Taliban Confirms Hand Grenade Attack At Aybak Mosque in Samangan

Volant Media UK Limited

Feb 14, 2025, 12:26 GMT

The Taliban police command in Samangan has confirmed an explosion at the Joi Zindan Mosque in the city centre of Aybak.

Hashmatullah Rahmani, the Taliban police spokesperson, stated that the incident occurred when two individuals threw a hand grenade into the mosque during prayers, reportedly over a “personal dispute.”

Rahmani indicated that at least four worshippers were injured in the attack. He added that Taliban security forces arrived promptly at the scene and subsequently arrested the perpetrators, confirming that the two attackers were armed. The incident is currently under investigation, and the injured have been transferred to Mazar-e-Sharif Provincial Hospital for treatment.

Earlier reports from local sources told Afghanistan International that an explosion and subsequent gunfire had been heard inside the Grand Mosque in the Joi Zindan area, with a grenade being thrown followed by gunfire. Doctors from the Samangan Public Health Department reported that dozens of worshippers were injured during the attack.

This attack is the latest in a series of explosions in Afghanistan in recent days. On the morning of Thursday, 13 February, a suicide attack targeted the Taliban’s Ministry of Urban Development in Kabul, resulting in multiple casualties.

Prior to that, on Tuesday, 11 February, a suicide bomber detonated explosives outside the Kabul Bank office in Kunduz, where Taliban officials and military personnel were awaiting their salaries. ISIS-K later claimed responsibility for the Kunduz attack.

 

Taliban Confirms Hand Grenade Attack At Aybak Mosque in Samangan
read more

UNICEF and ADB officials highlight support for women and children in Afghanistan

Tajudeen Oyewale, the UNICEF representative in Afghanistan, emphasized support for women and children during a meeting with officials from the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

On Friday, February 14, Oyewale stated on his X account regarding the meeting with ADB officials, discussing how they can support women and children in Afghanistan.

He described the meeting as a “strong partnership for a brighter future for women and children in Afghanistan” and stressed that they are working together to expand essential services and create more opportunities to help those in greatest need.

He emphasized that during the discussion, both parties agreed to expand essential services and provide more opportunities for those in need. No further details have been released about the meeting’s discussions.

This comes at a time when several international humanitarian organizations have expressed concern over the worsening humanitarian situation in Afghanistan, especially for women, after the suspension of U.S. aid.

According to reports, Afghanistan’s economic and social crises have intensified, leaving millions of women and children reliant on humanitarian aid to meet their basic needs. Recently, the World Bank reported that Afghanistan is facing a severe food security crisis, with at least 2.9 million people currently on the brink of hunger.

UNICEF and ADB officials highlight support for women and children in Afghanistan
read more

Muttaqi Warns Against Unjust Criticism, Disobedience

During his speech, the acting foreign minister described unjust criticism as a cause of ruin.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, acting minister of foreign affairs, stated during a ceremony at a religious school in Kabul that those who disobey the Amir (leader) will face downfall.

During his speech, the acting foreign minister described unjust criticism as a cause of ruin.

Muttaqi said: “Now that Allah has granted us a society where we have elders, youth, teachers, an Amir, ministers, governors, and district chiefs, if we entertain wrong thoughts, follow other groups, engage in gossip, undermine our own community, and offer unjust criticism, it will lead to ruin.”

In another part of his speech, Muttaqi urged members of the Islamic Emirate to avoid narrow-mindedness and not to act in ways that alienate the people.

The acting foreign minister added: “The Taliban should not be narrow-minded, should not rely solely on themselves, or consider themselves perfect. They must view every individual in society with respect and dignity.”

Salim Paigir, a political analyst, told TOLOnews: “The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has not taken significant steps in this area over the past three and a half years. It must also accept the Afghan people and political figures to collectively solve the current challenges of the country.”

This comes as the spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate recently acknowledged differences in views among its members but clarified that these differences do not imply division or conflict.

Muttaqi Warns Against Unjust Criticism, Disobedience
read more

Younus Akhundzada: No Internal Divisions in the Islamic Emirate

During the ceremony, the acting minister emphasized that the current system was established through sacrifice.

Mohammad Younus Akhundzada, acting minister of rural rehabilitation and development, stated during the inauguration of a project in Maiwand district of Kandahar that there are no divisions within the Islamic Emirate.

