Jennifer Lawrence brings documentary about Afghan women to Cannes

Tom Ambrose

The Guardian

Sun 21 May 2023 18.57 EDT

Bread and Roses, co-produced by Lawrence, documents lives of three women after Taliban’s return to power

A documentary about the lives of three women living under the Taliban, co-produced by Jennifer Lawrence, has premiered at the Cannes film festival.

Bread and Roses, shown at a special screening on Sunday, follows three Afghan women in the weeks after the Taliban’s return to power in 2021 after the withdrawal of US troops.

The documentary was made by Excellent Cadaver, a production company set up by Lawrence and her producer friend Justine Ciarrocchi.

“Jen’s first response was to find an Afghan film-maker and give them a platform,” Ciarrocchi told the Hollywood Reporter.

Directed by Sahra Mani, whose 2018 documentary A Thousand Girls Like Me looked at a sexually abused woman’s quest for justice, the film aimed to show how the lives of women changed overnight under Taliban rule.

“This film has a message from women in Afghanistan, a soft message: please be their voice who are voiceless under Taliban dictatorship,” said Mani at the premiere.

She added: “Now that women can no longer leave the house without the veil, I thought we should tell their stories.”

While the featured women did not know each other, they are all are from different groups who protested against the Taliban coup.

In an interview on the Cannes website, Mani – now living in France – said filming the documentary was difficult and the safety of those involved was a top priority.

“The way in which their lives have changed under the Taliban is an everyday reality for us,” she added. “It’s life under a dictatorship, a cruel reality we cannot ignore.”

 

Jennifer Lawrence brings documentary about Afghan women to Cannes
read more

The U.S. Left Them Behind. They Crossed a Jungle to Get Here Anyway.

The New York Times

May 21, 2023

Our journalists trekked with Afghan migrants as they traveled from South America to the United States.

Taiba was being hunted by the men she had put behind bars.

The death threats came as the Americans withdrew from Afghanistan and the Taliban marched across her country, she said. In the chaos, cell doors were flung open, freeing the rapists and abusers she had helped send to prison.

“We will find you,” the callers growled. “We will kill you.”

Taiba’s entire life had been shaped by the American vision of a democratic Afghanistan: She had studied law, worked with the Americans to fight violence against women and ultimately became a top government official for women’s rights, gathering testimony that put abusers away.

But after saving so many women’s lives, she was suddenly trying to save her own.

She and her husband, Ali, pleaded for help from a half-dozen nations — many of which they’d worked with — and found an American refugee program they might be eligible for. Taiba said she sent off her information, but never heard back.

“They left us behind,” she said of the Americans. “Sometimes I think maybe God left all Afghans behind.”

For months, Taiba kept trying to make it to America any way she could — even by foot. She and her husband fled with their 2-year-old son, first to Pakistan, then to South America, joining the vast human tide of desperation pressing north toward the United States.

Like thousands of Afghans who have taken this same, unfathomable route to escape the Taliban and their country’s economic collapse in the last 17 months, they trudged through the jungle, slept on the forest floor amid fire ants and snakes, hid their money in their food to fool thieves and crossed the sliver of land connecting North and South America — the treacherous Darién Gap.

Now, after more than 16,000 miles, Taiba and her family had finally reached it: the American border.

In the darkness, Taiba crawled into a drainage tunnel under a highway. When she emerged, she saw two enormous steel fences, the last barriers between her old life and what she hoped would be a new one. A smuggler flung a ladder over the first wall.

Taiba gripped the rungs and began to climb into the country that had helped define her. She knew the Americans were turning away asylum seekers. A single thought consumed her.

Once she got in, would they let her stay?

Frantic parents breached airport gates with suitcases and children in hand. Panicked crowds climbed jet wings and clung to the sides of departing American planes. A few tried to hang on, lost their grip and fell from the skies.

It was August 2021, and the Taliban had swept into Kabul just as American troops pulled out, ending a 20-year occupation that left Afghanistan in the hands of the very militants Washington had ousted.

The images seemed a tragic coda to America’s longest war. But for countless Afghans, the frenetic days of the U.S. withdrawal were only the beginning of a long, harrowing search for safety.

The new Taliban administration turned back decades of civil liberties, particularly for women. Afghans who had supported the West were terrified of being persecuted, and a careening economy pushed millions near starvation. Many Afghans fled to Pakistan, Iran and Turkey, often finding only short-term visas or worse — beatings, detention and deportation.

Thousands tried for Europe, climbing into cargo trucks or taking flimsy boats across the Mediterranean Sea. At least 1,250 Afghan migrants have died trying to find refuge since the American withdrawal, the United Nations says.

Many others set their sights even farther: the United States.

More than 3,600 Afghans have traveled the same agonizing route as Taiba since the beginning of 2022, according to tallies in Panama, one of the most perilous sections of the journey. Many of them had partnered with the West for years — lawyers, human rights advocates, members of the Afghan government or security forces. They packed up their children, parents or entire families, sold their apartments and borrowed enormous sums to pay for the passage, convinced there was nothing left for them back home.

