Report says donors ‘turning away’ from Taliban-ruled Afghanistan

By

Published On 23 Feb 2023

A new report by the International Crisis Group warns against international donors cutting aid to Afghanistan in the wake of the Taliban’s curbs on women’s education and ability to work at NGOs, instead arguing for Western countries to find a “liminal space between pariah and legitimate status” to respond to the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

The report, released on Thursday, focused primarily on two Taliban edicts announced in December – the first suspending female education at private and public universities, and the second banning Afghan women from working at local and international NGOs. The moves led to protests and global condemnation, while sounding a possible death knell for the Taliban’s initial openness to engage with the international community following its takeover of the country in August 2021.

Accompanying the Taliban’s clampdown has been a reassessment of international aid from key international government donors, according to the report’s authors. That aid, despite being immediately paused in the wake of the group’s rise to power, had resumed amid concerns over widespread hunger and poverty in the country of about 40 million.

“Donors are turning away from Afghanistan, disgusted by the Taliban’s restrictions on women’s basic freedoms,” Graeme Smith, Crisis Group’s Senior Consultant on Afghanistan, said in a statement accompanying the report.

“However, cutting aid to send a message about women’s rights will only make the situation worse for all Afghans,” he added. “The most principled response to the Taliban’s misogyny would be finding ways to mitigate the harms inflicted on women and other vulnerable groups.”

The report – which drew on dozens of interviews with “Afghan and international women activists, current and former Afghan officials, teachers, students, aid workers, human rights defenders, development officials, diplomats, business leaders and other interlocutors” – noted Western governments in the second half of 2022 warned aid agencies of a growing sense of donor fatigue towards Afghanistan. It did not name the governments to which it referred.

The authors further warned that following the most recent rights rollbacks, “many Western politicians fear voters will not accept the idea of their taxes helping a country ruled by an odious regime,” while adding that “consultations in January 2023 among major donors produced initial thinking that aid should be trimmed back to send a message to the Taliban, although the governments involved did not agree on which budgets to cut”.

Again, the report did not name the countries in question.

The United Nations, which has already had to roll back some aid operations in the wake of the ban on NGO workers, has appealed for $4.6bn to aid Afghanistan. The sum is the largest request for a single country ever. The UN has warned that 28 million people are in need of humanitarian aid, accounting for two-thirds of the country’s population.

But Crisis Group warned that “Western governments seemed poised to fall significantly short” of that appeal.

The report authors added that options discussed in the wake of the December edict have included “deepening sanctions, cutting aid or levying other forms of punishment in response”.

They noted that the G7 grouping of the world’s most wealthy countries had said there would be “consequences for how our countries engage with the Taliban” in the wake of the December edicts. The grouping had provided $3bn in humanitarian funding for Afghanistan in 2022, the report noted.

In the United States, which imposed a raft of new sanctions on the Taliban in October over their treatment of women, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said: “There are going to be costs if this is not reversed”.

The report’s authors argued any approach that included short-term cuts to aid in the hopes of undermining the Taliban’s authority would further harm those targeted by the Taliban’s recent moves.

“Testing such assumptions would involve a high-stakes gamble with potentially millions of human lives. Win or lose, the costs of taking the gamble would be paid in large part by Afghan women, as the burdens of the crisis fall disproportionately on them,” the report said.

Change of approach

Instead, Crisis Group argued that continuing to offer humanitarian aid, while supporting longer-term development aid, would address the population’s immediate needs, while undermining the “Taliban’s overheated rhetoric about a titanic clash between Islam and the West”.

The authors further cautioned against expecting outside pressure to change the Taliban’s approach, highlighting the opaque nature of the group’s decision-making. They noted its reclusive leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, has appeared to insist on the strict measures out of “personal conviction and to assert his authority over the movement and the country”.

“As the world considers its options, the idea of coaxing the Taliban into behaving like an internationally acceptable government should be set aside for the moment,” the report said.

There is little room for opposing views within the Taliban leadership, it added, and influence from outside Muslim figures has proven ineffective as “the Taliban’s policies are drawn not only from their atypical interpretation of Islam, but also from aspects of local culture”.

Meanwhile, political talks with the Taliban aimed at creating a “roadmap” to normalisation have all but stalled. It also remains unclear how much money the group may be earning from narcotics and other forms of smuggling, bringing into question how much sanctions will actually affect the upper echelons of leadership.

