Deputy UNSG: My Commitment to Defending Afghan Women’s Rights ‘Unwavering’

She stressed that women’s rights in Afghanistan must be ensured based on Islamic laws.

The Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations Amina J. Mohammed said that the rights of women and girls in Afghanistan continue to face repeated attacks.

The Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations said: “Women’s and girls’ rights in Afghanistan continue to be under constant attack. This year the rollbacks have gone further depriving them of a life of dignity. We will not give up. My commitment is unwavering to defend their rights in Islam.”

“Afghan women need practical measures from the United Nations. Merely statements and meetings held by the UN without any tangible results will not remove the restrictions on Afghan women,” said Alamtab Rasouli, a women’s rights activist.

At the same time, some students, with the beginning of 2025, are calling on the Islamic Emirate to provide the opportunity for girls to return to classrooms.

“We ask the Islamic Emirate to open schools for us so that we can continue our studies. I want to become a doctor in the future,” said Iqra, a student.

“If only males are educated, only fifty percent of Afghanistan will be literate. But if both genders study together, we can have a literate Afghanistan,” said Fatima, a schoolteacher.

Human rights remain one of the issues that the international community has consistently expressed concern about in Afghanistan.

Although the Islamic Emirate has not yet announced a timeline for reopening schools and universities for girls, it has repeatedly emphasized that all Afghan women’s rights are ensured within the framework of Islamic rulings in the country.

Deputy UNSG: My Commitment to Defending Afghan Women’s Rights ‘Unwavering’
read more

Blinken: US Foreign Policy Toward Afghanistan Will Not Change

Antony Blinken, the US Secretary of State, said that the future administration of Donald Trump will not change US foreign policy toward Afghanistan.

The US Secretary of State said: “I’m not at all sure that the election turned on any one or even collection of foreign policy issues, most elections don’t. But leaving that aside, Americans don’t want us in conflicts. They don’t want us at war, we went through 20 years where we had hundreds of thousands of Americans deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. People were tired of that, understandably.”

Antony Blinken said ending the US war in Afghanistan was beneficial for the country, adding that the withdrawal from Afghanistan has strengthened the US’s global standing.

He said: “The fact that we will not have another generation of Americans fighting and dying in Afghanistan, I think that’s an important achievement in and of itself. It’s also actually strengthened our position around the world, and I see that every single day. Our adversaries would have liked nothing more than for us to remain bogged down in Afghanistan.”

“It is likely that Trump will pursue an Afghanistan policy focused on economics, ensuring international peace and security, which will serve the interests of both the US and Afghanistan,” said Janat Faheem Chakari, a political analyst.

Yesterday, Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the deputy political minister of Foreign Affairs, urged the new US administration to reconsider its policies toward Afghanistan.

Stanikzai said: “Our request to Mr. Trump is that if he wants to have good relations with Afghanistan, this issue should be resolved. We hope he takes positive steps, and we will also work to establish relations, God willing.”

The Doha Agreement was signed in February 2020 between the Islamic Emirate and the Trump administration in Doha, the capital of Qatar.

It remains to be seen how the new US administration will approach Afghanistan.

Blinken: US Foreign Policy Toward Afghanistan Will Not Change
read more

Canada warns citizens against traveling to Afghanistan amid security concerns

The Canadian government has advised its citizens not to travel to Afghanistan due to the “dangerous security situation and instability.” It also noted that consular assistance in the country is highly limited.

On Friday, January 3, Canada issued a statement highlighting several reasons for the advisory, including “insecurity, terrorist attacks, armed conflicts, high crime rates, and widespread human rights violations.” Citizens were urged to avoid travel to Afghanistan under any circumstances.

According to the statement, “The Canadian Embassy in Afghanistan has suspended its operations. Our ability to provide consular assistance and other support in the country is highly restricted.”

The advisory also warned Canadian citizens currently in Afghanistan to stay in secure shelters. It stressed that they are “responsible for their own safety and that of their families.”

Canada further urged its citizens in Afghanistan to contact its Emergency Watch and Response Center for consular assistance if needed.

As of now, the Taliban officials have not responded to Canada’s advisory. Previous warnings from countries such as the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom also urged their citizens to avoid traveling to Afghanistan due to security risks.

The Canadian advisory reflects the ongoing concerns about Afghanistan’s security situation, highlighting the risks posed by terrorism, crime, and human rights violations. These warnings emphasize the challenges faced by the international community in engaging with Afghanistan under its current administration.