Their journeys represent the collision of two of President Biden’s biggest policy crises: the hasty American withdrawal from Afghanistan and the record number of migrants crossing the U.S. border.

Now, the fallout from a faraway war that many Americans thought was over is landing at the president’s doorstep: Afghan men, women and children climbing over border walls under the cover of night, desperate to join a nation that, they feel, left them behind.

The withdrawal from Afghanistan is not just a failure “in the rearview mirror,” said Francis Hoang, a former U.S. Army captain who runs an organization to help Afghans immigrate, called Allied Airlift 21.

The failure is happening right now,” he said.

The Afghans wend through about a dozen countries, for months or longer. Nearly all are robbed or extorted; some are kidnapped or jailed. Others are fought over by rival smugglers or sent back to countries they already passed through. Parents and children are torn apart by the authorities. Babies have been born along the way.

The Times traveled with a group of 54 Afghans through one of the hardest parts of the journey, the notorious Darién Gap, and interviewed nearly 100 people making the trek. Many spoke English, had entwined their lives with the Western mission in Afghanistan and hoped that, as American allies, they would be received with open arms.

One Escape Route

Most migrants from Afghanistan set out for the U.S. border after flying to Brazil. This is one of the many routes Afghans have taken on their trek, winding through about a dozen countries, with the trip lasting for months or longer.

Niazi, 41, traveled with his wife and three sons, all wearing New York baseball caps. He described working in the Afghan president’s protective service, and showed off pictures of himself guarding Laura Bush, the American first lady, and President Barack Obama.

He then played a surveillance video of people he identified as members of the Taliban, beating his brothers as they searched for him. He had applied for a special U.S. visa, he said, but because he had worked for the Afghan government, not directly for the Americans, he wasn’t eligible.

Ali and Nazanin, a pair of doctors in their 20s who had recently married, were risking the journey, too. Like Taiba and her family, they are Hazara, an ethnic minority massacred by the Taliban during their first regime in the 1990s, and believed they could never be safe under the new government.

“I am thinking about my future child,” said Ali.

Two grandfathers, one who said he had worked for the toppled Afghan government, traveled with their families, 17 people in all. Mohammad Sharif, who said he was a former Afghan police officer, and his wife, Rahima, came too, carrying their infant son, born two months before in Brazil.

Nearly all of them asked to be identified only by their first names, to protect relatives back in Afghanistan.

Mozhgan, 20, was the most talkative. She had been in the 11th grade when the Taliban entered Kabul and she could no longer go to school.

The American presence had opened the world for her. She spoke multiple languages, including English, Hindi and bits of Chinese. She watched Marvel movies and listened to BTS, the Korean pop group whose music had turned her from what she called a “shy, sad, corner girl” into a confident, inquisitive woman.

She dreamed of being a fashion designer or a reporter, like the women in American movies. Her sister, Samira, 16, thought about being an astronaut. Under the Taliban, which have barred women from most public spaces, those lives were now impossible.

“Like being on a road with no destination,” Mozhgan called it.

Their family, also Hazara, considered legal paths to the United States, Mozhgan said, but determined they would “take years.”

Then a bomb went off at their brother’s school in Kabul, most likely an attack by Islamic State militants challenging the Taliban, and her father decided to flee.

Thousands of despairing migrants have made the daunting jungle crossing from South America to the United States for years.

But before the Americans left Afghanistan and the Taliban took over, Afghans were hardly ever among them. Officials in Panama say that only about 100 Afghans in total crossed the jungle from 2010 to 2019.

Now, hundreds of Afghans are risking it every month, officials say, part of a historic crush of people pouring through the Darién, the only way from South America to the United States by land.

The Darién is a roadless, mountainous tangle, considered a last resort for decades, with notorious hardships: rivers that sweep away bodies, hills that cause heart attacks, mud that nearly swallows children, bandits who rob, kidnap, assault and kill.

But with the economic and political havoc of recent years, including the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, interest in the Darién has exploded — along with relentless advertising on TikTok, Facebook and WhatsApp by smugglers and migrants alike, sometimes presenting the route like a family outing that almost anyone can manage.

“Safe. 100 percent trustworthy. Special packages with transport, lodging and food,” reads one Facebook post showing people holding hands as they stroll toward a fluttering American flag. “Guaranteed.”

Fewer than 11,000 people crossed the jungle each year, on average, from 2010 to 2020. But this year, officials say, as many as 400,000 are expected to make the journey, nearly all of them headed to the United States.

And while most are from Venezuela, Haiti and Ecuador, the route has increasingly become a United Nations of migration, with a growing number from China, India, Nigeria, Somalia and elsewhere.

Mr. Biden is trying hard to shut it down. In April, he and his allies in the region announced a 60-day campaign intended to end the illicit movement of people through the Darién. His administration has also imposed new rules that are expected to make it harder for all asylum seekers, including Afghans, to enter the United States.