“Western policymakers must stand up for Afghan women and girls. At the same time, they should be careful to avoid self-defeating policies,” the report concluded.

The authors added: “The Taliban should find a better way of making decisions, instead of following the whims of a leader who has proven his determination to oppress women and block the rebuilding of his country. Until that happens, the future of Afghanistan looks bleak.”

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA
Report says donors ‘turning away’ from Taliban-ruled Afghanistan
read more

Judge Rejects Bid by Sept. 11 Families to Seize Frozen Afghan Central Bank Funds

The New York Times

A lawyer for the lead group of victim relatives who had sought $3.5 billion in frozen assets said they would appeal.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge in New York on Tuesday rejected the effort by relatives of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to seize $3.5 billion in frozen Afghan central bank funds to pay off judgment debts owed by the Taliban, dealing a sharp blow to a high-stakes bid to compensate the families for their losses in the worst terrorist attack in American history.

In a 30-page opinion, Judge George B. Daniels of the Southern District of New York ruled that federal courts lacked legal jurisdiction to seize the funds. He also said that awarding them to the families would be unconstitutional because it would mean effectively recognizing the militants as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

The Sept. 11 families and insurance companies “are entitled to collect on their default judgments and be made whole for the worst terrorist attack in our nation’s history, but they cannot do so with the funds of the central bank of Afghanistan,” Judge Daniels wrote.

Under federal law and the Constitution, he added, “the Taliban — not the former Islamic Republic of Afghanistan or the Afghan people — must pay for the Taliban’s liability in the 9/11 attacks.”

The ruling by Judge Daniels adopted the recommendation of a magistrate judge, Sarah Netburn, who analyzed the matter in a report last August that also found that the families were not entitled to the funds. But it left the decision to him.

Judge Daniels’s opinion was the first definitive ruling in a complex saga at the intersection of foreign policy, international economics, counterterrorism and domestic politics, a situation arising from a country being seized by a terrorist organization and left without a government that is recognized as legitimate.

“This decision deprives over 10,000 members of the 9/11 community of their right to collect compensation from the Taliban, a terrorist group which was found liable for the 9/11 attacks on America,” Mr. Wolosky said.

When the government of Afghanistan collapsed as the Taliban took over in August 2021, there was about $7 billion in Afghan central bank funds deposited at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. A group of Sept. 11 families that years earlier had sued the Taliban for their losses, winning a default judgment when the militants failed to show up in court, then moved to seize the funds to pay off the judgment debt.

Last February, President Biden froze the funds, reserving about half to be spent on helping the Afghan people while leaving the remaining $3.5 billion for the families to keep going after in court.

It is not clear what will happen to the $3.5 billion the president set aside for the families to keep pursuing if their appeals ultimately fail. One possibility is that Mr. Biden or a successor could use executive power to add it to the half he set aside for Afghans and which is now controlled by a special fund in Switzerland.

The effort by the initial group of Sept. 11 families — known as the Havlish plaintiffs and represented by Mr. Wolosky’s law firm — to seize the money was disputed for several reasons.

Other plaintiff groups of Sept. 11 families sought an equal share in any proceeds, but under New York law the Havlish group, made up of about 150 people linked to 47 estates from the nearly 3,000 people killed, could get paid in full first. Ultimately, the Havlish group negotiated a deal with other groups in which they would receive a lesser share in exchange for their support.

Another faction of relatives, however, joined exiled Afghans, among others, in urging the court to reject giving any of the money to Sept. 11 families. It belonged to the Afghan people, they argued, and should go toward helping them during a humanitarian crisis caused by the collapse of the country’s economy.

Agreeing with Judge Netburn’s earlier report and recommendation, Judge Daniels expressed sympathy for both the families and the people of Afghanistan suffering anew at the hands of the Taliban. But he said the law precluded the court from awarding any of the Afghan central bank funds to the Sept. 11 plaintiffs to pay the Taliban’s debts.

For one thing, he wrote, because the Afghan central bank — known as Da Afghanistan Bank, or DAB — is an instrument of a foreign state, American courts lack jurisdiction to seize its property under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

While another law called the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act can make an exception to that rule when there is a judgment against a state sponsor of terrorism, he wrote, the Sept. 11 families hold judgments against the Taliban, not the sovereign nation of Afghanistan. Moreover, he noted, Afghanistan has never been designated a state sponsor of terrorism.

