India, Central Asia Reaffirm Support for Peace in Afghanistan

According to India’s Ministry of External Affairs, during the fourth meeting of the foreign ministers of India and the five Central Asian countries, it was agreed to continue coordinated dialogue on issues related to Afghanistan.

The joint statement reads: “The Ministers reiterated their strong support for a peaceful and stable Afghanistan which is free from terrorism, war and drugs.”

The statement also highlighted the importance of humanitarian support for the Afghan people.

The ministers further recognized the role of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in promoting peace, security, stability, and economic development in the region.

Nesar Ahmad Shirzai, a political analyst, said: “The concerns of these countries must be acknowledged — especially India, which has consistently emphasized addressing the challenges facing the Afghan people and has never interfered in Afghanistan’s internal affairs.”

This emphasis on peace and stability in Afghanistan comes as the interim government maintains close political and economic relations with India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

India, Central Asia Reaffirm Support for Peace in Afghanistan
read more

Travel ban may shut door for Afghan family to bring niece to US for a better life

By JEFFREY COLLINS
Associated Press

IRMO, S.C. (AP) — Mohammad Sharafoddin, his wife and young son walked at times for 36 hours in a row over mountain passes as they left Afghanistan as refugees to end up less than a decade later talking about their journey on a plush love seat in the family’s three-bedroom suburban American home.

He and his wife dreamed of bringing her niece to the United States to share in that bounty. Maybe she could study to become a doctor and then decide her own path.

But that door slams shut on Monday as America put in place a travel ban for people from Afghanistan and a dozen other countries.

“It’s kind of shock for us when we hear about Afghanistan, especially right now for ladies who are affected more than others with the new government,” Mohammad Sharafoddin said, referring to the country’s Taliban rulers. “We didn’t think about this travel ban.”

Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021 as the Western forces were in the final phase of their withdrawal from the country, they have barred education for women and girls beyond sixth grade, most employment and many public spaces. Last August, the Taliban introduced laws that ban women’s voices and bare faces outside the home.President Donald Trump signed the travel ban Wednesday. It is similar to one in place during his first administration but covers more countries. Along with Afghanistan, travel to the U.S. is banned from Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

Trump said visitors who overstay visas, like the man charged in an attack that injured dozens of demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, are a danger to the country. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, which isn’t included in the ban.

The countries chosen for the ban have deficient screening of their citizens, often refuse to take them back and have a high percentage of people who stay in the U.S. after their visas expire, Trump said.

The ban makes exceptions for people from Afghanistan on Special Immigrant Visas who generally worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there.

Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office.

It is a path Sharafoddin took with his wife and son out of Afghanistan walking on those mountain roads in the dark then through Pakistan, Iran and into Turkey. He worked in a factory for years in Turkey, listening to YouTube videos on headphones to learn English before he was resettled in Irmo, South Carolina, a suburb of Columbia.

His son is now 11, and he and his wife had a daughter in the U.S. who is now 3. There is a job at a jewelry maker that allows him to afford a two-story, three-bedroom house. Food was laid out on two tables Saturday for a celebration of the Muslim Eid al-Adha holiday.

Sharafoddin’s wife, Nuriya, said she is learning English and driving — two things she couldn’t do in Afghanistan under Taliban rule.

“I’m very happy to be here now, because my son is very good at school and my daughter also. I think after 18 years they are going to work, and my daughter is going to be able to go to college,” she said.

It is a life she wanted for her niece too. The couple show videos from their cellphones of her drawing and painting. When the Taliban returned to power in 2021, their niece could no longer study. So they started to plan to get her to the U.S. at least to further her education.

Nuriya Sharafoddin doesn’t know if her niece has heard the news from America yet. She hasn’t had the heart to call and tell her.

“I’m not ready to call her. This is not good news. This is very sad news because she is worried and wants to come,” Nuriya Sharafoddin said.

While the couple spoke, Jim Ray came by. He has helped a number of refugee families settle in Columbia and helped the Sharafoddins navigate questions in their second language.

But while the ban allows spouses, children or parents to travel to America, other family members aren’t included. Many Afghans know their extended families are starving or suffering, and suddenly a path to help is closed, Ray said.

“We’ll have to wait and see how the travel ban and the specifics of it actually play out,” Ray said. “This kind of thing that they’re experiencing where family cannot be reunited is actually where it hurts the most.”