Many of the Afghans on the journey knew Mr. Biden was clamping down on immigration, but said they were coming anyway — no matter the hardship.

“If 10 times I am sent back,” said Ali, the doctor, “10 times I will return.”

A village formed in Terminal B of São Paulo-Guarulhos airport: Afghans sleeping under wool blankets strung like tents across luggage carts.

It was December 2022, and most of them had arrived in Brazil days before, even weeks, carrying the last of their belongings and only a vague idea of what to do next.

They could stay in Brazil, even work. But few spoke Portuguese, and the nation’s minimum wage was only about $250 a month. Most had large families — five, 10 or 20 people — to support back home. Many had borrowed their relatives’ last savings to make it this far, and if they didn’t pay it back, their families would go hungry.

“The only hope in the family is me,” said Haroon, 27, an engineer who had recently arrived in Brazil.

So, many of the Afghans soon took off, their minds fixed on the United States.

They crossed Peru, Ecuador and Colombia, passed liked batons from smuggler to smuggler.

On a starless night in March, Taiba and her husband, Ali, waded toward a boat in Colombia with 50 other Afghans, headed for the Darién Gap. A haze blurred a full moon.

Their road map was nothing more than a terse, three-page PDF circulating around the world, sometimes on WhatsApp chains. Written in Persian, it offered advice on getting from Brazil all the way through Mexico, listing a few smuggler contacts and pithy travel tips.

In Colombia, “always remember to keep 10 dollars in your passport,” to pay off police officers who threaten arrest. In the jungle, “the first day is stressful.” In Mexico, “make sure to hide all your documents and money.”

Taiba and Ali’s son, a round-cheeked toddler who had just turned 3, was getting heavy, so they often strapped him to the back of a cousin, Jalil, 24, a kickboxing coach and an ideal bodyguard for the journey ahead.

Most of the Afghans had heard about the dangers of the Darién, and their smuggler offered them the so-called V.I.P. route — $420 a person, versus the more common $300 — that cut the trip to about four days, from as many as eight or nine.

As Taiba climbed into the boat, packing in with dozens of others like cargo, she tried to make sense of how much her life had changed in the last two years.

She and Ali had met as university students. He later worked as a translator for Spanish troops, he said, before taking a job with a United Nations contractor. Until the Taliban took over, they were happy — and in love with the Afghanistan they were helping to build. Then, as fighters swept into Kabul, Taiba raced to her office to burn documents, hoping to protect herself and other women, she said, before fleeing to another city.

For months, they pleaded with governments for help, until Uruguay agreed to take them in. But in Montevideo, the capital, they quickly decided that they couldn’t earn enough to support their families back home. Taiba argued for heading north.

Now, she was having regrets.

A boat captain barked at them to turn off their phones, so they could travel undetected by the police. The motor roared, and the 54 Afghans sped up the coast, crying, vomiting and praying. Many had never seen an ocean or sea.

“Are we going to drown?” Mozhgan wondered out loud. “Or are we going to survive?”

The next day, they entered the forest and trudged up three mountains, the last of which is known locally as La Llorona, the crying woman. They fell often, lanced their hands on spiked trees, dragged boots filled with mud and at times collapsed from exhaustion. The former policeman’s son cried constantly.

Mohammad Rahim, 60, one of the two grandfathers in the family of 17, fared the worst, stopping many times each hour to lay in the dirt. His children knelt beside him, massaging his body back to life. Murmuring prayers, the other Afghans wondered if he would make it.

Near the top of La Llorona, Ahmad, 24, an engineer, began to break down.

“I am crazy to come here!” he yelled, banging his machete into the tree roots knotting the ground.

“No one cares about us!” he yelled. “We have important people left in Afghanistan and no one cares!”

In the final days of the American occupation in 2021, the Biden administration airlifted roughly 88,500 Afghans out of the country, an effort the American president called “extraordinary.”

“Only the United States had the capacity and the will and the ability to do it,” Mr. Biden told the American public afterward.

Fewer than 25,000 Afghans have received special visas or refugee status in the United States since the airlifts in 2021, government data shows. And the options are scarcer for people who didn’t work with the United States but might still be in danger.

Roughly 52,000 Afghans have applied for a program called humanitarian parole. As of mid-April, just 760 people had been approved.

By comparison, more than 300,000 Ukrainians arrived in the United States under various programs in just over a year.

“I don’t understand why the world has had their arms so open to Ukrainians and so closed to Afghans,” said Shawn VanDiver, the U.S. Navy veteran who started #AfghanEvac.

A spokeswoman for the U.S. National Security Council, Adrienne Watson, said the administration was working to enhance an already robust resettlement program for Afghans. She called it “part of our long-term commitment to our Afghan allies.”

Many of the Afghans in the jungle said they didn’t feel that commitment.

“We did a lot of things for the American people,” said Niazi, the father who showed pictures of himself as a guard with President Obama. “But the American people just left us.”