During the ceremony, the acting minister emphasized that the current system was established through sacrifice, and both officials and citizens have specific responsibilities toward it.

According to Akhundzada, the presence of the Islamic Emirate’s leader ensures that the enemies’ dream of creating divisions among the members of the Islamic Emirate will never come true.

Mohammad Younus Akhundzada also stated, “As long as this Amir is present, the idea that divisions could arise within the Islamic Emirate to the point of fragmentation is nothing but a dream. I assure you there are no divisions—do not worry. The system is moving forward on the path paved by sacrifices. You have responsibilities toward this system, and so do we.”

During the event, the acting minister inaugurated a 30 million afghani road reconstruction project. Akhundzada highlighted that connecting rural areas and providing services to their residents are key priorities for the ministry.

The acting minister added, “There are numerous ongoing projects—hundreds, in fact—in water supply networks, canals, dams, and roads. However, after 45 years of destruction in a country, it is extremely challenging to rebuild and restore it within just two or three years.”

Meanwhile, several residents of Maiwand district in Kandahar province stated that the implementation of reconstruction projects plays a vital role in addressing the people’s challenges.

Mohammad Qasim, a resident of Maiwand, told TOLOnews, “Besides the road, we need electricity, schools, and religious institutions, which must be provided to us.”

According to the Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development, most of its development programs, launched under the balanced development initiative, are nearing completion across the country.

Younus Akhundzada: No Internal Divisions in the Islamic Emirate
read more

US, China Clash Over Drafting Afghanistan Resolutions at UN

According to the report, Pakistan and South Korea, two non-permanent members of the Security Council, had also sought to take on this responsibility.

The online forum Just Security reported that an “obscure diplomatic dispute over who should draft United Nations Security Council resolutions on Afghanistan is turning into a major row between the United States and China in the world body.”

This institution, which operates in the fields of security, politics, and democracy, added that the entity responsible for drafting UN resolutions would have the privilege and authority to determine the conditions and manner in which council members address specific cases.

The report states: “An obscure diplomatic dispute over who should draft United Nations Security Council resolutions on Afghanistan is turning into a major row between the United States and China in the world body. The debate, which has been brewing since late 2024 but has escalated in recent weeks since the Trump administration took over the US seat, has significant implications not only for how the UN engages with the Taliban in Kabul, but also for how Beijing positions itself as a leading power in the Security Council.”

According to the report, Pakistan and South Korea, two non-permanent members of the Security Council, had also sought to take on this responsibility. However, China’s candidacy for the task has faced opposition from the United States, which has also led to a deadlock over the extension of the UNAMA mandate.

Fazl-ur-Rahman Oria, a political analyst, told TOLOnews: “It is in Afghanistan’s interest for China to have the authority to arrange agendas and draft resolutions.”

Previously, the United Arab Emirates and Japan were responsible for handling Afghanistan’s case in the UN Security Council. The UAE’s mission had stated that during its two-year tenure as a non-permanent member of the Security Council, it had supported women’s rights, peace, and security in Afghanistan.

US, China Clash Over Drafting Afghanistan Resolutions at UN
read more

Nearly $500m of food aid at risk of spoilage after Trump USAid cuts

The Guardian

Mon 10 Feb 2025

Nearly half a billion dollars of food aid is at risk of spoilage following the decision of Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s “Doge” agency to make cuts to USAid, according to an inspector general (IG) report released on Monday.

Following staff reductions and funding freezes, the US agency responsible for providing humanitarian assistance across the world – including food, water, shelter and emergency healthcare – is struggling to function.

“Recent widespread staffing reductions across the agency … coupled with uncertainty about the scope of foreign assistance waivers and permissible communications with implementers, has degraded USAid’s ability to distribute and safeguard taxpayer-funded humanitarian assistance,” the report said.

According to USAid staff, this uncertainty put more than $489m of food assistance at ports, in transit, and in warehouses at risk of spoilage, unanticipated storage needs, and diversion.

USAid employs about 10,000 staff, with approximately two-thirds posted at the agency’s more than 60 missions overseas across multiple countries. The entire staff was put on administrative leave on Saturday, with limited exceptions.

David Lammy observes aid deliveries at a refugee camp in Adre, Chad.
Trump’s foreign aid cuts could be ‘big strategic mistake’, says Lammy
Read more

The decision has caused chaos and devastation for those receiving foreign aid, such as in Malawi, one of the world’s most aid-dependent states.

