The Taliban have no legal right to multibillion dollar Afghan fund, says US watchdog

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

The watchdog for U.S. assistance to Afghanistan said the Taliban have no legal right to billions of dollars in funding set aside for the country because they are not recognized as its government and are under sanctions.

In its latest report issued Friday, the office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, or SIGAR, also said President Donald Trump’s administration and Congress may want to examine returning nearly $4 billion earmarked for Afghanistan to the “custody and control” of the U.S. government.

In 2022, the U.S. transferred $3.5 billion in Afghan central bank assets previously frozen in America to the Swiss-based Fund for the Afghan People. The fund has grown to nearly $4 billion since then, according to the inspector general.

Although no payments benefiting Afghans have been made, the fund is aimed at protecting and stabilizing the economy on their behalf.

“The Taliban want these funds even though they have no legal right to them since they are not recognized by the United States as the government of Afghanistan, are on the U.S. Specially Designated Global Terrorist list, and are under U.S. and U.N. sanctions,” the report said.

Responding to the report Saturday, the Afghan Economy Ministry said more than $9 billion of Afghanistan’s foreign exchange reserves had been frozen and warned that any U.S. action regarding the allocation, use or transfer of these reserves was unacceptable.

It urged the international community to return the money to the central bank to ensure the country’s stability.

The ministry also said that U.S. expenditure had made no significant impact on the Afghan economy.

The SIGAR report follows Trump’s decision to freeze foreign aid for 90 days pending reviews to determine whether projects align with his policy goals.

According to the report, the U.S. has spent nearly $3.71 billion in Afghanistan since withdrawing from the country in 2021. Most of that has gone to U.N. agencies.

Another $1.2 billion remains available in the pipeline for possible disbursement, the report said.

U.S. humanitarian assistance may have “staved off famine” in the face of economic collapse, but it has not dissuaded the Taliban from taking Americans hostagedismantling the rights of women and girls, censoring the media, allowing the country to become a “terrorist safe haven,” and targeting former Afghan government officials, added the watchdog.

The U.S. remains the largest donor to Afghanistan, but the report said a lot of the money is taxed or diverted.

“The further the cash gets away from the source, the less transparency there is,” Chris Borgeson, the deputy inspector general for audits and inspections at the watchdog, told The Associated Press last August.

Meanwhile, authorities in Afghanistan on Saturday clarified the circumstances behind their takeover of the country’s only luxury hotel.

The General Directorate of State-Owned Corporations said an international hotel brand, Serena, had signed an agreement in 2003 with the Tourism Promotion Services Company for Afghanistan. This contract was terminated by the Emirates Hotel Company last December. The hotel had continued its operations as usual since then.

“To further standardize its services, the Emirates Hotels Company has signed an agreement with an international company that has extensive experience in the hospitality industry,” said the directorate on its official X account. “This international company will now manage and operate the Kabul Hotel’s services in a professional and standardized manner.”

The name of the international company was not mentioned.

 

The Taliban have no legal right to multibillion dollar Afghan fund, says US watchdog
read more

US Senator Introduces Bill to Restrict Aid to Afghanistan Through UN

Some economic experts believe that the US should not politicize its aid to Afghanistan.

US Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) has introduced a bill to prevent the Islamic Emirate from accessing American funds through the United Nations.

According to this bill, US aid sent via the UN will be subject to the US State Department’s guarantee that Washington’s cash assistance will not be included in UN humanitarian shipments to Afghanistan.

Senator Shelley Moore Capito stated: “the bill prohibits US contributions to the UN for assistance to Afghanistan until the State Department provides certification to Congress that: (1) no US funds are included in UN cash shipments into Afghanistan; and (2) no Specially Designated Global Terrorist Organization or Foreign Terrorist Organization will receive any funds via such contributions.”

“The Islamic Emirate must engage not only based on religious principles but also in accordance with global and regional norms in political and economic sectors. Otherwise, the humanitarian crisis will worsen further,” said Silab Samandar, an economic analyst.

Despite ongoing concerns about reduced aid and economic challenges, the Ministry of Economy asserts that the country’s economic situation is under control and that Afghanistan will not face serious problems if aid is cut off.

Abdul Latif Nazari, the deputy minister of economy, stated: “The approval of a new bill by a US senator to exert more pressure on the Afghan people cannot slow our economic progress. The country’s economic situation remains stable, exports and imports continue without issue, and national revenues are transparently deposited into the state treasury.”