A steep dirt hill signaled the Afghans’ last push through the wilderness. Finally, they had reached a camp constructed by an Indigenous group, the Emberá. Taiba stared slack-jawed at the generators, wooden platforms and women selling fried chicken and Coca-Cola.

In the morning, the Emberá led them to canoes and, for $25 a person, ferried them to a checkpoint in Panama, where officials counted them, took down their nationalities and sent them on their way north.

Mohammad Azim, 70, the other grandfather, rushed to the river to wash himself. Then, beneath a fence topped by barbed wire, he knelt to pray — thankful that he made it, apprehensive about the thousands of miles to go.

The group of 54 splintered soon after.

Taiba and her family took a bus through Costa Rica, walked for hours until they found a car through Nicaragua, and were forced to pay bribes to the police in Honduras. In Guatemala, they hiked through more forest, then paid another smuggler to get them from a bus to a boat, across a river and into a truck, all the way to southern Mexico.

Back in Uruguay, Taiba had shed her head scarf to blend in and cut her hair when it began to fall out. By now, she had lost 20 pounds and watched her child lose 15 percent of his body weight.

If the Americans didn’t take her, she thought, maybe she would just keep going — to Canada, where her husband had relatives and, she imagined, the government might be more welcoming.

Ali, the doctor who vowed to keep trying to make it to the United States even if he was “sent back” 10 times, proved prescient. Near the American border, he and his wife were stopped by the Mexican police, robbed and put on a bus across Mexico, back to the border with Guatemala.

They set out again from there, only to be apprehended for a second time and jailed for about a week.

News about other Afghans who tried to cross into the United States trickled in.

Milad, 29, a lawyer, climbed over the wall with his wife and children, ages 2 and 4. They were held in U.S. detention in Calexico, Calif., he said, and told they would be taken to a hotel. Instead, U.S. border officials put them in a white van with blacked out windows that dropped them on the street in Mexicali, Mexico, he said. His cousin Tamim, 27, a journalist, said he had a similar experience.

Ahmad Faheem Majeed, 28, a former Afghan Air Force intelligence officer who crossed into Texas in September 2022, was detained and charged with failing to enter at a designated checkpoint, a misdemeanor. He pleaded guilty and was held in U.S. custody for eight months, court records show.

“I helped these Americans,” he said from Eden Detention Center in Texas, sometimes near tears. “I am not understanding why they are not helping me.”

U.S. homeland security officials declined to discuss their cases.

Mozhgan’s family made it to Mexico City, but was scared to continue without immigration paperwork issued by the Mexican government, which they thought would shield them from arrest. They waited in line for days before heading north.

Taiba and her family boarded a bus from Mexico City to the U.S. border.

“The pleasure of travel,” the motto on the bus said. It had been a year since they left Afghanistan.

A weariness set in, her hope nearly buried by exhaustion. Criminals and the police stopped the bus repeatedly to extort money. On the third night, they reached Tijuana, border lights twinkling in the distance. It was early April.

The next evening, a smuggler brought them to the drainage tunnel in the middle of the city. As they climbed the first border fence, they could see wildflowers and a highway on the other side.

Taiba lowered herself to the ground with anticipation, her feet landing on dirt.

They had made it — or so they thought.

They spent a cold night in an immigration netherworld, of sorts, trapped between two border fences. In the morning, U.S. Border Patrol officers swept them up. After so many thousands of miles, they said, their welcome was a detention center.

They had hoped to claim asylum then and there. Instead, U.S. officials handed them documents clarifying that each was an “alien present in the United States,” subject to deportation.

They could fight removal at a court hearing, set for June 30, 2025, on the other side of the country, in Boston.

To apply for asylum, they would have to navigate the process on their own, or find a lawyer. Until then, they couldn’t work.

A charity briefly put them in a hotel room, but the questions began to gnaw: How would they eat? Where could they live? Was this the American dream?

“Everything is dark,” said Taiba’s husband, Ali.

The others faced similar challenges.

Milad, the lawyer, tried the crossing again and made it, landing a kitchen job under the table. Ali and Nazanin, the doctors, finally got to the border and across it, then made their way to her brother’s home in Georgia. Niazi, the presidential guard, wound up in a shelter in San Diego, wondering how to get his three boys into classes — they had lost two years of schooling.

None of the families had a lawyer or a clear idea of how to survive, much less feed their families back home in Afghanistan. Most began writing desperate messages to migrant aid organizations, but the groups were overwhelmed, and the Afghans rarely heard back.

Mozhgan’s family faced a different terror: She had gone missing.

She had scaled the first border fence, then spent three nights between the walls. Finally, immigration officials carted her family to detention — but she and an older brother, both over 18, were treated as single adults and kept in custody, while the rest of the family was released in California.

They had fled Afghanistan together and spent months trekking through unforgiving terrain, evading bandits and dodging corrupt police officers — only to be separated, without any contact, in the country where they hoped to find refuge.
Her mother, Anisa, was frantic, said Mozhgan’s father, Abdul. “We might not be able to see them again,” he recalled her saying.