Even if he was wrong about that and the court did have jurisdiction over the bank and its assets, Judge Daniels wrote, the Constitution prevented him from making the necessary finding that the bank is an “agency or instrumentality” of the Taliban.

“Finding that the Taliban controls DAB or can use DAB to advance its goals implies that the Taliban is Afghanistan’s government,” he wrote. “The Constitution vests this authority to recognize governments in the executive branch alone.”

Judge Rejects Bid by Sept. 11 Families to Seize Frozen Afghan Central Bank Funds
read more

Pakistan defense minister in Kabul over shut border crossing

By MUNIR AHED and RAHIM FAIEZ

Associated Press
22 Feb 2023

ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan’s defense minister was in Afghanistan on Wednesday, meeting with officials there in an effort to resolve this week’s closure by the Taliban administration of a key border crossing between the two neighboring countries, officials said.

Defense Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif’s trip to Kabul and his meeting with Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban-appointed deputy prime minister for economic affairs, comes as tensions have increased between Afghanistan and Pakistan in recent months.

Taliban security forces on Sunday closed the Torkham border crossing with Pakistan and on Monday traded fire with Pakistani border guards. The exchange wounded a Pakistani soldier. The border crossing has since remained shut, hampering trade on both sides of the troubled boundary.

The Taliban government in Kabul said Torkham was closed because of Pakistan’s alleged refusal to allow Afghan patients and their caretakers to enter Pakistan for medical care without travel documents.

For Pakistan, the crossing is a vital commercial artery and a trade route to Central Asian countries. But Islamabad has also accused the Afghan Taliban of providing sanctuary for Pakistani militants whose cross-border attacks into Pakistan have led to a spike in violence in the region. Since Sunday’s closure of Torkham, more than 6,000 trucks with goods, including vegetables, fruit and other perishable food items, have been stuck on the Pakistani side of the border.

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry confirmed Asif was in Kabul, saying only that he was there to discuss security-related matters, including counter-terrorism measures. Two Pakistani security officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss border issues, told The Associated Press that Torkham’s closure was top of the agenda.

In Kabul, a statement issued by Baradar’s office about Asif’s visit said the two sides discussed the current situation at the crossing.

According to the statement, Baradar told the Pakistani delegation that “necessary facilities should be provided for all passengers” at Torkham and also at Spin Boldak, another trade route located to the south, across from Chaman in Pakistan’s restive southwestern Baluchistan province.

Baradar was also quoted as saying “special facilities” should be provided for the transportation of patients needing emergency medical care.

“The Pakistani side assured the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan that it would resolve solving the mentioned issues and … work quickly on this matter,” the statement said. Baradar also stressed it was important “to separate commercial and economic issues from political and security issues so that it does not become prey to politics.”

Meanwhile, Ziaul Haq Sarhadi, a director at the Pakistan-Afghanistan joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry, deplored the traffic halt at Torkham.

“Miles after miles you can see trucks loaded with various items, and the drivers are waiting for the reopening of the Torkham border,” he told the AP. He said Afghan traders were also worried as the closure has caused problems on both sides of the border.

Closures, cross-border fire and shootouts are common along the Afghan-Pakistan border. Each side has in the past closed both Torkham and Chaman over various reasons.

The Taliban seized power in Afghanistan in August 2021 as U.S. and NATO troops were withdrawing from the country after 20 years of war. Like the rest of the world, Pakistan has so far not recognized Afghanistan’s Taliban government. The international community has been wary of the Taliban’s harsh measures, imposed since their takeover, especially in restricting the rights of women and minorities.___

Associated Press writer Riaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, contributed to this story.

Pakistan defense minister in Kabul over shut border crossing
read more

US judge says 9/11 families not entitled to Afghan bank funds

Al Jazeera

22 February 2023

District judge says victims cannot seize bank’s assets since the US has not recognised the Taliban as a legitimate government.

In the ruling on Tuesday, US District Judge George Daniels said that awarding the families money seized from the Da Afghanistan Bank (DAB) would require an assessment that the Taliban is the legitimate government of Afghanistan, a decision he was “constitutionally restrained” from making.