The Taliban criticize the travel ban

The Taliban have criticized Trump for the ban, with their top leader Hibatullah Akhundzada saying the U.S. was now the oppressor of the world.

“Citizens from 12 countries are barred from entering their land — and Afghans are not allowed either,” he said on a recording shared on social media. “Why? Because they claim the Afghan government has no control over its people and that people are leaving the country. So, oppressor! Is this what you call friendship with humanity?”

Travel ban may shut door for Afghan family to bring niece to US for a better life
read more

Explosion in Paktia, Afghanistan kills one, injures four

Khaama Press

An explosion in Paktia killed a 12-year-old child and injured four others, exposing risks from leftover war explosives in Afghanistan.

Local sources in Paktia province report that a 12-year-old child was killed and four others injured in a mine explosion. The incident occurred in the village of Hasan Khil in Dand-e-Patan district on Sunday. According to reports, the children were playing with a mortar shell when the explosion happened.

Locals attribute the explosion to a roadside mine, while the Taliban claim it was caused by leftover munitions from Afghanistan’s long-standing conflicts. The injured children were immediately taken to a nearby hospital, where their condition has been reported as stable.

Explosions from unexploded ordnance (UXO) continue to pose a serious threat, especially to children in Afghanistan. These remnants of past wars frequently cause casualties in civilian areas, highlighting the ongoing dangers faced by local communities.

Humanitarian organizations have long warned about the risks UXOs present, urging for increased clearance efforts and education to protect vulnerable populations. According to the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS), Afghanistan remains one of the most heavily mined countries in the world.

Efforts by NGOs and international agencies aim to reduce UXO-related casualties, but challenges remain due to the country’s rugged terrain and ongoing conflict.

The tragic death of a child in Paktia province underscores the urgent need for enhanced mine clearance and awareness programs. Preventing further civilian casualties requires sustained international support and cooperation.

Without immediate action, unexploded ordnance will continue to threaten the safety and lives of Afghan civilians, especially children, prolonging the humanitarian crisis in the region.

Explosion in Paktia, Afghanistan kills one, injures four
read more

Reaction to Trump’s Travel Ban: Calls to Exempt P-2 Cases

They are asking Trump to exempt P-1 and P-2 categories of immigration cases from the executive order.

As the full implementation of Donald Trump’s new executive order banning travel to the United States for citizens of 12 countries moves forward, some individuals with pending US immigration cases are calling for a reconsideration of the decision.

They are asking Trump to exempt P-1 and P-2 categories of immigration cases from the executive order.

Eid Mohammad Hakimi, an Afghan holding a P-2 case, said: “The enforcement of the travel ban and the suspension of P-1 and P-2 cases for Afghans has put Afghan citizens in third countries in a completely uncertain situation. We request the US government to exempt P-1 and P-2 cases from this ban.”

Meanwhile, Sean Van Diver, head of the Afghan Evac organization, said at a gathering in front of the White House that 200,000 Afghans have been relocated to the United States over the past four years, while another 200,000 are still waiting for the process to be completed. He urged American officials to honor their commitments.

Shawn Van Diver also stated: “We must unite and defend our rights. The promises made to us must be fulfilled. This country must be held accountable for the commitments it made to us and to our allies.”

At the same time, large protests have erupted in several states against Trump’s immigration policies.

Due to these protests, the US president ordered the deployment of national guard forces in some cities.

Jim McDonnell, chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, commented: “Do we need the National Guard? Looking at the situation tonight, it seems this is getting out of control. Before giving a precise answer, I need to understand their capabilities and role. However, we have strong police forces in Southern California that always work together.”

In cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and others, the protests turned violent, leading to dozens of arrests by police.

This comes as Trump issued a new executive order on Wednesday, banning visa issuance for citizens of Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, Sudan, Myanmar, Chad, Eritrea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Guinea.

Reaction to Trump’s Travel Ban: Calls to Exempt P-2 Cases
read more

The Taliban leader slams Trump’s travel ban on Afghans and calls the US an ‘oppressor’

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

The top Taliban leader on Saturday slammed President Donald Trump’s travel ban on Afghans, calling the United States an oppressor, as Afghanistan’s rulers seek greater engagement with the international community.

The comments from Hibatullah Akhundzada marked the first public reaction from the Taliban since the Trump administration this week moved to bar citizens from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, from entering the U.S.