Their children were released about a week later and reunited with the family.

Taiba kept moving. In early May, an aid group in New York offered a spot in a shelter and the family headed east, bound for more uncertainty. Without asylum, they faced a life in the shadows, like millions of other undocumented immigrants in the United States.

Her husband had always assumed the Darién would be the hardest part of the journey.

“But when I emerged from the jungle, we have seen, ‘No,’” he said. “The difficulties are forever.”

Federico Rios contributed reporting from Brazil, Mexico and the Darién Gap, and Ruhullah Khapalwak from Vancouver.

Julie Turkewitz is the Andes bureau chief, covering Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Suriname and Guyana. Before moving to South America, she was a national correspondent covering the American West.

A version of this article appears in print on May 21, 2023, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Stranded Afghans Risk Crossing a Jungle.
The U.S. Left Them Behind. They Crossed a Jungle to Get Here Anyway.
read more

Travel Ban Affecting Relations With World: Mujahid

 Mujahid said that the issue will cause mistrust between Afghanistan and the international community. 

The Islamic Emirate’s spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said that the existing travel bans on the leaders of the Islamic Emirate will affect the interim government’s relations with foreign countries.  

Mujahid said that the issue will cause mistrust between Afghanistan and the international community.

“We hope that the restrictions which are imposed on the officials of the Islamic Emirate will be removed soon. Doing so will increase the effectiveness of both the agencies and other countries as well as Afghanistan. I mentioned previously that restrictions do not bring any results, so they should not continue on failed paths with no results,” Mujahid said.

In August 2022, the UN Security Council failed to reach an agreement on whether to extend travel exemptions for 13 members of the Islamic Emirate.

“The lack of the extension of the travel ban exemption is because the interim government has not only failed to take steps to form an inclusive government and ensure human rights, but with the ban on female workers in the UN, it turned its back,” said Sayed Jawad Sijadi, a university instructor.

“We still see that whenever there is a need, the UN Security Council allows (Amir Khan) Muttaqi to travel to Islamabad,” said Bilal Fatimi, an international relations analyst.

Earlier, a UN Security Council committee agreed to allow the foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi to travel to Pakistan from Afghanistan, where he met the foreign ministers of Pakistan and China.

Travel Ban Affecting Relations With World: Mujahid
read more

Students Call for Reopening of Universities for Women

They said that many female students will pursue their education overseas if the ban continues.

A group of students on Saturday called for the reopening of universities for women as five months have passed since the ban on higher education for female students.

They said that many female students will pursue their education overseas if the ban continues.

Some female students said they have become depressed after the closure of universities.

“It has been five months since the universities have been closed for women. They are faced with depression. They have become hopeless. I, too, have lost my ambitions,” said Freshta, a student.

Other students meanwhile said that education is the undeniable right of women and girls and the Islamic Emirate should reopen universities as soon as possible.

“I ask the Islamic Emirate not to remove us from society,” said Susan, a student. “We have a hadith from the Messenger of Allah which says getting an education is our right.”

“We ask the Islamic Emirate to reopen schools, universities, and educational centers to us as soon as possible so that we can use our inalienable right to education and develop our careers,” said Waslat, another student.

Some university lecturers said that the presence of female students in universities is crucial for the improvement of society.

“There is a great need for education, for the reopening of schools, universities, and madrasas, especially at this time that we need to keep moving forward parallel with the world,” said Mustafa Murtazawi, a university lecturer.

Previously, the Islamic Emirate said that efforts are underway on a curriculum for universities.

Students Call for Reopening of Universities for Women
read more

Iran Gives Afghanistan One Month to Resolve Iran’s Water Rights Issue

The ambassador asked the current government of Afghanistan to take practical steps in this regard.

Following the rise of tension over Iran’s water rights from the Helmand River in recent days, Hassan Kazemi Qomi, Iran’s ambassador to Afghanistan, said the current Afghan government should clarify the issue of Iran’s water rights within a month.

In an interview with Iranian media, Qomi added that if the Islamic Emirate wants Afghanistan to move towards peace and stability, it should have constructive interaction with its neighbors.

“If there was water and the Taliban did not provide it to the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, then it is clear how it should act on this issue, which is one of the basic rights of the Iranian nation, and it should happen during this one month,” Qomi noted.

The ambassador asked the current government of Afghanistan to take practical steps in this regard.

“Taliban officials know that they must engage in constructive interaction with their neighbors if they want to have a strong, stable government in their country that includes all of the people’s representatives and the country moves towards peace, stability, independence, territorial integrity, and prosperity,” Qomi said.

In the meantime, Iran’s energy minister said in an interview with the country’s media that Iranian technical team is prepared to visit the Kajaki and Kamal Khan dams in accordance with international law and the 1973 treaty to assess the condition of water rights.

But the Islamic Emirate said that it is committed to ensuring Iran its water rights in accordance with the 1973 pact.

The Islamic Emirate’s spokesperson, Zabihullah Mujahid, noted that the majority of the country’s provinces are presently experiencing drought, and the water level in dams has dropped.

