Over 22.9 million people in Afghanistan need urgent aid, says Iran’s UN Ambassador

Iran’s UN Ambassador, Iravani, has highlighted that over 22.9 million people in Afghanistan urgently require assistance due to the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

Amir Saeed Iravani, the Ambassador and Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations, stated that Afghanistan is facing one of the worst humanitarian crises globally, with over 22.9 million people in need of urgent assistance. He emphasized the severity of the situation and the growing demand for international support.

Iravani further reported that the humanitarian response plan for 2025 requires $2.42 billion in funding, yet the financial contributions have remained alarmingly low. He urged that humanitarian aid should be impartial and unconditional to ensure that it reaches those in need without any obstacles, stressing the importance of continued assistance to Afghanistan.

Despite claims by the Taliban regarding economic growth, Afghanistan’s economy remains fragile and unstable according to reputable international economic institutions. Reports indicate widespread poverty, a vulnerable economy, and an uncertain economic future, with the country facing severe economic challenges over the past three years.

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres also noted earlier on March that although intense conflict has subsided in the past three years, Afghanistan’s economy continues to be fragile. This underscores the ongoing difficulties faced by the Afghanistan people and the need for sustained international support to stabilize the nation’s economy and provide much-needed relief.

Afghanistan’s crisis remains dire, and international aid must increase to meet the rising humanitarian needs. The international community must ensure that assistance continues to flow without interruption and reach those who are most vulnerable.

Over 22.9 million people in Afghanistan need urgent aid, says Iran’s UN Ambassador
read more

Germany Evaluating Engagement with the Islamic Emirate

The caretaker government in Afghanistan has expressed its willingness to maintain positive and mutually beneficial relations with Germany.

Bruno Kahl, president of the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND), in an interview with a German media outlet said that the agency is working on how to establish engagement with Afghanistan’s caretaker government.

According to Kahl, the BND gathers intelligence from Afghanistan to assist the German federal government in making informed decisions regarding its approach toward the Islamic Emirate.

”We as intelligence services must obtain the information that’s important so that this federal government can make the appropriate decisions, and we do get from the particular region as well, and then the federal government old or new has to decide how it wants to deal with the de facto government in Afghanistan,” he said.

Meanwhile, the caretaker government in Afghanistan has expressed its willingness to maintain positive and mutually beneficial relations with Germany.

Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate, said: “Afghanistan seeks good relations with all countries, including Germany, which has historically maintained strong ties with Afghanistan. Both nations aim to protect their people’s interests through positive engagement.”

Political analyst Zalmai Afghan Yar commented: “All countries establish relations based on their national interests. Germany’s effort to find a mechanism for engagement is a positive step that could help Afghanistan break out of isolation.”

Kahl’s remarks on assessing engagement with the Islamic Emirate come as some German politicians have previously suggested that Berlin should negotiate directly with Afghanistan’s current government regarding Afghan migrants in Germany.

Meanwhile, Germany is expected to form a new government by the end of March.

Germany Evaluating Engagement with the Islamic Emirate
read more

Fitrat: UN Should Make Decisions ‘Independently’

TOLOnews

TV Network

11 March 2025

The human rights situation, particularly women’s issues in Afghanistan, was another key topic of the meeting.

Hamdullah Fitrat, the deputy spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate, responded to the UN Security Council meeting, stating that the caretaker government has consistently sought to engage with the international community.

According to Fitrat, some countries attempt to create obstacles in this process. “Unfortunately, some countries create barriers in this regard. It is up to the UN to make sound decisions independently and not under the influence of major powers. If this happens, Afghanistan can regain its rightful place on the global stage and reclaim its seat at the UN,” he said.

During last night’s Security Council meeting, discussions focused on counterterrorism efforts, the formation of an inclusive government, and the protection of human rights in Afghanistan. Representatives from Russia, China, Pakistan, the United States, and other countries called for concrete actions by the caretaker government in the fight against terrorism.

Dorothy Shea, the U.S. representative to the UN, said: “We are also concerned about the transnational threat posed by ISIS-K. We call on the Taliban to abide by their counterterrorism commitments. The Taliban must ensure Afghanistan can never again be used as a safe haven for terrorist groups to threaten the security of the United States, our allies, or any country.”

