The Torkham border crossing has been closed for five days, causing significant problems for travelers and traders on both sides of the border. This closure has disrupted normal movement and trade, creating a severe bottleneck for businesses and individuals relying on this route.

According to local sources, the closure on Wednesday, February 26, was due to the construction of a Taliban checkpoint and facilities near the border. The Pakistani border forces took this action in response to the security concerns posed by these developments on the Afghanistan side.

Pakistani media have reported that the closure of the Torkham crossing is resulting in daily losses of approximately $3 million for traders on both sides. The ongoing shutdown is having a detrimental effect on trade and travel, exacerbating the economic difficulties for people in the region.

So far, the Taliban has not taken any action to resolve the issue or reopen the crossing. Despite the growing concerns, the group has remained silent on the matter, leaving the situation unresolved for now.

Pakistan has not yet officially commented on the closure or provided a statement on how long it expects the situation to last. The tension remains high as the blockage continues, impacting both the local economy and daily life.

The Torkham border has been closed before due to border tensions. In August 2024, the crossing was shut down after clashes between Pakistani forces and the Taliban over road construction near the border. Similar closures have occurred at other crossings like Ghulam Khan and Kharlachi following military confrontations.

Despite ongoing talks between Taliban officials in Nangarhar and Pakistani authorities, no resolution has been reached. Pakistan has requested the Taliban halt construction near the border, but the Taliban have refused. As the closure continues, hundreds of trucks with essential goods are stranded, raising concerns about price hikes and shortages in Afghanistan.

A former Afghan intelligence officer, who had worked with U.S. forces for 13 years, was arrested due to the new immigration policies under the Trump administration. Upon visiting the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office for his annual check-in, he was informed that his temporary residency permit had been revoked.

The officer’s situation is a direct result of the immigration policy changes implemented after Trump’s return to the White House in January 2025. These new regulations have significantly impacted the cases of Afghan refugees and asylum seekers.

As part of the policy shift, Trump issued an executive order suspending the resettlement program for Afghan refugees, including halting all flights for eligible Afghans seeking resettlement in the United States. Furthermore, reports indicate that the Trump administration closed the U.S. State Department office responsible for resettling refugees who had worked with U.S. forces.

The Trump administration’s refugee and resettlement policies have created considerable uncertainty for those who worked alongside U.S. forces, including Afghan nationals who assisted with intelligence and military operations. These individuals, who had been promised protection, now face the risk of deportation or detention under the new regulations.

The suspension of the refugee resettlement program has left many individuals stranded, unsure of their future and safety. With limited avenues for legal recourse, they find themselves in precarious situations as they navigate the shifting policies.

The actions of the Trump administration have sparked widespread criticism, especially from advocates for refugees and human rights organizations. Many argue that these policies betray the promises made to those who risked their lives working with U.S. forces and jeopardize their safety and well-being.

German media reported that a group of 155 Afghan local staff members who worked for the German government were transferred from Islamabad to Berlin on Tuesday. According to Bild newspaper, another group of Afghan refugees is expected to be transferred from Islamabad to Germany next month.

Some of those transferred to Berlin had worked for the German government before the German forces left Afghanistan in 2021. These individuals were part of the local staff employed by the German government in Afghanistan.

The Bild newspaper also noted that the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Christian Social Union (CSU) have criticized these flights. German politician Thorsten Frei warned that the federal government is bringing in people from Afghanistan instead of focusing on deporting Afghan criminals.

Reports indicate that Germany has accepted over 48,000 Afghans since the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban. Of these, 38,000 are individuals identified as “at risk” by the German government.

The AfD’s rise has sparked concerns among migrants about potential changes in immigration policies. The transfer of Afghan refugees to Germany continues, reflecting the country’s ongoing commitment to those at risk in Afghanistan.

However, with the AfD’s increased influence, the issue of immigration and refugee policies is becoming more contentious. Election outcomes could shape future policies, balancing humanitarian efforts with concerns over security and immigration control, potentially impacting Germany’s domestic and international stance on refugees.

Around 3,000 Afghans with German admission permits are currently waiting in Islamabad for their transfer to Berlin. This ongoing refugee process continues to be a significant issue in Germany’s foreign policy and immigration strategy. The government’s approach has sparked debate over the consistency of its policies regarding Afghan refugees.

John Sopko, the former Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), stated at the Herat Security Conference in Madrid on Tuesday that the United States has spent over $21 billion on Afghanistan since the Taliban’s return to power. He highlighted that, despite a reduction in foreign aid, the U.S. continues to send money to Afghanistan on a weekly basis.

Despite the U.S. government’s stance on cutting aid, Sopko argued that if the Taliban does not change its policies on women’s rights, education, and human rights, the U.S. believes that these funds should be halted. He also proposed that $4 billion from Afghanistan’s Swiss escrow fund should be used as compensation for victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

He added, “The humanitarian aid provided to Afghanistan has had no real impact on the Taliban’s views on women, children, education, and human rights.”

SIGAR’s report further breaks down that from the $20.7 billion allocated between August 2021 and June 2024, $2.97 billion went towards humanitarian and development assistance. These funds were spent across various sectors, including humanitarian aid, development projects, organizational operations, and security.

Sopko’s remarks reflect the ongoing challenges in Afghanistan, highlighting issues with U.S. financial aid and the lack of transparency in its use. His comments underscore a growing sense of frustration within the U.S. about its involvement in Afghanistan and the lack of tangible outcomes from its extensive investments. Moving forward, as U.S. priorities shift under a new administration, the future of American aid to Afghanistan remains uncertain.