to actively contribute to the UN-led Doha process.”
“With regard to international cooperation and the UN-led Doha process, it too has yielded few sustainable results. The United States is deeply skeptical about the Taliban’s willingness to participate in good faith. When they are willing to engage, it is only on their terms and to the detriment of our interests,” said Jonathan Shrier, U.S. Representative to the UN Economic and Social Council.
The UN General Assembly’s discussion on Afghanistan once again highlighted that nearly four years on, the international community has not reached a comprehensive agreement on the issue. The outcomes of future meetings on Afghanistan remain to be seen.
UN Resolution on Afghanistan: Islamic Emirate and Global Reactions
UN Secretary-General’s spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, emphasized that the UN’s position on the issue remains unchanged.
The United Nations has said that Russia’s recognition of the caretaker government in Afghanistan is a bilateral matter between Kabul and Moscow.
UN Secretary-General’s spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, emphasized that the UN’s position on the issue remains unchanged.
Stéphane Dujarric said: “The issue of recognition is a bilateral issue between those who recognize each other. For ourselves, our work in Afghanistan remains unchanged as mandated by the Security Council.”
Political analysts believe that if the caretaker government adheres to the legitimate demands of the international community, it could lead to its recognition even by European countries.
Sayed Ebadullah Sadiq, a political analyst, said: “The Islamic Emirate must understand what the international community expects from them and also pay attention to the rights of all Afghans, including both women and men.”
Another political analyst, Moeen Gul Samkani, said: “From a diplomatic perspective, it is the right path, but based on their intentions, it seems the West still does not want to take such action. The Islamic Emirate must do more to eventually engage in dialogue with countries that are unwilling or have taken opposing stances.”
This comes as Russia last week became the first country to officially recognize the Islamic Emirate.
Recognition of the Islamic Emirate a Bilateral Matter: UN
Judges say Taliban officials have ‘severely deprived’ girls and women of human rights, including education.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for two top Taliban leaders in Afghanistan on charges of abuses against women and girls.
ICC judges on Tuesday said there were “reasonable grounds” to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Haibatullah Akhunzada and Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution.
“While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,” the court said in a statement.
The Taliban has “severely deprived” girls and women of the rights to education, privacy, family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said.
“In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban’s policy on gender,” the court added.
The Taliban was quick to reject the warrants as “baseless rhetoric”, saying that it does not recognise the ICC’s authority and invoking the court’s failure to protect the “hundreds of women and children being killed daily” in Gaza.
“The leadership and officials of the Islamic Emirate have established unparalleled justice in Afghanistan based on the sacred laws of Islamic Sharia,” Zabihullah Mujahid, a spokesperson for the Taliban government, said in a statement.
Late in 2022, several Muslim-majority countries – including Turkiye, Saudi Arabia and Qatar – condemned the Taliban’s decision to restrict education for women.
The ICC said on Tuesday that the alleged crimes were committed from August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power after the withdrawal of United States forces, and continued until at least January 20 of this year.
The court’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, sought the warrants in January, saying that “Afghan women and girls as well as the LGBTQI+ community are facing an unprecedented, unconscionable and ongoing persecution by the Taliban”.
Last year, the United Nations accused the Taliban government of barring at least 1.4 million girls from their right to an education during its time in power.
Taking into account the number of girls not going to school before the group came to power, the UN said 80 percent of Afghan school-age girls – a total of 2.5 million – were being denied their right to an education.
Authorities also imposed restrictions on women working for nongovernmental groups and other jobs.
Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks and gyms as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone.
A “vice and virtue” law announced a year ago ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be “concealed” outside the home.
The rights groups Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (HRW) welcomed the ICC warrants on Tuesday.
“The announcement is an important development that gives hope, inside and outside the country, to Afghan women, girls, as well as those persecuted on the basis of gender identity or expression,” Amnesty International chief Agnes Callamard said in a statement.
“This is a crucial step to hold accountable all those allegedly responsible for the gender-based deprivation of fundamental rights to education, to free movement and free expression, to private and family life, to free assembly, and to physical integrity and autonomy.”
For its part, HRW called on the international community to “fully back the ICC in its critical work in Afghanistan and globally, including through concerted efforts to enforce the court’s warrants”.
Last year, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over war crime charges in Gaza, including using starvation as a weapon of war.