The sweeping freeze on foreign assistance has also made it more difficult to track potential misuse of US taxpayer-funded humanitarian assistance, according to the report.

“While the USAid OIG [office of inspector general] has previously identified gaps in the scope of partner vetting, 10 USAid staff have reported that the counter-terrorism vetting unit supporting humanitarian assistance programming has in recent days been told not to report to work (because staff have been furloughed or placed on administrative leave) and thus cannot conduct any partner vetting,” the report said.

The agency requires that programs in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Yemen, Syria, the West Bank and Gaza be vetted to ensure safe usage of US taxpayer funds. However, a lack of workers to vet the programs could lead to funding unintentionally being funneled into terrorist groups, according to the report.

Why you can rely on the Guardian not to bow to Trump – or anyone

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask whether you could support the Guardian’s journalism as we begin to cover the second Trump administration.

As Trump himself observed: “The first term, everybody was fighting me. In this term, everybody wants to be my friend.”

He’s not entirely wrong. All around us, media organizations have begun to capitulate. First, two news outlets pulled election endorsements at the behest of their billionaire owners. Next, prominent reporters bent the knee at Mar-a-Lago. And then a major network – ABC News – rolled over in response to Trump’s legal challenges and agreed to a $16m million settlement in his favor.

The Guardian is clear: we have no interest in being Donald Trump’s – or any politician’s – friend. Our allegiance as independent journalists is not to those in power but to the public. Whatever happens in the coming months and years, you can rely on the Guardian never to bow down to power, nor back down from truth.

How are we able to stand firm in the face of intimidation and threats? As journalists say: follow the money. The Guardian has neither a self-interested billionaire owner nor profit-seeking corporate henchmen pressuring us to appease the rich and powerful. We are funded by our readers and owned by the Scott Trust – whose only financial obligation is to preserve our journalistic mission in perpetuity.

What’s more, we make our fearless, fiercely independent journalism free to all, with no paywall – so that everyone in the US can have access to responsible, fact-based news.

Nearly $500m of food aid at risk of spoilage after Trump USAid cuts
read more

What We Know About the Munich Car Attack

At least 36 people were injured when an Afghan asylum seeker drove a car into a union march. The police said the driver confessed.

On Thursday morning, a 24-year-old Afghan refugee drove into a union demonstration in central Munich, injuring nearly 40 people. The police say they are investigating whether the driver, who confessed to a deliberate attack, acted alone. The attack happened just 10 days before federal elections that have been focused on migration, and the crash could loom large in the campaign’s final days.

At around 10:30 a.m. Thursday, officers in a police cruiser at the tail end of a union march in central Munich noticed a two-door Mini Cooper coming up from behind. The car sped up to pass the cruiser and plowed into the back of the marchers. Witnesses said they heard the Mini rev up as it drove into the crowd. The police fired a single shot as they went to arrest the driver.

Ambulances and a helicopter arrived at the scene. Police set up a temporary post in a nearby restaurant, where they asked witnesses to come forward, and set up an online portal for uploading any video or pictures of the attack. Officers also used dogs to search the car.

On Friday, the police said that 36 people had been injured, including several children. A 12-year-old girl, who was severely injured, was still in intensive care.

The car plowed into a crowd of union members and supporters and their families. Verdi, one of the biggest unions in Germany, had called a one-day strike for some public sector workers, including those employed in day care, garbage collection and city administration.

The roughly 1,500 marchers were being accompanied by police officers as they walked down a public street.

The office was investigating him on the suspicion of 36 counts of both attempted homicide and of causing dangerous bodily harm. After the driver confessed to the attack, the authorities said they believed he had religious motives and an “Islamist orientation.”

Investigators said they found a message on his cellphone in which he had said goodbye to a loved one, saying “I might not be around tomorrow.”

However, investigators, still combing through his digital devices, said they had not found a connection with the Islamic State or other terrorist organizations.

This is at least the fifth major random attack by a Middle Eastern or Afghan migrant in the last nine months. In late May, an Afghan migrant killed a police officer and wounded several participants in a far-right demonstration in Mannheim. In August, a Syrian refugee killed three and injured eight in a stabbing spree in Solingen. In December, a man from Saudi Arabia used an S.U.V. to kill six people and injure 300 by driving into a Christmas market in Magdeburg. Last month, an Afghan refugee with an apparent mental illness used a kitchen knife to kill a toddler and a man who had rushed in to help in a city park in a small town in Bavaria.