The representatives of China and Russia, in addition to discussing these issues, called for the lifting of travel sanctions on Islamic Emirate officials and emphasized the importance of forming an inclusive government in Afghanistan.

Vassily Nebenzia, Russia’s UN representative, remarked: “Among other imperatives is shaping a truly inclusive Government with the participation of all ethno-political groups in the country. We hope to see positive momentum on both fronts.”

Fu Cong, China’s permanent representative to the UN, said during the Security Council meeting: “China reiterates that the Council should reinstate its package of exemptions to the travel ban imposed on the relevant personnel of the Afghan interim government, and timely adjust the 1988 sanctions regime, so as to facilitate the external engagement of the interim government.”

The human rights situation, particularly women’s issues in Afghanistan, was another key topic of the meeting.

“This remains vital whilst Afghans – especially women and girls – continue to suffer under a series of oppressive restrictions. At the time, members of the Taliban claimed that the March 2022 ban on secondary education for girls was temporary. Almost three years on, girls in Afghanistan continue to be denied their right to education,” said James Kariuki, the UK’s deputy permanent representative to the UN.

At the end of the meeting, nine countries issued a joint statement under the theme Women, Peace, and Security in Afghanistan, expressing concern over the situation of women and supporting the extension of the UNAMA mandate.

Fitrat: UN Should Make Decisions ‘Independently’
read more

Otunbayeva: Is the Govt Ready for Global Integration?

The head of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), Roza Otunbayeva, presented a report on the situation in Afghanistan to the UN Security Council last night (March 10).

Otunbayeva emphasized in the report that the current authorities of the interim government should clarify whether they want to integrate with the international community or not.

“It is the responsibility of the de facto authorities to indicate whether they want Afghanistan to be reintegrated into the international system and, if so, whether they are willing to take the necessary steps,” said Otunbayeva.

Otunbayeva also highlighted concerns regarding the possible conclusion of UNAMA’s mission in Afghanistan, warning that the situation would further deteriorate.

The UN representative stated that she hopes UNAMA’s mandate in Afghanistan will be extended next week.

In the report, Otunbayeva claimed that Afghans fear increased isolation and marginalization, and the reduction of humanitarian aid is another major concern for them.

“In 2025, more than 50 percent of the population — some 23 million people — require humanitarian assistance. But this assistance is rapidly decreasing. The defunding of assistance is already having and will continue to have a significant impact on the Afghan people. In the past month, more than 200 health facilities have closed,” she said.

Otunbayeva said that essential malnutrition services for children have been limited, and implementing partners have significantly reduced their footprint and coordination capacity.

The head of UNAMA said that the Afghan economy grew around 2.7 percent in 2024. Investments, especially in infrastructure, supported by regional countries, are taking place, but in the short- and medium-term current levels of growth cannot compensate for the drop in foreign aid and the growing population, she said.
She also mentioned the closure of medical institutes for girls, stating that it has further worsened the healthcare situation.

“This new restriction deepens a long-term gap in the country’s capacity to protect the
health of women and indeed all Afghans. This will further worsen maternal and infant mortality in Afghanistan, already one of the highest in the world,” she stated.

She called on the international community to support the caretaker government in cultivating alternatives to poppy cultivation.

The head of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) makes these remarks as the mission is set to conclude on March 17 of this year. So far, the Security Council has not clarified its stance on extending or terminating the mission.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has also not yet reacted to these statements.

Otunbayeva: Is the Govt Ready for Global Integration?
read more

Afghans promised a future in the U.S. now fear deportation from Pakistan

The Washington Post
8 March 2025

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — After 2½ years of anxious waiting, 36-year-old Shirzad and his family were booked on a Feb. 3 resettlement flight from Pakistan to the United States. Two weeks before they were due to depart, President Donald Trump signed an executive order suspending America’s refugee program.

“Now, we’re living as if we’re under house arrest — we don’t leave our home anymore for fear of being detained,” said Shirzad, an Afghan former aid worker for a U.S.-funded organization.

Thousands of Afghans who were set to be relocated to the United States before Trump halted refugee admissions are at risk of being forced out of their homes in Pakistan — and potentially sent back to Taliban-run Afghanistan.

Pakistani authorities were already gearing up for a major deportation campaign targeting hundreds of thousands of Afghans with no path to resettlement in Europe or the United States. Now, even those who had been promised a new life in America have been told they must leave Pakistan’s capital region by the end of the month, which they fear is a pretext for arrest and deportation.