“Water is not at the level where it can reach Iran. Afghanistan is also suffering from a drought. Everywhere across the country, water levels have dropped. We can see that in Helmand, Badghis, Nimroz, and other provinces, people do not have water to drink,” Mujahid told TOLOnews.

“Kajaki dam in Helmand has not been filled with water due to drought and the Kamal Khan Dam is also empty,” said Mohammad Asim Mayar, a water expert.

While farmers and residents of Afghanistan’s Helmand province are experiencing water scarcity and droughts have harmed this area’s farming fields, Iran insists on receiving its water rights based on the 1973 treaty.

Iran Gives Afghanistan One Month to Resolve Iran’s Water Rights Issue
read more

G7 Leaders Criticize Violation of Women, Girls’ Rights in Afghanistan

The Islamic Emirate said that women’s rights have been respected in accordance with the Islamic Sharia and that an inclusive governance has also been formed.

The leaders of the Group of Seven (G7) in a statement criticized violations of human rights, particularly recent restrictions by the Islamic Emirate on women’s employment and access to education in Afghanistan.

The G7 leaders in their annual summit that was held in Hiroshima, Japan, on May 19, called for the cancellation of the ban on women and girls in Afghanistan and emphasized the need for full participation of the people in the government and the start of the national dialogue.

They also asked the current Afghan government to fulfil its commitments to the people of Afghanistan and the world and not to allow terrorist groups to use Afghanistan’s soil against other countries.

“We call on the Taliban to uphold its counterterrorism commitments and to ensure the territory of Afghanistan cannot be used to threaten or attack any country, to plan or finance terrorist acts, or to shelter and train terrorists,” the statement said.

“We express our strongest opposition to the Taliban’s systematic violations on human rights and fundamental freedoms, and call for the immediate reversal of unacceptable decisions, especially those against women and girls,” the statement added.

The G7 leaders also said that “all Afghans must enjoy full, equal, and meaningful participation in all spheres of public life, and have access to humanitarian assistance and basic services.”

“We call upon the Taliban to respect UNSCR 2681/2023 and the UN Charter, including Article 8, and to ensure unrestricted operations of the UN in Afghanistan. To remedy the persistent lack of political inclusivity and representation, we urge the Taliban to take significant steps to engage in credible, inclusive and Afghan-led national dialogue, in which all Afghans can be involved,” the statement said.

Meanwhile, on the sidelines of the Central Asia-China Summit, Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev emphasized the need to provide assistance for the purpose of preventing the spread of the humanitarian crisis and fighting against terrorism.

“We consider it essential to fully use the dialogue platforms of the Contact Group within the framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Afghanistan’s neighbor-states to develop a coordinated position and prevent a humanitarian catastrophe in that country. As you noted yesterday, Mr. Xi Jinping, it is important to jointly promote issues related to assisting to build an inclusive political system in Afghanistan, to establish full-scale counter-terrorism cooperation between our countries,” Tokayev said.

But the Islamic Emirate said that women’s rights have been respected in accordance with the Islamic Sharia and that an inclusive governance has also been formed.

The Islamic Emirate’s deputy spokesman, Bilal Karimi, praised regional countries for helping Afghanistan and highlighted that Afghanistan’s soil is not a threat to any country.

“Security is ensured. The entire geography and territory of the country is controlled by the Islamic Emirate and there is no group or movement in Afghanistan that threatens other countries from Afghanistan’s soil. There should be no worries in this regard,” Karimi noted.

“The informal interactions that the region and the world have with the current Afghan government should prioritize the rights of Afghan women so that in the future we will see the reopening of schools for girls,” Soraya Pikan, a women’s rights activist, told TOLOnews.

“These countries are really interested in China to assist them in their development, military affairs and weapons because they are anxious and concerned about Afghanistan,” said Asadullah Nadim a military affairs analyst.

This comes as Uzbekistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan Ismatilla Irgashev in a meeting last week with the special representative of UK for Afghanistan Andrew McCubrey discussed the issue of an Afghan settlement.

The British side highly appreciated the constructive role of Uzbekistan in finding solutions to resolve the situation in Afghanistan, as well as in ensuring peaceful development in the country, the Uzbek envoy said.

G7 Leaders Criticize Violation of Women, Girls’ Rights in Afghanistan
read more

GOP mulls how to make its Afghanistan oversight matter

House Republicans pushed their probe of the nation’s chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan to the brink this week, threatening to hold the secretary of state in contempt of Congress.

Yet some of them aren’t convinced that voters care.

For the House GOP the messy 2021 military removal that resulted in the death of 13 U.S. service members remains a potent political liability for President Joe Biden. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said that “oh yeah, 100 percent” the withdrawal has done lasting damage to Biden, whose approval ratings demonstrably sank in the summer of 2021.

Yet Afghanistan is a far trickier oversight for the Republican Party than the base-pleasing topics of border security or the Biden family. That’s because, as even some GOP lawmakers acknowledge, it’s not clear whether the 2021 pullout still resonates with voters.