These attacks have helped increase the popularity of the far-right Alternative for Germany party, known as the AfD, which has made limiting migration one of its key planks. Last month, Friedrich Merz, who leads the conservative Christian Democrats and is expected to be Germany’s next chancellor, broke a taboo by voting in Parliament with the AfD on migration measures. While he was criticized by hundred thousands of protesters who took to the streets soon after, his vote showed how much the issue of limiting immigration has become mainstream, even though the number of those seeking asylum has been dropping.

The German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, said on Thursday that the attacker should be punished and sent back to Afghanistan.

Christopher F. Schuetze is a reporter for The Times based in Berlin, covering politics, society and culture in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

What We Know About the Munich Car Attack
read more

How pause in US foreign aid is impacting South, Central Asia

In Kabul, Afghanistan, a major midwifery program — girls’ only higher education option — has closed.

Across Pakistan, dozens of development programs have ground to a halt.

In Bangladesh, a health research center has laid off more than 1,000 employees.

The fallout comes two weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration suspended foreign aid amid a widespread review, leaving thousands of development programs in limbo.

“I’m in shock,” said a student at the USAID-funded midwifery school in Kabul, speaking anonymously. “This was the last remaining option for girls to receive an education and get a job.”

“People keep calling and asking, ‘When is the program going to restart?'” said the head of a USAID-backed education nonprofit in Afghanistan, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The freeze follows a Jan. 20 executive order issued by Trump that suspended all foreign aid pending a 30-day review.

The president said the review was necessary because “the United States foreign aid industry and bureaucracy are not aligned with American interests, and in many cases, antithetical to American values.” The executive order said the current setup “serves to destabilize world peace by promoting ideas in foreign countries” that undermine “harmonious” international relations.

Now, U.S. government agencies involved in delivering foreign assistance must decide by April 30 to keep, change or end their foreign aid programs.

U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by country.
U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by country.

The aid suspension marks a sharp break with decades of U.S. foreign policy. Historically, the U.S. has been the world’s biggest foreign aid donor, with $68 billion in aid in 2023.

The offices of USAID, the lead foreign aid agency, remain closed. Although the State Department has issued a broad exemption to “lifesaving” humanitarian programs such as emergency food distribution in Afghanistan, most programs on the ground remain closed.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has taken over as acting head of USAID, said that while he backs foreign assistance, “every dollar” spent on foreign assistance must advance U.S. national interest.

“We are not walking away from foreign aid,” Rubio told Scott Jennings on Sirius XM Patriot 125 on Monday. “We are walking away from foreign aid that’s dumb, that’s stupid, that wastes American taxpayer money.”

USAID is recognized globally as a premier development agency, but critics at home and abroad have long accused it of throwing American taxpayer money into wasteful projects.

To highlight this, the White House last week issued a list of USAID programs involving “waste and abuse,” including $1.5 million “to advance diversity, equity and inclusion” in Serbia; $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia; and $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt.

Foreign aid defenders acknowledge the waste, but they argue these projects represent a fraction of the $68 billion U.S. aid program.

U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by sector.
U.S. foreign assistance to South and Central Asia, by sector.

South Asia

Though U.S. aid to South and Central Asian nations has declined recently, the region still gets billions annually, with Afghanistan the largest regional recipient.

The country, which received $1.3 billion in 2023, now faces a wave of program shutdowns. While emergency humanitarian aid continues after a brief interruption, development programs from child and maternal health to education have stopped.

The impact has been wide-ranging. The United Nations Population Fund has frozen all U.S.-backed programs in Afghanistan, potentially leaving more than 9 million people cut off from health services, according to regional director, Pio Smith.

The UNFPA, which Republicans have long accused of promoting coercive family planning practices, relies on U.S. assistance for almost a third of its humanitarian operations. The agency, which denies the charge, is likely to lose all that support, impacting its work across the region.

Education is another casualty of the aid suspension in Afghanistan. The American University of Afghanistan, established in 2006 with a USAID grant and now operating out of Qatar, has reportedly suspended classes. A university spokesperson could not be reached for comment.