While Pakistan has long respected Western requests to spare Afghans with ties to NATO countries, the upcoming campaign is expected to target anyone without a valid visa — including many like Shirzad, who, after being in limbo here for years, have recently been unable to pay surging visa extension fees.

Hiding inside their cramped apartment on the outskirts of Islamabad has been particularly hard on his two children, Shirzad said. But going back to Afghanistan is not an option: “It’s like inviting death into your home,” he said. Like others in this story, he spoke on the condition that he be identified by his last name, fearing unwanted scrutiny from the Taliban.

Afghans interviewed for this story said the uncertainty has taken a growing mental toll. Some said they were battling depression and suicidal thoughts.

Aman, 41, a former member of the Afghan security forces, can’t shake the thought of his potential arrest by Pakistani police. If it comes to that, he said, he wonders if he should ask them to shoot him rather than send him back.

“When my little daughter sees police officers, she starts crying,” he said, sitting in a bare room with faded walls in one of the capital’s densely populated Afghan neighborhoods.

Islamabad began deporting Afghans who were not vocal critics of the Taliban in late 2023, amid deteriorating ties with the government in Kabul. Over 800,000 Afghans — some of whom were born in Pakistan — have already been sent back.

In recent weeks, Pakistani officials have also begun to put more pressure on the estimated half-million Afghan refugees who arrived here after the Taliban takeover in 2021. Pakistani officials say few other countries would have been willing to take in so many refugees in the first place and their patience has run out amid mounting public pressure over competition for work and housing.

“It is a fact that you will have to go,” Amir Muqam, Pakistan’s minister for states and frontier regions, said recently, addressing Afghans without valid visas.

For now, Pakistani officials say they are focusing their efforts on the estimated 1.5 million Afghan refugees who fled across the border after the Soviet invasion of their country in the late 1970s. But the estimated 20,000 Afghans whose resettlement cases were processed by the U.S. government before Trump’s executive order fear they will be caught up in the dragnet.

The Jan. 20 order suspended refugee arrivals for at least 90 days, pending a government review. Some Afghans have still been able to enter the United States in recent weeks under Special Immigrant Visas — reserved for those who directly supported the 20-year American war effort, including as military interpreters. But AfghanEvac, a volunteer organization that helps families resettle in the United States, warned Wednesday that it has “credible indications that a travel ban affecting Afghan nationals may be imminent,” which could seal off the last remaining path.

Thousands of Afghans have been arrested in Pakistan over the past two months, and hundreds deported, said Umer Ijaz Gilani, a human rights lawyer in Islamabad.

“There are legal precedents stating that anyone who has come to Pakistan and is at genuine risk can’t be sent back,” Gilani said. “It’s against our international obligations.”

A statement from Pakistan’s Interior Ministry said the country “has been a gracious host and continues to fulfill its commitments and obligations as a responsible state. … No one will be maltreated during the repatriation process, and arrangements for food and health care for returning foreigners have also been put in place.”

Of the more than a dozen refugees interviewed by The Washington Post, none said they heard from the U.S. government about when — or whether — their resettlement cases might proceed.

“These folks are struggling to survive,” said Shawn VanDiver, the president of AfghanEvac.

Although the Taliban leadership issued a general amnesty for former officials in the U.S.-backed government more than three years ago, the United Nations has documented more than 200 extrajudicial killings of former Afghan officials and members of the armed forces since the withdrawal of U.S. forces. The government has also imposed increasingly harsh laws limiting the rights of women and girls.

Marzia Hafizi, 32, has been working for an exiled Afghan broadcaster since fleeing her country for the Pakistani capital region shortly after the fall of Kabul, presenting segments critical of the Taliban from across the border. Over the past two months, she has left her home only once, for a doctor’s visit, she said, after an anonymous threat was sent to her channel suggesting that her whereabouts are known to the Taliban.

She has reported recently about alleged hacks targeting Taliban ministries and accusations of sexual abuse under the regime. She had hoped Pakistan would continue to grant her sanctuary while she waited for U.S. authorities to facilitate her relocation.

One of her sisters, still in Kabul, was so confident the family would be welcomed to the United States that she passed on an opportunity to relocate to France, opting to wait for a U.S. decision on her pending application.