But several Western members of the court have refused to commit to enforcing the warrants. Earlier this year, Poland said it would allow Netanyahu to visit the country, and Hungary hosted the Israeli prime minister and withdrew from the Rome Statute that established the ICC.
For its part, the US – which is not a member of the court – imposed sanctions on ICC officials over the prosecution of Netanyahu.
The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world’s worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own, and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants.
Source: Al Jazeera and news agencies
ICC issues warrants for Taliban leaders over alleged persecution of women
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution Monday over U.S. objections calling on Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers to reverse their worsening oppression of women and girls and eliminate all terrorist organizations.
The 11-page resolution also emphasizes “the importance of creating opportunities for economic recovery, development and prosperity in Afghanistan,” and urges donors to address the country’s dire humanitarian and economic crisis.
The resolution is not legally binding but is seen as a reflection of world opinion. The vote was 116 in favor, with two — the United States and close ally Israel — opposed and 12 abstentions, including Russia, China, India and Iran.
Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade. Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban’s government.
Germany’s U.N. Ambassador Antje Leendertse, whose country sponsored the resolution, told the assembly before the vote that her country and many others remain gravely concerned about the dire human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the Taliban’s “near-total erasure” of the rights of women and girls.
The core message of the resolution, she said, is to tell Afghan mothers holding sick and underfed children or mourning victims of terrorist attacks, as well as the millions of Afghan women and girls locked up at home, that they have not been forgotten.
U.S. minister-counselor Jonathan Shrier was critical of the resolution, which he said rewards “the Taliban’s failure with more engagement and more resources.” He said the Trump administration doubts they will ever pursue policies “in accordance with the expectations of the international community.”
“For decades we shouldered the burden of supporting the Afghan people with time, money and, most important, American lives,” he said. “It is the time for the Taliban to step up. The United States will no longer enable their heinous behavior.”
Last month, the Trump administration banned Afghans hoping to resettle in the U.S. permanently and those seeking to come temporarily, with exceptions.
The resolution expresses appreciation to governments hosting Afghan refugees, singling out the two countries that have taken the most: Iran and Pakistan. Shrier also objected to this, accusing Iran of executing Afghans “at an alarming rate without due process” and forcibly conscripting Afghans into its militias.
While the resolution notes improvements in Afghanistan’s overall security situation, it reiterates concern about attacks by al-Qaida and Islamic State militants and their affiliates. It calls upon Afghanistan “to take active measures to tackle, dismantle and eliminate all terrorist organizations equally and without discrimination.”
The General Assembly also encouraged U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to appoint a coordinator to facilitate “a more coherent, coordinated and structured approach” to its international engagements on Afghanistan.
UN adopts resolution on Afghanistan’s Taliban rule over US objections
The United Nations says aid workers are still in a “race against time” to remove rubble and rebuild after the devastating earthquake struck eastern Afghanistan last month, killing at least 2,200 people and cutting off remote areas.
The 6.0-magnitude quake on Aug. 31 was shallow, destroying or causing extensive damage to low-rise buildings in the mountainous region. It hit late at night, and homes — mostly made of mud, wood, or rocks — collapsed instantly, becoming death traps.
Satellite data shows that about 40,500 truckloads of debris still needs to be cleared from affected areas in several provinces, the United Nations Development Program said Wednesday. Entire communities have been upended and families are sleeping in the open, it added.
The quake’s epicenter was in remote and rugged Kunar province, challenging rescue and relief efforts by the Taliban government and humanitarian groups. Authorities deployed helicopters or airdropped army commandos to evacuate survivors. Aid workers walked for hours on foot to reach isolated communities.
“This is a race against time,” said Devanand Ramiah, from the UNDP’s Crisis Bureau. “Debris removal and reconstruction operations must start safely and swiftly.”
People’s main demands were the reconstruction of houses and water supplies, according to a spokesman for a Taliban government committee tasked with helping survivors, Zia ur Rahman Speenghar.
People were getting assistance in cash, food, tents, beds, and other necessities, Speenghar said Thursday. Three new roads were under construction in the Dewagal Valley, and roads would be built to areas where there previously were none.
“Various countries and organizations have offered assistance in the construction of houses but that takes time. After the second round of assistance, work will begin on the third round, which is considering what kind of houses can be built here,” the spokesman said.
Afghanistan is facing a “perfect storm” of crises, including natural disasters like the recent earthquake, said Roza Otunbayeva, who leads the U.N. mission to the country.