Meanwhile in Bangladesh, the Asian University for Women is scrambling to keep hundreds of Afghan students after U.S. funding dried up. To cover the funding shortfall, the university has launched a $7 million appeal.

“We cannot and will not send these students back to an uncertain and oppressive future,” the university said in a statement.

Bangladesh, despite its $437 billion economy, is also feeling the pinch. The country is a U.S. ally and South Asia’s largest recipient of U.S. aid after Afghanistan, with more than $500 million supporting a wide range of programs from emergency food assistance to fighting tuberculosis and pandemic influenza.

In Pakistan, more than three dozen USAID-funded projects have reportedly shut down in recent days. A burns and plastic surgery center in the northwestern city of Peshawar, built with a $15 million USAID grant, faces an uncertain future.

“At the moment, I don’t know what’s going to happen to the whole program, but I’m hopeful that the program will move forward,” Dr. Tahmeedullah, the center’s director, said in an interview.

Central Asia

In Central Asia, where five former Soviet republics received about $235 million in 2023, nearly every USAID-funded program and initiative has been stopped, according to local news reports.

“From what I’ve gathered, all types of programs and initiatives have been suspended as of now,” said Alisher Khamidov, a Kyrgyzstan-based consultant who follows USAID projects in the region.

The suspensions include critical health initiatives such as USAID’s $18 million-$20 million “TB-Free” programs in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, both launched in 2023.

“This five-year project has special significance for Uzbekistan as it was one of the few projects tackling TB in the country,” Khamidov said in an interview last week with VOA.

In a statement, a State Department spokesperson said, “We are reviewing all foreign assistance programs to ensure they are efficient and consistent with U.S. foreign policy under the America First agenda.”

USAID has poured billions of dollars into many regional development programs since the early 1990s, including initiatives to promote democratization and civil society. Those efforts, however, represent a fraction of the total aid. Today, the agency is largely focused on agriculture and health projects, according to Khamidov.

Across the region, USAID programs have long faced allegations of waste and abuse, with numerous examples uncovered by the agency’s own inspector general.

Nowhere has the alleged abuse been starker than in Afghanistan, where the Taliban have been accused of siphoning of millions of dollars in U.S. aid funneled through U.N. agencies.

Some Taliban opponents have welcomed the aid freeze, arguing that it could force the group to accede to international demands. Others, such as former Afghan Vice President Amrullah Saleh, say it could level the political playing field in the country.

“The dismantling of USAID clears the path for the rise of genuine leaders in Afghanistan,” Saleh wrote on X.

Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, says a multibillion-dollar program can inevitably lead to waste and abuse. He told VOA that foreign aid can showcase U.S. goodwill but also cause diplomatic friction over policy and cultural issues.

Clark said that though the aid pause should have been less abrupt, a thorough review of the program is necessary.

“It makes sense to stop as a new administration comes in and reassess where the money is going, where it’s being allocated,” he said.

VOA’s Afghan, Deewa and Urdu services and correspondent Vero Balderas contributed to this report.

How pause in US foreign aid is impacting South, Central Asia
read more

‘Please don’t do this’: Afghan families in Pakistan caught in crackdown

By

Al Jazeera

Islamabad, Pakistan – When Salima Ahmad* noticed a three-day gap between the expiry of her family’s visas and the date on a document proving that they had applied for renewals, her heart filled with dread. An Afghan citizen living in Pakistan since 2022, Ahmad feared that authorities would arrest her family for residing in the country illegally.

On February 7, just two days after their visas expired, her fears became reality.

A group of police officials, including female officers, raided her rented house, identifying her family as undocumented residents. Despite her pleas and attempts to show that their passports had been sent for visa renewal, the police took her husband away.

“I kept imploring, pleading for his release. I tried to show them my documentation and proof that we had applied for visa renewal, but they didn’t listen,” Ahmad told Al Jazeera.

The policewomen then told Ahmad to pack up her children’s belongings, warning that she would also be taken to a camp for refugees and deportees set up on Islamabad’s outskirts.

Advertisement

“I begged them not to do this. My children would be traumatised. But they eventually put us in a van and took us away,” she said.

After spending two days in a tent at the camp situated in Islamabad’s outskirts, Ahmad only managed to return home two days later by arranging a 60,000-rupee ($216) bribe.

“I had to ask my relatives, who came to check on us, to arrange this loan. Only then were we allowed to go home,” she said. For now, the family has passports back, with visas stamped for one more month, at the end of which Salima fears a repeat of the humiliating and scary experience they endured in early February.