The Pakistani deportation drive, and the increasingly repressive political climate in Kabul, have alarmed Hafizi.

“I don’t even want to think about being deported,” she said.

Worried about their future, a group of Afghans met for a protest at an indoor shelter this week on the outskirts of Islamabad. But their anger wasn’t directed at Pakistan.

The room was covered in American flags. Some held up photos of Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. “Honor your commitments — before it’s too late,” one poster read.

Zahir Bahand, 51, was a regional government spokesman under the U.S.-backed administration. His 29-year-old son and his son’s wife were among the last Afghans to make it to the United States before Trump’s inauguration in January. Bahand, his wife and their two younger children had expected to join them there soon. They had already sold their belongings. Now he worries they may never make it.

“Many people who worked with other NATO allies have long been evacuated, but we — the ones who assisted the United States — are being left behind,” he said.

Shaiq Hussain and Haq Nawaz Khan contributed to this report.

Afghans promised a future in the U.S. now fear deportation from Pakistan
read more

Afghan women who fled Taliban to study abroad face imminent return after USAID cuts

Yogita Limaye

South Asia and Afghanistan correspondent

BBC News

8 March 2025

More than 80 Afghan women who fled the Taliban to pursue higher education in Oman now face imminent return back to Afghanistan, following the Trump administration’s sweeping cuts to foreign aid programmes.

Funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), their scholarships were abruptly terminated after a funding freeze ordered by President Donald Trump when he returned to office in January.

“It was heart-breaking,” one student told the BBC, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals. “Everyone was shocked and crying. We’ve been told we will be sent back within two weeks.”

Since regaining power nearly four years ago, the Taliban has imposed draconian restrictions on women, including banning them from universities.

The Trump administration’s aid freeze has faced legal roadblocks, but thousands of humanitarian programmes around the world have already been terminated as the White House dismantles USAID and cuts tens of billions of dollars in spending.

The students in Oman say preparations are under way to return them to Afghanistan, and have appealed to the international community to “intervene urgently”.

The BBC has seen emails sent to the 82 students informing them that their scholarships have been “discontinued” due to the termination of the programme and USAID funding.

The emails – which acknowledge the news will be “profoundly disappointing and unsettling” – refer to travel arrangements back to Afghanistan, which caused alarm among the students.

“We need immediate protection, financial assistance and resettlement opportunities to a safe country where we can continue our education,” one told the BBC.

The USAID website’s media contact page remains offline. The BBC has contacted the US State Department for comment.

The Afghan women, now facing a forced return from Oman, had been pursuing graduate and post-graduate courses under the Women’s Scholarship Endowment (WSE), a USAID programme which began in 2018.

It provided scholarships for Afghan women to study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), the disciplines banned for women by the Taliban.

Just over a week ago, the students were told their scholarships had been terminated.

“It’s like everything has been taken away from me,” another student told the BBC. “It was the worst moment. I’m under extreme stress right now.”

These women, mostly aged in their 20s, qualified for scholarships in 2021 before the Taliban seized Afghanistan. Many continued their studies in Afghan universities until December 2022, when the Taliban banned higher education for women.

After 18 months in limbo, they said they fled to Pakistan last September.

USAID then facilitated their visas to Oman, where they arrived between October and November 2024.

“If we are sent back, we will face severe consequences. It would mean losing all our dreams,” a student said. “We won’t be able to study and our families might force us to get married. Many of us could also be at personal risk due to our past affiliations and activism.”

The Taliban has cracked down on women protesting for education and work, with many activists beaten, detained and threatened.

Women in Afghanistan describe themselves as “dead bodies moving around” under the regime’s brutal policies.

The Taliban government says it has been trying to resolve the issue of women’s education, but has also defended its supreme leader’s diktats, saying they are “in accordance with Islamic Sharia law”.

“Afghanistan is experiencing gender apartheid, with women systematically excluded from basic rights, including education,” a student said.

She and her friends in Oman had managed to escape that fate, as the scholarships were supposed to fund their education until 2028.

“When we came here, our sponsors told us to not go back to Afghanistan till 2028 for vacations or to visit our families because it’s not safe for us. And now they’re telling us to go,” a student said.

