What is the background to calls for Afghanistan cricket boycott?

England will play Afghanistan in the Champions Trophy on Wednesday, 26 February in Pakistan.

It is a fixture that has caused plenty of controversy in the build-up, with some saying Jos Buttler’s side should boycott the match in response to the Taliban’s actions in Afghanistan.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is among those to have had their say. BBC Sport looks at the background and both sides of the debate.

What is the background?

The issue has come to light following the Tailban’s assault on women’s rights in Afghanistan.

Female participation in sport has effectively been outlawed since the group returned to power in 2021.

Women were banned from universities, parks and sports. The Taliban raided the homes of female athletes and many women’s cricketers fled Afghanistan for their safety.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) requires its full members, of which Afghanistan is one, to have a national women’s team, but the men’s team has retained its Test status, reached the semi-finals of the T20 World Cup last year and qualified for the latest global tournament, the Champions Trophy.

In January, a cross-party letter, signed by nearly 200 UK politicians, was sent to the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) calling for England to refuse to play the match.

In response, the ECB called for unified action led by the ICC.

ECB chief executive Richard Gould wrote to the global governing body calling for more action over what he called “gender apartheid”.

He stopped short of asking for a boycott but did ask the ICC to place an “immediate condition” on Afghanistan’s full member status to provide women’s cricket by a certain date.

England have played Afghanistan twice since the Taliban takeover – both at world events run by the ICC. They have not scheduled any bilateral series, which are organised by national cricket boards, against them.

As it stands this match will go ahead.

What do those in favour of a boycott say?

The original letter was written by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, and signed by others including Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, and former Labour leaders Jeremy Corbyn and Lord Kinnock.

It urged England to boycott the match to “send a clear signal” that “such grotesque abuses will not be tolerated”.

“The power lies in the team,” said Antoniazzi – the MP for Gower. “How big is England cricket? It’s huge.

“They have a huge standing in the world of sport and they do have an influence, and I want them to realise that that influence is what they should use to make a difference.”

South Africa, another team involved in the Champions Trophy, were banned from competing in sport because of apartheid in the late 20th Century.

South Africa are in Group B with Afghanistan, Australia and England. The Proteas will face Afghanistan on Friday, 21 February in Pakistan.

“Cricket South Africa, the federations of other countries and the ICC will have to think carefully about the message the sport of cricket wishes to send the world, and especially the women in sports,” said South Africa sports minister Gayton McKenzie.

“If it was my decision, then it certainly would not happen.”

What do others say and why are Afghanistan’s men allowed to compete?

Starmer also called for unified action but stopped short of supporting a boycott, despite calls from within his party.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy later said the game should go ahead, adding boycotts are “counterproductive”, while England captain Buttler said in January he does not think a boycott is “the way to go about it”.

“They deny sports fans the opportunity they love and they can very much penalise the athletes and sportspeople who work very, very hard to reach the top of their game,” Nandy told the BBC in January.

Criticism of the ICC’s position has continued. Its stance is that current men’s players should not be punished for Afghanistan government policy.

It also wants to use its position and the sport of cricket to influence change in the country.

The ICC set up a working group after the Taliban regained power to tackle the issue and the group has met with representatives of the government.

But the group and the ICC as a whole has also been widely criticised.

A group of Afghan women’s cricketers who fled to Australia say the ICC has done “nothing” for them.

They took part in an exhibition match in Melbourne last month and want to be recognised as a refugee team.

Have there been other boycotts in sport?

Boycotts in sport, and cricket, are not new.

The most famous example is the banning of South Africa but, at the height of the Cold War, the United States also led a boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow in protest of the Soviet War in Afghanistan.

In 2003, England were encouraged by the UK government not to travel to Zimbabwe for a World Cup match because of Robert Mugabe’s ruling regime.

In the end they did not travel because of security concerns and forfeited the match, which played a part in their elimination.