“The judgment creditors are entitled to collect on their default judgments and be made whole for the worst terrorist attack in our nation’s history, but they cannot do so with the funds of the central bank of Afghanistan,” Daniels wrote.

“The Taliban — not the former Islamic Republic of Afghanistan or the Afghan people — must pay for the Taliban’s liability in the 9/11 attacks,” he added.

In February 2022, the administration of US President Joe Biden issued a controversial executive order stating it would split $7bn in frozen assets from Afghanistan’s central bank between the Afghan people and families of 9/11 victims who sued the Taliban.

While the Taliban was not directly involved in the attacks, lawyers for the families argued it had helped enable al-Qaeda, which mounted the attack, by allowing the group to operate in Afghanistan.

Bilal Askaryar, an Afghan-American activist, told Al Jazeera at the time of the order that the Afghan people “had nothing to do with 9/11” and called the decision a “theft of public funds from an impoverished nation”.

Tuesday’s ruling upholds a previous decision in August 2022, when US Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn also recommended that victims of 9/11 could not seize cash from the Afghan central bank to satisfy court judgements against the Taliban.

Since the Taliban swept aside the US-backed government and took power in August 2021, the Biden administration has not recognised the group as the country’s official ruling party.

In response to the ruling, Lee Wolosky, a lawyer for one creditor group known as the Havlish plaintiffs, called the conclusion “wrongly decided” and said the group would appeal.
“This decision deprives over 10,000 members of the 9/11 community of their right to collect compensation from the Taliban,” he said.

In a statement sent to Al Jazeera via text on Tuesday, Arash Azzizada, co-founder of the US-based Afghans For a Better Tomorrow, welcomed the decision.

“Justice will not be served by raiding the coffers of a people suffering from one of the worst humanitarian crises on the planet,” he said.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA, REUTERS
US judge says 9/11 families not entitled to Afghan bank funds
read more

Clashes Erupt on Durand Line at Torkham Gate

Tolo News

20 Feb 2023

This comes as the Afghanistan Chamber of Commerce and Investment said that the closure of the gate affects the country.

Following the closure of Torkham gate, Islamic Emirate forces and Pakistani border guards engaged in a gun battle, according to local officials.

There are currently no details available about casualties.

The gate was closed after Pakistan denied allowing the Afghan patients to cross the gate, according to the security officials in Nangarhar province.

Meanwhile, hundreds of people including patients have been stranded and the shops are closed.

“The fighting started in between two check posts on the top area. One of them belongs to Pakistan and another belongs to our Ministry of Defense,” said Karimullah Agha, an intelligence officer at the gate.

The closure of the gate caused problems for many people needing medical care abroad and their accompanying relatives. They called on the two sides to reach an agreement over reopening the gate.

“There should be pressure on Pakistan to allow the patients. There are two to three people that are accompanying the patients. Pakistan is not treating us well,” said Najibullah, a patient.

“Based on the agreement that is made between Afghanistan and Pakistan, between 100 to 150 people should be allowed to cross the gate,” said Abdul Malik Samsor, a patient.

This comes as the Afghanistan Chamber of Commerce and Investment said that the closure of the gate affects the country.

“This issue damages both countries because we are transporting goods. We have trade with Pakistan,” said Khanjan Alokozai, a member of the ACCI.

The truck drivers meanwhile said that they would suffer millions of Afs worth of damage if the gate is not reopened.

“If the gate of Torkham is not reopened, we will suffer between 500,000 to 600,000 Afs in transport services on a daily basis,” said Ayoub Khan, a driver.

“You think of it, when the truck is loaded with vegetables and then the vegetables spoil on the way, the owner will heavily suffer from it,” said Lala Mohammad Shah, a driver.

Recently there have been many clashes reported alongside the Durand Line between the Islamic Emirate forces and the Pakistan military.

Clashes Erupt on Durand Line at Torkham Gate
read more

Borrell: ‘Gender Apartheid’ Impacting Aid Operations in Afghanistan

Nearly two months have passed since the suspension of women’s work in non-governmental organizations in Afghanistan.

Josep Borrell Fontelles, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, said that the Islamic Emirate’s recent decision to suspend women’s employment has significantly impacted aid operations in Afghanistan.