Last month, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly blamed the situation for Afghan women on the US military’s withdrawal from the country under the Democrats, telling the Washington Post: “Afghan women are suffering because Joe Biden’s disastrous withdrawal allowed the Taliban to impose mediaeval Sharia law policies.”

The decision to slash American aid funding has come under the Trump administration, and been implemented by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.

And these women face a grim future, urgently seeking a lifeline before time runs out.

Additional reporting by Aakriti Thapar

Afghan women who fled Taliban to study abroad face imminent return after USAID cuts
read more

UNESCO gives voice to Afghan girls and women and calls for their rights to be restored

UNESCO

“We have no right to education, no right to work, no right to even exist freely. They are removing us from society.” One woman in Afghanistan gives voice to what many Afghan women and girls are feeling: for them, life has become unbearable, limited to the four walls they live in. 

Since the Taliban returned to power in 2021, education has been forbidden to girls aged over 12. As a result of this ban, Afghanistan is now the only country in the world where girls do not have the right to attend secondary school. 

To date, these restrictions have affected around 1.5 million Afghan girls. According to new UNESCO data, if the ban continues until 2030, over 4 million girls will be affected. 

Disturbingly, this regression follows decades of progress. After an ambitious international campaign coordinated by UNESCO, the number of girls enrolled in primary school rose from nearly zero in 2001 to 2.5 million in 2021. By this date, 30% of Afghan girls and women could also read and write – compared to just 17% two decades earlier. 

Today, these advances are at an end, with the current restrictions wreaking disastrous consequences. Punitive salary cuts and irregular salary payments for female educators have led to a shortage of qualified teachers; a lack of equipment and facilities have taken their toll on education services. This decline in the quality of education has gone hand in hand with considerable learning losses. 

Even more concerningly, the restrictions are taking a toll on women and girls’ mental health. According to Afghan journalist Diba Akbari, “If women were studying, schools and universities were closed to them. Work was closed to them. Today, these women are all prisoners and struggling with mental health problems.”

Alternative learning methods

In this bleak context, alternative learning methods have offered a glimmer of hope. For the past three and a half years, UNESCO has provided financial support and training to Afghan media outlets, enabling educational programmes to be broadcast to an estimated audience of 17 million Afghans. 

We have established community-based literacy classes in several provinces, partnered with overseas universities offering online courses and supported educational programmes via radio and television.

One of these media outlets is Begum TV in Paris, along with its Kabul-based radio station, Radio Begum. Created by women for women, Radio Begum offers on-air-schooling, mental health support and financial literacy classes, reaching an audience of around 5.9 million – nearly two-thirds women – in 19 provinces.

However, in February 2025, Radio Begum was taken off air, after its offices were raided by Taliban officials. This closure caused widespread consternation, as one of Afghan women’s few remaining lifelines to the outside world was cut off. As underlined by one woman, “There is no more voice for us in Afghanistan.”

On International Women’s Day, UNESCO is seeking to change this situation, by ensuring the voices of Afghan girls and women are heard. It is organizing an international conference for women journalists, musicians and artists to call for the unconditional restoration of the right to education for Afghan girls and women. 

The event aims to shed light on the dire situation of Afghan women and girls, to honour and amplify their voices and to discuss ways in which the international community could support their education.Participants include street artist Shamsia Hassani, who will produce a piece of artwork for the occasion. Ms Hassani’s works portray Afghan women in a different light – brave, resilient and ambitious. As she says: “The woman that I use in my work… she’s alone… she’s facing a lot of problems. But she still is strong.” 

This is the key takeaway: Afghan girls and women are not weak, and they have a powerful message for the world. In the words of one defiant girl, “It is true that you have closed the gates of schools and universities, but you can never close our minds.”

UNESCO gives voice to Afghan girls and women and calls for their rights to be restored
read more

He Was Once a Covert Taliban Operative. Now He’s the Friendly Taxman.

Abdul Qahar Ghorbandi, head of Afghanistan’s Taxpayers Services Directorate, has the hard job of raising money in an impoverished country hobbled by international sanctions.

He is the Taxman of Kabul, a bearded, black-turbaned Talib with a genial manner and the calculating mind of a computer-savvy accountant.

As director of the Taliban’s Taxpayers Services Directorate, Abdul Qahar Ghorbandi has the unenviable task of raising revenue for the government of a wretchedly poor, isolated nation.