Despite assurances from the Taliban regime, such advisories underline the need for sustained efforts to restore security and build trust in the region. Addressing these issues will be critical for Afghanistan’s integration into the global community.

Canada warns citizens against traveling to Afghanistan amid security concerns
read more

Islamic Emirate Assures Safety of Foreign Nationals

The Islamic Emirate dismissed concerns over Afghanistan’s security situation as baseless and assured the safety of foreign nationals in the country.

The Canadian government in a statement advised its citizens to avoid traveling to Afghanistan “for security reasons.”

In this statement, Canada cited “the unfavorable security situation, armed conflicts, and the potential for kidnapping and detentions in Afghanistan” as reasons for its warning.

Addressing Canadians, the statement said: “Avoid all travel to Afghanistan due to the volatile security situation, terrorist attacks, ongoing armed conflict, the risk of kidnapping, arbitrary arrest and detention, the high crime rate, and widespread violations of human rights by the de facto authorities.”

Fazl Rahman Oria, a political analyst, told TOLOnews: “There is no trust between Afghanistan and foreign countries, especially Canada. This position of Canada stems from this lack of trust.”

However, the Islamic Emirate dismissed concerns over Afghanistan’s security situation as baseless and assured the safety of foreign nationals in the country.

Hamdullah Fitrat, Deputy Spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, stated: “There is no reason for concern regarding security in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is now safe, and a large number of foreign nationals, diplomats, and tourists are present in the country.”

Previously, several other countries, including the United States, Germany, Russia, and the United Kingdom, have also deemed travel to Afghanistan highly risky.

Islamic Emirate Assures Safety of Foreign Nationals
read more

Stanikzai to Trump: Islamic Emirate Ready for Engagement with US

In another part of his speech, Stanikzai criticized what he referred to as anti-government propaganda by some countries.

Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, stated today (Saturday) during a graduation ceremony at a madrasa that the Islamic Emirate has closed the door on enmity with the United States and is ready to engage with all countries, including the U.S.

The deputy minister said that the interim government hopes the new US administration will reconsider its policies toward Afghanistan and refrain from interfering in Afghanistan’s internal affairs. Stanikzai also emphasized the need for the United States to honor the Doha Agreement.

He stated: “One or two weeks from now, he [Trump] will come to power. He should change his policy, abandon Biden’s policy, and create a new approach. From Afghanistan and the Islamic Emirate’s side, the path is open for them. If they intend friendship, we will extend a hand of friendship as well. An enemy does not remain an enemy forever, and a friend does not remain a friend forever.”

In another part of his speech, Stanikzai criticized what he referred to as anti-government propaganda by some countries. According to him, the intelligence agencies of regional and global powers are fully engaged in an intelligence and media war against the Islamic Emirate.

He further stated: “If Daesh carries out an incident in Kabul, the world immediately claims that there is no security in Afghanistan and that this place is a hub of terrorism, urging countries to gather and form a consensus. But in the US, there were two attacks on Trump, and no one claimed that security was lacking there. The purpose of all this is that the world has launched an intelligence and media war against us.”

On the other hand, Abdul Latif Mansoor, the acting minister of energy and water, who also spoke at the event, emphasized the importance of good behavior toward citizens. He stated: “First, I address myself, and then I address the scholars and officials of the Islamic Emirate: we must not become arrogant due to our power and capabilities, and we must not betray our people.”

The program organizers announced that 430 religious scholars from various sections of the Abdullah Ibn Mubarak Madrasa graduated today (Saturday) and received their certificates.

Stanikzai to Trump: Islamic Emirate Ready for Engagement with US
read more

30 Rare Birds Rescued in Bamyan

In recent years, the market for buying and selling these birds has grown in Bamyan, with hunters selling a single Saira bird for up to 10,000 afghani.

The Bamyan Directorate of Environmental Protection states that 30 rare birds, whose hunting is prohibited, have been rescued from hunters and returned to their natural habitat.

According to this directorate, the hunting of these birds, known as Saira, is strictly prohibited by the National Environmental Protection Agency. The continuation of hunting and trafficking of these birds could lead to their complete extinction.

In recent years, the market for buying and selling these birds has grown in Bamyan, with hunters selling a single Saira bird for up to 10,000 afghani.