What is the background to calls for Afghanistan cricket boycott?
read more

UN raises concerns over continued deportation of Afghan refugees from Pakistan

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) have expressed concern over Pakistan’s plan for the mass expulsion of Afghan refugees and have called for clarification regarding the deportation of these migrants.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, February 6, 2025, the organizations urged Pakistan to clarify the process of expelling Afghan migrants and refugees from the country.

The statement from the UNHCR and IOM highlighted that since the beginning of January 2025, there has been an increase in the arrest of Afghan citizens in Islamabad and Rawalpindi, with some Afghans holding residence permits also being detained.

Last week, Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, announced a multi-phase plan for the expulsion of Afghan migrants, including both legal refugees and those with residence permits, as well as undocumented migrants and those awaiting resettlement in the United States or European countries.

Following the suspension of foreign aid from the United States and the resettlement of Afghan refugees, Reuters reported, citing a refugee advocacy group and a U.S. official, that a decision by Donald Trump led to the suspension of flights for more than 40,000 Afghan citizens holding Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs).

However, some Afghan migrants in Pakistan have criticized this action by the Trump administration and have called for international community support.

According to Pakistani officials, there are currently 1.45 million Afghan migrants living legally in the country, and their residence permits have been extended until June.

The situation surrounding the expulsion of Afghan migrants in Pakistan raises significant concerns about the humanitarian impact of such a decision. Given the large number of Afghan migrants currently residing in Pakistan, the international community must play an active role in supporting both Pakistan and Afghanistan to ensure that the rights and safety of these migrants are protected.

Furthermore, there needs to be clear communication and cooperation between Pakistan, Afghanistan, and international organizations to address the challenges of migration and refugee protection. This situation serves as a reminder of the critical importance of upholding international human rights standards and providing adequate assistance to vulnerable populations displaced by conflict.

UN raises concerns over continued deportation of Afghan refugees from Pakistan
read more

Richard Bennett calls for release of Radio Begum staff in Afghanistan

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Afghanistan has expressed deep concern over the detention of two Radio Begum employees and called for their immediate release.

Richard Bennett also urged for an end to the harassment and arbitrary detention of journalists by the Taliban. Bennett emphasized the importance of releasing the Radio Begum employees and condemned the harassment and arbitrary detentions of journalists and media workers, stating that such actions have “devastated the civic space in Afghanistan.”

Radio Begum was shut down on Tuesday by the Taliban’s Ministry of Information and Culture, citing multiple charges, including airing programs for an overseas television network and “violating the terms and conditions of its license.”

Radio Begum also reported the confiscation of some of its equipment and stated that two of its employees had been arrested.

The closure of Radio Begum and the detention of its staff have sparked widespread reactions, with international organizations advocating for the unconditional release of the employees and the reversal of the ban on the radio station, which primarily caters to women.

The continued crackdown on independent media in Afghanistan has drawn significant global attention. This situation underscores the growing concerns about press freedom and the suppression of women’s voices in the country.

As the international community pressures the Taliban to uphold basic human rights, the case of Radio Begum serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by journalists and media organizations striving to operate in Afghanistan.

Richard Bennett calls for release of Radio Begum staff in Afghanistan
read more

UNAMA and RSF Demand Immediate Release of Begum Radio Staff

Meanwhile, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) also criticized the suspension of Begum Radio and called for the release of its two detained employees.

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has reacted to the closure of Begum Radio, stating that free media is essential for the progress and development of society.

In a statement, UNAMA called for the immediate release of journalists who have been detained for exercising their right to freedom of expression, emphasizing that independent media plays a crucial role in societal growth and development.

UNAMA’s statement reads: “UNAMA is concerned about the arrest in Kabul, Afghanistan yesterday of two Radio Begum staff, whose whereabouts are unknown. UNAMA calls for the release of persons detained for exercising their right to freedom of expression. Free media is essential for society to thrive.”

Afghan journalist Shah Agha Sadat commented: “In general, Afghan journalists working under these difficult conditions must adhere to the regulations of the Ministry of Information and Culture to avoid arbitrary arrests and other challenges.”