From his perch behind an enormous desk next to a black and white Taliban flag, Mr. Ghorbandi rides herd on hundreds of Afghan taxpayers each weekday. He makes sure they arrive with income documentation and leave with a fistful of tax forms to fill out.

Teachers, money changers, truckers, wedding planners, grocers and others trudge the worn hallways of the imposing tax building, discussing their taxes with Talibs pecking away at computer terminals.

U.S. aid, drastically reduced since 2021, could be eliminated entirely under President Trump’s budget cuts. That aid has gone to the United Nations and nongovernmental organizations working in Afghanistan, not directly to the Taliban government.

With the Taliban now in power, former guerrilla fighters must function as bureaucrats. In the 280-person tax department, they work alongside employees inherited from the U.S.-backed government that the Taliban overthrew.

“At the same table we have people with turbans, with beards, next to people with suits,” said Mohammad Walid Haqmal, spokesman for the Ministry of Finance.

Mr. Ghorbandi, who said he had a master’s degree in computer science, presides over a tax administration computer system converted from English into Pashto and Dari. He has hired IT experts to modernize the department.

He has also tried to instill a culture of transparency, he said as he took a break for a lunch of beef kebabs and rice. His employees are not permitted to handle cash. Taxpayers take their forms to a government-run bank and pay taxes there.

When he is not at his desk signing reams of documents delivered by aides hustling in and out, he said, he visits different sections of his department, asking taxpayers how he could make the process faster.

Although many well-connected Afghans once avoided paying taxes, Mr. Ghorbandi stressed that even as the government Taxman, he was not exempt. He said he paid 30,000 afghanis a month, or a little over $400.

However open and efficient, it is still a tax office, though, and not every taxpayer leaves satisfied.

Shamsurahman Shams, who showed up one day late last year, had a beef with the Taxman. He said the two private schools he helped run had not turned a profit the past three years — and he carried a plastic folder stuffed with documents to prove it. Yet he had been assessed 500,000 afghanis, or about $7,350, in taxes.

He engaged in a spirited but civil discussion with a department employee, showing the man his documents. There was no resolution. He was told to return later to resume negotiations.

During the war, the Taliban ran a lucrative tax system that levied customs duties, trucking fees and local taxes in areas they controlled. They also earned millions by imposing 10 percent taxes — “ushar” in Islam — on poppy farmers, though they have since banned poppy production.

In 2023, the Taliban government collected about $3 billion in taxes, customs and fees, or 15.5 percent of gross domestic product. (The comparable rate in the United States was 25.2 percent). The biggest source for the Taliban was so-called nontax revenue — customs duties, mining revenues, telecom licenses, airport charges, and fees for national ID cards, passports and visas, the World Bank reported. That revenue, for the first half of last year, increased 27 percent compared with the same period the previous year.

Half of government revenues were spent on security and the military last year, and just 26 percent on social programs — most of that on education for boys, according to international observers.

Merchants with earnings over that amount are taxed at just 0.3 percent — a rate that American conservatives would surely appreciate.

There are no cash penalties or interest fees for taxpayers who do not pony up on time. But scofflaws can lose their business licenses and access to the banking system.

“We are human,” Mr. Ghorbandi said. “We don’t want to put burdens on our people.”

He and Mr. Haqmal, the Finance Ministry spokesman, said the ultimate goal was to eliminate all income taxes.

Another direct order from Sheikh Haibatullah has been the shredding of women’s rights and broader restrictions on civil liberties for all Afghans. Women are prohibited from traveling any significant distance without a male relative and are obligated to cover their entire bodies and faces in public. The sound of a woman’s voice outside her home is banned.

A striking feature of the tax department’s 15 sections in Kabul is the sight of female taxpayers in rooms crammed with men.

Lida Ismaeli, who operates a private school, sat next to a bearded Talib as he reviewed her tax status on a computer. She said no one had complained that she spoke with a male employee about her taxes with no male relative present.

“The system is better now — it’s more fair,” she said.

Down a darkened hallway, Mohammad Taqi Irfani, a money changer, huddled over a computer screen with a tax employee. Mr. Irfani seemed resigned to his assessed tax payment of 73,500 afghanis, or about $1,080, on his annual earnings.