Some economic experts believe that the US should not politicize its aid to Afghanistan.

“In all countries, when a crisis arises and people face economic hardship, it is the responsibility of other nations to provide assistance. However, this aid should not be politicized. If humanitarian aid reaches ordinary people and some attempt to portray it as political, they are, in fact, violating human rights,” said Abdul Nasir Reshtya, an economic analyst.

Previously, US President Donald Trump stated that the US provides billions of dollars in annual aid to Afghanistan and that these funds should be given on condition that US equipment now held by the Islamic Emirate be given back to the US.

US Senator Introduces Bill to Restrict Aid to Afghanistan Through UN
read more

Trump: Bagram Base Now Under China’s Control

However, US policy towards Afghanistan and its future relationship with the interim government remain uncertain.

Donald Trump, former US president, once again emphasized the significance of Bagram Airbase for the United States, stating that the strategic airbase in Afghanistan is now under China’s control.

Trump highlighted that Bagram’s proximity to China makes it crucial for the US. He stated: “I was getting out, but I was going to keep Bagram. Right now, China has Bagram. I was going to keep one of the biggest airbases in the world, they left it.”

This is not the first time Trump has stressed the importance of Bagram Airbase for the US. Previously, during his election campaigns, he had criticized the American withdrawal from Afghanistan and pledged that if re-elected, he would reclaim the base.

However, US policy towards Afghanistan and its future relationship with the interim government remain uncertain.

Mohammad Ameen Karim, a political analyst, told TOLOnews: “Their priority is the release of three American citizens from Afghanistan, but reclaiming Bagram Airbase is nothing more than a dream, an illusion, and madness. It will never happen again.”

The Islamic Emirate has not commented on Trump’s recent remarks. However, in an exclusive interview with TOLOnews, the acting foreign minister had previously rejected any possibility of handing over Bagram Airbase to the US.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, the acting foreign minister, had stated: “Even if they recognize us and rebuild all of Afghanistan, not just Bagram, we will not give them even a meter of land. This is the stance of the Emirate and the people.”

Sayed Qareebullah Sadat, another political analyst, said: “The Americans think only of their own interests. We, the people of Afghanistan, should also focus on our national interests and how we can meet the needs of our own people.”

Bagram Airbase, located in Parwan province in northern Afghanistan, was the largest US military base in the country during its two-decade-long military presence.

Trump: Bagram Base Now Under China’s Control
read more

Jan Egeland: We Must Fight for Women’s Rights Inside Afghanistan

Egeland emphasized that representatives of European countries should travel to Kabul and Kandahar to advocate for the rights of women and girls.

Jan Egeland, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, has criticized world governments, stating that the international community has forgotten the people of Afghanistan.

In an interview with a French media outlet, Egeland emphasized that representatives of European countries should travel to Kabul and Kandahar to advocate for the rights of women and girls.

Egeland stated that there is no need for more meetings in Paris, Copenhagen, or Oslo. Afghan women need us to engage with them inside Afghanistan and fight for their rights.

“The world has realized that Afghanistan should not be left alone because other countries also have interests in Afghanistan. They want to remain active in Afghanistan and establish their institutions there,” said Mohammad Emal Dostyar, a university professor.

Meanwhile, the Financial Times also reported on the situation of women in Afghanistan, stating that 80% of Afghan women live in poverty, around 1.4 million girls are out of school, and women’s participation in the workforce is only 4.8%.

A section of the Financial Times report states: “The latest data shows that 80 percent of Afghan women live in poverty, at least 1.4mn girls are not in school and female participation in the labour force stands at just 4.8 per cent.”

“International organizations only reflect a small portion of the problems faced by Afghan women and girls, whereas the challenges of the Afghan people—especially women and girls—are much broader. The main cause of these challenges is the intelligence games of major powers,” said Lamya Shirzad, a women’s rights activist.

At the same time, some women in the country have called on the Islamic Emirate to create job opportunities and facilitate education.

“Those who have studied should be provided with job opportunities and allowed to continue their professional activities. Also, girls who have been deprived of school and university should be allowed to resume their education, especially on the day of the Prophet’s mission, as he himself had no issue with education,” said Farukh Hashemi, a student.

