The Taliban has said that the deal is a practical step toward achieving peace and stability in the country.
The deal signed between President Donald Trump’s administration and the Taliban marked a one-year anniversary on Sunday, with the Afghan government saying that the accord did not end up with the expected results as violence in the country has increased. But the Taliban says it is a practical step toward achieving peace and stability in the country.
The deal was signed after 18 months of talks between the US negotiating team led by special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad and the Taliban negotiators in Doha. The United States agreed in the deal to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan by May 1 and the Taliban committed to cutting their ties with al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups and not allow them to operate on Afghan soil.
“They (Taliban) have committed to cut their ties with terrorist groups; however, according to information obtained by the government, they have not cut these ties,” State Minister for Peace Affairs Sayed Saadat Mansoor Naderi said.
“There isn’t anything in this agreement to give hope to Afghans. This has made progress in the peace process fragile,” said Rahmatullah Andar, spokesman for the National Security Council.
Based on the agreement, the intra-Afghan talks between negotiators from the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the Taliban were supposed to begin 10 days after the deal was signed, but this was delayed due to differences over the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners by the Afghan government, something which was later approved by the Loya Jirga, the grand council, convened by President Ghani.
“Afghans expected that violence would end when the deal was signed, but this did not happen and instead it increased,” President Ghani’s special envoy for Pakistan, Mohammad Umer Daudzai, said.
Finally, the Afghan government released over 5,000 Taliban prisoners and the intra-Afghan negotiations began on September 12 at a ceremony in Doha. The two sides continued their discussions for three months but were able only to agree on procedural rules of the negotiations during this period.
Later on, both sides began discussions on the agenda of the talks, but these were stopped for two weeks so that both sides could discuss issues with their leaders.
The first round of talks between the Afghan Republic and the Taliban negotiators continued for three months and were prolonged due to their differences over the religious basis for the talks, the relation of the US-Taliban deal with the talks, and the future government setup.
“Only one of four items mentioned in the Doha agreement has been practiced by the Taliban and that is the start of the talks,” Afghan republic negotiator Fawzia Koofi said.
The republic negotiators returned to Kabul in December and went back to Qatar three weeks after their stay in Kabul to begin the second round of the negotiations.
“Overall, the actions demonstrated by the Taliban so far have created doubts around their will for peace,” Afghan republic negotiator Mohammad Amin Ahmadi said.
The second round of the talks started early in January but relations were cool as there were reports about the intention by the new US administration to review the Doha deal. This led to 36-day pause in the meetings of the working groups of both sides who were expected to finalize the agenda of the negotiations.
But the Taliban in a statement on the first anniversary of the deal criticized US forces for its continuation of the airstrikes. Referring to the review of the deal, the Taliban has said that the peace agreement—signed in Doha—is the practical way toward peace and stability in Afghanistan and that seeking any alternative for the deal will be a failed attempt and will end in failure for the peace efforts.
Taliban deputy leader Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar in a voice message on the first anniversary of the deal called it the main tool to bring peace and stability and an Islamic system to the country.
“The process should move forward based on the Doha deal and the Afghanistan issue should be solved through a political settlement,” said Abdul Salam Zaeef, Taliban ambassador to Islamabad during their regime in Kabul.
The negotiating teams in Doha have held four meetings over the last week but these discussions have not had any progress. Sources familiar with the process said that progress and speed in the talks are dependent on the announcement of the results of the US review of the Doha agreement.
Peace Negotiators Hold 3rd Meeting Following Talks Stalemate
26 Feb 2021
Peace negotiators discussed the agenda of the negotiations in their third meeting, officials said.
The Afghan Republic and the Taliban negotiators held their third meeting on Thursday evening after over a month-long deadlock in the talks with the main focus on the agenda of the negotiators, officials confirmed.
The meeting was held in working group level that is aimed at finalizing the agenda of the negotiations.
“Discussions were held around agendas of the two sides and their priorities regarding the agenda of the talks,” said Najia Anwari, spokesperson for the State Ministry for Peace Affairs.
This comes as President Ghani met with ambassadors of NATO member nations in Kabul and discussions were focused on the peace process, the US’s decision to review the Doha deal and the NATO defense ministers conference, the Presidential Palace said.
In this meeting, President Ghani highlighted the role of Afghan forces in fighting terrorism and emphasized the need for a ceasefire, the Palace said.
NATO ambassadors in the meeting reiterated the alliance’s longstanding support to ANDSF, peace, ceasefire, protection of gains and democracy in Afghanistan, the statement said.
However, the Taliban has been insisting that the US has violated the Doha agreement.
The deputy leader of the group, Sirajuddin Haqqani, in an audio message to his supporters has accused the US of violating the Doha agreement and has said that the group has remained firm to its commitments in the deal.
Meanwhile, Mohammad Umer Daudzai, President Ghani’s special envoy for Pakistan, met with Pakistani officials in Islamabad about the Afghan peace process.
Daudzai said that it seems that this time Pakistan is looking to contribute sincerely in the peace process.
He said that he has also shared a roadmap for peace in Afghanistan with the Pakistani officials that has focused on ceasefire by Pakistan’s cooperation and has sought Pakistan’s help to persuade the Taliban to continue the peace process.
Daudzai said that Pakistan is concerned that the new US administration’s review of the Doha agreement could lead to changes in the text of the agreement and that the Taliban will not continue talks.
“They will read the text and will decide about it and will tell us that on which part they can support us and on what part they cannot. Then in the third phase, that will become a plan and will be implemented by the two countries,” said Daudzai.
Daudzai added that Pakistan is moving towards a change, “but we cannot say that it will change as we use the term change or to say that we will soon see a ceasefire and peace.”
Meanwhile, Roha Rahmani, Afghan ambassador to the US, has said that there is a need for more pressure by the US on the efforts to continue the peace negotiations.
“The path ahead is not easy, but it is not impossible. With the demonstrated resilience of the Afghan people and our allies’ commitment to security, camaraderie, and democracy, we can achieve durable peace together,” she said.
This comes as German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer during an unannounced visit on Friday to the city of Mazar-e-Sharif in Balkh province said that Germany strongly supports the Afghan peace process.
“Afghanistan urgently needs a settlement between the opposing groups of its society,” Kramp-Karrenbauer said according to a statement, as quoted by Reuters, adding that Berlin’s goal remained an orderly withdrawal of troops.
According to Reuters report, Kramp-Karrenbauer has warned that a premature withdrawal of NATO troops could jeopardize peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban and said NATO troops needed to prepare for Taliban violence should they stay beyond the end of April.