Ahmad’s story is one of many, as thousands of Afghan citizens in Pakistan, many of whom fled following the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in August 2021, now face an uncertain future under a recent government notification.

In a two-page document issued by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s office last month, the Pakistani government outlined a three-phase plan to send back Afghan citizens living in the country.

The first phase involves the “immediate” deportation of all undocumented Afghan citizens. This includes 800,000 Afghans who did not enter the country on valid visas but who, since 2017, have been granted Afghan Citizen Cards (ACC) by the government of Pakistan itself.

The second phase focuses on Afghan citizens who hold so-called Proof of Registration or PoR cards, first issued in 2006. The final phase will target Afghan citizens who might relocate to third countries.

Advertisement

If the plan is carried out as envisaged, only valid visa holders will remain in the country – none of the other refugees who entered Pakistan under duress without proper documentation will be allowed to stay.

The notification in effect escalates a previously stop-start approach to expelling Afghan refugees. Originally implemented in late 2023, the plan has already led to more than 800,000 Afghan nationals returning to Afghanistan over the past 18 months, according to the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR).

History of hosting refugees

Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghan refugees since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Over the next 20 years, as civil war engulfed Afghanistan and the Taliban first took control in 1996, successive waves of refugees arrived in Pakistan.

After the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 following the 9/11 attacks, the Taliban’s fall led to the establishment of a civilian government, prompting thousands of Afghans to return home.

Ahmad, who first moved to Pakistan as a seven-year-old in 1997, was among those who resettled in Kabul in 2010. After the family moved, she completed a business degree and started working for Afghanistan’s Ministry of Finance under President Ashraf Ghani.

“I was happily living in Afghanistan at the time. My mother and two sisters relocated to the United States around 2019, but I was comfortable in Kabul,” she said.

However, the Taliban’s stunning return to power in August 2021 triggered another wave of displacement, with between 600,000 and 800,000 Afghans seeking refuge in Pakistan.

Advertisement

Pakistan currently hosts nearly more than 2.5 million Afghans, according to government estimates. Among them, about 1.3 million possess a UNHCR-issued Proof of Registration (PoR) card, first introduced in 2006, while another 800,000 hold an ACC, issued in 2017. All of them, until now, held documents that for all purposes were deemed as certificates of legitimate residence in Pakistan. Now they face an uncertain future under the three-stage “relocation” plan.

Those who arrived after the August 2021 Taliban takeover have had to rely on visa renewals to remain in Pakistan, a process that is expensive, unpredictable and fraught with delays.

While the official visa renewal fee is $20, Ahmad says submitting passports through legal channels often results in prolonged confiscation or outright rejection, putting applicants at risk of detention. So they pay visa agents to expedite the process.

“We have to pay anywhere between 15,000 and 20,000 rupees ($54 to $72) to renew our visas. It used to be valid for six months, but since January this year, the government has only been granting one-month visas,” she lamented.

Strained relations and growing crackdowns

Once considered one of the Afghan Taliban’s closest allies, Pakistan has seen relations with its neighbour deteriorate over the past three years.

Islamabad blames Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers for failing to curb the activities of the Pakistani Taliban, or Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a group that emerged in 2007 and has since carried out hundreds of attacks against Pakistani security forces.

Advertisement

In 2024 alone, Pakistan has witnessed more than 500 attacks, resulting in more than 1,500 deaths among civilians and law enforcement personnel.

The Pakistani government has frequently accused Afghan citizens of involvement in these attacks and claims Kabul provides shelter to TTP, a charge the Afghan Taliban denies.

But the government’s recent notification suggests that Afghan refugees now find themselves in the middle of these bilateral tensions.

Afghan citizens holding PoR cards until now have enjoyed some rights, such as the ability to open bank accounts and the chance to register in Pakistan’s citizen database. Now, suddenly, they’re outsiders, and in the queue for expulsion.

In July 2023, following a visit by UNHCR chief Filippo Grandi, Pakistan extended PoR card validity until June 30, 2025. The latest government notification suggests that there is no plan, as of now, to extend their stay any further.

Ikramullah Jamil*, a 31-year-old Afghan citizen born in Pakistan, has lived there nearly all his life, except for six years between 2015 and 2021, when he relocated to Afghanistan with his family.