“Schools have been closed to us for four years. Not only me but all girls who have been deprived of education share a common demand: schools should be reopened so that we can continue our studies in schools and universities,” said Zahra Tawakuli, another student.

A while ago, during his visit to Afghanistan, Jan Egeland also emphasized the importance of education for both girls and boys and stated that he had discussed the matter with the authorities of the Islamic Emirate.

Jan Egeland: We Must Fight for Women’s Rights Inside Afghanistan
read more

“Just bread and tea”: WFP says aid cuts to Afghanistan leave millions hungry this winter

By

Any potential reduction in assistance for Afghanistan is, of course, concerning.
WFP says aid cuts to Afghanistan leave millions hungry this winter
  • Millions of Afghans going hungry this winter – WFP country director
  • Afghanistan’s 2024 humanitarian operations only half funded
  • U.S. funding freeze also looms
Many people were living on just “bread and tea”, WFP Country Director Hsiao-Wei Lee told Reuters.
Afghanistan was tipped to the brink of economic crisis in 2021 as the Taliban took over and all development and security assistance to the country was frozen, with restrictions also placed on the banking sector.
Since then humanitarian aid – aimed at funding urgent needs through non-profit organisations and bypassing government control – has filled some of the gap. But donors have been cutting steadily in recent years, concerned by Taliban restrictions on women, including their order that Afghan female NGO employees stop work, and competing global crises.
Lee told Reuters shortly before finishing her three-year term in Afghanistan that funding cuts had meant that roughly half the 15 million Afghans in acute need of food were not receiving rations during this year’s harsh winter.
“That’s over 6 million people who are probably eating one or two meals a day and it’s just bread and tea,” she said in an interview on Saturday. “Unfortunately this is what the situation looks like for so many that have been removed from assistance.”
Afghanistan’s humanitarian plan was only just over half funded in 2024, according to U.N. data, and aid officials have flagged fears this could fall further this year.
The U.S. State Department issued a “stop-work” order on Friday for all existing foreign assistance and paused new aid, according to a cable reported by Reuters, after President Donald Trump ordered a pause to review if aid allocation was aligned with his foreign policy.
It was not immediately clear how that would impact Afghanistan’s humanitarian operations, which in 2024 were over 40% funded by the United States, the largest donor.
“I think any potential reduction in assistance for Afghanistan is of course concerning…whether it is assistance to WFP or another actor,” Lee said.
“The levels of need are just so high here in Afghanistan. I certainly hope that any decisions made, any implementation of decisions made take into consideration the needs of the people – the women, the children,” she said.
Western diplomats and humanitarian officials have said aid is dropping to Afghanistan in part due to global emergencies in Sudan, Ukraine and Gaza and also because of concerns with Taliban restrictions on women.
Last week, the International Criminal Court prosecutor announced he had applied for arrest warrants for two Taliban leaders, including supreme spiritual leader Haibatullah Akhundzada, accusing them of the persecution of women and girls.
Lee said the operating environment had been a “rollercoaster” in the last three years, but that WFP was trying to prove to donors concerned about the plethora of restrictions on women that they were still reaching female beneficiaries and their children with aid.
Though the Taliban have said female Afghan NGO workers must stop work, many humanitarian organisations have said they have been granted exemptions, especially in areas like health.
Lee said WFP had adapted and been able to reach women despite funding cuts and official restrictions.

Reporting by Charlotte Greenfield, Editing by Angus MacSwan

“Just bread and tea”: WFP says aid cuts to Afghanistan leave millions hungry this winter
read more

What are the Taliban’s restrictions on Afghan women?

By Reuters

ISLAMABAD, Jan 23 (Reuters) – Since seizing power in 2021, Afghanistan’s Taliban administration has rolled back hard-fought rights won by Afghan women and girls during two decades of rule by American-backed governments.
The International Criminal Court prosecutor on Thursday said he had applied for arrest warrants for Taliban leaders, including supreme spiritual leader Haibatullah Akhundzada, accusing them of crimes against humanity for widespread discrimination against women and girls.
Following are details of the crackdown on rights imposed by the Islamist movement:
– Akhundzada ratified morality laws – widely criticised by rights groups as draconian – that included requiring women to cover their faces and also barring them from travelling without a male guardian.
– Taliban authorities have said Afghan women will no longer be allowed into public and amusement parks.
– Gyms and fitness centres for women have been banned across the country.
– The Taliban ordered the closing down of hundreds of beauty salons meant for women.
– Girls are allowed to go to school until the age of 12, or grade 6. Education after this has been disallowed, including for women who were already studying in universities.
– Women have been banned from most public sector jobs and employment with NGOs and are only allowed to work in certain specific situations, such as healthcare.
Any potential reduction in assistance for Afghanistan is, of course, concerning.