Speaking at the press conference, Borrell added that the European Union is committed to continuing humanitarian aid in Afghanistan and that this aid will be monitored.

“And then we went on to discuss the deplorable decision by the Taliban to stop Afghan women from working in aid delivery. In Afghanistan, the Taliban are creating a ‘gender apartheid,’ and this ‘gender apartheid’ is having a significant impact on aid operations in Afghanistan,” Borrell said.

Borrell noted: “On this principle, our support will continue because we don’t want to punish twice the Afghan women, but this has to be closely monitored and decided on a case-by-case basis during a trial period,” he said.

“We hope that Western society will use unusual methods and serious measures that will enable the Afghan women to achieve their most basic right, which is the right to employment, the right to education, and other matters in the Islamic framework,” said Farah Mustafawi, a women’s rights activist.

“The humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan requires considerable international assistance, and the world’s aid should continue without conditions to stop the situation from getting worse,” said Shakir Yaqubi, an economist.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Economy considers the humanitarian aid of the EU important and asked this union to provide its aid in the humanitarian and development sector in Afghanistan.

“We ask that the European Union continue to provide humanitarian and development aid to the people of Afghanistan so that we can take more significant steps toward the nation’s economic self-sufficiency.” said Abdul Latif Nazari, a deputy in the ministry of the economy.

Nearly two months have passed since the suspension of women’s work in non-governmental organizations in Afghanistan.

According to some aid agencies, this suspension has made it more difficult to provide aid to Afghanistan.

Borrell: ‘Gender Apartheid’ Impacting Aid Operations in Afghanistan
read more

Afghanistan Earned 100 Billion Afs in Customs Revenue: Ministry

The new figure shows a significant increase compared to the previous year, according to the spokesman of the MoF, Ahmad Wali Haqmal.

The Ministry of Finance announced that it earned 100 billion Afs in revenue from the custom offices over the past 11 months.

The new figure shows a significant increase compared to the previous year, according to the spokesman of the MoF, Ahmad Wali Haqmal. “The increase in revenue of the customs office shows that professional employees and people committed to their work have been appointed. The corruption has dropped to zero level,” he said.

The Afghanistan Chamber of Commerce and Investment said the reduction in corruption and tariffs has caused a surge in revenue.

“The majority of our exports is out via the north of Afghanistan, and Herat as well as Torkham and Chaman port, from where our transit comes from Karachi (in Pakistan) and Abas port (Iran) from where the commodities come to Nimroz and Herat. We bring all food and heating materials through Hairatan and Aqina ports in the north of the country,” said Khan Jan Alokozai, a member of the ACCI.

This comes as traders called on the Islamic Emirate to provide further facilities for them at transit ports.

“We call on the Islamic Emirate to grow our trade relations with the neighboring countries,” said Zalmai Azimi, a trader.

“We call on the leadership of the Ministry of Finance to reduce the tariffs on vegetables and fruits in Afghanistan,” said Amir Haidar, a trader.

Customs revenue makes up a big part of the Afghan economy and the majority of the revenue is made in Torkham, Islam Qala and Hairatan ports.

Afghanistan Earned 100 Billion Afs in Customs Revenue: Ministry
read more

Traders troubled after Taliban shut Afghan-Pakistan crossing

By RIAZ KHAN

Associate Press
21 Feb 2023

PESHAWAR, Pakistan (AP) — The main crossing on the Afghan-Pakistan border remained shut Tuesday for the third straight day, officials said, after Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers earlier this week closed the key trade route and exchanged fire with Pakistani border guards.

The closure has added to increasing tensions between the two neighboring countries and concerns for traders, for whom the Torkham crossing is a key commercial artery. Trucks carrying various items also travel to Central Asian countries from Pakistan, through Torkham crossing point and Afghanistan.

On the Pakistani side of the border, in northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, many merchants watched their trucks on Tuesday, loaded with fresh produce that could soon spoil, and waited for the crossing to reopen.

The Taliban closed Torkham on Sunday, angered by Pakistan’s alleged refusal to allow Afghan patients and their caretakers to enter Pakistan for medical care without travel documents. On Monday, Taliban fighters and Pakistani guards exchanged fire. There was no word on casualties on either side.

for the crossing to reopen, he added. “It is causing problems for traders on both sides.”