Mohammad Ibrahim Dadfar, head of the Bamyan Directorate of Environmental Protection, said: “Today, we rescued 30 Afghan Saira birds from sellers. This species is endangered, which is why we collected them from the market and released them back into nature.”

Environmental experts emphasize that Bamyan, with its high mountains and suitable climate, is a unique habitat for wildlife. They stress the need to prevent hunting and wildlife trafficking, as this could contribute to the development of the tourism industry.

Abbas, an environmental expert, said: “If these birds are not hunted or trafficked, their population can be preserved, and Bamyan’s nature can flourish. This flourishing can attract many tourists.”

Mohammad Amin, a resident of Bamyan, said: “These birds and other wildlife species, like native and mountainous plants, play an important role in nature and hold special significance.”

Officials from the Bamyan Directorate of Environmental Protection also announced that nearly 200 loudspeakers, which caused noise pollution and disturbed city residents, have been removed.

30 Rare Birds Rescued in Bamyan
read more

WFP: Funding shortage limits aid to half of Afghanistan’s hungry this winter

The World Food Program (WFP) has announced that due to a lack of funding, it can only provide aid to 7 million out of the 14 million hungry people in Afghanistan.

Pauline Eloff, the head of the emergency department at the WFP, wrote on X/Twitter on Thursday, January 2, that for every two families in need of food assistance, the organization can only help one.

The organization added that many families in remote areas of Afghanistan will need food assistance to survive the cold season.

The WFP clarified that to support those in need in these remote regions, it has already sent essential food supplies to some villages months in advance.

According to the WFP, it will be impossible for some families in these areas to survive the winter without the food aid provided by the organization.

The WFP has urged both countries and partner organizations to assist in supporting the people in need in Afghanistan during the cold season.

Earlier, on December 18, the WFP reported that nearly 15 million people in Afghanistan did not know where their next meal would come from. At that time, the organization emphasized that it needed $718 million for its ongoing efforts in Afghanistan for the next six months.

Additionally, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) had previously stated that at least 23 million people in Afghanistan are in need of humanitarian assistance.

As Afghanistan faces deepening food insecurity, the international community’s support is becoming more crucial. The WFP’s call for financial help underscores the dire need for global collaboration to prevent further human suffering in the country. Without additional aid, the humanitarian situation could worsen, with the ongoing winter exacerbating the challenges faced by millions.

WFP: Funding shortage limits aid to half of Afghanistan’s hungry this winter
read more

Islamic Emirate, Pakistani Forces Clash in Khost

Initially, Pakistani forces targeted the Alisher district of Khost with rocket attacks, and then the forces of the Islamic Emirate responded to these attacks.

Military clashes between the forces of the Islamic Emirate and Pakistan in Khost province ended this morning (Friday, January 3) after several hours.

According to local residents, the clashes began at 1:30 AM last night and continued until 5:00 AM.

Initially, Pakistani forces targeted the Alisher district of Khost with rocket attacks, and then the forces of the Islamic Emirate responded to these attacks.

The Islamic Emirate has announced that the clashes caused no casualties.

Some residents of Khost province have also criticized Pakistan’s attack on the Ali Sher district.

“Last night, at 1:30 AM, Pakistan launched rocket attacks, which Afghan forces defended against, and the clashes continued until 5:00 AM,” said Hakeemullah, a resident of Khost.

“As a result of these clashes, people face numerous problems. Poor and impoverished individuals cannot afford transportation to the villages,” said Dawlat Khan, another resident of Khost.

Verbal tensions and military clashes between Afghanistan and Pakistan are not new and have also occurred in the past.

The issue of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has often overshadowed relations between the two sides.

Meanwhile, political and military analysts believe Pakistan should resolve its issues with Afghanistan through diplomacy rather than confrontation.

“Pakistan is a close neighbor of Afghanistan, and it is necessary for this country to understand Afghanistan’s current situation. Issues should be resolved through political, economic, and transit avenues via diplomatic channels,” said Hadi Quraishi, a military analyst.

“These acts of violence and attacks yield no good results and bring nothing but hatred between the two nations,” said Aziz Maarej, a former diplomat.

It is worth mentioning that on December 25, 2024, Pakistan carried out airstrikes on parts of the Barmal district in Paktika province, which resulted in the deaths of over fifty local residents, including women and children.

Islamic Emirate, Pakistani Forces Clash in Khost
read more

Islamic Emirate Reacts to ICG’s Report on Afghanistan

The Ministry of Economy said that the sanctions imposed by the world over the past three years have been unfair and should be lifted as soon as possible.