– The Taliban say they respect women’s rights in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic law and local customs and that they are internal matters that should be addressed locally.
– Their policies have been widely criticized internationally, however, including by Muslim-majority country’s governments. Western diplomats have said any steps towards official recognition of the Taliban are blocked until their administration changes course on women’s rights.
– The education bar on women, backed by Akhundzada and his conservative aides, is opposed by some senior Taliban leaders, who support moves to reintegrate Afghanistan into the global community.
What are the Taliban’s restrictions on Afghan women?
read more

Taliban ambassador warns Rubio against bounty threat over Americans detained in Afghanistan

By The Associated Press

A Taliban ambassador is warning new U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio against making threats after he said he would place bounties on Afghanistan’s rulers for their continued detention of U.S. nationals
A Taliban ambassador on Monday warned the new U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio against making threats after saying he would place bounties on Afghanistan’s rulers for their continued detention of U.S. nationals.

A prisoner swap between the U.S. and Afghanistan last week freed two Americans in exchange for a Taliban figure, Khan Muhammad.

The deal to release Ryan Corbett and William McKenty was brokered by Joe Biden ’s administration before he left office. But two more Americans, George Glezmann and Mahmood Habibi, remain in Taliban custody. The Taliban have not revealed how many foreigners are behind bars.

“Just hearing the Taliban is holding more American hostages than has been reported,” Rubio said in a post on X Saturday. “If this is true, we will have to immediately place a VERY BIG bounty on their top leaders, maybe even bigger than the one we had on (Osama) bin Laden.”

The Taliban’s ambassador to Qatar, Suhail Shaheen, said it was the policy of the Afghan government to resolve issues peacefully through dialogue, and he fired a warning shot at Rubio.

“In the face of pressure and aggression, the jihad (struggle) of the Afghan nation in recent decades is a lesson that everyone should learn from.”

The Taliban fought U.S. and NATO forces for two decades, eventually returning to power in August 2021 amid a deadly and chaotic withdrawal of foreign troops. Shaheen was part of the Taliban’s negotiating team in Doha to secure a peace deal for Afghanistan.

He said the recent release of another foreigner, Canadian David Lavery, from an Afghan jail had been achieved through mediation by the “friendly country of Qatar” and positive interactions with the Taliban government on such cases.

Earlier Monday, Canada’s foreign minister, Melanie Joly, said she had spoken with Lavery upon his arrival in Qatar.

“He is in good spirits,” Joly wrote on X, thanking Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani for helping facilitate Lavery’s release.

Taliban ambassador warns Rubio against bounty threat over Americans detained in Afghanistan
read more

Concerns Rise as US Halts All Foreign Aid, Excluding Israel and Egypt

The suspension of US development aid comes as concerns over Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis remain.

Following the 90-day suspension of US foreign development aid ordered by President Donald Trump, the US Department of State has now issued a directive to halt all foreign aid.

According to a Reuters report, exemptions have been granted for military funding to Israel and Egypt; however, no other countries, including Afghanistan, which previously received humanitarian aid from the US, have been mentioned under these exemptions.

The suspension of US development aid comes as concerns over Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis remain.

Askarullah, who polishes shoes on a roadside in Kabul due to economic hardships, told TOLOnews: “There is no money, and there is no work. Poverty is overwhelming. I leave home and come here, praying that God provides for me.”

Meanwhile, Jeremy Konyndyk, a former USAID official who is now president of Refugees International, has called the aid suspension “lunacy,” warning that it will lead to loss of lives.

Alexander Matheou, the Regional Director for Asia and the Pacific at the International Committee of the Red Cross, has also described the humanitarian situation in Afghanistan as critical. He emphasized that international aid to Afghanistan is insufficient and urged the global community not to turn away from Afghanistan in these circumstances.