“Americans want their pizzas in 30 minutes, and that’s about our attention span,” said Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee. “The average American, they’ve moved on.”

“The trouble with this bunch up here, in both parties,” Burchett added, is that “it takes them too dadgum long to get to issues.”

Indeed, the Afghanistan withdrawal is rarely acknowledged by the conservative media. It’s a stark difference from the 2012 attacks on U.S. officials in Libya that metastasized into a GOP-fueled investigation into then-presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton.

And even as McCaul pledged to hold State Department chief Antony Blinken in contempt over the withholding of an internal dissent cable — a document that details concerns from officials who objected to the withdrawal — some of his GOP colleagues are openly skeptical that his work will change any minds.

“The political points have all been scored,” Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said in an interview. “All you had to do was turn on the television. … The American people know it was a debacle, but I think they’d like to understand the decision-making process leading up to it.”

McCaul said in an interview that he views his Afghanistan oversight as “a federal prosecutor” might, vowing that “I’m not trying to score political points here.” His Democratic counterpart atop the committee, Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), countered that the investigation is part of a broader strategy by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to make Afghanistan matter in the 2024 elections.

And Meeks predicted that it would end in disappointment for the GOP.

“Look at any of the polls. You don’t even see it,” Meeks said of the Afghanistan exit in an interview. “It’s a blip on the screen. It’s not even there. This is just something that I think that the Republicans are doing.”

Democrats on both sides of the Capitol agree, saying it’s unlikely Republicans will be able to use their investigations to unearth new and significant enough information about withdrawal of troops, arguing that the facts of what happened are already well-established.

“It is not a type of situation where things are not known,” said Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), a senior member of the Foreign Relations Committee. “We know what happened. Can we do things better? Did we learn from the experience? Absolutely. It was a chaotic ending. We know that. But the cards were dealt by previous administrations, not by this administration.”

California Rep. Ted Lieu, a member of House Democratic leadership, all but shrugged at the Afghanistan probe — describing himself as “certainly fine” with evaluating the withdrawal but noting that foreign policy issues rarely affect the national political landscape.

“The election next year will be won by Democrats and it’s not going to be very complicated. There will be one issue: abortion,” he said.

Public polling has been limited since the U.S. withdrawal. An August 2021 poll from Pew Research found a solid majority of respondents approved of the decision to remove troops from Afghanistan, even as they critiqued Biden’s handling of the situation. That survey found 69 percent of Americans believe the U.S. failed in achieving its goals in Afghanistan.

An October 2022 poll ahead of the midterms by Pew found foreign policy listed as the 12th most important issue to voters, behind topics such as the economy, violent crime and abortion. It found 54 percent of people considered the broader topic of foreign policy “very important” to their midterm vote.

That may be part of what’s driving the sense among even some Republicans that, while many in the party see investigations as important, they’re unlikely to fundamentally alter how voters already view the issues at hand.

“I’m not convinced that really you’ve got the American public fixated on any of these investigations,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). “Nobody back home is asking me about any of these.”

Other rank-and-file Republicans say the emotional toll of the chaotic withdrawal continues to arise regularly when they’re at home, predicting that any new revelations through their investigations would resonate with Americans broadly.

“It’s still a question I get not just from veterans. Not just from Gold Star families, but I get it frequently from people all the time,” Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), who suffered severe injuries while serving in Afghanistan, said. “There’s so many different ways that people come about that conversation.”

It’s a conversation continuing in real time in the halls of Congress. McCaul worked for months to view the State Department dissent cable, subpoenaing Blinken for it in March. Efforts to get hands on the cable began in August 2021, when Meeks still chaired the foreign affairs panel.

The State Department relented on Wednesday and offered to let McCaul and Meeks view the document at its headquarters and with personal information redacted.

McCaul responded in a Thursday letter that he would “pause efforts to enforce” the subpoena and accepted an offer to view the documents “as soon as possible,” but said he would “insist on the Department allowing other Members to review the dissent cable and response.”

He, along with House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), also sent a letter Thursday to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley seeking information about the 2021 terrorist attack outside Kabul airport that resulted in the deaths of 13 U.S. service members and approximately 170 Afghan civilians.

And McCaul isn’t alone in conducting oversight on the Afghan withdrawal. A House Oversight Committee spokesperson described a recent hearing with inspectors general as the “first in a series of hearings the committee will have to examine President Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.”

“Chairman [James] Comer has made it clear that he will continue to work to hold this Administration accountable for the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal, safeguard taxpayer dollars from waste, fraud, and abuse, and provide the American people answers,” the panel spokesperson added.

But as far as McCaul’s concerned, he’s in the driver’s seat. The Oversight panel knows “that we’re kind of taking the lead moving forward with this,” he said. “It’s understood.”