Meanwhile, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) also criticized the suspension of Begum Radio and called for the release of its two detained employees.

RSF stated: ” Reporters Without Borders (RSF) calls for the immediate release of the station’s employees and for the ban to be immediately lifted.”

Another journalist, Sahibuddin Samim, added: “Over the past three years, there has been no law governing the media. A legal framework must be established for journalists to operate freely. Furthermore, the government is responsible for ensuring access to information.”

So far, the Islamic Emirate has not commented on the arrest of the two Begum Radio employees.

The Ministry of Information and Culture of Afghanistan has cited ‘broadcast violations’ and the sharing of content with foreign-based TV stations as reasons for suspending Begum Radio’s operations. The ministry stated that the outlet failed to comply with broadcasting license regulations and aired content contrary to Islamic principles.

Spokesperson Khabib Ghufran of the Ministry of Information and Culture stated: “During the presence of the ministry’s delegation, this media outlet was broadcasting live for foreign media. Eventually, it was decided that their case—including the men’s section named ‘Jawan Radio’ and the women’s section named ‘Begum’—would be submitted to the court along with the relevant documents. They will remain closed until a final decision is made.”

Begum Radio’s operations were suspended on Tuesday in Kabul by the Ministry of Information and Culture.

UNAMA and RSF Demand Immediate Release of Begum Radio Staff
read more

Islamic Emirate Rejects Sopko’s Claims of Interference in Intl Aid

Speaking to Fox News, Sopko stressed that the US does not have strict oversight over the aid, and this situation will continue.

The Islamic Emirate has rejected the statements of the former US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) John Sopko, who claimed that the Emirate interferes in international aid.

The technical deputy minister of the Ministry of Economy, Abdul Latif Nazari, told TOLOnews that international organizations’ aid in Afghanistan is distributed transparently and under strict supervision.

Abdul Latif Nazari, the technical deputy minister of the Ministry of Economy, stated: “The Ministry of Economy of the Islamic Emirate completely rejects the recent statements of John Sopko, the former US Special Inspector. During the rule of the Islamic Emirate, all international aid has been transparent and supervised. The Ministry of Economy has made every effort to facilitate international aid and has not interfered in the process.”

“All efforts must be made to ensure that aid continues regularly and is provided in a manner that allows the Islamic Emirate to engage with the international community and prove that aid has reached specific provinces and regions with documented statistics. Hopefully, these aid programs will not be halted,” said Abdul Basir Turki, an economic analyst.

John Sopko, the former US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, claimed that a “sizeable’ portion of the aid funds intended for Afghanistan, paid by American taxpayers, had ended up in the pockets of the “Taliban.”

Speaking to Fox News, Sopko stressed that the US does not have strict oversight over the aid, and this situation will continue.

He said: “We know a sizable amount went into the pockets of the Taliban, and just so you know I’m no longer with the government, but the final report we issued and I signed off on before my departure indicated that. We know it’s going to continue because unfortunately we have nobody on the ground and the money is going through the UN, World Food organization and other international organizations and we don’t really have good oversight.”

Sopko also added that for the past twenty years, all US institutions have failed to properly allocate funds in Afghanistan.

 

Islamic Emirate Rejects Sopko’s Claims of Interference in Intl Aid
read more

Islamic Emirate Denies Issuance of Arrest Warrant for Abbas Stanikzai

Speaking to the BBC, Mujahid stated that Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai had traveled to Dubai to visit his family.

Zabihullah Mujahid, the spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, has denied reports regarding the issuance of an arrest warrant for the deputy foreign minister.

Speaking to the BBC, Mujahid stated that Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai had traveled to Dubai to visit his family.

He said: “Stanikzai Sahib frequently travels to Dubai. Part of his family resides there, and he has lived there in the past. He is currently visiting Dubai and will return to resume his duties.”