Matheou said: “The humanitarian situation in Afghanistan is as grim as it has ever been. If you go into the villages, the mothers are anemic, the children are severely malnourished, everyone you as is looking for either medicine or food, or a blanket to cover their children with in the winter nights. In other words, this is a long and protracted crisis, it is still in an emergency phase in many parts of the country.”

Simultaneously, the Ministry of Economy has stated that the suspension of development aid by the international community contradicts international law and has urged global policymakers to reconsider their economic policies towards Afghanistan.

Abdul Latif Nazari, the deputy minister of economy, stated: “We want countries to reconsider their policies and adopt an engagement-based approach, particularly concerning economic matters with the Islamic Emirate.”

Meanwhile, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has reported in its latest assessment that in the current year, 22.9 million people in Afghanistan will require humanitarian aid. The report further states that to assist 16.8 million people in Afghanistan in 2025, $2.42 billion will be needed.

Concerns Rise as US Halts All Foreign Aid, Excluding Israel and Egypt
read more

ICC prosecutor seeks warrants for Taliban leaders over women’s rights

The Washington Post
January 23, 2025

The requested warrants target Haibatullah Akhundzada, the reclusive Kandahar-based leader of the Taliban, and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, the group’s chief justice.

The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor announced Thursday that he is seeking arrest warrants for the leader of the Taliban and another senior regime official over their alleged persecution of women and girls in Afghanistan.

The requested warrants target Haibatullah Akhundzada, the reclusive Kandahar-based leader of the Taliban, and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, the group’s chief justice.

Karim Khan, the ICC prosecutor, said his office has determined “there are reasonable grounds to believe” that both men “bear criminal responsibility for the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds.”

The judges of the court in The Hague will now decide whether to issue the warrants, the first to be sought over the situation in Afghanistan. Khan, a British lawyer, said Thursday that warrant applications for other senior Taliban members would be filed soon.

“These applications recognise that Afghan women and girls as well as the LGBTQI+ community are facing an unprecedented, unconscionable and ongoing persecution by the Taliban,” the prosecutor said in a statement. He added that “persons whom the Taliban perceived as allies of girls and women” have also been targeted.

The Taliban-run Foreign Ministry and the chief government spokesman did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The application for warrants was the result of a years-long investigation and was widely applauded by human rights groups Thursday. But even if the warrants are issued, they are likely to remain largely symbolic.

Akhundzada and Haqqani have made no known trips abroad in recent years, and Haqqani had already been placed under sanction by the European Union in 2023 for “gender repression.” Many of the countries where Taliban officials are currently able to travel have not signed or ratified the Rome Statute — the ICC’s founding document — meaning they have no obligation to arrest Akhundzada and Haqqani.

Experts say Thursday’s warrant applications represent a landmark effort to pursue gender-based persecution.

Such crimes have “rarely been thoroughly investigated or prosecuted, so this also marks progress in the broader international criminal justice effort, which will, hopefully, provide justice for other victims worldwide,” said Kingsley Abbott, an international criminal and human rights lawyer and a professor at the University of London.

The decision is likely to deepen the international isolation of the Taliban regime, which has not been formally recognized by any government since seizing power in 2021 after the withdrawal of U.S. forces.

Some countries have tried to establish diplomatic ties with the regime to solve bilateral issues, but the Taliban’s treatment of women — regarded by human rights experts as unparalleled in its severity and systematic implementation — has significantly hindered further engagement.

Earlier this week, President Donald Trump suspended the U.S. refugee admissions program, which halted flights for Afghans who had hoped to resettle in America and left thousands of other applicants in limbo. Many of those seeking refuge are women and girls, who say they have no future in Afghanistan.

The government in Kabul has imposed increasingly repressive measures against women and girls, banning them from secondary and university education and limiting their ability to participate in public life.

Women are barred from parks and are forbidden to undertake long-distance travel without a male relative. Last month, they were banned from pursuing careers as nurses and midwives, which experts warned could exacerbate a mounting health crisis in the country.

The ICC prosecutor said that based on testimonies, forensic reports and public statements, his office found the Taliban leaders to be in violation of the “right to physical integrity and autonomy, to free movement and free expression, to education, to private and family life, and to free assembly.”

The complaint also cited acts of “murder, imprisonment, torture, rape and other forms of sexual violence, enforced disappearance, and other inhumane acts.”