Trump’s executive order largely applies to Afghans hoping to resettle in the U.S. permanently, as well as those hoping to go to America temporarily, including for university studies.

Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banned women from public places and education for women and girls beyond the sixth grade. And though they have so far failed to gain recognition as the country’s official government, the Taliban have diplomatic relations with several countries, including China and Russia.

A message from the leader

Akhundzada released his message on the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, also known as the “Feast of Sacrifice,” from the southern city of Kandahar, where he has set up base but is rarely seen in public.

In a 45-minute audio recording shared by Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid on X, Akhundzada denounced the Trump administration for imposing “restrictions on people.”

“Citizens from 12 countries are barred from entering their land — and Afghans are not allowed either,” he said. “Why? Because they claim the Afghan government has no control over its people and that people are leaving the country. So, oppressor! Is this what you call friendship with humanity?”

He blamed the U.S. for the deaths of Palestinian women and children in Gaza, linking this allegation to the travel ban. “You are committing acts that are beyond tolerance,” he added.

The Trump administration says the measure is meant to protect U.S. citizens from “aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes.”

Trump also suspended a core refugee program in January, all but ending support for Afghans who had allied with the U.S. and leaving tens of thousands of them stranded.

The Taliban offer amnesty

Also on Saturday, the Taliban prime minister said that all Afghans who fled the country after the collapse of the former Western-backed government are free to return home, promising they would be safe.

“Afghans who have left the country should return to their homeland,” Mohammad Hassan Akhund said. “Nobody will harm them.”

“Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace,” the Taliban prime minister said in a message on X and instructed officials to ensure returning refugees were given shelter and support.

He also used the occasion to criticize the media for making what he said were “false judgements” about Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers and their policies.

“We must not allow the torch of the Islamic system to be extinguished,” he said. “The media should avoid false judgments and should not minimize the accomplishments of the system. While challenges exist, we must remain vigilant.”

The return of the Taliban rule

The Taliban swept into the capital of Kabul and seized most of Afghanistan in a blitz in mid-August 2021 as the U.S. and NATO forces were in the last weeks of their pullout from the country after 20 years of war.

The offensive prompted a mass exodus, with tens of thousands of Afghans thronging the airport in chaotic scenes, hoping for a flight out on the U.S. military airlift. People also fled across the border, to neighboring Iran and Pakistan.

Among those escaping the new Taliban rulers were also former government officials, journalists, activists, those who had helped the U.S. during its campaign against the Taliban.

Separately, Afghans in neighboring Pakistan who are awaiting resettlement are also dealing with a deportation drive by the Islamabad government to get them out of the country. Almost a million have left Pakistan since October 2023 to avoid arrest and expulsion.

 

The Taliban leader slams Trump’s travel ban on Afghans and calls the US an ‘oppressor’
read more

Afghan TPS holders should have applied for permanent residency, Says US State Department

Khaama Press

The U.S. State Department stated that Afghan TPS holders were expected to apply for permanent residency before the temporary status ended.

The U.S. State Department has responded to growing concerns over the cancellation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Afghan refugees, stating that individuals under this program were expected to apply for permanent residency.

Deputy State Department Spokesperson Tommy Pigott stated during a press briefing on Thursday, June 5, that TPS was always intended to be a short-term benefit. He emphasized that the status would eventually end, and beneficiaries should have made efforts toward more stable immigration pathways.

Pigott also stressed the importance of ensuring that Afghan individuals entering the U.S. undergo thorough vetting. “It is essential for the U.S. government to verify the background and eligibility of each Afghan entrant,” he said, highlighting national security concerns.

In addressing the impact of President Donald Trump’s recent executive order, Pigott noted that an exception was made for holders of the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV), a program specifically designed for Afghans who worked with U.S. missions.

President Trump on Wednesday signed a controversial directive barring entry to citizens of 12 countries, including Afghanistan and Iran. The decision has been widely criticized by human rights groups and immigration advocates for disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations.

Previously, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had announced its intention to end TPS for Afghans, a move that could affect thousands of refugees who fled after the fall of Kabul in 2021.

This policy shift places immense pressure on Afghan TPS holders to seek long-term immigration relief or face potential deportation. Legal experts warn that the cancellation could lead to a humanitarian crisis without additional support or legal reforms.