Zabihullah Mujahid described recent reports of internal disputes among Islamic Emirate officials as a propaganda campaign.

He also urged the United States to abandon its wartime strategy towards Afghanistan and adopt an approach based on engagement.

Additionally, Mujahid emphasized the lifting of sanctions on Islamic Emirate officials and Afghanistan’s frozen assets.

He stated: “The rights of the Afghan people have been usurped, and certain political obstacles at the global level must be removed, as they are not in anyone’s interest. The strategy pursued during the war must be replaced with a strategy of engagement.”

Mohammad Emal Dostyar, a university professor, remarked: “Not only should we improve our relations with the United States, which is one of the world’s major powers, but we must also establish diplomatic channels with other countries, as this is essential.”

Previously, the Islamic Emirate had dismissed US President Trump’s claims regarding the potential recapture of Bagram Air Base and the abandoned military equipment as baseless.

Islamic Emirate Denies Issuance of Arrest Warrant for Abbas Stanikzai
read more

Taliban-Pakistan Border Tensions Escalate As Group Orders Evacuation Of Residents

Volant Media UK Limited

Afghanistan International

 

The Taliban has instructed residents in the border areas of Bahram Chah district, Helmand province, to evacuate due to the risk of intensified clashes between Taliban forces and Pakistani border guards, local sources have reported.

Sporadic fighting between the two sides has reportedly been ongoing for the past two days along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. According to a local resident, both Taliban forces and Pakistani border guards have reinforced their positions in the area, with the Taliban urging civilians to leave to prevent casualties in the event of heavy fighting.

Videos shared by local residents with Afghanistan International show Taliban outposts in the region flying the group’s white flags. Reports also indicate that the Taliban has blocked certain roads to the public, raising concerns about the potential for a full-scale conflict.

Neither the Taliban nor Pakistani authorities have issued official statements regarding the ongoing dispute over the border outpost. However, Taliban security sources and local residents confirmed that shooting erupted between Pakistani forces and Taliban fighters on Monday night.

To bolster their presence, the Taliban has deployed reinforcements from the 205th Corps of Kandahar and Helmand to the region on Tuesday, signalling heightened tensions.

Bahram Chah, a notorious hub for drug trafficking, has historically played a significant role in financing the Taliban. During their insurgency against the former Afghan government, the group relied heavily on revenue from the drug trade to fund its operations.

Last week, farmers and drug traffickers in the district staged protests, alleging that the Taliban intended not only to impose taxes on them but also to destroy their opium poppy fields, a move that could disrupt the region’s illicit economy.

 

Taliban-Pakistan Border Tensions Escalate As Group Orders Evacuation Of Residents
read more

Central Asia, EU Discuss Afghanistan’s Challenges, Assistance Strategies

The human rights situation and security challenges in Afghanistan were among the key topics discussed in the meeting.

The sixth Meeting of the Special Representatives and Envoys of Central Asian States and the EU for Afghanistan was held in the capital of Tajikistan. 

This meeting focused on the approach of Central Asian countries and the European Union in providing assistance to Afghanistan.

The human rights situation and security challenges in Afghanistan were among the key topics discussed in the meeting.

The Tajikistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated regarding the meeting: The participants in the meeting exchanged views on the socio-economic and political developments in Afghanistan since the last meeting in February 2024, as well as on the approaches of the Central Asian countries and the EU to assisting Afghanistan. The participants in the meeting also focused on the Human rights situation, especially for women and girls, in Afghanistan and the security challenges and threats.”

Meanwhile, the Islamic Emirate called on regional countries to increase their cooperation for Afghanistan’s progress and stability.

Deputy spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate, Hamdullah Fitrat, told TOLOnews: “There is now peace and stability in Afghanistan, and efforts for economic prosperity are ongoing. In this process, regional countries should cooperate with us to ensure lasting regional stability.”

“The more international and regional meetings related to Afghanistan take place, the more effective they will be—provided that Afghanistan has a representative present at these meetings,” said Fazl Rahman Orya, a political analyst.