Jamil and his family had to move out after the Pakistani military launched a major military offensive in the country’s northwestern province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where they used to live.

But after the fall of Kabul, Jamil, the eldest among his eight siblings, chose to return to Pakistan.

“Because of my language skills and connections, I’ve been able to support our Afghan community since 2021. But now, with the government’s vague policies, I fear I could also be at risk of deportation,” Jamil told Al Jazeera.

Advertisement

Even the UNHCR isn’t entirely clear about Pakistan’s plans, said Qaiser Afridi, the spokesperson for the UN agency in Pakistan.

“We are constantly in touch with them [the government] to explain what exactly the plan is, but we have not been given a clear answer,” Afridi told Al Jazeera. “There are several categories of people who are documented and registered as per requirement, so what does the government mean by removing them from Islamabad or Rawalpindi?”

The UNHCR says more than 800 Afghan nationals, including women and children, have already been deported from Islamabad and Rawalpindi since the start of the year.

Praising Pakistan’s “generosity” in hosting millions of Afghan refugees for the past four decades, Phillipa Chandler, the head of the UNHCR in Pakistan, urged the authorities to be more considerate.

“Forced return to Afghanistan could place some people at increased risk. We urge Pakistan to continue to provide safety to Afghans at risk, irrespective of their documentation status,” Chandler said, according to a UNHCR press release.

Looming deadline

The government notification from January has also set a March 31 deadline for Afghan citizens awaiting resettlement in third countries. Those who fail to leave by then risk deportation.

Afridi called the situation “complicated”, noting that thousands of Afghans arrived after August 2021 with legitimate asylum claims or pending resettlement cases.

“There are people whose resettlement cases are still being processed, and others who fear for their lives if they return to Afghanistan,” he said.

Advertisement

Since 2021, nearly 500,000 Afghan nationals have contacted the UNHCR for assistance.

“We have issued documentation to these people; to show they are listed in our system. All we want from the government is to at least recognise this, and to not arrest or deport them,” Afridi said.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs earlier this month stated that “almost 80,000 Afghans” have already been resettled in other countries, while 40,000 remain in Pakistan awaiting relocation.

Jamil, currently working for a media outlet, had applied for the US Welcome Corps, a United States government programme for refugees.

“I applied for this programme last year and I even received an email from the State Department that my case will get processed. I had my first interview in December, and I was informed that my settlement process will start in a few days,” he says.

But with the new Trump administration in office, Jamil is unsure what the future holds for him, as the new US president has put a pause on the refugee programme.

“After the new president came in, I was informed that the programme is on hold. I don’t know what will happen to that. Now, my PoR is expiring, and I have no idea what to do.”

Names marked with an asterisk* have been changed to protect identities.

Source: Al Jazeera
‘Please don’t do this’: Afghan families in Pakistan caught in crackdown
read more

UNAMA condemns Kabul and Kunduz attacks amid growing security concerns in Afghanistan

By Fidel Rahmati

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) condemned the recent explosions in Kabul and Kunduz provinces. UNAMA expressed sympathy to the families of the victims and condemned the violence.

The mission stressed that the security and well-being of the people must be protected, emphasizing that there is no place for violence in Afghanistan.

UNAMA called for the safeguarding of Afghan citizens’ safety and reiterated its stance against violent actions in the country, reaffirming its commitment to peace and stability.

On Thursday, a blast occurred near the Ministry of Urban Development in Kabul, resulting in the death of one person. This follows an explosion in Kunduz two days earlier.

The Islamic State (ISIS) claimed responsibility for the explosion in Kunduz, which resulted in five deaths and numerous injuries, further indicating a deterioration in security.

These recent attacks highlight the ongoing security challenges in Afghanistan, particularly with the presence of ISIS and other militant groups. The situation calls for urgent measures to ensure the safety of civilians and to address the growing instability.

The presence of ISIS in Afghanistan has been a significant concern, with the group actively carrying out attacks in various provinces. Their ability to claim responsibility for recent bombings highlights their continued threat to the country’s security.

Despite the Taliban’s denial of ISIS’s role in many attacks, the increasing frequency of such incidents suggests that the group’s influence is expanding. The Taliban’s failure to contain ISIS is raising doubts about their control over the country’s security.

UNAMA condemns Kabul and Kunduz attacks amid growing security concerns in Afghanistan
read more