There were also vehicles waiting on the other side of the border, in Afghanistan’s eastern Nangarhar province, but the Taliban have not commented on the issue.

Siddiqullah Quraishi, the Taliban’s appointed official at the Nangahar’s information and culture department, said Pakistan has not been abiding by its “commitments, so the crossing point was shut down.” He did not elaborate but advised Afghans to avoid traveling to the crossing until further notice.

Closures, cross-border fire and shootouts are common along the Afghan-Pakistan border. Each side has in the past closed Torkham, and also the Chaman crossing in southwestern Pakistan, over various reasons.

The Taliban seized power in Afghanistan in August 2021 as U.S. and NATO troops were withdrawing from the country after 20 years of war. Like the rest of the world, Pakistan has so far not recognized Afghanistan’s Taliban government. The international community has been wary of the Taliban’s harsh measures, imposed since their takeover, especially in restricting the rights of women and minorities.

Associated Press writer Rahim Faiez in Islamabad contributed to this story.

Traders troubled after Taliban shut Afghan-Pakistan crossing
read more

Torkham border crossing between Afghanistan, Pakistan closed

Al Jazeera

It was not immediately clear whether Afghan or Pakistani authorities closed the Torkham border crossing, near the Khyber Pass, but Monday’s move comes after relations between Afghanistan’s ruling Taliban and Pakistan deteriorated sharply.

Mullah Mohammad Siddiq, a Taliban-appointed commissioner at Torkham, said Pakistan has not been abiding by its “commitments … so the crossing point was shut down”, The Associated Press reported.

Siddiq advised Afghans to avoid travelling to the crossing, located on Afghanistan’s side in the country’s eastern Nangarhar province, until further notice.

Khalid Khan, a Pakistani police official, confirmed the border closure and what he described as intermittent exchanges of fire at Torkham, located in Pakistan’s northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

Disputes linked to the 2,600km (1,615 miles) border have been a bone of contention between the neighbours for decades. The Torkham border point is the main point of transit for travellers and goods between Pakistan and landlocked Afghanistan.

Border clashes

Mohammad Ali Shinwari, a resident of Landi Kotal on the Pakistani side, said the border was closed late on Sunday and gunfire erupted early on Monday, Reuters news agency reported.

“When we heard gunshots in the morning, we got worried and believed that troops of the two countries might have started fighting,” he said.

Clashes between Afghan and Pakistani security forces have also at times closed the second most important crossing between the two countries.

Pakistan has witnessed a surge in armed attacks since November, when the Pakistan Taliban, known by the acronym TTP, ended a months-long ceasefire agreement with the government.

The outlawed TTP is a separate armed group allied with the Taliban in Afghanistan. It has been waging a rebellion against the state of Pakistan for more than a decade.

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said at the Munich Security Conference on Sunday that the risks of armed fighting stemming from Afghan soil could affect the world.

SOURCE: NEWS AGENCIES
Torkham border crossing between Afghanistan, Pakistan closed
read more

Inside the Taliban campaign to forge a religious emirate

Story by Susannah George

The Washington Post

Feb. 18, 2023

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — When the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, the group quickly launched what officials called a “purification” campaign aimed at stripping the country of civil laws and institutions to build an entirely Islamic society.

A year and a half later, the Taliban has gutted the country’s justice system in its campaign to forge a religious emirate, by scrapping the constitution and replacing the legal code with rules based on a draconian interpretation of Islamic law. The Taliban has filled prisons to overflowing, deprived men and women of basic civil rights, and eroded social safety nets meant to protect the most vulnerable Afghans. It is also seeking to transform the media, using it to promote its vision for the country and restricting content deemed un-Islamic, including music and the presence of women.

The Taliban’s critics say this effort has replaced a social order based on rights with one maintained by fear and intimidation. Taliban officials and some Afghans, however, credit the campaign with improving security and eliminating corruption.

“We have returned humanity to the country,” said Mawlewi Ahmad Shah Fedayii, a prominent imam with close ties to the Taliban, speaking outside his mosque in Afghanistan’s second city of Kandahar. He said Taliban rule has improved the lives of all Afghans, including women, and given the people greater freedom of speech. “Before, women were forced to work, to labor, but now they are kept at home and treated like a queen,” he said.