The International Crisis Group (ICG) stated that some countries refrained from negotiating with the Islamic Emirate in a way to promote women’s rights and other international norms, apparently to see if the interim government leaders independently take such actions.

In its report, the group noted that after the Islamic Emirate’s takeover in Afghanistan, the country was subjected to sanctions and economic and diplomatic restrictions, exacerbating poverty in Afghanistan.

Part of the International Crisis Group’s report reads: “Most countries declined to negotiate with the Taliban in a way that might have promoted women’s rights and other international norms, choosing instead to wait and see whether Afghanistan’s new leaders would do so on their own.”

“Neglect by neighboring, regional, and trans-regional countries occurred. Instead of engaging in understanding with the Islamic Emirate and resolving issues through dialogue, they acted contrary to that. According to the Crisis Group, Afghanistan was left alone, and in fact, the people of Afghanistan were abandoned in these conditions,” said Mohammad Yasin Habib, a political analyst.

In response to this report, the Islamic Emirate stated that the country’s internal matters are based on domestic values, cultures, and priorities, and other countries should not interfere in internal affairs or use them as a tool for recognition.

Zabihullah Mujahid, the spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, said: “The internal issues of the country belong to the nation, and they must find solutions within the country themselves. External countries should not interfere so deeply in a country’s internal matters that they impose conditions.”

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Economy said that the sanctions imposed by the world over the past three years have been unfair and should be lifted as soon as possible.

Abdul Latif Nazari, Deputy Minister of Economy, stated: “We ask countries not to interfere in the internal affairs of the country. Instead of interference, they should focus on cooperation in various fields, including economic issues, and we welcome the economic cooperation of countries.”

Earlier, the International Crisis Group had also reported that some regional countries, ignoring the protection of human rights in Afghanistan, were engaging with the interim government to achieve their interests.

Islamic Emirate Reacts to ICG’s Report on Afghanistan
read more

Tensions Escalate After Pakistan Pounds Afghanistan With Airstrikes

Reporting from Karachi, Pakistan

The New York Times

Pakistani leaders were once friends of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Now, cross-border violence has become alarmingly frequent.

Airstrikes by Pakistani warplanes inside Afghanistan have intensified tensions in recent days in an already volatile region. Once-close ties between Pakistan’s leaders and the Afghan Taliban have frayed, and violent cross-border exchanges have become alarmingly frequent.

Officially, the Pakistani government has been tight-lipped about the strikes in Afghanistan on Dec. 24. But security officials privately said that the Pakistani military had targeted hide-outs of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, a militant group also known as the T.T.P. or the Pakistani Taliban that has carried out a series of terrorist attacks inside Pakistan.

The security officials said that several top militants from the Pakistani Taliban had died in the airstrikes, which came days after 16 Pakistani military personnel were ambushed and killed in a border district.

The Taliban regime in Afghanistan said that dozens of civilians had died in the strikes, including Pakistani refugee families. The group condemned the strikes as a blatant violation of Afghan sovereignty, and said it had retaliated by conducting attacks on “several points” inside Pakistan.

The airstrikes were the Pakistani military’s third major operation on Afghan soil since the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, and the second in the past year alone.

Pakistani officials accuse the Taliban of providing sanctuary to the T.T.P., a charge that Taliban leaders deny. Pakistani officials defend the incursions into Afghanistan as essential to curbing T.T.P. attacks on Pakistani citizens and soldiers, as well as on Chinese nationals involved in projects under the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s infrastructure investment program.

“This is a red line for us: If the T.T.P. operates from there, it is not acceptable for us,” Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif of Pakistan said on Friday during a meeting with government ministers, referring to Afghanistan. “We will defend Pakistan’s sovereignty at every cost.”

The Pakistani and Afghan governments, facing deep challenges at home, have ample reason not to let the tensions spiral into broader conflict. But the surge in attacks by the Pakistani Taliban as they wage a bloody campaign against the Pakistani state has put immense pressure on leaders in both countries, said Syed Akhtar Ali Shah, a former senior police officer who served in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province bordering Afghanistan.

Pakistan’s government must show its people that it will respond to attacks, even as the country faces multiple crises that hinder its fight against terrorism, including weak governance and economic constraints.

After a Pakistani Taliban attack on a border post in September 2023, Pakistan launched a crackdown on undocumented Afghans, deporting over 800,000 people to Afghanistan. Pakistan also tightened trade restrictions on landlocked Afghanistan to pressure the Taliban.