Taliban officials have said previously that women’s lives have improved under their rule. Akhundzada said in a 2023 audio message that he wants women to live “comfortable” lives.

Behind closed doors, some members of the Taliban government have criticized Akhundzada for the tightening of restrictions on women and girls. But almost none of them have made their reservations public.

Haq Nawaz Khan contributed to this report.

ICC prosecutor seeks warrants for Taliban leaders over women’s rights
read more

ICC chief prosecutor seeks arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over persecution of women

The international criminal court’s chief prosecutor has requested arrest warrants for the Taliban’s supreme leader and Afghanistan’s chief justice on the grounds that their persecution of women and girls in Afghanistan is a crime against humanity.

It marks the first time the prosecutor has built a case around systemic crimes against women and girls, legal experts say. It is also a rare moment of vindication for Afghan activists, who over the last three years have often felt abandoned by the international community even as Taliban oppression deepened.

Shukria Barakzai, activist and former member of the Afghan parliament, said in a statement: “This historic announcement is a powerful message that impunity for flagrant violations of women’s rights is not to be tolerated in Afghanistan or anywhere else in the world. We are deeply grateful to all our Afghan sisters who have worked relentlessly toward this moment.”

Karim Khan, the ICC chief prosecutor, said in a statement that the Taliban’s supreme leader, Haibatullah Akhundzada, and chief justice, Abdul Hakim Haqqani, are “criminally responsible” for ongoing persecution of girls, women, the LGBTQ+ community, and their allies.

“Our commitment to pursue accountability for gender-based crimes, including gender persecution, remains an absolute priority,” he said. The team will file warrants for other senior Taliban officials soon, he added.

Since sweeping back to power in 2021, the Taliban have issued more than 80 decrees that violate women’s basic rights. Women are barred from most worksecondary education and public spaces, and their daily life is restricted in various ways.

Recently the group banned windows in rooms frequently used by women, to ensure they could not be seen by men not related to them. New buildings should be constructed without windows in these rooms and existing windows should be covered up, the order stipulated.

Activists are campaigning for the crime of gender apartheid to be recognised under international law, to reflect the scale of Taliban restrictions.

Akila Radhakrishnan, strategic legal adviser on gender justice for the Atlantic Council, said that although the ICC had sought to prosecute gender crimes before, this is the first time they had been the main focus in a case.

She said: “It is a landmark, because this is the first time a case has been built around crimes of gender persecution. Usually gender crimes are ancillary, an add-on to a case driven by other [crimes].

“The request for an arrest warrant … demonstrates the systematic way in which these violations have been working in tandem to oppress girls and women under the Taliban’s gender apartheid.”

There may not be any immediate consequences. Neither man is likely to travel anywhere they could face arrest – Akhundzada rarely even leaves his base in Kandahar – and the group has only responded with defiance to other international pressure over their treatment of women.

Nevertheless, Radhakrishnan said, even without any expectation of a day in court, the warrant sent an important message.

She said: “It helps to stigmatise what is happening in Afghanistan. We can now say that people engaging with the Taliban are on notice that what their officials are doing is criminal. There are warrant requests out for the most serious crimes that exist.”

Afghan women who have endured violence and exile for demanding basic rights said the case marked a critical vindication of their struggle.

Zahra Haqparast was jailed by the Taliban in 2022 for protesting against restrictions on women’s lives and now lives in exile. She said: “This is the best news I’ve heard since the Taliban came to power.

“I was cooking lunch when I heard the news, and I was so happy that I ran to check immediately if it was true. By the time I got back, an hour had passed, and my food was burnt.”

Despite initial outrage at Taliban restrictions when the group seized power in 2021, Afghan women say an international community that once claimed to be fighting in their name has not done enough to fight back.

Heather Barr, deputy women’s rights director at Human Rights Watch, said: “They have felt ignored by the world while the Taliban has systematically stripped their rights away day after day. This step by the ICC is a good start. Afghan women and girls are owed full justice for the Taliban’s crimes and an end, now, to Taliban abuses.”

Afghan activists also called on the court to seek justice for other crimes by several perpetrators over more than four decades of war in Afghanistan.

“It is historic but it is insufficient,” said Shaharzad Akbar, executive director of Rawadari, an Afghan human rights organisation. “It leaves out many victims of war crimes and other perpetuators.”

ICC chief prosecutor seeks arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over persecution of women
read more