Fedayii, who has preached in Kandahar for over a decade, blamed Afghanistan’s problems under the previous government on “man-made laws,” which allowed corruption, violence and poverty to flourish. “They had a constitution half taken from Islamic law, but the other half was corrupt laws,” he said. “If you had half a glass of pure milk and then poured dirty water into it, you wouldn’t drink it. It makes the entire drink dirty. It was the same with the constitution.”

Taliban judges say they either burned the books containing laws from the previous government when they moved into abandoned courthouses after the 2021 takeover or left the legal volumes untouched on the shelves.

Within recent months, the purification campaign has escalated further, with the Taliban formalizing these legal and policy changes. The group’s supreme leader, Haibatullah Akhundzada, has become more vocal about subjecting alleged criminals to Islamic law, and this has translated, for instance, into more frequent public beatings.

“The rulers are compelled to make efforts to create an Islamic sharia system and bring reforms to [Afghan] society,” a deputy Taliban spokesman, Qari Muhammad Yousef Ahmadi, told The Washington Post. He said imposing the Taliban’s interpretation of Islamic law “is a blessing for the government, the people, and it pleases God.”

Only Allah’s law

“Courts are the main source of purification for an Islamic government,” said Mufti Fazlullah Asim, a 35-year-old judge in the criminal wing of the Kandahar court.

In the main courtroom, the outlines of the previous government’s crest — hastily painted over — are visible above empty bookshelves. In Asim’s office, his desk is stacked with handwritten statements and photocopied forms.

Before the collapse of the previous Afghan government, Asim ran Taliban social media platforms. Now, he passes judgments based solely on the interpretation of Islamic law he was taught in a Taliban madrassa in the countryside outside Kandahar. “We consult Allah’s law and only Allah’s law,” he said.

Afghan society has yet to become purely Islamic, as shown by the continuing presence of crime, he said; he decides dozens of criminal cases every week. Most are minor, such as petty theft. But he also rules on allegations of murder and extortion and has the authority to order corporal punishments, like public lashings and amputating hands.

With each decision, Asim said he believes he is bringing the country one step closer to eliminating the outside influences introduced by U.S. and NATO forces after they invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and ended the Taliban’s previous time in power.

“It will take some time, because over the past 20 years our people were trained with a different mind-set,” he said.

So far, the Taliban’s purification campaign has yet to reprise the brutality of the group’s earlier tenure, such as the widespread stoning of women for alleged adultery. But recent changes suggest that the Taliban could be moving in that direction.

Prisons overwhelmed

As Afghanistan’s legal framework shifts, the Taliban is also filling up the same prisons the group emptied more than a year ago when taking power.

“The biggest difference with the inmates now is that we don’t hold political prisoners,” said Naimatullah Siraj, director of Kandahar’s central prison, referring to the Taliban fighters incarcerated by the previous government. Siraj himself was once imprisoned because he was found transporting explosives to build a roadside bomb.

Most of those locked up under Taliban rule are accused of what Siraj called “moral crimes” such as drug abuse and theft. Many were arrested in large sweeps of urban areas conducted by Taliban forces. The Interior Ministry said some 10,000 drug addicts had been “collected” from across the country in the past year. In contrast, under the previous government, apprehended drug users were mostly sent to rehabilitation centers.

The Taliban spokesman, Ahmadi, said prisons and detention centers serve the same purpose as rehabilitation centers, despite the facilities lacking adequate medical personnel and supplies.

The large number of arrests have overwhelmed facilities like Kandahar’s central prison. Siraj said the complex holds more people than it ever did before.

Inside, prison yards and cells are packed. Dozens of young men, many teenagers, crowded recently in the shade of an awning for a class on Islamic values. At the main health clinic, patients filled the hallways, resting on the floor and leaning against walls.

One man crouching outside the doctor’s office said he had been arrested two months earlier and hadn’t seen a judge or been formally charged. Prison guards — who forbade him from giving his name or any further details — confirmed that it is normal for inmates to wait months to be charged because there are so many of them. This wait is legal under Taliban rule.

Prison or death

As advancing Taliban forces moved into cities across Afghanistan, the group’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice closed shelters for women who had escaped abusive relationships. Taliban spokesman Ahmadi refused to answer questions about the closure of women’s shelters, but said women are “not shelterless” in Afghanistan.