Afghan TPS holders should have applied for permanent residency, Says US State Department
read more

Afghanistan Hunger Crisis: One in Five require urgent food assistance

By Fidel Rahmati

One in five Afghans urgently need food aid as rising hunger threatens millions amid economic collapse and declining international support.

The World Food Programme (WFP) has reported that one in every five people in Afghanistan is dependent on humanitarian aid to survive. The agency warned that if international support continues to decline, millions more Afghans will face severe hunger and food insecurity in the coming months.

According to the latest WFP assessment, approximately 20% of Afghanistan’s population is currently in crisis and in urgent need of food assistance. The report states that nearly 15 million people could experience critical food shortages if global aid drops further.

The WFP estimates that between May and October 2025, around 9.5 million Afghans will require immediate food support. Of this population, about 1.6 million are expected to be in the emergency phase (IPC Phase 4), while nearly 7.93 million will fall under the crisis phase (IPC Phase 3) of food insecurity.

The organization has raised serious concerns over the declining international commitment to Afghanistan, urging the global community to scale up its support. Without renewed humanitarian engagement, the agency cautions that a large-scale human catastrophe is imminent.

Years of economic instability, prolonged droughts, and ongoing internal conflicts and the Taliban rule have severely worsened Afghanistan’s food security. International organizations have consistently flagged the deteriorating conditions and stressed the need for sustained donor funding to prevent a humanitarian disaster.

Experts emphasize that long-term solutions must address the root causes of hunger in Afghanistan, including agricultural rehabilitation, water infrastructure, and economic development. Short-term relief alone cannot prevent recurring cycles of crisis.

As the global spotlight dims on Afghanistan, humanitarian agencies warn that neglect could cost millions of lives. Renewed global solidarity is essential to support Afghans through one of the worst hunger crises in the country’s modern history.

Afghanistan Hunger Crisis: One in Five require urgent food assistance
read more

Richard Bennett: Afghanistan’s people show inspiring resilience amid hardship

Khaama Press

Richard Bennett praised the people of Afghanistan for their inspiring resilience amid ongoing hardships and restrictions on civil liberties.

Richard Bennett, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan, has described the resilience and resistance of Afghanistan’s citizens under Taliban rule as a source of inspiration. His remarks come amid ongoing restrictions imposed on civil liberties, particularly affecting women and girls.

In a post on X on Friday, June 6, Bennett extended Eid al-Adha greetings to all Muslims. He expressed hope that the occasion would signal a future where all people can live with freedom, dignity, and equal rights.

The Taliban have officially declared Saturday as the first day of Eid al-Adha. However, celebrations in Afghanistan are overshadowed by increasing limitations on basic freedoms and human rights, especially for women, who remain banned from parks, public spaces, and many forms of social participation.

Reports indicate that the Taliban have closed recreational venues to women and placed restrictions on their movement within cities, further intensifying concerns over gender-based repression.

In addition to social restrictions, economic hardship continues to weigh heavily on many Afghans. Citizens have expressed deep frustration over their inability to afford Eid celebrations, citing widespread poverty, rising prices, and growing unemployment.

The UN and global human rights organizations have repeatedly condemned the Taliban’s gender apartheid policies and called for the restoration of basic freedoms and access to education and employment for women of Afghanistan.

As Eid arrives under a cloud of hardship, the international community faces renewed pressure to support the Afghanistan people—particularly women and marginalized groups—in their struggle for dignity and fundamental rights.

Richard Bennett: Afghanistan’s people show inspiring resilience amid hardship
read more

Kabul Retirees Complain of Delayed Pensions, Challenges During Eid

They criticized the delay in receiving their pensions, stating that even during these special days, they are struggling with livelihood challenges.

A number of retirees in Kabul complained about their difficult economic situation on the first day of Eid al-Adha.

They criticized the delay in receiving their pensions, stating that even during these special days, they are struggling with livelihood challenges.

Zarifa, one of the retirees who lives with her two sisters, expressed her situation with a calm yet deeply emotional tone, saying that this year, due to financial hardship, they were unable to prepare for Eid.

Zarifa, a retiree, said: “We have not been able to prepare anything until now. God is merciful; may He bless us. The Islamic Emirate must consider the proposals for us retirees. We have nothing in our lives.”

Zarmeena, Zarifa’s sister, said: “If they pay our pension, why should we reach such a state? How long will this continue—one year, two years, now it’s the fifth year. The Islamic Emirate must hear the voice of all Muslims, including ours.”