In the previous meeting, held in the capital of Kyrgyzstan, topics such as long-term peace and stability strategies for Afghanistan and the issue of narcotics were discussed.

Central Asia, EU Discuss Afghanistan’s Challenges, Assistance Strategies
read more

UNFPA: US Aid Cuts May Trigger Maternal Health Crisis in Afghanistan

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 90-day suspension of aid is intended for a thorough review of the programs.

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has warned that the suspension of aid could result in 1,200 additional maternal deaths and 109,000 unintended pregnancies in Afghanistan between 2025 and 2028.

Pio Smith, UNFPA’s Regional Director for Asia and the Pacific, expressed concern over the US aid cuts, stating that this decision will have catastrophic consequences in Afghanistan.

“On 24 January, the US Administration paused nearly all US foreign aid programme pending a 90 days review, in response, UNFPA has suspended services funded by US grants that provide a lifeline for women and girls in crises, including in south Asia, If I just take the example of Afghanistan, between 2025 and 2028 we estimate that the absence of U.S. support will result in 1,200 additional maternal deaths and 109,000 additional unintended pregnancies,” Smith said.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 90-day suspension of aid is intended for a thorough review of the programs. He assured that effective and reasonable aid would continue. Rubio pointed out that some organizations, particularly the US Agency for International Development (USAID), had refused to provide information.

“In some cases, with USAID, 10, 12, 13 percent, maybe less of the money was actually reaching the recipient and the rest was going into the overhead and the bureaucracy.  This isn’t my money. This is taxpayer money.  So, we’re not going to eliminate foreign aid.  We’re going to have foreign aid that makes sense. We’re going to have foreign aid that works.  We’re going to have foreign aid that furthers the national interest. We’re going to have foreign aid that benefits our trusted partners and our allies,” Robio added.

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has also reported that 89% of Afghan families require humanitarian support.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Economy of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan emphasized that humanitarian aid should remain separate from political issues.

Abdul Latif Nazari, the ministry’s technical deputy, told TOLOnews: “We believe that humanitarian aid must remain humanitarian, and it should be kept separate from political matters.”

The USAID website announced that, except for essential staff, its employees worldwide would be placed on administrative leave starting Friday. The New York Times reported that USAID has approximately 10,000 employees globally.

UNFPA: US Aid Cuts May Trigger Maternal Health Crisis in Afghanistan
read more

Uzbekistan Transfers Afghan Helicopters to US, Sparking Reactions

Reports indicate that the transfer of these helicopters was announced in a ceremony at the Uzbek embassy in Washington.

According to reports from Uzbek media, Uzbekistan has handed over seven helicopters, which were transferred to Uzbekistan during the fall of Afghanistan’s previous government, to the United States.

Reports indicate that the transfer of these helicopters was announced in a ceremony at the Uzbek embassy in Washington.

“These aircraft were not aggressors. They were transferred by Afghans. Uzbekistan is a friendly, neighboring, and Muslim country that should have cooperated in good faith and handed over the aircraft to us,” said Kamran Aman, a military affairs expert.

Although the Islamic Emirate has not yet responded to this issue, it had previously requested that Uzbekistan return the helicopters to Afghanistan based on good neighborly relations. The Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Emirate had stated that the helicopters belong to Afghans and that they would take all possible measures to reclaim them.

Fasihuddin Fitrat, the Chief of Staff of the Ministry of Defense, had said: “They should not accept such an act where someone’s right is given to another. These aircraft belong to Afghanistan and are Afghanistan’s right. Giving these aircraft to others is unacceptable to us.”

After the fall of the previous government, a total of 46 Afghan military aircraft and helicopters were transferred to Uzbekistan.

The spokesperson for the Ministry of Defense had also stated that before the Islamic Emirate took control, there were 164 military aircraft in Afghanistan, of which 81 remain today.

Uzbekistan Transfers Afghan Helicopters to US, Sparking Reactions
read more