GOP mulls how to make its Afghanistan oversight matter
read more

Mes Aynak Artifacts Exhibited in National Museum

The ancient relics that were displayed in the National Museum date back to the Kushan Empire and Sasanian dynasty era.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan displayed more than a hundred historical relics from the Mes Aynak area in Logar at the National Museum of Afghanistan in Kabul on International Museum Day.

The acting minister of Information and Culture, Khairullah Khairkhwa, urged the international community to set aside its differences with the Islamic Emirate and support Afghanistan’s cultural field.

“This is our message to the world: We shouldn’t sacrifice what we have in common for politics. Let’s work to preserve and protect the commonality that is unrelated to politics, and try not to lose it,” Khairkhwa said.

The ancient relics that were displayed in the National Museum date back to the Kushan Empire and Sasanian dynasty era.

“The officials promised us that they would cooperate with the National Museum and we are trying to build a standard building and hangar,” said Mayel Karimi, an employee of the national museum.

Meanwhile, Zubair Ebadi, head of the National Museum, said that the smuggling of relics is still going on in the country, but the Islamic Emirate is trying to prevent it.

According to Atiqullah Azizi, the deputy minister of art and culture at the Ministry of Information and Culture, the ministry is home to 2,000 to 5,000 ancient sites that require restoration.

“There are 2,000 to 5,000 historical sites that we have identified which need restoration and the world should help us in this regard,” Azizi noted.

According to UNESCO, the first museum in Afghanistan was established in 1919 at the Bagh-i-Bala palace overlooking Kabul, and consisted of manuscripts, miniatures, weapons and art objects belonging to the former royal families.

Mes Aynak Artifacts Exhibited in National Museum
read more

Chairman Says US House Committee ‘Will Do All It Can’ for Afghan Women

At the moment, women are not allowed to enroll in universities, nor are they allowed to work for non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

The chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, US Representative Michael McCaul, speaking at a discussion on Afghanistan, said the committee will do all in its power to assist Afghan women and girls.

Speaking at the “Roundtable on Crisis Facing Afghan Women and Girls,” McCaul said that Since the Islamic Emirate came to power in Afghanistan, the current Afghan government has issued more than 30 edicts aimed at severely limiting women’s freedoms.

“This committee will do everything in its power to help Afghan women and girls. And to hold the Taliban accountable for its human rights abuses,” McCaul noted.

However, the Islamic Emirate said that the issue of women’s rights is the country’s internal issue, and that the current government is trying to find a solution to it in accordance with Islamic principles.

“The issues they raised are related to the people of Afghanistan and are the internal issue of the Afghan people and the country of Afghanistan. This has nothing to do with them and is an interference in other’s affairs,” said Zabihullah Mujahid, the Islamic Emirate’s spokesman.

According to some political analysts, the continued restriction on women’s rights will exacerbate tensions between Kabul and the international community.

“They should bring meaningful reforms regarding women’s work and education so that the issue of Afghanistan’s recognition will be resolved, and will lead to the stability and unity of the nation,” said Najibullah Jami, a political analyst.

“The concerns of regional and beyond-region countries regarding women’s rights to work and education are political. The position of women’s education and their right to work is clear in Sharia law,” said Mohammad Zalmay Afghanyar, a political analyst.

At the moment, women are not allowed to enroll in universities, nor are they allowed to work for non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Girls above sixth grade are also prohibited from attending school.

Chairman Says US House Committee ‘Will Do All It Can’ for Afghan Women
read more

Qatar PM: Afghan People Need Intl Help to Avoid ‘Internal Crises’

Earlier, Qatar’s Foreign Ministry said that Qatar has been trying to create a political path between Afghanistan and the international community. 

The Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al-Thani said that in his meeting with the German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, there was emphasized “the necessity” for the “international community to cooperate to strengthen the capabilities of the people and enable them to avoid any internal crises.” 

The German Foreign Minister arrived in Qatar and met the country’s officials, including Al Thani.

According to a statement of Qatar’s Foreign Ministry, “both sides stressed the importance of having the international community continue cooperating to enhance the capabilities of the people and empower them against any internal crises, and the importance of moving forward in building peace, respecting human rights, especially women’s rights, providing education for girls and achieving development for all segments of Afghan society.”

Al Thani earlier visited Kandahar province where he held talks with the Islamic Emirate’s Prime Minister, Mullah Mohammad Hassan Akhund, who has currently not active in this position due to illness.

“The current government of Afghanistan can also reach itself to the level of the world within a structure which is described by Islam,” said Maisuam Kazemi, political analyst.

The Islamic Emirate welcomed Qatar’s stance toward cooperation with Afghanistan, saying that the interim government is trying to resolve the concerns of human rights in Afghanistan.

“The Islamic Emirate is committed to making efforts to address concerns that exist regarding human rights as well, and we are trying to find a solution for the issues which have yet to be solved,” said Zabiullah Mujahid.

Earlier, Qatar’s Foreign Ministry said that Qatar has been trying to create a political path between Afghanistan and the international community.

Qatar PM: Afghan People Need Intl Help to Avoid ‘Internal Crises’
read more