Alongside Zarifa, several other retirees also demanded that the Islamic Emirate pay their pensions promptly so they can meet their families’ basic needs.

Gulabuddin, a retiree, said: “For four years, letters have been sent, but why are they not implemented?”

Another retiree, Gul Mohammad, said: “For the sake of Eid al-Adha, something should be given to us. We cannot even afford to perform the sacrifice or buy food.”

Ahmad Zia Noori, another retiree, added: “For the sake of Eid, do not trouble us anymore. Enough is enough. We are laborers; show some kindness and mercy, issue the orders so we can also have peace and so can you.”

The delay in pension payments has caused many retirees, who served for years in government institutions, to face economic difficulties and struggle to provide for their families.

So far, the Islamic Emirate officials have not commented on the timing of pension payments.

Kabul Retirees Complain of Delayed Pensions, Challenges During Eid
read more

‘Abandoned’: Afghan women waiting for visas feel betrayed by US travel ban

By  and 

  • Trump order blocks Afghan citizens from the United States
  • Thousands of Afghans stuck in Pakistan waiting for US processing
  • ‘Turned hopes into ashes’ says women’s rights defender
ISLAMABAD/KABUL, June 5 (Reuters) – Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women’s rights defender waiting in limbo in Pakistan for her U.S. visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after President Donald Trump included Afghans among those banned from entering the U.S.
She worked for decades for U.S.-funded projects in Central Afghanistan and now risks being pushed back to her home country, where she fears for her safety and her teenage daughter is unable to attend school.

The Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up here.

Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday banning nationals of 12 countries, including Afghanistan, from entering the United States, saying the move was needed to protect against “foreign terrorists” and other security threats.
“We are not al-Qaeda, we are the ones who fought back, we are the ones who gave our youth, our strength, our physical energy, our voices, everything we had, for the dream of a peaceful nation, for a country where we could simply breathe, we stood beside NATO forces,” said Fatima.
“And today, to be abandoned by America is not only tragic, it is devastating, It is a source of deep despair,” she added.

HELP PLEDGED FOR ALLIES

In the chaotic withdrawal of U.S.-led foreign troops as Taliban forces seized Kabul in 2021, Western countries vowed to help, especially those Afghans who had worked for them or on projects they backed. But many have been disappointed.
Then-President Joe Biden pledged to help “Afghan allies” and introduced the P-2 programme for admission as refugees for Afghans who met certain criteria, including having worked for U.S. organisations and media.
The main refugee advocate agency this year estimated that between 10,000-15,000 Afghans were waiting in Pakistan for their visas to be processed, though that included applicants to the Special Immigration Visa (SIV) program for those who directly assisted the U.S. military and government, which was exempted from this week’s order.
Fatima said she had hoped never to leave her country but as the prominent head of a women’s rights group she felt she had no choice after the Taliban returned to power. The U.S. government instructed her to travel to a third country for processing and like many, her only option was neighbouring Pakistan where she arrived in 2023.
She finally received notice that she should send her family’s passports to prepare for a flight in January. But a decision that month by President Trump to halt refugee processing threw that into disarray and Fatima has not heard from U.S. authorities since.
In the meantime, Pakistan began once again ramping up a repatriation drive that began in 2023, leaving many in the pipeline for U.S. processing fearful of even leaving the house in case they were stopped by police.
A spokesperson for Pakistan’s foreign office did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday on how it would handle the Afghans in the pipeline for the U.S. The Taliban-run foreign ministry did not immediately respond to request for comment on Trump’s executive order.
The Taliban, which has barred women from travelling without a male guardian and girls from high school, says it respects women’s rights in accordance with its interpretation of Islamic law. It has said that its administration is not targeting former foes with violence and it will investigate any suspected cases.
Mahbouba Seraj, a prominent Kabul-based women’s rights advocate, said the new U.S. decision was a huge blow to women’s rights defenders and other vulnerable groups.
“This is absolutely terrible because a whole lot of those… people were waiting, they have all of their paperwork done, they are completely vetted, they are all ready to come to the U.S., they have sold their houses, they have no life in Afghanistan and they are all waiting,” she said. “Now this is what happens.”

Reporting by Charlotte Greenfield in Islamabad and Mohammad Yunus Yawar in Kabul; Editing by Sharon Singleton

‘Abandoned’: Afghan women waiting for visas feel betrayed by US travel ban
read more