One 21-year-old woman recounted how, before the Taliban took power, she had left a physically abusive marriage and took refuge at a women’s shelter. Later, she started working there herself. The job allowed her to provide for her young daughter and mother. But when Taliban fighters took control of her city and closed the shelter, dozens of women were forced out onto the streets, according to the woman, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of Taliban reprisals.

“The Taliban are putting some of them in prison. Others are just being killed,” she said. Some women who previously lived at the shelter were charged with running away from home, others with prostitution.

The woman said she has only managed to avoid arrest because she moves from apartment to apartment every few months with her daughter.

“If I wasn’t able to run away [from my husband’s home] to a safe place, I wouldn’t be alive right now,” she said. “Without shelters for women to go to now, their fate is only prison or death.”

Former social workers, lawyers and other women who had lived at the shelters confirmed that arrests of women trying to escape domestic abuse have risen under the Taliban.

One former social worker said all the women she had counseled under the previous government have disappeared. At least one, she said, was found dead.

“No women have been imprisoned without committing a crime” under the Taliban, Ahmadi said. “No injustices have been done to women here.”

All-female madrassas fill the void

Since taking power, the Taliban has also severely restricted female access to education and barred women from working for humanitarian organizations.

The rulings sparked global outrage and initially forced many aid groups to halt operations delivering assistance to millions of Afghans struggling to keep their families warm and fed. The Taliban has said that other countries should not interfere with its domestic affairs, and, on balance, the international backlash has been relatively modest.

While assurances from local Taliban authorities or ministry-level officials have allowed some women to return to work and aid groups to continue distributions, the restrictions on education have not eased. So, for women determined to continue their studies, the only options left are religious schools called madrassas.

At a girls’ madrassa in Kabul, the classes are packed with students sitting in neat rows bent over religious texts marked with Post-its and notes in the margins. In one room, young women chant Quranic verses into a speaker and rock back and forth hypnotically.

The school’s director, Zarsanga Safi, said attendance has soared since the Taliban takeover.

“The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is cooperating with us,” she said. Licenses to open new religious schools are easier to obtain from Taliban officials, and she said many of her older students have gone on to open their own madrassas. For many of her newest students, the past year was the first time they considered studying the Quran.

Benfsha Sapi, 16, enrolled after the Taliban last year banned secondary education for girls. She said she never considered a religious education before. “In the past, I had other things to do in my life,” she said, dressed in a black robe, gloves and a veil that revealed only her eyes. “But now that I don’t have anything else, I come to this madrassa.”

Raised as a conservative Muslim, she said she was always interested in learning more about Islam, but her dream is to return to high school and one day become a lawyer. “I want to make sure people have their rights respected and protected,” she said. “I care about what is right and what is wrong.”

While she hopes girls will be allowed to resume secondary education so she can study law, Sapi acknowledges that she’s not the same person she was before she began memorizing the Quran. “This school has really changed my life and how I think,” she said. “I know more about my religion now; I have a better understanding of what God says is the correct thing and what is wrong.”

Monitoring for violations

While rulings stripping women of their rights have further undermined the Taliban’s reputation on the international stage, inside Afghanistan the group is overhauling the media to promote a positive image of the emirate, its new leadership and ultraconservative beliefs.

Television programs that the group deems immoral have been outlawed. Afghan films are no longer allowed to include women or music. And Afghan news outlets that broadcast critical stories are routinely threatened with legal action, forcing dozens to shutter, according to former employees.

Ahmadullah Wasiq, director of state media under the Taliban, defended the restrictions and said the role of the press “should be to promote stability and promote our government.” But he said the news outlets that have closed did so because of economic difficulties, not because of Taliban pressure.

Wasiq said the Taliban closely monitors all local and foreign media outlets in Afghanistan for “violations” of Taliban policy such as “insulting anyone in a position of power.”

“If someone goes against the rules by broadcasting content against our values, they will face consequences,” Wasiq said.

“We are committed to freedom of speech,” he added, “but only within our guidelines.”

Haq Nawaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, contributed to this report.

Susannah George is The Washington Post’s Afghanistan and Pakistan bureau chief. She previously headed the Associated Press’s Baghdad bureau and covered national security and intelligence from the AP’s Washington bureau.

 

Inside the Taliban campaign to forge a religious emirate
read more