He said he did not enjoy paying taxes — who does? — but his tax burden was clearly explained to him, and his business accounts were not questioned. Under the American-backed government, he said, tax collectors came to his office and demanded bribes to lower his tax assessment.

“They were in it just to make money for themselves,” he said. “So far under this government, no one has ever asked me for a bribe.”

Safiullah Padshah and Yaqoob Akbary contributed reporting.

David Zucchino is a contributing writer for The New York Times

He Was Once a Covert Taliban Operative. Now He’s the Friendly Taxman.
read more

UNHCR Representative: Do Not Forget Afghanistan, Situation Will Worsen

His remarks come as the United States, previously the largest donor, has suspended its aid to several countries, including Afghanistan.

Arafat Jamal, the representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Afghanistan, has called on the world not to forget Afghanistan.

Speaking to TOLOnews, the UNHCR representative stressed that given Afghanistan’s strategic position in the region, abandoning the country would lead to challenges such as mass migration and regional instability.

Arafat Jamal stated: “Stay with the people of Afghanistan. Whatever you think of the policies or other political situations, the people need you to stay there. If you abandon Afghanistan now, it may turn for the worse, people may start to leave and we will have instability in a very important region in Asia, so don’t leave us alone.”

His remarks come as the United States, previously the largest donor, has suspended its aid to several countries, including Afghanistan. However, Jamal emphasized that now is not the time to abandon Afghanistan.

The UNHCR representative in Afghanistan added: “Don’t forget Afghanistan. Afghanistan is a strategically important country. Historically it has been at the center of trade routes and of civilizations. There has been so much effort on Afghanistan—some of it positive, much of it negative. Now is not the time to disappoint Afghanistan.”

“Afghanistan has been engaged in war for 40 or 45 years. Its citizens have migrated in the past and continue to do so. Therefore, the United Nations, as a global organization, and its agencies must strengthen their coordination with the world on this issue,” Hewad Zazai, a political analyst, told TOLOnews.

A few weeks ago, UN Secretary-General António Guterres and the head of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in Afghanistan also urged the world to support Afghanistan, assist millions of people, and prevent a larger crisis in the country.

UNHCR Representative: Do Not Forget Afghanistan, Situation Will Worsen
read more

Efforts Ongoing to Reopen Torkham Crossing

Meanwhile, the closure of the Torkham crossing by Pakistan has now entered its eighteenth day.

After Sunday’s (yesterday’s) unsuccessful negotiations to reopen the Torkham crossing, efforts to initiate new discussions are ongoing.

Younus Mohmand, the first deputy of the Afghanistan Chamber of Commerce and Investment, stated that recent meetings with Pakistani representatives have yielded no agreement. However, efforts continue to start new talks and invite officials from Pakistan’s chambers of commerce to Afghanistan.

According to Mohmand, this time the goal is to have Pakistani trade officials travel to Afghanistan and continue discussions on the matter.

Younus Mohmand told TOLOnews: “If possible, in the next meeting, they will come to Afghanistan, and another meeting will be held at the border. We will share our two- or three-day report with provincial officials and with the governor to get their permission.”

Meanwhile, the closure of the Torkham crossing by Pakistan has now entered its eighteenth day.

According to Mohmand, the continued closure of Torkham causes daily losses of over three million dollars for traders on both sides.

“On the Pakistani side, at the zero point between Afghanistan and Pakistan, a jirga (council) was held, and Pakistanis made three requests, which their elders shared with Afghan elders. However, no action has been taken so far to determine whether Pakistan’s demands will be accepted to reopen the gate,” Zalmai Azimi, one of the traders, told TOLOnews.

Some analysts believe Pakistan uses crossing closures as a tool to pressure Afghanistan’s interim government.

“The closure of Torkham puts economic pressure on the people of Afghanistan, Central Asia, and Pakistan. In such circumstances, economic and trade matters should remain entirely separate from politics,” said Fazl Rahman Oria, a political analyst.

“Pakistan aims to gradually exert pressure on Afghanistan to gain political and geopolitical advantages,” said Moeen Gul Samkanai, another political analyst.

Eighteen days ago, when Islamic Emirate forces were constructing facilities on this side of the hypothetical Durand Line, Pakistan closed the Torkham crossing to all movement. This led to clashes between the two sides at Torkham.

Efforts Ongoing to Reopen Torkham Crossing
read more