For their part, the Taliban are caught between Pakistan’s demands to take action against the T.T.P. and strong domestic incentives not to do so.

By resisting the entreaties of a more powerful neighbor, the Taliban stoke nationalist sentiments among Afghans, helping the group project an image as Afghanistan’s legitimate rulers rather than as the insurgents they once were, Mr. Shah said.

The Taliban may also fear that a crackdown on the T.T.P. — with which they share jihadist beliefs and deeply rooted bonds — could divide the militant group’s ranks. That could push fighters toward the Islamic State affiliate in Afghanistan, known as ISIS-K, which poses a growing threat to the Taliban administration.

Pakistan’s frustrations with the Taliban represent a sharp turnabout. When the Taliban took control of Afghanistan three years ago, Pakistan initially considered it a strategic victory.

The U.S. withdrawal precipitated the fall of Ashraf Ghani’s administration in Kabul, which the Pakistani government had seen as supportive of India, Pakistan’s archrival.

In addition, Pakistan was optimistic that the new Taliban regime would rein in the T.T.P. Those hopes rested on the notion that the Taliban would reward Pakistan for the covert support it provided during the U.S.-led war.

But the Taliban’s rise instead revitalized the militant group, which has about 6,000 fighters. The Pakistani Taliban capitalized on newfound resources, including advanced U.S.-made weapons seized during the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, and the release of hundreds of fighters from Afghan prisons.

Emboldened, the group escalated its attacks inside Pakistan, targeting security and police forces in particular. The year that just ended was the deadliest in a decade for Pakistani civilians and security forces, with 1,612 fatalities in 444 terrorist attacks, according to the Center for Research and Security Studies, a research group in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital.

Experts said that Pakistan had made a strategic miscalculation with the Taliban.

“Expectation is not a strategy,” said Abdul Basit, a senior associate fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore. A clear, written agreement, Mr. Basit said, “should have been established with the Taliban regarding the T.T.P. from the outset.”

The two countries have taken some steps to try to improve relations. On the same day as the latest airstrikes, a newly appointed Pakistani special envoy, Mohammad Sadiq, was meeting in Kabul with top Taliban officials, including Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani and Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi.

The Taliban have also been addressing Pakistan’s concerns by resettling some T.T.P. militants in central Afghanistan, distancing them from the border region.

In Pakistan, antipathy toward the Pakistani Taliban has run especially deep since 2014, when the group killed more than 145 people, mostly children, in an attack on a military-run school in northwestern Pakistan.

military crackdown that Pakistan intensified after the school attack drove many Pakistani Taliban leaders and members, along with ordinary displaced families, into Paktika Province in eastern Afghanistan. That province is where the Pakistani military focused its airstrikes last week.

Pakistan has been linked to several operations in Paktika and neighboring Afghan provinces in recent years in which key T.T.P. militants were killed. Among them was Omar Khalid Khorasani, a top commander, who died in a roadside bombing in 2022.

The Pakistani Taliban attacks have provided fuel in the political infighting that has racked Pakistan in recent years.

The Pakistani military has sharply criticized a key decision during the tenure of Imran Khan, the former prime minister who was ousted in April 2022 after falling out with the military and now is in prison.

In 2021, Pakistani officials engaged in peace talks with the T.T.P. that were facilitated by the Taliban after their return to power. The yearlong negotiations, which included a brief cease-fire, ultimately failed.

Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, a military spokesman, condemned the initiative as a “misguided approach” that allowed Pakistani Taliban fighters to resettle and regroup in Pakistan. “Our soldiers are now paying the price of that wrong decision with their blood,” General Chaudhry told reporters on Friday.

Mr. Khan’s party, however, argues that the talks were initiated by the military chief at the time, Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, not the civilian government.

As the fight against the Pakistani Taliban becomes fodder for political squabbling, residents in conflict-ridden border areas in Pakistan express frustration about the escalating insecurity.

“These airstrikes and border skirmishes distract from the real issue — the failure of both Pakistan and the Taliban to provide basic security and relief,” said Azam Mehsud, a 31-year-old student from South Waziristan, a border district.

“Instead of addressing the root causes of violence, both sides are covering up their failures, leaving civilians to suffer,” Mr. Mehsud added.

Tensions Escalate After Pakistan Pounds Afghanistan With Airstrikes
read more